Next Article in Journal
Towards a One Health Assessment of Artisanal and Informal Mining in Benue State, Nigeria
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of COVID-19 on Influenza Virus Vaccination Coverage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Nanoemulsions: A Promising Strategy in the Fight against Bacterial Infections †

by
Thais Mariana Bezerra Tavares
,
Hélida Maravilha Dantas e Sousa Almeida
,
Marina Victória Moura Lage
,
Renata de Carvalho Feitosa
and
Arnóbio Antônio da Silva Júnior
*
Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biotechnology, Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte—UFRN, Natal 59012-570, RN, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Antibiotics (ECA 2023), 1–15 December 2023; Available online: https://eca2023.sciforum.net/.
Med. Sci. Forum 2024, 24(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/ECA2023-16402
Published: 30 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Antibiotics)

Abstract

:
In recent years, bacterial infections have become a major global concern, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, the development and commercialization of new antibacterial drugs have been slow, while pathogens continue to rapidly adapt and evolve. To address this challenge, nanotechnology offers a promising strategy by protecting, targeting, and releasing active compounds to fight against these emerging strains. The aim of this study was to explore the antibacterial potential of nanoemulsions (NEs), as reported in the scientific literature. A literature review was carried out utilizing the keywords “nanoemulsion”, “antibiotic activity”, “antibacterial activity”, and “antimicrobial activity”. All of the scientific articles that were related to the area of health and published in the last 5 years were included. All of the studies indicated that oil-based NEs with inherent antibacterial activity, even without the presence of drugs, had superior action against strains compared to non-emulsified oil, as well as other systems incorporating drugs or actives. Although the results are promising, further investigations and testing of formulations against resistant bacterial strains are necessary. This review aims to provide valuable insights for researchers and contribute to future advancements in this field.

1. Introduction

Bacterial infections have been causes of morbidity and mortality and have experienced alarming growth in recent years. This scenario is the result of the rapid adaptation and evolution of pathogens through various strategies, such as by means of antibiotic destruction or reflux and the modification of the target structure [1]. On the other hand, the development and commercialization of new antimicrobials to combat these emerging bacterial strains is extremely slow [2].
In this context, nanotechnology emerges as a promising area of research in the search for innovative antimicrobial solutions. This strategy, characterized as nanoscale drug delivery systems, has aroused considerable interest due to its capabilities to improve the availability and targeted efficacy of drugs, being an attractive proposal to mitigate several problems [3,4]. Under this perspective, several innovative nanosystems can be listed, such as liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, and metallic nanoparticles.
These nanoformulations offer the opportunity to improve therapeutic performance by modifying their composition, particle size, and surface characteristics, aiming to increase their efficacy, reduce side effects, and overcome drug resistance [5]. At this juncture, nanoemulsions (NE) can also be listed, which have been recognized as an advantageous approach for drug delivery, due to their ability to improve solubility, stability, and bioavailability, as well as their potential for targeting organs and cells [3,4,5,6].

2. Methodology

The scientific literature was reviewed, following the steps set out in accordance with the methodological protocol described by Almeida et al. [7]. For this purpose, the acronym PICo was adopted to write the inquiry, as shown in Table 1.
Thus, this study question was presented: “what does the scientific literature (P) present about the antibacterial activity (I) of nanoemulsified systems (Co)?”. Then, the bibliographic search began in May 2023 in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The search terms “nanoemulsion”, “antibiotic activity”, “antibacterial activity”, and “antimicrobial activity” were used, and studies published in the last five years were prioritized. We selected studies that explicitly stated in their abstract or title that the text referred to the activity of NE systems against bacterial strains. The inclusion criteria were studies published in the form of scientific articles. Duplicate articles, studies published in events, editorials, and literature reviews that did not deal with applications for health sciences, reporting gels, membranes, or freeze-dried formulations were excluded from the sample.
Data collection took place after the individual study. From this point onwards, a construction of the state-of-the-art strategy began to answer the guiding question. There was no need to appeal to ethics committees. All of the consulted authors were made available, guaranteeing the due ethical principles implicit.

3. Results and Discussion

Nanotechnology is used in the field of health for the development of diagnostics and delivery of drugs to improve therapeutic efficacy. This type of technology is very attractive because it can obtain nanosystems, which can reach and be specific to active sites, in addition to causing fewer adverse effects. From the perspective of antibiotic therapy, this strategy arouses interest among researchers, given the chaotic scenario related to the global need for innovative antimicrobial therapies [1,3,4,6]. From this brief review of the scientific literature, it was observed that 100% (n = 20) of the studies analyzed developed NE with biological activity against various pathogenic bacterial strains.
These formulations can be prepared by methods that provide low energy or high energy for the formation of nanometer-scale droplets. Both have their advantages and specific applications. Among the studies analyzed, 60% (n = 12) used high-energy methods to obtain the systems. The high-energy method most cited in the articles was ultrasound, which generates high-frequency mechanical waves, resulting in cycles of compression and expansion in the liquid, which causes cavitation, which in turn creates strong shear forces and turbulence, breaking the larger oil droplets into smaller sizes, forming an NE [8,9]. Despite the ease of obtaining nanometric droplets through this procedure, the large amount of energy that the system requires makes this method expensive.
Only 8 of the 20 studies analyzed mentioned a low-energy supply to obtain antibacterial nanoformulations. NEs obtained using low-energy consumption present economic advantages for large-scale production. The low-energy methods mentioned in the articles were spontaneous emulsification (n = 5; 25%) and phase inversion (n = 3; 15%), using constant magnetic stirring. Spontaneous emulsification is a natural process in which there is a variation in the amount of surfactants, which can be combined with changes in temperature. These variations alter the surface energy of the interface between the phases, leading to the spontaneous formation of an NE [10,11]. The phase inversion method involves gradually adding water or another solvent to the oil–water or water–oil mixture. As the amount of water increases, the emulsion inverts, transforming an oil-in-water emulsion into a water-in-oil emulsion (or vice versa), forming an NE [12,13,14,15,16].
The oily phase of the systems was predominantly composed of essential oils (EO) in 70% of the articles consulted (n = 14). In these studies, the incorporation of bioactives or additional drugs into the system was not identified [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Only 30% (n = 6) of the authors added some type of bioactive molecule to the nanosystem. This fact is inferred because the authors used other types of compounds to compose the NE matrix, such as vegetable oils and oleic acid. Only one study incorporated antibiotics into the NE (clindamycin, linezolid, and doxycycline). The other studies added natural bioactive molecules: scalene, green tea catechins, 1,8-cineol, curcumin extract, and green coffee extract (Figure 1) [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30].
As for microbiological tests, 50% (n = 10) of the studies used diffusion in the medium as a method to evaluate the sensitivity of the strains. This type of test is economical, quick, and consists of verifying the inhibition halo. Diffusion can occur using filter paper discs or perforation of the agar, in which the compound to be investigated is deposited after the bacteria have been seeded. The serial dilution method was used in 9 investigated studies, with plate microdilution being the most prevalent. Regarding strains, Gram-positive strains of the genus Staphylococcus have been extensively evaluated for their sensitivity to nanocarriers [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37].
An attempt was made to establish some relationship between droplet size and the antibacterial activity identified. This size/activity relationship had already been discussed in other studies, as described by Álvarez-Chimal et al. [38], concerning greater bacterial inhibition in Gram-positive strains with smaller nanoparticles (up to 10 nm). A similar result was observed in the study by Naqvi et al. [39].
According to Ali et al. [40], the antibacterial action optimized by nanocarriers with smaller particle sizes would be related to the increase in intracellular oxidative stress. This is because the smaller the size of the particles, the greater the interaction between the electron-donating and electron-accepting active sites, generating the activation of several molecular cascades and an increase in reactive oxygen species. The hydrodynamic sizes of the droplets present in the NEs varied, and all were reported to have antimicrobial action (Figure 2), especially depending on the concentration of the active ingredient. However, the composition of NEs has a great influence on their outstanding antibiotic action, as well as aspects related to solubility [41,42]. This argument about the influence of the physicochemical on improving the delivery of the active ingredient properties of the NE can be validated by its antibiotic potential.
This is exemplified in data from the chamomile EO-NE, with a hydrodynamic size close to 300 nm, presenting a minimum inhibitory concentration against several strains: E. coli: 2.19 µg/mL and P. aeruginosa: 1.02 µg/mL, as well as fungal strains, namely: S. pombe: 1.28 µg/mL; C. albicans: 2.65 µg/mL; and C. tropicalis: 1.69 µg/mL [34]. Here the highlight is the demonstration of antimicrobial activity of the NE at an average concentration that is 14 times lower compared to the free EO in ethanol. Another larger NE was that of Cymbopogon pendulus EO, with around 500 nm [32], which resulted in inhibition zones of 3.5 cm for S. aureus and complete inhibition for E. coli strains, B. subtilis, and P. aeruginosa.
Furthermore, we highlight the study of Mohamed et al. [26] who developed a nanobiotics NE (an NE loaded with antibiotics) and tested them on strains of resistant bacterial isolates. The study, in addition to showing greater safety (in cytotoxicity tests) than traditional drugs, managed to overcome the barrier of bacterial resistance. The authors justify this response by the ability of nanostructures loaded with antibiotics to deliver high concentrations of antibiotics to their target sites. However, further investigations from this perspective are necessary to obtain greater conclusions about the potential of these nanocarriers to overcome antibiotic resistance.

4. Conclusions

The data from this preliminary review indicate that NEs may be promising routes for the development of antibacterial drugs, including resistant strains. However, further evaluations are needed regarding the use of antibacterial drugs and their incorporation into nanosystems, as well as further elucidation regarding the relationship between droplet size and the antimicrobial effect.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.M.B.T., H.M.D.e.S.A., R.d.C.F., and A.A.d.S.J.; methodology, H.M.D.e.S.A.; investigation, T.M.B.T., H.M.D.e.S.A., M.V.M.L., and R.d.C.F.; data curation, H.M.D.e.S.A. and R.d.C.F.; writing—original draft preparation, T.M.B.T., H.M.D.e.S.A., M.V.M.L., and R.d.C.F.; writing—review and editing, H.M.D.e.S.A., R.d.C.F., and A.A.d.S.J.; supervision, A.A.d.S.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), grant #117965/2023-5, grant #311209/2020-3 and by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel—Brazil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Christaki, E.; Marcou, M.; Tofarides, A. Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria: Mechanisms, Evolution, and Persistence. J. Mol. Evolut. 2020, 88, 26–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Costa, A.L.P.; Silva Junior, A.C.Z. Bacterial Resistance To Antibiotics And Public Health: A Brief Literature Review. Est. Cient. 2017, 7, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Patra, J.K.; Das, G.; Fraceto, L.F.; Campos, E.V.R.; Rodriguez-Torres, M.D.P.; Acosta-Torres, L.S.; Diaz-Torres, L.A.; Grillo, R.; Swamy, M.K.; Sharma, S.; et al. Nano based drug delivery systems: Recent developments and future prospects. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zong, T.X.; Silveira, A.P.; Morais JA, V.; Sampaio, M.C.; Muehlmann, L.A.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, C.S.; Liu, S.K. Recent Advances in Antimicrobial Nano-Drug Delivery Systems. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yusuf, A.; Almotairy, A.R.Z.; Henidi, H.; Alshehri, O.Y.; Aldughaim, M.S. Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Systems: A Review of the Implication of Nanoparticles’ Physicochemical Properties on Responses in Biological Systems. Polymers 2023, 15, 1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Makabenta, J.M.V.; Nabawy, A.; Li, C.H.; Schmidt-Malan, S.; Patel, R.; Rotello, V.M. Nanomaterial-based therapeutics for antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Almeida, H.; Souza, T.V.; Souza, A.M.; Feitosa, R.C.; Escarião, W.K.; Cornélio, A.M.; Júnior, A.A. Terpenes activity towards the central nervous system: Perspectives for health. In Proceedings of the MOL2NET’23, 9th ed.; MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chavan, P.; Sharma, P.; Sharma, S.R.; Mittal, T.C.; Jaiswal, A.K. Application of High-Intensity Ultrasound to Improve Food Processing Efficiency. Foods 2022, 11, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bababode, A.K.; Poorva, S.; Sawinder, K. Recent nano, micro and macrotechnological applications of ultrasonication in food-based systems. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 599–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kruglyakov, P.M. Examples of the implementation of hydrophilicity- lipophilicity concepts in the development of the formulations of surfactants and selection of solid particles for certain purposes. Stud. Interface Sci. 2000, 9, 314–374. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hong, C.; Daming, W.; Xiao, W.; Zhongbin, Y.; Lijuan, H.; Qiaoqiao, X. Triple Phase Inversion of Emulsions Stabilized by Amphiphilic Graphene Oxide and Cationic Surfactants. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 23524–23532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Akram, S.; Anton, N.; Omran, Z.; Vandamme, T. Water-in-Oil Nano-Emulsions Prepared by Spontaneous Emulsification: New Insights on the Formulation Process. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kotta, S.; Khan, A.W.; Ansari, S.H.; Sharma, R.K.; Ali, J. Formulation of nanoemulsion: A comparison between phase inversion composition method and high-pressure homogenization method. Drug Deliv. 2015, 22, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bouyahya, A.; Mechchate, H.; Benali, T.; Ghchime, R.; Charfi, S.; Balahbib, A.; Burkov, P.; Shariati, M.A.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Omari, N.E. Health Benefits and Pharmacological Properties of Carvone. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Brah, A.S.; Armah, F.A.; Obuah, C.; Akwetey, S.A.; Adokoh, C.K. Toxicity and therapeutic applications of citrus essential oils (CEOs): A review. Intern. Journ Food Prop. 2023, 26, 301–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ishfaq, P.M.; Shukla, A.; Beraiya, S.; Tripathi, S.; Mishra, S.K. Biochemical and Pharmacological Applications of Essential Oils in Human Health Especially in Cancer Prevention. Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 2018, 18, 1815–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chouhan, S.; Sharma, K.; Guleria, S. Antimicrobial Activity of Some Essential Oils-Present Status and Future Perspectives. Medicines 2017, 4, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Nirmala, M.J.; Durai, L.; Gopakumar, V.; Nagarajan, R. Anticancer and antibacterial effects of a clove bud essential oil-based nanoscale emulsion system. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 6439–6450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Maccelli, A.; Vitanza, L.; Imbriano, A.; Fraschetti, C.; Filippi, A.; Goldoni, P.; Maurizi, L.; Ammendolia, M.G.; Crestoni, M.E.; Fornarini, S.; et al. Satureja montana L. Essential Oils: Chemical Profiles/Phytochemical Screening, Antimicrobial Activity and O/W NanoEmulsion Formulations. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rinaldi, F.; Oliva, A.; Sabatino, M.; Imbriano, A.; Hanieh, P.N.; Garzoli, S.; Mastroianni, C.M.; De Angelis, M.; Miele, M.C.; Arnaut, M.; et al. Antimicrobial Essential Oil Formulation: Chitosan Coated Nanoemulsions for Nose to Brain Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alam, A.; Ansari, M.J.; Alqarni, M.H.; Salkini, M.A.; Raish, M. Antioxidant, Antibacterial, and Anticancer Activity of Ultrasonic Nanoemulsion of Cinnamomum Cassia L. Essential Oil. Plants 2023, 12, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abdelhamed, F.M.; Abdeltawab, N.F.; ElRakaiby, M.T.; Shamma, R.N.; Moneib, N.A. Antibacterial and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Thymus vulgaris Essential Oil Nanoemulsion on Acne Vulgaris. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abrar, M.; Ayub, Y.; Nazir, R.; Irshad, M.; Hussain, N.; Saleem, Y. Garlic and ginger essential oil-based neomycin nanoemulsions as effective and accelerated treatment for skin wounds’ healing and inflammation: In vivo and in vitro studies. Saudi Pharm J. 2022, 30, 1700–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Atun, S.; Sinardekawati, A.; Purpratama, A.C.; Aznam, N.; Sangal, A. Curcuminoid Nanoemulsion from Curcuma xanthorrhiza Extract and Its Activity as Antioxidant, Antibacterial and Antifungal. RASAYAN J. Chem. 2022, 15, 907–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hamedi, H.; Moradi, S.; Tonelli, A.E.; Hudson, S.M. Preparation and Characterization of Chitosan–Alginate Polyelectrolyte Complexes Loaded with Antibacterial Thyme Oil Nanoemulsions. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nirmala, M.J.; Durai, L.; Rao, K.A.; Nagarajan, R. Ultrasonic Nanoemulsification of Cuminum cyminum Essential Oil and Its Applications in Medicine. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 795–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fang, J.Y.; Lin, Y.K.; Wang, P.W.; Alalaiwe, A.; Yang, Y.C.; Yang, S.C. The Droplet-Size Effect Of Squalene@cetylpyridinium Chloride Nanoemulsions On Antimicrobial Potency Against Planktonic And Biofilm MRSA. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 8133–8147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Azizkhani, M.; Jafari Kiasari, F.; Tooryan, F.; Shahavi, M.H.; Partovi, R. Preparation and evaluation of food-grade nanoemulsion of tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus L.) essential oil: Antioxidant and antibacterial properties. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 1341–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mohamed, M.A.; Nasr, M.; Elkhatib, W.F.; Eltayeb, W.N. In Vitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity and Cytotoxicity of Different Nanobiotics Targeting Multidrug Resistant and Biofilm Forming Staphylococci. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 7658238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kaur, A.; Gabrani, R.; Dang, S. Nanoemulsions of Green Tea Catechins and Other Natural Compounds for the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection: Antibacterial Analysis. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2019, 9, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Buzanello, E.B.; Pinheiro Machado, G.T.B.; Kuhnen, S.; Mazzarino, L.; Maraschin, M. Nanoemulsions containing oil and aqueous extract of green coffee beans with antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Nano Express 2020, 1, 010058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Agnish, S.; Sharma, A.D.; Kaur, I. Nanoemulsions containing Cymbopogon pendulus essential oil: Development, characterization, stability study, and evaluation of in vitro activities. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 118, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lima, T.S.; Silva, M.F.S.; Nunes, X.P.; Colombo, A.V.; Oliveira, H.P.; Goto, P.L.; Blanzat, M.; Piva, H.L.; Tedesco, A.C.; Siqueira-Moura, M.P. Cineole containing nanoemulsion: Development, stability, and antibacterial activity. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2021, 239, 105113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Das, S.; Horváth, B.; Šafranko, S.; Jokić, S.; Széchenyi, A.; Kőszegi, T. Antimicrobial Activity of Chamomile Essential Oil: Effect of Different Formulations. Molecules 2019, 24, 4321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hosny, K.; Asfour, H.; Rizg, W.; Alhakamy, N.A.; Sindi, A.; Alkhalidi, H.; Abualsunun, W.; Bakhaidar, R.; Almehmady, A.M.; Akeel, S.; et al. Formulation, Optimization, and Evaluation of Oregano Oil Nanoemulsions for the Treatment of Infections Due to Oral Microbiota. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021, 16, 5465–5478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mostafa, N.M. Antibacterial Activity of Ginger (Zingiber officinale) Leaves Essential Oil Nanoemulsion against the Cariogenic Streptococcus mutans. J. App. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 8, 34–41. [Google Scholar]
  37. Nirmala, M.J.; Durai, L.; Gopakumar, V.; Nagarajan, R. Preparation of Celery Essential Oil-Based Nanoemulsion by Ultrasonication and Evaluation of Its Potential Anticancer and Antibacterial Activity. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 7651–7666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Álvarez-Chimal, R.; García-Pérez, V.I.; Álvarez-Pérez, M.A.; Tavera-Hernández, R.; Reyes-Carmona, L.; Martinez-Hernandez, M.; Arenas-Alatorre, J.Á. Influence of the particlesize on the antibacterial activity of green synthesized zincoxide nanoparticles using Dysphania ambrosioides extract. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 103804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Naqvi, Q.U.A.; Kanwal, A.; Qaseem, S.; Naeem, M.; Ali, S.R.; Shaffique, M.; Maqbool, M. Size-dependent inhibition of bacterial growth by chemically engineered spherical ZnO nanoparticles. J. Biol. Phys. 2019, 45, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ali, J.; Irshad, R.; Li, B.; Tahir, K.; Ahmad, A.; Shakeel, M.; Khan, N.U.; Khan, Z.U.H. Synthesis and Characterization of Phytochemical Fabricated Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles with Enhanced Antibacterial and Catalytic Applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 2018, 183, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Terjung, N.; Löffler, M.; Gibis, M.; Hinrichs, J.; Weiss, J. Influence of droplet size on the efficacy of oil-in-water emulsions loaded with phenolic antimicrobials. Food Funct. 2012, 3, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Buranasuksombat, U.; Kwon, Y.J.; Turner, M.; Bhandari, B. Influence of emulsion droplet size on antimicrobial properties. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 20, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Bioactive compounds, microbiological methods, and nanotechnology summarized. Source: Research data.
Figure 1. Bioactive compounds, microbiological methods, and nanotechnology summarized. Source: Research data.
Msf 24 00018 g001
Figure 2. Frequency of the use of bacterial strains and droplet size range of nanoemulsions presented in the studies analyzed. Source: Research data.
Figure 2. Frequency of the use of bacterial strains and droplet size range of nanoemulsions presented in the studies analyzed. Source: Research data.
Msf 24 00018 g002
Table 1. Definition of search terms based on the PICo acronym.
Table 1. Definition of search terms based on the PICo acronym.
AcronymDefinitionCorresponding Term
PPopulationScientific Bibliography
IInterestAntibacterial Activity
coContextNanoemulsion
Source: Research data.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tavares, T.M.B.; Almeida, H.M.D.e.S.; Lage, M.V.M.; de Carvalho Feitosa, R.; da Silva Júnior, A.A. Nanoemulsions: A Promising Strategy in the Fight against Bacterial Infections. Med. Sci. Forum 2024, 24, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECA2023-16402

AMA Style

Tavares TMB, Almeida HMDeS, Lage MVM, de Carvalho Feitosa R, da Silva Júnior AA. Nanoemulsions: A Promising Strategy in the Fight against Bacterial Infections. Medical Sciences Forum. 2024; 24(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECA2023-16402

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tavares, Thais Mariana Bezerra, Hélida Maravilha Dantas e Sousa Almeida, Marina Victória Moura Lage, Renata de Carvalho Feitosa, and Arnóbio Antônio da Silva Júnior. 2024. "Nanoemulsions: A Promising Strategy in the Fight against Bacterial Infections" Medical Sciences Forum 24, no. 1: 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECA2023-16402

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop