Next Article in Journal
A Review of the Latest Updates in Cytogenetic and Molecular Classification and Emerging Approaches in Identifying Abnormalities in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Landscape of Kawasaki Disease: An Update
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cardiovascular Toxicities in Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Lymphoma Using FAERS Database
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Induction of Sustained Remissions Associated with Immune Activation by Idelalisib in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma

1
Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, University Medicine Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075 Goettingen, Germany
2
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medicine Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075 Goettingen, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Lymphatics 2025, 3(3), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/lymphatics3030022
Submission received: 29 June 2025 / Revised: 23 July 2025 / Accepted: 29 July 2025 / Published: 1 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Collection Lymphomas)

Abstract

Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibition has emerged as a therapeutic option against indolent lymphoma, including relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL). While inhibition of active signaling in the lymphoma cell represents the primary mode of action, PI3K inhibition also exerts immunomodulatory effects. Here we have analyzed 17 consecutive advanced treatment line FL patients treated with the delta-selective PI3K inhibitor idelalisib in a retrospective single-center observational study, with a specific focus on response and immune effects. Eleven patients achieved complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) with median response duration of 22 (11–88) months following a median idelalisib exposure of 15 (4–88) months. Disease response persisted in three patients for a median of 37 (21–63) months following cessation of idelalisib without another therapy being initiated. Autoimmune side effects occurred in eight of the eleven patients who responded, compared to none in six patients whose disease did not respond. In conclusion, a time-limited exposure to idelalisib may induce sustained remissions in a portion of patients with recurrent and/or refractory (r/r) FL, suggesting immunomodulatory effects of PI3K inhibition to be involved in the control of the disease.

1. Introduction

While the clinical course of FL is generally indolent, remissions induced by chemotherapy are mostly transient and the long-term outcomes for patients with chemotherapy-refractory disease remain poor. The PI3K signaling pathway is involved in multiple functions of both B- and T-lymphocytes and its aberrant activation contributes to the propagation and expansion of the transformed cells in several lymphoma entities [1,2,3]. Inhibition of the pathway perturbs PI3K-dependent signaling in the tumor cells, showing significant anti-lymphoma cytostatic activity in vitro and in vivo [4], and, based on its clinical activity, the highly selective PI3K delta (δ) inhibitor idelalisib [5] has been approved to treat patients with relapsed FL [6,7].
Autoimmune side effects of PI3Kδ inhibition are common, including hematotoxicity, fever, nausea, diarrhea, fatigue and elevated liver enzymes. Experimental evidence suggests that regulatory T-cells (Tregs) contribute to these immune-related toxicities. Mice with genetic inactivation of p110δ develop autoimmune colitis [8] associated with a reduction in Tregs [9], which has also been demonstrated in the peripheral blood of patients treated with idelalisib [10]. Idelalisib-associated diarrhea was associated with intraepithelial lymphocytosis [11]. In patients with idelalisib related hepatitis, liver biopsies showed infiltrates of activated T-cells. Idelalisib-associated hepatitis typically takes several weeks to develop following first exposure, but rapidly recurs after restarting the therapy, a finding compatible with an adaptive immune response [10]. Most adverse effects are reversible by dose reduction, immunosuppressive drugs such as corticosteroids, or temporary interruption of idelalisib [12].
Starting idelalisib therapy induces a transient surge in blood lymphocyte counts, due to disrupted lymphocyte trafficking [13]. In-depth studies showed that PI3K inhibition causes a reduction in Tregs (CD4 positive) most likely caused by decreased cytokine gene expression and an increase in cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) positive T cells [14]. The reduction in Tregs in the peripheral blood was seen particularly in patients experiencing adverse side effects [10,15,16]. In-vivo mice models showed that PI3Kδ inhibition induced an adaptive anti-tumor immune response through inhibition of an immunosuppressive Treg population, leading to a ‘rebalancing’ of the adaptive immune system from CD4+ T-helper-cells and CD8+ T-cells towards CD8+ T-cells [17,18,19]. The immunologic effects of PI3Kδ inhibition may also apply to cancer, where the association of immunologic side effects and increased overall survival (OS) of patients has already been described for solid tumors and chronic lymphocytic leukemia [20,21].
Here we report our experience with response and response duration in 17 consecutive patients receiving idelalisib salvage therapy against progressive FL, suggesting an association of sustained response and immunological activity in a subset of this cohort.

2. Results

2.1. Study Cohort

The index cohort of 17 patients with FL disease comprised 9 females and 8 males with a median age of 64 (42–78) years at the start of therapy with idelalisib. All patients had received a median of 3.3 prior chemotherapy (Ctx) lines, including chemotherapy related to prior autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT).
Idelalisib treatment induced CR or PR in 11 cases while the disease progressed in 6 patients following 100 days of treatment with idelalisib. Analogous to previous studies the main adverse side effects were gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and haematoxicity. Further side effects were elevation of liver enzymes, alopecia, muscle cramps and skin rashes. During the study 10 patients passed away, 7 caused by progress of their lymphoma. By the end of our observation period idelalisib had already been stopped in the 7 remaining patients due to either progress or side effects while three patients remained in remission.
The median age at the time of commencement of idelalisib was 55 (42–78) years in female and 64 (45–72) years in male patients. The female patients reached an overall survival (OS) after start of idelalisib of 24 (10–96) months, as compared to a significantly shorter OS of 13.5 (3–56) months in male patients. The female cohort showed a progression free survival (PFS) of 13 (2–88) months while the male cohort reached 8.5 (2–56) months.

2.2. Response to Idelalisib

Patients with response to idelalisib showed a longer duration of response duration following prior therapies (24 compared to 11 months) and had received slightly more therapy lines previously (3.5 to 3), including high dose chemotherapy and ASCT (Table 1). There was no difference between responders and non-responders with regard to the initial lymphoma stage at first diagnosis or their ECOG performance status when their diagnosis was first made. As expected, responders showed a significant longer OS [24 (10–96) to 10.5 (3–15) months, p-value: 0.0005)] and PFS [22 (1–88) to 3 (2–7) months, p-value: <0.0001] after start of idelalisib (Figure 1a,b). 72.7% of the responders showed autoimmune side effects, mostly diarrhea, while such side effects did not occur in non-responders. 6 patients had a history of prior autologous and/or allogeneic SCT. Considering responders and non-responders separately by gender we observed 7 responders in the female (77.7% of observed female patients) and 4 in the male cohort (50% of observed male patients). The median age of the responders was younger compared to the non-responders both at the time of first diagnosis and at the introduction of therapy with idelalisib. The median age of female responders was 30 years lower than the median age of female non-responders [46 (34–66) to 74 (74) years] at initial diagnosis and 26.5 years lower at the initiation of idelalisib therapy [50 (42–71) to 76.5 (71–78) years]. The male cohort showed a median age gap of 9.5 years between responders and non-responders [51 (33–66) to 60.5 (56–71) years] at the time of initial diagnosis and a difference of 8.5 years when idelalisib was commenced [58 (45–72) to 64.5 (64–72) years]. The female responders showed an OS of 124 (85–180) months considered from the initial diagnosis and an OS after start of idelalisib of 25 (10–96) months following initiation of idelalisib therapy. In comparison, we observed a shorter OS in the male responders with an OS after initial diagnosis of 73.5 (28–96) months and an OS of 21 (18–56) months following the start of treatment with idelalisib. The female responders showed a median PFS of 22 (7–88) months and the male cohort one of 19.5 (12–56) months. 85.7% of female responders experienced autoimmune side effects while only 50% of male responders suffered such side effects, mainly GI toxicity.

2.3. Role of Autoimmune Side Effects

Considering treatment responses with and without autoimmune side effects we detected a median OS after initial diagnosis of 110 (90–180) months in responders with autoimmune side effects and 57 (28–85) months in responders without such side effects, i.e., a difference of 53 months. Median OS after the start of idelalisib was 29.5 (10–96) months in patients with autoimmune side effects and 12 (3–25) months in the patients without (Figure 1c, p-value: 0.0149). Likewise we detected a longer PFS after start of idelalisib in patients with autoimmune side effects 17.5 (7–88) months in comparison to patients without autoimmune side effects 5 (2–24) months (Figure 1d, p-value: 0.1057). Response following temporary interruption of idelalisib persisted in patients with auto-immune side effects with a median PFS of 3.5 (0–63) months, compared to 0 (0–21) months in responders without autoimmune side effects, suggesting an association of auto-immune effects with response and response duration (Figure 2).
This study was retrospective in nature, thus no specific immune monitoring for idelalisib-mediated immunological effects was planned. However, routine monitoring of CD4/CD8 counts and routine imaging allowed the observations shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. We detected strong expansion of CD8 cells in patient 16 (Figure 4), a 47-year-old female. In her course of treatment idelalisib had to be paused twice due to gastrointestinal side effects. Restarting idelalisib repeatedly elicited expansion of CD3+/CD8+ peripheral lymphocytes (Figure 3).
Equally, in patient 17, idelalisib treatment and response were associated with intestinal side effects (grade 1–3). Idelalisib was applied as a fifth line therapy against FL and PR and CR were achieved at month 3 and 9 respectively. Colonoscopy revealed colitis which responded promptly to corticosteroids. In this female 41-years old patient a thymus rebound was detected 58 months following the initiation of idelalisib therapy (Figure 4), the hyperplastic thymus was PET/CT negative and remained without progression through month 85.

2.4. Long-Term Response

Three patients experienced a continuing response under therapy with idelalisib, all with autoimmune associated GI side effects. Their median age at initial diagnosis was 45 years (41–60). With a median response of 85 (56–88) months we detected a significant difference to the median response of 22 (11–88) months in the entire responder cohort.
Likewise, three patients displayed a long-lasting disease response for a median of 37 months (21–63 months) even after cessation of idelalisib due to side effects. Two of them experienced GI-toxicity, one developed idelalisib associated exanthema and leukocytopenia. Two of them are part of the long-term responder group indicated above.
With the exception of one fatal event due to influenza infection we have not observed treatment-related deaths due to an infectious complications, adhering to standard prophylactic antibiotic recommendations and early intervention in the case of infection.

3. Discussion

PI3K inhibition has evolved as an effective treatment modality against r/r indolent lymphoma, leading to approvals for idelalisib and copanlisib in r/r follicular lymphoma [22,23]. In our retrospective single center cohort with special attention to long-term outcome idelalisib induced complete or partial remissions in 59% of patients, with a duration of response of 22 months (Table 1). It is noteworthy that three patients were still in remission at the latest follow-up at 96 months.
Intraindividual disease control induced by idelalisib persisted longer than the median of response durations induced by prior lines of chemotherapy (Table 1). This contrasts the generally accepted concept of conditional survival in general oncology, describing the shortening of response durations with increasing treatment lines of conventional cytostatic therapy [24]. This may suggest a contribution of indirect effects to the drug`s efficacy in some cases.
Preclinical evidence clearly established the disruption of B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling at the level of PI3K activation as the predominant mode of action of idealisib against B-cell lymphoma cells [6,25]. Systemic PI3K inhibition, however, also affects T-cells and in particular regulatory T-cells (Treg) [17,26,27]. Both in mouse models and in human ex vivo studies PI3K inhibition blocked inhibitory Treg activity, allowing an increased anti-tumor disease activity of effector T-cells [17,27]. Treg inhibition also explains the frequent autoimmune activity observed in clinical PI3K inhibitor trials, including idelalisib [28]. Importantly, recent studies of the T-cell repertoire in chronic lymphatic leucemia (CLL) patients revealed the occurrence of dominant T-cell clones associated with idelalisib treatment and suggested an association of T-cell repertoire shifts with anti-lymphoma effects [29].
Our findings suggest a connection between the response to treatment and immune-related side effects. Such effects were reported in 72.7% of our responders, but in none of the non-responders. Furthermore, responders who experienced auto immune side effects experienced a longer OS following the initiation of idelalisib therapy as compared to responders without autoimmune effects. This shows that immune toxicity may be a surrogate marker of efficacy in this drug class and an early predictor of durable response.
The thymic hyperplasia which we found in one patient with long-term response and autoimmune GI side effects may also hint towards immunomodulatory effects of PI3K inhibition. Thymic hyperplasia is a common phenomenon after Ctx for lymphoma in pediatric patients [30] but rarely occurs in older patients [31]. This is thought to be due to the fact that in adults over the age of 40 the thymus consists of fatty tissue with only low counts of immune cells [32]. Usually rebound can be detected within two years following the begin of chemotherapy [33]. Thymic hyperplasia can then be divided into two subtypes, true hyperplasia and lymphoid hyperplasia, which may be difficult to distinguish on imaging [33,34]. In true hyperplasia, the thymus most commonly appears oval, with a smooth contour, homogeneous and lack of contrast medium enhancement [33]. These features are all present in our case. However, a study on the imaging features of pathologically proven true thymic hyperplasia revealed that such qualitative features did not significantly differ between the subtypes [34]. It concluded, however, that CT attenuation of the thymus was higher in lymphoid than in true hyperplasia. The suggested cutoff value was 41.2 HU, a value not reached in any of the CT studies in our case. In addition, the same study found that SUVmax measurements in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies were below 3.8 in true hyperplasia, again concordant with the reading of 1.5 in our patient.
Although gained retrospectively from a limited number of patients our observations in r/r FL patients support the notion that idelalisib mediated T-cell activation participates in the drug’s anti-lymphoma effect (Figure 2). Admittedly, the precise mechanisms as well as (bio)markers for a prospective identification or monitoring of those patients benefitting remain to be elucidated. Further investigation appears warranted to identify those patients who may benefit most from PI3K inhibitor immune effects.
Therapeutic intervention with PI3K inhibition certainly will have to balance beneficial anti-tumor activity against side effects through auto-immune phenomena or opportunistic infections triggered by PI3K immunomodulatory effects [22]. In a wider perspective and with targeted immunological treatment options emerging [35,36], PI3K mediated Treg inhibition may evolve as a valuable tool in combined immunotherapy approaches. Most promising in perspective, PI3K delta inhibitor therapy appears a candidate to be combined with CAR-T or bi-specific antibody treatments, aiming at enhanced activity by downregulation of suppressive TREGs.

4. Materials and Methods

Data for this retrospective single-center observational study were extracted from medical records following our institution’s ethics review board approval. All patients who had received idelalisib according to EMA approval against advanced progressive FL between February 2015 and March 2023 were included. Disease monitoring adhered to good clinical practice applying the Lugano criteria [37], end point for response evaluation was day 100 following the initiation of treatment. Primarily, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were measured in our patient cohort. OS and PFS were compared between subgroups using Kaplan-Meier curve. Statistical significance was tested with log-rank test. Adverse events as recorded in the patients’ charts were documented with special regard to immune side effects and their appearance in the subgroups.
The majority of patients started with idelalisib at a standard dose of 150 mg twice daily, with dose reductions in the course of treatment according to drug tolerability.

5. Conclusions

Our observations support a judicious use of idelalisib in patients with r/r FL: once the drug induces remission, a chance for lasting benefit emerges, even upon drug cessation. Further studies may show how to integrate PI3K inhibition optimally in lymphoma immunotherapy.

Author Contributions

A.-C.H. collected patient data. A.-C.H. and G.G.W. analyzed the data, discussed the data and drafted the article. J.L. analyzed imaging data. A.-C.H., J.L. and G.G.W. wrote the article. All authors approved the final version and agreed to be accountable for all aspects. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany (Project identification code 28/2/24).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Our data is extracted from medical records, which makes the original data unavailable due to privacy and ethical restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ASCTallogeneic stem cell transplantation
BCRB-cell receptor
CD4cluster of differentiation 4
CD8cluster of differentiation 8
CLLchronic lymphatic leucemia
CRcomplete remission
Ctxchemotherapy
ECOGEastern Cooperative Oncology Group
FLfollicular lymphoma
18F-FDG 18Fluoro-desoxyglocose
GIgastrointestinal
OSoverall survival
PET/CTpositron emission tomography-computed tomography
PFSprogression free survival
PI3KPhosphatidylinositol-3-kinase
PRpartial remission
r/rrecurrent/refractory
SUVmaxmaximum standardized uptake value
Tregsregulatory T-cells

References

  1. Madsen, R.R. Principles of PI3K biology and its role in lymphoma. In Targeting Oncogenic Drivers and Signaling Pathways in Hematologic Malignancies: From Concept to Practice; O’Conner, O.A., Ansell, S.M., Seymour, J.F., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yuan, T.L.; Cantley, L.C. PI3K pathway alterations in cancer: Variations on a theme. Oncogene 2008, 27, 5497–5510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Martini, M.; De Santis, M.C.; Braccini, L.; Gulluni, F.; Hirsch, E. PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and cancer: An updated review. Ann. Med. 2014, 46, 372–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tarantelli, C.; Argnani, L.; Zinzani, P.L.; Bertoni, F. PI3Kδ Inhibitors as Immunomodulatory Agents for the Treatment of Lymphoma Patients. Cancers 2021, 13, 5535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Meadows, S.A.; Vega, F.; Kashishian, A.; Johnson, D.; Diehl, V.; Miller, L.L.; Younes, A.; Lannutti, B.J. PI3Kδ inhibitor, GS-1101 (CAL-101), attenuates pathway signaling, induces apoptosis, and overcomes signals from the microenvironment in cellular models of Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2012, 119, 1897–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gopal, A.; Graf, S. Idelalisib for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2016, 17, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Davies, A. Idelalisib for relapsed/refractory indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: An overview of pharmacokinetics and clinical trial outcomes. Expert Rev. Hematol. 2015, 8, 581–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Okkenhaug, K.; Bilancio, A.; Farjot, G.; Priddle, H.; Sancho, S.; Peskett, E.; Pearce, W.; Meek, S.E.; Salpekar, A.; Waterfield, M.D.; et al. Impaired B and T cell antigen receptor signaling in p110delta PI 3-kinase mutant mice. Science 2002, 297, 1031–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Patton, D.T.; Garden, O.A.; Pearce, W.P.; Clough, L.E.; Monk, C.R.; Leung, E.; Rowan, W.C.; Sancho, S.; Walker, L.S.K.; Vanhaesebroeck, B.; et al. Cutting edge: The phosphoinositide 3-kinase p110 delta is critical for the function of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 6598–6602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lampson, B.L.; Kasar, S.N.; Matos, T.R.; Morgan, E.A.; Rassenti, L.; Davids, M.S.; Fisher, D.C.; Freedman, A.S.; Jacobson, C.A.; Armand, P.; et al. Idelalisib given front-line for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia causes frequent immune-mediated hepatotoxicity. Blood 2016, 128, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Weidner, A.S.; Panarelli, N.C.; Geyer, J.T.; Bhavsar, E.B.; Furman, R.R.; Leonard, J.P.; Jessurun, J.; Yantiss, R.K. Idelalisib-Associated Colitis: Histologic Findings in 14 Patients. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2015, 39, 1661–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cuneo, A.; Barosi, G.; Danesi, R.; Fagiuoli, S.; Ghia, P.; Marzano, A.; Montillo, M.; Poletti, V.; Viale, P.; Zinzani, P.L. Management of adverse events associated with idelalisib treatment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and follicular lymphoma: A multidisciplinary position paper. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 37, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Furman, R.R.; Sharman, J.P.; Coutre, S.E.; Cheson, B.D.; Pagel, J.M.; Hillmen, P.; Barrientos, J.C.; Zelenetz, A.D.; Kipps, T.J.; Flinn, I.; et al. Idelalisib and rituximab in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 997–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gadi, D.; Griffith, A.; Wang, Z.; Tyekucheva, S.; Rai, V.; Fernandes, S.M.; Machado, J.; Munugalavadla, V.; Lederer, J.; Brown, J.R. Idelalisib reduces regulatory T cells and activates T helper 17 cell differentiation in relapsed refractory patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 2022, 197, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Handl, S.; von Heydebrand, F.; Voelkl, S.; Oostendorp, R.A.J.; Wilke, J.; Kremer, A.N.; Mackensen, A.; Lutzny-Geier, G. Immune modulatory effects of Idelalisib in stromal cells of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk. Lymphoma 2021, 62, 2679–2689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chellappa, S.; Kushekhar, K.; Munthe, L.A.; Tjønnfjord, G.E.; Aandahl, E.M.; Okkenhaug, K.; Taskén, K. The PI3K p110δ Isoform Inhibitor Idelalisib Preferentially Inhibits Human Regulatory T Cell Function. J. Immunol. 2019, 202, 1397–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ali, K.; Soond, D.R.; Piñeiro, R.; Hagemann, T.; Pearce, W.; Lim, E.L.; Bouabe, H.; Scudamore, C.L.; Hancox, T.; Maecker, H.; et al. Inactivation of PI(3)K p110δ breaks regulatory T-cell-mediated immune tolerance to cancer. Nature 2014, 510, 407–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abu Eid, R.; Ahmad, S.; Lin, Y.; Webb, M.; Berrong, Z.; Shrimali, R.; Kumai, T.; Ananth, S.; Rodriguez, P.C.; Celis, E.; et al. Enhanced Therapeutic Efficacy and Memory of Tumor-Specific CD8 T Cells by Ex Vivo PI3K-δ Inhibition. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 4135–4145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Preite, S.; Huang, B.; Cannons, J.L.; McGavern, D.B.; Schwartzberg, P.L. PI3K Orchestrates T Follicular Helper Cell Differentiation in a Context Dependent Manner: Implications for Autoimmunity. Front. Immunol. 2019, 9, 3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Das, S.; Johnson, D.B. Immune-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. J. Immunother. Cancer 2019, 7, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wagner-Johnston, N.D.; Sharman, J.; Furman, R.R.; Salles, G.; Brown, J.R.; Robak, T.; Gu, L.; Xing, G.; Chan, R.J.; Rajakumaraswamy, N.; et al. Idelalisib immune-related toxicity is associated with improved treatment response. Leuk. Lymphoma 2021, 62, 2915–2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cheah, C.Y.; Fowler, N.H. Idelalisib in the management of lymphoma. Blood 2016, 128, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gopal, A.K.; Kahl, B.S.; Flowers, C.R.; Martin, P.; Ansell, S.M.; Abella-Dominicis, E.; Koh, B.; Ye, W.; Barr, P.M.; Salles, G.A.; et al. Idelalisib is effective in patients with high-risk follicular lymphoma and early relapse after initial chemoimmunotherapy. Blood 2017, 129, 3037–3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rivas-Delgado, A.; Magnano, L.; Moreno-Velázquez, M.; García, O.; Nadeu, F.; Mozas, P.; Dlouhy, I.; Baumann, T.; Rovira, J.; González-Farre, B.; et al. Response duration and survival shorten after each relapse in patients with follicular lymphoma treated in the rituximab era. Br. J. Haematol. 2019, 184, 753–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yang, Q.; Modi, P.; Newcomb, T.; Quéva, C.; Gandhi, V. Idelalisib: First-in-Class PI3K Delta Inhibitor for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Small Lymphocytic Leukemia, and Follicular Lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 1537–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, C.; Jiang, P.; Wei, S.; Xu, X.; Wang, J. Regulatory T cells in tumor microenvironment: New mechanisms, potential therapeutic strategies and future prospects. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ahmad, S.; Abu-Eid, R.; Shrimali, R.; Webb, M.; Verma, V.; Doroodchi, A.; Berrong, Z.; Samara, R.; Rodriguez, P.C.; Mkrtichyan, M.; et al. Differential PI3Kδ Signaling in CD4+ T-cell Subsets Enables Selective Targeting of T Regulatory Cells to Enhance Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 1892–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lauder, S.N.; Smart, K.; Bart, V.M.T.; Pires, A.; Scott, J.; Milutinovic, S.; Godkin, A.; Vanhaesebroeck, B.; Gallimore, A. Treg-driven tumour control by PI3Kδ inhibition limits myeloid-derived suppressor cell expansion. Br. J. Cancer 2022, 127, 1595–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vardi, A.; Vlachonikola, E.; Papazoglou, D.; Psomopoulos, F.; Kotta, K.; Ioannou, N.; Galigalidou, C.; Gemenetzi, K.; Pasentsis, K.; Kotouza, M.; et al. T-Cell Dynamics in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Under Different Treatment Modalities. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 4958–4969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Franke, F.C.; Damek, A.; Steglich, J.; Kurch, L.; Hasenclever, D.; Georgi, T.W.; Wohlgemuth, W.A.; Mauz-Körholz, C.; Körholz, D.; Kluge, R.; et al. Differentiation between rebound thymic hyperplasia and thymic relapse after chemotherapy in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2023, 70, e30421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kissin, C.M.; Husband, J.E.; Nicholas, D.; Eversman, W. Benign thymic enlargement in adults after chemotherapy: CT demonstration. Radiology 1987, 163, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sun, D.-P.; Jin, H.; Ding, C.-Y.; Liang, J.-H.; Wang, L.; Fan, L.; Wu, Y.-J.; Xu, W.; Li, J.-Y. Thymic hyperplasia after chemotherapy in adults with mature B cell lymphoma and its influence on thymic output and CD4+ T cells repopulation. OncoImmunology 2016, 5, e1137417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nasseri, F.; Eftekhari, F. Clinical and Radiologic Review of the Normal and Abnormal Thymus: Pearls and Pitfalls. RadioGraphics 2010, 30, 413–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Araki, T.; Sholl, L.M.; Gerbaudo, V.H.; Hatabu, H.; Nishino, M. Imaging Characteristics of Pathologically Proven Thymic Hyperplasia: Identifying Features That Can Differentiate True from Lymphoid Hyperplasia. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2014, 202, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nastoupil, L.J.; Neelapu, S.S. Novel immunologic approaches in lymphoma: Unleashing the brakes on the immune system. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 17, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Stock, S.; Übelhart, R.; Schubert, M.-L.; Fan, F.; He, B.; Hoffmann, J.-M.; Wang, L.; Wang, S.; Gong, W.; Neuber, B.; et al. Idelalisib for optimized CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 145, 1312–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cheson, B.D.; Fisher, R.I.; Barrington, S.F.; Cavalli, F.; Schwartz, L.H.; Zucca, E.; Lister, T.A. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: The Lugano classification. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 3059–3068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (ad) Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after start of idelalisib (month 0). Comparison of responders and non-responders (n = 17, a,b) and comparison of patients with and without autoimmune side effects (n = 17, c,d). Two patients in the responder group without autoimmune side effects died without evidence of progressive disease.
Figure 1. (ad) Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after start of idelalisib (month 0). Comparison of responders and non-responders (n = 17, a,b) and comparison of patients with and without autoimmune side effects (n = 17, c,d). Two patients in the responder group without autoimmune side effects died without evidence of progressive disease.
Lymphatics 03 00022 g001
Figure 2. Swimmer plot showing OS and PFS after start of idelalisib in responders and non-responders. Total of 17 patients. Red chart bars show patients with autoimmune side effects, blue bars show patients without autoimmune side effects. Patients 4, 7, 8 and 10–17 were responders without progression at d100 after start of idelalisib. Patient 2 showed evidence of progression at d100, but idelalisib was continued until month 5. Patient 8 passed away for unknown reasons, Patient 12 died due to influenza pneumonia, both without evidence of progressive disease.
Figure 2. Swimmer plot showing OS and PFS after start of idelalisib in responders and non-responders. Total of 17 patients. Red chart bars show patients with autoimmune side effects, blue bars show patients without autoimmune side effects. Patients 4, 7, 8 and 10–17 were responders without progression at d100 after start of idelalisib. Patient 2 showed evidence of progression at d100, but idelalisib was continued until month 5. Patient 8 passed away for unknown reasons, Patient 12 died due to influenza pneumonia, both without evidence of progressive disease.
Lymphatics 03 00022 g002
Figure 3. Peripheral blood lymphocyte expansion associated with idelalisib treatment. Idelalisib was given as a fourth line therapy against FL 3A in a 47-years old female patient (patient 16), blue and red arrows indicating start and stop of idelalisib due to adverse events, i.e., liver enzyme elevation and diarrhea at week 4 and 8 respectively. Diarrhea recurred at month 29, but was reversible following a short-course of corticosteroids. Idelalisib was finally discontinued at month 36. Further follow-up was event-free. CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte counts revealed strong expansion of total CD3 and, in particular, CD8 positive cells associated with idelalisib treatment.
Figure 3. Peripheral blood lymphocyte expansion associated with idelalisib treatment. Idelalisib was given as a fourth line therapy against FL 3A in a 47-years old female patient (patient 16), blue and red arrows indicating start and stop of idelalisib due to adverse events, i.e., liver enzyme elevation and diarrhea at week 4 and 8 respectively. Diarrhea recurred at month 29, but was reversible following a short-course of corticosteroids. Idelalisib was finally discontinued at month 36. Further follow-up was event-free. CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte counts revealed strong expansion of total CD3 and, in particular, CD8 positive cells associated with idelalisib treatment.
Lymphatics 03 00022 g003
Figure 4. (AD) Thymus rebound associated with idelalisib treatment. Images of thoracic CT (AC) and PET/CT (D) examinations before (A) and after diagnosis of thymic hypertrophy. A enhanced transverse-axial CT section demonstrating thymic involution; (B) enhanced transverse-axial CT section showing a principally non-enhancing, polycyclic, sharply margined and homogenous low soft tissue density mass in the left ventrolateral mediastinum; (C) coronally reformatted CT section confirming the above characteristics; (D) transverse-axial fused PET/CT image displaying lack of 18F-FDG tracer uptake.
Figure 4. (AD) Thymus rebound associated with idelalisib treatment. Images of thoracic CT (AC) and PET/CT (D) examinations before (A) and after diagnosis of thymic hypertrophy. A enhanced transverse-axial CT section demonstrating thymic involution; (B) enhanced transverse-axial CT section showing a principally non-enhancing, polycyclic, sharply margined and homogenous low soft tissue density mass in the left ventrolateral mediastinum; (C) coronally reformatted CT section confirming the above characteristics; (D) transverse-axial fused PET/CT image displaying lack of 18F-FDG tracer uptake.
Lymphatics 03 00022 g004
Table 1. Patient characteristics according to response. Outcome of idelalisib treatment according to response at day 100. OS: overall survival from start of idelalisib, PFS: progression free survival from start of idelalisib; CTX: chemotherapy; HD CTX/ASCT: high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation; PD progressive disease; AE: adverse events; time intervals given in months.
Table 1. Patient characteristics according to response. Outcome of idelalisib treatment according to response at day 100. OS: overall survival from start of idelalisib, PFS: progression free survival from start of idelalisib; CTX: chemotherapy; HD CTX/ASCT: high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation; PD progressive disease; AE: adverse events; time intervals given in months.
ResponderNon-ResponderAll
N11617
Median age at ED (range)46 (33–60)67 (56–74)56 (33–74)
Median age at start idelalisib (range)52 (42–72)68.5 (64–78)64 (42–78)
Gender (f/m)7/42/49/8
FL grading 1,28310
FL grading 3A336
Stage I, II (initial)527
Stage III, IV (initial)6410
Prior lines CTX median (range)3.5 (2–5)3 (1–6)3.35 (1–6)
Prior bendamustin549
Prior HD CTX/ASCT516
Prior response duration, median241119
PD pre idelalisib9615
Elevated LDH pre idelalisib538
Autoimmune AE8/110/68/17
Stop idelalisib11/116/617/17
Treatment duration, w pausing; median (range)15 (4–88)2 (2–7)6 (2–88)
PFS; median, (range)22 (7–88)3 (2–7)12 (2–88)
OS; median, (range)24 (10–96)10.5 (3–15)15 (3–96)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hund, A.-C.; Larsen, J.; Wulf, G.G. Induction of Sustained Remissions Associated with Immune Activation by Idelalisib in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma. Lymphatics 2025, 3, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/lymphatics3030022

AMA Style

Hund A-C, Larsen J, Wulf GG. Induction of Sustained Remissions Associated with Immune Activation by Idelalisib in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma. Lymphatics. 2025; 3(3):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/lymphatics3030022

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hund, Anna-Carina, Jörg Larsen, and Gerald G. Wulf. 2025. "Induction of Sustained Remissions Associated with Immune Activation by Idelalisib in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma" Lymphatics 3, no. 3: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/lymphatics3030022

APA Style

Hund, A.-C., Larsen, J., & Wulf, G. G. (2025). Induction of Sustained Remissions Associated with Immune Activation by Idelalisib in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma. Lymphatics, 3(3), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/lymphatics3030022

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop