1. Introduction
The growing demand for healthier foods, with lower fat content and higher nutritional value, has driven the increasing global appreciation for goat meat [
1,
2]. Modern consumers are increasingly attentive to the sensory and functional quality of foods, preferring lean meats that are easy to digest and have a lipid profile favorable to health [
3,
4]. In this context, goat meat stands out for its distinctive flavor, high nutritional density, low fat and cholesterol content, and as a rich source of high-quality proteins, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and minerals such as iron [
5,
6,
7].
In Brazil, however, goat meat production is still largely traditional, especially in the Northeast, where animals are typically slaughtered at older ages. This practice leads to higher feeding and management costs, as well as reduced production efficiency [
8]. Although the introduction of specialized breeds such as Boer has improved carcass yield and meat quality, few studies have assessed the performance of young animals under commercial conditions.
In Brazil, early-slaughtered kid goats known locally as “mamão” are typically harvested around 60 days of age, yielding tender meat with mild flavor, and carcass weights between 4 and 6 kg. This category holds strong culinary and cultural value, especially in regions that favor gourmet-quality meat cuts of weaned kids (4–6 months, around 12 kg), depending on regional traditions [
9]. In countries such as France, Portugal, and Spain, early-slaughtered kids are traditionally appreciated for their tenderness and mild flavor. Therefore, slaughtering animals at 70 days of age may represent a promising strategy to diversify goat meat products, especially for gourmet markets or consumers seeking tender, low-fat cuts without compromising quality.
In addition to meeting this demand, early slaughter can promote production sustainability by reducing confinement time, input consumption, and increasing herd turnover. These factors improve profitability, particularly for smallholders, and reduce the environmental footprint of meat production.
Age, sex, and live weight significantly influence carcass yield and the physicochemical properties of meat, including color, pH, water-holding capacity, and chemical composition [
10]. The typically low intramuscular and subcutaneous fat deposition in goats can be modulated by genetic and nutritional factors, making it essential to understand their behavior under different slaughter strategies [
11].
In this context, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of age and sex at slaughter (70 and 100 days) on carcass traits, commercial cuts, and meat quality in crossbred kids (non-descript females × Boer bucks). The goal is to generate technical and market-relevant data to support the development and valorization of goat meat as a distinct and strategic product for strengthening the goat production chain in Brazil’s semi-arid regions.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experiment Site
The experiment was carried out at the Estação Experimental Pendência, belonging to the Empresa Estadual de Pesquisa Agropecuária da Paraíba (EMEPA-PB), located between the geographical coordinates 7°8′18″ latitude South and 36°27′2″ latitude west of Greenwich, with an altitude of 534 m. At an average temperature of 30 °C and an average relative humidity of 70.1%.
2.2. Animals
The study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Paraiba-UFPB, Brazil (Protocol number 2305/14).
A total of 32 crossbred goats (Boer × native crossbred kids) were used in the study, comprising 16 males (8 slaughtered at 70 days and 8 at 100 days) and 16 females (8 slaughtered at 70 days and 8 at 100 days). Average birth weights were 3.11 ± 0.64 kg (males) and 3.00 ± 0.76 kg (females) for animals slaughtered at 70 days, and 3.65 ± 0.71 kg (males) and 3.25 ± 0.38 kg (females) for those slaughtered at 100 days of age.
At the beginning of the trial, all animals were individually identified, weighed, treated for ecto- and endoparasites, and vaccinated against clostridial diseases. They were then housed in individual pens, with eight animals per pen, resulting in an average stocking density of approximately 3.5 m2 per animal, ensuring adequate space for welfare and behavioral expression. Body weights were recorded weekly to monitor weight gain. Experimental animals were selected one week prior to the first slaughter (at 70 days), based on birth type (single or twin) and live weight, to minimize the influence of these factors on the variables evaluated.
2.3. Diet and Management
The diet was formulated according to the National Research Council [
12], aiming at a weight gain of 200 g day
−1, with a forage–concentrate ratio of 12:84, composed of Tifton grass hay (
Cynodon dactylon), and the concentrates were composed of ground corn, soybean meal, finely ground mineral supplement, and calcitic limestone. The adaptation of the animals was made for 14 days, and the weight gain was carried out weekly. All experimental animals were selected one week before the first weaning (70 days) (
Table 1). From 10 days of age, the kids received a complete diet ad libitum in their troughs.
After 70 days, the other half of the offspring that remained in the system started different management, and were released with their respective mothers having access to the pickets and multi-nutritional blocks in the morning and the afternoon, when they returned to the facilities, they received hay of Tifton grass (
Cynodon dactylon) and concentrate in a 48% roughage ratio to 52%: concentrate (
Table 2), until 100 days are complete, at the time of slaughter. The concentrate consisted of corn bran (36%), soybean meal (12%), soybean oil (2%), mineral salt, and limestone (2%).
2.4. Meat Quality Evaluation
2.4.1. Pre-Slaughter and Slaughter Conditions
After 48 d on test, animals were weighed to obtain the final live weight (FLW). Subsequently, they underwent a solid 16 h fast. After this period, they were weighed again in order to obtain body weight at slaughter (BWS) and to determine the weight loss due to fasting. All lambs were slaughtered on the same day by using standard commercial procedures according to the Brazilian welfare codes of practice [
13] in the industrial slaughterhouse of the Federal University in Paraíba–Bananeiras Campus. Prior to slaughter, the animals were transported in a truck specifically designed for livestock transport during the early hours of the day to ensure low ambient temperatures and minimize thermal stress and discomfort during handling. The animals were stunned with a captive dart pistol and left bleeding for four minutes after sectioning the carotid and jugular veins. After skinning and evisceration, the head (sectioned at the atlanto-occipital joint) and the hooves (sectioned at the metacarpal and metatarsal joints) were removed.
After skinning and evisceration, the head and the hooves were removed, and the weight of the hot carcass was recorded (HCR). The kidneys and perirenal fat were removed from the carcass prior to weighing and estimation of the hot carcass yield (HCY).
All non-carcass components, whether edible or not, were weighed. The viscera were emptied, washed, and reweighed to determine the yields of buchada and panelada. The buchada components included: blood, liver, kidneys, lungs, spleen, tongue, heart, abomasum, rumen, reticulum, omasum, and small intestine [
14]. For panelada, the head and feet were also included [
15].
2.4.2. Carcass Quality Traits
The carcasses were taken to the cold chamber, with an average temperature of 4 °C, where they remained for 24 h suspended from hooks by the tendon of the gastrocnemius muscle. The measurement of meat pH was performed 24 h post-mortem [
16] on the Longissimus lumborum (LL) muscle, by using a digital potentiometer (DIGIMED, model pH 300 M, São Paulo, Brazil), equipped with a glass electrode.
Carcasses were placed in a cold room at 4 °C for 24 h, suspended by the gastrocnemius tendon. Cold carcass weight (CCW) was then recorded following the methodology of Cezar and Sousa [
16]. Based on these measurements, the following indices were calculated: hot carcass yield (HCY = HCW/SBW × 100), cold carcass yield (CCY = CCW/SBW × 100), and chilling loss (CL = [(HCW − CCW)/HCW] × 100).
The gastrointestinal tract (GIT) was weighed full and empty to estimate empty body weight (EBW) using the formula: EBW = SBW − [(GIT full − GIT empty) + urine + bile]. This variable was used to calculate true or biological yield (BY = HCW/EBW × 100).
After cold storage, the cold carcasses were weighed to determine the cold carcass weight and were subjected to the following morphometric evaluations, using a measuring tape: thorax width, rump width, thorax depth, thorax perimeter, rump perimeter, leg perimeter, leg length, internal carcass length, and carcass length [
16]. The right half carcasses were sectioned into six primal cuts, determining the weight and yield of the primal cuts, as follows: Neck (separated from the head at its lower extremity, between the last cervical vertebra and the first thoracic vertebra); Shoulder (obtained by the section of the axillary region, by the cut of the tissues that bind the scapula and the humerus to the thoracic region of the carcass); Loineye (obtained by two cuts, one between the last thoracic vertebra and the first lumbar, and another between the last lumbar and the first sacral); Rib (resulted from two cuts, the first between the last cervical vertebra and the first thoracic vertebra and the first lumbar); Leg (separated from the carcass at its upper extremity, between the last lumbar and the first sacral). As the primal cuts were removed from the carcasses, they were immediately weighed [
17].
Subjective evaluations included carcass conformation, carcass fat cover, and kidney fat coverage. Internal fat was considered to be the pelvic fat (surrounding kidneys and pelvic cavity) and the fat enveloping the gastrointestinal tract (omental and mesenteric fat). Carcass conformation was assessed based on the shape of the leg, rump, loin, and shoulder musculature, while carcass fat cover referred to the thickness and distribution of subcutaneous fat. These parameters were scored using a 5-point scale (1 = denotes the least fat to 5 = denotes the most fat), with 0.5-point intervals [
15]. Kidney fat coverage was evaluated on a 3-point scale: 1 = exposed kidneys, 2 = partially covered, and 3 = fully covered kidneys.
Carcasses were then split along the ischiopubic symphysis and the spinal midline [
18]. Internal body length (IBL) and leg length (LL) were measured following Cezar and Sousa [
16]. Based on these, the carcass compactness index (CCI = CCW/ICL) and leg compactness index (LCI = rump width/leg length) were calculated.
2.4.3. Meat Quality
Physicochemical parameters were evaluated using the Semimembranosus muscle obtained from the dissection of the left leg. The loin eye area (LEA) was evaluated in the Longissimus dorsi muscle by tracing its contour on transparent plastic. Maximum width (A) and depth (B) were measured, and the area was calculated using the formula: LEA = (A/2 × B/2) × π. Subcutaneous fat thickness over the 12th rib (KF) and overall subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT) were measured using a digital caliper [
19]. Measurements included ultimate pH (pH
a) and temperature, taken approximately 24 h postmortem, after carcass chilling at 4 °C. These parameters were recorded using a penetration pH meter equipped with a temperature probe (TESTO, model 205, Lenzkirch, Germany). Meat color was assessed with a digital colorimeter (Minolta, CR-400, Tokyo, Japan) using a 45°/0° viewing geometry and expressed in the CIE Lab system (L, a, b), where L indicates lightness, a* redness intensity, and b* yellowness intensity [
20]. Two readings were taken on each sample, and the mean was calculated. Samples were thawed overnight at 4 °C, and color readings were performed after 50 min of blooming at room temperature to allow myoglobin to oxygenate and form oxymyoglobin, the main pigment responsible for the bright red color of meat [
21].
The characteristics of the Longissimus lumborum muscle were evaluated based on visual and instrumental analyses, following methodologies adapted from Cezar and Sousa [
16], in accordance with international standards such as those used by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Meat Standards Australia (MSA). Marbling was assessed visually on a six-point scale, where 1 indicated absence and 5 represented highly abundant intramuscular fat, reflecting adaptations from the USDA marbling classification. Texture was scored from 1 to 5 based on visual granulation and tactile assessment, with 1 indicating very coarse and 5 representing very fine texture, in line with tenderness evaluation protocols such as the Warner–Bratzler Shear Force method. Meat color was initially classified visually into five categories, ranging from light pink to dark red. The a* value from the instrumental color analysis served as the primary index for objective categorization of meat redness, as proposed by Milovanovic et al. [
20].
To determine cooking loss (CL), two steaks (2.5 cm thick) were cut transversely to the muscle fibers of the Semimembranosus muscle [
22]. The steaks were thawed for 24 h in a refrigerator at 5 °C and weighed using a precision balance (SHIMADZU, TX3202L, Kyoto, Japan). They were then placed on a grill over a baking tray and roasted in an electric oven at 150 °C (FISCHER, Brusque, Santa Catarina, Brazil), until reaching 71 °C at the geometric center. Internal temperature was monitored with type-K thermocouples inserted into the center of the sample, and data were recorded with a digital reader (Comark, PK23M, Ipswich, UK). After cooking, the samples, trays, and grills were left at room temperature until the internal temperature of the steaks reached 24–25 °C, measured using a penetration thermometer (TESTO, model 106, Melrose, MA, USA). The steaks were weighed again, and cooking loss was calculated as the percentage of weight lost, according to the method described by Wheeler et al. [
23].
Texture was then evaluated using the Warner–Bratzler shear force (WBSF) test. The same samples used for cooking loss were left at room temperature, and at least three cores were extracted parallel to the muscle fibers using a cylindrical sampler (1.27 cm diameter). Each core was sheared perpendicularly using a Warner–Bratzler blade attached to a texture analyzer (G-R MANUFACTURING Co., Model 3000TAXT2, Stable Micro Systems, Godalming, UK), equipped with a 25 kgf load cell and a crosshead speed of 20 cm/min, following Wheeler et al. [
24]. The mean of the readings was used to represent the shear force of each steak, expressed in kgf/cm
2 [
24].
For chemical composition analysis, the Semimembranosus muscle from each animal was cleaned of connective tissue, homogenized using a household blender, and analyzed for moisture, ash, fat, and crude protein contents following AOAC [
25] procedures.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
The experimental design followed a completely randomized 2 × 2 factorial scheme (two sexes and two ages), comprising 16 males (eight slaughtered at 70 days and eight at 100 days) and 16 females (eight slaughtered at 70 days and eight at 100 days). Based on a power analysis and the standard deviation of the measurements, the study achieved a statistical power of 0.915 for detecting a 5% difference between treatments. All data were initially tested for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Once assumptions were verified, the data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA), and treatment means were compared using Tukey’s test at a 5% significance level. Statistical analyses were conducted using the MIXED procedure available in the SAS OnDemand software (version 9.4).
3. Results
The weights and yields of non-carcass components in goats of different sexes and slaughter ages showed a significant interaction (
p < 0.05) for liver weight (
Table 3). There was a significant difference (
p < 0.05) between sexes for blood (
p = 0.0014) and feet (
p = 0.001) weights, with high-er values observed in males. Regarding slaughter age, significant effects were found for the following components: blood (
p < 0.0001), skin (
p < 0.0001), head (
p < 0.0001), liver (
p = 0.014), feet (
p = 0.001), diaphragm (
p = 0.001), esophagus (
p = 0.001), kidneys (
p < 0.0001), tail (
p = 0.001), and buchada yield (
p = 0.006).
Regarding carcass traits, no significant effects (
p > 0.05) were observed for the interaction between sex and age, nor for sex alone. However, total weight gain (
p < 0.0001), slaughter (
p < 0.0001) and empty (
p < 0.0001) body weight, hot (
p < 0.0001) and cold carcass (
p < 0.0001) weights, loin eye area (
p < 0.0001), GR (
p = 0.001), IFP (
p = 0.015), CCI (kg cm
−1) (
p < 0.0001), CCI (cm
2) (
p = 0.003), conformation (
p = 0.005), carcass fat cover (
p = 0.001), kidney fat (
p < 0.0001), texture (
p < 0.0001) and color (
p < 0.0001) were significantly influenced by slaughter age (
Table 4).
The variables internal length (
p = 0.001), leg length (
p < 0.0001), rump width (
p < 0.0001), thigh perimeter (
p < 0.0001), rump perimeter (
p < 0.0001), thoracic perimeter (
p < 0.0001), thoracic depth (
p = 0.008) and internal thoracic depth (
p < 0.0001) showed significant differences according to age (
Table 5).
Commercial cut weights and yields showed no interaction between sex and age (
p > 0.05). No significant effect (
p > 0.05) of sex was observed for any of the cuts (
Table 6). However, neck (
p < 0.0001), shoulder (
p < 0.0001), ribs (
p < 0.0001), loin (
p < 0.0001), leg (
p < 0.0001) cuts, and cuts yield shoulder (
p = 0.001) and leg (
p = 0.007) were significantly affected by slaughter age (
Table 6).
Tissue composition of the leg showed no interaction between sex and age (
p > 0.05). Bone content (
p = 0.003) and muscle-to-bone ratio (
p = 0.028) were influenced by the sex effect. Other traits, such as leg weight before (
p < 0.0001) and after dissection (
p < 0.0001), muscle (
p < 0.0001), bone (
p = 0.002), fat (
p = 0.045), and muscle-to-bone ratio (
p = 0.004) differed significantly with slaughter age (
Table 7).
The chemical composition of the Semimembranosus muscle was not affected by sex or age (
p > 0.05,
Table 8). However, brightness (
p = 0.020) and shear strength (
p = 0.023) showed significant interaction. Brightness differed between sexes (
p = 0.010)
5. Conclusions
Slaughter at 100 days proved to be more advantageous for muscle development, commercial yield, and the physicochemical attributes of the meat, without compromising tissue composition or palatability.
Beyond mere numerical differences between groups, the data reveal a pattern of physiological maturation that directly influences economic efficiency and adds value to the final product. These findings reaffirm the importance of decisions based on technical criteria to promote sustainability and enhance the goat meat value chain in tropical regions.
Thus, slaughtering kids at 100 days is recommended as an effective practice to optimize zootechnical and commercial outcomes, contributing to the strengthening of goat farming focused on high-quality meat production.
These insights reinforce the potential of early slaughter strategies to produce meat with desirable sensory characteristics, even without changes in physical texture or acidity parameters. Future studies may explore the role of genetics and nutrition on these outcomes, as well as establish correlations with sensory analyses to validate consumer perception.