Previous Issue
Volume 3, March
 
 
Due to scheduled maintenance work on our servers, there may be short service disruptions on this website between 11:00 and 12:00 CEST on March 28th.

LabMed, Volume 3, Issue 2 (June 2026) – 2 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 559 KB  
Review
Paradigm Shifts in Diabetes Management: Key Highlights from the 2026 American Diabetes Association Standards of Care in Diabetes
by Dipti Tiwari, Wann Jia Loh and Tar Choon Aw
LabMed 2026, 3(2), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/labmed3020010 - 27 Mar 2026
Abstract
The ADA 2026 Standards of Care in Diabetes introduces pivotal updates that refine diagnostic and therapeutic workflows. Expanding upon the 2025 guidelines, the 2026 edition broadens continuous-glucose-monitoring (CGM) eligibility to include all individuals on insulin or non-insulin therapies where CGM aids management. Significant [...] Read more.
The ADA 2026 Standards of Care in Diabetes introduces pivotal updates that refine diagnostic and therapeutic workflows. Expanding upon the 2025 guidelines, the 2026 edition broadens continuous-glucose-monitoring (CGM) eligibility to include all individuals on insulin or non-insulin therapies where CGM aids management. Significant new guidance addresses hyperglycemia management in oncology, identifying metformin as the preferred first-line intervention for drug-induced glycemic excursions. Additionally, type 1-diabetes (T1D) risk stratification is refined; a confirmed single IA-2 autoantibody now warrants monitoring levels similar to the Stage 2 disease. Furthermore, prerequisites for automated-insulin-delivery (AID) initiation have been removed to streamline technology access. For laboratory professionals, these revisions emphasize the critical role of advanced glycemic metrics and precise autoantibody profiling in complex clinical contexts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 455 KB  
Review
Monocyte Distribution Width as a Biomarker of Sepsis
by Ioanna Kotsiri, Dimitrios Theodoridis, Angeliki Tsifi and Emmanouil Magiorkinis
LabMed 2026, 3(2), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/labmed3020009 - 24 Mar 2026
Viewed by 117
Abstract
Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome caused by dysregulated host response to infection and remains a major global health challenge with high healthcare burden. Early recognition is critical for improving outcomes, yet current diagnostic tools and conventional biomarkers such as C-reactive protein and procalcitonin [...] Read more.
Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome caused by dysregulated host response to infection and remains a major global health challenge with high healthcare burden. Early recognition is critical for improving outcomes, yet current diagnostic tools and conventional biomarkers such as C-reactive protein and procalcitonin have important limitations related to kinetics, specificity, and cost. This review examines Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW), a novel hematologic parameter derived from routine complete blood count analysis, as an emerging biomarker for early sepsis detection and prognostic assessment. MDW reflects monocyte morphological heterogeneity associated with innate immune activation and rises early in the inflammatory cascade, often at the time of initial clinical presentation. Evidence from emergency department and intensive care unit studies demonstrates that MDW provides high sensitivity and negative predictive value for early sepsis screening and performs comparably to or better than established biomarkers, particularly when integrated with clinical scoring systems and other laboratory indices. Beyond diagnosis, elevated MDW correlates with disease severity, organ dysfunction, and adverse outcomes, suggesting prognostic utility. Although promising, current evidence is limited by heterogeneity and the need for standardized cut-off values and multicenter validation. Overall, MDW represents a rapid, cost-effective adjunct that may enhance multimodal sepsis assessment and clinical decision-making. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rapid Diagnostic Methods for Infectious Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop