Unpacking Clients’ Beliefs About Emotion Regulation in Therapy

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Psychiatric, Emotional and Behavioral Disorders".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 September 2026 | Viewed by 1298

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Health Service Psychology, Kansas City University, Kansas City, MO 64106, USA
Interests: emotion regulation; emotion granularity; emotion perception; embodied learning and therapy; embodied cognition

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department Stem Education and Teacher Development, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, MA 02747, USA
Interests: embodied cognition; cognitive development; clinical assessment; learning sciences

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Health Service Psychology, Kansas City University, Kansas City, MO 64106, USA
Interests: qualitative clinical psychology practice

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue will feature carefully curated articles that explore contemporary advances in how patients’ and individuals’ beliefs about emotion regulation (ER) contribute to the advancement of theory, assessment, and/or treatment across various clinical phenomena. Building upon Gross’s (2015) extended process model of ER—encompassing identification, selection, implementation, and monitoring—we aim to provide a more holistic understanding of therapeutic interventions. While many current psychotherapies emphasize specific stages, particularly the selection of ER strategies by targeting beliefs about emotion generation (as seen in CBT’s promotion of reappraisal), this Issue delves into how a patient’s or individual’s underlying beliefs at each stage of the ER process significantly influence their self-monitoring capacities and overall emotional well-being. For example, a belief in one’s limited agency over emotions might hinder the initial identification of an emotion as regulable. By illuminating the impact of these beliefs across the entire extended process model, we intend to identify novel and more impactful clinical interventions that address the full spectrum of emotion regulation challenges. This deeper understanding of the role of beliefs in the complete ER process has the potential to yield more targeted and effective clinical interventions.

Eligible review articles can be in a range of formats (e.g., systematic reviews, meta-analyses, narrative reviews, theoretical perspectives) and should be formatted in line with the 7th Edition of the Publication Manual of APA, as per the standard author guidelines of Behavioral Sciences.

Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • The role of patient and individual beliefs in emotion regulation, as they might relate to different types of mental health disorders;
  • The efficacy of treatment programs (or the assessment of techniques) that focus on emotion regulation based on patient and individual beliefs;
  • The utility and validity of clinical treatment techniques or psychotherapeutic interventions that outline the relationship between emotion regulation and self-monitoring of the process.

Kind regards,

Dr. Jennifer Marie Binzak Fugate
Prof. Dr. Sheila Macrine
Dr. Jason Malousek
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • emotion regulation
  • beliefs
  • self-monitoring
  • therapeutic interventions

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

24 pages, 370 KB  
Article
“So Much Comes Up”: Emotion Regulation in Psychotherapy Addressing Existential, Spiritual and Religious Themes
by Joke C. van Nieuw Amerongen, Carolien van Stam, Anne-Mieke Romkes-Bart, Arjan W. Braam, Hanneke Schaap-Jonker and Bart van den Brink
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(5), 685; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16050685 - 30 Apr 2026
Viewed by 426
Abstract
Existential, spiritual, and religious themes often evoke strong emotions in therapy, yet little is known about how clients’ emotion regulation relates to these aspects. Spiritual psychotherapy for inpatient residential and intensive treatment (SPIRIT) integrates meaning in life within a cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) framework [...] Read more.
Existential, spiritual, and religious themes often evoke strong emotions in therapy, yet little is known about how clients’ emotion regulation relates to these aspects. Spiritual psychotherapy for inpatient residential and intensive treatment (SPIRIT) integrates meaning in life within a cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) framework in acute and intensive mental health care and provides an appropriate context for examining this. This qualitative study explores: (1) clients’ beliefs about expressing, managing, or suppressing emotions related to meaning in life, spirituality, or religion (MSR); (2) how emotion regulation strategies (e.g., reappraisal, acceptance, and distress tolerance) are influenced by addressing MSR in therapy; and (3) whether engaging with MSR activates emotion regulation mechanisms for clients’ experienced distress. We analyzed 118 client evaluation forms and 19 semi-structured client interviews using a thematic approach informed by emotion regulation theory. SPIRIT-CBT made implicit beliefs about (MSR-related) emotion regulation explicit, and group interactions sometimes led to changes. Clients showed various regulation strategies, for example: MSR-based reappraisal, connectedness, reflection, and positive refocusing. However, emotional tension and suppression were also reported. Particularly from the interviews, it emerged that the therapy facilitated regulation mechanisms, including narrative processing, perspective shifting, sense-making, and social belonging. Focusing on MSR and existential themes addresses an important gap in mental health care and may contribute to supporting clients’ emotional recovery and overall well-being. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Unpacking Clients’ Beliefs About Emotion Regulation in Therapy)
Back to TopTop