Previous Issue
Volume 2, June
 
 

Intell. Infrastruct. Constr., Volume 2, Issue 3 (September 2026) – 3 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 686 KB  
Systematic Review
Deep Learning Applications for Leak Detection and Localisation in Water Distribution Systems: A Systematic Literature Review
by Chiamba Ricardo Chiteculo Canivete, Mercy Chitauro, Martina Flörke and Maduako E. Okorie
Intell. Infrastruct. Constr. 2026, 2(3), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/iic2030010 - 16 Jul 2026
Viewed by 519
Abstract
Non-Revenue Water (NRW) from leakage represents a major global economic and environmental challenge for urban utilities. While Deep Learning (DL) offers transformative potential for leak detection in Water Distribution Systems (WDSs) and existing reviews provide critical assessments, a consolidated, quantitative evaluation of real-world [...] Read more.
Non-Revenue Water (NRW) from leakage represents a major global economic and environmental challenge for urban utilities. While Deep Learning (DL) offers transformative potential for leak detection in Water Distribution Systems (WDSs) and existing reviews provide critical assessments, a consolidated, quantitative evaluation of real-world applicability and performance consistency that is actionable for engineering practice remains absent. This systematic review critically evaluates DL applications for WDS leak detection and localisation, with a focused analysis of model accuracy in relation to data types, methodological rigour, and the validation gap between controlled experiments and operational deployment. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework, a systematic literature search was performed using Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Taylor & Francis, and MDPI databases for publications spanning the period from 2015 to 2025. From an initial 5265 records, 72 studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis. Analysis revealed a specialisation of DL architectures by data modality: Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) applied to acoustic or vibration data yield the highest reported accuracy for direct leak identification; Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Transformer models are predominant for temporal hydraulic data (pressure and flow); and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) excel with topological data for state estimation. While reported accuracy is often high, performance is highly contingent on data quality and pre-processing. A significant disparity exists between results on synthetic versus real-world validation datasets, ranging from a decline of approximately 3 to 30 percentage points, with reported real-world accuracy spanning 70 to 79.7 percent. Moreover, DL demonstrates a paradigm shift in technical capability for leak management. However, transitioning to reliable field applications requires overcoming key challenges: standardising benchmarks and performance reporting, improving model generalisability and explainability, and fostering integration within practical Digital Twin (DT) frameworks to enable proactive infrastructure management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

1 pages, 138 KB  
Correction
Correction: Ma et al. Intelligent Optimal Strategy for Balancing Safety–Quality–Efficiency–Cost in Massive Concrete Construction. Intell. Infrastruct. Constr. 2025, 1, 2
by Rui Ma, Fengqiang Zhang, Qingbin Li, Yu Hu, Zhaolin Liu, Yaosheng Tan and Qinglong Zhang
Intell. Infrastruct. Constr. 2026, 2(3), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/iic2030009 - 2 Jul 2026
Viewed by 179
Abstract
In the original publication [...] Full article
33 pages, 4951 KB  
Article
An Agentic AI and LLM-Based Framework for Probabilistic Cost Estimation from Fragmented BIM Data
by Liupengfei Wu, Qian Zhang, Ruiying Xu, Yiran Zhang, Frank Ato Ghansah and Xichen Chen
Intell. Infrastruct. Constr. 2026, 2(3), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/iic2030008 - 28 Jun 2026
Viewed by 868
Abstract
Building Information Modelling (BIM) has digitized construction, yet automated cost estimation still suffers from fragmented data and deterministic forecasts that ignore uncertainty. To address this gap, this study introduces a novel framework integrating agentic artificial intelligence (AI) with large language models (LLMs) to [...] Read more.
Building Information Modelling (BIM) has digitized construction, yet automated cost estimation still suffers from fragmented data and deterministic forecasts that ignore uncertainty. To address this gap, this study introduces a novel framework integrating agentic artificial intelligence (AI) with large language models (LLMs) to enable probabilistic cost estimation from disparate BIM data. The system employs four specialized collaborative agents operating via a shared memory module centered on an LLM with natural language understanding, code generation, and chain-of-thought reasoning. A prototype using GPT-4 Turbo, AutoGen, and Monte Carlo simulation was tested on three real-world structures. Compared to three baselines, the framework reduced processing time (4.2 vs. 18.5–68.0 min), manual interventions (0.8 vs. 9–14), and improved entity resolution accuracy (86.5% vs. 46–62%) with well-calibrated probabilistic forecasts, achieving 86.0% empirical coverage for nominal 90% prediction intervals (Prediction Interval Coverage Probability [PICP] = 86.0%, Prediction Interval Width [PIW] = 0.28; p < 0.01). Qualitative analysis confirmed effective semantic conflict resolution and actionable risk visualization via tornado diagrams. The framework tackles long-standing BIM estimation challenges by delivering probabilistic, transparent outputs. Future work includes digital twin integration, open-source LLM deployment, and during-construction forecasting. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop