Previous Issue
Volume 5, September
 
 

Gases, Volume 5, Issue 4 (December 2025) – 2 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
28 pages, 3042 KB  
Review
Experimental and Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Interfacial Tension Measurements in CO2–Brine/Oil Systems: A Literature Review
by Nadieh Salehi, Mohammad Kazemi, Mohammad Amin Esmaeilbeig, Abbas Helalizadeh and Mehdi Bahari Moghaddam
Gases 2025, 5(4), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/gases5040023 - 16 Oct 2025
Abstract
Carbon dioxide (CO2), a major greenhouse gas, contributes significantly to global warming and environmental degradation. Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) is a promising strategy to mitigate atmospheric CO2 levels. One widely applied utilization approach involves injecting captured CO2 [...] Read more.
Carbon dioxide (CO2), a major greenhouse gas, contributes significantly to global warming and environmental degradation. Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) is a promising strategy to mitigate atmospheric CO2 levels. One widely applied utilization approach involves injecting captured CO2 into depleted oil reservoirs to enhance oil recovery—a technique known as CO2-Enhanced Oil Recovery (CO2-EOR). The effectiveness of CO2-EOR largely depends on complex rock–fluid interactions, including mass transfer, wettability alteration, capillary pressure, and interfacial tension (IFT). Various factors, such as the presence of asphaltenes, salinity, pressure, temperature, and rock type, influence these interactions. This review explores the impact of these parameters on the IFT between CO2 and oil/water systems, drawing on findings from both experimental studies and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The literature indicates that increased temperature, reduced pressure, lower salinity, and the presence of asphaltenes tend to reduce IFT at the oil–water interface. Similarly, elevated temperature and pressure, along with asphaltene content, also lower the surface tension between CO2 and oil. Most MD simulations employ synthetic oil mixtures of various alkanes and use tools such as LAMMPS and GROMACS. Experimentally, the pendant drop method is most commonly used with crude oil and brine samples. Future research employing actual reservoir fluids and alternative measurement techniques may yield more accurate and representative IFT data, further advancing the application of CO2-EOR. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 2212 KB  
Review
Review of Biomass Gasifiers: A Multi-Criteria Approach
by Julián Cardona-Giraldo, Laura C. G. Velandia, Daniel Marin, Alejandro Argel, Samira García-Freites, Marco Sanjuan, David Acosta, Adriana Aristizabal, Santiago Builes and Maria L. Botero
Gases 2025, 5(4), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/gases5040022 - 13 Oct 2025
Viewed by 265
Abstract
Gasification of residual biomass has emerged as an efficient thermochemical conversion process, applicable to a wide range of uses, such as electricity generation; chemical manufacturing; and the production of liquid biofuels, BioSNG (biomass-based synthetic natural gas), and hydrogen. Thus, gasification of biomass residues [...] Read more.
Gasification of residual biomass has emerged as an efficient thermochemical conversion process, applicable to a wide range of uses, such as electricity generation; chemical manufacturing; and the production of liquid biofuels, BioSNG (biomass-based synthetic natural gas), and hydrogen. Thus, gasification of biomass residues not only constitutes an important contribution toward decarbonizing the economy but also promotes the efficient utilization of renewable resources. Although a variety of gasification technologies are available, there are no clear guidelines for selecting the type of gasifier appropriate depending on the feedstock and the desired downstream products. Herein, we propose a gasifier classification model based on an extensive literature review, combined with a multi-criteria decision-making approach. A comprehensive and up-to-date literature review was conducted to gain a thorough understanding of the current state of knowledge in biomass gasification. The different features of the different types of gasifiers, in the context of biomass gasification, are presented and compared. The gasifiers were reviewed and evaluated considering criteria such as processing capacity, syngas quality, process performance, feedstock flexibility, operational and capital costs, environmental impact, and specific equipment features. A multi-criteria classification methodology was evaluated for assessing biomass gasifiers. A case study of such methodology was a applied to determine the best gasifiers for BioSNG inclusion in the natural gas distribution system in a small-scale scenario. Validation was conducted by comparing the matrix findings with commercially implemented gasification projects worldwide. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Gas)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop