Next Article in Journal
A Lightweight UAV-Mounted Metrology System for Standards-Aligned Metric Crack Width Measurement in Reinforced Concrete Bridges
Previous Article in Journal
Residual Stress Measurement in Diamond Burnished Aluminum Alloy: Challenges and a Numerical Solution Strategy Using Finite Element Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrated Framework for Robotic Performance Measurement and Analysis: A Software-Based Approach to Metrological Data Processing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Closing Editorial: Feature Papers Collection: Celebration of the First Impact Factor of Metrology

1
Manufacturing Processes and Systems (MAPS), Faculty of Engineering Technology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
2
Department of Mathematical Modelling and Data Analysis, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Abbestr. 2-12, 10587 Berlin, Germany
3
Manufacturing Metrology Team, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metrology 2026, 6(3), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology6030057
Submission received: 22 July 2026 / Accepted: 19 August 2026 / Published: 21 August 2026

1. Introduction and Summary

In 2025, Metrology (ISSN 2673-8244) received its first Impact Factor of 1.5, as published in the 2025 Edition of Journal Citation Reports® (Clarivate), released in June 2025.
To celebrate this wonderful achievement, we launched this Special Issue, aiming to publish top-quality papers from Editorial Board Members and leading researchers who have been invited to submit their work by the Editorial Team. As hoped and expected, the papers provide a flavor of the typical scope of our journal, reflecting both basic metrological problems and the application of basic metrological principles to practical issues.
In this brief editorial, we celebrate the successful conclusion of this Special Issue, which has attracted eight high-quality research contributions from leading international research groups. These articles collectively address the critical challenges and opportunities in the field of metrology, covering both fundamental research and practical applications, and demonstrate the strong engagement of our field with the broader scientific community.

2. An Overview of Published Articles

The contributions to this Special Issue encompass several thematic areas that represent both the current state of the art and emerging directions in metrology.

2.1. Characterization of Geometry: From Flat, Curved, Rough to Fully 3D Robot Analysis

A perfect flat is a basic geometry, and granite surface plates are aimed at approaching such a flat surface to form the basis of dimensional measurements in the workshop. The measurement of such plates is a classical dimensional measurement problem that was considered to be solved in the early 1990s [1,2], with as a loose end the classical Moody method [3], which is still in common use today. In his paper the Editor-in-Chief shows that improvement is possible using least-squares and minimum-zone principles, using a Monte-Carlo method for the uncertainty analysis, where bias effects can be observed. When surfaces are less flat and the geometry is described by curvature metrics [4], Malenkov et al., in their paper, show that for such a description of geometry a Monte Carlo-based uncertainty evaluation reveals bias effects as well, demonstrating high sensitivity to measurement errors. Local form deviations also provide the basis for roughness measurements, where averaging parameters like Sa and Sq are most common [5]. Modern digital analysis techniques have enabled the evaluation of a greater number of parameters. Moreau et al. identify the Sdr (“developed length”) parameter as being most sensitive to temporal changes on a surface. This parameter also has promising multi-scale characteristics [6], making it a welcome alternative to other, long-established parameters. Moving to larger scales, the metrological evaluation of robot performance is elaborated by Sabol et al. Based on ISO 9283 [7], the software solutions developed simplify the process of interpretation and reduce the need for additional external tools. Based on the obtained data, the robot’s performance can be evaluated in terms of pose accuracy and pose repeatability [8]. In addition, robot parameters can be monitored and evaluated over an extended period, allowing the proposed solution to be used in predictive maintenance.

2.2. The Value of Low-Cost Metrology Solutions

Low-cost metrology solutions can be of great value if applied thoughtfully. Rodrigues-Rama et al. demonstrate the potential of low-cost metrology solutions in encapsulated digital temperature sensors [9], where the calibration allows them to reduce the manufacturer’s specification of ± 0.5 °C to uncertainties within ± 0.2 °C. Bülau et al. develop a low-cost microwave resonator for exciting a diamond sample [10], enabling optically detected magnetic resonance and enhancing the portability of quantum sensors based on this technology [11].

2.3. Metrological Assessment of pHT

The total pH scale, represented by the pHT value, is an essential measure for ocean acidification. In order to closely monitor this climate change-related quantity, certified reference materials (CRMs) are urgently needed [12]. Quandera et al. contribute to this subject by characterizing Harned cells with artificial seawater of varying salinities and temperatures, thus characterizing the SI-traceable metrological standards for pHT characterization and thereby offering a practical tool for high-accuracy calibration in variable marine conditions.

2.4. Testing of Aged Glass Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastics

Although the domains of testing and metrology have been separate for a long time, Palacios Merono and Mertiny demonstrate that a concerted metrology-based approach to testing, combined with machine learning, provides a solid basis for assessing mechanical degradation in fiber-enforced thermoplastics [13]. Taking the metrological properties into account, mass change metrology [14], tensile testing [15], and acoustic emission technologies supported by machine learning [16] were employed, and the results were confirmed by optical microscopy.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Bülau, A.; Walter, D.; Kofoed, M.; Janek, F.; Kible, V.; Fritz, K.-P. A Highly Efficient, Low-Cost Microwave Resonator for Exciting a Diamond Sample from a Miniaturized Quantum Magnetometer. Metrology 2025, 5, 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology5040069.
  • Haitjema, H. Moody Revisited: Least-Squares Solutions of the Union Jack Surface Plate Measurement Method. Metrology 2026, 6, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology6020027.
  • Malakhov, D.; Kelemenová, T.; Kelemen, M. Uncertainty Propagation in Curvature-Based Surface Form Metrology: A Monte Carlo and Differential Geometry Approach. Metrology 2026, 6, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology6020043.
  • Moreau, C.; Lemesle, J.; Berkmans, F.; Páez Margarit, D.; Carlier, T.; Blateyron, F.; Bigerelle, M. Sdr as a Key Roughness Parameter for Monitoring the Temporal Stability of Measuring Instruments: Short- and Extended-Time Uncertainties. Metrology 2026, 6, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology6010010.
  • Palacios Moreno, J.; Mertiny, P. Acoustic Emission and Machine Learning Approaches for Assessing Mechanical Degradation in Aged Unidirectional Glass Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastics. Metrology 2026, 6, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology6010011.
  • Quendera, R.; Nunes, M.J.; Fernando, A.L.; Palma, C.; Moura, S.; Pellegrino, O.; Alves e Sousa, J. Metrological Assessment of pHT in TRIS Buffers Within Artificial Seawater: Implications for High-Salinity Reference Materials. Metrology 2026, 6, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology6010006.
  • Rodríguez-Rama, J.A.; Presa Madrigal, L.; Marín Lázaro, A.; Maroto Lorenzo, J.; García Laso, A.; Costafreda Mustelier, J.L.; Martín-Sánchez, D.A. Metrological Validation of Low-Cost DS18B20 Digital Temperature Sensors Using the TH-001 Procedure: Calibration Models, Uncertainty, and Reproducibility. Metrology 2026, 6, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology6010021.
  • Sabol, M.; Semjon, J.; Jánoš, R.; Málik, M.; Svetlík, J.; Ondočko, Š. Integrated Framework for Robotic Performance Measurement and Analysis: A Software-Based Approach to Metrological Data Processing. Metrology 2026, 6, 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology6030046.

References

  1. Meijer, J. Accuracy of Surface Plate Measurements—General Purpose Software for Flatness Measurement. Ann. CIRP 1990, 39, 545–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Haitjema, H.; Meijer, J. Evaluation of surface plate flatness measurements. Eur. J. Mech. Eng. 1993, 38, 165–172. [Google Scholar]
  3. Moody, J.C. How to calibrate surface plates in the plant. Tool Eng. 1955, 1955, 15–21. [Google Scholar]
  4. Carmo, M.P.D. Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces: Revised and Updated Second Edition; Courier Dover Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. ISO 25178-2; Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Areal—Part 2: Terms, Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
  6. Goïc, G.L.; Bigerelle, M.; Samper, S.; Favrelière, H.; Pillet, M. Multiscale Roughness Analysis of Engineering Surfaces: A Comparison of Methods for the Investigation of Functional Correlations. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2016, 66, 437–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. ISO 9283; Manipulating Industrial Robots—Performance Criteria and Related Test Methods. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
  8. Joubair, A.; Bonev, I.A. Accuracy Analysis and Improvement of Industrial Robots. Ind. Robot 2015, 42, 526–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Abdinoor, J.A.; Hashim, Z.K.; Horváth, B.; Zsebő, S.; Stencinger, D.; Hegedüs, G.; Bede, L.; Ijaz, A.; Kulmány, I.M. Performance of Low-Cost Air Temperature Sensors and Applied Calibration Techniques—A Systematic Review. Atmosphere 2025, 16, 842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Ma, Z.; Zheng, D.; Fu, Y.; Yuan, H.; Guo, W.; Zhao, J.; Li, B.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J. Efficient microwave radiation using broadened-bandwidth coplanar waveguide resonator on assembly of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 58, 50919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Liu, Q.; Xie, F.; Peng, X.; Hu, Y.; Wang, N.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Chen, H.; Cheng, J.; et al. Millimeter-Scale Temperature Self-Calibrated Diamond-Based Quantum Sensor for High-Precision Current Sensing. Adv. Quantum Tech. 2023, 6, 2300210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Feistel, R.; Wielgosz, R.; Bell, S.A.; Camões, M.F.; Cooper, J.R.; Dexter, P.; Dickson, A.G.; Fisicaro, P.; Harvey, A.H.; Heinonen, M.; et al. Metrological challenges for measurements of key climatological observables: Oceanic salinity and pH, and atmospheric humidity. Part 1: Overview. Metrologia 2015, 53, R1–R11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Nikforooz, M.; Montesano, J.; Golzar, M.; Shokrieh, M.M. Assessment of the thermomechanical performance of continuous glass fiber reinforced thermoplastic laminates. Polym. Test. 2018, 67, 457–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. ASTM D5229M-20; Standard Test Method for Moisture Absorption Properties and Equilibrium Conditioning of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2020.
  15. ASTM D2343-17; Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Glass Fiber Strands, Yarns, and Rovings Used in Reinforced Plastics. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2009.
  16. Almeida, R.S.M.; Magalhães, M.D.; Karim, M.N.; Tushtev, K.; Rezwan, K. Identifying damage mechanisms of composites by acoustic emission and supervised machine learning. Mater. Des. 2023, 227, 111745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Haitjema, H.; Bär, M.; Piano, S. Closing Editorial: Feature Papers Collection: Celebration of the First Impact Factor of Metrology. Metrology 2026, 6, 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology6030057

AMA Style

Haitjema H, Bär M, Piano S. Closing Editorial: Feature Papers Collection: Celebration of the First Impact Factor of Metrology. Metrology. 2026; 6(3):57. https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology6030057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Haitjema, Han, Markus Bär, and Samanta Piano. 2026. "Closing Editorial: Feature Papers Collection: Celebration of the First Impact Factor of Metrology" Metrology 6, no. 3: 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology6030057

APA Style

Haitjema, H., Bär, M., & Piano, S. (2026). Closing Editorial: Feature Papers Collection: Celebration of the First Impact Factor of Metrology. Metrology, 6(3), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/metrology6030057

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop