Next Article in Journal
Beyond the Classical Janzen–Connell Hypothesis: The Role of the Area Under the Parent Tree Crown of Manilkara zapota
Previous Article in Journal
Rice Responses to the Stem Borer Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) by Infrared-Thermal Imaging: Implications for Field Management
Previous Article in Special Issue
Regulation, Biosynthesis, and Extraction of Bacillus-Derived Lipopeptides and Its Implications in Biological Control of Phytopathogens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Confers Salinity Tolerance to Medicago sativa L.

by
Malena Achiary
1,
Camila Victoria Chiroli
1,
Maria Cecilia Pacheco Insausti
1,
Laura Virginia Gallardo
2,
Ivana Tamara Ponce
3 and
Hilda Elizabeth Pedranzani
1,*
1
Laboratorio Fisiología Vegetal, Facultad de Química Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, San Luis D5700, Argentina
2
Laboratorio de Morfofisiología, Facultad de Química Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, San Luis D5700, Argentina
3
Bioestadística, Facultad de Química Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, San Luis D5700, Argentina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Stresses 2024, 4(4), 752-761; https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4040049
Submission received: 23 July 2024 / Revised: 16 October 2024 / Accepted: 24 October 2024 / Published: 11 November 2024

Abstract

Alfalfa, a crop cultivated worldwide for use as livestock feed, exhibits great adaptability to various environmental conditions. This study evaluates the biomass production, lipid peroxidation, photosynthetic pigments and osmo-compatible response in Medicago sativa var CW660 mycorrhizae (AM) and non-mycorrhizae (NM) plants with Rhizophagus intraradices and when subjected to salinity (100 mM and 200 mM of NaCl). They were evaluated using the following morphological parameters: foliage fresh weight (FFW), foliage dry weight (FDW), root fresh weight (RFW), root dry weight (RDW), foliage length (FL) and root length (RL), chlorophylls a and b, proline and malondialdehyde (MDA) in AM and NM plants treated with different concentration of NaCl. The LFW and the LDW were higher in M plants. The RFW and the RDW increased in control AM plants, and under different saline treatments there were no differences between AM and NM in either parameter. FL increased in the control and at 100 mM of NaCl in M plants. Chlorophyll a decreased 27–30% and b decreased 1–50% in AM and NM plants at 200 mM NaCl. The proline level increased four times and promoted a defense in AM plants at 200 mM of NaCl. Lipid peroxidation decreased in AM plants by 10% at maximum salinity. M. sativa CW660 is sensitive to salinity stress, and inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) regulates its physiology and performance under such conditions, with osmotic protection and membrane protection.

1. Introduction

Soil degradation due to salinity has a strong impact on agricultural areas, affecting the physical–chemical properties of the soil and decreasing its fertility and productivity, mainly in semi-arid and arid areas [1]. The excessive application of fertilizers and herbicides and poor drainage systems and inadequate irrigation practices increase the levels of salinization in the soil, which reduces the infiltration rate and decreases the availability of water for crops [2,3]. Salt stress induces morphological, physiological and biochemical responses in plants. The effects are a consequence of osmotic and ionic factors. Salinity affects photosynthesis and respiration and produces oxidative damage and osmotic stress. The ions absorbed by the plant caused imbalances in mineral nutrition and have toxic effects on metabolism, germination and growth [4]. This impacts the productivity of extensive arable areas; therefore, it is necessary to find solutions to mitigate the effects of salt stress in agriculture. Alfalfa is widely used as livestock feed due to its low production cost and high-quality forage, meeting the nutritional needs of animals with high requirements [5], and it is cultivated on more than 30 million hectares around the world. Alfalfa exhibits great adaptability to various environmental conditions, growing in different soils and climates throughout the year [6].
Plants form symbiotic associations with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). These improve mineral nutrition and water uptake thanks to hyphae, while plants provide nutrients and a microhabitat for mycorrhizae [7]. Numerous studies demonstrate that the association with AMF allows the adverse effects caused by salinity to be mitigated, improving nutrient uptake, increasing osmotic adjustment and minimizing oxidative damage through antioxidant responses in the host plant. These effects result in improved growth, establishment and survival of the host plant in stressful environments. Additionally, mycorrhizal fungi may be potential tools to combat soil salinization in ecological conservation and restoration efforts [8,9,10]. The mycorrhizae–plant (AM) relationship is beneficial for both, as they contribute to the absorption of nitrogen and phosphorus, in addition to some micronutrients that are found in trace amounts, such as some metals, whose limitations in plants causes poor plant growth [11].
Studies have shown that inoculation with AMF, Rhizophagus intraradices in M. sativa L. var. Dekalb (DK166), influenced physiological parameters and antioxidant defense in plants under salt, drought and cold stress. Stomatal conductance, photosynthetic efficiency and aerial and root dry weight in mycorrhizal plants increased under drought and salinity, showing greater tolerance. Antioxidant defense increased in mycorrhizal plants and abiotic stress was mitigated [12]. Hormones are involved in mycorrhizal control, and jasmonic acid (JA) showed a significant increase in the AM plant of M. sativa L. (DK 166) under drought and salinity stresses [13]. The proteomic study reported that the accumulation pattern of PIP1 aquaporin protein was greater in NM plants than in AM alfalfa plants, thus ensuring the provision of water in symbiotic plants and a better water balance under stress [13]. Micronutrients such as Fe, Mn and macronutrients such as Ca and Mg increased in AM plants; in contrast, the concentration of heavy metals such as Cu, Pb, Ti, Hg, Bi, Cr, As and Be was lower under salt and drought stress [13]. In previous studies on the genotypes CW 197, Trinidad 87, CW 660 and Salina PV and levels of saline (NaCl) and cadmium (CdCl2) stress, factorial ANOVA was performed to identify the influence of stress conditions on the measured variables, and multiple comparisons analysis of means were performed when a significant effect was found. Under salinity, the CW660 genotype was tolerant to salinity at germination, but sensitive during growth [14].
We hypothesize that the alfalfa variety CW 660, sensitive to salt during growth in symbiosis with AM, can improve its hydraulic condition and tolerance to salinity. The objective was to study the effect of the symbiosis of Medicago sativa L. (CW660)-Rhizophagus intraradices against salt stress. The tolerance of M. sativa in symbiosis under salt stress was evaluated through the analysis of morphological parameters, photosynthetic pigments, the osmo-compatible response and oxidative damage.

2. Results

2.1. Percentage of Colonization

The application of salinity stress did not affect root colonization. The mycorrhization percentages of R. intraradices to M. sativa L. were 56.8% in non-stress plants, 46.3% in the 100 mM NaCl treatment and 69.8% in the 200 mM NaCl treatment; there were no significant differences between them (Table 1).

2.2. Germination

According to International Rules for Seed Testing (ISTA) [15], GE is an indicator of vigor and measures how quickly seeds germinate, providing information about the lot’s performance under various environmental conditions and its storage potential. The GP is expressed as the percentage of seeds that germinate and develop normal seedlings under optimal conditions of temperature, light and moisture. In the study of the germination of AM and NM seeds of M. sativa L. subjected to saline stress, those under 200 mM NaCl decreased significantly with respect to the control and seeds under 100 mM NaCl, both in the parameters of GE and those of GP. If the germination percentage of AM seeds is compared with that of NM seeds, there are no differences at low salt concentrations and in the control, but at 200 mM NaCl the AM seeds had a higher germination percentage than the NM seeds, both in the GE and GP parameters (Figure 1).

2.3. Morphological Parameters

Comparing the morphological values between AM and NM plants, it was observed that foliage fresh weight (FFW) and foliage dry weight (FDW) increased in all treatments in AM plants. Root fresh weight (RFW) and root dry weight (RDW) increased in the control AM plants. Foliage length (FL) was increased in the control and the saline treatment with 100 mM NaCl, and root length (RL) in the no treatment group (Table 2).

2.4. Pigments

Chlorophyll a decreased 27–30% (Figure 2A) and chlorophyll b decreased around 1–50% (Figure 2B) significantly at 200 mM NaCl, in both AM and NM plants. Chlorophyll photosynthetic pigments help to maintain photosynthesis even under salt stress. In this study, mycorrhizae did not show an increase in chlorophylls (a and b); they were affected in the same way in AM plants as in NM plants, decreasing their content.

2.5. Proline and Malondialdehyde (MDA)

Proline is an important osmotic protective substance that plays an indispensable role in maintaining the normal function of cells and in protecting the structure of cell membranes and the stability of biological macromolecule structures [16]. In NM plants, it did not act as a protector, with similar values without significant differences in all treatments. In AM at 200 mM NaCl, it was significantly increased (Figure 3A).
MDA is a natural antioxidant that plays an important role in protecting plants against oxidative stress [17]. MDA has been shown to regulate plant growth and development by modulating hormone activity [18]. MDA can protect plants against dehydration by regulating stomatal closure and reducing water loss [19].
The MDA content decreases significantly in shoots of AM plants when subjected to 200 mM NaCl compared to the NM group. This difference denotes the protection of mycorrhizae against the salt stress of 200 mM NaCl since MDA is an indicator of membrane lipid peroxidation (Figure 3B).

3. Discussion

Salinity causes three types of stress, osmotic, ionic and oxidative, which alter agricultural productivity [12]. It produces a decrease in water potential, reduces plant biomass and disturbs mineral nutrition, and high concentrations of Na+ and Cl cause ionic toxicity [20,21,22]. Germination is influenced by many genetic, endogenous and environmental factors [23,24]. The dry seeds’ imbibition (water absorption) triggers the metabolic mechanisms that initiate germination [25].
Salt stress decreases in water uptake during imbibition and may cause excessive uptake ions, delaying seed germination and seedling establishment [26,27,28]. AMF are able to make the plants tolerate the stress and alter their morphology and physiology in such a way that the plant can resist the stress [29]. Under stress, the growth and activity of fungi and plants could be affected. The homeostasis of phytohormones such as abscisic acid and gibberellic acid that participate in the regulation of germination [16] can suffer imbalances due to the toxic effect exerted by ions, altering the functionality of the membrane and the cell wall of the embryo [30]. In our studies, saline treatment significantly decreased germination in NM plants and the germination percentage significantly increased in AM plants. Various studies demonstrate that colonization by AMF has a protective effect on host plants, significantly increasing biomass and improving nutrient and water exchange [31,32]. However, salt stress can generate negative impacts on root colonization by AM fungi due to the accumulation of toxic substances in the rhizosphere, which can limit spore germination and hyphal development [33,34]. Our results showed that the degree of mycorrhization was not affected by the increase in salinity. The results obtained showed that when Medicago sativa L. var. CW 660 was mycorrhized, it increased the FW and DW of leaves both in control conditions and in the two levels of salt stress; however, the FWR only increased in the control, and the DW did so in the control and 100 mM NaCl groups. FL was greater in AM plants, but in the roots there were no differences between AM and NM plants. This is in agreement with the findings reported in citrus by [35] and in Viburum tinus [36] under salinity conditions, which demonstrate the protective effect that AMF have against saline stress [8]. Salt stress reduces the contents of photosynthetic pigments; this is attributed to the degradation of pigments affecting photosynthesis and growth [8,37]. At 200 mM NaCl, the contents of chlorophyll a and b were significantly reduced in both NM and AM. For tests carried out on M. sativa var. CW197 and CW660, a similar decrease was observed in NM plants [38].
Plants associated with AM accumulate more proline and sugars compared to NM plants [38,39]. These provide better resistance through osmoregulation, playing a role in stress tolerance in plants [40]. At 200 mM NaCl, a significant increase was observed in AM plants compared to NM plants subjected to the same salt concentration. This increase may be mediated by AMF to reduce the damage to cells under salt stress [37]. This behavior was reported in Vigna radiate [41], Glycine max [42] and Medicago sativa var. Dekalb [12].
Symbiosis protects plants by reducing pathways for ROS production, maintaining membrane integrity and stabilizing proteins and enzymes [43]. Malondialdehyde is a product of lipid peroxidation; its accumulation is related to the damage caused by reactive oxygen species under stressful conditions [17]. In our studies, MDA content remained unchanged in the control in both NM and AM. At 200 mM NaCl in AM plants, the MDA decreased significantly in relation to those NM plants; this means that the damage in AM plants is lower thanks to the fungus protection. These results coincide with those reported for Viola prionantha [44] and Medicago sativa L. var. Dekalb [12] associated with AMF against salt stress.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Germination

Medicago sativa var. CW660 seeds were divided into two groups: inoculated with Rhizophagus intraradices and non-inoculated. They were sown in Petri dishes, each containing 20 seeds arranged in 3 replicates per treatment. The dishes were lined with double-moistened filter paper and kept in darkness at 25 °C. They were irrigated with water as the control and saline solutions containing 100 mM and 200 mM of NaCl. Germination energy (GE) and germination power (GP) were measured on the 3rd and 7th day, respectively, using the following calculation: germination percentage (%) = number of germinated seeds/number of total seeds × 100.

4.2. Inoculation with Rhizophagus Intraradices

Inoculation was carried out using 1 cm3 of granular arbuscular mycorrhizae per pot in recipients of 500 mL with a sterilized mixture of soil/perlite substrate (1:1).

4.3. Treatments, Experimental Design and Growing Conditions

Three treatments were compared under a randomized complete block design with five replications. Treatments came from the combination of two factors: (1) inoculated with Rhizophagus intraradices and non-inoculated (control), and (2) growing conditions of non-stressed (control) or with one of two stresses (100 mM and 200 mM NaCl). The salinity levels used corresponded to 10 and 20 dS/m, which are common values in salinized soils.
The experimental units consisted of 50 pots of 500 mL each, and one seed per pot was sown in the sterilized mixture of soil/perlite (Figure 4). Plants were grown in a culture chamber at 25 °C with a photoperiod of 16 h light and 8 h darkness. When the plants reached a height of 10 cm, in the fourth week, stress treatments were started with different solution irrigation conditions, twice a week for one month.

4.4. Mycorrhizal Development

Rhizophagus intraradices colonization was estimated by a visual inspection of fungal structures after treatments with different stresses, with the clearing of roots in 10% KOH and staining with 0.05% (w/v) trypan blue in lactic acid [45]. The percentage of R. intraradices colonization was calculated according to the grid line intersections method [46]. Three boxes per treatment were analyzed, counting the mycorrhizal roots in the vertical and horizontal lines.

4.5. Plant Growth and Determination of Photosynthetic Pigments

At the end of the treatments, the plants were harvested and the FL, RL, FFW and FDW, RFW and RDW were measured in quintuplicate. To calculate the DW, the samples were placed in an oven at a temperature of 30 °C for 7 days. The determination of chlorophylls a and b was carried out according to [47]. Briefly, 100 mg of fresh aerial material (leaves) was collected, crushed in a mortar with 10 mL of 80% (v/v) acetone and filtered. The extract was kept at 4 °C until the spectrophotometer reading. The absorbance of photosynthetic pigments was measured at a wavelength of 646.6 nm (chlorophyll a) or 663.6 nm (chlorophyll b).

4.6. Proline Content

The Bates method (1973) was used for proline determination [48]. We took 0.5 g of fresh aerial material (leaves) and crushed it with a mortar and pestle with 10 mL of 3% aqueous sulfosalicylic acid solution. The homogenate was filtered and mixed with 2 mL of acid ninhydrin and 2 mL of glacial acetic acid. The mixture was boiled in a water bath at 100 ºC for 1 h at constant temperature and the reaction was stopped by immersing the tube in cold water. Then, 0.5 mL of the samples was taken and the absorbances were measured at 520 nm in a spectrophotometer, and the proline concentration in each was determined. The calibration curve was produced with the standard L-PROLINE p.a. C5H9NO2, with which the ug/mL of proline in the sample was calculated.

4.7. Oxidative Damage to Lipids

To determine the oxidative damage to lipids, 500 mg of FW of leaves was ground in a mortar on ice with 6 mL of 100 mM of potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7) and the homogenate was filtered with a Miracloth layer and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 20 min. The chromogen was formed by mixing 200 μL of supernatants with 1 mL of a reaction mixture containing 15% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA), 0.375% (w/v) 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA), 0.1% (w/v) butylhydroxytoluene and 0.2 N HCl, and the mixture was incubated at 100 °C for 30 min [49]. After cooling at room temperature, tubes were centrifuged at 800× g for 5 min and the supernatant was measured at 532 nm in the spectrometer. The standard used was 1,1,3,3-Tetramethohoxypropane Malonaldehyde bis (dimethyl acetal) (C7H14O4). Lipid peroxidation was estimated as the content of 2-thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) and expressed as equivalents of malondialdehyde (MDA) according to Halliwell and Gutterige (1989) [49].

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with Graph Pad Prism Version 8.0.2 (263). The morphological parameters were analyzed with Student’s T parametric test and the percentage of colonization, germination, pigments, proline and MDA results were analyzed using multifactorial ANOVA. Significant differences among treatments were identified using Tukey’s B test (p < 0.05).

5. Conclusions

Medicago sativa var. CW660 is affected by salinity, and its association with arbuscular mycorrhizae improves growth under these conditions. This research allows us to understand the responses of plants to abiotic stress and how the use of microorganisms is a sustainable alternative for the development of alfalfa crops in saline soils. Under salt stress, AM plants showed better performance than the NM in almost all measured parameters. The AM plants had greater growth than the NM plants in the parameters of leaf and root length, in the fresh and dry weight in the aerial and the root part. At concentrations of 200 mM NaCl, all morphological parameters and biochemicals decreased in NM plants. Chlorophyll a and b contents decreased at 200 mM in both AM and NM plants. The proline content associated with osmo-compatible protection increased at 200 mMNaCl in AM plants. MDA content increased in NM plants at 100 mM and 200 mM of NaCl, showing lipid peroxidation of the membranes. AM plants maintained similar MDA levels in all treatments, evidencing the protection of symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizae.
If the symbiosis of forage plants with mycorrhizae favors tolerance to salt stress, it would be a good biotechnological tool and would promote better practices that are more sustainable for the environment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.E.P.; Formal analysis, I.T.P.; Investigation, M.A., M.C.P.I., C.V.C. and L.V.G.; Methodology, M.A., M.C.P.I., C.V.C. and L.V.G.; Project administration, H.E.P.; Software, I.T.P.; Validation, H.E.P.; Writing—original draft, M.A.; Writing—review and editing, M.C.P.I. and H.E.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Secretary of Science and Technology, Consolidated Project N. 02-25223, of the National University of San Luis, San Luis, Argentina.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Majeed, A.; Muhammad, Z. Salinity: A Major Agricultural Problem-Causes, Impacts on Crop Productivity and Management Strategies. In Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance; Hasanuzzaman, M., Hakeem, K., Nahar, K., Alharby, H., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. Allbed, A.; Kumar, L. Soil salinity mapping and monitoring in arid and Semi-Arid Regions using remote sensing technology: A review. Adv. Remote Sens. 2013, 2, 373–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Adejumobi, M.A.; Alonge, T.A.; Ojo, O.I. A review of the techniques for monitoring soil salinity in irrigated fields. Adv. Multidiscip. Res. J. 2016, 2, 167–170. [Google Scholar]
  4. Willadino, L.; Camara, T. Origen y naturaleza de los ambientes salinos. In La Ecofisiología Vegetal: Una Cienciaen Síntesis; Reigosa, M.J., Pedrol, N., Sánchez-Moreiras, A., Eds.; Paraninfo S.A.: Madrid, Spain, 2003; pp. 303–330. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pagliaricci, H.R.; Saroff, A.C.; Ohanian, A.E. Densidad de plantas y producción de forraje de alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) con diferentesfrecuencias de corte y descansos de otoño. Asoc. Arg. Prod. Anim. Rev. Arg. Prod. Anim. 1991, 11, 285–293. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang, D.; Khurshid, M.; Min Sun, Z.; Xiong Tang, Y.; Liang Zhou, M.; Min Wu, Y. Genetic engineering of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Protein Pept. Lett. 2016, 23, 495–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Deja-Sikora, E.; Mercy, L.; Baum, C.; Hrynkiewicz, K. The Contribution of endomycorrhiza to the performance of potato virus Y-Infected Solanaceous Plants: Disease Alleviation or Exacerbation? Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Acosta-Motos, J.R.; Ortuño, M.F.; Bernal-Vicente, A.; Diaz-Vivancos, P.; Sanchez-Blanco, M.J.; Hernandez, J.A. Plant Responses to Salt Stress: Adaptive Mechanisms. Agronomy 2017, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Becerra, A. Los hongosmicorrícicosenambientesagrícolas, salinos, forestales y contaminados. In Proceedings of the IV ReuniónConjunta de Sociedades de Biología de La República Argentina, Mendoza, Argentina, 9–15 September 2020; p. 20. [Google Scholar]
  10. Liang, S.; Jiang, Y.; Li, M.; Zhu, W.; Xu, N.; Zhang, H. Improving plant growth and alleviating photosynthetic inhibition from salt stress using AMF in alfalfa seedlings. J. Plant Interact. 2019, 14, 482–491. [Google Scholar]
  11. Amir, A.H.; White, R.A.; Pubudu, P.; Christer Jansson, H. Rhizosphere engineering: Enhancing sustainable plant ecosystem productivity. Rhizosphere 2017, 3, 233–243. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pedranzani, H.E.; Gutiérrez, M.E.; Molina Arias, S.; Zapico, M.G.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Interaction with Medicago sativa Plants: Study of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Sustainable Agriculture. Adv. Investig. Agropecu. 2021, 25, 26–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pedranzani, H.E.; Barzana, G.; Gil, R.A.; Molina Arias, S.; Pacheco Insausti, M.C.; Ruiz Lozano, J.M. Jasmonates, aquaporins and nutritional response in Medicago sativa in symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizae under abiotic stresses. Ann. Agric. Sci. Res. 2022, 1, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pacheco Insausti, M.C.; Zapico, M.G.; Gonzalez, E.A.; Fernández, E.; Gutiérrez, M.E.; Stege, P.W.; Pedranzani, H.E. Salt and Cadmium Stress Tolerance in Four Genotypes of Medicago sativa L. Adv. Investig. Agropecu. 2022, 26, 62–78. [Google Scholar]
  15. ISTA. Chapter 5: The germination test. In International Rules for Seed Testing; International Seed Testing Association: Bassersdorf, Switzerland, 2014; Effective from 1 January 2014; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  16. Szabados, L.; Savoure, A. Proline a multifunctional amino acid. Trend Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kumar, V.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, P. Antioxidant potential of malondialdehyde in plants. J. Plat Physiol. 2017, 215, 133–141. [Google Scholar]
  18. Singh, S.; Singh, V.; Kumar, A. Malondialdehyde: A key player in plant growth regulation. Plant Signal. Behav. 2019, 14, 155–164. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, X. Malodialdehyde-mediated drought tolerance in plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 157, 110–118. [Google Scholar]
  20. Saxena, R.; Kumar, M.; Tomar, R.S. Plant responses and resilience towards drought and salinity stress. Plant Arch. 2019, 19, 50–58. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mitra, D.; Djebaili, R.; Pellegrini, M.; Mahakur, B.; Sarker, A.; Chaudhary, P.; Khoshru, B.; Del Gallo, M.; Kitouni, M.; Barik, D.P.; et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: Plant growth improvement and induction of resistance under stressful conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 2021, 44, 1993–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bencherif, K.; Dalpé, Y.; Lounès Hadj-Sahraoui, A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate soil salinity stress in arid and semiarid areas. In Microorganisms in Saline Environments: Strategies and Functions; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 375–400. [Google Scholar]
  23. Joosen, R.V.L.; Arends, D.; Li, Y.; Willems, L.A.; Keurentjes, J.J.; Ligterink, W.; Jansen, R.C.; Hilhorst, H.W. Identifying genotype-by-environment interactions in the metabolism of germinating Arabidopsis seeds using generalized genetical genomics. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 553–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rosental, L.; Nonogaki, H.; Fait, A. Activation and regulation of primary metabolism during seed germination. Seed Sci. Res. 2014, 24, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Weitbrecht, K.; Müller, K.; Leubner-Metzger, G. First off the mark: Early seed germination. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 289–3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Murillo-Amador, B.; Lopez-Aguilar, R.; Kaya, C.; Larrinaga-Mayoral, J.; Flores-Hernandez, A. Comparative effects of NaCl and polyethylene glycol on germination, emergence and seedling growth of cowpea. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2002, 188, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Almansouri, M.; Kinet, J.M.; Lutts, S. Effect of salt and osmotic stresses on germination in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Plant Soil 2001, 231, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kaya, M.D.; Okçu, G.; Atak, M.; Çıkılı, Y.; Kolsarıcı, Ö. Seed treatments to overcome salt and drought stress during germination in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Eur. J. Agron. 2006, 24, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Miransari, M. Stress and Mycorrhizal Plant. In Recent Advances on Mycorrhizal Fungi. Fungal Biology; Pagano, M., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Miransari, M. Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis to plant growth under different types of soil stresses. Plant Biol. 2010, 12, 563–569. [Google Scholar]
  31. Skubacz, A.; Daszkowska-Golec, A.; Szarejko, I. The Role and Regulation of ABI5 (ABA-Insensitive 5) in Plant Development, Abiotic Stress Responses and Phytohormone Crosstalk. Front. Plant 2016, 7, 1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Flowers, T.J.; Gaur, P.M.; Gowda, C.L.; Krishnamurthy, L.; Samineni, S.; Siddique, K.H.; Colmer, T.D. Salt sensitivity in chickpea. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 490–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Talaat, N.B.; Shawky, B.T. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on yield, nutrients, organic solutes, and antioxidant enzymes of two wheat cultivars under salt stress. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2011, 174, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Tang, M. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis Alleviates Salt Stress in Black Locust through Improved Photosynthesis, Water Status, and K+/Na+ Homeostasis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Murkute, A.A.; Sharma, S.; Singh, S.K. Studies on salt stress tolerance of citrus rootstock genotypes with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Hortic Sci. 2006, 33, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Trindade, A.V.; Siqueira, J.O.; Stürmer, S.L. Arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi in papaya plantations of Espirito Santo and Bahia, Brazil. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2006, 37, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Abbaspour, H.; Pour, F.S.N.; Abdel-Wahhab, M.A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis regulates the physiological responses, ion distribution and relevant gene expression to trigger salt stress tolerance in pistachio. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2021, 27, 1765–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Navarro, J.M.; Pérez-Tornero, O.; Morte, A. Alleviation of salt stress in citrus seedlings inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi depends on the rootstock salt tolerance. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gómez-Bellot, M.J.; Ortuño, M.F.; Nortes, P.A.; Vicente-Sánchez, J.; Martín, F.F.; Bañón, S.; Sánchez-Blanco, M.J. Protective effects of Glomus iranicum var. tenuihypharum on soil and Viburnum tinus plants irrigated with treated wastewater under field conditions. Mycorrhiza 2015, 25, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Borde, M.; Dudhane, M.; Kulkarni, M. Role of arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in salinity tolerance and growth response in plants under salt stress conditions. In Mycorrhiza-Eco-Physiology, Secondary Metabolites, Nanomaterials; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 71–86. [Google Scholar]
  41. Porcel, R.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal influence on leaf water potential, solute accumulation, and oxidative stress in soybean plants subjected to drought stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 1743–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sharifi, M.; Ghorbanli, M.; Ebrahimzadeh, H. Improved growth of salinity-stressed soybean after inoculation with salt pre-treated mycorrhizal fungi. J. Plant Physiol. 2007, 164, 1144–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Santander, C.; Ruiz, A.; García, S.; Aroca, R.; Cumming, J.; Cornejo, P. Efficiency of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inocula to improve saline stress tolerance in lettuce plants by changes of antioxidant defense mechanisms. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 1577–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liu, Y.J.; Fang, L.L.; Zhao, W.N.; Yang, C.X. Effects of different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on physiology of Viola prionantha under salt stress. Phyton-Int. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 92, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Giovannetti, M.; Mosse, B. An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol. 1980, 84, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Phillips, J.M.; Hayman, D.S. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1970, 55, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Porra, R.J. The chequered history of the development and use of simultaneous equations for the accurate determination of chlorophylls a and b. Photosynth. Res. 2002, 73, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.A.; Teare, I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J.M.C. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, 2nd ed.; Claredon Press: Oxford, UK, 1989; 543p. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (A) Germination energy and (B) germination power of M. sativa L. var. CW660 in control, 100 mM and 200 mM NaCl, both in mycorrhizal (AM) and non-mycorrhizal (NM) seeds. Different letters mean significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) as determined by the ANOVA test (n = 6).
Figure 1. (A) Germination energy and (B) germination power of M. sativa L. var. CW660 in control, 100 mM and 200 mM NaCl, both in mycorrhizal (AM) and non-mycorrhizal (NM) seeds. Different letters mean significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) as determined by the ANOVA test (n = 6).
Stresses 04 00049 g001
Figure 2. Chlorophyll a (A) and chlorophyll b (B) (µg/mL) in M. sativa L. var. CW660 plants under control, 100 mM and 200 mM NaCl treatments. Different letters mean significant differences (p ≤ 0.05), as determined by the ANOVA test (n = 3).
Figure 2. Chlorophyll a (A) and chlorophyll b (B) (µg/mL) in M. sativa L. var. CW660 plants under control, 100 mM and 200 mM NaCl treatments. Different letters mean significant differences (p ≤ 0.05), as determined by the ANOVA test (n = 3).
Stresses 04 00049 g002
Figure 3. Proline in ug/mL (A) and malondialdehyde (nmol MDA/g FW) (B) in shoots of NM and AM M. sativa L. var. CW660 plants under non-stress (control), 100 mM NaCl and 200 mM NaCl conditions. Different letters mean significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) as determined by the ANOVA test (n = 3).
Figure 3. Proline in ug/mL (A) and malondialdehyde (nmol MDA/g FW) (B) in shoots of NM and AM M. sativa L. var. CW660 plants under non-stress (control), 100 mM NaCl and 200 mM NaCl conditions. Different letters mean significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) as determined by the ANOVA test (n = 3).
Stresses 04 00049 g003
Figure 4. Experimental unit (pots) layout. NM: No mycorrhiza; AM: arbuscular mycorrhiza.
Figure 4. Experimental unit (pots) layout. NM: No mycorrhiza; AM: arbuscular mycorrhiza.
Stresses 04 00049 g004
Table 1. Mycorrhization percentage of Medicago sativa L. roots in control, 100 and 200 mM NaCl.
Table 1. Mycorrhization percentage of Medicago sativa L. roots in control, 100 and 200 mM NaCl.
TreatmentsPercentage of Mycorrhization
Control56.8% a
100 mM NaCl46.3% a
200 mM NaCl69.8% a
Table 2. Morphological parameters in Medicago sativa L. AM and NM plants in control, 100 and 200 mM NaCl groups. Different letters mean significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) as determined by the ANOVA test (n = 3).
Table 2. Morphological parameters in Medicago sativa L. AM and NM plants in control, 100 and 200 mM NaCl groups. Different letters mean significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) as determined by the ANOVA test (n = 3).
TreatmentsNM PlantsAM Plants
FFW (g)
Control0.43 + 0.10 c0.82 + 0.15 a
100 mM NaCl0.50 + 0.06 b0.63 + 0.05 a
200 mM NaCl0.49 + 0.06 b0.65 + 0.06 a
FDW (g)
Control0.08 + 0.06 b0.15 + 0.032 a
100 mM NaCl0.10 + 0.01 b0.14 + 0.02 a
200 mM NaCl0.10 + 0.06 b0.14 + 0.01 a
RFW (g)
Control0.34 + 0.04 b0.97 + 0.19 a
100 mM NaCl0.71 + 0.11 a0.73 + 0.07 a
200 mM NaCl0.61 + 0.05 a0.72 + 0.04 a
RDW (g)
Control0.03 + 0.03 c0.096 + 0.01 b
100 mM NaCl0.09 + 0.00 b0.083 + 0.08 b
200 mM NaCl0.13 + 0.03 a0.107 + 0.01 a
FL (cm)
Control15.16 + 0.40 b20.00 + 1.00 a
100 mM NaCl14.93 + 1.06 b19.33 + 2.08 a
200 mM Na Cl18.07 + 1.50 a17.67 + 0.57 a
RL (cm)
Control13.67 + 1.52 a15.33 + 0.57 a
100 mM NaCl13.00 + 1.00 a13.33 + 2.30 a
200 mM NaCl13.67 + 0.57 a15.67 + 0.57 a
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Achiary, M.; Chiroli, C.V.; Pacheco Insausti, M.C.; Gallardo, L.V.; Ponce, I.T.; Pedranzani, H.E. Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Confers Salinity Tolerance to Medicago sativa L. Stresses 2024, 4, 752-761. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4040049

AMA Style

Achiary M, Chiroli CV, Pacheco Insausti MC, Gallardo LV, Ponce IT, Pedranzani HE. Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Confers Salinity Tolerance to Medicago sativa L. Stresses. 2024; 4(4):752-761. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4040049

Chicago/Turabian Style

Achiary, Malena, Camila Victoria Chiroli, Maria Cecilia Pacheco Insausti, Laura Virginia Gallardo, Ivana Tamara Ponce, and Hilda Elizabeth Pedranzani. 2024. "Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Confers Salinity Tolerance to Medicago sativa L." Stresses 4, no. 4: 752-761. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4040049

APA Style

Achiary, M., Chiroli, C. V., Pacheco Insausti, M. C., Gallardo, L. V., Ponce, I. T., & Pedranzani, H. E. (2024). Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Confers Salinity Tolerance to Medicago sativa L. Stresses, 4(4), 752-761. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4040049

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop