Preface and Statement of Peer Review
1. Introduction
1.1. Conference Introduction
- Characterize the various therapies currently available for locally advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma;
- Identify the novel approaches to non-clear RCC patient management;
- Understand the role of the tumor microenvironment in kidney cancer;
- Discuss how to design biomarker-driven clinical trials in kidney cancer.
1.2. Organizers
1.3. Scopes and Topics
- Tumor biology and microenvironment;
- Novel therapeutics and immunotherapy combinations;
- Translational and biomarker studies;
- Real-world evidence and registry-based research;
- Imaging and surveillance strategies;
- Quality of care, disparities, and patient-reported outcomes;
- Preclinical models and artificial intelligence applications.
1.4. Program and Schedule
2. Committee Members
2.1. Organizing Committee
- Salvatore La Rosa, Chief Scientific Officer, KCA, USA.
- Gabriela Galvan, Program Coordinator, KCA, USA.
- Jeanette Stensgaard, ShePlans Co, USA.
- Kristen Brady, TFF, USA.
- Ashley Smeaton, TFF, USA.
2.2. Scientific Committee Co-Chairs
- Axel Bex, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Netherlands.
- Ignacio Durán, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Spain.
- Lisa Pickering, Royal Marsden Hospital, UK.
2.3. Scientific Committee Members
- Christian Beisland, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway.
- Annika Fendler, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
- Roberto Iacovelli, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Italy.
- Stéphane Oudard, Université Paris Cité, France.
- Cristina Suárez, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Spain.
- Maxine Tran, University College London, United Kingdom.
3. Sponsors
4. Statement of Peer Review
- Type of peer review: single-blind.
- Conference submission management system: SessionBoard.
- Number of submissions sent for review: 6.
- Number of submissions accepted: 6.
- Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 1.
- Average number of reviews per paper: 1.8.
- Total number of reviewers involved: 5.
5. Peer Review Criteria and Process
Conflicts of Interest
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bex, A.; Durán, I.; La Rosa, S.; Pickering, L. Preface and Statement of Peer Review. Med. Sci. Forum 2025, 39, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2025039007
Bex A, Durán I, La Rosa S, Pickering L. Preface and Statement of Peer Review. Medical Sciences Forum. 2025; 39(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2025039007
Chicago/Turabian StyleBex, Axel, Ignacio Durán, Salvatore La Rosa, and Lisa Pickering. 2025. "Preface and Statement of Peer Review" Medical Sciences Forum 39, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2025039007
APA StyleBex, A., Durán, I., La Rosa, S., & Pickering, L. (2025). Preface and Statement of Peer Review. Medical Sciences Forum, 39(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2025039007

