Membrane-Focused Strategies Against Acinetobacter baumannii: The Therapeutic Potential of Functional Copolymers
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. The Pathogen: A. baumannii’s Arsenal—Membrane and Beyond
2.1. Determinants of Colonization and Pathogenicity
2.2. A. baumannii Cell Wall

2.3. Capsule Formation and Its Protective Role
2.4. Biofilm Formation and Resistance
3. Treatments of A. baumannii Infections
3.1. Diagnostic Methods for Detecting Antibiotic Resistance: From Classical to Emerging Technologies
3.2. The Challenge: Failure of Conventional Therapies
3.3. Alternatives to Antibiotics
3.3.1. Bacteriophage/Phytoextracts and Essential Oils/Probiotics/Immunotherapies/Drug Repurposing
3.3.2. Antimicrobial Peptides
4. Membrane-Targeting Copolymers: A Novel Arsenal Against A. baumannii
4.1. Definition and Characteristics

4.2. Non-Degradable Copolymers
4.2.1. Vinyl-Based Copolymers (Poly(meth)acrylates)
- Quaternary Ammonium: Common copolymers such as poly(butyl methacrylate)-block-poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (PBMA-b-PDMAEMA), primarily exert their antibacterial activity through membrane disruption and lysis. While these copolymers can be highly effective, their non-specific membrane activity is often associated with significant cytotoxicity, limiting their therapeutic potential [172].
- Guanidinium: In contrast, the incorporation of guanidinium groups markedly improves bacterial selectivity. Unlike ammonium, guanidinium groups can form bidentate hydrogen bonds with phosphate groups present on bacterial membranes. This interaction enhances antibacterial activity with reported minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 7.8 to 15.6 µg/mL against Gram-negative bacteria, including A. baumannii with limited to no hemolytic effect (HC50 ≥ 2000 µg/mL) and high selectivity indexes (> to 266) [161].
4.2.2. Current Applications
4.3. The Shift Toward Degradable Copolymers
4.3.1. Biodegradable Micelles
4.3.2. Radical Ring-Opening Polymerization (rROP)
4.4. Current Polymers with Efficacy on A. baumannii
4.4.1. Guanidinium-Functionalized Polycarbonates
4.4.2. Self-Assembling Micelles and Nanogels
4.4.3. Peptidomimetics and Sequence Control
4.4.4. Advanced Hydrogels and Novel Polymeric Therapeutics
4.5. Bypassing A. baumannii Resistance Mechanisms via Engineered Copolymers
4.6. Limitations of Antimicrobial Copolymers and Emerging Solutions
- -
- -
- -
- Natural or bio-derived monomers, like tropolone-based hydrophobic monomers, offer another approach to enhance biocompatibility without compromising efficacy [204].
- -
- -
- -
- Cross-linked networks and bottlebrush architectures help sustain antimicrobial activity under physiological conditions and extend coating lifespan [206,209]. Some copolymers, especially those that disrupt membranes non-specifically, show a low likelihood of resistance development, even after repeated exposure [210], making them promising candidates when conventional antibiotics fail.
- -
- Based on the demonstrated synergistic effect of polymers and antibiotics, it will be interesting to design and synthetize chimeric hybrid molecules containing antibiotics covalently linked to the antimicrobial polymers
- -
- Importantly, although in vivo studies have proved that polymers are efficient against bacterial infection, including by A. baumannii, pharmacokinetic (PK/PD) studies and ultimately clinical trials will be crucial before being able to use these molecules in veterinary or human medicine.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AMR | Antimicrobial resistance |
| ATRP | Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization |
| CarO | Carbapenem-associated outer membrane protein |
| CKAs | Cyclic ketene acetals |
| CRAB | Carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii |
| DOT | Dibenzo [c,e]oxepane-5-thione |
| eDNA | extracellular DNA |
| Eos | Essential oils |
| LOS | Lipooligosaccharides |
| LPS | Lipopolysaccharide |
| MALDI-TOF MS | Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry |
| MDO | 2-methylene-1,3-dioxepane |
| MDR | Multidrug-resistant |
| MIC | Minimum inhibitory concentrations |
| MRSA | Methicillin-resistant S. aureus |
| MWD | Molecular Weight Distribution |
| OM | Outer membrane |
| OMPs | Outer membrane protein |
| OmpA | Outer membrane protein A |
| PNAG | Poly-β-(1,6)-N-acetylglucosamine |
| RAFT | Reversible Addition-Fragmentation chain Transfer |
| rROP | Radical ring-opening polymerization |
| VClAc | Vinyl chloroacetate |
References
- United Nations Environment Programme. Environmental Dimensions of Antimicrobial Resistance: Summary for Policymakers; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2022; Available online: https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/38373 (accessed on 8 April 2026).
- Laxminarayan, R.; Duse, A.; Wattal, C.; Zaidi, A.K.M.; Wertheim, H.F.L.; Sumpradit, N.; Vlieghe, E.; Hara, G.L.; Gould, I.M.; Goossens, H.; et al. Antibiotic Resistance—The Need for Global Solutions. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 1057–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Naghavi, M.; Vollset, S.E.; Ikuta, K.S.; Swetschinski, L.R.; Gray, A.P.; Wool, E.E.; Robles Aguilar, G.; Mestrovic, T.; Smith, G.; Han, C.; et al. Global Burden of Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance 1990–2021: A Systematic Analysis with Forecasts to 2050. Lancet 2024, 404, 1199–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024: Bacterial Pathogens of Public Health Importance to Guide Research, Development and Strategies to Prevent and Control Antimicrobial Resistance. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240093461 (accessed on 25 November 2024).
- Kyriakidis, I.; Vasileiou, E.; Pana, Z.D.; Tragiannidis, A. Acinetobacter baumannii Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms. Pathogens 2021, 10, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cai, Y.; Chai, D.; Wang, R.; Liang, B.; Bai, N. Colistin Resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii: Clinical Reports, Mechanisms and Antimicrobial Strategies. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 1607–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gordon, N.C.; Wareham, D.W. Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Mechanisms of Virulence and Resistance. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2010, 35, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mulvey, M.R.; Simor, A.E. Antimicrobial Resistance in Hospitals: How Concerned Should We Be? Can. Med Assoc. J. 2009, 180, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Årdal, C.; Balasegaram, M.; Laxminarayan, R.; McAdams, D.; Outterson, K.; Rex, J.H.; Sumpradit, N. Antibiotic Development—Economic, Regulatory and Societal Challenges. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- World Health Organization. Analysis of Antibacterial Agents in Clinicaland Preclinical Development: Overview and Analysis 2025. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240113091 (accessed on 25 November 2024).
- Antibacterial Products in Clinical Development for Priority Pathogens. Available online: https://www.who.int/observatories/global-observatory-on-health-research-and-development/monitoring/antibacterial-products-in-clinical-development-for-priority-pathogens (accessed on 1 February 2026).
- Di Bonaventura, G.; Lupetti, V.; Verginelli, F.; Giancristofaro, S.; Barbieri, R.; Gherardi, G.; Pompilio, A. Repurposing the Veterinary Antibiotic Apramycin for Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa From Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 801152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Frimodt-Møller, N.; Hansen, J.U.; Plattner, M.; Huseby, D.L.; Radmer Almind, S.; Haldimann, K.; Gysin, M.; Petersson, A.; Ercan, O.; Ganz, L.; et al. Apramycin Efficacy against Carbapenem- and Aminoglycoside-Resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Murine Bloodstream Infection Models. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2024, 64, 107181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sun, Q.; Yan, J.; Long, S.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, G.; Li, H.; Huang, H.; Wang, G. Apramycin Has High in Vitro Activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Med. Microbiol. 2024, 73, 001854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Aranzana-Climent, V.; Hughes, D.; Cao, S.; Tomczak, M.; Urbas, M.; Zabicka, D.; Vingsbo Lundberg, C.; Hansen, J.; Lindberg, J.; Hobbie, S.N.; et al. Translational in Vitro and in Vivo PKPD Modelling for Apramycin against Gram-Negative Lung Pathogens to Facilitate Prediction of Human Efficacious Dose in Pneumonia. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2022, 28, 1367–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Juhas, M.; Widlake, E.; Teo, J.; Huseby, D.L.; Tyrrell, J.M.; Polikanov, Y.S.; Ercan, O.; Petersson, A.; Cao, S.; Aboklaish, A.F.; et al. In Vitro Activity of Apramycin against Multidrug-, Carbapenem- and Aminoglycoside-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 944–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Riedel, S.; Vijayakumar, D.; Berg, G.; Kang, A.D.; Smith, K.P.; Kirby, J.E. Evaluation of Apramycin against Spectinomycin-Resistant and -Susceptible Strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 1311–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hao, M.; Shi, X.; Lv, J.; Niu, S.; Cheng, S.; Du, H.; Yu, F.; Tang, Y.-W.; Kreiswirth, B.N.; Zhang, H.; et al. In Vitro Activity of Apramycin Against Carbapenem-Resistant and Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kang, A.D.; Smith, K.P.; Eliopoulos, G.M.; Berg, A.H.; McCoy, C.; Kirby, J.E. In Vitro Apramycin Activity against Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 88, 188–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhao, C.; Chirkova, A.; Rosenborg, S.; Palma Villar, R.; Lindberg, J.; Hobbie, S.N.; Friberg, L.E. Population Pharmacokinetics of Apramycin from First-in-Human Plasma and Urine Data to Support Prediction of Efficacious Dose. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2022, 77, 2718–2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wray, C.; Hedges, R.W.; Shannon, K.P.; Bradley, D.E. Apramycin and Gentamicin Resistance in Escherichia coli and Salmonellas Isolated from Farm Animals. Epidemiol. Infect. 1986, 97, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gysin, M.; Hon, P.Y.; Tan, P.; Sengduangphachanh, A.; Simmalavong, M.; Hinfonthong, P.; Kaewphanderm, N.; Pham, T.D.; Nguyen, T.H.; Haldimann, K.; et al. Apramycin Susceptibility of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Blood Culture Isolates in Five Countries in Southeast Asia. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2022, 60, 106659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hameed, P.S.; Kotakonda, H.; Sharma, S.; Nandishaiah, R.; Katagihallimath, N.; Rao, R.; Sadler, C.; Slater, I.; Morton, M.; Chandrasekaran, A.; et al. BWC0977, a Broad-Spectrum Antibacterial Clinical Candidate to Treat Multidrug Resistant Infections. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 8202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mushtaq, S.; Garello, P.; Vickers, A.; Woodford, N.; Livermore, D.M. Activity of Cefepime/Zidebactam (WCK 5222) against ‘Problem’ Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Sent to a National Reference Laboratory. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 76, 1511–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Livermore, D.M.; Mushtaq, S.; Warner, M.; Vickers, A.; Woodford, N. In Vitro Activity of Cefepime/Zidebactam (WCK 5222) against Gram-Negative Bacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 1373–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sader, H.S.; Mendes, R.E.; Duncan, L.R.; Carvalhaes, C.G.; Castanheria, M. Antimicrobial Activity of Cefepime/Zidebactam (WCK 5222), a β-Lactam/β-Lactam Enhancer Combination, against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacteria Collected Worldwide (2018–19). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2022, 77, 2642–2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Karlowsky, J.A.; Hackel, M.A.; Bouchillon, S.K.; Sahm, D.F. In Vitro Activity of WCK 5222 (Cefepime-Zidebactam) against Worldwide Collected Gram-Negative Bacilli Not Susceptible to Carbapenems. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e01432-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Avery, L.M.; Abdelraouf, K.; Nicolau, D.P. Assessment of the In Vivo Efficacy of WCK 5222 (Cefepime-Zidebactam) against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in the Neutropenic Murine Lung Infection Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00948-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Almarzoky Abuhussain, S.S.; Avery, L.M.; Abdelraouf, K.; Nicolau, D.P. In Vivo Efficacy of Humanized WCK 5222 (Cefepime-Zidebactam) Exposures against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in the Neutropenic Thigh Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 63, e01931-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dubey, D.; Roy, M.; Shah, T.H.; Bano, N.; Kulshrestha, V.; Mitra, S.; Sangwan, P.; Dubey, M.; Imran, A.; Jain, B.; et al. Compassionate Use of a Novel β-Lactam Enhancer-Based Investigational Antibiotic Cefepime/Zidebactam (WCK 5222) for the Treatment of Extensively-Drug-Resistant NDM-Expressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in an Intra-Abdominal Infection-Induced Sepsis Patient: A Case Report. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2023, 22, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kidd, J.M.; Abdelraouf, K.; Nicolau, D.P. Efficacy of Human-Simulated Bronchopulmonary Exposures of Cefepime, Zidebactam and the Combination (WCK 5222) against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Neutropenic Murine Pneumonia Model. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Egge, S.L.; Lewis, J.S.; Hakki, M. Case Commentary: Successful Use of Cefepime/Zidebactam (WCK 5222) as a Salvage Therapy for the Treatment of Disseminated Extensively Drug-Resistant New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in an Adult Patient with Acute T-Cell Leukemia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2023, 67, e00663-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rodvold, K.A.; Gotfried, M.H.; Chugh, R.; Gupta, M.; Patel, A.; Chavan, R.; Yeole, R.; Friedland, H.D.; Bhatia, A. Plasma and Intrapulmonary Concentrations of Cefepime and Zidebactam Following Intravenous Administration of WCK 5222 to Healthy Adult Subjects. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00682-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mushtaq, S.; Vickers, A.; Chaudhry, A.; Woodford, N.; Livermore, D.M. Inoculum Effects of Cefepime/Zidebactam (WCK 5222) and Ertapenem/Zidebactam (WCK 6777) for Enterobacterales in Relation to β-Lactamase Type and Enhancer Effect, as Tested by BSAC Agar Dilution. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2022, 77, 1916–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.; Yan, M.; Xue, F.; Zhong, W.; Liu, X.; Chen, X.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Q.; Zheng, B.; et al. In Vitro and in Vivo Activities of a Novel β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination Imipenem/XNW4107 against Recent Clinical Gram-Negative Bacilli from China. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2022, 31, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fratoni, A.J.; Berry, A.V.; Liu, X.; Chen, X.; Wu, Y.; Nicolau, D.P.; Abdelraouf, K. Imipenem/Funobactam (Formerly XNW4107) in Vivo Pharmacodynamics against Serine Carbapenemase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Novel Modelling Approach for Time-Dependent Killing. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2023, 78, 2343–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Takemoto, K.; Nakayama, R.; Fujimoto, K.; Suzuki, Y.; Takarabe, Y.; Honsho, M.; Kitahara, S.; Noguchi, Y.; Matsui, H.; Hirose, T.; et al. In Vitro and in Vivo Activities of KSP-1007, a Broad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine- and Metallo-β-Lactamases, in Combination with Meropenem against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2024, 68, e01602-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Davies, D.T.; Leiris, S.; Zalacain, M.; Sprynski, N.; Castandet, J.; Bousquet, J.; Lozano, C.; Llanos, A.; Alibaud, L.; Vasa, S.; et al. Discovery of ANT3310, a Novel Broad-Spectrum Serine β-Lactamase Inhibitor of the Diazabicyclooctane Class, Which Strongly Potentiates Meropenem Activity against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales and Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 15802–15820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zalacain, M.; Achard, P.; Llanos, A.; Morrissey, I.; Hawser, S.; Holden, K.; Toomey, E.; Davies, D.; Leiris, S.; Sable, C.; et al. Meropenem-ANT3310, a Unique β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination with Expanded Antibacterial Spectrum against Gram-Negative Pathogens Including Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2024, 68, e01120-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Pharmaceuticals, M. MicuRx: Successful Completion of Phase I Clinical Trial for Self-Developed MRX-8 Antibacterial Drug in China. Available online: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/micurx-successful-completion-of-phase-i-clinical-trial-for-self-developed-mrx-8-antibacterial-drug-in-china-302166098.html (accessed on 1 February 2026).
- Duncan, L.R.; Wang, W.; Sader, H.S. In Vitro Potency and Spectrum of the Novel Polymyxin MRX-8 Tested against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2022, 66, e00139-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lepak, A.J.; Wang, W.; Andes, D.R. Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of MRX-8, a Novel Polymyxin, in the Neutropenic Mouse Thigh and Lung Infection Models against Gram-Negative Pathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e01517-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wu, S.; Yin, D.; Zhi, P.; Guo, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, D.; Hu, F. In Vitro Activity of MRX-8 and Comparators Against Clinical Isolated Gram-Negative Bacilli in China. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 829592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Qu, X.; Guo, C.; Liu, S.; Li, X.; Xi, L.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J. Pharmacokinetics and Nephrotoxicity of Polymyxin MRX-8 in Rats: A Novel Agent against Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rosato, A.; Vicarini, H.; Bonnefoy, A.; Chantot, J.-F.; Leclercq, R. A New Ketolide, HMR 3004, Active against Streptococci Inducibly Resistant to Erythromycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998, 42, 1392–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Flamm, R.K.; Rhomberg, P.R.; Sader, H.S. In Vitro Activity of the Novel Lactone Ketolide Nafithromycin (WCK 4873) against Contemporary Clinical Bacteria from a Global Surveillance Program. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e01230-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Aslan, A.T.; Akova, M.; Paterson, D.L. Next-Generation Polymyxin Class of Antibiotics: A Ray of Hope Illuminating a Dark Road. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Griffith, D.; Carmeli, Y.; Gehrke, S.; Morgan, E.; Dudley, M.; Loutit, J. 217. A Phase 1 Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Multiple Doses of the Lipopeptide QPX9003 in Healthy Adult Subjects. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2022, 9, ofac492.295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Roberts, K.D.; Zhu, Y.; Azad, M.A.K.; Han, M.-L.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Yu, H.H.; Horne, A.S.; Pinson, J.-A.; Rudd, D.; et al. A Synthetic Lipopeptide Targeting Top-Priority Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Recce Gets Safety Committee Advice for Phase I RECCE 327 Trial Progress. Available online: https://www.clinicaltrialsarena.com/news/recce-committee-trial-progress/ (accessed on 1 February 2026).
- Recce® 327 i.v. Recce Pharmaceuticals/Clinicalcandidates/Sepsis; Recce Pharmaceuticals: Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2024; Available online: https://www.recce.com.au/product-candidates/sepsis (accessed on 29 February 2024).
- Bruss, J.; Lister, T.; Gupta, V.K.; Stone, E.; Morelli, L.; Lei, Y.; Melnick, D. Single- and Multiple-Ascending-Dose Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of the Polymyxin Derivative SPR206. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 65, e00739-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Chen, H.; Li, H.; Zhang, F.; Wang, H. Evaluation of the in Vitro Activity of New Polymyxin B Analogue SPR206 against Clinical MDR, Colistin-Resistant and Tigecycline-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 2609–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mendes, R.E.; Sader, H.S.; Ryan Arends, S.J.; Cotroneo, N.; Critchley, I.A.; Critchley, I.A.; Castanheira, M. 1676. Activity of SPR206 and Comparator Agents Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii Causing Infections in United States Hospitals. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2022, 9, ofac492.1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gill, C.M.; Nicolau, D.P. In Vivo Pharmacodynamic Profile of EVER206, a Novel Polymyxin Antimicrobial, against Gram-Negative Bacteria in the Murine Thigh Infection Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2023, 67, e01738-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Brown, P.; Abbott, E.; Abdulle, O.; Boakes, S.; Coleman, S.; Divall, N.; Duperchy, E.; Moss, S.; Rivers, D.; Simonovic, M.; et al. Design of Next Generation Polymyxins with Lower Toxicity: The Discovery of SPR206. ACS Infect. Dis. 2019, 5, 1645–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lomovskaya, O.; Tsivkovski, R.; Sun, D.; Reddy, R.; Totrov, M.; Hecker, S.; Griffith, D.; Loutit, J.; Dudley, M. QPX7728, An Ultra-Broad-Spectrum B-Lactamase Inhibitor for Intravenous and Oral Therapy: Overview of Biochemical and Microbiological Characteristics. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 697180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Reddy, K.R.; Parkinson, J.; Sabet, M.; Tarazi, Z.; Boyer, S.H.; Lomovskaya, O.; Griffith, D.C.; Hecker, S.J.; Dudley, M.N. Selection of QPX7831, an Orally Bioavailable Prodrug of Boronic Acid β-Lactamase Inhibitor QPX7728. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 17523–17529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hecker, S.J.; Reddy, K.R.; Lomovskaya, O.; Griffith, D.C.; Rubio-Aparicio, D.; Nelson, K.; Tsivkovski, R.; Sun, D.; Sabet, M.; Tarazi, Z.; et al. Discovery of Cyclic Boronic Acid QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-β-Lactamases. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 7491–7507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tsivkovski, R.; Totrov, M.; Lomovskaya, O. Biochemical Characterization of QPX7728, a New Ultrabroad-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-Beta-Lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00130-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Sun, D.; Tsivkovski, R.; Pogliano, J.; Tsunemoto, H.; Nelson, K.; Rubio-Aparicio, D.; Lomovskaya, O. Intrinsic Antibacterial Activity of Xeruborbactam In Vitro: Assessing Spectrum and Mode of Action. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2022, 66, e00879-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Nelson, K.; Rubio-Aparicio, D.; Sun, D.; Dudley, M.; Lomovskaya, O. In Vitro Activity of the Ultrabroad-Spectrum-Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor QPX7728 against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales with Varying Intrinsic and Acquired Resistance Mechanisms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00757-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lomovskaya, O.; Rubio-Aparicio, D.; Tsivkovski, R.; Loutit, J.; Dudley, M. The Ultrabroad-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor QPX7728 Restores the Potency of Multiple Oral Beta-Lactam Antibiotics against Beta-Lactamase-Producing Strains of Resistant Enterobacterales. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2022, 66, e02168-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Lomovskaya, O.; Nelson, K.; Rubio-Aparicio, D.; Tsivkovski, R.; Sun, D.; Dudley, M.N. Impact of Intrinsic Resistance Mechanisms on Potency of QPX7728, a New Ultrabroad-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor of Serine and Metallo-Beta-Lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00552-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sabet, M.; Tarazi, Z.; Griffith, D.C. In Vivo Activity of QPX7728, an Ultrabroad-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor, in Combination with Beta-Lactams against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e01267-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Huband, M.D.; Thompson, J.D.; Gurung, N.D.; Liu, Q.; Li, L.; Zhang, J.; Streit, J.M.; Castanheira, M. Activity of the Novel Aminomethylcycline KBP-7072 and Comparators against 1057 Geographically Diverse Recent Clinical Isolates from the SENTRY Surveillance Program, 2019. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2022, 66, e01397-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pfaller, M.A.; Li, L.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Huband, M.D.; Lindley, J.M.; Mendes, R.E. In Vitro Activity of a Novel Aminomethylcycline Antibacterial (KBP-7072), a Third-Generation Tetracycline, against Clinical Isolates with Molecularly Characterized Tetracycline Resistance Mechanisms. JAC Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 3, dlab177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Han, R.; Ding, L.; Yang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Yin, D.; Wu, S.; Zhi, P.; Zhu, D.; Liu, Q.; Tan, X.; et al. In Vitro Activity of KBP-7072 against 536 Acinetobacter baumannii Complex Isolates Collected in China. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e01471-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lepak, A.J.; Zhao, M.; Liu, Q.; Wang, P.; Wang, Y.; Bader, J.C.; Ambrose, P.G.; Andes, D.R. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of a Novel Aminomethylcycline Antibiotic, KBP-7072, in the Neutropenic Murine Pneumonia Model against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e02404-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, L.; Tan, X.; Zhou, T.; Chi, S.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J. In Vivo Efficacy and PK/PD Analyses of Zifanocycline (KBP-7072), an Aminomethylcycline Antibiotic, against Acinetobacter baumannii in a Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model. J. Infect. Chemother. 2024, 30, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kaminishi, T.; Schedlbauer, A.; Ochoa-Lizarralde, B.; De Astigarraga, E.; Çapuni, R.; Yang, F.; Benn, V.; Liu, Q.; Tan, X.; Zhang, M.; et al. The Third-Generation Tetracycline, KBP-7072, Exploits and Reveals a New Potential of the Primary Tetracycline Binding Pocket. bioRxiv 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zampaloni, C.; Mattei, P.; Bleicher, K.; Winther, L.; Thäte, C.; Bucher, C.; Adam, J.-M.; Alanine, A.; Amrein, K.E.; Baidin, V.; et al. A Novel Antibiotic Class Targeting the Lipopolysaccharide Transporter. Nature 2024, 625, 566–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Magri, M.; Eljaoudi, R.; Belyamani, L.; Ibrahimi, A.; Bouricha, E.M. In Silico Analysis of Zosurabalpin-LptB2FG Binding in Acinetobacter spp., Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Shigella flexneri: Mechanisms Underlying Its Differential Efficacy. Silico Pharmacol. 2025, 13, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Guenther, A.; Millar, L.; Messer, A.; Giraudon, M.; Patel, K.; Deurloo, E.J.; Lobritz, M.; Gloge, A. 2126. Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics (PK) in Healthy Participants Following Single Dose Administration of Zosurabalpin, a Novel Pathogen-Specific Antibiotic for the Treatment of Serious Acinetobacter Infections. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2023, 10, ofad500.1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lomovskaya, O.; Castanheira, M.; Lindley, J.; Rubio-Aparicio, D.; Nelson, K.; Tsivkovski, R.; Sun, D.; Totrov, M.; Loutit, J.; Dudley, M. In Vitro Potency of Xeruborbactam in Combination with Multiple β-Lactam Antibiotics in Comparison with Other β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor (BLI) Combinations against Carbapenem-Resistant and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2023, 67, e00440-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mandel, S.; Michaeli, J.; Nur, N.; Erbetti, I.; Zazoun, J.; Ferrari, L.; Felici, A.; Cohen-Kutner, M.; Bachnoff, N. OMN6 a Novel Bioengineered Peptide for the Treatment of Multidrug Resistant Gram Negative Bacteria. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, X.; Wu, X.; Tang, J.; Zhang, L.; Jia, X. Trends and Development in the Antibiotic-Resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii: A Scientometric Research Study (1991–2019). Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 3195–3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jangid, H.; Kumar, D.; Kumar, G.; Kumar, R.; Mamidi, N. Bibliometric Examination of Global Scientific Research about Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Vázquez-López, R.; Solano-Gálvez, S.G.; Vignon-Whaley, J.J.J.; Vaamonde, J.A.A.; Alonzo, L.A.P.; Reséndiz, A.R.; Álvarez, M.M.; López, E.N.V.; Franyuti-Kelly, G.; Álvarez-Hernández, D.A.; et al. Acinetobacter baumannii Resistance: A Real Challenge for Clinicians. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rajangam, S.L.; Narasimhan, M.K. Current Treatment Strategies for Targeting Virulence Factors and Biofilm Formation in Acinetobacter baumannii. Future Microbiol. 2024, 19, 941–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Marino, A.; Augello, E.; Stracquadanio, S.; Bellanca, C.M.; Cosentino, F.; Spampinato, S.; Cantarella, G.; Bernardini, R.; Stefani, S.; Cacopardo, B.; et al. Unveiling the Secrets of Acinetobacter baumannii: Resistance, Current Treatments, and Future Innovations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nie, D.; Hu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, M.; Hou, Z.; Luo, X.; Mao, X.; Xue, X. Outer Membrane Protein A (OmpA) as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Acinetobacter baumannii Infection. J. Biomed. Sci. 2020, 27, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Uppalapati, S.R.; Sett, A.; Pathania, R. The Outer Membrane Proteins OmpA, CarO, and OprD of Acinetobacter baumannii Confer a Two-Pronged Defense in Facilitating Its Success as a Potent Human Pathogen. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 589234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sugawara, E.; Nikaido, H. OmpA Is the Principal Nonspecific Slow Porin of Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 4089–4096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gaddy, J.A.; Tomaras, A.P.; Actis, L.A. The Acinetobacter baumannii 19606 OmpA Protein Plays a Role in Biofilm Formation on Abiotic Surfaces and in the Interaction of This Pathogen with Eukaryotic Cells. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 3150–3160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Choi, C.H.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, Y.C.; Park, T.I.; Lee, J.C. Acinetobacter baumannii Invades Epithelial Cells and Outer Membrane Protein A Mediates Interactions with Epithelial Cells. BMC Microbiol. 2008, 8, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Choi, C.H.; Hyun, S.H.; Lee, J.Y.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, Y.S.; Kim, S.A.; Chae, J.-P.; Yoo, S.M.; Lee, J.C. Acinetobacter baumannii Outer Membrane Protein A Targets the Nucleus and Induces Cytotoxicity. Cell Microbiol. 2008, 10, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zahn, M.; Bhamidimarri, S.P.; Baslé, A.; Winterhalter, M.; van den Berg, B. Structural Insights into Outer Membrane Permeability of Acinetobacter baumannii. Structure 2016, 24, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nikaido, H. Molecular Basis of Bacterial Outer Membrane Permeability Revisited. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2003, 67, 593–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Abdi, S.N.; Ghotaslou, R.; Ganbarov, K.; Mobed, A.; Tanomand, A.; Yousefi, M.; Asgharzadeh, M.; Kafil, H.S. Acinetobacter baumannii Efflux Pumps and Antibiotic Resistance. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 423–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kaur, M.; Mingeot-Leclercq, M.-P. Maintenance of Bacterial Outer Membrane Lipid Asymmetry: Insight into MlaA. BMC Microbiol. 2024, 24, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ekiert, D.C.; Coudray, N.; Bhabha, G. Structure and Mechanism of the Bacterial Lipid ABC Transporter, MlaFEDB. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2022, 76, 102429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kamischke, C.; Fan, J.; Bergeron, J.; Kulasekara, H.D.; Dalebroux, Z.D.; Burrell, A.; Kollman, J.M.; Miller, S.I. The Acinetobacter baumannii Mla System and Glycerophospholipid Transport to the Outer Membrane. eLife 2019, 8, e40171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Noel, H.R.; Keerthi, S.; Ren, X.; Winkelman, J.D.; Troutman, J.M.; Palmer, L.D. Genetic Synergy in Acinetobacter baumannii Undecaprenyl Biosynthesis and Maintenance of Lipid Asymmetry Impacts Outer Membrane and Antimicrobial Resistance. bioRxiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Harding, C.M.; Hennon, S.W.; Feldman, M.F. Uncovering the Mechanisms of Acinetobacter baumannii Virulence. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lees-Miller, R.G.; Iwashkiw, J.A.; Scott, N.E.; Seper, A.; Vinogradov, E.; Schild, S.; Feldman, M.F. A Common Pathway for O-Linked Protein-Glycosylation and Synthesis of Capsule in Acinetobacter baumannii. Mol. Microbiol. 2013, 89, 816–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cain, A.K.; Hamidian, M. Portrait of a Killer: Uncovering Resistance Mechanisms and Global Spread of Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS Pathog. 2023, 19, e1011520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- VanOtterloo, L.M.; Macias, L.A.; Powers, M.J.; Brodbelt, J.S.; Trent, M.S. Characterization of Acinetobacter baumannii Core Oligosaccharide Synthesis Reveals Novel Aspects of Lipooligosaccharide Assembly. mBio 2024, 15, e03013-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Boll, J.M.; Tucker, A.T.; Klein, D.R.; Beltran, A.M.; Brodbelt, J.S.; Davies, B.W.; Trent, M.S. Reinforcing Lipid A Acylation on the Cell Surface of Acinetobacter baumannii Promotes Cationic Antimicrobial Peptide Resistance and Desiccation Survival. mBio 2015, 6, e00478-00415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Potron, A.; Poirel, L.; Nordmann, P. Emerging Broad-Spectrum Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii: Mechanisms and Epidemiology. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2015, 45, 568–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Adams, M.D.; Nickel, G.C.; Bajaksouzian, S.; Lavender, H.; Murthy, A.R.; Jacobs, M.R.; Bonomo, R.A. Resistance to Colistin in Acinetobacter baumannii Associated with Mutations in the PmrAB Two-Component System. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 3628–3634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chin, C.-Y.; Gregg, K.A.; Napier, B.A.; Ernst, R.K.; Weiss, D.S. A PmrB-Regulated Deacetylase Required for Lipid A Modification and Polymyxin Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 7911–7914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kumar, G. Natural Peptides and Their Synthetic Congeners Acting against Acinetobacter baumannii through the Membrane and Cell Wall: Latest Progress. RSC Med. Chem. 2025, 16, 561–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Moffatt, J.H.; Harper, M.; Boyce, J.D. Mechanisms of Polymyxin Resistance. In Polymyxin Antibiotics: From Laboratory Bench to Bedside; Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Spring: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; Volume 1145, pp. 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gao, S.; Jin, W.; Quan, Y.; Li, Y.; Shen, Y.; Yuan, S.; Yi, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. Bacterial Capsules: Occurrence, Mechanism, and Function. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 2024, 10, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Niu, T.; Guo, L.; Luo, Q.; Zhou, K.; Yu, W.; Chen, Y.; Huang, C.; Xiao, Y. Wza Gene Knockout Decreases Acinetobacter baumannii Virulence and Affects Wzy-Dependent Capsular Polysaccharide Synthesis. Virulence 2020, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Singh, J.K.; Adams, F.G.; Brown, M.H. Diversity and Function of Capsular Polysaccharide in Acinetobacter baumannii. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 3301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Talyansky, Y.; Nielsen, T.B.; Yan, J.; Carlino-Macdonald, U.; Venanzio, G.D.; Chakravorty, S.; Ulhaq, A.; Feldman, M.F.; Russo, T.A.; Vinogradov, E.; et al. Capsule Carbohydrate Structure Determines Virulence in Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Geisinger, E.; Isberg, R.R. Antibiotic Modulation of Capsular Exopolysaccharide and Virulence in Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Russo, T.A.; Luke, N.R.; Beanan, J.M.; Olson, R.; Sauberan, S.L.; MacDonald, U.; Schultz, L.W.; Umland, T.C.; Campagnari, A.A. The K1 Capsular Polysaccharide of Acinetobacter baumannii Strain 307-0294 Is a Major Virulence Factor. Infect. Immun. 2010, 78, 3993–4000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Jamal, M.; Ahmad, W.; Andleeb, S.; Jalil, F.; Imran, M.; Nawaz, M.A.; Hussain, T.; Ali, M.; Rafiq, M.; Kamil, M.A. Bacterial Biofilm and Associated Infections. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2018, 81, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yehya, A.; Ezzeddine, Z.; Chakkour, M.; Dhaini, Z.; Bou Saba, M.S.; Bou Saba, A.S.; Nohra, L.; Nassar, N.B.; Yassine, M.; Bahmad, H.F.; et al. The Intricacies of Acinetobacter baumannii: A Multifaceted Comprehensive Review of a Multidrug-Resistant Pathogen and Its Clinical Significance and Implications. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1565965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lai, S.-J.; Tu, I.-F.; Tseng, T.-S.; Tsai, Y.-H.; Wu, S.-H. The Deficiency of Poly-β-1,6-N-Acetyl-Glucosamine Deacetylase Trigger A. baumannii to Convert to Biofilm-Independent Colistin-Tolerant Cells. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Uruén, C.; Chopo-Escuin, G.; Tommassen, J.; Mainar-Jaime, R.C.; Arenas, J. Biofilms as Promoters of Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance and Tolerance. Antibiotics 2020, 10, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tomlinson, B.R.; Denham, G.A.; Torres, N.J.; Brzozowski, R.S.; Allen, J.L.; Jackson, J.K.; Eswara, P.J.; Shaw, L.N. Assessing the Role of Cold-Shock Protein C: A Novel Regulator of Acinetobacter baumannii Biofilm Formation and Virulence. Infect. Immun. 2022, 90, e0037622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Scribano, D.; Cheri, E.; Pompilio, A.; Di Bonaventura, G.; Belli, M.; Cristina, M.; Sansone, L.; Zagaglia, C.; Sarshar, M.; Palamara, A.T.; et al. Acinetobacter baumannii OmpA-like Porins: Functional Characterization of Bacterial Physiology, Antibiotic-Resistance, and Virulence. Commun. Biol. 2024, 7, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Brossard, K.A.; Campagnari, A.A. The Acinetobacter baumannii Biofilm-Associated Protein Plays a Role in Adherence to Human Epithelial Cells. Infect. Immun. 2012, 80, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Upmanyu, K.; Haq, Q.M.R.; Singh, R. Factors Mediating Acinetobacter baumannii Biofilm Formation: Opportunities for Developing Therapeutics. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2022, 3, 100131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Armalytė, J.; Čepauskas, A.; Šakalytė, G.; Martinkus, J.; Skerniškytė, J.; Martens, C.; Sužiedėlienė, E.; Garcia-Pino, A.; Jurėnas, D. A Polyamine Acetyltransferase Regulates the Motility and Biofilm Formation of Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ling, W.; Furuya-Kanamori, L.; Ezure, Y.; Harris, P.N.A.; Paterson, D.L. Adverse Clinical Outcomes Associated with Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter (CRA) Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAC Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 3, dlab157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gajic, I.; Kabic, J.; Kekic, D.; Jovicevic, M.; Milenkovic, M.; Mitic Culafic, D.; Trudic, A.; Ranin, L.; Opavski, N. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Comprehensive Review of Currently Used Methods. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Vasala, A.; Hytönen, V.P.; Laitinen, O.H. Modern Tools for Rapid Diagnostics of Antimicrobial Resistance. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Elbehiry, A.; Aldubaib, M.; Abalkhail, A.; Marzouk, E.; Albeloushi, A.; Moussa, I.; Ibrahem, M.; Albazie, H.; Alqarni, A.; Anagreyyah, S.; et al. How MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Technology Contributes to Microbial Infection Control in Healthcare Settings. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Eyre, D.W. Infection prevention and control insights from a decade of pathogen whole-genome sequencing. J. Hosp. Infect. 2022, 122, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Satam, H.; Joshi, K.; Mangrolia, U.; Waghoo, S.; Zaidi, G.; Rawool, S.; Thakare, R.P.; Banday, S.; Mishra, A.K.; Das, G.; et al. Next-Generation Sequencing Technology: Current Trends and Advancements. Biology 2023, 12, 997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Velican, A.M.; Măruţescu, L.; Kamerzan, C.; Cristea, V.C.; Banu, O.; Borcan, E.; Chifiriuc, M.-C. Rapid Detection and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli by Flow Cytometry. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ardila, C.M.; Jiménez-Arbeláez, G.A.; Vivares-Builes, A.M. The Potential Clinical Applications of a Microfluidic Lab-on-a-Chip for the Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Enterococcus faecalis-Associated Endodontic Infections: A Systematic Review. Dent. J. 2024, 12, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tao, S.; Chen, H.; Li, N.; Liang, W. The Application of the CRISPR-Cas System in Antibiotic Resistance. Infect. Drug Resist. 2022, 15, 4155–4168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Comini, S.; Bianco, G.; Boattini, M.; Iannaccone, M.; Casale, R.; Banche, G.; Cavallo, R.; Costa, C. Evaluation of the Amplex Eazyplex SuperBug Acineto Test for Direct Detection of Multi-Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Bloodstream Infections in High Endemicity Settings. J. Hosp. Infect. 2021, 117, 179–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mancini, S.; Seth-Smith, H.M.B.; Kolesnik-Goldmann, N.; Hinic, V.; Roloff, T.; Imkamp, F.; Egli, A. Evaluation of the RESIST ACINETO Multiplex Immunochromatographic Assay for Detection of OXA-23-like, OXA-40/58-like and NDM Carbapenemase Production in Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2023, 78, 2771–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Magill, S.S.; Edwards, J.R.; Bamberg, W.; Beldavs, Z.G.; Dumyati, G.; Kainer, M.A.; Lynfield, R.; Maloney, M.; McAllister-Hollod, L.; Nadle, J.; et al. Multistate Point-Prevalence Survey of Health Care–Associated Infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 1198–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Lob, S.H.; Hoban, D.J.; Sahm, D.F.; Badal, R.E. Regional Differences and Trends in Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2016, 47, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Towner, K.J. Acinetobacter: An Old Friend, but a New Enemy. J. Hosp. Infect. 2009, 73, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Olaitan, A.O.; Morand, S.; Rolain, J.-M. Mechanisms of Polymyxin Resistance: Acquired and Intrinsic Resistance in Bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rai, S.; Kumar, A. Bacteriophage Therapeutics to Confront Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii—A Global Health Menace. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2022, 14, 347–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tu, Q.; Pu, M.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, M.; Song, L.; Li, M.; An, X.; Fan, H.; Tong, Y. Acinetobacter baumannii Phages: Past, Present and Future. Viruses 2023, 15, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Vukotic, G.; Obradovic, M.; Novovic, K.; Di Luca, M.; Jovcic, B.; Fira, D.; Neve, H.; Kojic, M.; McAuliffe, O. Characterization, Antibiofilm, and Depolymerizing Activity of Two Phages Active on Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pires, D.P.; Melo, L.; Vilas Boas, D.; Sillankorva, S.; Azeredo, J. Phage Therapy as an Alternative or Complementary Strategy to Prevent and Control Biofilm-Related Infections. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017, 39, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Uchechukwu, C.F.; Shonekan, A. Current Status of Clinical Trials for Phage Therapy. J. Med. Microbiol. 2024, 73, 001895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nir-Paz, R.; Gelman, D.; Khouri, A.; Sisson, B.M.; Fackler, J.; Alkalay-Oren, S.; Khalifa, L.; Rimon, A.; Yerushalmy, O.; Bader, R.; et al. Successful Treatment of Antibiotic-resistant, Poly-microbial Bone Infection with Bacteriophages and Antibiotics Combination. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 69, 2015–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chen, L.K.; Chang, J.C.; Chu, H.T.; Chen, Y.T.; Jiang, H.L.; Wang, L.S.; Teh, S.H.; Yang, H.H.; Chen, D.S.; Li, Y.Z.; et al. Preoptimized phage cocktail for use in aerosols against nosocomial transmission of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: A 3-year prospective intervention study. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 236, 113476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Schooley, R.T.; Biswas, B.; Gill, J.J.; Hernandez-Morales, A.; Lancaster, J.; Lessor, L.; Barr, J.J.; Reed, S.L.; Rohwer, F.; Benler, S.; et al. Development and Use of Personalized Bacteriophage-Based Therapeutic Cocktails To Treat a Patient with a Disseminated Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00954-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Elwakil, W.H.; Rizk, S.S.; El-Halawany, A.M.; Rateb, M.E.; Attia, A.S. Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections in the United Kingdom versus Egypt: Trends and Potential Natural Products Solutions. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Iswarya Jaisankar, A.; Smiline Girija, A.S.; Gunasekaran, S.; Vijayashree Priyadharsini, J. Molecular Characterisation of csgA Gene among ESBL Strains of A. baumannii and Targeting with Essential Oil Compounds from Azadirachta indica. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2020, 32, 3380–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gutierrez-Montiel, D.; Guerrero-Barrera, A.L.; Ramírez-Castillo, F.Y.; Galindo-Guerrero, F.; Ornelas-García, I.G.; Chávez-Vela, N.A.; de O. Costa, M.; Avelar-Gonzalez, F.J.; Moreno-Flores, A.C.; Vazquez-Pedroza, E.; et al. Guava Leaf Extract Exhibits Antimicrobial Activity in Extensively Drug-Resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter baumannii. Molecules 2025, 30, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Guglielmi, P.; Pontecorvi, V.; Rotondi, G. Natural compounds and extracts as novel antimicrobial agents. Expert. Opin. Ther. Pat. 2020, 30, 949–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Vila-Farres, X.; Chu, J.; Ternei, M.A.; Lemetre, C.; Park, S.; Perlin, D.S.; Brady, S.F. An Optimized Synthetic-Bioinformatic Natural Product Antibiotic Sterilizes Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-Infected Wounds. mSphere 2018, 3, e00528-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Iskandar, K.; Ahmed, N.; Paudyal, N.; Alvarez, M.J.R.; Balasubramani, S.P.; Saadeh, D.; Baig, S.U.; Sami, H.; Halat, D.H.; Pavlović, N.; et al. Essential Oils as Antimicrobial Agents Against WHO Priority Bacterial Pathogens: A Strategic Review of In Vitro Clinical Efficacy, Innovations and Research Gaps. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Abbasi, Z.; Ghasemi, S.M.; Ahmadi, Y.; Shokri, D. Isolation and Identification of Effective Probiotics on Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Strains and Their Biofilms. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2024, 2024, 8570521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rabetafika, H.N.; Razafindralambo, A.; Ebenso, B.; Razafindralambo, H. Probiotics as Antibiotic Alternatives for Human and Animal Applications. Encyclopedia 2023, 3, 561–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rohokale, R.; Guo, Z. Development in the Concept of Bacterial Polysaccharide Repeating Unit-Based Antibacterial Conjugate Vaccines. ACS Infect. Dis. 2023, 9, 178–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mendes, S.G.; Combo, S.I.; Allain, T.; Domingues, S.; Buret, A.G.; Da Silva, G.J. Co-Regulation of Biofilm Formation and Antimicrobial Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: From Mechanisms to Therapeutic Strategies. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2023, 42, 1405–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Barbarossa, A.; Rosato, A.; Corbo, F.; Clodoveo, M.L.; Fracchiolla, G.; Carrieri, A.; Carocci, A. Non-Antibiotic Drug Repositioning as an Alternative Antimicrobial Approach. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Ugurel, E.; Turgut-Balik, D. Synergistic Combination of Carvedilol, Amlodipine, Amitriptyline, and Antibiotics as an Alternative Treatment Approach for the Susceptible and Multidrug-Resistant A. baumannii Infections via Drug Repurposing. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2023, 42, 1063–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gontijo, A.V.L.; Pereira, S.L.; de Lacerda Bonfante, H. Can Drug Repurposing Be Effective Against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii? Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 79, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mahlapuu, M.; Håkansson, J.; Ringstad, L.; Björn, C. Antimicrobial Peptides: An Emerging Category of Therapeutic Agents. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Koo, H.B.; Seo, J. Antimicrobial Peptides under Clinical Investigation. Pept. Sci. 2019, 111, e24122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ergene, C.; Yasuhara, K.; Palermo, E.F. Biomimetic Antimicrobial Polymers: Recent Advances in Molecular Design. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9, 2407–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pham, P.; Oliver, S.; Boyer, C. Design of Antimicrobial Polymers. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2023, 224, 2200226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cheng, Z.; Raffa, P. From Design to Application: Amphiphilic Copolymers as Antimicrobial Materials. Mater. Adv. 2025, 6, 4939–4968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tan, J.; Zhao, Y.; Hedrick, J.L.; Yang, Y.Y. Effects of Hydrophobicity on Antimicrobial Activity, Selectivity, and Functional Mechanism of Guanidinium-Functionalized Polymers. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2022, 11, 2100482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Fan, D.; Liu, X.; Ren, Y.; Bai, S.; Li, Y.; Luo, Z.; Dong, J.; Chen, F.; Zeng, W. Functional Insights to the Development of Bioactive Material for Combating Bacterial Infections. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1186637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Siegwart, D.J.; Oh, J.K.; Matyjaszewski, K. ATRP in the Design of Functional Materials for Biomedical Applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 18–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Judzewitsch, P.R.; Zhao, L.; Wong, E.H.H.; Boyer, C. High-Throughput Synthesis of Antimicrobial Copolymers and Rapid Evaluation of Their Bioactivity. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 3975–3986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tew, G.N.; Scott, R.W.; Klein, M.L.; DeGrado, W.F. De Novo Design of Antimicrobial Polymers, Foldamers, and Small Molecules: From Discovery to Practical Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kuroda, K.; DeGrado, W.F. Amphiphilic Polymethacrylate Derivatives as Antimicrobial Agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4128–4129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ilker, M.F.; Nüsslein, K.; Tew, G.N.; Coughlin, E.B. Tuning the Hemolytic and Antibacterial Activities of Amphiphilic Polynorbornene Derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15870–15875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mowery, B.P.; Lee, S.E.; Kissounko, D.A.; Epand, R.F.; Epand, R.M.; Weisblum, B.; Stahl, S.S.; Gellman, S.H. Mimicry of Antimicrobial Host-Defense Peptides by Random Copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15474–15476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Oda, Y.; Kanaoka, S.; Sato, T.; Aoshima, S.; Kuroda, K. Block versus Random Amphiphilic Copolymers as Antibacterial Agents. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 3581–3591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Palermo, E.F.; Kuroda, K. Structural Determinants of Antimicrobial Activity in Polymers Which Mimic Host Defense Peptides. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 1605–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kuroda, K.; Caputo, G.A. Antimicrobial Polymers as Synthetic Mimics of Host-Defense Peptides. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2013, 5, 49–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Benkhaled, B.T.; Hadiouch, S.; Olleik, H.; Perrier, J.; Ysacco, C.; Guillaneuf, Y.; Gigmes, D.; Maresca, M.; Lefay, C. Elaboration of Antimicrobial Polymeric Materials by Dispersion of Well-Defined Amphiphilic Methacrylic SG1-Based Copolymers. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9, 3127–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Taresco, V.; Crisante, F.; Francolini, I.; Martinelli, A.; D’Ilario, L.; Ricci-Vitiani, L.; Buccarelli, M.; Pietrelli, L.; Piozzi, A. Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Amphiphilic Random Copolymers to Address Medical Device-Centered Infections. Acta Biomater. 2015, 22, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Qiu, H.; Si, Z.; Luo, Y.; Feng, P.; Wu, X.; Hou, W.; Zhu, Y.; Chan-Park, M.B.; Xu, L.; Huang, D. The Mechanisms and the Applications of Antibacterial Polymers in Surface Modification on Medical Devices. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Nederberg, F.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, J.P.K.; Xu, K.; Wang, H.; Yang, C.; Gao, S.; Guo, X.D.; Fukushima, K.; Li, L.; et al. Biodegradable Nanostructures with Selective Lysis of Microbial Membranes. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Qiao, Y.; Yang, C.; Coady, D.J.; Ong, Z.Y.; Hedrick, J.L.; Yang, Y.-Y. Highly Dynamic Biodegradable Micelles Capable of Lysing Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacterial Membrane. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 1146–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tardy, A.; Nicolas, J.; Gigmes, D.; Lefay, C.; Guillaneuf, Y. Radical Ring-Opening Polymerization: Scope, Limitations, and Application to (Bio)Degradable Materials. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 1319–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pesenti, T.; Nicolas, J. 100th Anniversary of Macromolecular Science Viewpoint: Degradable Polymers from Radical Ring-Opening Polymerization: Latest Advances, New Directions, and Ongoing Challenges. ACS Macro Lett. 2020, 9, 1812–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Agarwal, S.; Speyerer, C. Degradable Blends of Semi-Crystalline and Amorphous Branched Poly(Caprolactone): Effect of Microstructure on Blend Properties. Polymer 2010, 51, 1024–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bingham, N.M.; Roth, P.J. Degradable Vinyl Copolymers through Thiocarbonyl Addition–Ring-Opening (TARO) Polymerization. Chem. Commun. 2018, 55, 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Smith, R.A.; Fu, G.; McAteer, O.; Xu, M.; Gutekunst, W.R. Radical Approach to Thioester-Containing Polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 1446–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ivanchenko, O.; Authesserre, U.; Coste, G.; Mazières, S.; Destarac, M.; Harrisson, S. ε-Thionocaprolactone: An Accessible Monomer for Preparation of Degradable Poly(Vinyl Esters) by Radical Ring-Opening Polymerization. Polym. Chem. 2021, 12, 1931–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yang, C.; Lou, W.; Zhong, G.; Lee, A.; Leong, J.; Chin, W.; Ding, B.; Bao, C.; Tan, J.P.K.; Pu, Q.; et al. Degradable Antimicrobial Polycarbonates with Unexpected Activity and Selectivity for Treating Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Lung Infection in Mice. Acta Biomater. 2019, 94, 268–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ding, X.; Yang, C.; Moreira, W.; Yuan, P.; Periaswamy, B.; de Sessions, P.F.; Zhao, H.; Tan, J.; Lee, A.; Ong, K.X.; et al. A Macromolecule Reversing Antibiotic Resistance Phenotype and Repurposing Drugs as Potent Antibiotics. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 2001374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Leong, J.; Yang, C.; Tan, J.; Tan, B.Q.; Hor, S.; Hedrick, J.L.; Yang, Y.Y. Combination of Guanidinium and Quaternary Ammonium Polymers with Distinctive Antimicrobial Mechanisms Achieving a Synergistic Antimicrobial Effect. Biomater. Sci. 2020, 8, 6920–6929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhong, G.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, K.; Wen, L.; Lu, H.; Zheng, Y. Synergistic Antimicrobial Activity of a Novel Cationic Micelle L/D2 and Imipenem against Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Front. Biosci. 2021, 26, 977–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bevilacqua, M.P.; Huang, D.J.; Wall, B.D.; Lane, S.J.; Edwards, C.K., III; Hanson, J.A.; Benitez, D.; Solomkin, J.S.; Deming, T.J. Amino Acid Block Copolymers with Broad Antimicrobial Activity and Barrier Properties. Macromol Biosci. 2017, 17, 1600492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Giri, A.; Aquib, M.; Choudhury, A.; Kannaujiya, V.K.; Lim, J.L.; Gu, Z.; Lenardon, M.D.; Boyer, C. Lipoic Acid Based Redox-Responsive Degradable Antimicrobial Polymers. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2025, 46, e00224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Si, Z.; Li, J.; Ruan, L.; Reghu, S.; Ooi, Y.J.; Li, P.; Zhu, Y.; Hammond, P.T.; Verma, C.S.; Bazan, G.C.; et al. Designer Co-Beta-Peptide Copolymer Selectively Targets Resistant and Biofilm Gram-Negative Bacteria. Biomaterials 2023, 294, 122004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Atif, M.; Babuççu, G.; Riool, M.; Zaat, S.; Jonas, U. Antimicrobial Peptide SAAP-148-Functionalized Hydrogels from Photocrosslinkable Polymers with Broad Antibacterial Activity. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2024, 45, 2400785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yeo, C.K.; Vikhe, Y.S.; Li, P.; Guo, Z.; Greenberg, P.; Duan, H.; Tan, N.S.; Chan-Park, M.B. Hydrogel Effects Rapid Biofilm Debridement with Ex Situ Contact-Kill to Eliminate Multidrug Resistant Bacteria in Vivo. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 20356–20367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chin, W.; Zhong, G.; Pu, Q.; Yang, C.; Lou, W.; De Sessions, P.F.; Periaswamy, B.; Lee, A.; Liang, Z.C.; Ding, X.; et al. A Macromolecular Approach to Eradicate Multidrug Resistant Bacterial Infections While Mitigating Drug Resistance Onset. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Salek, P.; Trousil, J.; Novackova, J.; Hromadkova, J.; Mahun, A.; Kobera, L. Poly[2-(Dimethylamino)Ethyl Methacrylate-Co-Ethylene Dimethacrylate]Nanogel by Dispersion Polymerization for Inhibition of Pathogenic Bacteria. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 33461–33470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lam, S.J.; O’Brien-Simpson, N.M.; Pantarat, N.; Sulistio, A.; Wong, E.H.; Chen, Y.Y.; Lenzo, J.C.; Holden, J.A.; Blencowe, A.; Reynolds, E.C.; et al. Combating Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria with Structurally Nanoengineered Antimicrobial Peptide Polymers. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 1, 16162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Judzewitsch, P.R.; Nguyen, T.K.; Shanmugam, S.; Wong, E.H.H.; Boyer, C. Towards Sequence-Controlled Antimicrobial Polymers: Effect of Polymer Block Order on Antimicrobial Activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2018, 57, 4559–4564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Brisbois, E.J.; Bayliss, J.; Wu, J.; Major, T.C.; Xi, C.; Wang, S.C.; Bartlett, R.H.; Handa, H.; Meyerhoff, M.E. Optimized Polymeric Film-Based Nitric Oxide Delivery Inhibits Bacterial Growth in a Mouse Burn Wound Model. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 4136–4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lehnen, A.C.; Bapolisi, A.M.; Krass, M.; AlSawaf, A.; Kurki, J.; Kersting, S.; Fuchs, H.; Hartlieb, M. Shape Matters: Highly Selective Antimicrobial Bottle Brush Copolymers via a One-Pot RAFT Polymerization Approach. Biomacromolecules 2022, 23, 5350–5360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Cuervo-Rodríguez, R.; Muñoz-Bonilla, A.; López-Fabal, F.; Fernández-García, M. Hemolytic and Antimicrobial Activities of a Series of Cationic Amphiphilic Copolymers Comprised of Same Centered Comonomers with Thiazole Moieties and Polyethylene Glycol Derivatives. Polymers 2020, 12, 972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Locock, K.E.; Michl, T.D.; Valentin, J.D.; Vasilev, K.; Hayball, J.D.; Qu, Y.; Traven, A.; Griesser, H.J.; Meagher, L.; Haeussler, M. Guanylated Polymethacrylates: A Class of Potent Antimicrobial Polymers with Low Hemolytic Activity. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 4021–4031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Harvey, A.C.; Madsen, J.; Douglas, C.W.I.; MacNeil, S.; Armes, S.P. Antimicrobial Graft Copolymer Gels. Biomacromolecules 2016, 17, 2710–2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kuroki, A.; Sangwan, P.; Qu, Y.; Peltier, R.; Sanchez-Cano, C.; Moat, J.; Dowson, C.G.; Williams, E.G.L.; Locock, K.E.S.; Hartlieb, M.; et al. Sequence Control as a Powerful Tool for Improving the Selectivity of Antimicrobial Polymers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 40117–40126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mortazavian, H.; Foster, L.L.; Bhat, R.; Patel, S.; Kuroda, K. Decoupling the Functional Roles of Cationic and Hydrophobic Groups in the Antimicrobial and Hemolytic Activities of Methacrylate Random Copolymers. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19, 4370–4378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Druvari, D.; Antonopoulou, A.; Lainioti, G.C.; Vlamis-Gardikas, A.; Bokias, G.; Kallitsis, J.K. Preparation of Antimicrobial Coatings from Cross-Linked Copolymers Containing Quaternary Dodecyl-Ammonium Compounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Fernandes, M.C.S.; Branco, R.; Pereira, P.; Coelho, J.F.J.; Morais, P.V.; Serra, A.C. Antimicrobial Activity of Copolymer Structures from Bio-Based Monomers. Biomacromolecules 2024, 25, 7915–7925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Phuong, P.T.; Oliver, S.; He, J.; Wong, E.H.H.; Mathers, R.T.; Boyer, C. Effect of Hydrophobic Groups on Antimicrobial and Hemolytic Activity: Developing a Predictive Tool for Ternary Antimicrobial Polymers. Biomacromolecules 2020, 21, 5241–5255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Su, Y.; Zhi, Z.; Gao, Q.; Xie, M.; Yu, M.; Lei, B.; Li, P.; Ma, P.X. Autoclaving-Derived Surface Coating with In Vitro and In Vivo Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Efficacies. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2017, 6, 1601173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bina, M.; Coats, J.P.; Skowicki, M.; Malekovic, M.; Mihali, V.; Palivan, C.G. Hybrid Planar Copolymer Membranes with Dual Functionality against Bacteria Growth. Langmuir 2024, 40, 23178–23188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Xiao, J.; Yin, M.; Yang, M.; Ren, J.; Liu, C.; Lian, J.; Lu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Luo, J. Lipase and pH-Responsive Diblock Copolymers Featuring Fluorocarbon and Carboxyl Betaine for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections. J. Control. Release 2024, 369, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Druvari, D.; Kyriakopoulou, F.; Lainioti, G.C.; Vlamis-Gardikas, A.; Kallitsis, J.K. Humidity-Responsive Antimicrobial Membranes Based on Cross-Linked Copolymers Functionalized with Ionic Liquid Moieties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 11193–11207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chee, P.L.; Owh, C.; Venkatesh, M.; Periayah, M.H.; Zhang, Z.; Michelle Yew, P.Y.; Ruan, H.; Lakshminarayanan, R.; Kai, D.; Loh, X.J. Cationic Lignin-Based Hyperbranched Polymers to Circumvent Drug Resistance in Pseudomonas keratitis. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 7, 4659–4668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]









| Product Name (Code) | Chemical Class | Mode of Action (MoA) | Innovation Status (WHO Criteria) | Phase | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apramycin (EBL-1003) | Aminoglycoside | Inhibition of protein synthesis (binds to 30S ribosomal subunit). | Not innovative (known classes/targets). | Phase I | [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22] |
| BWC0977 | Bacterial topoisomerase inhibitor (NBTI) | DNA Gyrase GyrA and Topoisomerase IV inhibition (DNA replication/synthesis disruption). | Innovative (new chemical class with lack of known cross-resistance). | Phase I | [23] |
| Cefepime + Zidebactam WCK 5222 | DBO-BLI/PBP2 binder + cephalosporin | Cefepime: Cell wall synthesis inhibition (PBP3). Zidebactam: β-lactam enhancer (binds PBP2) and broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibition. | Not innovative (combination of known classes, though Zidebactam has a novel “enhancer” mechanism). | Phase III | [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34] |
| “Funobactam +imipenem + cilastin” XNW4107 | “BLI + carbapenem + degradation inhibitor” | Imipenem: Cell wall synthesis inhibition. Funobactam: Broad-spectrum diazabicyclooctane (DBO) β-lactamase inhibitor (Classes A, C, D). | Not innovative (combination of known classes). | Phase III | [35,36] |
| KSP-1007 + Meropenem | Boronate BLI + β-lactam (carbapenem) | Meropenem: Cell wall synthesis inhibition. KSP-1007: Broad-spectrum inhibition of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). | Innovative (new chemical class of BLI targeting MBLs). | Phase I | [37] |
| Meropenem + ANT3310 | DBO-BLI/PBP2 binder + β-lactam (carbapenem) | Meropenem: Cell wall synthesis inhibition. ANT3310: DBO-BLI (restoring carbapenem activity against OXA-CRAB and SBLs). | Not innovative (known classes/targets). | Phase I | [38,39] |
| MRX-8 | Polymyxin | Direct membrane effect (disrupts bacterial membranes). | Not innovative (analogue of existing class). | Phase I | [40,41,42,43,44] |
| OMN6 | Insect host defense peptide | Direct membrane effect (selective disruption of bacterial membrane integrity). | Innovative (new chemical class, biological agent). | Phase II | [45,46] |
| QPX9003 | Polymyxin | Direct membrane effect (synthetic polymyxin derivative disrupting the OM). | Inconclusive (or not innovative as it is a derivative of a known class). | Phase I | [47,48,49] |
| Recce-327 R327 | Synthetic (acrolein)polymer | Binds to the OM and disrupts bacterial energy production (ATP), cell growth, and division. | Innovative (new chemical class and MoA). | Phase II | [50,51] |
| Upleganan (SPR-206) | Polymyxin | Direct membrane effect (disrupts bacterial membranes). | Not innovative (analogue of existing class). | Phase I | [52,53,54,55,56] |
| Xeruborbactam + beta-lactam (S-649228) | Boronate-BLI + undisclosed IV β-lactam | Broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibition (serine and MBLs, including KPC, NDM, VIM, OXA-23/48). | Innovative (new chemical class of BLI). | Phase I | [57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65] |
| Zifanocycline (KBP7072) | Tetracycline (aminomethylcycline) | Protein synthesis inhibition. | Not innovative (known class/target; minimal impact of acquired tetracycline resistance). | Phase I | [66,67,68,69,70,71] |
| Zosurabalpin (RG6006) | Macrocyclic peptide | Inhibits lipopolysaccharide (LPS) transport (disrupts Gram-negative cell membranes). | Innovative (new target/mechanism of action). | Phase I | [72,73,74] |
| Polymer Architecture/Chemistry | Degradability | Antimicrobial Activity on A. baumannii | Antimicrobial Activity Other Bacteria (MIC in μg/mL) | Hemolytic Activity HC50 (µg/mL) | Antibiofilm Activity on A. baumannii | In Vivo Efficacy | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cationic block copolymers (Methacrylates) | No | MIC 7.8 µg/mL | E. coli (7.8 to 15.6) P. aeruginosa (15.6) S. aureus (7.8 to 15.6) | 170 to >8000 | No | No | [161] |
| Guanidinium-based polycarbonate | Yes | MIC 16 µg/mL | E. coli (3.9 to 62.5) P. aeruginosa (15.6 to 500) S. aureus (7.8 to 1000) MRSA (8 to 16) | 62.5 to >8000 | No | Yes | [183,184] |
| QAC & Guanidinium homo/copolymers | No | MIC 7.8 to 15.6 µg/mL | E. coli (7.8 to 31.3) K. pneumoniae (7.8 to 125) S. aureus (3.9 to 7.8) | ND | No | No | [185] |
| PEG-PGC20-PLLA20/PDLA2 micelles | Yes | MIC 16 to 256 µg/mL | ND | ND | Yes Disruptive at MIC | Yes | [186] |
| K100L40 block copolymers | Yes | MIC 100 µg/mL | S. aureus (100) MRSA (100) E. coli (100) P. aeruginosa (100) K. pneumoniae (100) | ND | No | No | [187] |
| Disulfide/benzyl lipoate | Yes | MIC 16 to 32 µg/mL | E. coli (32 to >256) P. aeruginosa (32 to >256) | <125 to >2000 | ND | No | [188] |
| Co-beta-peptides | Yes | Inhibition zone | E. coli (16 to 32) P. aeruginosa (16 to 32) S. aureus (16 to 128) MRSA (16 to 128) | 156 to 5000 | Yes Disruptive at MIC | Yes | [189] |
| Poly(HEAAm-co-SAAP-148) | Yes | Contact-Kill | Inhibition zone: E. coli P. aeruginosa S. aureus | ND | ND | No | [190] |
| Hydrogel | ND | Contact-Kill | Contact-Kill: E. coli K. pneumoniae P. aeruginosa S. aureus MRSA | ND | Yes | ND | [191] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Cardoso Domingues, B.; Maresca, M.; Bolla, J.-M.; Sinou, V. Membrane-Focused Strategies Against Acinetobacter baumannii: The Therapeutic Potential of Functional Copolymers. Antibiotics 2026, 15, 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15040408
Cardoso Domingues B, Maresca M, Bolla J-M, Sinou V. Membrane-Focused Strategies Against Acinetobacter baumannii: The Therapeutic Potential of Functional Copolymers. Antibiotics. 2026; 15(4):408. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15040408
Chicago/Turabian StyleCardoso Domingues, Barbara, Marc Maresca, Jean-Michel Bolla, and Véronique Sinou. 2026. "Membrane-Focused Strategies Against Acinetobacter baumannii: The Therapeutic Potential of Functional Copolymers" Antibiotics 15, no. 4: 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15040408
APA StyleCardoso Domingues, B., Maresca, M., Bolla, J.-M., & Sinou, V. (2026). Membrane-Focused Strategies Against Acinetobacter baumannii: The Therapeutic Potential of Functional Copolymers. Antibiotics, 15(4), 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15040408

