Cryogenic Foaming of Silk Fibroin Composite for Scaffolds in Bone and Periodontal Regeneration
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. SF Preparation
2.2. Fabrication of SF-Based Cryogenic Composite Foams
2.3. FTIR-ATR Analysis
2.4. Morphological Characterization
2.5. X-Ray Microcomputed Tomography (µ-CT)
2.6. Swelling/Weight Stability Experiments
2.7. Weight Stability Test
2.8. Uniaxial Compression Tests of Scaffolds
2.9. In Vitro Biological Testing
2.9.1. Sample Preparation, Sterilization, and Equilibration
2.9.2. Cell Culture and Indirect Cytotoxicity Assay
2.9.3. Osteoblasts Seeding on Scaffolds for Adhesion and Proliferation Assays
2.9.4. MTT Assay
2.9.5. Stereoscope and Confocal Microscope Images
2.10. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Silk Fibroin Cryogenic Composite Foams
3.2. Morphological Macroscopic Characterization and Interaction with Fluids and Dynamic Swelling
3.3. Assessment of Trabecular-Like Architecture Through µ-CT
3.4. Rheological Analysis Through Uniaxial Compression Tests of Scaffolds
3.5. 3D Culture and Cell Morphology on Scaffolds
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| SF | silk fibroin |
| β-TCP | β-tricalcium phosphate |
| PCL | poly-ε-caprolactone |
| CNT | control samples composed solely of pure SF |
| BTE | bone tissue engineering |
| ECM | extracellular matrix |
| HA | hydroxyapatite |
| ATR-FTIR | Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared |
| SEM | scanning electron microscopy |
| eSEM | environmental scanning electron microscopy |
| µ-CT | X-ray microcomputed tomography |
| Sr | swelling ratio |
| Rw | total retained water |
| LiBr | lithium bromide |
| PLA | polylactic acid |
| FBS | fetal bovine serum |
| MTT | tetrazolium salts test |
| DMSO | dimethyl-sulfoxide |
| PBS | phosphate-buffered saline |
| SEM | standard error of the mean |
| ANOVA | analysis of variance |
References
- Lee, J.; Byun, H.; Perikamana, S.K.M.; Lee, S.; Shin, H. Current Advances in Immunomodulatory Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 8, e1801106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farokhi, M.; Mottaghitalab, F.; Samani, S.; Shokrgozar, M.A.; Kundu, S.C.; Reis, R.L.; Fatahi, Y.; Kaplan, D.L. Silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 68–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciszyński, M.; Dominiak, S.; Dominiak, M.; Gedrange, T.; Hadzik, J. Allogenic Bone Graft in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majidinia, M.; Sadeghpour, A.; Yousefi, B. The roles of signaling pathways in bone repair and regeneration. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 233, 2937–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, Y.F.; Wang, H.; Zhu, Y.; Peng, Y.; Bai, F.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, K.-Q. Hydroxyapatite/Silk Fibroin Composite Scaffold with a Porous Structure and Mechanical Strength Similar to Cancellous Bone by Electric Field-Induced Gel Technology. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 60977–60991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, D.H.; Tripathy, N.; Shin, J.H.; Song, J.E.; Cha, J.G.; Min, K.D.; Park, C.H.; Khang, G. Enhanced osteogenesis of β-tricalcium phosphate reinforced silk fibroin scaffold for bone tissue biofabrication. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 95, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Park, J.-Y.; Yang, C.; Jung, I.-H.; Lim, H.-C.; Lee, J.-S.; Jung, U.-W.; Seo, Y.-K.; Park, J.-K.; Choi, S.-H. Regeneration of rabbit calvarial defects using cells-implanted nano-hydroxyapatite coated silk scaffolds. Biomater. Res. 2015, 19, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, T.; Lian, X.; Ullah, A.; Liu, Z.; Fu, T.; Hao, R.; Zhao, L.; Huang, D. The multi-scale porous and hydrophilic 3D printed polycaprolactone/ silk fibroin/ β-tricalcium phosphate bone scaffolds effect on femoral defect repair. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 330, 148230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Giorgio, G.; Matera, B.; Vurro, D.; Manfredi, E.; Galstyan, V.; Tarabella, G.; Ghezzi, B.; D’angelo, P. Silk Fibroin Materials: Biomedical Applications and Perspectives. Bioengineering 2024, 11, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bansal, S.; Chauhan, V.; Sharma, S.; Maheshwari, R.; Juyal, A.; Raghuvanshi, S. Evaluation of hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate mixed with bone marrow aspirate as a bone graft substitute for posterolateral spinal fusion. Indian J. Orthop. 2009, 43, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogose, A.; Hotta, T.; Kawashima, H.; Kondo, N.; Gu, W.; Kamura, T.; Endo, N. Comparison of hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium phosphate as bone substitutes after excision of bone tumors. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2005, 72, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Basak, S.; Packirisamy, G. Biofabrication of Gas-Foamed, Macroporous Nanofiber–Hydrogel Composites with Tunable Mechanics and mTCP Bioactivation for Advanced Bone Tissue Regeneration. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2025, 11, 7429–7444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diaz-Gomez, L.; García-González, C.A.; Wang, J.; Yang, F.; Aznar-Cervantes, S.; Cenis, J.L.; Reyes, R.; Delgado, A.; Évora, C.; Concheiro, A.; et al. Biodegradable PCL/fibroin/hydroxyapatite porous scaffolds prepared by supercritical foaming for bone regeneration. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 527, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Xu, G.W.; Wang, Y.F.; Zhao, H.S.; Xiong, S.; Wu, Y.; Heng, B.C.; An, C.R.; Zhu, G.H.; Xie, D.H. Composite scaffolds of nano-hydroxyapatite and silk fibroin enhance mesenchymal stem cell-based bone regeneration via the interleukin 1 alpha autocrine/paracrine signaling loop. Biomaterials 2015, 49, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ko, E.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, H.; Yang, S.Y.; Yang, D.; Yang, K.; Lee, J.; Shin, J.; Yang, H.S.; Ryu, W.; et al. Electrospun Silk Fibroin Nanofibrous Scaffolds with Two-Stage Hydroxyapatite Functionalization for Enhancing the Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 10, 7614–7625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Don, T.M.; Lee, K.T.; Chen, B.Y.; Tang, S.; Huang, Y.C.; Chuang, A.E.-Y. Physicochemical properties of bacterial cellulose/phototherapeutic polypyrrole/antibacterial chitosan composite membranes and their evaluation as chronic wound dressings. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 308, 142183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiao, M.; Yao, J.; Shao, Z.; Chen, X. Silk-Based 3D Porous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2024, 10, 2827–2840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matera, B.; De Giorgio, G.; Rupel, K.; Turco, G.; D’Angelo, P.; Ghezzi, B. Silk-fibroin scaffolds enriched with calcium-based fillers for bone regeneration: A systematic review. Ceram. Int. 2026, 52, 12313–12342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayattork, M.; Rajkhowa, R.; Allardyce, B.J.; Wang, X.; Li, J. Tuning the microstructure and mechanical properties of lyophilized silk scaffolds by pre-freezing treatment of silk hydrogel and silk solution. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 631, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yetiskin, B.; Okay, O. High-strength silk fibroin scaffolds with anisotropic mechanical properties. Polymer 2017, 112, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Giorgio, G.; Vit, V.; Vurro, D.; Guagnini, B.; Zumbo, B.; Coppedè, N.; Turco, G.; Tarabella, G.; D’aNgelo, P. Breakthrough Assembly of a Silk Fibroin Composite for Application in Resistive Pressure Sensing. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2025, 7, 5013–5024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mancini, L.; Dreossi, D.; Fava, C.; Sodini, N.; Tromba, G.; Faretto, S.; Montanari, F. TOMOLAB: The new X-ray mi-cro-tomography facility at Elettra. Elettra Highlights 2007, 6, 128–129. [Google Scholar]
- Doube, M.; Kłosowski, M.M.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Cordelières, F.P.; Dougherty, R.P.; Jackson, J.S.; Schmid, B.; Hutchinson, J.R.; Shefelbine, S.J. BoneJ: Free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ. Bone 2010, 47, 1076–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otsu, N. A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. 1979, 9, 62–66. [Google Scholar]
- Parfitt, A.M.; Mathews, C.H.; Villanueva, A.R.; Kleerekoper, M.; Frame, B.; Rao, D.S. Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. J. Clin. Investig. 1983, 72, 1396–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turco, G.; Marsich, E.; Bellomo, F.; Semeraro, S.; Donati, I.; Brun, F.; Grandolfo, M.; Accardo, A.; Paoletti, S. Alginate/hydroxyapatite biocomposite for bone ingrowth: A trabecular structure with high and isotropic connectivity. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10, 1575–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, S.-H.; Jun, Y.-K.; Hong, S.-H.; Kim, H.-E. Synthesis and Dissolution Behavior of b-TCP and HA/b-TCP Composite Powders. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2003, 7, 1039–1045. [Google Scholar]
- Elzein, T.; Nasser-Eddine, M.; Delaite, C.; Bistac, S.; Dumas, P. FTIR study of polycaprolactone chain organization at interfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 273, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Tian, W.; Zhang, Y.; Song, H.; Yu, Y.; Chen, X.; Yong, N.; Li, X.; Yin, Y.; Fan, Q.; et al. Mechanical Properties and Mineralization Activity. Polymers 2022, 14, 2466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lowe, B.; Ottensmeyer, M.P.; Xu, C.; He, Y.; Ye, Q.; Troulis, M.J. The regenerative applicability of bioactive glass and beta-tricalcium phosphate in bone tissue engineering: A transformation perspective. J. Funct. Biomater. 2019, 10, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yucel, T.; Cebe, P.; Kaplan, D.L. Vortex-induced injectable silk fibroin hydrogels. Biophys. J. 2009, 97, 2044–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, N.; Moore, M.J.; Michael, P.L.; Santos, M.; Lam, Y.T.; Bao, S.; Ng, M.K.C.; Rnjak-Kovacina, J.; Tan, R.P.; Wise, S.G. Silk Fibroin Scaffold Architecture Regulates Inflammatory Responses and Engraftment of Bone Marrow-Mononuclear Cells. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, 2100615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Z.; Li, J.; Fu, L.; Xia, T.; Dong, X.; Deng, H.; Zhang, C.; Xia, H. Janus silk fibroin/polycaprolactone-based scaffold with directionally aligned fibers and porous structure for bone regeneration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 262, 129927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, R.; Meng, L.; Fu, Q.; Hao, S.; Yang, J. Fabrication of Anisotropic Silk Fibroin-Cellulose Nanocrystals Cryogels with Tunable Mechanical Properties, Rapid Swelling, and Structural Recoverability via a Directional-Freezing Strategy. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 12274–12285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- She, Z.; Liu, W.; Feng, Q. Self-assembly model, hepatocytes attachment and inflammatory response for silk fibroin/chitosan scaffolds. Biomed. Mater. 2009, 4, 045014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dwivedi, R.; Kumar, S.; Pandey, R.; Mahajan, A.; Nandana, D.; Katti, D.S.; Mehrotra, D. Polycaprolactone as biomaterial for bone scaffolds: Review of literature. J. Oral Biol. Craniofacial Res. 2020, 10, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mohammadi, H.; Sepantafar, M.; Muhamad, N.; Sulong, A.B. How Does Scaffold Porosity Conduct Bone Tissue Regeneration? Adv. Eng. Mater. 2021, 23, 2100463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toosi, S.; Javid-Naderi, M.J.; Tamayol, A.; Ebrahimzadeh, M.H.; Yaghoubian, S.; Shaegh, S.A.M. Additively manufactured porous scaffolds by design for treatment of bone defects. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2024, 11, 1252636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mukasheva, F.; Adilova, L.; Dyussenbinov, A.; Yernaimanova, B.; Abilev, M.; Akilbekova, D. Optimizing scaffold pore size for tissue engineering: Insights across various tissue types. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2024, 12, 1444986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, R.; Wang, R.; Abbaspoor, S.; Rajan, M.; Jalil, A.T.; Saleh, M.M.; Wang, W. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of hydrogel-based scaffold for bone tissue engineering application. Arab. J. Chem. 2023, 16, 104799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thi, T.T.H.; Lee, Y.; Le Thi, P.; Park, K.D. Engineered horseradish peroxidase-catalyzed hydrogels with high tissue adhesiveness for biomedical applications. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 78, 34–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta, S.D.; Hexiu, J.; Patel, D.K.; Ganguly, K.; Lim, K.-T. 3D-printed bioactive and biodegradable hydrogel scaffolds of alginate/gelatin/cellulose nanocrystals for tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 167, 644–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lekhavadhani, S.; Shanmugavadivu, A.; Selvamurugan, N. Role and Architectural Significance of Porous Chitosan-Based Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 251, 126238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arul, K.T.; Manikandan, E.; Ladchumananandasivam, R. Chapter 17—Polymer-Based Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications. In Nanoarchitectonics in Biomedicine; Grumezescu, A.M., Ed.; William Andrew Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 585–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhan, Y.; Fu, W.; Xing, Y.; Ma, X.; Chen, C. Advances in versatile anti-swelling polymer hydrogels. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 127, 112208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, L.; Chen, S.; Guo, X.; Deng, J.; Zheng, P.; Wang, R. Mechanically robust polyvinyl alcohol/silk fibroin cryogels via freeze–thaw processing for cartilage defect repair. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 323, 147122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, Z.; Tan, W.; Lang, M. Effect of porosity on long-term degradation of poly (ε-caprolactone) scaffolds and their cellular response. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2013, 98, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Tienen, T.G.; Heijkants, R.G.; Buma, P.; de Groot, J.H.; Pennings, A.J.; Veth, R.P. Tissue ingrowth and degradation of two biodegradable porous polymers with different porosities and pore sizes. Biomaterials 2002, 23, 1731–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mendonça, R.H.; Meiga, T.d.O.; da Costa, M.F.; Thiré, R.M.d.S.M. Production of 3D scaffolds applied to tissue engineering using chitosan swelling as a porogenic agent. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 129, 614–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaliampakou, C.; Lagopati, N.; Pavlatou, E.A.; Charitidis, C.A. Alginate–Gelatin Hydrogel Scaffolds; An Optimization of Post-Printing Treatment for Enhanced Degradation and Swelling Behavior. Gels 2023, 9, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodriguez-Palomo, A.; Østergaard, M.; Birkedal, H. Bone Hierarchical Structure: Heterogeneity and Uniformity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 34, 2307026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zadpoor, A.A. Bone Tissue Regeneration: The Role of Scaffold Geometry. Biomater. Sci. 2014, 3, 231–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guagnini, B.; Medagli, B.; Zumbo, B.; Cannillo, V.; Turco, G.; Porrelli, D.; Bellucci, D. Alginate-Sr/Mg Containing Bioactive Glass Scaffolds: The Characterization of a New 3D Composite for Bone Tissue Engineering. J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porrelli, D.; Gruppuso, M.; Vecchies, F.; Marsich, E.; Turco, G. Alginate bone scaffolds coated with a bioactive lactose modified chitosan for human dental pulp stem cells proliferation and differentiation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 273, 118610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stafin, K.; Śliwa, P.; Piątkowski, M. Towards Polycaprolactone-Based Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone Tissue Engineering: A Biomimetic Approach in a 3D Printing Technique. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Coyle, D.; Zumbo, B.; Moritz, N.; Frantzén, J.; Aitasalo, K.; Turco, G.; Kulkova, J. Impact-resistance of bio-inspired functionalized polyether-ether-ketone implant for cranioplasty. J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg. 2025, 53, 1647–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghezzi, B.; Lagonegro, P.; Fukata, N.; Parisi, L.; Calestani, D.; Galli, C.; Salviati, G.; Macaluso, G.M.; Rossi, F. Sub-Micropillar Spacing Modulates the Spatial Arrangement of Mouse MC3T3-E1 Osteoblastic Cells. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghezzi, B.; Matera, B.; Meglioli, M.; Rossi, F.; Duraccio, D.; Faga, M.G.; Zappettini, A.; Macaluso, G.M.; Lumetti, S. Composite PCL Scaffold With 70% β-TCP as Suitable Structure for Bone Replacement. Int. Dent. J. 2024, 74, 1220–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruyas, A.; Lou, F.; Stahl, A.M.; Gardner, M.; Maloney, W.; Goodman, S.; Yang, Y.P. Systematic characterization of 3D-printed PCL/β-TCP scaffolds for biomedical devices and bone tissue engineering: Influence of composition and porosity. J. Mater. Res. 2018, 33, 1948–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marrella, A.; Lee, T.Y.; Lee, D.H.; Karuthedom, S.; Syla, D.; Chawla, A.; Khademhosseini, A.; Jang, H.L. Engineering vascularized and innervated bone biomaterials for improved skeletal tissue regeneration. Mater. Today 2017, 21, 362–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, S.; Chen, B.; Gao, M.; Xu, Y.; Yang, X.; Yang, C.; Pan, S. Substrate Stiffness of Bone Microenvironment Controls Functions of Pre-Osteoblasts and Fibroblasts In Vitro. Biomimetics 2023, 8, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, M.; Chi, G.; Li, P.; Lv, S.; Xu, J.; Xu, Z.; Xia, Y.; Tan, Y.; Xu, J.; Li, L.; et al. Effects of matrix stiffness on the morphology, adhesion, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2018, 15, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, T.; Lin, S.; Shao, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xue, C.; Zhang, S.; Lin, Y.; Zhu, B.; Cai, X. Effect of matrix stiffness on osteoblast functionalization. Cell Prolif. 2017, 50, e12338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yi, B.; Xu, Q.; Liu, W. An overview of substrate stiffness guided cellular response and its applications in tissue regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 2021, 15, 82–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]









| % Swelling Ratio (Sr) | % Total Retained Water (RW) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNT | 260.2 | ±21.7 | CNT | 18.8 | ±6.7 |
| SF/β-TCP | 113.7 | ±4.7 | SF/β-TCP | 36.0 | ±5.6 |
| SF/β-TCP/PCL | 18.0 | ±0.4 | SF/β-TCP/PCL | 48.1 | ±2 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
De Giorgio, G.; Medagli, B.; Matera, B.; Rupel, K.; Tarabella, G.; Turco, G.; Manfredi, M.; Ghezzi, B.; D’Angelo, P. Cryogenic Foaming of Silk Fibroin Composite for Scaffolds in Bone and Periodontal Regeneration. J. Funct. Biomater. 2026, 17, 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb17050230
De Giorgio G, Medagli B, Matera B, Rupel K, Tarabella G, Turco G, Manfredi M, Ghezzi B, D’Angelo P. Cryogenic Foaming of Silk Fibroin Composite for Scaffolds in Bone and Periodontal Regeneration. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2026; 17(5):230. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb17050230
Chicago/Turabian StyleDe Giorgio, Giuseppe, Barbara Medagli, Biagio Matera, Katia Rupel, Giuseppe Tarabella, Gianluca Turco, Maddalena Manfredi, Benedetta Ghezzi, and Pasquale D’Angelo. 2026. "Cryogenic Foaming of Silk Fibroin Composite for Scaffolds in Bone and Periodontal Regeneration" Journal of Functional Biomaterials 17, no. 5: 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb17050230
APA StyleDe Giorgio, G., Medagli, B., Matera, B., Rupel, K., Tarabella, G., Turco, G., Manfredi, M., Ghezzi, B., & D’Angelo, P. (2026). Cryogenic Foaming of Silk Fibroin Composite for Scaffolds in Bone and Periodontal Regeneration. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 17(5), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb17050230

