Next Article in Journal
Luxury Travel Retail Experiences of Chinese Tourists: Extending the Luxury Customer Experience Framework and Proposing the TRACE Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Tourism and the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage: Anthropological Insights into the Antruejos of León, Spain
Previous Article in Journal
Who Holidays at Home? Segmenting Bulgarian Domestic Tourists Through Cluster Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experiential Attractiveness, Self-Concept Connection, and Attitude Toward the Museum as Drivers of Visitor Experience and Location Loyalty in University Museums
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gastronomic Identity of Mačva (Western Serbia): Perceptions, Determining Factors, and the Influence on Domestic Tourists’ Purchases of Traditional Food

by
Aleksandra Vasić Popović
1,
Bojana Kalenjuk Pivarski
2,
Dragana Ilić Udovičić
1,
Stefan Šmugović
2,*,
Velibor Ivanović
2,
Tamara Stošić
2 and
Dragana Novakovic
3
1
Department of Medical and Business-Technological Studies, Academy of Professional Studies Šabac, 15000 Šabac, Serbia
2
Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
3
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Tour. Hosp. 2026, 7(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp7010021
Submission received: 29 November 2025 / Revised: 29 December 2025 / Accepted: 4 January 2026 / Published: 13 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Authentic Tourist Experiences: The Value of Intangible Heritage)

Abstract

The gastronomic identity represents a blend of tradition, local resources, and cultural values that shape the authenticity and distinctiveness of a region’s gastronomy. Mačva, as an area in western Serbia, possesses an exceptionally rich gastronomic heritage whose tourism potential has not been sufficiently valorized. The subject of this research is the examination of the gastronomic identity of Mačva, and the purpose of the study is to determine how domestic tourists perceive the region’s gastronomic identity, which factors shape this identity, and the extent to which socio-demographic and perceptual characteristics influence the likelihood of purchasing traditional food products. The aim of this research is to develop an analytical framework to identify the key factors shaping the gastronomic identity of the Mačva region and to examine their influence on domestic tourists’ perceptions and consumer behavior related to the consumption and purchase of traditional food. The data were processed using exploratory factor analysis and binary logistic regression. The results indicate that respondents recognize the gastronomic culture of Mačva as an important component of the region’s cultural identity. The factor structure confirmed a three-dimensional model of gastronomic identity, comprising cultural–gastronomic heritage, authenticity and the promotion of gastronomy, and the region’s economic and social development. The results suggest that tourists’ intention to purchase traditional products is shaped by selected socio-demographic and perceptual factors, particularly gender and perceptions of gastronomy as a driver of economic and social development. The findings highlight the need for a differentiated approach to the development and positioning of the gastronomic offer, which may serve as a basis for formulating strategies for the development and branding of the Mačva region.

1. Introduction

Gastronomic identity (GI) is grounded in intangible elements such as geographic and climatic conditions that determine the availability of food resources, as well as in cultural factors including religion, history, ethnic diversity, tradition, customs, beliefs, and value systems. The combination of these elements produces distinctive flavors that define the recognize ability of a particular cuisine (Suna & Alvarez, 2019; Güleç & Yılmaz, 2023; Ondieki, 2025). GI can also be viewed through the intertwined combination of gastronomic culture and religion, as well as through the quality and composition of food, hospitality facilities, and gastronomic events. These elements exert the strongest influence on the formation and recognition of a destination’s identity (Suna & Alvarez, 2019; Kalenjuk Pivarski et al., 2024a; Kovalenko et al., 2023). Contemporary society recognizes culture and cultural heritage as one of the key foundations for the formation and preservation of a destination’s identity (Di Pietro et al., 2018). Gastronomy represents a bridge that connects the identity and historical circumstances of a given area and, as such, has developed into an important element that links tradition with the contemporary era (Lin et al., 2021; Rivza et al., 2022). The factors that shape GI are closely interwoven, and GI increasingly occupies a central place in research focused on gastronomy and cultural heritage (Arana & Zúñiga, 2022; Paunić et al., 2024). This growing interest contributes to the development of diverse theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of GI. Although Lin et al. (2021) highlight the importance of the topic, research on gastronomy as a form of cultural and identity-related intangible heritage of tourist destinations remains relatively scarce.
Due to its geographical, historical, and economic characteristics, there is a clear need for a more detailed examination of the Mačva District. This area of the Republic of Serbia, bordered by the Drina River to the west and the Sava River to the north, is located in a highly fertile part of the plain, which has enabled continuous settlement since the earliest periods. In addition to its rich cultural and historical heritage and numerous traditional events that represent potential for the development of cultural tourism, the region is also characterized by intensive agricultural production, which provides a foundation for the development of rural tourism. All of these elements highlight the importance of researching the tourism potential of Mačva, particularly in the context of enhancing the tourism offer and increasing visitation (Local strategy for rural development: Mačvanskaravnica 2020–2023, 2020).
The subject of this research is the examination of the GI of Mačva, as part of Western Serbia, with particular attention to domestic tourists’ perceptions of GI and the factors that influence its formation, as well as to the impact of the identified factors on consumer behavior in the purchase of traditional food.
The purpose of this research is to determine how domestic tourists perceive the GI of the Mačva region, to identify the factors shaping this identity, and to assess the extent to which socio-demographic and perceptual characteristics influence the likelihood of purchasing traditional food products.
The aim of this study is to develop an analytical framework that enables the identification and evaluation of the factors contributing to the formation of the GI of the Mačva region, as well as to analyze their influence on how domestic tourists perceive traditional food and exhibit consumer behavior related to its consumption and purchase. The research was conducted in the Mačva region and draws on the findings and methodological approaches of similar studies in this field (Paunić et al., 2024; Kalenjuk Pivarski et al., 2024a).
To address the stated research purpose and systematically examine the GI the Mačva region, the study is guided by the following research questions:
  • Q1: What do tourists perceive as the defining elements of GI?
  • Q2: Which factors shape the GI of the region?
  • Q3: Which socio-demographic and perceptual factors of GI influence tourists’ intention to purchase traditional food?

2. Literature Review

2.1. Elements of GI in Tourism

GI, through the combination of its constituent elements, reflects the cultural tradition of the local population and contributes to the preservation of a sense of belonging by transmitting knowledge, values, and gastronomic experiences from one generation to the next (Kalenjuk Pivarski et al., 2023, 2024a). GI, as part of the broader concept of gastronomy, represents an important segment of intangible cultural heritage because it carries significant cultural value and connects the elements that shape the historical, social, and identity features of a community. As such a phenomenon, GI functions as a developmental resource that links tradition with contemporary tourism flows (Lin et al., 2021). Culinary tradition, as a bearer of GI, is transmitted across generations through oral tradition, rituals, and gastronomic events, thereby contributing to the preservation of collective memory and the cultural distinctiveness of the community (Partarakis et al., 2021; Bortolotto & Ubertazzi, 2018; Lee, 2023; Chukwurah et al., 2025).
Local products play an essential role in preserving and presenting cultural identity and represent one of the key elements of a destination’s tourist appeal (Lin et al., 2021; Kapitány & Kapitány, 2024; Kovalenko et al., 2023). Traditional food products, as the result of long-standing local practices and preserved preparation techniques passed down from generation to generation, constitute a fundamental component of the GI of any community (Šmugović et al., 2025). Local and authentic products, which often bear designations of geographical origin, possess a value that extends beyond their nutritional function. They convey stories about the land, the people, and the tradition, becoming recognizable symbols of the region and an important motive for tourists seeking genuine experiences (Noguer-Juncà et al., 2021; Rivza et al., 2022).
Gastronomic events, grounded in the use of local products and sustainable resources, represent an important opportunity for tourists to experience authentic encounters while simultaneously fostering the economic development and socio-cultural vitality of the destination (Folgado-Fernández et al., 2019). According to Silva et al. (2025), the geographical and cultural characteristics of gastronomy emphasize authenticity and the integration of local traditions as key elements in shaping a rich tourist experience, while gastronomic events play a central role in promoting local products and fostering the development of sustainable tourism. As emphasized by Gündüz et al. (2024), Fontefrancesco and Zocchi (2020), Kalenjuk Pivarski et al. (2024a), and Yang et al. (2020), food-related events contribute to the preservation of cultural tradition, the enhancement of economic development, and the sustainability of tourist destinations, while simultaneously promoting local heritage as the foundation of gastronomic identity. Hospitality facilities play an important role in presenting and valuing gastronomic identity, as they represent the primary channel through which tourists acquire gastronomic experience (Paunić et al., 2024). Tourist experiences become unique and memorable when the gastronomic offer is infused with local identity and cultural tradition (Hurdawaty et al., 2025). According to Paunić et al. (2024) and Suna and Alvarez (2019), the elements that constitute gastronomic identity are numerous, which has led to the adoption of various approaches to its study.
Based on the literature review, the following hypothesis is formulated:
H1. 
Tourists perceive cultural tradition, local products, and gastronomic events as key elements through which the gastronomic identity of the region is constructed.

2.2. Factors of GI

Factors such as food culture, ethnic background, food-related events, education, sustainable development and economic aspects indicate that gastronomic identity possesses a complex and multidimensional character (Suna & Alvarez, 2021; Kalenjuk Pivarski et al., 2023). Within gastronomic and cultural heritage, traditional food products hold particular significance, as their value is rooted in the transmission of recipes across generations, characteristic preparation techniques, and distinctive sensory attributes, all of which shape different consumer attitudes (Vlontzos et al., 2018). Culinary and gastronomic heritage can be viewed as a strategic component of a region’s tourism product (Duda, 2024). An illustrative example is the culinary identity of Tuscany, known for products such as wine, olive oil, and cured meats, which are deeply rooted in local culture. In this context, the gastronomic and cultural heritage of Tuscany is not only a source of economic value but also an expression of local identity and pride (Duda, 2024).
According to Kladou and Trihas (2022), the promotion of gastronomic and cultural heritage represents a key element in the branding of tourist destinations, as it integrates local gastro-cultural values that authentically reflect a destination’s gastronomic identity and distinctiveness. Contemporary strategies based on the co-creation of tourist experiences simultaneously promote a healthy, sustainable, and culturally unique lifestyle through local specificities, organic production, and traditional or modern gastronomic forms. As emphasized by Dias and Posheliuznaia (2025), branding, as part of the promotional strategy and the destination image, represents the crucial link between local gastronomy and visitors’ experiences. Research by Dias and Posheliuznaia (2025) and Kalenjuk Pivarski et al. (2024b) indicates that tourists often value destinations through unique and authentic gastronomic experiences, which influence their emotional attachment to the place.
The factors that enable the recognition of gastronomic heritage increasingly depend on the level of institutional support and the acknowledgment of its significance not only as a cultural asset but also as an economic resource, while examples such as Malaysia and Turkey demonstrate that systematic investment in the preservation and promotion of gastronomic heritage can become a powerful driver of economic growth, regional competitiveness, and the strengthening of national identity (Lin et al., 2021). Lin et al. (2021) confirm that gastronomy represents an important source of income and employment, as illustrated by the experiences of countries such as Italy and Germany, where gastronomy is recognized as a strategic economic resource essential for the sustainable development of both the public and private sectors. Furthermore, the organization and promotion of gastronomic events including festivals, gastro-tours, and workshops generate distinctly multiplicative economic effects.
On the other hand, such initiatives stimulate the growth of tourist traffic and extend visitors’ length of stay, while on the other hand, they generate direct income for local producers, farmers, artisans, and hospitality venues, thus contributing to local economic prosperity and the development of rural communities (Kalenjuk Pivarski et al., 2024b). Based on the analysis of the relevant literature, it can be concluded that the GI of the region is grounded in three interconnected factors gastronomic-cultural factors, the promotion of authenticity, and economic factors which serves as the basis for formulating the second hypothesis.
H2. 
The GI of the region is based on three interconnected factors: cultural and gastronomic heritage, the authenticity and promotion of gastronomy, and economic and social dimensions of development.

2.3. The Influence of Socio-Demographic and Perceptual Factors of GI on Decisions to Purchase Traditional Food

Understanding tourists’ behaviors, their perceptions, motivations, intentions, and satisfaction represents a key step in examining how gastronomic and cultural heritage influences the tourist experience (Qiu et al., 2022). Tourists’ perceptions, along with the various factors that influence their behavior, play a decisive role in shaping their habits and decisions regarding the purchase of traditional products. Socio-demographic characteristics such as gender, age, educational level, religious affiliation, and country of origin strongly influence tourists’ attitudes, preferences, and willingness to consume and purchase traditional food (Sengel et al., 2015; Türker & Süzer, 2021; Okumus et al., 2021; Verner et al., 2023). Baby and Joseph (2023) indicate that educational background and social status directly influence the perception and evaluation of gastronomic experiences, with differences in income and education resulting in distinct patterns of experiential consumption within gastronomic tourism. Furthermore, numerous authors (Komariah et al., 2020; Kestwal et al., 2025; Sutiadiningsih et al., 2023) note that perceptual factors such as positive attitudes toward traditional food, social norms, and perceived behavioral control namely accessibility and affordability have a significant influence on the intention to purchase and consume traditional products. Tourist consumption oriented toward traditional food represents an important driver of the development of tourism services and the enhancement of the gastronomic offer (Verner et al., 2023). Purchase decisions and food choices result from a complex interaction of multiple factors (González et al., 2020; Baby & Joseph, 2023). Understanding the influence of perceptual and socio-demographic factors on consumer behavior enables producers and tourism organizations to tailor their promotional offers and marketing strategies to different consumer profiles (Baby & Joseph, 2023). Among the most significant perceptual determinants of purchasing local food are freshness, trust in quality and transparency of the offer, the absence of additives, high nutritional value, and the motivation to support sustainable gastronomy (Baby & Joseph, 2023). Furthermore, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control have a significant and positive influence on tourists’ intention to consume traditional food, in other words, positive attitudes and social support increase the likelihood of purchasing and consuming traditional products (Komariah et al., 2020). A positive perception of traditional food is particularly evident among younger and highly educated consumers, who demonstrate a greater awareness of the cultural value and authenticity of such products (Vlontzos et al., 2018).
While previous studies have identified gastronomic identity as a multidimensional construct, fewer studies explicitly explain how its dimensions translate into concrete consumer behavior. In this study, gastronomic identity is conceptualized as a value-generating mechanism that shapes tourists’ perceptions of authenticity, cultural meaning, and regional development. These perceptions operate as key pathways through which gastronomic identity becomes behaviorally relevant, increasing tourists’ willingness to support local gastronomy through the purchase of traditional food products.
Considering that attitudes represent stable cognitive and affective predispositions that strongly influence behavior in the process of purchasing and consumption (Singh et al., 2024), the following hypothesis is formulated and will be empirically tested by examining the influence of socio-demographic and perceptual factors on the intention to purchase traditional food:
H3. 
Socio-demographic and perceptual factors significantly influence the intention to purchase traditional food during a tourist visit.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. The Research Location

The Mačva district represents a region of the Republic of Serbia located in the western part of the country, with its administrative center in the city of Šabac. The research was conducted in the Mačva region, an area of economic, cultural, and gastronomic significance for Western Serbia (Mačva district—Official internet presentation, n.d., http://macvanski.okrug.gov.rs/, accessed on 4 November 2025). Eight municipalities were included in the study: Šabac, Bogatić, Loznica, Vladimirci, Koceljeva, Mali Zvornik, Krupanj, and Ljubovija. The analysis focused on the GI of the entire Mačva area, as well as on identifying local specificities that contribute to its distinctiveness. The research area is presented in Figure 1.

3.2. Questionnaire Design

The questionnaire was designed with the aim of collecting relevant data on the perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors of domestic tourists regarding the GI of Mačva. The conceptual framework for developing the questionnaire was based on findings from previous research in the fields of GI and consumer behavior (Verner et al., 2023; Baby & Joseph, 2023; Paunić et al., 2024; Kalenjuk Pivarski et al., 2024a, 2024b). The final version of the questionnaire consists of three sections:
  • Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Respondents
Data were collected on gender, age, place of residence, educational level, employment status, and monthly income. These indicators enabled a more detailed understanding of the structure of the surveyed population and contributed to profiling consumers within the tourism and hospitality sector.
2.
Perceptions of the region’s GI
The aim was to identify the general level of agreement with specific statements and to determine the dominant perceptions related to the recognizability, valuation, and potential for enhancement of the region’s gastronomic offer. A total of 18 statements were formulated, which respondents evaluated on a five-point Likert scale (from 1—“strongly disagree” to 5—“strongly agree”). This approach made it possible to measure a full spectrum of perceptions from complete disagreement to complete agreement thereby providing deeper insights into expectations related to the gastronomic potential of Mačva.
3.
Perceptions regarding the consumption and purchase of traditional food
In the third part of the survey, respondents indicated whether they were inclined to purchase and consume traditional products while traveling, by answering “yes” or “no” to the corresponding questions. In this way, data were collected on respondents’ perceptions of gastronomic products that constitute an integral part of the local identity and the region’s tourism offer.
The operationalization of variables was guided by established theoretical and empirical approaches to gastronomic identity in tourism and hospitality research. Previous studies conceptualize gastronomic identity as a multidimensional construct encompassing cultural heritage, authenticity, promotion of gastronomy, and its role in local economic and social development (e.g., Paunić et al., 2024; Kalenjuk Pivarski et al., 2024a; Baby & Joseph, 2023; Verner et al., 2023). Building on these frameworks, the present study conceptualized gastronomic identity through a set of observable indicators reflecting both symbolic and functional dimensions of gastronomy within a destination context.
An initial pool of items was generated based on a review of the relevant literature and adapted to the specific context of the Mačva region. The selection of variables was aligned with the first research question, which aims to identify the defining elements of gastronomic identity, and therefore focused on attributes related to cultural and gastronomic heritage, gastronomic authenticity and promotion, and economic and social development. All items were measured using a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 5 (“strongly agree”).

3.3. Questionnaire Validation Testing

The questionnaire items were formulated to be clear, unambiguous, and easily understood by a broad population of respondents. Prior to conducting the main research, the instrument was pilot-tested on a smaller sample (N = 30) to assess the clarity of the formulations and the reliability of the measurement scales used. Based on the pilot test results, minor adjustments were made to the wording of the statements in order to enhance the clarity, internal consistency, and precision of the instrument.
The selection of variables and the structure of the questionnaire were based on previously established determinants of gastronomic identity, ensuring an adequate level of validity and reliability of the instrument. The formulated statements were adapted to the specific characteristics of the study area and the features of the gastronomic identity of the Mačva region. In accordance with the research topic, particular attention was given to attributes relevant for the hospitality sector, which play a key role in recognizing and developing the gastronomic tourism offer.
The internal consistency of the Likert scale was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, with values ranging from 0.91 to 0.92, indicating a high level of internal reliability and confirming the appropriateness of applying the instrument in the main study.

3.4. Conducting Research

The research was conducted on a sample of 458 adult domestic visitors to the Mačva region, who represent key actors in the process of selecting and purchasing gastronomic products that form an integral part of the region’s overall gastronomic offer. The sample included different groups of domestic tourists, providing a diverse and balanced representation of respondents. This study focuses exclusively on domestic visitors in order to provide a realistic insight into their attitudes and consumer behavior related to traditional food consumption.
Data were collected between August 2024 and September 2025 using a structured questionnaire administered through a face-to-face intercept survey approach. Data collection was conducted on a rolling basis during organized gastronomic and cultural tourism events across the territory of the above-mentioned municipalities until September 2025. The questionnaires were distributed in person by the researchers during organized gastronomic and cultural tourism events in the territory of the above-mentioned municipalities. The survey was conducted on-site, under real conditions of the destination’s tourism offer. Respondents completed the questionnaire independently, with the possibility of obtaining additional clarification when necessary, and the average completion time ranged from 10 to 15 min. Prior to participation, respondents were informed about the aim and purpose of the study and were assured of the anonymity and confidentiality of the collected data, while participation was entirely voluntary. Consequently, the sample should be interpreted as analytical rather than statistically representative, and the findings should be generalized with appropriate caution.

3.5. Statistical Data Analysis

The statistical analysis was conducted using R software (version 4.3.2). The analytical procedure comprised several interrelated stages, aligned with the research objectives: descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and logistic regression. In the descriptive phase, measures of central tendency and dispersion were applied to evaluate respondents’ attitudes toward statements rated on a five-point Likert scale, while frequencies and percentage distributions were presented for categorical variables. This step provides insight into the basic characteristics of the sample and the distribution of responses, representing an essential prerequisite for conducting subsequent multivariate analyses (Field, 2018). To identify the latent dimensions of respondents’ attitudes toward the region’s gastronomic identity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was employed. This technique enables the reduction of a large number of variables into a smaller set of factors representing common underlying constructs (Hair et al., 2019). The Principal Axis Factoring (PAF) method was applied, as it is suitable for uncovering latent constructs, while Oblimin rotation allowed for correlations among the factors, consistent with the assumption of interrelated cultural, economic, and social dimensions (Costello & Osborne, 2005). Prior to conducting the EFA, the full dataset was randomly split into two independent subsamples: 60% of respondents (n = 274) were used exclusively for EFA, while the remaining 40% (n = 184) were reserved for CFA. This split-sample design prevents inflation of construct validity by ensuring that the factor extraction and factor confirmation are performed on different datasets. The suitability of the data for factor analysis was assessed using the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure and Bartlett’s test of sphericity. Factor retention was guided by the Kaiser–Guttman criterion (eigenvalues > 1) and the results of parallel analysis (Horn, 1965). The internal reliability of the extracted factors was examined using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, with values above 0.70 considered an acceptable threshold (Nunnally & Bernstein, 1994).
Based on the EFA results, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine the degree of correspondence between the empirical data and the proposed three-factor structure. Given the ordinal nature of the 5-point Likert items, the CFA model was estimated using the WLSMV estimator, which is recommended for categorical indicators, rather than Maximum Likelihood. Model fit was evaluated using several indices—χ2/df, Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI), Normed Fit Index (NFI), Incremental Fit Index (IFI), Relative Fit Index (RFI), and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA)—in accordance with the recommendations of Hu and Bentler (1999), who suggest that CFI and TLI values ≥ 0.90 and RMSEA ≤ 0.08 indicate a good model fit. Additionally, convergent validity was confirmed by calculating Composite Reliability (CR) and Average Variance Extracted (AVE), with CR ≥ 0.70 and AVE ≥ 0.50 considered acceptable thresholds (Fornell & Larcker, 1981).
To assess the comparability of the measurement model across gender, multigroup CFA was conducted. Full metric invariance was not supported; however, following the recommendations of Byrne et al. (1989), partial metric invariance was established by freeing the loadings of items S10 and S13. This allowed valid comparisons between male and female respondents.
To assess potential common method bias, Harman’s single-factor test was performed using an unrotated exploratory factor analysis including all 18 items. The first factor accounted for 58% of the total variance, which is slightly above the conventional 50% threshold; however, the one-factor solution demonstrated very poor fit (χ2(135) = 991.98, p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.118; TLI = 0.85). These results indicate that a single latent factor cannot adequately account for the covariance among the indicators. Therefore, the covariance structure is not driven by a dominant methodological factor, suggesting that common method bias is unlikely to pose a threat to the validity of the findings.
In the final phase, a binary logistic regression was conducted to examine the influence of socio-demographic characteristics and perceptual factors on the probability of purchasing traditional food from the Mačva region. This method allows for estimating the likelihood of occurrence of a specific category of the dependent variable (Hosmer et al., 2013). Two models were estimated: (1) a theory-driven model including all socio-demographic predictors and the three latent factors, and (2) an additional stepwise model selected using Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC), applied given the exploratory nature of the study. The model’s calibration was evaluated using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test, while its discriminatory ability was assessed through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Pseudo-R2 measures (Cox–Snell and Nagelkerke) were also reported to quantify the improvement over the null model.

4. Results

4.1. Analysis of the Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Respondents

The analysis began with descriptive statistics of the respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics (Table 1). The gender structure of the sample shows an almost even distribution, with men accounting for 47.2% and women for 52.8% of all participants. The largest share of respondents belongs to the 31–45 age group (39.3%), while the smallest proportion consists of individuals over 60 years of age (7.6%). Regarding place of residence, the sample is dominated by respondents from urban areas (80.8%), whereas those from rural areas constitute 19.2%. The educational structure indicates that most respondents hold a university degree or higher education (39.3%), while the smallest share consists of those with completed secondary education (23.6%). In terms of employment status, the majority are employed (71.0%), followed by students (12.9%), retirees (7.9%), and unemployed individuals (8.3%). With respect to monthly income, more than half of the respondents (53.1%) earn more than 91,000 RSD, whereas only 9.4% earn less than 46,360 RSD. This structure reflects a sample largely composed of economically active and educated individuals from urban environments.

4.2. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis

To gain a more detailed understanding of respondents’ perceptions regarding the current state and development potential of the GI of Mačva, a descriptive statistical analysis of responses to the formulated research statements was conducted. This analysis enables the identification of the general level of respondent agreement with individual statements, as well as insight into the dominant perceptions related to the recognizability, evaluation, and potential enhancement of the region’s gastronomic offer. The results of the descriptive statistics are presented in Table 2, which provides an overview of the key statistical parameters for each analyzed statement: the mean value (M) and standard deviation (SD). These indicators serve as the basis for identifying general trends in respondents’ answers, as well as for further interpretation and analysis of relationships among variables within the research model.
Based on the results presented in Table 2, it can be observed that respondents expressed the highest level of agreement with the statements that the gastronomic culture and tradition of the locality reflect the culture of the region (Mean = 3.90) and that the Mačva region is characterized by dishes and beverages with unique and recognizable local flavors (Mean = 3.88). A high level of agreement was also recorded for the statements that the region possesses a rich gastronomic heritage preserved by the local population (Mean = 3.87) and that Mačva has an authentic gastronomic culture and tradition (Mean = 3.86).
The lowest level of agreement was reported for the statements that food routes have been established in the region and are visited by tourists (Mean = 3.25) and that tourists have the opportunity to participate in the preparation of local dishes during their stay (Mean = 3.46), indicating potential for improving interactive tourism activities. The values of the standard deviations indicate moderate variability in responses, with the greatest variability observed for the statement regarding the existence of organized food routes (SD = 1.215), while the most consistent responses were recorded for the statement that the offer of local food is complemented by the courtesy of the staff (SD = 0.998).
To examine the structure and internal coherence of respondents’ attitudes regarding the gastronomic identity (GI) of the Mačva region, an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted. EFA was performed on a randomly selected 60% subsample (n = 274) to avoid inflating construct validity by using the full sample for both EFA and CFA.
Before conducting EFA, the suitability of the data for factorization was assessed. The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure indicated excellent sampling adequacy (KMO = 0.960), and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was statistically significant (χ2 = 3941.62, df = 153, p < 0.001), confirming that the correlation matrix was appropriate for factor extraction (Table 3).
To determine the optimal number of factors, a parallel analysis was conducted. Based on the intersection of the empirical and randomly generated eigenvalues, as well as the criterion of retaining eigenvalues greater than one (the Kaiser–Guttman criterion), it was established that three factors should be retained. This three-factor structure explains a total of 67% of the variance, indicating a strong ability of the identified factors to account for the relationships among the statements.
The Principal Axis Factoring (PAF) method was applied for the extraction of latent dimensions, with Oblimin rotation used to achieve a more interpretable structure, given the expected interdependence of the dimensions. For item retention, a minimum loading threshold of 0.30 was applied, and items were required to load substantially higher on their primary factor than on any other factor (cross-loadings < 0.30), in line with recommendations by Hair et al. (2019). The rotated factor loadings are presented in Table 4.
Based on the results presented in Table 4, a clearly distinguished and theoretically coherent three-factor structure emerged. The first factor consists of six statements reflecting the cultural and identity-related aspects of Mačva’s gastronomic heritage. The highest loadings were observed for statements such as “The gastronomic culture and tradition of the locality reflect the culture of the region” (0.838) and “Gastronomic culture and tradition reflect all the ethnic groups living in Mačva” (0.832), which emphasize the cultural rootedness and authenticity of the regional cuisine. Although some items refer to development-related outcomes, respondents appear to perceive these outcomes as an integral part of the cultural role of gastronomy within the region, rather than as purely economic attributes. This suggests that gastronomic heritage is understood not only as a symbolic cultural asset, but also as a socially embedded practice linked to local development. This factor can therefore be interpreted as Cultural–gastronomic heritage. The second factor comprises six statements connected to gastronomic events, the promotion of local products, and experiential aspects of tourism. High loadings were recorded for statements such as “There are agricultural households in the region that sell their products directly to tourists” (0.895) and “Presenting local agricultural, food, and gastronomic products at events contributes to establishing a concept of sustainable tourism in the region” (0.813). This dimension reflects respondents’ perceptions of gastronomy as both an experiential and promotional tool, and may be defined as Authenticity and promotion of gastronomy. The third factor captures the economic and developmental dimensions of gastronomy. The strongest indicator was “In their written menus, hospitality providers specifically highlight authentic and local gastronomic products” (0.906), followed by statements such as “Food routes have been established in the region, which tourists visit” (0.730). These findings underscore the economic and developmental role of gastronomy in supporting tourism growth and local cooperation. This factor may therefore be interpreted as Economic–social development. All three dimensions demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha values between 0.91 and 0.92, confirming the reliability and internal coherence of the extracted factors.
Following the exploratory factor analysis, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed on the second subsample to validate the three-factor structure. Given the ordinal nature of the 5-point Likert items, the model was estimated using the WLSMV estimator, which is recommended for categorical indicators. The CFA results demonstrated an excellent overall model fit, as shown in Table 5.
The confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated an excellent fit of the three-factor model to the data. The χ2/df ratio was 0.93, well below the recommended cutoff of 3.0, indicating a very good correspondence between the empirical and model-implied covariance matrices. Incremental fit indices also showed outstanding values (CFI = 1.000; TLI = 1.000; IFI = 1.000; NFI = 0.997; RFI = 0.996), all exceeding the commonly accepted threshold of 0.90. The absolute fit indices further support the adequacy of the model. The SRMR value (0.038) indicates a low level of residual error, while the RMSEA estimate was 0.000 (90% CI: 0.000–0.028), suggesting a close model fit. Overall, the combination of incremental and absolute fit indices confirms that the proposed three-factor structure demonstrates excellent statistical and theoretical adequacy. In addition to global model fit, Composite Reliability (CR) and Average Variance Extracted (AVE) were calculated to assess construct reliability and convergent validity, with the results presented in Table 6.
The high values of composite reliability (CR ranging from 0.928 to 0.939) indicate strong internal consistency of the measured items within each factor, while the AVE values (0.696–0.769) confirm that the latent constructs explain more than 60% of the variance of their indicators. This provides evidence of the convergent validity of the measurement model. The intercorrelations among the latent factors are positive and statistically significant (r = 0.83–0.86), which is consistent with theoretical expectations suggesting that the cultural, social, and economic dimensions of gastronomic tourism are interrelated. These results confirm that the three-factor model adequately describes respondents’ perceptions regarding the role of gastronomic identity in tourism development in the Mačva region. To complement the assessment of convergent validity (CR and AVE), discriminant validity was examined using the Heterotrait–Monotrait Ratio (HTMT). The HTMT matrix for the three factors identified in the CFA is presented in Table 7.
The HTMT values ranged from 0.56 to 0.60, substantially below the recommended threshold of 0.85, indicating strong discriminant validity among the three latent constructs. These results confirm that Cultural–gastronomic heritage, Authenticity and promotion of gastronomy, and Economic–social development represent empirically distinct but related dimensions of the gastronomic identity of the Mačva region.
Figure 2 presents the confirmed three-factor model, which includes the latent dimensions Cultural-gastronomic heritage (F1), Authenticity and promotion of gastronomy (F2), and Economic–social development (F3).
Each latent dimension is strongly associated with its corresponding manifest indicators, with all standardized loadings substantially exceeding the recommended 0.50 threshold and reaching high values (0.73–0.91), indicating excellent convergent validity. All loadings are statistically significant (p < 0.001), confirming that the observed variables reliably capture their intended constructs. The relationships among the latent constructs are positive, strong, and statistically significant. The highest correlation is observed between Cultural–gastronomic heritage (F1) and Authenticity and promotion of gastronomy (F2) (r = 0.86), followed by the correlations of F2 with Economic–social development (F3) (r = 0.85) and F1 with F3 (r = 0.83). This pattern demonstrates that the cultural, promotional, and socio-economic dimensions of gastronomic identity are deeply interconnected. Overall, these associations indicate that gastronomic identity in the Mačva region operates as an integrated system in which cultural heritage, authenticity, and socio-economic development reinforce one another, jointly contributing to the region’s tourism potential and sustainable development.
Full metric invariance was not supported (Δχ2 = 33.39, p = 0.004), indicating that several factor loadings differed across gender. Modification indices revealed that the largest sources of non-invariance were associated with items S10 and S13. Following the recommendations of Byrne et al. (1989), a partial metric invariance model was estimated in which the loadings F1 = ~S10, F3 = ~S10, and F2 = ~S13 were freely estimated across groups. The partial metric model showed no degradation in fit relative to the configural model (Δχ2 = 0, Δdf = 0, p = 1.00), supporting partial metric invariance. This indicates that, except for a small number of non-invariant items, the measurement structure is comparable across gender, allowing meaningful comparisons of latent factors between men and women.

4.3. Binary Logistic Regression

To examine the influence of socio-demographic characteristics and perceptual factors on consumers’ intention to purchase traditional food products from the Mačva region, a binary logistic regression analysis was conducted. The theory-driven model including all socio-demographic variables and perceptual factors was treated as the primary analytical model. The theoretical model included gender, age group, education level, employment status, monthly income, place of residence, as well as the three latent factors obtained through confirmatory factor analysis (socio-cultural, ecological, and economic–social). As a supplementary robustness check, an additional stepwise variable selection procedure based on Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) was applied to identify the most parsimonious subset of predictors. This approach retained only the predictors that significantly improved model fit, resulting in a simplified yet statistically robust model. The resulting model demonstrates good calibration, as indicated by the Hosmer–Lemeshow test (χ2 = 3.26, df = 8, p = 0.917), and shows an acceptable discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.64). The overall classification accuracy is 75.5%, confirming that the model adequately distinguishes respondents with higher and lower purchase intentions. Pseudo-R2 values (Cox–Snell R2 = 0.046; Nagelkerke R2 = 0.071) indicate modest but expected explanatory power for behavioral logistic models, serving primarily as measures of improvement over the null model. Multicollinearity diagnostics indicated no concern, as all Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) values were well below commonly accepted thresholds, confirming the stability of the regression estimates. The results of the stepwise model are presented in Table 8.
The results indicate that gender and the factor of economic–social development are statistically significant predictors of the intention to purchase traditional food. The economic–social development factor shows a positive and significant effect (B = 0.319, p = 0.020), meaning that higher perceptions of the economic and social contribution of gastronomic development increase the likelihood of purchasing traditional products. In terms of magnitude, respondents score 1.38 times higher odds of purchasing intention for each one-unit increase in this factor (95% CI: 1.05–1.80). Gender also demonstrates a significant influence (B = 0.464, p = 0.038), indicating that men are approximately 1.59 times more likely than women to express an intention to purchase traditional food (95% CI: 1.003–2.47). These findings confirm that, although perceptual factors exert a certain influence, socio-demographic characteristics primarily gender still play a key role in shaping consumers’ intentions to purchase traditional food products.

5. Discussion

GI represents an integration of cultural, historical, and social influences reflected in the ways food is produced, prepared, and consumed, making it one of the key forms of intangible cultural heritage (de Miguel Molina et al., 2016; Lin et al., 2021). According to Kalenjuk Pivarski et al. (2024a), the identification of GI factors that influence the development of food-based tourism is considerably facilitated by analyzing the attitudes of respondents who participated in the study. A more detailed analysis of the sample structure from the Mačva region shows that the largest share of respondents belongs to the 31–45 age group, and that the sample predominantly consists of economically active and educated individuals from urban areas.
The analysis of data related to the first research question (Q1) showed that respondents predominantly perceive the gastronomic culture and tradition of Mačva as an important reflection of the region’s cultural identity. Respondents emphasized the uniqueness and recognizability of local flavors, as well as the richness of the gastronomic heritage that the local population actively preserves. These results are consistent with the findings of Lin et al. (2021) and Ellis et al. (2018), who identify gastronomy as one of the main indicators of a destination’s cultural identity, with local food serving as a key symbol of cultural authenticity and distinctiveness.
Although gastronomic routes and event-based and participatory gastronomic activities, have already been recognized as priority directions of development (Suna & Alvarez, 2019; Kalenjuk Pivarski et al., 2024a), the results indicate that these segments are still insufficiently developed and insufficiently recognized. Similar findings have been reported in studies conducted in geographically comparable areas (Paunić et al., 2024; Kalenjuk Pivarski et al., 2024a), where it was established that opportunities for visitors to actively participate in the preparation of local dishes remain limited. These insights point to the need for the region to intensify efforts in developing food routes and interactive experiences. As Ellis et al. (2018) notes, food and food-related activities represent a key component of the tourism offer, making it essential to understand their role as a selling point in tourism marketing and destination management strategies.
The perception of Mačva’s GI fully confirms its authenticity and recognizability within the region’s gastronomic offer. There is no doubt that local food represents an essential element of sustainable tourism and one of the key indicators of the authenticity of local culture (Zhang et al., 2019). Accordingly, local restaurants are encouraged to highlight the diversity of dishes and the use of various ingredients in order to attract visitors (Kim et al., 2022). Mačva is perceived as a region with unique and recognizable local flavors of food and beverages, suggesting a clearly established awareness of the importance of gastronomy as part of cultural identity. These results are consistent with the findings of Kalenjuk Pivarski et al. (2024a), who emphasize that authentic gastronomic heritage is one of the key pillars in shaping a region’s gastronomic identity. In addition, respondents pointed out that the courtesy and approachability of the staff significantly enhance the overall visitor experience, which aligns with the findings of Alhelalat et al. (2017), showing that personal aspects of service and the quality of interaction have a strong impact on guest satisfaction and their intention to revisit. The combination of an authentic gastronomic offer and high-quality service emerges as one of the most important factors in building a positive image of the GI of Mačva.
The obtained results indicate that tourists perceive cultural tradition, local products, and gastronomic events as key elements through which the region’s gastronomic identity is constructed. This supports the first hypothesis (H1) and confirms that these elements play a central role in shaping the region’s gastronomic identity from the perspective of visitors.
To address the second research question (Q2), the analysis of the collected data indicates the existence of a three-dimensional structure of the GI of the Mačva region, encompassing the factors of cultural–gastronomic heritage, authenticity and promotion of gastronomy, and economic–social development. This structure aligns with contemporary theoretical and empirical insights on the nature of GI in the context of tourism development.
The first factor, labeled cultural–gastronomic heritage, comprises elements related to the authenticity of the local cuisine, the preservation of tradition, and the recognizability of the region through its gastronomy. These findings are consistent with studies by Rivza et al. (2022) and Paunić et al. (2024), which indicate that gastronomic heritage is not only part of the tourism offer but also an important aspect of everyday diet that contributes to the preservation of cultural identity and the sustainable development of local communities. The results confirm that gastronomic heritage functions as a key cultural resource that contributes to the construction and strengthening of regional identity. This is in line with the findings of Lin et al. (2021), Paunić et al. (2024), and Kalenjuk Pivarski et al. (2024a), who emphasize that gastronomy represents an important cultural resource and a tool for enhancing regional recognizability.
The second factor, labeled authenticity and promotion of gastronomy, reflects the importance of gastronomic events and the promotion of local products as mechanisms for preserving and enhancing the region’s GI. These findings are consistent with the research of Kalenjuk Pivarski et al. (2024a) and Yang et al. (2020), with Yang et al. (2020) noting that the successful promotion of a destination through gastronomic events depends on visitors’ motivation and the extent of their prior knowledge about the event. In this context, social interactions emerge as a key mechanism for strengthening cultural identity and increasing the visibility of the region. This result aligns with the findings of Rachão et al. (2019, 2020), who emphasize that activities such as gastronomic workshops, collaborative food preparation, and direct interaction with local producers contribute to co-creating the experience, increasing tourists’ willingness to pay for such activities, and fostering destination loyalty.
The third factor, labeled Economic–social development, relates to the economic and developmental aspects of the region’s gastronomic offer. These findings align with studies indicating that gastronomy represents an important driver of economic growth and regional tourism attractiveness, with the authenticity and quality of local products emerging as key development factors (Kalenjuk Pivarski et al., 2024b). The importance of cooperation between hospitality providers and the local community is particularly emphasized, which is also confirmed by Đurkin Badurina et al. (2023), who note that limitations in this cooperation and the insufficient development of food routes reduce the region’s recognizability. The introduction of systems for labeling local products and the development of thematic gastronomic routes represent important mechanisms for increasing the visibility and economic impact of gastronomy (Duda, 2024), as demonstrated by examples from other countries such as the “wine route” in Poland (Jęczmyk, 2019) and the “olive route” in Spain (Folgado-Fernández et al., 2019). The proposed three-factor structure is fully consistent with the findings of Paunić et al. (2024), who note that the factors shaping GI encompass the geographical and cultural characteristics of the region. The results are also compatible with research by Grubor et al. (2022) and Kalenjuk Pivarski et al. (2024a), which emphasize that ethnic cuisines, local recipes, and gastro-tourism events (Kalenjuk Pivarski et al., 2023) constitute key elements of cultural authenticity. Although gastronomy possesses substantial cultural and developmental potential, several authors (Leoti et al., 2023) point out that, in practice, it is still insufficiently recognized within the economic, social, and political development strategies of destinations.
The factor structure thus confirms the existence of a three-dimensional model of the region’s GI heritage, authenticity and promotion, and economic–social development. These results indicate that the cultural and economic dimensions of gastronomy are perceived as interrelated and complementary components of destination identity formation, thereby supporting the second hypothesis (H2), which proposes a three-factor structure of the region’s GI: cultural and gastronomic heritage, the authenticity and promotion of gastronomy, and economic and social dimensions of development.
To address the final research question (Q3), an analysis was conducted to examine the influence of socio-demographic and perceptual factors on the likelihood of purchasing traditional food. The results revealed that gender is a statistically significant predictor, with men being more inclined to purchase traditional products than women. This finding partially departs from studies suggesting that women are more involved in gastronomic activities and culinary tourism (Okumus et al., 2021; Šmugović et al., 2025), but aligns with research confirming the existence of gender-based differences in consumer behavior (Vlontzos et al., 2018). In the context of the Mačva region, this may reflect local cultural and social behavior patterns, in which men exhibit a greater propensity for direct purchasing of traditional products and participation in market-related activities. The economic–social development factor demonstrated a positive and statistically significant effect on purchase intention, indicating that tourists who perceive gastronomy as an element contributing to the broader economic and social development of the region are more likely to purchase traditional products. The obtained findings are supported by previous studies (Kalenjuk Pivarski et al., 2023, 2024b; Moura et al., 2025), which indicate that the perception of gastronomy as a factor contributing to the economic and social development of a destination positively influences tourist behavior, particularly their propensity to purchase traditional products, in this context, economic aspects, including the generation of additional income for the local community, improvements in living standards, and the encouragement of sustainable forms of agricultural production, are recognized as significant incentives for both tourists and stakeholders in the hospitality sector. Although previous research suggests that socio-demographic characteristics such as age (Yılmaz, 2023; Vlontzos et al., 2018), education level (Yılmaz, 2023), and income (Defta et al., 2025) may influence tourist consumption behavior, in the present study these socio-demographic characteristics, except for gender, as well as certain perceptual dimensions, did not demonstrate a statistically significant influence on the intention to purchase traditional products. These findings indicate that purchase intention is not determined by the general tourist profile, but rather by specific value-based attitudes and perceptions related to gastronomy and its developmental significance.
The obtained results further indicate that socio-demographic and perceptual factors partially influence the intention to purchase traditional food products during a tourist visit. Although both gender and the economic–social development factor are statistically significant predictors, gender appears to exert a relatively stronger effect on purchase intention, thereby partially confirming the third hypothesis (H3).

6. Conclusions

In line with the research findings and with the aim of addressing the first research question (Q1), the results indicate that domestic tourists perceive the GI of the Mačva region as a synthesis of cultural, economic, and social elements that shape the destination’s overall tourist attractiveness. According to tourists’ perceptions, the region is characterized by a distinct gastronomic heritage, in which local flavors and traditional food preparation techniques constitute the core of cultural authenticity. From the tourists’ perspective, the gastronomy of Mačva reflects the cultural identity of the local community, while the combination of tradition, locally sourced products, and direct interaction with hosts emerges as a key determinant in the formation of a positive destination image. At the same time, tourists identify an insufficient level of development of gastronomic routes and limited opportunities for interactive engagement in the preparation of traditional dishes, which are not directly supported by the empirical model.
In this context, the findings suggest that Mačva possesses substantial potential for development as a gastronomic destination, based on the integration of gastronomic heritage with contemporary gastronomic trends; however, these recommendations are normative and not fully confirmed by the statistical analysis. The development of gastronomic routes, the design of integrated programs connecting local producers, hospitality providers, and cultural institutions, as well as the active involvement of tourists in the preparation and tasting of traditional dishes, represent practical suggestions that require further empirical verification to assess their actual impact on tourist behavior and destination recognition.
Regarding Q2,the results indicate that the GI of the region is shaped by a combination of cultural, social, and economic factors. The analysis of GI factors confirms the existence of a clearly defined model that integrates cultural heritage, authenticity and gastronomic promotion, and economic–social development. Cultural–gastronomic heritage represents the foundation of Mačva’s identity, encompassing the preservation of tradition, local cuisine, and the symbolic representation of the region through food. Authenticity and the promotion of gastronomy through social interaction emerge as key mechanisms for strengthening cultural identity and destination recognition. At the same time, economic–social development contributes to creating conditions for a sustainable gastronomic offer by fostering cooperation between hospitality providers and local producers, thereby supporting the growth of the region’s tourism sector. The GI of the region should function as an integrated system that connects cultural, social, and economic functions within a unified developmental pathway. As a dynamic concept, the GI unites cultural tradition and economic interests in a way that enhances tourism competitiveness. Mačva, as a region with a rich gastronomic heritage, has the capacity to position itself through innovative approaches to gastronomic tourism as an authentic and sustainable destination that successfully combines tradition and development.
In response to the third research question (Q3), the obtained results indicate that tourists’ intention to purchase traditional food products during a tourist visit is not determined exclusively by their general socio-demographic profile, but rather by selective personal characteristics and subjective perceptions regarding the role of gastronomy in destination development. Among the socio-demographic factors, gender emerges as a statistically significant predictor, indicating that individual tourist characteristics condition the way in which the region’s gastronomic identity is translated into concrete consumer behavior. At the same time, perceptual factors influence purchase intention primarily through value-based attitudes that view gastronomy as a resource for the region’s economic and social development. Tourists who recognize the broader developmental significance of gastronomy show a greater willingness to support local producers through the purchase of traditional products, highlighting the connection between consumer decisions and the broader social and economic context of the destination. In contrast, other socio-demographic characteristics, such as age, education level, and income, as well as certain perceptual dimensions of gastronomic identity, did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect. These findings confirm that purchase intention is not the result of general tourist profiling, but rather of individually formed value orientations and perceptions related to the developmental role of gastronomy.

6.1. Theoretical Implications

Local tradition and cultural authenticity are recognized as key elements of the region’s GI; however, it is essential to systematically integrate them through the development of gastronomic activities and comprehensive tourism programs. It is advisable to design tourism packages that include visits to local producers and the purchase of traditional products, workshops on the preparation of traditional dishes, tasting events, and culturally oriented activities. Strengthening cooperation between local hospitality providers and producers enhances the interactivity and authenticity of the tourist experience, thereby positioning the region as a distinctive gastronomic destination. Given that gastronomy represents a symbolic expression of local identity, it is necessary to develop a unique regional brand based on the GI model and to introduce geographical indications for characteristic products. A visual identity that links food with cultural heritage contributes to building the region’s image and reinforcing consumer trust in the quality of local offerings. The application of the three-dimensional GI model heritage, authenticity and promotion, and economic–social development can thus serve as a mechanism for achieving economic progress in the region. Consumers tend to approach traditional food pragmatically and subjectively, which requires marketing strategies grounded in emotion, experiential value, and authenticity. For this purpose, market segmentation based on consumer motives is essential, as it enables the adaptation of gastronomic offerings to the specific needs of each segment. Continuous research on tourist perceptions of the quality and value of local products further supports the region’s strategic positioning and helps guide future marketing activities.

6.2. Suggestions for Future Research

The present study focused on domestic tourists; therefore, future research should consider including samples of international visitors to identify potential differences in the perception of the region’s GI and to explore the specific cultural determinants that shape their attitudes and motivations. A comparison between domestic and foreign tourists would provide a deeper understanding of how gastronomy functions as an element of cultural exchange and a driver of tourist attractiveness. Such research approaches would contribute to the development of more targeted promotional strategies aimed at international markets, as the valorization of gastronomic heritage can substantially influence the attraction of foreign visitors and support the positioning of Mačva as a recognizable gastronomic destination. Nonetheless, the findings of this study offer a valuable empirical foundation for further and more comprehensive research in the field of gastronomic tourism and the development of cultural identity in tourism destinations.

6.3. Research Limitations

The study is geographically confined to the Mačva region, which limits the extent to which the findings can be generalized. The region’s geographical and cultural specificities may influence the perception of GI and thereby restrict the applicability of the results to other destinations. Including multiple regions in future research would enable the identification of variations in gastronomic patterns, levels of authenticity, and different models of gastronomic branding. Such an approach would contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of GI as a factor of sustainable destination development and would allow for the formulation of more universal guidelines applicable to broader tourism development contexts.
In addition to the geographical limitation, several methodological limitations should be acknowledged. The study is based on self-reported data, which may be subject to socially desirable responses. Furthermore, the cross-sectional design does not allow for causal inference. Data collection in tourist centers and during events may have introduced sample bias by over-representing visitors with a higher interest in local gastronomy. Finally, the binary nature of the dependent variable (yes/no) may have led to an imbalance between response categories. These limitations should be considered when interpreting the results and suggest directions for future research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.V.P. and B.K.P.; methodology, A.V.P.; D.N.; software, B.K.P.; validation, A.V.P., B.K.P., D.I.U., S.Š. and V.I.; formal analysis, A.V.P.; investigation, A.V.P.; resources, A.V.P.; data curation, V.I. and T.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.V.P.; writing—review and editing, A.V.P., S.Š. and D.N.; visualization, D.I.U.; supervision, S.Š.; project administration, B.K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the national Law on Personal Data Protection (The Official Gazzette of the Republic of Serbia, number 97/08).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Alhelalat, J. A., Habiballah, M. A., & Twaissi, N. M. (2017). The impact of personal and functional aspects of restaurant employee service behaviour on customer satisfaction. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 66, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Arana, C. D. P., & Zúñiga, E. M. (2022). How to define gastronomic identity from cultural studies: The Peruvian case. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 27, 100476. [Google Scholar]
  3. Baby, J., & Joseph, A. G. (2023). Tourists’ perceptions and motivations for local food. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 5(5), 160. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bortolotto, C., & Ubertazzi, B. (2018). Editorial: Foodways as intangible cultural heritage. International Journal of Cultural Property, 25, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chukwurah, G., Okeke, F., Isimah, M., Enoguanbhor, E., Awe, F., Nnaemeka-Okeke, R., Guo, S., Nwafor, I., & Okeke, C. (2025). Cultural influence of local food heritage on sustainable development. World, 6(1), 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  8. Defta, N., Barbu, A., Ion, V. A., Pogurschi, E. N., Osman, A., Cune, L.-C., & Bădulescu, L. A. (2025). Exploring the relationship between socio-demographic factors and consumers’ perception of food promotions in Romania. Foods, 14, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. de Miguel Molina, M., de Miguel Molina, B., Santamarina-Campos, V., & Segarra Oña, M. V. (2016). Intangible heritage and gastronomy: The impact of UNESCO gastronomy elements. Journal of Culinary Science & Technology, 14(4), 293–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dias, A., & Posheliuznaia, A. (2025). The flavor of place: Examining the impact of authentic local cuisine on tourist satisfaction and destination loyalty. The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 31(2), 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Di Pietro, L., Guglielmetti Mugion, R., & Renzi, M. F. (2018). Heritage and identity: Technology, values and visitor experiences. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 13(2), 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Duda, T. (2024). Culinary heritage routes as a part of regional identity and original tourist product. European Research Studies Journal, 27(3), 1424–1431. [Google Scholar]
  13. Đurkin Badurina, J., Klapan, M., & Soldić Frleta, D. (2023). Stakeholders’ collaboration in the development of an authentic gastronomic offering in rural areas: Example of the Ravni Kotari Region in Croatia. Sustainability, 15(5), 4649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ellis, A., Park, E., Kim, S., & Yeoman, I. (2018). What is food tourism? Tourism Management, 68, 250–263. [Google Scholar]
  15. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar]
  16. Folgado-Fernández, J. A., Di-Clemente, E., & Hernández-Mogollón, J. M. (2019). Food festivals and the development of sustainable destinations: The case of the Cheese Fair in Trujillo (Spain). Sustainability, 11(10), 2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fontefrancesco, M., & Zocchi, D. (2020). Reviving traditional food knowledge through food festivals: The case of the Pink Asparagus Festival in Mezzago, Italy. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 596028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. [Google Scholar]
  19. González, A. F., Curtis, C., Washburn, I. J., & Shirsat, A. R. (2020). Factors in tourists’ food decision processes: A US-based case study. Journal of Tourism Analysis: Revista de AnálisisTurístico, 27(1), 2–19. [Google Scholar]
  20. Grubor, B., Kalenjuk Pivarski, B., Ðerčan, B., Tešanović, D., Banjac, M., Lukić, T., Živković, M. B., Udovičić, D. I., Šmugović, S., Ivanović, V., Ćirić, M., & Ćirić, I. (2022). Traditional and authentic food of ethnic groups of Vojvodina (Northern Serbia)—Preservation and potential for tourism development. Sustainability, 14, 1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Güleç, H., & Yılmaz, İ. (2023). A gastronomical product in Bursa cuisine: Orhangazi Gedelek pickles. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 31, 100857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gündüz, C., Rezaei, M., Quaglia, R., & Pironti, M. (2024). Culinary tourism: Exploring cultural diplomacy through gastronomy festivals in Turkey and Italy. British Food Journal, 126(7), 2621–2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  24. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hurdawaty, R., Dahana, W. D., & Farradia, Y. (2025). Understanding revisit intention in local culinary tourism: The mediating role of memorable culinary tourism experience and destination image. Tourism and Hospitality, 6(4), 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jęczmyk, A. (2019). Winnicejako element polskiegodziedzictwakulturowegonaterenachwiejskich [Vineyards as an element of Polish cultural heritage in rural areas]. Zagadnienia Doradztwa Rolniczego, 3, 127–138. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kalenjuk Pivarski, B., Grubor, B., Banjac, M., Ðerčan, B., Tešanović, D., Šmugović, S., Radivojević, G., Ivanović, V., Vujasinović, V., & Stošić, T. (2023). The sustainability of gastronomic heritage and its significance for regional tourism development. Heritage, 6(4), 3402–3417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kalenjuk Pivarski, B., Paunić, M., Šarenac, N., Šmugović, S., Mlinarević, P., Ivanović, V., Marjanović, J., Pavlović, S., Tekić, D., Ðerčan, B., Tešanović, D., & Jaraković, S. (2024a). The influence of gastronomic identity factors on food tourism development in the Republic of Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Frontiers in Nutrition, 10, 1335943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kalenjuk Pivarski, B., Tešanović, D., Šmugović, S., Ivanović, V., Paunić, M., Vojnović, D., Vujasinović, V., & Jaraković, S. (2024b). Gastronomy as a predictor of tourism development—Defining food-related factors from the perspective of hospitality and tourism employees in Srem (A.P. Vojvodina, R. Serbia). Sustainability, 16, 10834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kapitány, Á., & Kapitány, G. (2024). The semiotics of gastronomy—Meals and identity. Acta Ethnographica Hungarica, 68(1), 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kestwal, A., Verma, S., & Chamoli, A. (2025). From intention to action: Factors shaping tourist decisions to experience local food. PUSA Journal of Hospitality and Applied Sciences, 11(1), 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, S. S., Choe, J. Y. J., King, B., Oh, M. M., & Otoo, F. E. (2022). Tourist perceptions of local food: A mapping of cultural values. International Journal of Tourism Research, 24(1), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kladou, S., & Trihas, N. (2022). Place branding through resource integration and gastro-cultural experiences: A transnational perspective. Tourism and Hospitality, 3, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Komariah, K., Razzaq, A., Nugraheni, M., Lastariwati, B., & Mahfud, T. (2020). The antecedent factor of tourists’ intention to consume traditional food. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites, 32, 403–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kovalenko, A., Dias, Á., Pereira, L., & Simões, A. (2023). Gastronomic experience and consumer behavior: Analyzing the influence on destination image. Foods, 12, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lee, K. (2023). Cooking up food memories: A taste of intangible cultural heritage. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 54, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Leoti, A., dos Anjos, F. A., & Costa, R. (2023). Creative territory and gastronomy: Cultural, economic, and political dimensions of tourism in historic Brazilian cities. Sustainability, 15, 5844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lin, M.-P., Marine-Roig, E., & Llonch-Molina, N. (2021). Gastronomy as a sign of the identity and cultural heritage of tourist destinations: A bibliometric analysis 2001–2020. Sustainability, 13, 12531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Local strategy for rural development: Mačvanskaravnica 2020–2023. (2020). Available online: https://www.arrsm.rs/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/LSRR_Macvanska-ravnica-2020-2023.pdf (accessed on 30 October 2025).
  42. Mačva district—Official internet presentation. (n.d.). Available online: http://macvanski.okrug.gov.rs/ (accessed on 4 November 2025).
  43. Moura, A., Mira, M., & Teixeira, A. (2025). The tourist gastronomic experience: Ties between young foodies’ motivation and destination development in Portugal. Tourism and Hospitality, 6(1), 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Noguer-Juncà, E., Crespi-Vallbona, M., & Fusté-Forné, F. (2021). Sociocultural and gastronomic revaluation of local products: Trumfa in the Vall de Camprodon (Catalonia, Spain). International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 26, 100425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  46. Okumus, B., Shi, F., & Dedeoğlu, S. (2021). What is the role of demographics in tourists’ attitudes towards foods? Journal of Gastronomy and Tourism, 5(4), 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ondieki, E. (2025). Gastronomic identity: A review of the environment, culture and economy effect on culinary tourism. African Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management, 4(1), 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Partarakis, N., Kaplanidi, D., Doulgeraki, P., Karuzaki, E., Petraki, A., Metilli, D., Bartalesi, V., Adami, I., Meghini, C., & Zabulis, X. (2021). Representation and presentation of culinary tradition as cultural heritage. Heritage, 4, 612–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Paunić, M., Kalenjuk Pivarski, B., Tešanović, D., Novaković, D., Šmugović, S., Šarenac, N., Ivanović, V., Mlinarević, P., & Marjanović, J. (2024). Gastronomic identity factors in the function of sustainable gastronomy: A case study of tourist destinations in the Republic of Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sustainability, 16, 8493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Qiu, Q., Zuo, Y., & Zhang, M. (2022). Intangible cultural heritage in tourism: Research review and investigation of future agenda. Land, 11, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rachão, S., Breda, Z., Fernandes, C., & Joukes, V. (2019). Food tourism and regional development: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Tourism Research, 21(1), 33–49. [Google Scholar]
  52. Rachão, S., Breda, Z., Fernandes, C., & Joukes, V. (2020). Cocreation of tourism experiences: Are food-related activities being explored? British Food Journal, 122(3), 910–928. [Google Scholar]
  53. Rivza, B., Foris, D., Foris, T., Privitera, D., Uljanova, E., & Rivza, P. (2022). Gastronomic heritage: A contributor to sustainable local tourism development. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites, 44(4), 1326–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sengel, T., Karagoz, A., Cetin, G., Dincer, F., Ertuğral, S., & Balik, M. (2015). Tourists’ approach to local food. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Silva, F. M., Ramazanova, M., & Freitas, I. V. (2025). Safeguarding traditional Portuguese gastronomy as an intangible cultural heritage through tourism: The case of North of Portugal. Tourism and Hospitality, 6(2), 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Singh, R., Mir, M. A., & Nazki, A. A. (2024). Evaluation of tourist behavior towards traditional food consumption: Validation of extended theory of planned behaviour. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2298893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Suna, B., & Alvarez, M. D. (2019). Gastronomic identity of Gaziantep: Perceptions of tourists and residents. An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 7, 167–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Suna, B., & Alvarez, M. D. (2021). The role of gastronomy in shaping the destination’s brand identity: An empirical analysis based on stakeholders’ opinions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 30(6), 738–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sutiadiningsih, A., Purwidiani, N., Dewi, I., Hamdani, A., & Le, H. (2023). Gastronomic experience as a motivation for tourists to choose tourist destinations in Indonesia and Vietnam. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites, 47, 208–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Šmugović, S., Kalenjuk Pivarski, B., Novaković, D., Ivanović, V., Novaković, T., Nikolić, S., Mihajlović, M., & Mirčevski, M. (2025). The influence of consumers’ socio-demographic characteristics on the perception of quality and attributes of traditional food products in the hospitality and tourism market of AP Vojvodina (Republic of Serbia). Tourism and Hospitality, 6(4), 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Türker, N., & Süzer, Ö. (2021). Tourists’ food and beverage consumption trends in the context of culinary movements: The case of Safranbolu. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 26, 100463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Verner, V., Kosova, M., Chaloupkova, P., Nguon, S., Van Damme, P., & Kokoska, L. (2023). Tourists’ preferences for traditional food products as indicators of the market potential of underutilised species in Cambodia. Agriculture, 13, 1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Vlontzos, G., Kyrgiakos, L., & Duquenne, M. N. (2018). What are the main drivers of young consumers purchasing traditional food products? European field research. Foods, 7(2), 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yang, F., Wong, I., Tan, X., & Wu, D. (2020). The role of food festivals in branding culinary destinations. Tourism Management Perspectives, 34, 100671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yılmaz, B. (2023). Factors influencing consumers’ behaviour towards purchasing organic foods: A theoretical model. Sustainability, 15(20), 14895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, T., Chen, J., & Hu, B. (2019). Authenticity, quality, and loyalty: Local food and sustainable tourism experience. Sustainability, 11(12), 3437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geographic overview of the Mačva District. Source: authors’ analysis.
Figure 1. Geographic overview of the Mačva District. Source: authors’ analysis.
Tourismhosp 07 00021 g001
Figure 2. The results of confirmatory factor analysis.
Figure 2. The results of confirmatory factor analysis.
Tourismhosp 07 00021 g002
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics of the Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Respondents.
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics of the Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Respondents.
VariableCategoryN%
GenderMale21647.2
Female24252.8
Age18–30 years13228.8
31–45 years18039.3
46–60 years11124.2
60 years and above357.6
Place of residenceUrban37080.8
Rural8819.2
Highest level of
education
Secondary school10823.6
College9921.6
University degree18039.3
Master’s/PhD studies7115.5
Employment statusEmployed32571.0
Unemployed388.3
Student5912.9
Retired367.9
Monthly income (RSD)≤46,360.00439.4
43,361.00–71,000.00388.3
71,001.00–91,000.0013429.3
>91,000.0024353.1
Source: authors’ analysis.
Table 2. Descriptive Statistics of Items on the Current State and Potential for Development.
Table 2. Descriptive Statistics of Items on the Current State and Potential for Development.
StatementMeanStd. Deviation
S1The geographical characteristics of the Mačva region are utilized in creating an authentic gastronomic offer. 3.6331.156
S2Mačva has an authentic gastronomic culture and tradition.3.8561.021
S3The Mačva region is characterized by dishes and beverages with unique and recognizable local flavors. 3.8781.058
S4 Gastronomic culture and tradition reflect all the ethnic groups living in Mačva.3.8361.055
S5The gastronomic culture and tradition of the locality reflect the culture of the region.3.9041.005
S6The region has a rich gastronomic heritage that is preserved by the local population.3.8711.059
S7Gastronomic events are organized here where local Mačva products are presented.3.6881.109
S8During their stay in the region, tourists have the opportunity to participate in the preparation of local dishes. 3.4631.161
S9The gastronomic events of Mačva contribute to the branding of local gastronomy.3.6941.074
S10When visiting gastronomic events, tourists become acquainted with the gastronomic culture and tradition of the region in which they are staying. 3.7641.065
S11There are agricultural households in the region that sell their products directly to tourists. 3.7951.086
S12Presenting local agricultural, food, and gastronomic products at events contributes to establishing a concept of sustainable tourism in the region. 3.8491.032
S13The food offered in Mačva’s restaurants is local and authentic.3.6551.076
S14In their written menus, hospitality providers specifically highlight authentic and local gastronomic products. 3.4981.115
S15The offer of local food is complemented by the courtesy of the service staff. 3.7600.998
S16The region has an attractive gastronomic culture and tradition that contribute to the development of the hospitality and tourism sector. 3.6351.036
S17Food routes have been established in the region, which tourists visit. 3.2531.215
S18Hospitality providers positively perceive and support gastronomic activities that take place outside the hospitality venue. 3.5761.103
Source: authors’ analysis.
Table 3. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s test of justification of factor analysis.
Table 3. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s test of justification of factor analysis.
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy.0.960
Bartlett’s Test of SphericityApprox. Chi-Square3941.62
df153
Sig.0.000
Source: authors’ analysis.
Table 4. Factor loading after rotation.
Table 4. Factor loading after rotation.
LabelStatementFactor 1Factor 2Factor 3
S5The gastronomic culture and tradition of the locality reflect the culture of the region.0.838
S4Gastronomic culture and tradition reflect all the ethnic groups living in Mačva.0.832
S3The Mačva region is characterized by dishes and beverages with unique and recognizable local flavors.0.802
S2Mačva has an authentic gastronomic culture and tradition.0.747
S6The region has a rich gastronomic heritage that is preserved by the local population.0.605
S1The geographical characteristics of the Mačva region are utilized in creating an authentic gastronomic offer.0.510
S11There are agricultural households in the region that sell their products directly to tourists. 0.895
S12Presenting local agricultural, food, and gastronomic products at events contributes to establishing a concept of sustainable tourism in the region. 0.813
S9The gastronomic events of Mačva contribute to the branding of local gastronomy. 0.764
S10When visiting gastronomic events, tourists become acquainted with the gastronomic culture and tradition of the region in which they are staying. 0.664
S7Gastronomic events are organized here where local Mačva products are presented. 0.612
S8During their stay in the region, tourists have the opportunity to participate in the preparation of local dishes. 0.503
S14In their written menus, hospitality providers specifically highlight authentic and local gastronomic products. 0.906
S17Food routes have been established in the region, which tourists visit. 0.730
S13The food offered in Mačva’s restaurants is local and authentic. 0.726
S18Hospitality providers positively perceive and support gastronomic activities that take place outside the hospitality venue. 0.683
S16The region has an attractive gastronomic culture and tradition that contribute to the development of the hospitality and tourism sector. 0.521
S15The offer of local food is complemented by the courtesy of the service staff. 0.322
Cronbach’s Alpha 0.920.9210.91
Source: authors’ analysis.
Table 5. Fit Indices of the CFA Model.
Table 5. Fit Indices of the CFA Model.
IndexLabelValueRecommended Limit Value *
Chi-square/dfχ2/df0.93<3.00
Comparative Fit IndexCFI1.000≥0.90
Tucker–Lewis IndexTLI1.000≥0.90
Normed Fit IndexNFI0.997≥0.90
Incremental Fit IndexIFI1.000≥0.90
Relative Fit IndexRFI0.996≥0.90
Root Mean Square Error of ApproximationRMSEA0.000 (CI: 0.000–0.028)≤0.08
Standardized Root Mean Square ResidualSRMR0.038≤0.08
* According to: Hu and Bentler (1999); Source: authors’ analysis.
Table 6. Composite Reliability (CR) and Average Variance Extracted (AVE).
Table 6. Composite Reliability (CR) and Average Variance Extracted (AVE).
FactorCRAVE
F1—Cultural–gastronomic heritage0.9390.769
F2—Authenticity and promotion of gastronomy0.9280.717
F3—Economic–social development0.9180.696
Source: authors’ analysis.
Table 7. HTMT of Correlations.
Table 7. HTMT of Correlations.
FactorF1F2F3
F1—Cultural–gastronomic heritage1.0000.6020.566
F2—Authenticity and promotion of gastronomy0.6021.0000.594
F3—Economic–social development0.5660.5941.000
Source: authors’ analysis.
Table 8. Logit model results.
Table 8. Logit model results.
VariableBS.E.WaldSig.Exp(B)95% CI za Exp(B)
Economic–Social Development0.3190.1372.3330.0201.381.05–1.80
Gender (1 = male)0.4640.2232.0830.04371.591.003–2.47
Constant0.9130.1526.0010.0002.49
Source: authors’ analysis.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Popović, A.V.; Kalenjuk Pivarski, B.; Ilić Udovičić, D.; Šmugović, S.; Ivanović, V.; Stošić, T.; Novakovic, D. Gastronomic Identity of Mačva (Western Serbia): Perceptions, Determining Factors, and the Influence on Domestic Tourists’ Purchases of Traditional Food. Tour. Hosp. 2026, 7, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp7010021

AMA Style

Popović AV, Kalenjuk Pivarski B, Ilić Udovičić D, Šmugović S, Ivanović V, Stošić T, Novakovic D. Gastronomic Identity of Mačva (Western Serbia): Perceptions, Determining Factors, and the Influence on Domestic Tourists’ Purchases of Traditional Food. Tourism and Hospitality. 2026; 7(1):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp7010021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Popović, Aleksandra Vasić, Bojana Kalenjuk Pivarski, Dragana Ilić Udovičić, Stefan Šmugović, Velibor Ivanović, Tamara Stošić, and Dragana Novakovic. 2026. "Gastronomic Identity of Mačva (Western Serbia): Perceptions, Determining Factors, and the Influence on Domestic Tourists’ Purchases of Traditional Food" Tourism and Hospitality 7, no. 1: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp7010021

APA Style

Popović, A. V., Kalenjuk Pivarski, B., Ilić Udovičić, D., Šmugović, S., Ivanović, V., Stošić, T., & Novakovic, D. (2026). Gastronomic Identity of Mačva (Western Serbia): Perceptions, Determining Factors, and the Influence on Domestic Tourists’ Purchases of Traditional Food. Tourism and Hospitality, 7(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp7010021

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop