Next Article in Journal
Crimean–Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Outbreak in Oman: Currently Emerging Situation and Mitigation Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Clostridioides difficile Infection in Tuberculosis Patients: An Underrecognized Complication of Antituberculous Therapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Status of Physiotherapy Practices Following Total Knee Replacement in Oman: Adherence to Guidelines and Identification of Barriers

by
Aisha Al Hasani
*,
Ahmed Ibrahim Al Kharusi
and
Narasimman Swaminathan
School of Rehabilitation and Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Nizwa University, Nizwa 611, Oman
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Oman Med. Assoc. 2026, 3(2), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/joma3020012
Submission received: 26 September 2025 / Revised: 15 February 2026 / Accepted: 6 July 2026 / Published: 21 July 2026

Abstract

Background: The rising incidence of knee osteoarthritis in Oman has increased the demand for total knee replacement (TKR) surgeries, highlighting the critical role of evidence-based postoperative physiotherapy. However, no prior study has systematically assessed physiotherapy practices post-TKR in Oman. This study aimed to fill this gap by assessing current physiotherapy practices post-TKR in Oman, evaluating adherence to international guidelines, and identifying barriers to optimal care. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between January and March 2025 using a self-administered, structured questionnaire distributed to 189 physiotherapists in governmental hospitals. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with SPSS version 26. Results: High adoption rates were found for preoperative education (94.2%) and strengthening exercises (95.3%). In acute-stage rehabilitation, functional training (96.35%) and early mobilization (94.27%) were prevalent. However, utilization of standardized outcome measures (e.g., WOMAC) was low (74.47%) and variability existed in discharge criteria. Major barriers included a shortage of physiotherapists (91.66% agreement), limited resources (92.18%), and patient-related challenges (94.79%). Conclusion: While foundational rehabilitation practices are implemented effectively in Oman, significant gaps remain in standardized assessments and adherence to specific international protocols. Addressing workforce shortages, resource limitations, and implementing unified national guidelines are essential for optimizing post-TKR rehabilitation outcomes.

1. Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the leading causes of pain, disability, and reduced quality of life worldwide, with the knee joint being most commonly affected due to aging, obesity, and reduced physical activity [1,2]. Globally, the prevalence of knee osteoarthritis has increased substantially over recent decades, contributing to a growing demand for surgical interventions such as total knee replacement (TKR) [1]. Total knee replacement is widely recognized as an effective procedure for relieving pain, correcting gait abnormalities, and improving functional capacity in patients with end-stage knee OA [3]. However, postoperative outcomes are strongly influenced by the quality and consistency of rehabilitation provided following surgery [4].
International clinical guidelines, including those from the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, emphasize the importance of evidence-based physiotherapy interventions following TKR [5]. These guidelines typically outline structured rehabilitation phases, including early mobilization, range-of-motion exercises, strengthening, functional training, and the use of standardized outcome measures to monitor recovery [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Despite the availability of such guidelines, substantial variability in post-TKR physiotherapy practices has been reported across countries, particularly in low- and middle-income settings where resource availability, staffing levels, and institutional policies may differ [10].
In the Middle East, the burden of knee osteoarthritis has increased markedly between 1990 and 2019, reflecting global epidemiological trends [2]. Oman has similarly experienced a rise in TKR procedures, with the number of surgeries increasing from 133 cases in 2020 to 533 cases in 2022, according to the Ministry of Health Annual Health Report [11]. This growing surgical demand places increased responsibility on physiotherapists to deliver effective postoperative rehabilitation and ensure optimal patient outcomes [12].
In Oman, a total of ten hospitals currently provide orthopedic surgical services, including total knee replacement procedures [13]. After undergoing TKR, patients are commonly recommended for postoperative rehabilitation. Physiotherapists are essential in managing pain, joint stiffness, muscle weakness, functional limitations, and gait abnormalities through personalized rehabilitation programs [12,13]. Long-term rehabilitation goals focus on restoring independence, enhancing functional mobility, and improving quality of life [6,13].
Despite ongoing efforts by the Ministry of Health to strengthen healthcare quality and accessibility in alignment with Oman Vision 2050 [11], several system-level and patient-related barriers continue to influence the delivery of physiotherapy services following TKR. These barriers include workforce shortages, variability in clinical expertise, infrastructure limitations, and challenges related to patient adherence and cultural factors [14,15,16]. Understanding these contextual factors is essential for improving the consistency and effectiveness of post-TKR rehabilitation services [12].
Therefore, this study aimed to assess current physiotherapy practices following total knee replacement in Oman, evaluate adherence to international rehabilitation guidelines, and identify barriers influencing optimal service delivery. It was hypothesized that physiotherapy practices in Oman would demonstrate partial adherence to international guidelines, with variability influenced by institutional, workforce, and patient-related factors.

2. Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted between January and March 2025 to evaluate physiotherapy practices following total knee replacement (TKR) in governmental hospitals in Oman. The study targeted physiotherapists involved in musculoskeletal rehabilitation, specifically those with experience managing patients after TKR surgery. Physiotherapists without prior experience in TKR rehabilitation were excluded.
Ethical approval was obtained from the Research Committee of the College of Health Sciences at Nizwa University and the Health Studies and Research Approval Committee of the Ministry of Health, Sultanate of Oman. All participants received an information sheet explaining the study objectives and provided informed consent prior to participation. Confidentiality was ensured through anonymized data collection and secure data storage.
A convenience sampling method was used. Based on the total number of physiotherapists working in governmental hospitals in Oman, a sample size of 189 participants was considered adequate, assuming a 95% confidence level and a 5% margin of error. A total of 194 physiotherapists completed the questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 98%.
Data were collected using a self-administered structured questionnaire developed specifically for this study based on international clinical guidelines and previously published literature on physiotherapy management following total knee replacement. The questionnaire consisted of Likert-scale and multiple-choice questions divided into five sections:
  • Demographic characteristics;
  • Preoperative physiotherapy practices;
  • Postoperative rehabilitation practices;
  • Discharge criteria and outcome measures, and;
  • Perceived barriers to optimal TKR rehabilitation.
Sample questionnaire items included statements such as: “Early mobilization within 24 h is recommended for TKR patients,” “Patient-centered outcome measures such as the WOMAC scale are routinely used in clinical practice,” and “Shortage of physiotherapists limits effective TKR rehabilitation.” (Annexure 1).
Content validity was assessed through review by an experienced research advisor to ensure relevance, clarity, and alignment with study objectives. A pilot study involving six senior physiotherapists was conducted to evaluate clarity, wording, and comprehensibility of the questionnaire items. Feedback from the pilot phase was used to refine the questionnaire prior to full-scale data collection. As the questionnaire was developed for the purpose of this study, formal psychometric testing, including internal consistency analysis, was not performed.
The final questionnaire was distributed in English using institutional email platforms. Participants were given adequate time to complete the questionnaire, and two reminder emails were sent to enhance the response rate. Participation was voluntary, and anonymity was maintained throughout the study.

3. Data Analysis

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 26. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, and means, were used to summarize demographic variables and responses to Likert-scale items. The results were presented to describe current physiotherapy practices, discharge criteria, outcome measure usage, and perceived barriers to post-TKR rehabilitation in Oman.

4. Results

4.1. Demographic Characteristics:

The demographic profile of the study participants (N = 192) is summarized in Table 1. The majority were female (62.5%, n = 120) and held a Diploma as their highest qualification (62.5%, n = 120). A significant proportion had over 16 years of experience in musculoskeletal rehabilitation (38.5%, n = 74), and the largest group practiced in the Muscat governorate (43.8%, n = 84).

4.2. Preoperative and Postoperative Practices

A high majority of respondents reported providing preoperative education (94.8%, n = 182) and prescribing preoperative strengthening exercises (95.3%, n = 183) (Table 2). In the acute postoperative phase, early mobilization within 24 h was widely recommended (94.27%, n = 181 agreed/strongly agreed) and functional training to improve daily activities was highly prevalent (96.35%, n = 185 agreed/strongly agreed) (Figure 1).

4.3. Discharge Criteria and Recommendations

Functional status and mobility were the most strongly agreed-upon discharge criteria (94.79%, n = 182 agreed/strongly agreed). A significant majority also endorsed prescribing exercise prior to discharge (94.27%, n = 181 agreed/strongly agreed) (Table 3). There was strong support for a one-on-one therapist-patient ratio (91.66%, n = 176 agreed/strongly agreed) and for the use of tele-rehabilitation (94.79%, n = 182 agreed/strongly agreed) (Table 4). These findings are illustrated in Figure 2 and Figure 3. (Table 4 and Table 5).

4.4. Use of Outcome Measures

The use of objective measures like goniometers and TUG tests was high (88.02%, n = 169 agreed/strongly agreed). However, the utilization of patient-centered tools like the WOMAC scale was moderate (74.47%, n = 143 agreed/strongly agreed). Regular reassessments were highly favored (92.70%, n = 178 agreed/strongly agreed) (Table 5).

4.5. Perceived Barriers

The most significant barriers identified were a shortage of physiotherapists (91.66%, n = 176 agreed/strongly agreed), lack of infrastructure (92.18%, n = 177 agreed/strongly agreed), and patient-related factors (94.79%, n = 182 agreed/strongly agreed), including lack of exercise adherence (93.22%, n = 179 agreed/strongly agreed) (Figure 4).

5. Discussion

This study assessed physiotherapy practices in Oman following total knee replacement (TKR) to identify potential gaps or barriers affecting the quality of care. The findings offer insights into rehabilitation practices post-TKR among physiotherapists in various healthcare settings. To our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically evaluate these practices in Oman. Most respondents emphasized the crucial role of pre-operative physiotherapy in preparing patients for surgery and improving post-operative outcomes. The high adoption rates of preoperative education (94.2%favorable) and strengthening exercises (95.3% favorable) align with global studies linking preoperative interventions to improved surgical outcomes [17]. For example, Khan reported a 25% increase in postoperative mobility due to preoperative quadriceps training, highlighting the importance of preoperative exercises [18]. However, the relatively lower adoption of pre-TKR flexibility training (91.6% favorable) may indicate inconsistent prioritization of joint mobility, a concern also observed in Jordan [19].
In acute-stage rehabilitation, the favorable responses for functional training (96.35%) and early mobilization (94.27%) reflect evidence-based practices [20]. Early ambulation has been shown to reduce complications like deep vein thrombosis [21], while functional training aligns with ERAS protocols endorsed by orthopedic guidelines [22]. However, the moderate use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) (83.33% favorable) contrasts with other regional settings reporting alternative modalities [23].
The partial avoidance of continuous passive motion (CPM) devices (88.54% favorable) is inconsistent with current practice trends, as the evidence for long-term benefits of CPM is limited [24]. This lingering usage may be compared to specific clinical protocols investigated in Turkey where rigid standardizations are strictly implemented [7,24].
Furthermore, the low favorable rate for digital rehabilitation (79.16%) may be due to infrastructural barriers such as limited internet access in rural areas, hindering the adoption of telehealth [25,26]. Challenges in digital adoption were also analyzed in regional digital health reviews across the Indian subcontinent and Gulf territories, where systematic physician training significantly influences technology uptake [27]. In contrast, unified digital platforms highlighted in the Ministry of Health Annual Health Report offer a potential system framework for Oman to expand digital connectivity [28].
In discharge criteria and post-discharge care, the slightly lower adherence to range of motion (ROM) thresholds (90.10% favorable for 0–100° flexion) suggests variability in applying numerical benchmarks, a clinical phenomenon explored in contemporary mobility trials [29]. This indicates Oman’s preference for holistic evaluation, balancing quantitative goals with clinical judgment—a strategy validated in resource-constrained settings [30]. The post-discharge care strengths in home exercise programs (94.27% favorable) align with structured home interventions reducing 30-day readmissions [31].
The study also revealed low utilization of standardized assessment tools like WOMAC (74.47% favorable), hindering accurate monitoring of patient progress and treatment effectiveness, which remains a key area of improvement in clinical trial protocols [32]. Goniometers and timed up and go (TUG) tests showed high approval rates (88.02%), reflecting their validation role in post-TKR rehabilitation [33,34]. Moreover, functional assessment (sit to stand) and gait evaluation received strong support, as sit-to-stand (STS) exercises are associated with quadriceps strength recovery and readiness for discharge [35]. The lower limb functional scale is also recognized as more effective in specific patient populations [36]. Furthermore, routine reassessment received high favorability (92.70%), aligning with reports indicating optimized clinical tracking with regular evaluations [37].
Physiotherapy practice in Oman follows various guidelines, with some practitioners relying on individual clinical experiences to address specific patient needs, potentially leading to an unstandardized approach and greater variability in recovery outcomes [38]. Some physical therapists managing patients without strict protocols may impact the quality of care, suggesting that expanding tele-rehabilitation models and training community health workers can help alleviate workforce gaps [39]. Moreover, the findings should be interpreted with caution, as the use of a non-standardized questionnaire may influence the generalizability of the results [40].
Regarding regional context and system barriers, the local healthcare dynamics provide crucial context. In Oman, a total of ten hospitals currently provide orthopedic surgical services, including total knee replacement procedures, where physiotherapists face unique challenges related to equipment availability in rural Omani clinics, staffing shortages, and cultural or linguistic barriers [11,15]. For instance, rural facilities face high therapist-patient ratios compared to urban centers, as noted in Oman’s Vision 2050 progress reports [11]. These patient-related and cultural challenges mean that a notable proportion of patients miss sessions due to psychological and access barriers [15].

6. Limitation

However, this study has limitations. The participant group may not fully represent the broader population, particularly individuals in rural areas and the private sector. The cross-sectional methodology only provides a snapshot in time, restricting long-term trend analysis. The questionnaire mainly included structured, Likert-scale, closed-ended questions, which limit qualitative exploration. Future research should consider a mixed-methods approach to combine qualitative depth with longitudinal analysis of rehabilitation outcomes and compare physiotherapy practices post-total knee replacement in government and private sectors.
Furthermore, the questionnaire used in this study was developed specifically for this research and was not a previously standardized instrument; therefore, formal psychometric testing was not conducted.

7. Conclusions

This study examines physiotherapy practices for total knee replacement (TKR) patients in Oman, emphasizing the significance of pre- and post-operative rehabilitation. Despite the common adherence to early mobilization protocols and general rehabilitation guidelines, there is a gap in the utilization of standardized assessment tools, particularly in the pre-operative phase. Discharge criteria and outcome measures also show variability. Systemic challenges such as the lack of national guidelines, high patient volumes, and limited resources affect service quality. To improve professional consistency in TKR rehabilitation and patient outcomes, implementing standardized clinical frameworks, allocating resources effectively, and collaborating on policy reforms are crucial.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.H., N.S. and A.I.A.K.; methodology, A.A.H. and N.S.; software, A.A.H.; validation, A.A.H. and N.S.; formal analysis, A.A.H.; investigation, A.A.H.; resources, A.I.A.K. and N.S.; data curation, A.A.H.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.H.; writing—review and editing, A.I.A.K. and N.S.; visualization, A.A.H.; supervision, N.S. and A.I.A.K.; project administration, A.A.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of College of Health Sciences, Nizwa University [CHS/F/20/2024-25] and date of approval: [13 November 2024].

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cui, A.; Li, H.; Wang, D.; Zhong, J.; Chen, Y.; Lu, H. Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies. EClinicalMedicine 2020, 29–30, 100587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  2. Shamekh, A.; Alizadeh, M.; Nejadghaderi, S.A.; Sullman, M.J.M.; Kaufman, J.S.; Collins, G.S.; Kolahi, A.-A.; Safiri, S. The burden of osteoarthritis in the Middle East and North Africa region from 1990 to 2019. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 881391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Arslan, H.M.; Riaz, S.; Ashraf, A.; Hashmi, Z.; Khan, R.R.; Rashid, S. Effectiveness of Structured Rehabilitation Program on Pain and Function in Patients with Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pak. J. Med. Health Sci. 2022, 16, 1376–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Zhao, B.; Liu, H.; Du, K.; Zhou, W.; Li, Y. Effectiveness and safety of outpatient rehabilitation versus home-based rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2023, 18, 704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. Jette, D.U.; Hunter, S.J.; Burkett, L.; Langham, B.; Logerstedt, D.S.; Piuzzi, N.S.; Poirier, N.M.; Radach, L.J.L.; Ritter, J.E.; Scalzitti, D.A.; et al. Physical Therapist Management of Total Knee Arthroplasty. Phys. Ther. 2020, 100, 1603–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  6. Dutta, S.; Ambade, R.; Wankhade, D.; Agrawal, P. Rehabilitation Techniques Before and After Total Knee Arthroplasty for a Better Quality of Life. Cureus 2024, 16, e54877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  7. Eymir, M.; Erduran, M.; Ünver, B. Active heel-slide exercise therapy facilitates the functional and proprioceptive enhancement following total knee arthroplasty compared to continuous passive motion. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2021, 29, 3352–3360. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Hegde, V.; Stambough, J.B.; Levine, B.R.; Springer, B.D. Highlights of the 2022 American Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report. Arthroplast. Today 2023, 21, 101137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  9. Hsu, H.; Siwiec, R.M. Knee Arthroplasty. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  10. Konnyu, K.J.; Thoma, L.M.; Cao, W.; Aaron, R.K.; Panagiotou, O.A.; Bhuma, M.R.; Adam, G.P.; Balk, E.M.; Pinto, D. Rehabilitation for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2023, 102, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Ministry of Health; Sultanate of Oman. Annual Health Report 2022; Directorate General of Planning and Studies: Muscat, Oman, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  12. Prinsloo, R.-M.; Keller, M.M. Physiotherapy in an advanced rehabilitation pathway for patients after hip and knee arthroplasty: A proposal. S. Afr. J. Physiother. 2021, 77, 1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Trăistaru, M.R.; Kamal, D.; Kamal, C.K.; Dragoş, O.A.; Mirela, R. Complex rehabilitation in patients with knee arthroplasty. Health Sports Rehabil. Med. 2020, 21, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Yelton, M.J.; Jildeh, T.R. Cultural Competence and the Postoperative Experience: Pain Control and Rehabilitation. Arthrosc. Sports Med. Rehabil. 2023, 5, 100733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  15. Al-Badi, A.; Al Balushi, T.; Ali, S. Prevalence of Disability in Oman: Statistics and Challenges. Can. J. Appl. Sci. 2011, 1, 81–96. [Google Scholar]
  16. Raghavan, R. Oman Health: Osteoarthritis in the knee. Times of Oman, 13 August 2016. [CrossRef]
  17. Omar, I.; Kunutsor, S.K.; Bertram, W.; Moore, A.J.; Blom, A.W.; Lenguerrand, E.; Whitehouse, M.R.; Wylde, V. Rehabilitation for revision total knee replacement: Survey of current service provision and systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2023, 24, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  18. Minick, K.I.; Hunter, S.J.; Capin, J.J.; Stevens-Lapsley, J.E.; Snow, G.L.; Woodfield, D.; Dibblee, P.; Brennan, G.P. Improved Outcomes Following a Care Guideline Implementation: Part 1 of an Analysis of 12 355 Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2023, 53, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  19. Alrawashdeh, W.; Eschweiler, J.; Migliorini, F.; El Mansy, Y.; Tingart, M.; Rath, B. Effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty rehabilitation programs: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Rehabil. Med. 2021, 53, jrm00200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  20. An, J.; Ryu, H.-K.; Lyu, S.-J.; Yi, H.-J.; Lee, B.-H. Effects of Preoperative Telerehabilitation on Muscle Strength, Range of Motion, and Functional Outcomes in Candidates for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  21. Barker, K.L.; Room, J.; Knight, R.; Dutton, S.; Toye, F.; Leal, J.; Kenealy, N.; Maia Schlüssel, M.; Collins, G.; Beard, D.; et al. Home-based rehabilitation program compared with traditional physiotherapy for patients at risk of poor outcome after knee arthroplasty: The CORKA randomized controlled trial. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e052598. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Dávila, I.M.; Recai, T.M.; Abraham, M.M.; Etcheson, J.I.; Mohamed, N.S.; Edalatpour, A.; Delanois, R.E. Rehabilitation protocols following total knee arthroplasty: A review of study designs and outcome measures. Ann. Transl. Med. 2019, 7, S255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Prinsloo, R.-M.; Keller, M. Same-day discharge after early mobilization and increased frequency of physiotherapy following hip and knee arthroplasty. S. Afr. J. Physiother. 2022, 78, 1755. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Clinical practice guideline for surgical management of osteoarthritis of the knee. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2020, 28, e912–e925. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jang, S.; Lee, K.; Ju, J.H. Recent Updates on Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  26. Quesnot, A.; Mouchel, S.; Salah, S.B.; Baranes, I.; Martinez, L.; Billuart, F. Randomized controlled trial of compressive cryotherapy versus standard cryotherapy after total knee arthroplasty: Pain, swelling, range of motion and functional recovery. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2024, 25, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  27. Raje, S.; Shetty, A.G.; Shetty, S.; Bhuptani, B.; Arun Maiya, G. Application of digital technology in rehabilitation of total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review. J. Orthop. 2024, 54, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Ministry of Health; Sultanate of Oman. Annual Health Report 2023; Directorate General of Planning and Studies: Muscat, Oman, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  29. Iwakiri, K.; Ohta, Y.; Shibata, Y.; Minoda, Y.; Kobayashi, A.; Nakamura, H. Initiating range of motion exercises within 24 hours following total knee arthroplasty affects the reduction of postoperative pain: A randomized controlled trial. Asia-Pac. J. Sports Med. Arthrosc. Rehabil. Technol. 2020, 21, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  30. Kumar, R.; Kaushal, K.; Kaur, S. Role of physiotherapy in post-operative knee stiffness: A literature review. Adesh Univ. J. Med. Sci. Res. 2020, 2, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Lebleu, J.; Pauwels, A.; Anract, P.; Parratte, S.; Van Overschelde, P.; Van Onsem, S. Digital Rehabilitation after Knee Arthroplasty: A Multi-Center Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  32. Sarzaeem, M.M.N.F.; Feiz, D. Feasibility and acceptability of a telerehabilitation intervention on patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in Iran: Randomized controlled trial protocol. Trials 2024, 25, 142. [Google Scholar]
  33. Oatis, C.A.; Johnson, J.K.; DeWan, T.; Donahue, K.; Li, W.; Franklin, P.D. Characteristics of Usual Physical Therapy Post-Total Knee Replacement and Their Associations with Functional Outcomes. Arthritis Care Res. 2019, 71, 1171–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Papalia, R.; Campi, S.; Vorini, F.; Zampogna, B.; Vasta, S.; Papalia, G.; Fossati, C.; Torre, G.; Denaro, V. The Role of Physical Activity and Rehabilitation Following Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the Elderly. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Richter, M.; Trzeciak, T.; Kaczmarek, M. Effect of continuous passive motion on the early recovery outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Int. Orthop. 2022, 46, 549–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  36. Segal, L.; Day, S.E.; Chapman, A.B.; Osborne, R.H. Can we reduce the disease burden from osteoarthritis? Med. J. Aust. 2004, 180, S11–S17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  37. Singh, J.; Yu, S.; Chen, L.; Cleveland, J. Rates of Total Joint Replacement in the United States: Future Projections to 2020–2040 Using the National Inpatient Sample. J. Rheumatol. 2019, 46, 1134–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  38. Vasta, S.; Papalia, R.; Torre, G.; Vorini, F.; Papalia, G.; Zampogna, B.; Fossati, C.; Bravi, M.; Campi, S.; Denaro, V. The Influence of Preoperative Physical Activity on Postoperative Outcomes of Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Surgery in the Elderly: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  39. Bakaa, N.; Chen, L.H.; Carlesso, L.; Richardson, J.; Shanthanna, H.; Macedo, L. Understanding barriers and facilitators of exercise adherence after total knee arthroplasty. Disabil. Rehabil. 2021, 44, 6348–6355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  40. Warwick, H.; George, A.; Howell, C.; Green, C.; Seyler, T.M.; Jiranek, W.A. Immediate Physical Therapy Following Total Joint Arthroplasty: Barriers and Impact on Short-Term Outcomes. Adv. Orthop. 2019, 2019, 6051476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Practice of postoperative physiotherapy care (response in %).
Figure 1. Practice of postoperative physiotherapy care (response in %).
Joma 03 00012 g001
Figure 2. Preferred discharge criteria among physiotherapists (response in %).
Figure 2. Preferred discharge criteria among physiotherapists (response in %).
Joma 03 00012 g002
Figure 3. Recommendations for postoperative rehabilitation delivery (response in %).
Figure 3. Recommendations for postoperative rehabilitation delivery (response in %).
Joma 03 00012 g003
Figure 4. Perceived Challenges for TKR rehabilitation.
Figure 4. Perceived Challenges for TKR rehabilitation.
Joma 03 00012 g004
Table 1. Demographic details of the participants.
Table 1. Demographic details of the participants.
FrequencyPercent
Gender
Female12062.5%
Male7237.5%
Highest qualification
Bachelor6935.9%
Diploma12062.5%
Master21.0%
Others10.5%
Years of experience in musculoskeletal rehabilitation
1 to 63216.7%
11 to 156131.8%
6 to 102513.0%
Above 167438.5%
Governorate of practice
AL Buraimi105.2%
AL Dakhila2312.0%
AL Dhahirah94.7%
Dhofar136.8%
Musandam84.2%
Muscat8443.8%
North Batinah94.7%
North Sharqiah84.2%
South Batinah168.3%
South Sharqiah126.3%
Table 2. Practice of Preoperative Physiotherapy.
Table 2. Practice of Preoperative Physiotherapy.
Strongly
Disagree
DisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly
Agree
n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)
1Provision of preoperative flexibility exercise.8
(4.2%)
2
(1.0%)
5
(2.6%)
115
(59.9%)
62
(32.3%)
2Preoperative patient education 8
(4.2%)
1
(0.5%)
1
(0.5%)
89
(46.4%)
93
(48.4%)
3Preoperative strengthening exercise 7
(3.6%)
1
(0.5%)
1
(0.5%)
93
(48.4%)
90
(46.9%)
Table 3. Discharge criteria preferred.
Table 3. Discharge criteria preferred.
Strongly DisagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly Agree
Functional status and
Mobility
5
(2.6%)
0(0%)5
(2.6%)
139
(72.4%)
43
(22.4%)
Range of motion of the operated knee should be
ranged at least from
(0 to 100)
5
(2.6%)
1
(0.5%)
13
(6.8%)
122
(63.5%)
51
(26.6%)
Full knee extension is
the priority
5
(2.6%)
6
(3.1%)
7
(3.6%)
116
(60.4%)
58
(30.2%)
Prescription of exercise prior to discharge5
(2.6)
2
(1.0%)
4
(2.1%)
119
(62.0%)
62
(32.3%)
Table 4. Recommendations for post-operative care.
Table 4. Recommendations for post-operative care.
Strongly DisagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly Agree
Therapists’ patient ratio (1:1)5
(2.6%)
4
(2.1%)
7
(3.6%)
133
(69.3%)
43
(22.4%)
Group exercise7
(3.6%)
2
(1.0%)
8
(4.2%)
131
(68.2%)
44
(22.9%)
Tele-rehabilitation.5
(2.6%)
1
(0.5%)
4
(2.1%)
128
(66.7%)
54
(28.1%)
Table 5. Use of outcome measures.
Table 5. Use of outcome measures.
Strongly DisagreeDisagreeNeutralAgree to Strongly Agree
Objective measures (goniometer, strength, TUG). TUG = time up-and-go.5
(2.6%)
6
(3.1%)
12
(6.3%)
135
(70.3%)
34
(17.7%)
Functional measurements (sit-to-stand and informal gait assessment are important)5
(2.6%)
5
(2.6%)
19
(9.9%)
121
(63.0%)
42
(21.9%)
Patient-centered tools (e.g., WOMAC scale, lower limb functional scale) for TKR persons. WOMC = Eastern Ontario and McMaster universities.6
(3.1%)
12 (6.3%)31
(16.1%)
112
(58.3%)
31
(16.1%)
Regular reassessments 5
(2.6%)
1
(0.5%)
8
(4.2%)
131
(68.2%)
47
(24.5%)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al Hasani, A.; Al Kharusi, A.I.; Swaminathan, N. Status of Physiotherapy Practices Following Total Knee Replacement in Oman: Adherence to Guidelines and Identification of Barriers. J. Oman Med. Assoc. 2026, 3, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/joma3020012

AMA Style

Al Hasani A, Al Kharusi AI, Swaminathan N. Status of Physiotherapy Practices Following Total Knee Replacement in Oman: Adherence to Guidelines and Identification of Barriers. Journal of the Oman Medical Association. 2026; 3(2):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/joma3020012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al Hasani, Aisha, Ahmed Ibrahim Al Kharusi, and Narasimman Swaminathan. 2026. "Status of Physiotherapy Practices Following Total Knee Replacement in Oman: Adherence to Guidelines and Identification of Barriers" Journal of the Oman Medical Association 3, no. 2: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/joma3020012

APA Style

Al Hasani, A., Al Kharusi, A. I., & Swaminathan, N. (2026). Status of Physiotherapy Practices Following Total Knee Replacement in Oman: Adherence to Guidelines and Identification of Barriers. Journal of the Oman Medical Association, 3(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/joma3020012

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop