Next Article in Journal
Early Selection of Popcorn Lines for Tolerance to Salt Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Analysis of Amino Acid Permease Gene Family in Solanum lycopersicum and Expression Profiling Under Drought Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Proposed Epigenetic Regulatory Frameworks at the Plant–Microbiome Interface Under Cadmium Stress

Soil Science and Plant Nutrition Department, Agriculture Faculty, Harran University, Sanliurfa 63200, Turkey
Stresses 2026, 6(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses6010008
Submission received: 27 January 2026 / Revised: 14 February 2026 / Accepted: 17 February 2026 / Published: 19 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Topic Effect of Heavy Metals on Plants, 2nd Volume)

Abstract

Cadmium (Cd) contamination of agricultural soils threatens crop productivity and food safety by disrupting physiological and molecular processes in plants. Increasing evidence indicates that epigenetic regulation, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and emerging epitranscriptomic marks such as RNA methylation, plays a crucial role in coordinating plant responses to Cd stress. In parallel, plant-associated microbiomes have emerged as influential modulators of metal uptake, antioxidant capacity, hormone signaling, and stress resilience. Yet the mechanisms by which microbiome-derived signals intersect with host chromatin and transcriptome regulation under Cd exposure remain poorly understood. This review synthesizes current knowledge on plant epigenetic responses to Cd stress and critically examines how microbial metabolites, phytohormones, and redox-active compounds shape plant regulatory networks. Network-based ecological studies reveal that increased microbial community complexity and cooperative interactions are consistently associated with reduced Cd accumulation and enhanced plant performance, suggesting that microbial organization itself may represent an additional regulatory layer influencing plant responses. Despite compelling conceptual links, direct experimental evidence connecting microbiome signals to stable epigenetic or epitranscriptomic reprogramming under Cd stress remains limited. To date, only limited experimental studies have demonstrated causal relationships between microbial cues and host DNA or RNA methylation dynamics in Cd-exposed plants, highlighting clear mechanistic potential while also underscoring remaining knowledge gaps. By integrating physiological, ecological, and chromatin-level perspectives, this review identifies key unanswered questions and outlines future research directions to establish causal links between microbial community dynamics, epigenetic regulation, and long-term Cd stress adaptation in plants.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cadmium (Cd) is one of the most toxic and persistent metal pollutants affecting agricultural soils worldwide. Unlike essential mineral nutrients, Cd has no known biological function in plants and primarily enters terrestrial ecosystems through anthropogenic activities, including mining, metal processing, urban waste disposal, and the long-term use of phosphate fertilizers [1,2]. Due to its chemical similarity to essential divalent cations, including Zn2+ and Ca2+, Cd is readily taken up by plant roots and can be translocated to aerial tissues. As a result, crop plants represent a major entry pathway of Cd into the food chain, posing serious risks to food safety and human health [3,4].
Exposure to Cd disrupts multiple physiological and molecular processes in plants. Cadmium stress interferes with nutrient uptake, reduces photosynthetic efficiency, induces oxidative damage, and perturbs hormonal and redox signaling networks [5,6]. To cope with these effects, plants activate multiple defense mechanisms, including Cd2+ chelation, vesicular sequestration, and enhanced antioxidant defenses [7]. Although these responses mitigate Cd toxicity, growth inhibition and yield penalties are frequently observed under prolonged exposure in contaminated soils.
In recent years, epigenetic regulation has emerged as an important layer controlling plant responses to Cd stress. Changes in DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin structure, and small-RNA activity have been reported to influence gene expression patterns and contribute to stress adaptation processes [8,9]. Genome-wide and gene-specific analyses in rice, wheat, and Arabidopsis have demonstrated that Cd exposure induces locus-specific as well as global alterations in DNA methylation, influencing genes involved in metal transport, detoxification, and stress signaling pathways [10,11,12]. Importantly, some Cd-induced epigenetic modifications have been reported to persist across generations or to contribute to transgenerational epigenetic variation, suggesting a potential role in stress memory and heritable adaptation [13,14].
At the same time, increasing attention has been given to how Cd stress reshapes rhizosphere microbial communities and how plant-associated microbiota, in turn, influence plant performance under metal stress [15,16]. Numerous studies indicate that beneficial microbes can reduce Cd accumulation or restrict its translocation, enhance antioxidant defenses, and improve plant growth under contaminated conditions [17,18,19].
Despite these advances, epigenetic regulation and microbiome-mediated Cd tolerance have generally been addressed in parallel rather than in an integrated framework. Epigenetic research has mainly focused on plant-intrinsic mechanisms, often under controlled or sterile conditions, whereas microbiome studies have emphasized physiological, biochemical, and agronomic outcomes without explicitly addressing chromatin-level regulation in the host plant [9,18]. As a result, direct experimental evidence linking microbial signals to epigenetic reprogramming in plants exposed to Cd remains limited. Nevertheless, growing evidence indicates that microbial-derived phytohormones and redox-active metabolites modulate host hormonal balance and antioxidant systems [20,21,22], suggesting potential indirect links to chromatin-level regulation that remain to be experimentally verified.
Plant epigenetic research and plant–microbiome studies have expanded rapidly in recent years, yet their conceptual integration remains limited. While epigenetic analyses of cadmium stress are predominantly performed under sterile or simplified experimental systems, microbiome-based studies operate in ecologically complex environments but largely overlook chromatin-level regulation. This disconnect highlights a significant gap in interpreting how microbial cues influence transcriptional plasticity and stress memory under heavy metal stress.
Integrating epigenetic regulation into the plant–microbiome framework therefore represents an important conceptual challenge. Microbial signals that alter hormonal balance, redox status, and metabolic fluxes may indirectly shape chromatin states, thereby influencing transcriptional plasticity, stress memory, and long-term adaptation to Cd-contaminated environments. However, a unified framework connecting microbial activity to defined epigenetic modifications under Cd stress is still lacking.
Accordingly, this review synthesizes current knowledge on plant epigenetic responses to cadmium toxicity and microbiome-mediated modulation of plant stress physiology. By bringing these two research areas together, the review aims to identify emerging molecular connections, highlight critical knowledge gaps, and provide a conceptual basis for future studies exploring how microbial signals intersect with epigenetic regulation to shape plant adaptation under Cd stress.

2. Cadmium Stress-Induced Epigenetic Regulation in Plants

Cadmium exposure triggers significant transcriptional changes in plants. Transcription factors represent a key regulatory layer in Cd stress responses, with several families including WRKY, ERF, MYB, bHLH, and bZIP reported to play central roles in mediating plant resistance to Cd stress [23]. Transcriptomic evidence from the Cd hyperaccumulator Phytolacca acinosa shows that exogenous ABA affects the expression of metal transport, chelation, defense, and hormone-related genes under Cd stress [24]. However, transcriptional regulation alone may not fully account for the stability, reversibility, and potential heritability of Cd-induced stress responses.
Accumulating evidence indicates that epigenetic regulation plays a key role in modulating both immediate stress responses and longer-term adaptive processes under Cd exposure. These regulatory processes include dynamic changes in DNA methylation, RNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin organization, and small-RNA-mediated pathways, which influence gene expression under Cd stress conditions [14,25].

2.1. DNA Methylation Dynamics Under Cadmium Stress

DNA methylation is a conserved epigenetic mechanism in plants that involves the addition of methyl groups to cytosine residues in DNA by DNA methylases [26]. This modification regulates gene expression and contributes to the reprogramming of transcription in response to environmental stresses [27]. In particular, stress-induced changes in DNA methylation may contribute to longer-term stress memory in plants [28].
Within the context of heavy metal toxicity, accumulating evidence indicates that DNA methylation participates in plant responses to Cd stress, contributing to the maintenance of genome integrity under Cd exposure [29] and influencing transcriptional regulation through stress-associated changes in gene methylation patterns [30]. Genome-wide single-base resolution analyses in rice demonstrated that Cd exposure induces widespread alterations in CG, CHG, and CHH methylation patterns, with more hypermethylated than hypomethylated regions detected across upstream, gene body, and downstream regions [10]. These differentially methylated regions were associated with transcriptional changes in genes involved in stress responses, metal transport, and transcriptional regulation, including OsIRO2, OsPR1b, and Os09g02214. Functional analyses using mutants defective in DNA methyltransferases revealed that MET1 and DRM2 are required to maintain appropriate expression of Cd-responsive genes, supporting a mechanistic link between DNA methylation and transcriptional regulation under Cd stress [10].
Consistent with these findings, Cd-induced DNA methylation levels increased in the Cd-hyperaccumulator Noccaea caerulescens Ganges, where Cd exposure led to higher CpG DNA methylation and upregulation of the DNA-methyltransferase gene MET1, contributing to the maintenance of genome integrity under Cd stress [29]. Gene-specific methylation analyses in wheat further demonstrated that Cd exposure alters DNA methylation and transcription of UGT-3, LTP-4, and PIP-1, with methylation changes correlating with gene expression related to detoxification, membrane transport, and stress responses [30]. These studies support a role for DNA methylation-mediated transcriptional control in plant responses to Cd stress.
More refined mechanistic insight comes from recent work in rice showing that Cd stress dynamically regulates CHH methylation at a miniature inverted-repeat transposable element (MITE) located in the promoter region of OsGSTZ4. Cd exposure triggered rapid transcriptional induction of OsGSTZ4, followed by siRNA accumulation and CHH hypermethylation mediated through the RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway, specifically requiring OsDRM2 and OsRDR2 [31]. This study reveals an epigenetic feedback mechanism in which Cd-induced gene activation is subsequently modulated by siRNA-guided methylation, contributing to the regulation of transcriptional responses during Cd stress.
Importantly, Cd-induced DNA methylation changes can persist across generations. Analysis of heavy-metal-treated rice and its successive generations demonstrated that Cd exposure induces CHG hypomethylation at specific loci, and that these epigenetic modifications are heritable through both maternal and paternal germlines [32]. Progeny of stressed plants exhibited enhanced tolerance to the same stress encountered by their parents, supporting the notion that environmentally induced DNA methylation changes may contribute to the transgenerational inheritance of Cd tolerance traits
Collectively, these studies establish DNA methylation as a dynamic and functionally relevant regulatory layer in plant responses to cadmium stress, operating at both genome-wide and locus-specific levels. By modulating the expression of stress-responsive, detoxification-related, and regulatory genes, including OsIRO2, OsPR1b, Os09g02214, UGT-3, LTP-4, PIP-1, and OsGSTZ4, through canonical DNA methyltransferases (MET1, DRM2) and RNA-directed DNA methylation pathways (OsDRM2, OsRDR2), DNA methylation contributes not only to immediate stress acclimation but also to longer-term adaptive potential, including transgenerational inheritance of Cd tolerance traits.

2.2. Histone Modifications and Chromatin Remodeling

Histone modifications constitute a central epigenetic mechanism regulating gene expression in response to abiotic stresses. Post-translational modifications of histone tails, including acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and sumoylation, play key roles in transcriptional regulation and plant stress tolerance [33]. These chromatin changes are tightly coordinated with transcription factor activity via histone-modifying enzymes and chromatin-associated cofactors, whose activity, stability, and chromatin recruitment are themselves regulated by post-translational modifications, particularly phosphorylation [34]. Within this regulatory framework, post-translational modifications, particularly phosphorylation, function as critical modulators of histone-modifying enzymes, thereby fine-tuning transcriptional responses to environmental and developmental cues.
Consistent with this concept, Cd exposure significantly alters plant gene regulation by modifying histone marks and chromatin organization. In Pakchoi, Xiang et al. [35] reported that Cd treatment disrupts nucleolus organization, decondenses 45S rDNA chromatin, and increases transcription from the 5′ external transcribed spacer (ETS) region. These structural changes were accompanied by genome-wide alterations in histone acetylation and methylation, including elevated H3K9ac, H4K5ac, and H3K9me2 levels at the 45S rDNA promoter. Site-specific DNA hypomethylation within the promoter region was also associated with activation of rDNA transcription, suggesting a mechanistic link between chromatin remodeling, epigenetic modification, and nucleolar integrity under Cd stress.
Cao et al. [36] investigated the interplay between reactive oxygen species (ROS) and histone modifications in Cd-stressed Pakchoi seedlings. Cd-induced ROS accumulation was associated with chromatin decondensation and DNA damage, whereas low concentrations of epigenetic modification inhibitors enhanced histone acetylation and attenuated cell cycle arrest. These effects were associated with coordinated regulation of histone acetyltransferase and deacetylase gene expression, and antioxidant treatment further strengthened this protective response. Notably, high concentrations of the Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor Trichostatin A (TSA) increased ROS accumulation, suggesting a bidirectional interaction between chromatin state and oxidative stress under Cd exposure
In other plant systems, Gocek-Szczurtek et al. [37] showed that Cd exposure activates nuclear MAPKs and increases global DNA methylation (5-mC) levels, accompanied by pronounced alterations in histone modifications, including decreases in H3K4Me2, H3T45Ph, and H4K5Ac and increases in H3K9Ac and H3K56Ac. These changes were associated with chromatin condensation and transcriptional repression. Co-treatment with thyme oil stabilized MAPK activity, preserved chromatin organization, and prevented transcriptional silencing, highlighting its role in maintaining epigenetic stability under Cd stress.
Histone demethylases also contribute to Cd tolerance. Dong et al. [38] reported that SlJMJ18 and SlJMJ23 modulate Cd responses by influencing hormone synthesis pathways (BRs and ABA) and phenolic compound accumulation, whereas Li et al. [39] demonstrated that SlJMJ524 enhances Cd tolerance through regulation of the glutathione–phytochelatin (GSH–PC) detoxification pathway and flavonoid biosynthesis. These findings highlight the developmental stage- and gene-specific roles of histone demethylases in modulating plant responses to Cd toxicity.
Despite these advances, studies on chromatin accessibility and long-range regulatory interactions under Cd stress remain scarce. Research in Arabidopsis thaliana indicates that organ-specific accessible chromatin regions are strongly associated with active histone marks such as H3K4me3 at promoter sites, whereas many organ-unique accessible regions are located in distant intergenic regions and enriched for transcription factor binding motifs [40]. However, it remains unclear how Cd exposure affects these chromatin landscapes and whether long-range interactions contribute to tissue-specific stress responses, representing a critical gap for future investigation.
Cd stress induces dynamic histone modifications and chromatin remodeling, involving ROS signaling, MAPK activation, and developmental regulation. These epigenetic changes provide plants with flexible mechanisms to modulate gene expression, maintain cellular homeostasis, and enhance tolerance to cadmium toxicity.

2.3. Non-Coding RNAs in Cadmium-Responsive Gene Regulation

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) constitute a diverse class of regulatory transcripts that play important roles in gene expression control and genome stability in plants. Although lncRNAs can function in both nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments, the majority are enriched in the nucleus and are frequently associated with chromatin, where they act as regulators of transcriptional and epigenetic states [41]. Mechanistically, plant lncRNAs function as versatile cis- and trans-acting regulators, serving as molecular scaffolds that recruit chromatin-modifying complexes and regulate gene expression at multiple levels [42]. Recent high-throughput sequencing studies have revealed that lncRNAs can directly interact with chromatin, DNA, and nuclear proteins, thereby conditioning the epigenetic environment of target genes and modulating transcriptional regulation [43].
In the context of heavy metal stress, such regulatory versatility suggests that lncRNAs may act as integrative nodes linking stress-induced signaling pathways with chromatin-level modulation of gene expression.

2.3.1. MicroRNAs and Small RNAs in Cd Stress Responses

MiRNAs are ~21-nucleotide non-coding RNAs that function as key post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression and are involved in plant responses to metal toxicity [44]. In wheat, Qiu et al. [45] demonstrated that Cd exposure induces differential expression of five Cd-responsive miRNAs and their corresponding targets in both roots and leaves. Notably, miR398 was implicated in Cd-induced oxidative stress tolerance through regulation of its target gene encoding copper/zinc superoxide dismutase (CSD). Most miRNA–target pairs exhibited complex and tissue-specific regulatory patterns, suggesting that miRNAs participate in the mediation of Cd stress responses.
Similar regulatory patterns have been reported in other crops. In maize, Gao et al. [46] showed that Cd exposure induced differential expression of six candidate miRNAs and their targets in seedling roots. Expression changes were validated by qRT-PCR across different exposure times, and in situ hybridization further confirmed the spatial expression pattern of Zma-miR171b under Cd stress. In rice, Ding et al. [47] identified 19 Cd-responsive miRNAs through microarray profiling, with predicted target genes encoding transcription factors and stress-related proteins. Several miRNA–target pairs exhibited negative expression correlations under Cd stress. Promoter analyses further indicated that metal stress-responsive cis-elements tended to occur more frequently in the promoter regions of Cd-responsive miRNA genes, suggesting transcriptional regulation of miRNA expression in response to Cd exposure.
Functional studies further revealed that miRNAs can act as either positive or negative regulators of Cd tolerance. Ding et al. [48] demonstrated that miR268 is significantly induced by Cd stress in rice, leading to repression of its target gene NRAMP3, a metal transporter. Overexpression of miR268 inhibited seedling growth under Cd stress and resulted in increased Cd accumulation as well as elevated hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde levels, indicating enhanced oxidative stress. These findings demonstrate that excessive miR268 activity negatively affects Cd tolerance and underscore the importance of balanced miRNA regulation in determining plant sensitivity or resistance to Cd stress.
Beyond canonical miRNAs, broader small-RNA populations also contribute to Cd responses. Using small-RNA and degradome sequencing, Ma et al. [49] identified hundreds of sRNAs responsive to excessive Cd and Cu treatments, including DCL1-dependent and DCL2/3/4-dependent species. Several sRNAs originated from rRNA, tRNA, and Trans-acting siRNA (TAS) loci, and many were responsive to both Cu and Cd exposure, suggesting interactions between metal stress signaling pathways. Functional network analyses further indicated that sRNA–target interactions were associated with hormone–stress signaling pathways and reproductive processes, highlighting the regulatory diversity of sRNA-guided mechanisms under heavy metal stress.
Genotype- and tissue-specific regulation of small RNAs has also been linked to Cd accumulation traits. Liu et al. [50] compared high- and low-Cd-accumulating wheat cultivars and identified distinct small RNA expression profiles in roots and leaves following Cd treatment. Several differentially expressed miRNAs and their predicted targets were associated with cultivar-specific differences in Cd accumulation, suggesting a role for miRNA-mediated regulation in Cd accumulation processes. These miRNAs were proposed as potential biomarkers for screening low-Cd-accumulating wheat varieties.

2.3.2. Long Non-Coding RNAs in Cadmium-Responsive Transcriptional and Epigenetic Regulation

Beyond post-transcriptional regulation, lncRNAs may influence gene expression by associating with neighboring genes and modulating miRNA activity, thereby contributing to gene regulation under Cd stress. Strand-specific RNA sequencing in rapeseed revealed more than 5000 lncRNAs, among which 301 were responsive to Cd exposure [51]. Many Cd-responsive lncRNAs were associated with neighboring protein-coding genes involved in Cd uptake, translocation, and stress responses, suggesting possible cis-related regulatory effects. Importantly, some lncRNAs were identified as precursors of known miRNAs, while others functioned as endogenous target mimics (eTMs) capable of sequestering miRNAs. These findings suggest an interaction between lncRNAs and miRNAs under Cd stress.
Recent studies have provided functional validation of lncRNA-mediated regulation in Cd accumulation and related stress responses. In sweet sorghum, Lin et al. [52] identified Cd-responsive lncRNAs and investigated their putative cis- and trans-target genes, including genes involved in cell wall metabolism and metal chelation. Functional assays in protoplasts demonstrated that overexpression of specific lncRNAs upregulated their corresponding cis-target genes, such as SbYS1, which encodes a Cd chelate transporter. These findings suggest a positive regulatory role of certain lncRNAs in Cd accumulation and translocation. Similarly, in wheat, Zhu et al. [53] identified 10,044 novel lncRNAs in roots under Cd stress, including 69 cis-acting lncRNA–target pairs affecting the expression of genes involved in Cd transport and detoxification, photosynthesis, and antioxidant defense. Notably, overexpression of lncRNA37228, targeting a photosystem II protein D1 gene, enhanced Cd resistance in Arabidopsis, providing functional evidence for the regulatory role of lncRNAs in heavy metal stress responses.
Collectively, non-coding-RNA-mediated regulatory pathways appear to operate in close coordination with DNA methylation dynamics and histone modifications to fine-tune gene expression under cadmium stress. Small RNAs can indirectly influence chromatin states by modulating the expression of epigenetic regulators and stress-responsive transcription factors, thereby interfacing with DNA methylation- and histone-based control mechanisms described in Section 2.1 and Section 2.2. In parallel, accumulating evidence suggests that long non-coding RNAs contribute more directly to transcriptional and epigenetic regulation by acting as cis- or trans-regulatory elements, including molecular scaffolds or decoys, that influence the expression of neighboring genes and stress-responsive pathways at Cd-associated loci. Together, these interconnected regulatory layers form a multilayered network integrating transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and epigenetic control, thereby enhancing the capacity of plants to adapt to cadmium toxicity.

2.4. Epigenetic Stress Memory and Transgenerational Effects

An important yet still relatively underexplored dimension of Cd toxicity in plants concerns the potential establishment of epigenetic stress memory. Stress memory refers to the capacity of plants to retain information from prior stress exposure and to adjust subsequent responses either within the same generation or across generations, potentially involving epigenetic mechanisms [28]. In this review, the term “epigenetic stress memory” is used as a conceptual framework encompassing somatic, intergenerational, and transgenerational effects. In contrast, “transgenerational inheritance” is applied more specifically to situations in which stress-associated epigenetic modifications persist beyond the directly exposed generation and are transmitted to progeny, even without continued exposure to the original stress.
Mechanistically, processes such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin remodeling, and small-RNA-mediated pathways have been implicated in shaping plant stress adaptation and may contribute to memory-like effects [54,55]. Compared with other abiotic stresses, including drought and salinity, direct experimental evidence for stable epigenetic memory under Cd exposure remains limited. Nevertheless, available studies suggest that Cd stress may induce relatively stable epigenetic and transcriptional alterations, some of which may extend beyond the immediate stress period. Further research is required to determine the stability, reversibility, and potential heritability of these modifications.
In rice, Cong et al. [32] demonstrated that exposure to heavy metals, including Cd, induced locus-specific alterations in DNA methylation, predominantly manifested as CHG hypomethylation in both transposable elements and protein-coding genes. These CHG-demethylated states were transmitted through both maternal and paternal germlines and persisted for at least three successive generations. Importantly, progeny of stressed plants exhibited enhanced tolerance to the same stress conditions experienced by their progenitors, suggesting a potential association between heritable DNA methylation changes and stress-adaptive phenotypic responses. Cd exposure was also accompanied by altered expression of genes encoding DNA methyltransferases, DNA glycosylases, and the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling factor DDM1, indicating that core epigenetic regulators are likely involved in stress-associated epigenetic modifications linked to memory-like responses.
Evidence for transgenerational-plasticity-associated transcriptional memory in response to Cd exposure has also been reported in Thlaspi arvense. Li et al. [56] showed that maternal Cd exposure reduced growth and reproductive performance in the parental generation, whereas offspring maintained elevated superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity even under non-stress conditions. Transcriptome analysis identified 401 transcriptional memory genes (TMGs) that retained Cd-responsive expression patterns in the second generation despite the absence of Cd exposure. These TMGs were primarily associated with oxidative stress responses, cell wall biogenesis, and abscisic acid signaling pathways. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis further revealed that modules correlated with SOD activity were enriched in TMGs, and the SOD-encoding gene CSD2 was located within one such module. Several TMGs co-expressed with CSD2 were identified as hub genes, suggesting that transcriptional memory may contribute to the observed transgenerational plasticity under Cd stress. The major epigenetic, transcriptional, and non-coding-RNA-mediated responses to Cd stress reported across plant species are summarized in Table 1.
Together, these studies suggest that Cd exposure can be associated with heritable alterations in DNA methylation patterns and sustained changes in gene expression that extend beyond the directly exposed generation. Although the number of well-controlled studies remains limited and mechanistic causality has not yet been fully established, available evidence is consistent with the possibility that Cd-induced epigenetic modifications may contribute to stress memory-like phenomena. Future investigations integrating methylome, chromatin, and functional genetic analyses across multiple generations will be essential to clarify the stability, reversibility, and ecological relevance of these transgenerational effects.
Section 2 provides the mechanistic basis of plant epigenetic regulation under cadmium stress, highlighting how chromatin-level modifications contribute to transcriptional reprogramming and stress memory. However, epigenetic plasticity in plants does not operate in isolation and is increasingly recognized as being responsive to external biotic cues. In Cd-contaminated environments, microbial communities represent a major but underexplored source of regulatory signals capable of modulating plant epigenetic states. Despite accumulating evidence that microbial interactions influence plant stress physiology, a coherent conceptual framework linking microbiome-derived signals to defined epigenetic modifications under Cd stress is still lacking. Building on this epigenetic foundation, Section 3 explores the plant–microbiome interface as a critical regulatory layer shaping epigenetic and transcriptional responses to cadmium toxicity.

3. Epigenetic Regulatory Frameworks at the Plant–Microbiome Interface Under Cadmium Stress

3.1. Microbiome-Mediated Modulation of Plant Stress Physiology Under Cadmium Exposure

3.1.1. Regulation of Cadmium Uptake, Transport, and Compartmentalization

A substantial body of evidence demonstrates that beneficial rhizosphere and endophytic microorganisms consistently alleviate Cd-induced growth inhibition across diverse plant species and experimental systems. Microbial inoculation commonly results in improved seed germination, enhanced biomass accumulation, preservation of photosynthetic capacity, and reinforcement of antioxidant defenses under Cd stress. These outcomes collectively indicate that plant-associated microbes substantially influence plant stress physiology, rather than merely buffering acute toxicity.
One major mechanism underlying microbiome-mediated Cd tolerance involves the regulation of Cd uptake, translocation, and compartmentalization. Several studies report reduced Cd accumulation in shoots and edible tissues following microbial application, achieved through restricted root-to-shoot transport or decreased Cd bioavailability in the rhizosphere. For instance, pre-sowing seed treatment of wheat with the Cd-tolerant endophyte Bacillus subtilis 10-4 enhanced lignin deposition in roots under Cd stress, thereby reinforcing cell wall barrier properties and restricting Cd translocation to aerial tissues [57]. Similarly, soil supplementation with carbonate-containing metabolites produced by the ureolytic bacterium Ochrobactrum sp. POC9 reduced Cd bioavailability via microbially induced carbonate precipitation processes, leading to substantial decreases in Cd uptake in both shoots and roots of Petroselinum crispum grown in Cd-contaminated soil [58].
However, microbial mitigation of Cd toxicity cannot be fully explained by metal immobilization or exclusion alone. In several plant–microbe systems, growth promotion and physiological recovery under Cd stress occur even in the presence of sustained or dynamically altered Cd accumulation patterns. In Lycopersicon esculentum, inoculation with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia gladioli significantly improved biomass, photosynthetic pigment content, and metal tolerance indices under Cd exposure, despite increased Cd uptake and enhanced thiol-based chelation responses [59]. Gene expression analyses further revealed that microbial inoculation attenuated Cd-induced upregulation of metal transporter genes, indicating an active reprogramming of metal homeostasis rather than simple passive exclusion.
Such microbiome-driven modulation of cadmium uptake and translocation is increasingly viewed not only as a physiological adjustment but also as a potential upstream regulator of epigenetic plasticity. By reshaping intracellular metal burdens, redox balance, and stress signaling intensity, plant-associated microbes may indirectly influence chromatin organization and locus-specific DNA methylation dynamics. Altered cellular Cd thresholds may modulate the activation of stress-responsive transcription factors and chromatin remodelers, thereby affecting the recruitment or activity of DNA methyltransferases, demethylases, and histone-modifying enzymes. In this context, microbiome-mediated control of metal homeostasis may potentially contribute to priming-like processes that influence epigenetic responsiveness under chronic Cd exposure.

3.1.2. Transcriptional and Signaling Reprogramming Induced by Microbial Associations

Consistent with this regulatory perspective, Pseudomonas fluorescens treatment conferred pronounced Cd tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana by enhancing growth, chlorophyll content, and reproductive output under Cd stress. This protection was associated with the induction of the metal resistance gene AtPCR2, whose overexpression conferred resistance not only to Cd but also to additional heavy metals [60]. These results suggest that transcriptional modulation contributes to microbiome-mediated Cd tolerance, beyond effects on metal bioavailability alone.
These transcriptional and signaling adjustments may create a regulatory framework within which microbiome-induced cues could interact with epigenetic mechanisms, potentially contributing to sustained gene expression dynamics under cadmium exposure.

3.1.3. Antioxidant, Redox, and Phytohormone-Mediated Modulation of Cd Stress Responses

Microbial associations modulate multiple physiological layers of Cd stress responses, including redox-related metabolism and phytohormone signaling. In Lycopersicon esculentum, inoculation with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia gladioli enhanced growth performance and photosynthetic pigment content under Cd exposure while increasing protein- and non-protein-bound thiol levels and modulating metal transporter gene expression [59]. These findings indicate that microbial inoculation can reshape metal chelation capacity and transporter regulation under Cd stress.
In cauliflower, application of Cd-tolerant bacterial consortia together with foliar jasmonic acid enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities, including superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, and polyphenol oxidase, while simultaneously improving shoot and root growth and reducing Cd accumulation in plant tissues [61]. Similarly, inoculation with the abscisic acid-producing bacterium Azospirillum brasilense elevated endogenous ABA levels, suppressed the expression of the metal transporter genes IRT1 and IRT2, increased soil pH, and decreased bioavailable heavy metal pools, resulting in reduced Cd accumulation and substantial biomass gains across different soil types [62].
Given the sensitivity of DNA methylation, histone modification, and chromatin remodeling processes to redox and hormonal states, microbiome-mediated regulation of antioxidant and phytohormone pathways represents a plausible route through which microbial signals could shape epigenetic responses to cadmium stress.
Collectively, current studies demonstrate that plant-associated microbiomes substantially reprogram plant stress physiology under cadmium exposure through coordinated effects on metal transport, antioxidant capacity, and phytohormone signaling. Although these responses have primarily been characterized at physiological and transcriptional levels, their systemic integration and regulatory complexity suggest the possible involvement of higher-order regulatory mechanisms. This provides a conceptual foundation for exploring epigenetic processes as potential mediators of microbiome-driven plant adaptation under cadmium stress, which is examined in the subsequent sections.

3.2. Microbiome-Derived Signals as Potential Modulators of Plant Epigenetic States Under Cd Stress

Cadmium stress induces extensive physiological and molecular reprogramming in plants, and growing evidence indicates that these responses are strongly influenced by rhizosphere and endophytic microorganisms. Beneficial microbes mitigate Cd toxicity through the production of phytohormones, organic acids, redox-active metabolites, and signaling molecules that regulate metal uptake, antioxidant capacity, and stress-responsive gene expression. While most available studies focus on transcriptional and metabolic outputs, the biochemical identity of these microbial signals, particularly those linked to acetyl-CoA metabolism, redox balance, and phytohormone signaling, suggests a plausible involvement of chromatin-level regulation as an additional layer of control.
From an epigenetic standpoint, the available evidence can be broadly categorized into direct and indirect microbiome-mediated regulatory modes. Direct evidence involves microbial signals that engage established chromatin-modifying pathways, such as histone acetylation or methylation, whereas indirect evidence reflects microbiome-driven modulation of phytohormone signaling, redox balance, and primary metabolism that secondarily shapes the epigenetic landscape under cadmium stress. Recent reviews highlight that heavy metal stress, including cadmium exposure, is frequently associated with changes in DNA methylation patterns, histone modifications, chromatin dynamics, and small-RNA-mediated regulation in plants, underscoring the emerging role of epigenetic mechanisms in plant adaptation to metal toxicity [14].
Beyond the classification of direct and indirect regulatory modes, quantitative analyses of microbial community topology provide additional insights into how microbial assemblages may influence host regulatory networks. Co-occurrence networks constructed from microbial communities in heavy-metal-polluted soils frequently exhibit distinct network properties, including altered node degree distribution, increased modularity, and shifts in keystone taxa, compared with networks in less contaminated environments. For example, heavy metal contamination has been shown to strengthen network complexity and modular structure, while simultaneously weakening positive interactions among keystone taxa and altering community composition [63]. These findings suggest that heavy metal stress reshapes microbial network topology in ways that reflect adaptive reorganization but may also influence community stability and functional capacity under contaminated conditions.
Such quantitative network characteristics may influence the consistency and intensity of microbial biochemical signaling to the plant host, thereby shaping hormonal, redox, and metabolic cues that are known to interact with chromatin regulators. Although direct mechanistic links between specific network metrics and host epigenetic outcomes remain limited, integrating microbial network topology with multi-omic host profiling is a promising frontier for understanding how community structure mediates systemic regulatory responses to cadmium stress.
Comparative insights from hyperaccumulator species such as Pteris vittata broaden the cross-species perspective of microbiome–metal–host interactions under cadmium stress. Although traditionally recognized as an arsenic hyperaccumulator, recent work demonstrates that P. vittata also exhibits distinct patterns of cadmium uptake and translocation dynamics under single and combined As–Cd exposure conditions, accompanied by shifts in rhizosphere microbial community composition and diversity [64]. These coordinated metal–microbiome interactions highlight hyperaccumulator systems as valuable comparative models for examining how metal exposure shapes host physiological and regulatory adjustments. While direct evidence linking hyperaccumulator-associated microbiomes to defined chromatin modifications remains limited, such systems provide a promising framework for exploring whether specialized microbial assemblages correlate with sustained transcriptional and regulatory plasticity under cadmium stress.
Microbial modulation of jasmonic acid (JA) signaling represents a well-defined example of such regulation. Zhu et al. [65] demonstrated that the acetic acid–producing endophytic bacterium Lysinibacillus fusiformis Cr33 significantly reduced Cd accumulation in tomato plants, particularly by limiting root Cd uptake, through activation of JA signaling. Bacterial inoculation increased endogenous JA levels, downregulated Fe uptake–related genes and suppressed Fe acquisition systems, and reduced nitric oxide (NO) production in Cd-exposed roots. Comparable effects were observed following exogenous application of acetic acid or JA, whereas chemical inhibition of JA biosynthesis markedly attenuated the bacterium-mediated alleviation of Cd toxicity. Collectively, these findings support acetic acid-mediated JA signaling as a central microbial mechanism regulating Cd uptake under stress conditions.
Importantly, JA signaling is not only a regulator of metal uptake but is also associated with chromatin-level control of gene expression. Vincent et al. [66] showed that in Arabidopsis thaliana, components of the JA pathway functionally interact with HISTONE DEACETYLASE 6 (HDA6), influencing genome-wide patterns of histone modifications, including histone H4 acetylation (H4ac) and the repressive mark H3K27me3. MeJA treatment and HDA6 mutation were associated with coordinated changes in H4ac enrichment and H3K27me3 distribution at stress-responsive loci, highlighting overlapping roles of JA signaling and HDA6 in modulating transcriptional programs. These findings suggest that microbial activation of JA signaling under Cd stress, as reported by Zhu et al. [65], may engage established epigenetic regulatory frameworks rather than acting solely through transient hormonal effects. This provides a plausible mechanistic bridge between microbe-derived metabolic signals, hormone perception, and chromatin-based regulation of stress-adaptive gene expression.
Microbe-derived short-chain fatty acids represent an additional signaling axis linking microbial metabolism to host physiological regulation. Xiao et al. [67] showed that flooding-induced enrichment of Clostridium species in rice rhizospheres was associated with butyric acid-mediated activation of the phenylpropanoid pathway, resulting in enhanced lignification and suberization of root tissues and reduced root-to-shoot Cd translocation. Although chromatin-level changes were not examined in this study, butyrate has been reported in plant systems to influence histone acetylation status through inhibition of histone deacetylase activity. These observations raise the possibility that microbially derived short-chain fatty acids may contribute not only to metabolic reprogramming but also to epigenetic modulation of stress-adaptive pathways. Supporting the reported epigenetic activity of butyrate, exogenous sodium butyrate treatment increased histone acetylation marks (H3K9ac, H3K14ac, and H3K27ac) and transcriptionally activated phenylpropanoid biosynthetic genes in Platycodon grandiflorus [68]. Sodium butyrate also promoted the accumulation of phenylpropanoid-derived polyphenolic compounds. Collectively, these findings suggest a plausible mechanistic framework in which microbially produced butyrate may influence histone acetylation states, thereby facilitating transcriptional activation of phenylpropanoid-associated pathways. Such epigenetically mediated metabolic reprogramming could, in principle, contribute to reinforcement of root structural barriers and restriction of Cd mobility, although direct evidence under Cd stress conditions remains to be established.
Microbial influences on plant redox homeostasis may provide indirect routes to epigenetic regulation. Fan et al. [69] reported that under combined elevated CO2 and Cd stress, Brassica napus exhibited significant shifts in rhizosphere microbial composition alongside enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities, increased glutathione and ascorbate levels, and altered expression of stress-responsive transcription factors. Upregulation of glutathione-related genes and heavy metal ATPases further supported improved detoxification capacity under coupled stress conditions. Although causal links between microbial shifts and redox regulation were not directly established, these coordinated changes highlight redox metabolism as a potential interface between environmental signals, microbial dynamics, and stress-responsive gene regulation.
Cellular redox state and primary metabolism are recognized regulators of epigenetic enzyme activity, as metabolic flux and redox balance influence chromatin-modifying processes in plants [70]. Moreover, epigenetic factors such as DNA methyltransferases and histone-modifying enzymes are sensitive to redox-dependent modifications and require metabolic intermediates, including acetyl-CoA and S-adenosyl-methionine, for chromatin modification reactions [71]. Together, these insights suggest that microbiome-associated shifts in plant redox status and metabolism under Cd stress may modulate the biochemical environment that supports chromatin remodeling processes.
Although direct evidence for microbe-induced epigenetic modifications under cadmium stress remains limited, studies under non-metal stress conditions have clearly demonstrated that microbial signals can induce stable epigenetic changes in plants, providing important mechanistic precedents. For example, Chen et al. [72] demonstrated that plant growth-promoting bacteria induce region-specific DNA methylation changes in roots that persist even after microbial elimination and are required for sustained transcriptional reprogramming and growth promotion. Similar microbiome-induced reprogramming of DNA methylation and stress-responsive gene expression has been reported under drought stress [73], and additional work under drought and salinity conditions confirms that beneficial microbes can reshape antioxidant systems and transcriptional networks even without persistent colonization [74]. These observations provide a conceptual framework for hypothesizing that, under cadmium stress, microbial signals may similarly contribute to epigenetic priming of stress-responsive pathways, although this possibility remains to be explicitly tested. Representative studies demonstrating how distinct microbial groups and strategies modulate Cd dynamics in the rhizosphere and plant tissues are summarized in Table 2.
Collectively, these findings suggest that microbiome-derived signals under cadmium stress are unlikely to function as direct epigenetic writers, but instead modulate the biochemical and signaling milieu in which chromatin regulation operates. By modulating phytohormone pathways, organic acid pools, and cellular redox balance, beneficial microbes may modulate histone acetylation, methylation, and chromatin accessibility during Cd stress. This emerging framework highlights a critical knowledge gap and underscores the need for integrative studies that directly link microbial signals to defined chromatin modifications and epigenetic priming under Cd stress.

3.3. Microbial Network Dynamics and the Potential for Epigenetic Plasticity in Cd-Stressed Plants

Beyond the presence or absence of individual microbial taxa, the organization and interaction structure of rhizosphere and endophytic microbial communities have emerged as a key correlate of plant performance under Cd stress. Network-based ecological analyses increasingly demonstrate that microbial connectivity, interaction strength, and cooperative structure are associated with reduced Cd accumulation and improved plant growth. These findings indicate that community-level microbial organization, rather than taxonomic composition alone, plays an important role in shaping plant responses to Cd exposure.
Evidence for this relationship is provided by network analyses in rice systems. Zheng et al. [75] showed that inoculation with the Cd-resistant endophytic bacterium Stenotrophomonas R5 markedly altered microbial network topology in both roots and shoots, leading to increased network complexity and connectivity. Importantly, higher network complexity was negatively correlated with plant Cd accumulation, suggesting that more interconnected microbial communities may contribute to reduced Cd uptake and translocation, potentially through synergistic plant–microbiome interactions.
Comparable patterns have been observed across plant species and ecotypes differing in Cd-handling strategies, although the functional implications of microbial network complexity appear context-dependent. Shao et al. [76] demonstrated that under Cd stress, the Cd-accumulating ecotype of Sedum alfredii harbored rhizosphere microbial networks with significantly higher network complexity and a greater number of positive associations compared to the non-accumulating ecotype. Network complexity was positively correlated with plant performance, and the accumulating ecotype exhibited greater biomass under Cd stress. In this hyperaccumulator system, increased microbial network complexity may reflect coordinated plant–microbiome adaptation supporting high Cd tolerance and accumulation capacity.
The relationship between rhizosphere microbial community structure and plant Cd responses is further modulated by stress intensity. Cheng et al. [77] demonstrated that rhizosphere microbial communities respond to increasing soil Cd concentrations in a non-linear, concentration-dependent manner. At moderate Cd levels, rhizosphere activity was associated with reduced dissolved Cd availability and partial recovery of ricebiomass, whereas high Cd concentrations led to diminished microbial diversity, altered community structure, and exacerbated Cd toxicity. These results indicate that the functional role of microbial communities can shift from protective to detrimental depending on Cd exposure levels, emphasizing the dynamic nature of plant–microbiome interactions under metal stress.
Host genotype also plays a significant role in shaping microbial network properties. In contrast to the hyperaccumulator model described above, Wang et al. [78] demonstrated that low-Cd-accumulating (LA) rice cultivars harbored rhizosphere microbial communities that were more diverse and highly interconnected than those associated with high-Cd-accumulating (HA) cultivars. In this agronomic context, enhanced microbial diversity and network connectivity in LA cultivars were associated with improved nutrient cycling, altered metabolite profiles, and reduced Cd uptake. These findings suggest that microbial network complexity may support either enhanced Cd tolerance and accumulation (as in hyperaccumulators) or reduced Cd uptake (as in crop cultivars), depending on species-specific physiological strategies and rhizosphere microecosystem context.
Although these studies consistently demonstrate associations between microbial network complexity and plant performance under Cd stress, they do not yet resolve the molecular mechanisms by which plants integrate microbially derived environmental signals. The structured organization of these communities implies exposure to coordinated biochemical environments shaped by microbial metabolism, metabolite exchange, and nutrient cycling. In plants, chromatin-based regulatory systems—including DNA methylation and histone modifications—are increasingly recognized as mechanisms enabling transcriptional plasticity and defense- and stress-related memory-like responses under recurrent environmental stimuli [28,79]. In parallel, reviews of plant growth-promoting microorganisms under abiotic stress conditions suggest that microbial interactions may intersect with phytohormone signaling and epigenetic modulation pathways, potentially contributing to stress-adaptive transcriptional responses [80]. Supporting the broader plausibility of epigenetically mediated metabolic plasticity, studies in endophytic fungi demonstrate that chromatin remodeling can activate secondary metabolic pathways and alter signaling capacities [81]. Within this framework, network-level microbial stability under Cd stress could plausibly facilitate epigenetic reinforcement of gene expression programs related to metal exclusion, detoxification, or transport regulation, even in the absence of direct chromatin-level evidence. While direct chromatin-level evidence under Cd–microbe co-regulation remains limited, the integration of microbial ecology and plant epigenetics provides a mechanistically coherent hypothesis that is schematically illustrated in Figure 1.

3.4. Microbiome-Mediated Epigenetic Regulation Under Cd Stress

As outlined in Section 3.2, microbiome-derived signals, including phytohormones, organic acids, and redox-modulating metabolites, provide multiple biochemical entry points through which plant epigenetic states could plausibly be influenced under Cd stress. Section 3.3 further demonstrated that these signals are not transient or isolated, but are embedded within structured and persistent microbial interaction networks that correlate strongly with plant performance, Cd accumulation, and stress resilience. Together, these observations raise a central mechanistic question: can microbiome-derived cues directly reprogram plant epigenetic or epitranscriptomic landscapes under Cd exposure, thereby contributing to sustained stress adaptation rather than short-term physiological buffering?
To date, direct experimental evidence addressing this question remains limited, but critically informative. Xu et al. [82] provided one of the clearest mechanistic demonstrations of microbiome-driven epigenetic reprogramming under Cd stress. Using rice and Solanum nigrum, the authors identified a cross-kingdom signaling cascade described as a “root ROS–microbial IAA–root DNA methylation” axis. Cd exposure triggered reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation in plant roots, which in turn stimulated indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) biosynthesis in associated plant growth-promoting bacteria. Microbe-derived IAA subsequently attenuated excessive root ROS levels and induced the expression of key components of the plant DNA methylation machinery, including MET1a/MET1b, DRM2, CMT2/CMT3, DDM1a/DDM1b, and ROS1. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing revealed increased global methylation levels in CG, CHG, and CHH contexts in inoculated roots, with differentially methylated regions enriched in hormone response and gene regulatory processes. Induced expression of DNA methylation-related genes involved both ROS-dependent (ROS1, DRM2, CMT3, DDM1a/b) and ROS-independent (MET1a/b, CMT2) components. These findings support a mechanistic connection between microbial metabolism and host epigenetic machinery under Cd stress (Figure 2A). While this study provides compelling mechanistic evidence in rice and S. nigrum, its broader applicability across plant species, microbial consortia, and soil systems remains to be determined.
At the RNA level, Han et al. [83] provided complementary evidence that plant-associated microbes can reshape epitranscriptomic regulation during Cd exposure. In soybean, rhizobial symbiosis largely alleviated Cd-induced root growth inhibition without significantly altering root Cd concentrations, indicating that microbial protection was not primarily driven by metal exclusion. Transcriptome-wide profiling of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation revealed that Cd stress broadly increased m6A deposition, whereas rhizobial association reprogrammed m6A patterns on transcripts involved in hormone signaling, ROS homeostasis, MAPK cascades, and abiotic stress responses. Integration of m6A methylome and transcriptome datasets identified gene subsets whose RNA methylation status and expression levels were coordinately altered under Cd stress in the presence of rhizobia, supporting the conclusion that microbial symbiosis is associated with modulation of post-transcriptional regulatory layers during heavy metal stress (Figure 2B).
Beyond the two studies discussed above, direct experimental evidence linking plant-associated microbes to stable epigenetic or epitranscriptomic reprogramming under Cd stress remains scarce. Notably, this limitation reflects not a lack of microbiome influence on plant stress responses, but rather the current methodological gap between well-documented microbiome-driven modulation of phytohormone signaling, redox balance, and microbial network structure (Section 3.2 and Section 3.3) and chromatin- or RNA-level regulatory readouts. Thus, microbiome-mediated epigenetic regulation under Cd stress is biochemically plausible and increasingly supported by targeted studies, yet remains insufficiently resolved at the molecular level.
On this basis, the available evidence supports a conceptual model in which microbiome-derived signals do not act as direct epigenetic “writers,” but rather function upstream by shaping the metabolic, hormonal, and redox environments that determine chromatin accessibility and epigenetic enzyme activity. Persistent exposure to microbial metabolites, hormones, and redox cues generated by stable microbial interaction networks may therefore facilitate epigenetic stabilization of stress-responsive transcriptional programs, potentially contributing to stress priming, memory formation, and long-term adaptive plasticity under chronic Cd exposure.
Consequently, microbiome-driven epigenetic and epitranscriptomic regulation under Cd stress represents an emerging research frontier. Addressing this gap will require integrative experimental frameworks that simultaneously resolve microbial community structure, interkingdom signaling molecules, and host chromatin- or RNA-level regulatory dynamics. Such approaches will be essential not only to establish causality, but also to determine whether microbiome-induced epigenetic modifications contribute to stressmemory, transgenerational inheritance, or durable adaptation in Cd-contaminated environments.

4. Future Perspectives

4.1. Fundamental Research Directions

Although significant progress has been made in understanding plant responses to Cd stress, the integration of plant–microbiome interactions with epigenetic regulation is still at an early stage. Existing studies clearly show that beneficial microorganisms strongly influence plant physiology under Cd exposure, and recent evidence suggests that plant-associated microbes may influence plant DNA and RNA methylation patterns under Cd stress. However, such mechanistic evidence is currently limited to a small number of experimental systems. The mechanistic links connecting microbial signals, epigenetic regulation, and long-lasting stress tolerance therefore remain poorly resolved at the level of causal and temporally stable regulatory mechanisms.
A major priority for future research is to clarify whether microbiome-induced epigenetic changes act as primary regulators of Cd tolerance or mainly function to stabilize and reinforce stress-induced transcriptional responses over time. Disentangling cause–effect relationships will require time-resolved analyses and tissue- or cell-specific epigenomic approaches, particularly in roots where Cd perception and microbial interactions are most active.
Another important research gap concerns the role of microbial community structure. Increasing evidence links complex and stable microbial networks to improved plant performance under Cd stress. However, it remains unclear whether persistent microbial community configurations actively shape plant epigenetic states through sustained and coordinated biochemical signaling. Integrating microbial network parameters (e.g., connectivity, modularity, and network stability) with host chromatin profiling may help determine whether long-term exposure to structured microbiomes contributes to stable epigenetic reprogramming in plants.
The potential involvement of plant-associated microbes in epigenetic stress memory and transgenerational inheritance also warrants further investigation. While Cd-induced DNA methylation changes and heritable tolerance traits have been reported, the contribution of the microbiome to the establishment or maintenance of these epigenetic marks across generations remains largely unexplored. Carefully designed multigenerational experiments that manipulate microbial communities will be essential to verify causal relationships and to determine whether microbiome-associated epigenetic modifications persist beyond the directly exposed generation.

4.2. Applied and Translational Research Directions

From an applied perspective, future strategies for managing Cd-contaminated soils may benefit from shifting the focus from metal exclusion alone toward enhancing regulatory resilience. Screening and selecting microbial strains or consortia with the potential to modulate host epigenetic and epitranscriptomic states could represent a complementary strategy for improving plant performance under chronic metal stress. Such approaches may support soil remediation and sustainable crop production in contaminated environments.
However, translating these concepts into agricultural practice will require rigorous validation under field conditions, long-term stability assessments of microbial–plant associations, and consideration of soil physicochemical variability and microbiome dynamics across environments.

5. Conclusions

Cadmium contamination remains a persistent challenge for agricultural sustainability, food safety, and ecosystem health. Extensive research has established that plants deploy complex physiological, molecular, and biochemical defense strategies to cope with Cd toxicity. In parallel, growing evidence indicates that epigenetic regulation plays an important role in shaping Cd-responsive gene expression, stress acclimation, and, in some cases, transgenerational stress memory. DNA methylation dynamics, histone modifications, chromatin remodeling, and small-RNA-mediated regulation collectively contribute to the plasticity of plant responses under Cd stress. At the same time, the plant-associated microbiome has emerged as a powerful modulator of Cd bioavailability, uptake, and toxicity. Beneficial microbes alleviate Cd stress through diverse mechanisms, including metal immobilization, modulation of phytohormone signaling, enhancement of antioxidant capacity, and metabolic reprogramming. However, most microbiome-focused studies have primarily emphasized physiological and agronomic outcomes, with limited consideration of chromatin-level regulation in the host plant. By synthesizing evidence from epigenetics and plant–microbiome research, this review highlights a critical conceptual gap: the lack of direct mechanistic links connecting microbial signals to epigenetic reprogramming under Cd stress. Although recent studies suggest that microbe-derived phytohormones, organic acids, redox-active metabolites, and signaling molecules can influence plant transcriptional networks, direct experimental evidence demonstrating stable, microbe-induced epigenetic modifications under Cd exposure remains limited. Nevertheless, accumulating indirect evidence supports a model in which microbiome-mediated modulation of hormonal balance, redox status, and metabolic fluxes creates a biochemical environment conducive to epigenetic regulation. Rather than acting as direct epigenetic writers, microbial cues are more likely to function upstream, by modulating cellular metabolism and signaling pathways that influence chromatin accessibility and transcriptional plasticity. By integrating these lines of evidence, this review proposes an integrated regulatory framework for microbiome–plant epigenetic interactions under cadmium stress, thereby linking microbial community dynamics, host chromatin regulation, and stress-adaptive outcomes into a coherent mechanistic continuum. This framework forms a conceptual closed loop in which Cd exposure reshapes the microbiome, microbiome-derived signals modulate plant metabolic and hormonal states, and these shifts condition epigenetic regulation that ultimately feeds back into stress tolerance and adaptive capacity. Such interactions may contribute to stress memory, adaptive potential, and long-term plant resilience in Cd-contaminated environments.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

The author expresses gratitude to Harran University for providing access to digital resources. This manuscript has been language-edited using AI tools solely to improve grammar, clarity, and fluency.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Haider, F.U.; Liqun, C.; Coulter, J.A.; Cheema, S.A.; Wu, J.; Zhang, R.; Wenjun, M.; Farooq, M. Cadmium toxicity in plants: Impacts and remediation strategies. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 211, 111887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Subašić, M.C.; Šamec, D.; Selović, A.K.; Karalija, E. Phytoremediation of cadmium polluted soils: Current status and approaches for enhancing. Soil Syst. 2022, 6, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Clemens, S. Toxic metal accumulation, responses to exposure and mechanisms of tolerance in plants. Biochimie 2006, 88, 1707–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Abbas, T.; Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Hannan, F.; Keller, C.; Al-Wabel, M.I.; Ok, Y.S. Cadmium minimization in wheat: A critical review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 130, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sun, X.; Zhang, L.; Gu, Y.; Wang, P.; Liu, H.; Qiang, L.; Huang, Q. Nutrient-element-mediated alleviation of cadmium stress in plants: Mechanistic insights and practical implications. Plants 2025, 14, 3081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, M.; Dong, C. Molecular mechanisms of cadmium stress resistance in vegetable crops. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 5812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Luo, P.; Wu, J.; Li, T.T.; Shi, P.; Ma, Q.; Di, D.W. An overview of the mechanisms through which plants regulate ROS homeostasis under cadmium stress. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Niekerk, L.A.; Carelse, M.F.; Bakare, O.O.; Mavumengwana, V.; Keyster, M.; Gokul, A. The relationship between cadmium toxicity and the modulation of epigenetic traits in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gao, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhao, C. Advances in epigenetic studies of plant cadmium stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 15, 1489155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Feng, S.J.; Liu, X.S.; Tao, H.; Tan, S.K.; Chu, S.S.; Oono, Y.; Zhang, X.D.; Chen, J.; Yang, Z.M. Variation of DNA methylation patterns associated with gene expression in rice (Oryza sativa) exposed to cadmium. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 2629–2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shafiq, S.; Zeb, Q.; Ali, A.; Sajjad, Y.; Nazir, R.; Widemann, E.; Liu, L. Lead, cadmium and zinc phytotoxicity alter DNA methylation levels to confer heavy metal tolerance in wheat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bruno, L.; Araniti, F.; Talarico, E.; Greco, E.; Muto, A.; Pacenza, M.; Chiappetta, A.; Bitonti, M.B. Transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis of the main stress-related pathways in the DNA methylation-defective ddc mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to cadmium. Plant Biosyst.-Int. J. Deal. all Asp. Plant Biol. 2025, 159, 1362–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ou, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, C.; Lin, X.; Zang, Q.; Zhuang, T.; Jiang, L.; von Wettstein, D.; Liu, B. Transgenerational inheritance of modified DNA methylation patterns and enhanced tolerance induced by heavy metal stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Greco, E.; Talarico, E.; Guarasci, F.; Camoli, M.; Palermo, A.M.; Zambelli, A.; Chiappetta, A.; Araniti, F.; Bruno, L. Epigenetic Mechanisms of Plant Adaptation to Cadmium and Heavy Metal Stress. Epigenomes 2025, 9, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Khalid, M.; Liu, X.; ur Rahman, S.; Rehman, A.; Zhao, C.; Li, X.; Yucheng, B.; Hui, N. Responses of microbial communities in rhizocompartments of king grass to phytoremediation of cadmium-contaminated soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 904, 167226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, B.; Wu, B.; Dong, Y.; Lin, H.; Liu, C. Endophyte inoculation enhanced microbial metabolic function in the rhizosphere benefiting cadmium phytoremediation by Phytolacca acinosa. Chemosphere 2023, 338, 139421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ullah, I.; Al-Johny, B.O.; Al-Ghamdi, K.M.; Al-Zahrani, H.A.; Anwar, Y.; Firoz, A.; Almatry, M.A.A. Endophytic bacteria isolated from Solanum nigrum L., alleviate cadmium (Cd) stress response by their antioxidant potentials, including SOD synthesis by sodA gene. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 174, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Manzoor, M.; Guan, D.X.; Ma, L.Q. Plant-microbiome interactions for enhanced crop production under cadmium stress: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 965, 178538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Paladines-Beltrán, G.M.; Venegas, N.A.; Suárez, J.C. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Enhance Antioxidant Defense Systems in Sugarcane Under Soil Cadmium Stress. Plants 2025, 14, 2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Halim, M.A.; Rahman, M.M.; Megharaj, M.; Naidu, R. Cadmium immobilization in the rhizosphere and plant cellular detoxification: Role of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria as a sustainable solution. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 13497–13529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, Q.; Li, Y.; Fu, L.; Wang, Z.; Pan, Y.; Li, X.; He, C.; Tu, C.; Zhan, F. AMF and UPB synergistically enhanced cadmium tolerance in maize via hormonal regulation, photosynthetic optimization, and antioxidant activation. Physiol. Plant. 2025, 177, e70661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, D.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, J.; Yi, Q. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the physiological responses and root organic acid secretion of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) under cadmium stress. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, H.; Lu, L. Transcription factors involved in plant responses to cadmium-induced oxidative stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1397289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Xie, Q.; Xu, W.; Wang, Q.; Yao, F.; Jiang, Y.; Cao, H.; Lin, W. Transcriptome and physiological analysis reveals the mechanism of abscisic acid in regulating cadmium uptake and accumulation in the hyperaccumulator Phytolacca acinose Roxb. Plants 2025, 14, 1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, L.; Li, X.; Liu, H.; He, F.; Li, M.; Long, R.; Wang, X.; Kang, J.; Yang, Q. Comprehensive analysis of epigenetic modifications in alfalfa under cadmium stress. J. Hazard. Mater. 2025, 482, 136545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tresas, T.; Isaioglou, I.; Roussis, A.; Haralampidis, K. A brief overview of the epigenetic regulatory mechanisms in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 4700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nishanth, J.B.; Gaddala, B.; Suji, S.; Fathima, P.R.; Premkumar, A.; Karavadi, B.; Kumar, R.S.A.S.; Iyyappan, J.; Dinakarkumar, Y. Epigenetic mechanisms regulating plant responses to abiotic stress and their role in developing climate resilient crops. Discov. Plants 2025, 2, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lämke, J.; Bäurle, I. Epigenetic and chromatin-based mechanisms in environmental stress adaptation and stress memory in plants. Genome Biol. 2017, 18, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Galati, S.; DalCorso, G.; Furini, A.; Fragni, R.; Maccari, C.; Mozzoni, P.; Giannelli, G.; Buschini, A.; Visioli, G. DNA methylation is enhanced during Cd hyperaccumulation in Noccaea caerulescens ecotype Ganges. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 26178–26190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Colak, I.; Karadayı, G. Comparison of DNA Methylation and Changes in the Expression of Certain Cadmium-induced Genes in Bread Wheat Exposed to Cadmium (Cd) Accumulation in Soil. Yüz. Yıl Üniv. Fen Bilim. Enst. Derg. 2024, 29, 830–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, X.S.; Li, H.; Feng, S.J.; Yang, Z.M. A transposable element-derived siRNAs involve DNA hypermethylation at the promoter of OsGSTZ4 for cadmium tolerance in rice. Gene 2024, 892, 147900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cong, W.; Miao, Y.; Xu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, C.; Wang, J.; Zhuang, T.; Lin, X.; Jiang, L.; Wang, N.; et al. Transgenerational memory of gene expression changes induced by heavy metal stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sharma, M.; Sidhu, A.K.; Samota, M.K.; Gupta, M.; Koli, P.; Choudhary, M. Post-translational modifications in histones and their role in abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Proteomes 2023, 11, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhao, P.; Malik, S. The phosphorylation to acetylation/methylation cascade in transcriptional regulation: How kinases regulate transcriptional activities of DNA/histone-modifying enzymes. Cell Biosci. 2022, 12, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xiang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Hu, Y.; Wang, L.; Xiao, X.; Yin, F.; Cao, X.; Sui, M.; Yao, Y. Epigenetic modifications of 45S rDNA associates with the disruption of nucleolar organisation during Cd stress response in pakchoi. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 270, 115859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Cao, X.; Zhang, M.; Xiao, X.; Yin, F.; Yao, Y.; Sui, M.; Hu, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Wang, L. Regulation of reactive oxygen molecules in pakchoi by histone acetylation modifications under Cd stress. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0314043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gocek-Szczurtek, N.; Żabka, A.; Wróblewski, M.; Polit, J.T. Stabilization of the MAPK–Epigenetic Signaling Axis Underlies the Protective Effect of Thyme Oil Against Cadmium Stress in Root Meristem Cells of Vicia faba. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 27, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dong, Y.; Ma, Y.; Li, Q.; Cao, Y.; Dong, D.; Chen, C.; Zhang, X.; Fan, Y.; Jin, X. Overexpression of histone demethylase gene SlJMJ18 and SlJMJ23 from tomato confers cadmium tolerance by regulating metal transport and hormone content in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2024, 346, 112169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, Q.; Sun, W.; Chen, C.; Dong, D.; Cao, Y.; Dong, Y.; Yu, L.; Yue, Z.; Jin, X. Overexpression of histone demethylase gene SlJMJ524 from tomato confers Cd tolerance by regulating metal transport-related protein genes and flavonoid content in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2022, 318, 111205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tannenbaum, M.; Sarusi-Portuguez, A.; Krispil, R.; Schwartz, M.; Loza, O.; Benichou, J.I.; Mosquna, A.; Hakim, O. Regulatory chromatin landscape in Arabidopsis thaliana roots uncovered by coupling INTACT and ATAC-seq. Plant Methods 2018, 14, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chekanova, J.A. Long non-coding RNAs and their functions in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015, 27, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Heo, J.B.; Lee, Y.S.; Sung, S. Epigenetic regulation by long noncoding RNAs in plants. Chromosome Res. 2013, 21, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lucero, L.; Fonouni-Farde, C.; Crespi, M.; Ariel, F. Long noncoding RNAs shape transcription in plants. Transcription 2020, 11, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mendoza-Soto, A.B.; Sánchez, F.; Hernández, G. MicroRNAs as regulators in plant metal toxicity response. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Qiu, Z.; Hai, B.; Guo, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L. Characterization of wheat miRNAs and their target genes responsive to cadmium stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 101, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gao, J.; Luo, M.; Peng, H.; Chen, F.; Li, W. Characterization of cadmium-responsive MicroRNAs and their target genes in maize (Zea mays) roots. BMC Mol. Biol. 2019, 20, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ding, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, C. Microarray-based analysis of cadmium-responsive microRNAs in rice (Oryza sativa). J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 3563–3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ding, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, F.; Jiang, Q.; Sun, J.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, C. MicroRNA268 overexpression affects rice seedling growth under cadmium stress. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 5860–5867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ma, X.; Yu, D.; Shao, W.; Xu, M.; Zuo, Z.; Wang, H.; Meng, Y. Transcriptome-wide identification and characterization of the copper and cadmium stress-responsive small RNAs and their targets in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Soil 2018, 429, 391–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Yuan, L.; Liu, Y.; Shen, T.; Zhang, Y. Comparative small RNA profiling and functional exploration on wheat with high- and low-cadmium accumulation. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 635599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Feng, S.J.; Zhang, X.D.; Liu, X.S.; Tan, S.K.; Chu, S.S.; Meng, J.G.; Zhao, K.X.; Zheng, J.F.; Yang, Z.M. Characterization of long non-coding RNAs involved in cadmium toxic response in Brassica napus. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 82157–82173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lin, K.; Yi, Z.; Lv, S.; Zhang, B.; Guo, Z.; Li, Y. Uncovering the key lncRNAs in regulating cadmium accumulation and translocation in sweet sorghum. Planta 2025, 261, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhu, M.; Liu, Y.; Bai, H.; Zhang, W.; Liu, H.; Qiu, Z. Integrated physio-biochemical and RNA sequencing analysis revealed mechanisms of long non-coding RNA-mediated response to cadmium toxicity in wheat. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 203, 108028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Karalija, E.; Ibragić, S.; Dahija, S.; Šamec, D. Transgenerational Memory of Phenotypic Traits in Plants: Epigenetic Regulation of Growth, Hormonal Balance, and Stress Adaptation. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chen, Z.J. Empowering plant epigenetics to breed resilience of crops: From nucleolar dominance to transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. Plant Genome 2025, 18, e70064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Li, G.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, F.; Shi, M.; Guan, Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, F.; Qiao, Q.; Geng, Y. Transcriptional memory of gene expression across generations participates in transgenerational plasticity of field pennycress in response to cadmium stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 953794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Maslennikova, D.; Koryakov, I.; Yuldashev, R.; Avtushenko, I.; Yakupova, A.; Lastochkina, O. Endophytic plant growth-promoting bacterium Bacillus subtilis reduces the toxic effect of cadmium on wheat plants. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zakrzewska, M.; Rzepa, G.; Musialowski, M.; Goszcz, A.; Stasiuk, R.; Debiec-Andrzejewska, K. Reduction of bioavailability and phytotoxicity effect of cadmium in soil by microbial-induced carbonate precipitation using metabolites of ureolytic bacterium Ochrobactrum sp. POC9. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1109467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Khanna, K.; Jamwal, V.L.; Gandhi, S.G.; Ohri, P.; Bhardwaj, R. Metal resistant PGPR lowered Cd uptake and expression of metal transporter genes with improved growth and photosynthetic pigments in Lycopersicon esculentum under metal toxicity. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Reddy, C.S.; Cho, M.; Kaul, T.; Joeng, J.T.; Kim, K.M. Pseudomonas fluorescens imparts cadmium stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana via induction of AtPCR2 gene expression. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2023, 21, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shahid, S.; Hussain, A.; Ahmad, M.; Jamil, M. Efficacy of cadmium tolerant bacteria in combination with jasmonic acid to alleviate Cd toxicity in cauliflower. Soil Environ. 2023, 42, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wu, R.; Sun, X.; Zhu, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Fang, Z.; Liu, H.; Du, S. Abscisic acid-producing bacterium Azospirillum brasilense effectively reduces heavy metals (cadmium, nickel, lead, and zinc) accumulation in pak choi across various soil types. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 298, 118277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Liu, J.; Pei, S.; Zheng, Q.; Li, J.; Liu, X.; Ruan, Y.; Luo, B.; Ma, L.; Chen, R.; Hu, W.; et al. Heavy metal contamination impacts the structure and co-occurrence patterns of bacterial communities in agricultural soils. J. Basic Microbiol. 2024, 64, 2300435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Cui, S.; Xiao, H.; Miao, D.; Yang, W. Metal uptake and translocation by Chinese brake fern (Pteris vittata) and diversity of rhizosphere microbial communities under single and combined arsenic and cadmium stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 85198–85209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhu, L.; Guo, J.; Sun, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhou, C. Acetic acid-producing endophyte Lysinibacillus fusiformis orchestrates jasmonic acid signaling and contributes to repression of cadmium uptake in tomato plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 670216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Vincent, S.A.; Kim, J.M.; Perez-Salamo, I.; To, T.K.; Torii, C.; Ishida, J.; Tanaka, M.; Endo, T.A.; Bhat, P.; Devlin, P.F.; et al. Jasmonates and histone deacetylase 6 activate Arabidopsis genome-wide histone acetylation and methylation during the early acute stress response. BMC Biol. 2022, 20, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Xiao, B.; Huang, J.; Guo, J.; Lu, X.; Zhu, L.; Wang, J.; Zhou, C. Flooding-induced rhizosphere Clostridium assemblage prevents root-to-shoot cadmium translocation in rice. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 439, 129619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ahn, M.A.; Lee, J.; Hyun, T.K. Histone deacetylase inhibitor, sodium butyrate-induced metabolic modulation in Platycodon grandiflorus roots enhances anti-melanogenic properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fan, X.; Mao, Q.; Zou, D.; Guo, P.; Du, H.; Chen, T.; He, C.; Xiong, B.; Ma, M. Responses of Brassica napus to soil cadmium under elevated CO2 concentration based on rhizosphere microbiome, root transcriptome and metabolome. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 216, 109127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shen, Y.; Issakidis-Bourguet, E.; Zhou, D.X. Perspectives on the interactions between metabolism, redox, and epigenetics in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 5291–5300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Plšková, Z.; Van Breusegem, F.; Kerchev, P. Redox regulation of chromatin remodelling in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2024, 47, 2780–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Chen, C.; Wang, M.; Zhu, J.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, Q.; Jing, M.; Chen, Y.; Xu, X.; Jiang, J.; et al. Long-term effect of epigenetic modification in plant–microbe interactions: Modification of DNA methylation induced by plant growth-promoting bacteria mediates promotion process. Microbiome 2022, 10, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Lephatsi, M.M. Epigenetic and Targeted Metabolic Changes in Microbial Biostimulant-Treated Maize Plants under Drought Stress Conditions. Master’s Thesis, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  74. Yaghoubi Khanghahi, M.; AbdElgawad, H.; Curci, M.; Garrigues, R.; Korany, S.M.; Alsherif, E.A.; Verbruggen, E.; Spagnuolo, M.; Addesso, R.; Sofo, A.; et al. Transcriptomic, biochemical, and microbiome assessments into drought and salinity tolerance in durum wheat mediated by plant growth-promoting bacteria. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2025, 31, 2121–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zheng, Z.; Li, P.; Xiong, Z.; Ma, T.; Mathivanan, K.; Praburaman, L.; Meng, D.; Yi, Z.; Ao, H.; Wang, Q.; et al. Integrated network analysis reveals that exogenous cadmium-tolerant endophytic bacteria inhibit cadmium uptake in rice. Chemosphere 2022, 301, 134655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Shao, L.; Li, X.; Xiao, T.; Lu, T.; Li, J.; Deng, J.; Xiao, E. Variations in microbial assemblage between rhizosphere and root endosphere microbiomes contribute to host plant growth under cadmium stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2023, 89, e00960-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cheng, L.; Li, Z.; Zhou, L.; Xie, J.; Zhou, Q.; Ding, M.; Wang, P.; Zhang, H.; Nie, M.; Huang, G. Rhizosphere microbiota modulate cadmium mobility dynamics and phytotoxicity in rice under differential Cd stress. Plant Soil. 2025, 516, 1455–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, M.; Zhao, J.; Gu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tang, Z.; Xu, Y.; Mao, X.; Zhang, J.; Tian, W. Deciphering the mechanism of rhizosphere microecosystem in modulating rice cadmium accumulation via integrating metabolomics and metagenomics. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 959, 178181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ramirez-Prado, J.S.; Piquerez, S.J.; Bendahmane, A.; Hirt, H.; Raynaud, C.; Benhamed, M. Modify the histone to win the battle: Chromatin dynamics in plant–pathogen interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kaya, C.; Uğurlar, F.; Adamakis, I.-D.S. Epigenetic and Hormonal modulation in plant–plant growth-promoting microorganism symbiosis for drought-resilient agriculture. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Liu, R.; Peng, X.P.; Newman, D.J.; Purchase, D.; Li, G.; Kusari, S. Unlocking the metabolic potential of endophytic fungi through epigenetics: A paradigm shift for natural product discovery and plant–microbe interactions. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2025, 42, 1690–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Xu, X.; Dou, Y.; Zhao, S.; Zhao, C.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, M.; Shen, Z.; Chen, C. Rhizosphere microbes enhance plant resistance to cadmium through a root ROS–microbial IAA–root DNA methylation interkingdom signaling pathway. Cell Rep. 2025, 44, 116491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Han, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Kong, Y.; Dong, H.; Feng, X.; Li, T.; Zhou, C.; Yu, J.; Xin, D.; et al. Changes in the m6A RNA methylome accompany the promotion of soybean root growth by rhizobia under cadmium stress. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 441, 129843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conceptual framework illustrating putative microbe-driven epigenetic regulation of plant responses under cadmium stress. Cadmium (Cd2+) exposure induces stress in plants by affecting metal uptake, sequestration, and root-to-shoot translocation. In parallel, rhizosphere and endophytic microbes interact with Cd-stressed roots and mitigate toxicity through the production of phytohormones (e.g., jasmonic acid, abscisic acid, auxin), organic acids (acetate, butyrate), and redox-active metabolites. These microbial signals modulate key plant physiological processes, including cell wall reinforcement (lignification and suberization), redox balance, primary metabolism, and stress-responsive gene expression, ultimately contributing to reduced Cd accumulation and improved stress tolerance. Microbial communities are depicted as structured interaction networks characterized by cooperative interactions and sustained biochemical signaling, providing a persistent rhizosphere environment rather than transient cues. Based on established links between hormonal, metabolic, and redox signaling and chromatin regulation, these persistent microbe-mediated cues are proposed to converge on epigenetic modulation, including changes in histone acetylation, DNA methylation, and chromatin accessibility. Solid arrows denote relationships supported by experimental evidence, including microbial modulation of Cd transport, antioxidant capacity, and hormone-mediated signaling pathways. Dashed arrows indicate proposed but not yet experimentally validated links between microbial interaction networks and chromatin-level regulation under Cd stress.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework illustrating putative microbe-driven epigenetic regulation of plant responses under cadmium stress. Cadmium (Cd2+) exposure induces stress in plants by affecting metal uptake, sequestration, and root-to-shoot translocation. In parallel, rhizosphere and endophytic microbes interact with Cd-stressed roots and mitigate toxicity through the production of phytohormones (e.g., jasmonic acid, abscisic acid, auxin), organic acids (acetate, butyrate), and redox-active metabolites. These microbial signals modulate key plant physiological processes, including cell wall reinforcement (lignification and suberization), redox balance, primary metabolism, and stress-responsive gene expression, ultimately contributing to reduced Cd accumulation and improved stress tolerance. Microbial communities are depicted as structured interaction networks characterized by cooperative interactions and sustained biochemical signaling, providing a persistent rhizosphere environment rather than transient cues. Based on established links between hormonal, metabolic, and redox signaling and chromatin regulation, these persistent microbe-mediated cues are proposed to converge on epigenetic modulation, including changes in histone acetylation, DNA methylation, and chromatin accessibility. Solid arrows denote relationships supported by experimental evidence, including microbial modulation of Cd transport, antioxidant capacity, and hormone-mediated signaling pathways. Dashed arrows indicate proposed but not yet experimentally validated links between microbial interaction networks and chromatin-level regulation under Cd stress.
Stresses 06 00008 g001
Figure 2. (A) Microbiome-mediated epigenetic remodeling under cadmium (Cd) stress involves a root ROS–microbial IAA–DNA methylation axis. Cd2+ exposure induces reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation in plant roots, which stimulates indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) biosynthesis in associated plant growth–promoting bacteria. Microbe-derived IAA modulates root ROS homeostasis and promotes the expression of key DNA methylation regulators, including MET1, DRM2, CMTs, and DDM1. This results in enhanced DNA methylation across CG, CHG, and CHH sequence contexts, contributing to the coordinated regulation of stress-responsive genes and functional attenuation of Cd toxicity. Genetic and epigenomic evidence supports mechanistic evidence linking microbial metabolism, ROS signaling, and plant epigenetic remodeling under Cd stress. (B) In parallel, rhizobial symbiosis reshapes cadmium-induced N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation patterns in soybean, leading to transcriptome-wide reprogramming of genes involved in hormone signaling, ROS homeostasis, MAPK cascades, and stress responses. Together, DNA-level and RNA-level epigenetic regulation highlight a coordinated multilayered mechanism underlying microbe-mediated adaptation to Cd stress.
Figure 2. (A) Microbiome-mediated epigenetic remodeling under cadmium (Cd) stress involves a root ROS–microbial IAA–DNA methylation axis. Cd2+ exposure induces reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation in plant roots, which stimulates indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) biosynthesis in associated plant growth–promoting bacteria. Microbe-derived IAA modulates root ROS homeostasis and promotes the expression of key DNA methylation regulators, including MET1, DRM2, CMTs, and DDM1. This results in enhanced DNA methylation across CG, CHG, and CHH sequence contexts, contributing to the coordinated regulation of stress-responsive genes and functional attenuation of Cd toxicity. Genetic and epigenomic evidence supports mechanistic evidence linking microbial metabolism, ROS signaling, and plant epigenetic remodeling under Cd stress. (B) In parallel, rhizobial symbiosis reshapes cadmium-induced N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation patterns in soybean, leading to transcriptome-wide reprogramming of genes involved in hormone signaling, ROS homeostasis, MAPK cascades, and stress responses. Together, DNA-level and RNA-level epigenetic regulation highlight a coordinated multilayered mechanism underlying microbe-mediated adaptation to Cd stress.
Stresses 06 00008 g002
Table 1. Epigenetic regulatory mechanisms underlying plant responses to Cd stress.
Table 1. Epigenetic regulatory mechanisms underlying plant responses to Cd stress.
Biological SystemEpigenetic Regulatory Mechanism Experimental/Analytical ApproachMechanistic InsightsPhysiological/Agronomic OutcomesProposed Research Limitations *Reference
Oryza sativaDNA methylation (CG, CHG, CHH contexts)Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS); RNA sequencing (RNA-seq); mutant analysis (met1, drm2); 5-azacytidine treatment2320 differentially methylated regions (DMRs); 2092 methylation-associated genes altered; hypermethylation predominance; reduced expression of OsIRO2, OsPR1b, Os09g02214 in drm2DNA demethylation promoted seedling growth but increased Cd accumulationTemporal dynamics and multigenerational stability not examined[10]
Noccaea caerulescens (Ganges) vs. Arabidopsis thalianaDNA methylation-mediated genome integrity regulationAlkaline comet assay; methyl-sensitive comet assay; qRT-PCRIncreased CpG methylation and MET1 expression in hyperaccumulator; reduced oxidative damageGenome protection associated with Cd toleranceFunctional causality between methylation and tolerance not directly validated[29]
Triticum aestivumGene-specific DNA methylationQuantitative analysis of DNA methylation using amplification polymorphism (qAMP); qRT-PCRDose-dependent methylation changes in UGT-3, LTP-4, PIP-1 correlated with transcriptionTissue-specific Cd tolerance responsesGenome-wide methylation landscape not assessed[30]
Oryza sativaRNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM)Transgenic overexpression; CHH methylation analysis; small-RNA detection; promoter deletion assaysCd induced early OsGSTZ4 activation followed by CHH hypermethylation via 24-nt small RNAs and OsDRM2Enhanced Cd detoxification and root Cd retentionLong-term epigenetic persistence under field conditions unknown[31]
Oryza sativa (S0–S3 generations)Transgenerational CHG hypomethylationGel-blot methylation assay; reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR); multigenerational phenotypingStress-induced CHG hypomethylation inherited via maternal and paternal lines; altered DNA methyltransferase and DDM1 expressionProgeny exhibited enhanced Cd toleranceUnderlying chromatin context and reversibility not clarified[32]
Brassica rapa (Pakchoi)Histone acetylation and methylation at 45S rDNAChromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP); DNA methylation assay; cytological analysisIncreased H3K9ac (histone H3 lysine 9 acetylation), H4K5ac, H3K9me2; promoter hypomethylationNucleolar reorganization and transcriptional modulationGenome-wide histone profiling lacking[35]
Brassica rapa (Pakchoi)Histone acetylation modulation via inhibitorsEpigenetic inhibitor treatments (5-AC, TSA, etc.); ROS assays; chromatin analysisIncreased histone acetylation attenuated Cd-induced ROS accumulation and DNA damageImproved Cd tolerance through ROS–epigenetic interactionSpecific gene targets of acetylation not identified[36]
Vicia fabaMAPK-associated DNA methylation and histone modificationMAPK activation assay; global 5-mC quantification; histone mark analysisCd doubled global 5-mC; altered H3K4Me2, H3K9Ac, H3K56Ac; thyme oil stabilized chromatinPrevention of chromatin compaction and transcriptional repressionStress duration limited to acute exposure[37]
Solanum lycopersicumHistone demethylases (SlJMJ18, SlJMJ23)Gene expression analysis; transgenic overexpression; GUS staining; hormone quantificationDifferential modulation of BR and ABA pathways; stage-specific Cd responseEarly sensitivity but later enhanced toleranceDirect chromatin targets not fully mapped[38]
Solanum lycopersicumHistone demethylase (SlJMJ524)Transgenic overexpression; flavonoid quantification; gene expression analysisUpregulation of glutathione–phytochelatin pathway and flavonoid biosynthesisAdult-stage Cd tolerance enhancementStage-dependent regulation mechanism unclear[39]
Arabidopsis thalianaChromatin accessibilityINTACT–ATAC sequencing (ATAC-seq)41,419 accessible sites; enrichment of H3K4me3 in promoters; distal regulatory elements identifiedOrgan-specific transcriptional regulationCd-specific chromatin remodeling not directly validated[40]
Triticum aestivummiRNA-mediated regulation (miR398)qRT-PCR; target validationmiR398 regulates CSD affecting oxidative stress toleranceModulation of Cd-induced antioxidant responsesLimited number of miRNAs examined[45]
Zea maysCd-responsive miRNAsqRT-PCR; enzyme activity assays; in situ hybridizationDifferential expression of candidate miRNAs; spatial validation of Zma-miR171bInsight into Cd stress signaling in rootsGenome-wide miRNA profiling not performed[46]
Oryza sativaCd-responsive miRNA profilingMicroarray; target prediction; expression validation19 Cd-responsive miRNAs targeting TFs and stress proteinsPost-transcriptional regulation of Cd toleranceFunctional validation limited to subset[47]
Oryza sativamiRNA (miR268) regulation of metal transportOverexpression; H2O2 and malondialdehyde quantificationmiR268 suppresses NRAMP3; increased Cd accumulationNegative regulation of Cd toleranceField relevance not evaluated[48]
Arabidopsis thalianaSmall-RNA (sRNA) networksSmall-RNA sequencing; degradome sequencingDCL-dependent sRNAs responsive to Cd; TAS-derived sRNAs identifiedHormone–stress signaling integrationFunctional assays for most sRNAs lacking[49]
Triticum aestivumCd-responsive small RNAsSmall-RNA sequencing; cultivar comparisonDifferential sRNAs linked to Cd accumulation differencesPotential biomarkers for low-Cd cultivarsValidation under agronomic conditions needed[50]
Brassica napusLong non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and eTMsStrand-specific RNA sequencing; transient expression assays301 Cd-responsive lncRNAs; miRNA precursor and target mimic rolesRegulation of Cd uptake and detox pathwaysDirect molecular targets incompletely validated[51]
Sorghum bicolorlncRNA–miRNA–target networklncRNA sequencing; dual-luciferase assay; cis/trans target analysislncRNA-mediated upregulation of SbYS1 (Cd chelate transporter)Positive regulation of Cd accumulation and translocationField-scale functional validation lacking[52]
Triticum aestivumCd-responsive lncRNAsStrand-specific RNA sequencing; overexpression in Arabidopsis thaliana69 cis-target pairs affecting photosystem II and antioxidant defenseEnhanced Cd tolerance via photosynthetic stabilizationEpigenetic chromatin context not resolved[53]
Thlaspi arvenseTranscriptional memory (transgenerational plasticity)RNA sequencing; weighted gene co-expression network analysis401 transcriptional memory genes; sustained CSD2 expressionPersistent elevated SOD activity across generationsDNA methylation or histone marks not directly mapped[56]
* The proposed research limitations reflect this review’s critical synthesis and do not necessarily represent limitations explicitly stated in the cited studies.
Table 2. Microbe-mediated strategies modulating Cd dynamics and plant performance.
Table 2. Microbe-mediated strategies modulating Cd dynamics and plant performance.
Biological SystemMicrobial StrategyExperimental/Analytical ApproachMechanistic InsightsPhysiological/Agronomic OutcomesProposed Research Limitations *Reference
Triticum aestivum + Bacillus subtilis 10-4Endophytic PGPR–mediated lignification and oxidative damage reductionSeed pre-treatment; pigment, lignin, H2O2, lipid peroxidation and Cd quantificationEnhanced root lignification strengthens apoplastic barrier, restricting Cd translocationImproved germination, biomass, pigment stability; reduced Cd accumulationField validation and molecular-level regulation of lignification under Cd stress remain unexplored[57]
Soil–Petroselinum crispum + Ochrobactrum sp. POC9 (MCC)Microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP)Soil physicochemical analysis; Cd bioavailability assays; plant growth analysisCd stabilization via carbonate precipitation reduces bioavailable Cd fractionReduced Cd uptake (shoot/root); improved plant condition and soil microbial activityLong-term stability of carbonate-bound Cd under variable field conditions requires assessment[58]
Solanum lycopersicum + Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia gladioliPGPR-mediated transporter modulation and thiol-based detoxificationGrowth analysis; thiol quantification; gene expression profiling of metal transportersPGPR inoculation attenuated Cd-induced upregulation of metal transporter genes and enhanced thiol-mediated detoxificationImproved growth, pigment content, metal tolerance indexSpecific transporter targets and long-term transcriptional regulation under field conditions remain unclear[59]
Arabidopsis thaliana + Pseudomonas fluorescensRegulation of AtPCR2 expressionIn silico promoter analysis; qRT-PCR; transgenic overexpression linesBacteria treatment associated with increased AtPCR2 transcript levels and enhanced Cd toleranceIncreased biomass, chlorophyll content, silique numberUpstream signaling linking bacterial cues to AtPCR2 regulation remains unclear[60]
Brassica oleracea (cauliflower) + Klebsiella spp. consortium (SS7+SS8)+ jasmonic acidBacterial EPS, siderophore, and IAA production combined with foliar JA applicationJar trials; antioxidant enzyme assays; Cd quantificationSynergistic microbial–hormonal activation of antioxidant and detox pathwaysIncreased biomass; reduced shoot/root Cd concentrationContribution of individual strains within consortium and long-term soil effects need clarification[61]
Brassica chinensis (pak choi)+ Azospirillum brasilenseIncreased ABA levels associated with reduced IRT1 and IRT2 expression; increased soil pHMulti-soil experiment; gene expression analysis; structural equation modelingABA elevation reduces Fe transporter-mediated Cd uptake; soil pH modulation decreases Cd availabilityStrong biomass increase; reduced multi-metal accumulationDurability of ABA-mediated regulation across cropping cycles remains unknown[62]
Solanum lycopersicum + Lysinibacillus fusiformis Cr33Acetic acid-mediated JA signaling; suppression of NO and Fe uptake systemsHormone quantification; gene expression; chemical inhibition assaysJA-dependent suppression of Fe transport limits Cd uptakeReduced root Cd accumulation; enhanced toleranceBroader applicability across species and environmental contexts requires validation[65]
Oryza sativa under flooding + Clostridium sp.Butyric acid-induced phenylpropanoid pathway; apoplastic barrier formationWGCNA; transcriptome–metabolome integration; Cd translocation assaysMicrobial butyrate enhances suberization and lignified xylem formationReduced root-to-shoot Cd translocationStability of Clostridium-driven barrier formation under fluctuating water regimes needs study[67]
Brassica napus under ECO2 conditionsCO2-driven modulation of antioxidant system and rhizosphere microbial compositionTranscriptomics; metabolomics; antioxidant assays; Cd quantificationECO2 increases Cd uptake but enhances detoxification via glutathione and ATPase pathwaysIncreased biomass and antioxidant capacityMechanistic separation of ECO2 and microbiome contributions remains limited[69]
Oryza sativa + Stenotrophomonas R5Enhanced microbial network complexity and cooperationMolecular ecological network analysisIncreased microbial connectivity correlates with reduced Cd absorptionReduced plant Cd content under Cd stressCausal relationship between network topology and Cd reduction remains to be experimentally confirmed[75]
Sedum alfredii ecotypesPhenolic compound-mediated shaping of keystone operational taxonomic units (OTUs)Comparative microbiome analysis; network analysisEcotype-specific microbial network complexity associated with improved growth under Cd stressHigher biomass in Cd-accumulating ecotypeDirect functional validation of keystone OTUs is required[76]
Oryza sativa under Cd gradientConcentration-dependent rhizosphere community shiftsCd speciation analysis; microbial diversity profilingRhizosphere-mediated effects shift from stress alleviation at moderate Cd to stress intensification at high CdBiomass recovery at moderate Cd; inhibition at high CdMechanisms underlying threshold-dependent microbial functional shifts remain unresolved[77]
Field cultivars of Oryza sativaMetabolite–microbiome interactions; cultivar-dependent differences in nutrient cyclingField experiment; metabolomics; metagenomicsMore diverse and interconnected microbial networks associated with Cd immobilization and antioxidant defense in low-accumulating cultivarsReduced Cd accumulation in low-accumulating cultivarsFunctional causality between specific metabolites and microbial taxa requires validation[78]
* The proposed research limitations reflect this review’s critical synthesis and do not necessarily represent limitations explicitly stated in the cited studies.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaya, C. Proposed Epigenetic Regulatory Frameworks at the Plant–Microbiome Interface Under Cadmium Stress. Stresses 2026, 6, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses6010008

AMA Style

Kaya C. Proposed Epigenetic Regulatory Frameworks at the Plant–Microbiome Interface Under Cadmium Stress. Stresses. 2026; 6(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses6010008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaya, Cengiz. 2026. "Proposed Epigenetic Regulatory Frameworks at the Plant–Microbiome Interface Under Cadmium Stress" Stresses 6, no. 1: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses6010008

APA Style

Kaya, C. (2026). Proposed Epigenetic Regulatory Frameworks at the Plant–Microbiome Interface Under Cadmium Stress. Stresses, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses6010008

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop