Next Article in Journal
Relationships among Student-Athletes’ Identity and Mental Health Condition—Survey in the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison between Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Body Mass Index Methods in Determination of Obesity Prevalence of Chinese Preschoolers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

The Impact of the Average Temperature, Humidity, Wind Speed, Altitude, and Population Density on Daily COVID-19 Infection Evolution †

1
Team of Sciences and Advanced Technologies, Department of Sciences, Industrial and Civil Technologies, National School of Applied Sciences, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tetouan 2222, Morocco
2
Department of Electrical and Industrial Engineering, National School of Applied Sciences, Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Tangier 1818, Morocco
3
Laboratory of M3ER-, FSTE, Department of Physics, Moulay Ismail University, Errachidia 52000, Morocco
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Environmental Research and Public Health—Public Health Issues in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic, 11–25 January 2021; Available online: https://ecerph-3.sciforum.net/.
Med. Sci. Forum 2021, 4(1), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/ECERPH-3-09094
Published: 11 January 2021

Abstract

:
The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of climate conditions, altitude, and population density on daily COVID-19 infection evolution. For an average wind speed of greater than 25 km/h, the number of daily COVID-19 infections slightly decreased with a rate of 10%, while the temperature, humidity and altitude factors did not affect its evolution. Furthermore, population density strongly affects its progression with an approximate rate of 90%. Finally, we propose a mathematical model to estimate the evolution of COVID-19 infections over time by simultaneously taking into consideration the wind speed and the population density effects.

1. Introduction

Historically, between 1918 and 1920, the Great Influenza Pandemic which is known as the Spanish Flu caused 39 million deaths which means 2% of the world population [1]. Moreover, other respiratory pandemics have appeared such as Swine Flu, SARS, Ebola, MERS and lately the COVID-19 pandemic which is an infectious disease caused by a newly discovered coronavirus [1,2,3,4]. In December 2019, the city of Wuhan in the Hubei province in China attracted worldwide attention because of a new respiratory viral disease outbreak of an unknown cause. By 7 January 2020, Chinese scientists had isolated a novel coronavirus (COVID-19) from patients in Wuhan [5]. On the 10 January 2020, 41 patients contracted COVID-19, 6 of whom recovered, 7 of whom had critical conditions, and the rest of which were in a stable condition [6]. On 30 April 2020, the number of infections reached 3,090,445 with 217,769 deaths and 1,030,715 recoveries [7].
Recently, because of the quick spread of the COVID-19 pandemic around the globe, the World Health Organization announced a state of emergency which has put researchers and scientists from different fields in front of a great challenge; to analyze and uncover the mechanism of the evolution of this serious pandemic, each from their own prospective. Understanding how environmental parameters and population density factors affect the spread of COVID-19 [8,9,10] is still a vital question that could help the global community to introduce the right solutions as well as inventing new technologies to prevent along with reducing COVID-19 infection progression.
The aim of this paper is to study the impact of the climate parameters (daily average temperature, daily average humidity and daily average wind speed), altitude and population density on the daily number of COVID-19 infections around six different cities: Casablanca (Morocco), New York (USA), Madrid (Spain), Lombardy Milan (Italy), Paris (France), and Wuhan (China) between the first February and 25 April 2020. Consequently, we have proposed a mathematical model to simultaneously estimate the impact of wind speed factor and population density on daily COVID-19 cases.

2. Materials and Methods

The databases of the daily average temperature, humidity, and wind speed across the cities of Casablanca, New York, Madrid, Lombardy-Milan, Paris, and Wuhan were collected between 23 January and 25 April 2020. Moreover, we have determined the average altitude, average annual number of population and visitors plus the daily and cumulated COVID-19 infections’ evolution around the six studied cities (Figure A1, Figure A2 and Figure A3 and Table A1 in Appendix A).
According to experimental epidemiologists’ estimations, 95% of patients had an estimated median incubation period of 4 to 5.1 days and 97.5% of them had symptoms of 11.1 days [11]. Consequently, the duration between the day when a susceptible person will be infected by COVID-19 virus and the day on which the case could be detected is estimated to be 9 days. Thus, we can say that the climate parameters (Temperature: Ti, Humidity: Hi, Wind speed: Wi) on i day show their impacts on N(i + 9) detected cases at (i + 9) days.
We have classified the studied factors into two types of variables:
  • Dependent variables: Daily temperature, Ti; Daily humidity, Hi; Daily wind speed, Wi.
  • Independent variables: Altitude, average annual population density.
We assume that the average annual population density is constant and given by:
Ptotal = Ps + Pt
where, Ps is the average annual population density in a city and Pt is the average annual visitors’ density across each city.
  • ✓ Before the lockdown: Ptotal = Ps + P
  • ✓ After the lockdown: Ptotal = Ps
The average annual number of populations N(t) in a city could be presented as [12]:
N(t) = S(t) + I(t) + R(t)
where:
  • S(t): Number of susceptibles on day (t).
  • I(t): Number of infected cases on day (t).
  • R(t): Number of recovered patients on day (t).
The variables S(t), I(t) and R(t) vary over time and they could be presented by a system of three differential equations as follow [13]:
dS dt = aS t   t dI dt = aS t   I t bI t dR dt = bI t
where:
a:
Expected number of people an infected person infects per day (a ≈ 1/tip).
b:
The proportion of recovered patients per day (b = 1/D), while D is the approximate number of days when patient will recover (D = 14 days in our estimations).
tip:
The estimated average incubation period (equals 5.75 days in our study) in which an infected patient could infect other susceptible.

3. Results and Discussion

The analysis of the impact of the average daily temperature, average daily humidity, and the average altitude (Figure A4, Figure A5 and Figure A6 in Appendix B) shows that these factors have no effect on daily COVID-19 infection evolution for the studied period. While, Hwaiz et al. [14] have presented a study shows that the increase of daily reported cases and mortality rates is due to the increasing of temperature from April to June. Furthermore, their work show also that the increase of temperature has no effect on reducing the number of daily COVID-19 infected cases Other study done by J. dos Santos [15] to measure the effect of climatic conditions on the prevalence rate of COVID-19 in Brazilian states given the exogenous nature of climate variables. The results showed that increases of 1% in the solar incidence, average temperature, and relative humidity of the air reduced COVID-19 prevalence rates by 0.16%, 0.049%, and 0.22%, respectively, considering the 11-day moving average.
In Figure 1 we note that, for an average wind speed of more than 25 Km/h, the amplitude of daily confirmed infections is reduced across the studied cities, which means that the wind speed factor slightly impacts the daily COVID-19 infection evolution compared to the other climatic parameters under study.
Figure 2 shows that the population density factor greatly affects the daily number of COVID-19 infections with a rate of 90%, compared to the other parameters under study. Furthermore, the speed of COVID-19 spread was faster in the area which is highly populated such as NewYork and Wuhan, and the quarantine was the only solution to reduce the progression of COVID-19 infections’ evolution (Figure A2 and Figure A3 in Appendix A).
Based on those results, the previous system of differential Equations (3) could be rewritten as:
(4) d S d t = a + γ S t t i p . I t t i p (5) d I d t = a + γ S t t i p . I t t i p b + γ I t       (6) d R d t = b + γ I   t
where γ is the proportion in which wind speed contributes to reducing the number of susceptible people infected.
Furthermore, the subtracted time-period tip from t time, means that an infected patient could infect one susceptible person or more after an incubation period of tip = 5.75 days.
The population density factor affects the evolution of infections by 90%, while the wind speed affects it by only 10%, so γ < a; then, we estimated that γ a 9 .
So, these conditions could be described mathematically, as follows:
i f   S > a + γ b + γ     s O     d I d t > 0   ,   w e   s a y     t h a t   t h e   C O V I D 19   e p i d e m i c   g r o w s   i f   S < a b     s O     d I d t < 0 ,   w e   s a y     t h a t   t h e   C O V I D 19   e p i d e m i c   s h r i n k s
where the coefficient a + γ b + γ presents the threshold and the initial conditions of S0, I0 and R0 successively presents the proportions of susceptible people, infected cases, and recovered patients at t0 in each city, while a = 0.35, b = 0.111, and γ = 0.04.
Figure 3 shows the comparison between SIR model, where only population density was taken into account, and our estimated model, where we simultaneously implemented the impact of wind speed and population density factors in order to estimate their effects on daily COVID-19 infection evolution.

4. Conclusions

The objective of this work is to study the impact of climate parameters, altitude, and population density factors on the daily number of COVID-19 infections over 85 days, between the 1 February the 25 April 2020 around six cities (Casablanca, Paris, Madrid, Lombardy-Milan, New York and Wuhan). The main results of this research showed that:
  • The temperature, the humidity and the altitude parameters have no impact on daily COVID-19 infection evolution.
  • For an average wind speed of greater than 25 km/h, the number of COVID-19 infections is slightly decreased, with an approximate rate of 10%.
  • Population density has a significant impact on the daily COVID-19 spread with a rate of 90%.
Based on this study, a mathematical model is proposed in which we simultaneously considered the wind speed, and the population density effects on daily COVID-19 infection evolution; consequently, in our estimated model, the number of daily susceptible people and infections has slightly decreased compared to the presented S-I-R model.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.L. and L.L.; Data curation, R.L. and L.L.; Formal analysis, R.L. and L.L.; investigation, A.D. and A.K.; Project administration, R.L. and L.L.; Supervision, A.D. and A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank every single author for her/his contribution to achieve this work. Also, we are grateful to Letitia Fossati for the English proofreading.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Climate condition changes across the studied cities between 23 January and 25 April 2020.
Figure A1. Climate condition changes across the studied cities between 23 January and 25 April 2020.
Msf 04 00030 g0a1
Table A1. Table A1. Climate data of the sixth cities under study.
Table A1. Table A1. Climate data of the sixth cities under study.
Average TemperatureAverage HumidityAverage Wind Speed
MinimalMaximalMinimalMaximalMinimalMaximal
Casablanca13.5 °C20 °C55%90.5%6 km/h25 km/h
New York−0.5 °C16.5 °C24.5%91.8%11.2 km/h55.7 km/h
Madrid5 °C16.3 °C47.5%95.3%4.5 km/h60.8 km/h
Lombardy-Milan4.5 °C19.3 °C28.7%96%4.96 km/h32 km/h
Paris4.5 °C19 °C40%93%6.88 km/h55 km/h
Wuhan3 °C19 °C37%87%6 km/h29 km/h
Figure A2. Average annual population density and visitors across the six cities under study [16].
Figure A2. Average annual population density and visitors across the six cities under study [16].
Msf 04 00030 g0a2
Figure A3. Evolution of daily and total COVID-19 infections over time (days) with a logarithmic scale [17,18,19,20,21,22].
Figure A3. Evolution of daily and total COVID-19 infections over time (days) with a logarithmic scale [17,18,19,20,21,22].
Msf 04 00030 g0a3

Appendix B

Figure A4. Influence of temperature on the daily number of COVID-19 infected cases.
Figure A4. Influence of temperature on the daily number of COVID-19 infected cases.
Msf 04 00030 g0a4
Figure A5. Average humidity impact on the daily number of COVID-19 infections.
Figure A5. Average humidity impact on the daily number of COVID-19 infections.
Msf 04 00030 g0a5
Figure A6. Average altitude of the studied cities [23].
Figure A6. Average altitude of the studied cities [23].
Msf 04 00030 g0a6

References

  1. Lupia, T.; Scabini, S.; Pinna, S.M.; Di Perri, G.; De Rosa, F.G.; Corcione, S. 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak: A new challenge. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 21, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chen, S.; Yang, J.; Yang, W.; Wang, C.; Bärnighausen, T. COVID-19 control in China during mass population movements at New Year. Lancet 2020, 395, 764–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Berenbaum, M.R. PNAS and the pandemic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 9650–9651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Trilla, A.; Trilla, G.; Daer, C. The 1918 “Spanish Flu” in Spain. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 47, 668–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Wang, C.; Horby, P.W.; Hayden, F.G.; Gao, G.F. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet 2020, 395, 470–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Hui, D.S.; Azhar, E.I.; Madani, T.A.; Ntoumi, F.; Kock, R.; Dar, O.; Ippolito, G.; Mchugh, T.D.; Memish, Z.A.; Drosten, C.; et al. The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health—The latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 91, 264–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. World Health Organization. World Health Organization COVID-19 Dashboard. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed on 10 January 2021).
  8. Şahin, M. Impact of weather on COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 728, 138810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sajadi, M.M.; Habibzadeh, P.; Vintzileos, A.; Shokouhi, S.; Miralles-Wilhelm, F.; Amoroso, A. Temperature and Latitude Analysis to Predict Potential Spread and Seasonality for COVID-19. SSRN Electron. J. Mar. 2020, 3, e2011834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wells, C.R.; Sah, P.; Moghadas, S.M.; Pandey, A.; Shoukat, A.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Meyers, L.A.; Singer, B.H.; Galvani, A.P. Impact of international travel and border control measures on the global spread of the novel 2019 coronavirus outbreak. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 7504–7509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Pung, R.; Chiew, C.J.; Young, B.E.; Chin, S.; Chen, M.I.; Clapham, H.E.; Cook, A.R.; Maurer-Stroh, S.; Toh, M.P.H.S.; Poh, C.; et al. Investigation of three clusters of COVID-19 in Singapore: Implications for surveillance and response measures. Lancet 2020, 395, 1039–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. You, C.; Deng, Y.; Hu, W.; Sun, J.; Lin, Q.; Zhou, F.; Pang, C.H.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, X.-H. Estimation of the time-varying reproduction number of COVID-19 outbreak in China. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2020, 228, 113555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. McCluskey, C.C. Complete global stability for an SIR epidemic model with delay—Distributed or discrete. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 2010, 11, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hwaiz, R.; Ali, K.; Al-Tawil, N. Effect of Lockdown, Temperature, and Humidity on the Pattern of COVID-19 in Erbil Province, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Diyala J. Med. 2021, 20, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dos Santos, J.M.A.; de Menezes, T.A.; de Arruda, R.G.; Fernandes, F.E.C.V. Climate Influences on COVID-19 Prevalence Rates: An Application of a Panel Data Spatial Model. Reg. Sci. Policy Pract. 2021, 22, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Baron, C. Demographics Statista. 2020. Available online: https://www.statista.com/markets/411/topic/446/demographics/ (accessed on 1 March 2020).
  17. Health Care Ministry of Morocco. Statistiques et Cas Coronavirus au Maroc. 2020. Available online: http://www.covidmaroc.ma/Pages/AccueilAR.aspx (accessed on 30 April 2020).
  18. NewYork Governor. New York State Government, Oficial Website. 2020. Available online: http://en.nhc.gov.cn/news.html (accessed on 30 April 2020).
  19. De Sanidad, E.M. El Coronavirus, en Datos Casos en España y el Mundo. 2020. Available online: https://www.eldiario.es/sociedad/mapa-evolucion-coronavirus-expansion-Espana.html (accessed on 30 April 2020).
  20. Flourish. Coronavirus in Italy: Updated Map and Case Count. 2020. Available online: https://lab24.ilsole24ore.com/coronavirus/en/ (accessed on 30 April 2020).
  21. Nirasay, S. Statistiques et cas Coronavirus COVID-19 Île-de-France. 2020. Available online: https://www.cascoronavirus.fr/ (accessed on 30 April 2020).
  22. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Novel Coronavirus Cases in China. 2020. Available online: http://en.nhc.gov.cn/ (accessed on 30 April 2020).
  23. Sas, O. Topographic Maps, Elevation, Relief. 2020. Available online: https://en-gb.topographic-map.com/ (accessed on 5 March 2020).
Figure 1. Influence of wind speed on the number of daily cases infected.
Figure 1. Influence of wind speed on the number of daily cases infected.
Msf 04 00030 g001
Figure 2. Average population density before and after the quarantine of across the cities under study [16].
Figure 2. Average population density before and after the quarantine of across the cities under study [16].
Msf 04 00030 g002
Figure 3. Comparison between SIR model and the proposal mathematical model.
Figure 3. Comparison between SIR model and the proposal mathematical model.
Msf 04 00030 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lagtayi, R.; Lairgi, L.; Daya, A.; Khouya, A. The Impact of the Average Temperature, Humidity, Wind Speed, Altitude, and Population Density on Daily COVID-19 Infection Evolution. Med. Sci. Forum 2021, 4, 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECERPH-3-09094

AMA Style

Lagtayi R, Lairgi L, Daya A, Khouya A. The Impact of the Average Temperature, Humidity, Wind Speed, Altitude, and Population Density on Daily COVID-19 Infection Evolution. Medical Sciences Forum. 2021; 4(1):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECERPH-3-09094

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lagtayi, Rachid, Lamya Lairgi, Abdelmajid Daya, and Ahmed Khouya. 2021. "The Impact of the Average Temperature, Humidity, Wind Speed, Altitude, and Population Density on Daily COVID-19 Infection Evolution" Medical Sciences Forum 4, no. 1: 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECERPH-3-09094

APA Style

Lagtayi, R., Lairgi, L., Daya, A., & Khouya, A. (2021). The Impact of the Average Temperature, Humidity, Wind Speed, Altitude, and Population Density on Daily COVID-19 Infection Evolution. Medical Sciences Forum, 4(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECERPH-3-09094

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop