Next Article in Journal
Electrifying Transport: Assessing the Air Quality and Policy Implications of Battery Electric vs. Plug-In Hybrid Vehicles
Next Article in Special Issue
Quantization of Faster R-CNN
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Performance Assessment of an Automated Shuttle in a Complex, Public Road Environment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phase Response Error Analysis in Dynamic Testing of Electric Drivetrains: Effects of Measurement Parameters

by
Zoltán Gábor Gazdagh
* and
Balázs Vehovszky
Department of Whole Vehicle Engineering, Széchenyi István University, Egyetem tér 1, H-9026 Győr, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Future Transp. 2025, 5(4), 166; https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp5040166
Submission received: 10 October 2025 / Revised: 31 October 2025 / Accepted: 4 November 2025 / Published: 6 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Future of Vehicles (FoV2025))

Abstract

The development of NVH (Noise, Vibration, and Harshness) characteristics in vehicles is facing new challenges with the widespread utilization of electric drivetrains. This shift introduces new requirements in several areas, such as reduced noise and vibration levels, the need for advanced nonlinear characterization methods, and tuning/masking the typically more prominent tonal noise components. More accurate simulation and measurement techniques are essential to meet these demands. This study focuses on the experimental frequency response function (FRF) testing of electric drivetrain components, specifically on potential phase errors caused by inappropriate measurement settings. The influencing parameters and their quantitative effects are analyzed theoretically and demonstrated using real measurement data. A novel numerical approach, termed Maximum Phase Error Analysis (MPEA), is introduced to systematically quantify the largest potential phase errors due to arbitrary alignment between resonance frequencies and discrete spectral lines. MPEA enhances the robustness of phase accuracy assessment, especially critical for lightly damped systems and closely spaced resonance peaks. Based on the findings, optimal testing parameters are proposed to ensure phase errors remain within a predefined limit. The results can be applied in various dynamic testing scenarios, including durability testing and rattling analysis.
Keywords: electric drivetrain; dynamic testing; FRF; phase error; amplitude error electric drivetrain; dynamic testing; FRF; phase error; amplitude error

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gazdagh, Z.G.; Vehovszky, B. Phase Response Error Analysis in Dynamic Testing of Electric Drivetrains: Effects of Measurement Parameters. Future Transp. 2025, 5, 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp5040166

AMA Style

Gazdagh ZG, Vehovszky B. Phase Response Error Analysis in Dynamic Testing of Electric Drivetrains: Effects of Measurement Parameters. Future Transportation. 2025; 5(4):166. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp5040166

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gazdagh, Zoltán Gábor, and Balázs Vehovszky. 2025. "Phase Response Error Analysis in Dynamic Testing of Electric Drivetrains: Effects of Measurement Parameters" Future Transportation 5, no. 4: 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp5040166

APA Style

Gazdagh, Z. G., & Vehovszky, B. (2025). Phase Response Error Analysis in Dynamic Testing of Electric Drivetrains: Effects of Measurement Parameters. Future Transportation, 5(4), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp5040166

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop