Next Article in Journal
A Randomised Controlled CBT Intervention for Maladaptive Perfectionism: Outcome and Predictors
Previous Article in Journal
A Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment for Women with Postpartum Depression
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Coping Strategies Used by Young Tunisian Athletes in Individual and Collective Sports

1
Higher Institute of Physical Education and Sports Gafsa, University of Gafsa, Gafsa 2100, Tunisia
2
Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), 16132 Genoa, Italy
3
Department of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), 16132 Genoa, Italy
4
Department of Sociology, Faculty of Arts of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax 3029, Tunisia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Psychiatry Int. 2021, 2(3), 277-286; https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint2030021
Submission received: 2 April 2021 / Revised: 15 June 2021 / Accepted: 17 June 2021 / Published: 1 July 2021

Abstract

:
The objective of this study was to discover the repertoire of coping strategies used by young Tunisian male and female athletes in individual and team sports when competing in their sport, and to examine the effect of gender and type of sport on these strategies. A total of 917 young Tunisian athletes including 349 female athletes and 568 male athletes, aged 14 to 19, with an average age of 15.63 ± 1.5 years, participated in our study. Participants were invited to respond to the Arabic version of the Competitive Sport Adaptation Strategy Inventory to assess their coping repertoire. The results revealed that factors, such as gender, and type of sport, influenced the coping repertoire among young athletes. In the inter-personal and intra-personal context, young athletes used a wide variety of coping strategies, all of which were task-oriented and disengagement-oriented.

1. Introduction

Stress and coping represent a dynamic and reciprocal bipolarity that can be modeled and understood based on the cognitive–motivational–relational (CMRT) theory of emotion [1,2]. This conceptual framework is commonly employed to improve and enhance athletic performance and has been supported by a growing body of scholarly research in the field of sports psychology [3,4].
Stress is a process that occurs as a result of a series of transactions, exchanges and exposures, between the athlete and the surrounding environment [5,6,7]. Over the past two decades, researchers in sports psychology have focused on examining different stressful events [8,9], including the competitive situation. Competitive stress can be defined as an ongoing transaction between an athlete and the environmental demands associated primarily and directly with competitive performance. The ability to cope with competitive stress reactions mainly depends on the athlete [10,11,12]. Some athletes face the problem they encounter directly and act quite rationally, while others disengage and distract from the stressful situation. The coping process is a major component in dealing with competitive transactional stress, defined as an athlete’s ability to cope with their environmental stimuli and personal responses. As previously mentioned, coping is a dynamic mechanism that changes according to the competitive situation and represents a good indicator of performance [3,4].
The ability to cope with competitive stressors can contribute to successful performance outcomes [13,14,15]. In particular, athletes who focus on task-oriented coping strategies often achieve positive performance [16,17,18,19], while athletes who focus on coping strategies geared towards disengagement or distraction generally obtain negative performance [20].
Identifying the sources of stress encountered by athletes and the different influences they exert on the use of a particular coping strategy is a major and currently debated research question. Understanding why and how athletes adopt a given coping strategy is also of paramount importance to optimize athletes’ performance [21]. The wide range of coping strategies used by athletes can be explained by accounting for the different types of stressors, both at the intra- and inter-personal levels [21].
These strategies are generally categorized as problem-centered, emotion-centered, or avoidance coping [22,23,24,25,26]. Another alternative classification lists coping strategies as being task-oriented, oriented on disengagement, or distraction [27,28]. Recently, Nicholls et al. (2016) [26] presented a classification of coping strategies according to the magnitude of their directions: control, internal regulation, and disengagement of the objective.
The regulation of emotions can occur at the level of personal contexts, generally characterized by limited resources, in which individuals control their emotions (the so-called models of self-regulation and self-control) [29]. The regulation of inter-personal emotions in a collective context [30,31] may include efforts to improve well-being and manage stress in a collective way [32].
The majority of studies in sports psychology have focused primarily on the sources of stress experienced by athletes and how they cope individually [33]. However, it is clear that performance in team sports is part of an eminently social context made up of numerous interactions, exchanges, exposures, and other transactions. It, therefore, appears essential to understand how athletes interact within the surrounding environment and to what extent the processes from coping to stress are shared in the context of performance.
The same source of stress can be shared between several individuals of the same group. This so-called common stress [34] can establish collective coping responses [35,36,37,38,39,40], the adoption of which results in the cohesion and commitment of the group in a series of cognitive and behavioral efforts maintaining the social relationships during stressful episodes and events.
Coping strategies will also be affected by the constraints and opportunities offered by cultural thinking, social reflections, type of personality, as well as gender [41,42,43].
Gender is another key factor in studying coping strategies in competitive contexts. This factor plays an important role in recognizing the sources of stress experienced by athletes during sports competitions. Female athletes often use different coping strategies than their male counterparts. Investigations show that men score higher than women on problem-oriented strategies [44]. In another study, women used a variety of problem-oriented strategies.
Some studies have explicitly focused on team sports and have identified specific stressors assessed on an inter-personal basis. Other studies support the idea that stressors commonly identified at the individual level also appear to be determined at the team level. According to these studies, the type of sport has been identified as a factor affecting the perception of stress and influencing the process of adaptation in both intra- and inter-personal contexts.
The objective of this study, which targeted Tunisian athletes engaged in individual and team sports, was (i) to investigate perceived stressors at the intra- and inter-personal level, and (ii) to deepen knowledge on adaptation processes by exploring the influence of factors related to gender and type of sports discipline.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

A total of 917 Tunisian male and female athletes voluntarily participated in our study. They are between 14 and 19 years old (15.63 ± 1.5 years), of which 349 (38.1%) female athletes had an average age of 16.09 years (SD: 1.39) and 568 (61.9%) male athletes had an average age 15.34 years (SD: 1.5). Our participants were competing at the national level, of which, 646 were from team sports and 271 from individual sports. The athletes from team sport included: soccer (n = 376), basketball (n = 59), handball (n = 158), and volleyball (n = 53). For individual sports, our athletes were from: athletics (n = 78), gymnastics (n = 36), Taekwondo (n = 61), boxing (n = 24), karate (n = 24), kickboxing (n = 21), Kyokushinkai (n = 21), and canoe kayak (n = 30). Our participants had an average training of 8 h per week and played in 12 or more competitions during the season.

2.2. Measures

In this study, the measurements were taken by the Arabic version of the Inventory of coping strategies in sports competition (ISCCS; by Hajji et al., in 2016), validated from the original version of Gaudreau and Blondin (2002). The ISCCS (Hajji et al., 2016) includes 39 items and 10 subscales: Mental imagery, Thought control, Effort expenditure, Seeking support, Relaxation, Logical analysis, Venting of unpleasant emotions, Disengagement, Social withdrawal, and Mental distraction. These 10 subscales are grouped under three main scales: task-oriented coping, disengagement, and distraction. The athlete’s response is given on a 5-point Likert type scale ranging from 1 (not at all used) to 5 (used very frequently).

2.3. Procedures

The managers and coaches of the participating teams were informed about the aim of the research project and were requested to participate. The tests took place in the competitive phase of the season, 1 to 2 h after the competition. Our participants and/or their guardians signed a consent form and were free to withdraw their participation at any stage. They were informed about the nature and purpose of the study. Data was considered and handled confidentially and strictly used for research purposes only. The duration of testing was 10 to 15 min.
The study protocol was reviewed in-depth and fully approved by the Ethical Committee of the Institute of Physical Education and Sports Gafsa, Tunisia (protocol number ID IRB00000637-06). This study was conducted in accordance with the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.4. Data Analysis Plan

The various statistical parameters were calculated using the “IBM SPSS Statistics 25” software. Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) were applied to reveal the scores of first- and second-order coping in young athletes in relation to gender, sport type, and sport discipline factors. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was applied to examine the effect of gender on the coping repertoire used by young athletes. The effect size was calculated using Wilks’ lambda distribution to account for the significance of the results and to report only significant interactions. For all statistical analyses, p ≤ 0.05 was adopted as the level of significance.

3. Results

3.1. The Effect of Gender and Type of Sport on Coping Strategies Used by Young Athletes

Analysis of variance confirmed the effect of gender (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.780 < 1; D = 25.507; p < 0.05) and type of sport (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.817 < 1; D = 20.24; p < 0.05), on the coping strategies used by young Tunisian athletes (See Table 1).
For the gender variable, the coping strategies involved were (Table 2):
-
Effort expenditure (F = 5.61; p-value < 0.05),
-
Thought control (F = 94.77; p-value < 0.05),
-
Logical analysis (F = 20.15; p-value < 0.05),
-
Venting of unpleasant emotions (F = 99.54; p-value < 0.05),
-
Disengagement (F = 26.04; p-value < 0.05).
For the type of sport variable, the coping strategies involved were (Table 2):
-
Mental imagery (F = 9.37; p-value < 0.05),
-
Effort expenditure (F = 5.74; p-value < 0.05),
-
Thought control (F = 12.93; p-value < 0.05),
-
Seeking support (F = 11.93; p-value < 0.05),
-
Relaxation (F = 76.50; p-value < 0.05),
-
Logical analysis (F = 6.75; p-value < 0.05),
-
Venting of unpleasant emotions (F = 42.08; p-value < 0.05),
-
Disengagement (F = 36.72; p-value < 0.05),
-
Social withdrawal (F = 8.90; p-value < 0.05),
-
Mental distraction (F = 20.47; p-value < 0.05).

3.2. The Coping Scores among Young Athletes According to the Gender Factor

The highest first-order coping strategy scores in young male athletes were: Logical analysis (4.13 ± 0.78) and Thought control (4.07 ± 0.84).
The highest first-order coping strategy scores in young female athletes were: Venting of unpleasant emotions (4.30 ± 0.81) and Disengagement (4.12 ± 0.9) (Table 3).
In general, young male athletes used task-oriented coping, while young female athletes used disengagement coping more (Table 4).

3.3. Coping Scores among Young Athletes According to the Type of Sport

The highest first-order scores for coping relative to sport type were as follows (Table 5).
-
Young male athletes in team sport: Thought control (4.10 ± 0.75) and Logical analysis (4.10 ± 0.78).
-
Young female athletes in team sport: Venting of unpleasant emotions (4.16 ± 0.80) and Disengagement (3.83 ± 1.06).
-
Young male athletes in individual sport: Mental imagery (4.00 ± 0.83) and Disengagement (4.16 ± 0.73).
-
Young female athletes in individual sport: Venting of unpleasant emotions (4.40 ± 0.61) and Disengagement (4.23 ± 0.73).
In general, young male athletes affiliated with team sports used task-oriented coping, whereas young female athletes in team and individual sports and young male athletes in individual sports used disengagement-oriented coping (see Table 6).

3.4. The First-Order Scores of Coping Used by Young Athletes by Sports Specialty

The highest first-order coping scores according to sports specialty are (Table 7):
-
Soccer: Thought control (3.92 ± 0.78) and Logical analysis (3.96 ± 0.89).
-
Handball: Mental imagery (4.12 ± 0.69) and Disengagement (4.13 ± 0.96).
-
Volleyball: Mental imagery (4.30 ± 0.55) and Logical analysis (4.10 ± 0.7).
-
Basketball: Logical analysis (4.20 ± 0.12) and Disengagement (4.44 ± 0.61).
-
Athletics: Venting of unpleasant emotions (4.10 ± 0.78) and Disengagement (4.10 ± 0.78).
-
Taekwondo: Thought control (4.13 ± 0.95) and Disengagement (4.2 ± 0.67).
-
Karate: Venting of unpleasant emotions (4.30 ± 0.63) and Disengagement (4.35 ± 0.55).
-
Kickboxing: Logical analysis (4.32 ± 0.52) and Disengagement (4.4 ± 0.27).
-
Kyokushinkai: Expenditure effort (4.4 ± 1.03) and Disengagement (4.2 ± 0.80).
-
Gymnastics: Venting of unpleasant emotions (4.33 ± 0.71) and Disengagement (4.6 ± 0.62).
-
Canoe Kayak: Effort expenditure (4.23 ± 0.52) and Venting of unpleasant emotions (4.1 ± 0.66).

4. Discussion

4.1. The Effect of Gender on Coping in Young Athletes in Team and Individual Sports

MANOVA confirmed the effect of gender and type of sport factors on the dispositional coping repertoire used by young Tunisian athletes in individual and team sports. Our study confirmed the difference between the sexes in relative adaptation and in the way that men and women cope with stress. The effect of sex on the dispositional and situational coping repertoire in sport has been explored by several studies, with conflicting findings. Some studies suggest that there are strong differences between the sexes, while other studies have indicated only partial support for gender differences.
The type of sport also influences the coping repertoire among young Tunisian athletes; however, studies that prove this are still scarce, although some studies demonstrate this effect by centralizing collective coping.

4.2. The Level of Coping among Young Athletes According to the Gender Factor

Our study reveals that young male athletes use task-oriented coping, while young female athletes use disengagement-oriented coping more. Distraction-oriented coping was not used significantly. According to Gaudreau et al. 2010 [28], task-oriented coping and disengagement-oriented coping were associated, respectively, with the best and worst levels of subjective and objective achievement.
According to Doron and Martinent (2017) [16], female athletes had higher levels of emotionally focused coping during competition. In some studies, men used problem-oriented coping more than women [45]. Others have found that women used a more problem-oriented adaptation, indicating that the athletes who master the situation were associated with the evaluation of the challenge, which was itself associated with the pleasant emotions. These associations were combined with the task-oriented coping. In addition, avoidance goals were associated with threat ratings, which in turn were associated with unpleasant emotions, these emotions being coupled with disengagement-oriented forms of coping.

4.3. The Level of Coping in Young Athletes According to Type of Sport

Our study indicated that the level of coping differs depending on the individual and team sports discipline. Young male athletes in team sports used task-oriented coping, while young female athletes in team and individual sports and young male athletes in individual sports used disengagement-oriented coping. However, little attention has been paid to the inter-personal or social functions of emotions in sport. Recent research has examined athlete responses to organizational and inter-personal stressors, which could be considered common stressors for teams and groups [46,47].
On the other hand, we have found that coping varies according to the sporting discipline practiced. While differences in the personality characteristics of athletes from different sports disciplines have been identified, little progress has been made in understanding these differences [48,49,50].
Athletes report a wide variety of emotions associated with their participation in sport, which can have positive and negative consequences on team performance and functioning.

5. Limitations

In the inter-personal context, athletes use a wide variety of coping strategies. These can often be influenced by the social environment, even by the coping strategies used by other people who influence this environment, and the links maintained between the variables characterizing group dynamics and emotional process. The failure to test these people’s coping strategies is one of the biggest shortcomings in our current study.

6. Conclusions

A growing body of scholarly research shows the importance of studying coping strategies both at the intra- and inter-personal levels. However, most research generally focuses on the intra-personal nature of coping, while there are exciting developments in areas of inter-personal adaptation, such as community adjustment and inter-personal emotional regulation. In this context, our work is aimed at studying the repertoire of coping strategies at the collective and individual levels. Athletes constantly interact with their environments, and it is, therefore, important to explore emotional phenomena while taking into account the social aspects of the sport context. Emotional expressions were seen as impacting team functioning and performance, communicating and conveying team values, fulfilling functions of affiliation among teammates, and encouraging dealing with stressors as a team. Factors that appeared to influence athletes’ emotions included the identity of the athlete, relationships with teammates, opponents, leaders, coaches, and social norms of expressing emotions and dealing well with the stress of training and competition.
As a result, in the future, we may consider studying how stressors are assessed as a team and how athletes’ joint assessments may be identical or inconsistent with those of their teammates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.H., S.F. and A.E.; methodology, J.H., S.F., N.B., F.A. and A.E.; software, J.H. and F.A.; validation, J.H., A.B., S.F., N.B., F.A. and A.E.; formal analysis, M.G.; investigation, J.H. and A.B.; resources, J.H., A.B. and S.F.; data curation, J.H., A.B., M.G. and A.E.; writing—original draft preparation, J.H., S.F. and N.B.; writing—review and editing, J.H., M.G. and A.E.; visualization, N.B. and F.A.; supervision, A.E.; project administration, S.F.; funding acquisition, J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Gafsa, Tunisia (protocol code 2100 and date of approval 3 June 2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated are available within the present manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend warm thanks to the coaches and the subjects who participated in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lazarus, R.S. Stress and Emotion: A New Synthesis; Springer Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lazarus, R.S. Cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. In Emotions in Sport; Hanin, Y.L., Ed.; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2000; pp. 39–63. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nicholls, A.R.; Polman, R.; Levy, A.R.; Taylor, J.; Cobley, S. Stressors, coping, and coping effectiveness: Gender, type of sport, and skill differences. J. Sports Sci. 2007, 25, 1521–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nicholls, A.R.; Polman, R.C.J. Coping in sport: A systematic review. J. Sports Sci. 2007, 25, 11–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hoar, S.D.; Crocker, P.R.E.; Holt, N.L.; Tamminen, K.A. Gender Differences in Adolescent Athletes’ Coping with Interpersonal Stressors in Sport: More Similarities than Differences? J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2010, 22, 134–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hoar, S.D.; Kowalski, K.C.; Gaudreau, P.; Crocker, P.R.E. A review of coping in sport. In Literature Reviews in Sport Psychology; Hanton, S., Mallalieu, S., Eds.; Nova Science: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 53–103. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fletcher, D.; Hanton, S.; Mellalieu, S.D.; Neil, R. A conceptual framework of organizational stressors in sport performers. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2010, 22, 545–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Arnold, R.; Fletcher, D.; Daniels, K. Organisational stressors, coping, and outcomes in competitive sport. J. Sports Sci. 2016, 35, 694–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Anshel, M.H.; Si, G. Coping styles following acute stress in sport among elite Chinese athletes: A test of trait and transactional coping theories. J. Sport Behav. 2008, 31, 3–21. [Google Scholar]
  10. Anshel, M.H. Cultural differences in coping with stress in sport. In Coping in Sport: Theory, Methods, and Related Constructs; Nicholls, A.R., Ed.; Nova Science: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 119–138. [Google Scholar]
  11. Anshel, M.H.; Kang, M.; Miesner, M. The approach-avoidance framework for identifying athletes’ coping style as a function of gender and race. Scand. J. Psychol. 2009, 51, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Thelwell, R.C.; Weston, N.J.; Greenlees, I.A. Batting on a sticky wicket: Identifying sources of stress and associated coping strategies for professional cricket batsmen. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2007, 8, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Martinent, G.; Ledos, S.; Ferrand, C.; Campo, M.; Nicolas, M. Athletes’ regulation of emotions experienced during competition: A naturalistic video-assisted study. Sport Exerc. Perform. Psychol. 2015, 4, 188–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Martinent, G.; Nicolas, M.; Gaudreau, P.; Campo, M. A cluster analysis of affective states before and during competition. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2013, 35, 600–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nicolas, M.; Gaudreau, P.; Franche, V. Perception of coaching behaviors, coping, and achievement in a sport competition. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2011, 33, 460–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Doron, J.; Martinent, G. Appraisal, coping, emotion, and performance during elite fencing matches: A random coefficient regression model approach. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2016, 27, 1015–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Doron, J.; Bourbousson, J. How stressors are dynamically appraised within a team during a game: An exploratory study in basketball. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2017, 27, 2080–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Doron, J.; Gaudreau, P. A Point-by-Point Analysis of Performance in a Fencing Match: Psychological Processes Associated with Winning and Losing Streaks. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2014, 36, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Doron, J.; Stephan, Y.; Le Scanff, C. Coping strategies: A review of literature in sport and academic contexts. Eur. Rev. Appl. Psychol. 2013, 63, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Laborde, S.; You, M.; Dosseville, F.; Salinas, A. Culture, individual differences, and situation: Influence on coping in French and Chinese table tennis players. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2012, 12, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Crocker, P.R.E.; Tamminen, K.A.; Gaudreau, P. Coping in sport. In Contemporary Advances in Sport Psychology: A Review; Mellalieu, S.D., Hanton, S., Eds.; Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK, 2015; pp. 28–67. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nicholls, A.R.; Perry, J.L. Perceptions of Coach–Athlete Relationship Are More Important to Coaches than Athletes in Predicting Dyadic Coping and Stress Appraisals: An Actor–Partner Independence Mediation Model. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Nicholls, A.R.; Jones, C.R.; Polman, R.C.J.; Borkoles, E. Acute sport-related stressors, coping, and emotion among professional rugby union players during training and matches. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2008, 19, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nicholls, A.R.; Perry, J.L.; Calmeiro, L. Precompetitive Achievement Goals, Stress Appraisals, Emotions, and Coping among Athletes. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2014, 36, 433–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nicholls, A.R.; Polman, R.C.; Levy, A. A path analysis of stress appraisals, emotions, coping, and performance satisfaction among athletes. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2012, 13, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nicholls, A.R.; Taylor, N.J.; Carroll, S.; Perry, J.L. The Development of a New Sport-Specific Classification of Coping and a Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Different Coping Strategies and Moderators on Sporting Outcomes. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gaudreau, P.; Blondin, J.-P. Development of a questionnaire for the assessment of coping strategies employed by athletes in competitive sport settings. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2002, 3, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gaudreau, P.; Nicholls, A.; Levy, A.R. The ups and downs of coping and sport achievement: An episodic process analysis of within-person associations. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2010, 32, 298–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Baumeister, R.F.; Vohs, K.D.; Tice, D.M. The Strength Model of Self-Control. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 16, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Niven, K.; Totterdell, P.; Holman, D. A classification of controlled interpersonal affect regulation strategies. Emotion 2009, 9, 498–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zaki, J.; Williams, W.C. Interpersonal emotion regulation. Emotion 2013, 13, 803–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Bodenmann, G.; Meuwly, N.; Kayser, K. Two Conceptualizations of Dyadic Coping and Their Potential for Predicting Relationship Quality and Individual Well-Being: A comparaison. Eur. Psychol. 2011, 16, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. McArdle, S.; Moore, P. Applying Evidence-Based Principles from CBT to Sport Psychology. Sport Psychol. 2012, 26, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Neely, K.C.; McHugh, T.-L.F.; Dunn, J.G.; Holt, N.L. Athletes and parents coping with deselection in competitive youth sport: A communal coping perspective. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2017, 30, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tamminen, K.; Holt, N.L. Adolescent athletes’ learning about coping and the roles of parents and coaches. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2012, 13, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tamminen, K.A.; Gaudreau, P. Coping, social support, and emotion regulation in teams. In Group Dynamics in Exercise and Sport Psychology: Contemporary Themes, 2nd ed.; Beauchamp, M., Eys, M., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 222–239. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tamminen, K.A.; Crocker, P.R.E.; McEwen, C.E. Emotional experiences and coping in sport: How to promote positive adaptational outcomes in sport. In Psychology of Emotions, Motivations and Actions. Positive Human Functioning from a Multidimensional Perspective, Vol. 1. Promoting Stress Adaptation; Gomes, A.R., Resende, R., Albuquerque, A., Eds.; Nova Science Publishers: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 143–162. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tamminen, K.A.; Crocker, P.R.E.; McEwen, C.E. Emotional experiences and coping in sport: How to promote positive adaptational outcomes in sport. In Positive Human Functioning from a Multidimensional Perspective; Gomes, A.R., Resende, R., Albuquerque, A., Eds.; Sage Science: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 143–162. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tamminen, K.A.; McEwen, C.E.; Crocker, P.R.E. Perceived parental support, pressure, and the socialization of adolescent athletes’coping. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 2016, 47, 335–354. [Google Scholar]
  40. Tamminen, K.A.; Palmateer, T.M.; Denton, M.; Sabiston, C.; Crocker, P.R.; Eys, M.; Smith, B. Exploring emotions as social phenomena among Canadian varsity athletes. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2016, 27, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kaiseler, M.; Polman, R.C.J. Gender and coping in sport: Do males and female athletes cope differently? In Coping in Sport: Theory, Methods, and Related Constructs; Nicholls, A.R., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 79–93. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kaiseler, M.; Polman, R.C.; Nicholls, A.R. Gender differences in Appraisal and Coping: An examination of the situational and dispositional hypothesis. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 2012, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Polman, R.C.J.; Clough, P.J.; Levy, A.R. Personality and coping in sport: The big five and mental toughness. In Coping in Sport: Theory, Methods, and Related Constructs; Nicholls, A.R., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 139–158. [Google Scholar]
  44. El Ali, M.; Marivain, T.; Heas, S.; Boulvais, A.-H. Analysis of coping strategies used by players of tennis men and women toward a severe athletic injury. Ann. Médicopsychologiques Rev. Psychiatr. 2008, 166, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hammermeister, J.; Burton, D. Gender Differences in Coping with Endurance Sport Stress: Are Men from Mars and Women from Venus? J. Sport Behav. 2004, 27, 148. [Google Scholar]
  46. Leprince, C.; D’Arripe-Longueville, F.; Doron, J. Coping in Teams: Exploring Athletes’ Communal Coping Strategies to Deal with Shared Stressors. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Campo, M.; Mackie, D.M.; Sanchez, X. Emotions in Group Sports: A Narrative Review From a Social Identity Perspective. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Allen, M.S.; Greenlees, I.; Jones, M. An investigation of the five-factor model of personality and coping behaviour in sport. J. Sports Sci. 2011, 29, 841–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hajji, J.; Baaziz, M.; Mnedla, S.; Ben Jannet, Z.; Elloumi, A. Validation of the Arabic Version of the Inventory of Coping Strategies of Competitive Sport (ISCCS). Adv. Phys. Educ. 2016, 6, 312–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Holt, N.L.; Knight, C.J. Parenting in Youth Sport: From Research to Practice; Routledge: Oxford, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. The effect of the interaction between gender and type of sport factors on the coping strategies used by young Tunisian athletes.
Table 1. The effect of the interaction between gender and type of sport factors on the coping strategies used by young Tunisian athletes.
EffectValueDDegrees of Freedom of the HypothesisDegrees of Freedom Errorp-Value
GenderTrace of Pillai0.22025.507 b10.000904.0000.000
Wilks’ lambda0.78025.507 b10.000904.0000.000
Hotelling trace0.28225.507 b10.000904.0000.000
Roy’s biggest root0.28225.507 b10.000904.0000.000
Type of sportTrace of Pillai0.18320.240 b10.000904.0000.000
Wilks’ lambda0.81720.240 b10.000904.0000.000
Hotelling trace0.22420.240 b10.000904.0000.000
Roy’s biggest root0.22420.240 b10.000904.0000.000
b. Exact statistic.
Table 2. Inter-subject interaction effects between gender and type of sport factors and the coping strategies used by young Tunisian athletes.
Table 2. Inter-subject interaction effects between gender and type of sport factors and the coping strategies used by young Tunisian athletes.
SourceDependent VariableSum of Type III SquaresDegrees of FreedomMean of SquaresFp-Value
GenderMental imagery0.04410.0440.0720.789
Effort expenditure5.61015.6104.6070.032
Thought control94.772194.77295.0280.000
Seeking support1.10911.1091.3010.254
Relaxation0.85410.8541.2250.269
Logical analysis20.150120.15030.7130.000
Venting of unpleasant emotions99.539199.539118.6600.000
Disengagement26.037126.03725.9750.000
Social withdrawal0.01410.0140.0150.904
Mental distraction1.12411.1241.0020.317
Type of sportMental imagery3.85013.8506.3670.012
Effort expenditure6.99116.9915.7410.017
Thought control12.259112.25912.2930.000
Seeking support10.161110.16111.9260.001
Relaxation53.341153.34176.4960.000
Logical analysis4.43014.4306.7520.010
Venting of unpleasant emotions35.300135.30042.0810.000
Disengagement36.813136.81336.7250.000
Social withdrawal8.42518.4258.8980.003
Mental distraction22.964122.96420.4660.000
Table 3. First-order coping scores relative to gender.
Table 3. First-order coping scores relative to gender.
GenderMental ImageryEffort ExpenditureThought ControlSeeking SupportRelaxationLogical AnalysisVenting of Unpleasant EmotionsDisengagementSocial WithdrawalMental Distraction
Male
(N = 568)
Mean3.903.334.073.543.484.133.433.632.832.57
SD0.781.130.840.92.870.781.031.120.971.10
Female
(N = 349)
Mean3.893.693.363.443.453.704.304.122.752.44
SD0.771.141.230.940.860.890.810.900.981.02
Table 4. Second-order coping scores relative to gender.
Table 4. Second-order coping scores relative to gender.
GenderTask-Oriented CopingDisengagement-Oriented CopingDistraction-Oriented Coping
Male
(N = 568)
Mean3.743.532.70
SD0.470.970.82
Female
(N = 349)
Mean3.594.202.59
SD0.500.620.78
Table 5. First-order coping scores compared to the type of sport.
Table 5. First-order coping scores compared to the type of sport.
Type of SportMental ImageryEffort ExpenditureThought ControlSeeking SupportRelaxationLogical AnalysisVenting of Unpleasant EmotionsDisengagementSocial WithdrawalMental Distraction
Male team sport
(N = 382)
Mean3.873.154.103.513.374.103.243.552.912.51
SD0.751.070.750.860.820.781.131.190.951.14
Female team sport
(N = 264)
Mean3.813.703.553.313.223.974.163.832.492.28
SD0.771.161.200.950.840.740.801.060.850.93
Men’s individual sport
(N = 186)
Mean4.003.773.913.713.773.873.934.162.892.79
SD0.831.11.060.950.870.990.810.731.011.06
Women’s individual sport (N = 85)Mean4.013.513.143.623.963.754.404.233.012.75
SD0.791.111.320.990.741.010.610.731.161.03
Table 6. Second-order coping scores compared to the type of sport.
Table 6. Second-order coping scores compared to the type of sport.
Type of SportTask-Oriented CopingDisengagement-Oriented CopingDistraction-Oriented Coping
Male team sport (N = 382)Mean3.673.402.71
SD0.451.040.84
Female team sport(N = 264)Mean3.604.002.39
SD0.430.760.66
Men’s individual sport (N = 186)Mean3.844.052.84
SD0.580.630.80
Women’s individual sport (N = 85)Mean3.674.322.89
SD0.530.470.81
Table 7. First-order coping scores according to sports specialty.
Table 7. First-order coping scores according to sports specialty.
SportMental ImageryEffort ExpenditureThought ControlSeeking SupportRelaxationLogical AnalysisVenting of Unpleasant EmotionsDisengagementSocial WithdrawalMental Distraction
Soccer
(N = 376)
Mean3.643.113.923.233.303.963.333.292.932.73
SD0.791.090.780.890.800.891.211.141.03114
Handball
(N = 158)
Mean4.123.773.773.633.284.114.054.132.541.93
SD0.691.081310.880.920.590.840.960.830.77
Volleyball
(N = 53)
Mean4.303.843.873.533.474.103.884.062.381.79
SD0.551.261.140.820.970.700.851.0790.560.77
Basketball
(N = 59)
Mean4.083.643.694.023.324.204.014.442.422.26
SD0.121.041.050.740.650.120.550.610.430.54
Athletics
(N = 78)
Mean4.043.623.583.753.853.854.104.102.772.89
SD0.921.271.310.870.830.900.780.781.061.01
Taekwondo
(N = 61)
Mean3.943.064.133.713.834.023.934.22.812.50
SD0.841.080.950.950.920.970.850.670.941.02
Karate
(N = 24)
Mean4.203.533.313.513.563.504.304.352.852.31
SD0.430.831.391.070.760.510.630.550.940.58
Kickboxing
(N = 21)
Mean3.934.054.003.684.144.324.084.43.282.85
SD0.380.940.610.610.430.520.720.270.660.68
Kyokushinkai
(N = 21)
Mean4.004.403.973.454.014.053.834.203.292.60
SD1.011.031.311.220.761.151.020.801.011.22
Gymnastics
(N = 36)
Mean4.213.942.943.483.713.334.334.602.962.71
SD0.750.891.261.220.891.210.710.621.581.29
Canoe Kayak
(N = 30)
Mean3.624.233.623.973.803.804.103.723.123.55
SD0.800.480.900.750.891.190.660.810.740.87
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hajji, J.; Bettayeb, A.; Fekih, S.; Guerchi, M.; Bragazzi, N.; Azaiez, F.; Elloumi, A. The Coping Strategies Used by Young Tunisian Athletes in Individual and Collective Sports. Psychiatry Int. 2021, 2, 277-286. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint2030021

AMA Style

Hajji J, Bettayeb A, Fekih S, Guerchi M, Bragazzi N, Azaiez F, Elloumi A. The Coping Strategies Used by Young Tunisian Athletes in Individual and Collective Sports. Psychiatry International. 2021; 2(3):277-286. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint2030021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hajji, Jamel, Anouer Bettayeb, Sofien Fekih, Maher Guerchi, Nicola Bragazzi, Fairouz Azaiez, and Ali Elloumi. 2021. "The Coping Strategies Used by Young Tunisian Athletes in Individual and Collective Sports" Psychiatry International 2, no. 3: 277-286. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint2030021

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop