Next Article in Journal
Shortcomings of Transforming a Local Circular Economy System through Industrial Symbiosis: A Case Study in Spanish SMEs
Next Article in Special Issue
Performance Analysis of Photovoltaic Integrated Shading Devices (PVSDs) and Semi-Transparent Photovoltaic (STPV) Devices Retrofitted to a Prototype Office Building in a Hot Desert Climate
Previous Article in Journal
Behaviors also Trickle Back: An Assessment of Customer Dysfunctional Behavior on Employees and Customers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Potential and Future Prospects of Geothermal Energy in Space Conditioning of Buildings: India and Worldwide Review

1
CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 247667, India
2
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India
3
S.A.P. Automations India Pvt Ltd., Delhi 110092, India
4
Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK
5
College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Renewable Energy, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK
6
Renewable Energy, Stella Turk Building, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(20), 8428; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208428
Submission received: 31 August 2020 / Revised: 8 October 2020 / Accepted: 9 October 2020 / Published: 13 October 2020

Abstract

:
This paper presents modern trends in geothermal energy utilization, mainly focusing on ground source heat (GSH) pumps for space conditioning in buildings. This paper focuses on India along with a general review of studies around the world. Space conditioning of a building contributes to about 40–50% of the total energy consumed in buildings and has an adverse impact on the environment and human health. The India Cooling Action Plan (ICAP) estimates that the demand for electricity for heating and cooling of buildings will increase by over 700% in India at current levels by 2047 with an additional 800 GW of power generation capacity needed just to meet heating and cooling needs by 2050, of which about 70% is required for the residential sector only. It further intensifies as the demand for peak electric load sharply increases in summer because of the extensive use of building air conditioning systems. Researchers across the globe have tried different cooling systems and found that some systems can offer a certain amount of energy-efficient performance, and also occupant comfort. Therefore, this article examines the geothermal potential in buildings for space conditioning by critically reviewing experimental and numerical studies along with the future prospects of GSH pumps.

1. Introduction

Buildings constitute roughly 40% of the world’s total energy requirements and 30% of carbon dioxide emissions [1,2,3,4,5]. Currently, most of the space-conditioning systems consume high-grade energy generated from fossil fuels that lead to an increase in greenhouse gas emissions, resulting in global warming issues and climate change around the world. Choi et al. [6] reviewed various sectors of energy and found that major sources of emission are the building, transport, and industry sector. Cook et al. [7], Anderegg et al. [8], and Oreskes [9] have reported consensus amongst the scientific community about human activities for heating the Earth’s surface and human beings are accountable for global warming. Dino and Akgül [10] investigated various residential buildings having a large share of CO2 emissions and projected that by 2060 the annual mean temperature is expected to rise by 3–3.5 °C and the ambient temperature is likely to increase by 1.8–3.2 °C. Gonseth et al. [11] analyzed the energy need for space conditioning and effect on climate change, inferring that in the future there will be a huge thermal discomfort for the people living in buildings without space conditioning. This alarming situation around the world has forced researchers to study and develop systems based on renewable energy sources. Kuczyński and Staszczuk [12] investigated how cooling demand gets affected by the wall thickness of residential buildings, and noticed that it can be reduced up to 67% at constant temperature conditions by increasing the thickness of the walls. Space conditioning in extremely cold weather regions and warm/hot weather conditions is always critical for researchers, and thus requires prerequisite treatment using building physics principles, materials, etc.
To overcome these challenges, an effective system design is essential for such types of complex problems. Various researchers addressed the problem seriously looking into the future of extreme cold and warm regions and also keeping in mind depleting conventional sources of energy. Dhepe and Krishna [13] reviewed geothermal systems for space conditioning as a potential alternative to conventional systems. They have reported that about 30% of the total electricity is consumed by the commercial and residential sector out of which about 64% of the electricity is utilized by heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. For addressing these issues, Singh et al. [14] analyzed the geothermal potential resources of India; as India is growing rapidly among the developing countries in terms of both energy production and energy demands. Figure 1 shows the geothermal potential map of India and investigated geothermal sites. Based on tectonic elements of India and the heat flow gradient, seven geothermal provinces of India are identified as Himalayan, Sohana, West-Coast, Gujarat-Rajasthan, Godavari, Mahanadi, and Sonata geothermal provinces [14], as shown in Figure 1.
Therefore, a systematic methodology is followed in this article to explore the potential of geothermal energy for space conditioning in buildings in India and around the world. Figure 2 shows the research articles, technical reports, and review articles published in English and available on the Internet that are related to numerical and experimental studies on ground source heat pump and boreholes techniques during the last fifteen years (2005–2020) worldwide. It indicates how the research has evolved over the last two decades in the field of geothermal energy. Data for the analysis has been taken from various scientific journals, which include scientific papers, review papers, and technical reports.
Figure 3 shows the market deployment and development of the various renewable energy technologies in the market, as well as the current situation of the various technologies around the world. Data for the analysis has been taken from the International Energy Agency Report 2007-Energy Policy [16]. From Figure 3, it can be inferred that some of the renewable energy technologies are still in the early market phase, therefore, there is a need to analyze the potential of other renewable energy sources.

2. Potential of Renewable Energy

Seyboth et al. [16] have reported space conditioning applications in the different building sectors and its benefits from renewable energy are very broad. Although their cost also varies from place to place, almost all renewable technologies are very much competitive with conventional systems, on their operational cost and direct benefits to the environment. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA) [17], in 2009, heat or thermal energy accounted for 47% of the total energy used worldwide and challenges are still there to employ the renewable energy sources. For overcoming these types of barriers, more attention is to be made on policy design. Moreover, investment in renewable heat and energy efficiency affects when it comes to the end-user although investors are the same in both cases most of the time, energy efficiency plays a very important role in attracting investments. The role of governments is highlighted to make economic incentives and subsidies on various renewable technologies. Therefore, more and more people will get attracted to the resource and development will take a long jump when demands get boosted.
Laine et al. [18] have published that during the 21st century the global cooling demand will increase significantly due to many factors and will contribute to the advancement of global warming. The residential cooling sector will be the major driving factor for the increase in demand. Sachs et al. [19] inferred that cooling demand is mainly influenced by climatic conditions, geography, population density, and the selection of cooling systems are influenced by available energy distribution systems. Aghniaey and Lawrence [20] investigated how cooling demand affects the thermal comfort of the occupant. The studies showed how cooling needs will lead to the development of new technologies. The 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) designed by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) [21] emphasize sustainable cooling to the markets in a cost-effective manner. Therefore, sustainable cooling is targeted for the 21st century. India is the first country that launched the India Cooling Action Plan (ICAP) in 2019 for a long-term vision, seeing the importance of cooling in the economic growth and productivity [22]. ICAP focuses on steps to be taken for reducing cooling demand in the country. Furthermore, the focus will be on reducing cooling demand by 25 and 30% reduction in refrigerant demand over the next 20 years. This is in line with global climate change initiatives for reducing global warming. The SDGs are in line with ICAP and include nationwide productivity, reducing cooling energy requirements in the next 20 years, reducing stress on power systems, reducing leakage of refrigerants, and making safer working places. All these goals can only be achieved by using a 100% potential of renewable energy sources available on Earth. To achieve these goals, the geothermal energy resource is to be reviewed for space conditioning in buildings, as this is the most important driving factor for an increase in energy demand.

3. Geothermal Energy

3.1. Role of Geothermal Energy in Space Conditioning

Molavi and McDaniel [23] reviewed the benefit of replacing the conventional HVAC systems with the geothermal central HVAC systems. Challenges reported by the authors in using geothermal energy with a central HVAC are expensive machinery, extensive soil and environment testing, and difficulties in the designing stage. Vibhute et al. [24] have discussed the geothermal HVAC system and found that a conventional air conditioning unit utilizes much more energy than the geothermal space conditioning system and is up to 50% energy efficient. The geothermal space conditioning system is reliable and durable up to the life of 50 years for the underground piping and heat pump up to 20 years of life. Yu et al. [25] concluded that geothermal cooling systems are feasible with zero external energy consumption. Fathizadeh and Seim [26] have done a comparison between conventional HVAC and geothermal systems along with estimating, designing, and calculating geothermal heating and air conditioning of residential houses or small businesses in Indiana, USA and concluded that geothermal systems are more efficient in larger installation areas.

3.2. Worldwide Scenario

Developed countries have been giving grants to the residential sector to use geothermal HVAC so that their national grid needs do not increase at an alarming rate. D’Agostino and Mazzarella [27] analyzed the targets of Europe to reduce greenhouse emissions from buildings by 80% by 2050. According to the analyses, the UK has committed 100% of their buildings to be nearly zero energy buildings by 2050 and 70% by 2030. This would have control over energy use and emission. Similarly, Germany and the UN recommending the same, geothermal exchange coupled with building physics is the shortest route to achieve nearly zero energy buildings (nZEBs). As per the World Geothermal Congress 2015 (WGC2015), the globally installed capacity of geothermal is 592,638TJ which is an increase of 39.8% as compared to the World Geothermal Congress 2010 [28]. The major utilization capacity is contributed by five countries; China (174,352 TJ/year), USA (75,862 TJ/year), Sweden (51,920 TJ/year), Turkey (45,892 TJ/year), and Iceland (26,717 TJ/year) accounting for about 65.8% of the world capacity. Gong and Werner [29] reported an analysis in which they showed the gradual shifting of researchers from nuclear energy to geothermal and solar energy.
Indonesia [30] possesses the world’s foremost geothermal potential at 40% of the world’s geothermal energy but only 4.5% is being utilized for generating electricity. The study concludes that there is a huge potential at geothermal sites in Indonesia to explore and extract energy from the ground for different applications. Table 1 shows the installed capacity of geothermal along with key results reported in the literature around the world with specified locations.
Fernández [40] discussed three different countries using geothermal energy as space conditioning in their supermarkets and analyzed the percentage reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, as well as in energy consumption: (i) Germany used the shallow geothermal technology supermarket and recorded energy consumption reduction up to 45%, whereas a reduction in carbon dioxide emission was recorded up to 28%; (ii) Portuguese conventional space conditioning systems were replaced by the GSHP system for space conditioning and a 30% reduction of energy consumption and 30% reduction of carbon dioxide emission were possible; (iii) Turkish supermarkets use stored thermal energy in an aquifer and integrated it into heat ventilation and the air conditioning system which recorded a reduction in energy consumption and about 36% reduction in carbon dioxide emission. The study concludes that utilization of geothermal energy will help in reducing carbon emissions.

3.3. Indian Scenario

In India, utilization of geothermal energy is still in an immature stage where only a few authors have tried to explore the geothermal energy potential for space conditioning. Shahare and Harinarayana [39] analyzed geothermal based space conditioning with the heat exchanger by using a shallow process for cooling in summer and solar energy as the major source for space heating during winter, and validated it with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling and proposed a hybrid way to do it with the help of geothermal and solar energy. The tropical climate in India makes it susceptible to a heavy load of energy that ultimately affects the environment which can be mitigated by employing geothermal cooling.
Dhepe and Krishna [13] have done a literature review on geothermal cooling and heating systems and the advancements in this field. The increasing demand for energy leads to more exploration of renewable energy technologies. Geothermal heating and cooling is the new advancement in the field of HVAC. The analysis of geothermal ground source heat pump shows that 51% of electricity can be saved with the help of these pumps. Their longer life and lower maintenance also play an important role in early acceptance of the technology. Badgujar et al. [41] reviewed the work done by various researchers in the field of implementation, application, dynamic simulation, and modeling of the geothermal system and proposed that further research is needed to explore the potential of geothermal energy for a different typology of buildings in various regions in India with different ground temperatures, as well as to develop generic models for different built-up area buildings with quantified performance. Figure 4 shows how geothermal energy storage takes place. In Figure 4a, the borehole thermal energy storage is shown, which is used mostly for closed loop applications with multiple borehole heat exchangers. In Figure 4b, the aquifer thermal energy storage is shown, which operates as wells.
Figure 5 shows the direct utilization of geothermal energy in different ways with heat pumps showing an exchange from different exchange mediums. Shallow geothermal systems extract heat energy from the ground for supplying to the buildings and other purposes. It can be a closed-loop or open-loop system, as shown in Figure 5. In many regions, cooling with the help of a ground source heat pump is gaining more interest [42]. Mostly, closed-loop systems are used in which ground heat is exchanged with the help of fluid flowing through tubes, boreholes, energy piles, etc. Ground source heat (GSH) pump is shown in Figure 5a with a horizontal heat exchanger mainly used for a shallow geothermal (for depth < 5 m). In Figure 5b, the GSH pump with a vertical borehole heat exchanger for depth greater than 10m is shown. In Figure 5c, energy piles are shown with multiple vertical boreholes installed in the foundation of new buildings. In Figure 5d, the open-loop (GWHP) is shown, which utilizes groundwater directly as a heat carrier.

3.3.1. Challenges

The HVAC systems are being used in very large numbers in the building sector with a trend showing a significant increase in the future. Therefore, to decrease energy consumption and minimize the adverse impact on the environment, the correct combination of building physics, geothermal, and solar energy to decarbonize the HVAC solution has to be deployed and is the biggest challenge among the researchers. Especially in India, a geothermal closed vertical ground loop is a relatively grey area to design an efficient cooling system for hot climates around the year without exploiting much of the conventional resources. Researchers have tried different systems and found that some systems can offer an energy-efficient performance along with occupant comfort but the challenge is the hybridization of such systems.

3.3.2. Opportunities in Ladakh, India

As shown in a geothermal potential map of India (Figure 1), extremely cold climate conditions of Ladakh region have a huge geothermal potential to explore as an opportunity in India, where the use of various conventional sources for heating the space is deteriorating people’s health, the temperature remains below 0°C for more than seven months. Irregular rainfalls in this region lead to a shortfall of potable water. Conventional fuels such as LPG, coal, kerosene, etc. are costly due to the high transportation cost. On the other hand, extracted energy by combustion of fossil fuels is poor due to the lack of sufficient oxygen at an altitude above 2500 m. Hence, there is a need to develop environment-friendly sustainable technologies for heating of buildings such as geothermal to overcome the existing problems and develop generic models for different built-up area buildings with payback and quantified guarantees.

4. Study on Ground Source Heat Pump

GSH pumps may further resolve numerous environmental issues. This exploration of renewable resource has started back in the 1940s that continue with modifications. Table 2 gives an overview of the research papers on GSH pumps reviewed and analyzes the advancements and categorizes them majorly based on energy and CO2 emission reduction, coefficient of performance (COP), and energy efficiency ratio (EER), i.e., the ratio of useful heating and cooling provided to the work required. Since the installation cost is higher compared to some of the conventional systems, therefore, contemplating the payback period becomes necessary.
Figure 6 shows the processes involved in the machine room of the ground source heat pump with the help of a Carnot cycle: At point A, the evaporator will increase the temperature of the refrigerant with the help of a buffer tank and then the refrigerant will move to the compressor and this cycle will be repeated; at point B, the temperature and pressure of the compressed refrigerant (in the form of gas) is high; at point C, the brine solution will take the energy from the refrigerant; at point D, the rejection of heat takes place; at point E, the temperature of the refrigerant will be lower and the pressure will be high; at point F, the expansion of the refrigerant takes place; at point G, the temperature and pressure of the refrigerant (in the form of liquid) is lower; and point H is the buffer tan. In Figure 6, AHU is the air handling unit and FCU is the fan coil unit; whereas, Figure 7 shows the types of heat exchangers used in the GSH pump. Figure 7a shows the vertical ground heat exchanger (also known as a borehole) used for longer depths. Figure 7b shows the horizontal ground heat exchanger, mostly used for depth less than 1.5 m. With proper arrangements, a combination of the horizontal and vertical system can also be used. Figure 7c shows the spiral ground heat exchanger (GHE).
Table 3 summarizes the various important studies based on a vertical single U type borehole used in the GSH pump and various other parameters used are shown while designing the boreholes.
Athresha et al. [50] discussed a comparative study of GSH pump with conventional systems for the same heating demand of the modern boiler with an efficiency of 90% and the GSH pump system that will produce 400% more energy for the same amount of energy consumed by the boiler with a COP ≈ 3.9.

4.1. Numerical Approach

A numerical model based on finite elements, that was developed by Farel and Basu [60], showed how water flow in the ground affects the temperature of soil surrounding the geothermal pile. The numerical HVAC modeling system for GSH pumps (thermal response test of ground thermal properties) and WSHP (Tai lake water temperature was used in this case) for a particular building model located in China. The 3D model of this building is substituted as the input. The authors have analyzed the performance of the GSH pump system for various types of building models. Studies showed that there is a notable increase in the ground temperature near the heat exchanger as a result of an imbalance of heat due to the release in summer and absorption during winter (thermal plume).
When a major part of the energy share in the European Union (EU) is covered by building heating and cooling, a need for the replacement of fossil fuel by a renewable and sustainable source is at high demand. The response surface method (RSM), a statistical approach has been discussed by authors [61] with the help of the heat transfer and energy balance equation, mathematical models, EAHE (Earth to air heat exchanger) model considering three influential variables in the context of heating and cooling of buildings. Shu et al. [62] investigated how the groundwater flow for geothermal development is being affected by boundary conditions in hilly areas. FEFLOW, a 3D heat water finite element based model was developed to study how boundary conditions affect the temperature fields and hydrodynamics of aquifers. Table 4 shows the tools used for modeling and simulation of various systems.

4.2. Implementation of GSH Pumps in Buildings

Neves et al. [43] simulated a building for the assessment of energy savings that was done by replacing an electric system with a geothermal heat pump system. It has been established that there is almost a 26% reduction in energy use by the replacement of a geothermal heat pump system. Barbaresi et al. [74] studied a different application of geothermal heat exchanger for greenhouse cultivation. In this, a low enthalpy geothermal system is used and analyzed with the help of geothermal heat exchanger and ground source heat pumps in winter for heating in the greenhouses to reduce energy needs, the cost of the process, and take care of CO2 emissions.
A case study was discussed by Kim et al. [75] comparing the economic factors such as energy consumption, cost between existing three different buildings so that energy savings and cost in incorporating geothermal energy can be estimated. The lifecycle cost (LCC) analysis was also done to check the economic feasibility of installing the system and infers that the system can be selected based on energy consumption and costs or energy cost reduction effect related to a geothermal application.
The Middle East countries [54] such as Egypt, Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, etc. with a never-ending vast developmental process requires continuous energy supply for cooling and ventilation and fluctuating energy needs and accelerated demand due to a significant increase in high rise buildings at a prominent pace. An analysis was performed by Salem and Hashim [54] based on a 20-year life cycle and they came up with the fact that commercial buildings in Dubai had to save energy usage and operating cost with an 8-year payback period.
Hospitals are one of the major energy-consuming buildings, and using renewable energy sources can be a way ahead to sustainability approach [76]. A case study of 300 bedded hospitals considerably signifies that all these renewable energy sources can lead to nearly zero carbon dioxide emissions, in the long run, it is both a cost and energy saving alternative.
A detailed study on the modeling of thermally interactive multiple boreholes was conducted [61] and the authors investigated the sustainability, environmental impact, and optimized the performance of the system. As thermal anomalies increase due to the unbalanced heat extraction and injection, it causes local cooling of the ground, which can be mitigated by adjusting seasonal heating and cooling workloads. Ramos et al. [77] have investigated many implemented projects of the GSH pump around the world and concluded that this can be the most sustainable method to opt for space conditioning applications in buildings. Verhoeven et al. [78] have converted a small geothermal project to a large sustainable hybrid structure for heating and cooling.
Therefore, from the above studies, it can be inferred that there is a need to carry out the study on space heating and cooling from GSH pumps and hybridization on the way to nZEBs.

4.3. Comparative Study of GSH Pump

Researchers investigated certain boreholes of German cities having depth of 20m, where the groundwater temperature reaches 13 to 18 °C [79]. The study concludes that GSH pumps systems are efficient, sustainable, and have the potential for space conditioning applications. Table 5 shows the comparison of the GSH pump with various other systems available in the market. In Table 5 the GSH pump is compared with two-pipe fan coils, four-pipe fan coils, packaged terminal air conditioners (PTAC)/packaged terminal heat pump (PTHP), and variable air volume (VAV) control system. Studies investigated concluded that GSH pumps are more efficient and feasible to use over other systems. In terms of ease of design and installation, GSH pumps are highly efficient. The maintenance and operating costs of GSH pumps are very low when compared with other systems.

5. Future Prospects of Geothermal Energy Hybrid Systems

The studies reviewed above inferred that geothermal energy is a renewable, reliable, environmentally-friendly, sustainable energy available almost everywhere around the world. Thus, hybridization between two or more renewable energy sources might be the solution. The comparison between the different hybrid geothermal systems showed that each system has its characteristics. The combination of geothermal energy with other renewable sources is the most preferable hybridization, especially from an environmental point of view. On the other hand, it is quite important to mention that the efficiency, COP and plant capital, and operating costs are not only related to the energy sources used but there are several other factors such as soil properties, ambient conditions, drilling cost, materials, equipment, cycle conditions, and heat transfer enhancement of working fluid [80,81]. The use of a renewable source of energy will help reduce the ozone layer depletion and other pollution hazards on our ecological system [82,83]. The major requirements for low energy buildings using geothermal and other sources of energy as the source for space conditioning and domestic hot/cold water needs are to be standardized.
Figure 8 shows various steps needed for achieving a nearly zero energy building with the help of hybrid systems and geothermal space conditioning systems. From this figure, the hybridization approach is suggested which shows that for achieving ultra-low energy buildings, three important factors to be considered are—Building Physics, Generation with renewable sources, and Distribution. For complying airtightness in buildings, the MVHR (mechanical ventilation with heat recovery) system is installed, as MVHR will help in reducing heat losses from stale air and maintains a constant fresh air supply in buildings [84]. Other important considerations in building physics are shown in the flow chart to reduce the thermal load of the building. The thermal load will help in analyzing further calculations for the space conditioning in buildings, as shown in the flow diagram. Finally, by selecting the suitable methods and technology, ultra-low energy buildings or nearly zero energy buildings (nZEBs) are achieved.
In the context of cooling of buildings, EAHEs (Earth to air heat exchangers) can also be used for a hot and humid climate with the above technologies. EAHEs are the systems in which air is passed through the pipe (buried under the Earth) with the help of a blower and outlet of the pipe is connected to the building for cooling. Wei et al. [85] investigated that increasing the depth and reducing the diameter of the EAHE pipe will result in a decrease in the outlet temperature and moisture content of the air.

Hybrid System for Solving Problems of Energy Shortage for High Energy Requirements

Hybrid systems with a solar PV (Photovoltaic) integrated with the ground source heat pump system may help in solving energy shortage problems, particularly for high energy requirements [86]. The optimization of the system parameters can be done by using software/tools available for assessing the efficiency and payback time of the proposed system. For simulation, e-QUEST or Energy Plus Software can be used to determine the heating and cooling load and energy consumption.
Figure 9 shows that the solar PV can be utilized for the GSH pump for solving problems of energy shortage. Therefore, further research is needed to develop various space conditioning generic designs for different types of buildings having different built-up areas and to validate the system under real-time conditions. The systems can be optimized for maintaining comfort parameters. The payback period studies are also desirable to establish the life cycle cost of the hybrid systems to establish the superiority of these systems in the longer periods.

6. Conclusions and Remarks

This review paper focused on various low energy consuming and low refrigerant usage systems, which can effectively deliver space conditioning comfort parameters in line with SDG goals and ICAP goals of India. In the process, this will help in reducing the heat urban island (HIU) or usage of ODP refrigerants, thereby reducing the global warming potential (GWP) and effectively addressing climate change. This will also be in line with the Paris Climate Change Agreement and Kigali Amendment with two main foci—energy consumption and refrigerant use with goals: 25–40% reduction in cooling energy requirements and 25–30% reduction in refrigerant demand. Therefore, the focus on a hybrid solar-geothermal for space conditioning is explored, which is 65% of the building energy consumption parameter to use as a primary tool in low energy buildings or nZEBs.
Most of the parts of India are hot, warm, and humid, thereby this will not only increase the cooling degree days but also reduce the peak load demand. The researchers take cognizance of the fact that future buildings must be capable of mitigating the peak load, especially through building physics. In a country as hot as India and with longer cooling degree days, it is pertinent to use the best possible thermal exchange in the form of GSH pumps with vertical probes and run the mechanical systems with solar-generated electricity especially during the business as usual (BAU) hours.
The climate change parameters focus on the facts that India will figure out a strategy for combining building physics, geothermal exchange, and solar generation to eventually reach low carbon and low energy parameters as the world is heading towards it by 2030. India has a fair knowledge of building physics and the standards compared to world-class material and knowledge but the missing link is low energy, low refrigerant, and low emission space conditioning systems with domestic hot water (DHW) systems in cogeneration. Hence, the necessity is to study quickly and find out the GSH pumps in conjunction with the two other interventions. It is estimated that in the next 20 years India will build 1.3 billion square meters of the built-up area mostly in urban areas that will feature space conditioning as a major design parameter. Therefore, it is pertinent to have the know-how and feature of GSH pumps exchange as the primary intervention in space conditioning in the pursuit of low energy buildings or nZEBs. Moreover, this will have sizable contributions on the economy by saving the KW or MW. The low enthalpy geothermal exchange can be done in any climatic condition, and hence our focus is on space conditioning and domestic hot water (DHW). Areas such as Ladakh can benefit immensely from the geothermal exchanges and solar generation combinations solving the existing problems of many years.
A detailed review on the GSH pump system potential for space conditioning in buildings shows that the installed capacity of GSH pump systems has increased during the last two decades with applications of geothermal energy on the HVAC system and ground-coupled heat pump technology, concentrated on GSH pump systems and their impact on buildings. This study shows that GSH pumps have a huge potential in space conditioning and water heating over conventional systems. It could play a significant role in reducing CO2 emissions, refrigerant use, energy demand, human health, dipping global warming, etc.
The geothermal exchange addresses the problem of UHI and coupled with building physics, it will reduce the quantum of heat that needs to be rejected into the ground. The proper geothermal exchange design will ensure that there is no rejection of heat into the atmosphere.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.S.M.; formal analysis, C.S.M. and V.A.; investigation, C.S.M., T.A., and V.A.; resources, C.S.M.; data curation, V.A.; writing—original draft preparation, C.S.M. and V.A.; writing—review and editing, C.S.M., A.K. (Ashok Kumar), A.G. (Arijit Ghosh), A.K. (Anuj Kumar), A.G. (Aritra Ghosh), and V.A.; supervision, C.S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The article is published with the permission of Director, CSIR—Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee. The help extended by Garima Bhanot and Simran Taneja in preparing the figures/drawings is also acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dincer, I.; Acar, C. A review on clean energy solutions for better sustainability. Int. J. Energy Res. 2015, 39, 585–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nejat, P.; Jomehzadeh, F.; Taheri, M.M.; Gohari, M.; Majid, M.Z.A. A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries). Renew Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 43, 843–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lechtenböhmer, S.; Schüring, A. The potential for large-scale savings from insulating residential buildings in the EU. Energy Effic. 2011, 4, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cabeza, L.F.; Rincón, L.; Vilariño, V.; Pérez, G.; Castell, A. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review. Renew Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 29, 394–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Outlook SAE. World Energy Outlook Special Report; France International Energy Agency (IEA): Paris, France, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  6. Choi, D.; Gao, Z.; Jiang, W. Attention to global warming. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2020, 33, 1112–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cook, J.; Nuccitelli, D.; Green, S.A.; Richardson, M.; Winkler, B.; Painting, R.; Way, R.; Jacobs, P.; Skuce, A. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 024024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Anderegg, W.R.; Prall, J.W.; Harold, J.; Schneider, S.H. Expert credibility in climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 12107–12109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Oreskes, N. The scientific consensus on climate change. Science 2004, 306, 1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Dino, I.G.; Akgül, C.M. Impact of climate change on the existing residential building stock in Turkey: An analysis on energy use, greenhouse gas emissions and occupant comfort. Renew Energy 2019, 141, 828–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gonseth, C.; Thalmann, P.; Vielle, M. Impacts of global warming on energy use for heating and cooling with full rebound effects in Switzerland. Swiss J. Econ. Stat. 2017, 153, 341–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Kuczyński, T.; Staszczuk, A. Experimental study of the influence of thermal mass on thermal comfort and cooling energy demand in residential buildings. Energy 2020, 195, 116984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dhepe, N.; Krishna, R. A Review of the Advancements in Geothermal Heating and Cooling System. J. Alt. Energy Sour. Technol. 2017, 8, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Singh, H.K.; Chandrasekharam, D.; Trupti, G.; Mohite, P.; Singh, B.; Varun, C.; Sinha, S.K. Potential geothermal energy resources of India: A review. Curr. Sustain. Renew. Energy Rep. 2016, 3, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chandrasekharam, D.; Chandrasekhar, V. Geothermal Energy Resources, India: Country Update; World Geothermal Congress: Bali, Indonesia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  16. Seyboth, K.; Beurskens, L.; Langniss, O.; Sims, R.E. Recognizing the potential for renewable energy heating and cooling. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 2460–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. World Energy Outlook; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2009.
  18. Laine, H.S.; Salpakari, J.; Looney, E.E.; Savin, H.; Peters, I.M.; Buonassisi, T. Meeting global cooling demand with photovoltaics during the 21st century. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 2706–2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sachs, J.; Moya, D.; Giarola, S.; Hawkes, A. Clustered spatially and temporally resolved global heat and cooling energy demand in the residential sector. Appl. Energy 2019, 250, 48–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aghniaey, S.; Lawrence, T.M. The impact of increased cooling setpoint temperature during demand response events on occupant thermal comfort in commercial buildings: A review. Energy Build. 2018, 173, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. A Report by Environmental Rights and Governance; United Nations Environmental Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2019.
  22. India Cooling Action Plan (ICAP). Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, India. 2019. Available online: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1568328 (accessed on 9 October 2020).
  23. Molavi, J.; McDaniel, J. A Review of the Benefits of Geothermal Heat Pump Systems in Retail Buildings. Procedia Eng. 2016, 145, 1135–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Vibhute, A.M.; Shaikh, S.M.; Patil, A.M. Geothermal Energy: Utilization as a Heat Pump. Civil Mec. Eng. 2009, 21–25. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yu, Y.; Li, H.; Niu, F.; Yu, D. Investigation of coupled geothermal cooling system with earth tube and solar chimney. Appl. Energy 2014, 114, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fathizadeh, M.; Seim, D. Design and Implementation of Geothermal Systems for Heating and Air Conditioning. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, San Francisco, CA, USA, 23–25 October 2013; Volume 1, pp. 23–25. [Google Scholar]
  27. D’Agostino, D.; Mazzarella, L. What is a nearly zero energy building? Overview, implementation and comparison of definitions. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 21, 200–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lund, J.W.; Boyd, T.L. Direct utilization of geothermal energy 2015 worldwide review. Geothermics 2016, 60, 66–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gong, M.; Werner, S. An assessment of district heating research in China. Renew Energy 2015, 84, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bin, S.M.; Jalilinasrabady, S.; Fujii, H.; Pambudi, N.A. Classification of geothermal resources in Indonesia by applying exergy concept. Renew Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 93, 499–506. [Google Scholar]
  31. Soltani, M.; Kashkooli, F.M.; Dehghani-Sanij, A.R.; Kazemi, A.R.; Bordbar, N.; Farshchi, M.J.; Elmi, M.; Gharali, K.; Dusseault, M.B. A comprehensive study of geothermal heating and cooling systems. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 44, 793–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Beerepoot, M.; Marmion, A. Policies for Renewable Heat: An Integrated Approach; International Energy Agency, OECD Library: Paris, France, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  33. Demirbaş, A. Global renewable energy resources. Energy Sour. 2006, 28, 779–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lund, J.W.; Freeston, D.H.; Boyd, T.L. Direct application of geothermal energy: 2005 worldwide review. Geothermics 2005, 34, 691–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Melikoglu, M. Geothermal energy in Turkey and around the World: A review of the literature and an analysis based on Turkey’s Vision 2023 energy targets. Renew Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 76, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sivasakthivel, T.; Murugesan, K.; Thomas, H.R. Optimization of operating parameters of ground source heat pump system for space heating and cooling by Taguchi method and utility concept. Appl. Energy 2014, 116, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Frick, S.; Kranz, S.; Kupfermann, G.; Saadat, A.; Huenges, E. Making use of geothermal brine in Indonesia: Binary demonstration power plant Lahendong/Pangolombian. Geotherm. Energy 2019, 7, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Feng, W.; Zhang, Q.; Ji, H.; Wang, R.; Zhou, N.; Ye, Q.; Hao, B.; Li, Y.; Luo, D.; Lau, S.S.Y. A review of net zero energy buildings in hot and humid climates: Experience learned from 34 case study buildings. Renew Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 114, 109303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shahare, S.; Harinarayana, T. Energy efficient air conditioning system using geothermal cooling-solar heating in Gujarat, India. J. Power Energy Eng. 2015, 4, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Fernández, J.C.R. Integration capacity of geothermal energy in supermarkets through case analysis. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2019, 34, 49–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Badgujar, J.P.; Kulkarni, D.D.; Ahmad, S.A.; Siddiqui, F.; Thakur, P. Ground Coupled Heat Exchanger Air Conditioning System: A Study. IJSER 2017, 8, 2229–5518. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bayer, P.; Attard, G.; Blum, P.; Menberg, K. The geothermal potential of cities. Renew Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 106, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Neves, R.; Cho, H.; Zhang, J. Techno-economic analysis of geothermal system in residential building in Memphis, Tennessee. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 27, 100993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Olabi, A.G.; Mahmoud, M.; Soudan, B.; Wilberforce, T.; Ramadan, M. Geothermal based hybrid energy systems, toward eco-friendly energy approaches. Renew Energy 2020, 147, 2003–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kljajić, M.V.; Anđelković, A.S.; Hasik, V.; Munćan, V.M.; Bilec, M. Shallow geothermal energy integration in district heating system: An example from Serbia. Renew Energy 2020, 147, 2791–2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mao, Q.; Chen, Y. Experimental investigation of thermal performance of a ground source heat pump system for spring season. Energy Build. 2017, 152, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lee, J.S.; Kim, H.C.; Im, S.Y. Comparative Analysis between District Heating and Geothermal Heat Pump System. Energy Procedia 2017, 116, 403–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, X.; Hong, T. Comparison of energy efficiency between variable refrigerant flow systems and ground source heat pump systems. Energy Build. 2010, 42, 584–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zhao, W.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Su, W.; Li, B.; Fu, Z. Experimental heating performances of ground source heat pump (GSHP) for heating road units. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2020, 7, 100040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Athresha, A.P.; Al-Habaibeha, A.; Parkerb, K. Innovative approach for heating of buildings using water from a flooded coal mine through an open loop based single shaft GSHP system. Energy Procedia 2015, 75, 1221–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Franzen, I.; Nedar, L.; Andersson, M. Environmental Comparison of Energy Solutions for Heating and Cooling. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Momin, G.G. Experimental Investigation of Geothermal Air Conditioning. Eng. Res. 2013, 2, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
  53. Gao, Y.; Peng, Y.; Liu, J. Comprehensive Benefit Analysis of Direct Expansion Ground Source Heat Pump System. Energy Power Eng. 2013, 5, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Salem, A.; Hashim, H.E.M. A Feasibility of Geothermal Cooling in the Middle East. Latest Trends Sustain. Green Dev. 2010, 105–112. [Google Scholar]
  55. Bu, X.; Jiang, K.; Li, H. Performance of geothermal single well for intermittent heating. Energy 2019, 186, 115858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bayer, P.; Paly, M.; Beck, M. Strategic optimization of borehole heat exchanger field for seasonal geothermal heating and cooling. Appl. Energy 2014, 136, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cocchi, S.; Castellucci, S.; Tucci, A. Modeling of an Air Conditioning System with Geothermal Heat Pump for a Residential Building. Math. Probl. Eng. 2013, 781231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ma, W.; Kim, M.K.; Hao, J. Numerical Simulation Modeling of a GSHP and WSHP System for an Office Building in the Hot Summer and Cold Winter Region of China: A Case Study in Suzhou. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Zhai, X.Q.; Cheng, X.W.; Wang, R.Z. Heating and cooling performance of a minitype ground source heat pump system. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 111, 1366–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Farel, O.G.; Basu, S.M. Numerical Modeling of Thermally Induced Pore Water Flow in Saturated Soil Surrounding Geothermal Piles. Am. Soc. Civil. Eng. 2015, 1668–1677. [Google Scholar]
  61. Maoz, A.S.; Muhammad, N.; Amin, A.; Sohaib, M.; Basit, A.; Ahmad, T. Parametric Optimization of Earth to Air Heat Exchanger Using Response Surface Method. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Shu, L.; Xiao, R.; Wen, Z.; Tao, Y.; Liu, P. Impact of Boundary Conditions on a Groundwater Heat Pump System Design in a Shallow and Thin Aquifer near the River. Sustainability 2017, 9, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Akbari, M.; Mahmoudi, S.M.S.; Yari, M.; Rosen, M.A. Energy and Exergy Analyses of a New Combined Cycle for Producing Electricity and Desalinated Water Using Geothermal Energy. Sustainability 2014, 6, 1796–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Noorollahi, Y.; Arjenaki, H.G.; Ghasempour, R. Thermo-economic modelling and GIS-based spatial data analysis of ground source heat pump systems for regional shallow geothermal mapping. Renew Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 72, 648–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Stegnar, G.; Stanicic, D.; Cesena, M.; Cizman, J.; Pestotnik, S.; Prestor, J.; Urbancic, A.; Merse, S. A framework for assessing the technical and economic potential of shallow geothermal energy in individual and district heating systems: A case study of Slovenia. Energy 2019, 180, 405–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, L.; Chao, J.; Geng, S.; Zhao, Z.; Chen, H.; Luo, Y.; Qin, G. Particle migration and blockage in geothermal reservoirs during water reinjection: Laboratory experiment and reaction kinetic model. Energy 2020, 206, 118234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tu, S.; Yang, X.; Zhou, X.; Luo, M.; Zhang, X. Experimenting and Modelling Thermal Performance of Ground Heat Exchanger under Freezing Soil Conditions. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Liu, J.; Yu, H.; Ji, H.; Zhao, K.; Lv, C.; Li, P. Optimal Operation Strategy of a Community Integrated Energy System Constrained by the Seasonal Balance of Ground Source Heat Pumps. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Shah, M.; Sircar, A.; Patel, K.; Shaikh, N.; Thakar, V.; Vaidya, D.; Chandra, S. Comprehensive study on Hybrid Geothermal Solar Cooling with special focus on Gujarat, western India. In Proceedings of the 43rd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 12–14 February 2018. SGP-TR-213. [Google Scholar]
  70. Tarnawski, V.R.; Leong, W.H.; Momose, T.; Hamada, Y. Analysis of Ground Source Heat Pumps with Horizontal Ground Heat Exchangers for northern Japan. Renew Energy 2009, 34, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Madani, H.; Claesson, J.; Lundqvist, P. A descriptive and comparative analysis of three common control techniques for an on/off controlled Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) system. Energy Build. 2013, 65, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bansal, V.; Misra, R.; Agrawal, G.D.; Mathur, J. Performance analysis of earth–pipe–air heat exchanger for summer cooling. Energy Build. 2010, 42, 645–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fayegh, S.K.; Rosen, M.A. Thermally Interacting Multiple Boreholes with Variable Heating Strength: Comparison between Analytical and Numerical Approaches. Sustainability 2012, 4, 1848–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Barbaresi, A.; Maioli, V.; Bovo, M.; Tinti, F.; Torreggiani, D.; Tassinari, P. Application of basket geothermal heat exchangers for sustainable greenhouse cultivation. Renew Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 129, 109928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kim, S.; Jang, Y.J.; Shin, Y.; Kim, G.H. Economic Feasibility Analysis of the Application of Geothermal Energy Facilities to Public Building Structures. Sustainability 2014, 6, 1667–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Vourdoubas, J. Creation of zero CO2 Emissions Hospitals Due to Energy Use a Case Study in Crete-Greece. Eng. Architec. 2015, 3, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ramos, E.P.; Breede, K.; Falcone, G. Geothermal heat recovery from abandoned mines: A systematic review of projects implemented worldwide and a methodology for screening new projects. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015, 73, 6783–6795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Verhoeven, R.; Willems, E.; Harcouët-Menou, V.; De Boever, E.; Hiddes, L.; Op’t Veld, P.; Demollin, E. Minewater 2.0 project in Heerlen the Netherlands: Transformation of a geothermal mine water pilot project into a full scale hybrid sustainable energy infrastructure for heating and cooling. Energy Procedia 2014, 46, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhua, K.; Fanga, L.; Diaoa, N.; Fang, Z. Potential underground environmental risk caused by the GSHP system. Procedia Eng. 2017, 205, 1477–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Deep, A.; Meena, C.S.; Das, A.K. Interaction of Asymmetric Films around Boiling Cylinder Array: Homogeneous Interface to Chaotic Phenomenon. J. Heat Trans. 2017, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Meena, C.S.; Deep, A.; Das, A.K. Understanding of interactions for bubbles generated at neighboring nucleation sites. Heat Transf. Eng. 2018, 39, 885–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ghosh, A. Potential of building integrated and attached/applied photovoltaic (BIPV/BAPV) for adaptive less energy-hungry building’s skin: A comprehensive Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 123343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ghosh, A.; Norton, B. Advances in switchable and highly insulating autonomous (self-powered) glazing systems for adaptive low energy buildings. Renew Energy 2018, 126, 1003–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. White, J.; Gillott, M.C.; Wood, C.J.; Loveday, D.L.; Vadodaria, K. Performance evaluation of a mechanically ventilated heat recovery (MVHR) system as part of a series of UK residential energy retrofit measures. Energy Build. 2016, 110, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wei, H.; Yang, D.; Wang, J.; Du, J. Field experiments on the cooling capability of earth-to-air heat exchangers in hot and humid climate. Appl. Energy 2020, 276, 115493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Caia, J.; Quana, Z.; Lia, T.; Houa, L.; Zhaoa, Y.; Yaoa, M. Performance study of a novel hybrid solar PV/T ground-source heat pump system. Procedia Eng. 2017, 205, 1642–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geothermal map of India [15].
Figure 1. Geothermal map of India [15].
Sustainability 12 08428 g001
Figure 2. Evolution of research publications during the last fifteen years related to numerical studies on ground source heat pump (GSHP), experimental studies on GSHP, and borehole exchangers worldwide.
Figure 2. Evolution of research publications during the last fifteen years related to numerical studies on ground source heat pump (GSHP), experimental studies on GSHP, and borehole exchangers worldwide.
Sustainability 12 08428 g002
Figure 3. Representation of various renewable energy technologies available in the market [16].
Figure 3. Representation of various renewable energy technologies available in the market [16].
Sustainability 12 08428 g003
Figure 4. Thermal energy storage: (a) Borehole thermal energy storage; (b) aquifer thermal energy storage.
Figure 4. Thermal energy storage: (a) Borehole thermal energy storage; (b) aquifer thermal energy storage.
Sustainability 12 08428 g004
Figure 5. Use of geothermal energy: (a) Ground source heat (GSH) pump; (b) ground source heat (GSH) pump with borehole heat exchanger (BHE); (c) energy piles; (d) ground water heat pump (GWHP).
Figure 5. Use of geothermal energy: (a) Ground source heat (GSH) pump; (b) ground source heat (GSH) pump with borehole heat exchanger (BHE); (c) energy piles; (d) ground water heat pump (GWHP).
Sustainability 12 08428 g005
Figure 6. Schematic diagram of the machine room of the ground source heat pump.
Figure 6. Schematic diagram of the machine room of the ground source heat pump.
Sustainability 12 08428 g006
Figure 7. Types of heat exchangers used in GSH pumps. (a) Vertical ground heat exchanger (GHE), (b) horizontal GHE, (c) spiral GHE.
Figure 7. Types of heat exchangers used in GSH pumps. (a) Vertical ground heat exchanger (GHE), (b) horizontal GHE, (c) spiral GHE.
Sustainability 12 08428 g007
Figure 8. Nearly zero energy buildings (nZEBs) with geothermal hybrid systems.
Figure 8. Nearly zero energy buildings (nZEBs) with geothermal hybrid systems.
Sustainability 12 08428 g008
Figure 9. Photovoltaic based GSH pump.
Figure 9. Photovoltaic based GSH pump.
Sustainability 12 08428 g009
Table 1. Studies carried out in different parts of the world and their key findings.
Table 1. Studies carried out in different parts of the world and their key findings.
InvestigatorsLocationKey Results
Seyboth et al. [16]GermanyInstalled capacity of geothermal found to be 25–30 GW. Moreover, the growing demand should be recognized in the field of renewable and new policies must be designed.
Gong and Werner [29]ChinaOne third of all the international scientific journals on district heating came from China during 2010–2013.
Soltani et al. [31]Iran and CanadaTotal geothermal installed around the world was 8771 MW in 2004. Moreover, CO2 production is reduced to 200 ton/yr from 28,000 ton/yr by replacing fossil fuels with geothermal energy.
Beerepoot and Marmion [32]FranceNew policies are required for renewable heat production as this is expected to increase in the future.
Demirbaş [33]TurkeyInstalled geothermal capacity is found to be 8200 MW. Moreover, 14% of the total world energy demand is supplied by renewable energy sources.
Lund et al. [34]USA and New ZealandCapacity of geothermal is found to be 28,268 MW and countries are using geothermal fluids for direct use, but their development is very slow as compared to other sources of energy.
Melikoglu [35]TurkeyTurkey’s target for 2023 was to achieve 600 MW geothermal installed capacities but they achieved it by 2015 only, then they modified it to 1000 MW by 2023 installed capacity.
Sivasakthivel et al. [36]India and UK collaboratedCOP of 3.92 (for heating and cooling) is observed.
Frick et al. [37]IndonesiaInstalled capacity of geothermal is 2 GW. Indonesia has a lot of potential when it comes to geothermal energy but no GSHP technology advances are taking place here.
Feng et al. [38]China, USA, and SingaporeResearch and case studies found that countries have developed nZEBs, but the policy framework needs to be implemented and focused for removing the barriers in the path of nZEBs.
Shahare and Harinarayana [39]IndiaUnderground water is maintained at a constant 26 °C at all ambient conditions in the Ahmedabad region using a shallow geothermal up to 3m of depth.
Table 2. Salient features of the geothermal energy and its impact on the environment.
Table 2. Salient features of the geothermal energy and its impact on the environment.
AuthorsLocationStudyEnergy ReductionCO₂ ReductionCOPPay Back (Years)
Neves et al. [43]Memphis, TennesseeTechno-Economic analysis26%---
Olabi et al. [44]FranceHybrid system----
Kljajić et al. [45]SerbiaShallow GSHP30%--4.9
Maoand Chen [46]ChinaExperiment on GSHP--1.56–2.01-
Lee et al. [47]KoreaGSHP vs. DH----
Liuand Hong [48]USVRF system vs. GSHP----
Zhao et al. [49]ChinaGSHP for roadheating--1.97–2.22-
Athresha et al. [50]UKOpen looped GSHP--2.7–3.9-
Franzen et al. [51]SwedenConventional vs.
Ectogrid
geothermal
61%
70%
12%
20%
--
Momin [52]PuneExperiments on GSHP40–60%-3.42–3.61-
Gao et al. [53]ChinaDXGSHP vs. GCHP26%40%6.03–6.254.4–5.6
Salem and Hashim [54]DubaiGCHP feasibility198 millionKWh- 8
Bu et al. [55]ChinaContinuous SWGH448.49 KW-3.87.17
Intermittent SWGH619.12 KW-4.55.16
Table 3. Studies carried out on borehole specifications in GSH pumps.
Table 3. Studies carried out on borehole specifications in GSH pumps.
AuthorsYear of StudyBorehole Specifications
TypeDepth (m)Spacing(m) b/w BoreholesNumber of Boreholes
Zhao et al. [49]2020Vertical loop single U Type100-10
Momin [52]2013Vertical closed loop U Type23–1505-
Bayer et al. [56]2014Vertical loop single U Type78654
Cocchi et al. [57]2013Vertical loop single U Type100 each 1014
Ma et al. [58]2019Vertical loop single U Type100 each 432
Zhai et al. [59]2017Vertical loop single U Type50, 60, 80-3 each
Table 4. Different software tools for modeling and simulation of various systems.
Table 4. Different software tools for modeling and simulation of various systems.
AuthorsSoftwareMethodologyOutcome
Yu et al. [25]TRACE 700Steady-state modelCalculation of cooling load
Farel and Basu [60]COMSOLCoupled heat transfer and Brinkman’s momentum equationTemperature and velocity fields
Shu et al. [62]FEFLOWConservation of mass, momentum, and energyImpact of boundary conditions on hydrodynamic temperature fields
Akbari et al. [63]EESMass conservation and law of thermodynamicsPerformance of Kalina and LiBr/H2O cycles
Ma et al. [58]TRNSYS-Heating and cooling load
Noorollahi et al. [64]EnergyPlusBuilding energy analysis and thermal loadHeating and cooling load
Stegnar et al. [65]PETAGIS MappingHeating and cooling demand, potential of RES
Zhang et al. [66]CMG STARS-Reaction kinetic parameters of particle migration and blockage in porous medium
Tu et al. [67]FLUENTCFD and RC modelSolve the freezing soil conditions
Liu et al. [68]YALMIPLinearizationSolve mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP)
Shah et al. [69]Mini-REFPROPBased R-134aCalculates properties of refrigerant R-134a
Tarnawski et al. [70]GHEADS-GHE sizing and GSHP performance
Madani et al. [71]TRNBUILD-Selects constructional material
Bansal et al. [72]FLUENTCFD ModelThermal performance of EAHE
Fayegh and Rosen [73]FLUENTControl volume methodSolve transient integral equation for energy conservation
Table 5. Comparison of geothermal GSH pump with other systems available in the market.
Table 5. Comparison of geothermal GSH pump with other systems available in the market.
SystemEase of DesignEase of InstallationInstallation SpaceMaintenance RequirementsMaintenance CostOperating CostsSound LevelsSystem Life
Two-Pipe Fan CoilsLowLowHighHighHighMed.LowMed.
Four-Pipe Fan CoilsLowLowHighHighHighHighLowMed.
PTAC/PTHPLowLowLowHighHighHighHighLow
VAVLowLowHighHighHighMed.Med.Med.
Geothermal GSHPHighHighLowLowLowLowLowHigh

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aggarwal, V.; Meena, C.S.; Kumar, A.; Alam, T.; Kumar, A.; Ghosh, A.; Ghosh, A. Potential and Future Prospects of Geothermal Energy in Space Conditioning of Buildings: India and Worldwide Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8428. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208428

AMA Style

Aggarwal V, Meena CS, Kumar A, Alam T, Kumar A, Ghosh A, Ghosh A. Potential and Future Prospects of Geothermal Energy in Space Conditioning of Buildings: India and Worldwide Review. Sustainability. 2020; 12(20):8428. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208428

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aggarwal, Vivek, Chandan Swaroop Meena, Ashok Kumar, Tabish Alam, Anuj Kumar, Arijit Ghosh, and Aritra Ghosh. 2020. "Potential and Future Prospects of Geothermal Energy in Space Conditioning of Buildings: India and Worldwide Review" Sustainability 12, no. 20: 8428. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208428

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop