Previous Issue
Volume 3, June
 
 

Receptors, Volume 3, Issue 3 (September 2024) – 6 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 974 KiB  
Review
Protein SUMOylation and Its Functional Role in Nuclear Receptor Control
by Nele Wild, Charlotte Sophia Kaiser, Gerhard Wunderlich, Eva Liebau and Carsten Wrenger
Receptors 2024, 3(3), 408-424; https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors3030020 - 3 Sep 2024
Viewed by 507
Abstract
Post-translational protein modifications (PTMs) significantly enhance the functional diversity of proteins and are therefore important for the expansion and the dynamics of the cell’s proteome. In addition to structurally simpler PTMs, substrates also undergo modification through the reversible attachment of small proteins. The [...] Read more.
Post-translational protein modifications (PTMs) significantly enhance the functional diversity of proteins and are therefore important for the expansion and the dynamics of the cell’s proteome. In addition to structurally simpler PTMs, substrates also undergo modification through the reversible attachment of small proteins. The best understood PTM of this nature to date is the covalent conjugation of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins (UBLs) to their substrates. The protein family of small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) is one of these UBLs that has received increasing scientific attention. The pathway of SUMOylation is highly conserved in all eukaryotic cells and is crucial for their survival. It plays an essential role in many biological processes, such as the maintenance of genomic integrity, transcriptional regulation, gene expression, and the regulation of intracellular signal transduction, and thereby influences DNA damage repair, immune responses, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis. Several studies have already shown that in this context protein SUMOylation is involved in the control mechanisms of various cellular receptors. This article unites data from different studies focusing on the investigation of the strictly conserved three-step enzyme cascade of protein SUMOylation and the functional analysis of the involved proteins E1, E2, and E3 and SUMOylation target proteins. Furthermore, this review highlights the role of nuclear receptor SUMOylation and its importance for the cellular functionality and disease development arising from defects in correct protein SUMOylation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 670 KiB  
Review
The Role of the Vitamin D Receptor in the Epidermal Stem Cell Response to Wounding
by Daniel D. Bikle
Receptors 2024, 3(3), 397-407; https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors3030019 - 9 Aug 2024
Viewed by 662
Abstract
Chronic skin wounds are estimated to affect 6.5 million patients in the US, at a cost of over USD 25 billion. Efforts to prevent and/or treat such wounds will result in reduced morbidity and economic losses. This project is focused on the role [...] Read more.
Chronic skin wounds are estimated to affect 6.5 million patients in the US, at a cost of over USD 25 billion. Efforts to prevent and/or treat such wounds will result in reduced morbidity and economic losses. This project is focused on the role of vitamin D signaling in the epidermis in the control of stem cell (SC) activation and function during the initial response to the wounding of the skin, a response that, if defective, contributes to poor wound healing or cancer. In this review, I first describe the anatomy of the skin, focusing first on the epidermis, describing the different cell layers which in a spatial way also represent the differentiation process of the interfollicular epidermis (IFE) as it undergoes continuous regeneration. I then describe the other components of the skin, particularly the hair follicle (HF), which undergoes a cyclic pattern of regeneration. Adult SCs residing in these regenerative tissues play essential roles in the maintenance of these tissues. However, when the skin is wounded, the progeny of SCs from all regions of the HF and IFE contribute to the healing process by changing their initial cell fate to take on an epithelial genotype/phenotype to heal the wound. Although earlier lineage tracing studies helped to define the contributions SCs from the different niches made to wound healing, scRNAseq studies have demonstrated a considerably more nuanced picture. The role of vitamin D signaling will be introduced by reviewing the unique role played by the epidermal keratinocyte first in producing vitamin D and then in metabolizing it into its active form 1,25(OH)2D. 1,25(OH)2D is the principal ligand for the vitamin D receptor (VDR), a transcription factor that helps to mediate the genomic changes in the stem cells in their response to wounding. In these actions, the VDR is regulated by coregulators, of which the steroid receptor coactivator complexes SRC 2 and 3 and the mediator complex (MED) play essential roles. The VDR generally acts in association with other transcription factors such as p63 and β-catenin that can colocalize with the VDR in the genes it regulates. Although much remains to be understood, the role of the VDR in the stem cell response to wounding is clearly essential and quite different from its classic roles in regulating calcium metabolism, although calcium is essential for the actions of vitamin D signaling in the skin. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3422 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Agonist Activity between CB1 and CB2 Receptors with Orthosteric Site Mutations
by Christina A. Brust, Matthew A. Swanson, Christos Iliopoulos Tsoutsouvas, Snezana T. Dimova, Vuong Q. Dang, Edward L. Stahl, Jo-Hao Ho, Spyros P. Nikas, Alexandros Makriyannis and Laura M. Bohn
Receptors 2024, 3(3), 380-396; https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors3030018 - 6 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1049
Abstract
Human endocannabinoid signaling is primarily mediated by the cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, which are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). These receptors have been linked to a variety of physiological processes and are being pursued as prospective drug targets due to their potential in [...] Read more.
Human endocannabinoid signaling is primarily mediated by the cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, which are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). These receptors have been linked to a variety of physiological processes and are being pursued as prospective drug targets due to their potential in treating pain and inflammation. However, because of their homology and shared signaling mechanisms, investigating the individual physiological roles of these receptors and designing subtype-selective ligands has been challenging. Using active-state CB1 and CB2 structures as guides, homologous residues within the orthosteric pocket of each receptor were mutated to alanine to test whether they equally impair CB1 and CB2 activity in response to two high-affinity, nonselective agonists (CP55,940 and AM12033). Interestingly, mutating the Y5.39 position impairs CB1 but not CB2 function. Conversely, mutating residue C6.47 improves CB1 but impairs CB2 signaling. The F7.35A mutation leads to a decrease in CP55,940 potency at CB1 and impairs internalization; however, AM12033 gains potency and promotes CB1 internalization. In CB2, mutation of F7.35A decreases the potency of CP55,940 and neither agonist induces internalization. These observations provide some insight into functional sensitivity of CB1 and CB2 to different agonists when conserved residues are mutated in the orthosteric pocket. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1567 KiB  
Review
Current Evidence of Natural Products against Overweight and Obesity: Molecular Targets and Mechanisms of Action
by Cristina Alicia Elizalde-Romero, Nayely Leyva-López, Laura Aracely Contreras-Angulo, Rigoberto Cabanillas Ponce de-León, Libia Zulema Rodriguez-Anaya, Josefina León-Félix, J. Basilio Heredia, Saul Armando Beltrán-Ontiveros and Erick Paul Gutiérrez-Grijalva
Receptors 2024, 3(3), 362-379; https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors3030017 - 11 Jul 2024
Viewed by 544
Abstract
Overweight and obesity are global health and economic concerns. This disease can affect every system of the human body and can lead to complications such as metabolic syndrome, diabetes, cancer, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular diseases, and hypertension, among others. Treatment may sometimes include diet, exercise, [...] Read more.
Overweight and obesity are global health and economic concerns. This disease can affect every system of the human body and can lead to complications such as metabolic syndrome, diabetes, cancer, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular diseases, and hypertension, among others. Treatment may sometimes include diet, exercise, drugs, and bariatric surgery. Nonetheless, not all people have access to these treatments, and public health strategies consider prevention the most important factor. In this regard, recent investigations are aiming to find alternatives and adjuvants for the treatment of obesity, its prevention, and the reversion of some of its complications, using natural sources of anti-obesogenic compounds like polyphenols, terpenes, alkaloids, and saponins, among others. In this review, we gather the most current information using PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Cochrane, and the Web of Science. We present and discuss the current information about natural products that have shown anti-obesogenic effects at a molecular level. We also consider the impact of dietary habits and lifestyle on preventing overweight and obesity due to the evidence of the benefits of certain foods and compounds consumed regularly. We discuss mechanisms, pathways, and receptors involved in the modulation of obesity, especially those related to inflammation and oxidative stress linked to this disease, due to the relevance of these two aspects in developing complications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

39 pages, 3049 KiB  
Review
Receptor-Targeted Nanomedicine for Cancer Therapy
by Arvee Prajapati, Shagun Rangra, Rashmi Patil, Nimeet Desai, Vaskuri G. S. Sainaga Jyothi, Sagar Salave, Prakash Amate, Derajram Benival and Nagavendra Kommineni
Receptors 2024, 3(3), 323-361; https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors3030016 - 3 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1554
Abstract
Receptor-targeted drug delivery has been extensively explored for active targeting of therapeutic moiety in cancer treatment. In this review, we discuss the receptors that are overexpressed on tumor cells and have the potential to be targeted by nanocarrier systems for cancer treatment. We [...] Read more.
Receptor-targeted drug delivery has been extensively explored for active targeting of therapeutic moiety in cancer treatment. In this review, we discuss the receptors that are overexpressed on tumor cells and have the potential to be targeted by nanocarrier systems for cancer treatment. We also highlight the different types of nanocarrier systems and targeting ligands that researchers have explored. Our discussion covers various therapeutic modalities, including small molecules, aptamers, peptides, antibodies, and cell-based targeting strategies, and focuses on clinical developments. Additionally, this article highlights the challenges that arise during the clinical translation of nanocarrier-based targeting strategies. It also provides future directions for improving research in the area of clinically translatable cancer-targeted therapy to improve treatment efficacy while minimizing toxicity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1600 KiB  
Review
Targeting Liver X Receptors in Cancer Drug Discovery
by Asitha Premaratne, Abhinav Bagchi, Shinjini Basu, Jan-Åke Gustafsson and Chin-Yo Lin
Receptors 2024, 3(3), 304-322; https://doi.org/10.3390/receptors3030015 - 29 Jun 2024
Viewed by 722
Abstract
Liver X receptors (LXRs) are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors. LXRα is predominantly expressed in metabolic tissues, whereas LXRβ is ubiquitously expressed. Upon ligand binding, they regulate the expression of target genes involved in lipid metabolism, cholesterol homeostasis, [...] Read more.
Liver X receptors (LXRs) are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors. LXRα is predominantly expressed in metabolic tissues, whereas LXRβ is ubiquitously expressed. Upon ligand binding, they regulate the expression of target genes involved in lipid metabolism, cholesterol homeostasis, and immune responses, including those which function in pathways that are commonly reprogrammed during carcinogenesis. Known LXR ligands include oxysterols and natural and synthetic agonists which upregulate LXR transcriptional activity and target gene expression. Synthetic inverse agonists have also been identified that inhibit LXR activity. While both types of ligands have been shown to inhibit cancer cells and tumor growth either directly or indirectly by modulating the activities of stromal cells within the tumor microenvironment, they appear to target different aspects of cancer metabolism and other cancer hallmarks, including immune evasion. This review summarizes the characterization of LXRs and their ligands and their mechanisms of action in cancer models and discusses the future directions for translating these discoveries into novel cancer therapeutics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop