Next Article in Journal
Seasonal Forecast Climate Data and Hydropower Production in the Douro Basin, in Portugal
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Acoustic Survey Method for Leakage Detection and Reduction in Water Distribution Network of Thessaloniki City, Greece
 
 
Please note that, as of 4 December 2024, Environmental Sciences Proceedings has been renamed to Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings and is now published here.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Artificial Neural Network for Daily Low Stream Flow Rate Prediction of Iokastis Stream, Kavala City, NE Greece, NE Mediterranean Basin †

by
Thomas Papalaskaris
Department of Civil Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Kimmeria Campus, 67100 Xanthi, Greece
Presented at the 4th EWaS International Conference: Valuing the Water, Carbon, Ecological Footprints of Human Activities, Online, 24–27 June 2020.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2020, 2(1), 70; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2020002070
Published: 22 September 2020

Abstract

:
Only a few scientific research studies referencing extremely low flow conditions have been conducted in Greece so far. Forecasting future low stream flow rate values is a crucial and decisive task when conducting drought and watershed management plans by designing construction plans dealing with water reservoirs and general hydraulic works capacity, by calculating hydrological and drought low flow indices, and by separating groundwater base flow and storm flow of storm hydrographs, etc. The Artificial Neural Network modeling simulation method generates artificial time series of simulated values of a random (hydrological in this specific case) variable. The present study produces artificial low stream flow time series of part of 2015. We compiled an Artificial Neural Network to simulate low stream flow rate data, acquired at a certain location of the entirely regulated, urban stream, which crosses the roads junction formed by Iokastis road and an Chrisostomou Smirnis road, Agios Loukas residential area, Kavala city, Eastern Macedonia & Thrace Prefecture, NE Greece, during part of July, August, and part of September 2015, until 12 September 2015, using a 3-inches conventional portable Parshall flume. The observed data were plotted against the predicted one and the results were demonstrated through interactive tables by providing us the ability to effectively evaluate the ANN model simulation procedure performance. Finally, we plotted the recorded against the simulated low stream flow rate data by compiling a log-log scale chart, which provides a better visualization of the discrepancy ratio statistical performance metrics and calculated further statistic values featuring the comparison between the recorded and the forecasted low stream flow rate data.

1. Introduction

Low flow regimes in rivers and streams are of paramount importance to the ecological conditions of any land surface hydrological feature. Any shift in the flows pattern throughout any hydrological year, stemming, for instance, from either individual activities, e.g., groundwater abstraction, precipitation shortage, riparian areas encroachment, stream channelizing due to urbanization etc., or a combination of them, may contribute to stream ecology changes that cannot be undone [1]. Low flow analysis and forecasting is also fundamental when building works along watercourses (e.g., dams, reservoirs, water deviation channels for irrigation purposes, etc.) and for watercourse rehabilitation plans regarding which a knowledge of hydrological fluctuation is of fundamental importance in designing sustainable rehabilitation works.
Another type of low flow analysis, specifically probability distribution analysis, was performed in the past analyzing the observed data collected at the same gauging station between 25 July 2015 and 11 September 2015, which revealed that Dagum (4P) demonstrated the highest final goodness of fit obtained score based, simultaneously, on all available (Anderson-Darling, Chi-Squared, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov) goodness of fit criteria [2].
Another type of low flow analysis, specifically probability distribution analysis, was performed in the past by analyzing the observed data collected at another, with similar features, gauging station, located at the outlet of Perigiali Stream, Kavala City, NE Greece, NE Mediterranean Basin, between 14 May 2016 and 31 July 2016, which reveals that Pearson type 6 (3P) demonstrated the highest final goodness-of-fit obtained score based, simultaneously, on all available (Anderson-Darling, Chi-Squared, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov) goodness-of-fit criteria [3]. Furthermore, as far as the same gauging station, (Perigiali Stream watershed outlet), a similar type of analysis was elaborated considering, this time, the observed data collected at the same gauging station between 14 May 2016 and 29 August 2016, revealing that Wakeby type (5P) demonstrated the highest final goodness-of-fit obtained score based on the Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit criterion and employed to generate an artificial low flow time series for the same time interval [4,5]. The Monte-Carlo simulation method, as another type of low flow analysis, was employed to define, by generating multiple attempts, the anticipated value of a random (hydrological in the specific case) variable to the above mentioned gauging station, located at the outlet of Perigiali Stream, Kavala City, NE Greece, NE Mediterranean Basin, between 14 May 2016 and 31 July 2016 [6].
Especially within the last decade, a great number of ANN models have been designed for stream flow and sediment transport rates simulation. In a scientific research article, an ANN model was employed to design a model for streamflow forecasting by respecting the San Juan River basin, Argentina, using meteorological data from Pachon meteorological station built at 1900 m of altitude and proved distinctively effective for fitting the observed stream flow data remarkably well [7]. In a scientific research article, an ANN model was developed and proved effective for simulating the daily high and low flows, in Mesochora catchment, (drained by the Acheloos River), central mountain region of Greece [8]. In another scientific research article, the performance of three different ANN schemes (a, b, and c) was tested in order to calculate bed load transport rate in gravel-bed rivers running within the Snake River Basin, U.S.A. [9]. In another scientific research article, an ANN model was developed and proved capable of stream flow modeling of Savitri catchment, India [10]. In another scientific research article, an ANN model was designed and performed adequately of stream flow modeling of Nestos River, NE Greece [11]. In another scientific research article, an ANN model, (M13.10.1), was found to best fit and model the low stream flow data recorded at the outlet of Perigiali Stream, Kavala city, NE Greece, NE Mediterranean Basin [12].
In the present scientific research study, ANNs have been employed to design a forecasting model for the daily low flows of Iokastis Stream (at an intermediate point of the stream channel, within the urban area, of the homonymous watershed), Kavala city, Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Prefecture, NE Greece, NE Mediterranean Basin. Their selection is founded on the fact that they perform remarkably well (together within other sectors of scientific interests) in the field of hydrology. However, in some occasions, there are no available adequate information respecting all the variables contributing to the watershed system driving forces.

2. Study Area

The stream flow rate gauging station, which was established near the junction formed by Iokastis and Chrisostomou Smirnis roads, Agios Loukas residential sector, Kavala city, (NE Greece, NE Mediterranean Basin), a coastal city, located at the north of the Aegean Sea, across the Thassos Island, refers to an intermediate point of an absolutely channelized stream with bed, walls, and most of his top length is made from steel reinforced concrete. Thus, the major part of the stream’s length and, consequently, its associated flow are invisible. It is surrounded by the Lekani mountain series branches to the North and East and the Paggaion Mountain ramifications to the West, (established in the proximity of the city urban web center and at the north exit of the city as well). More precisely, it is located at the specific co-ordinates 40°55′57.70″ N and 24°23′19.74″ E, Kavala city area, and operated continuously, which spans a time period from 25 July 2015 to 11 September 2015, as illustrated in Figure 1.

3. Materials and Methods

We considered the stream flow data observed during a continuous period of 2015, more precisely, during part of July (from 25 July 2015), August 2015, and part of September 2015 (until 11 September 2015, when unfortunately, a sudden storm associated with heavy rainfall, caused a flash flood, which destroyed the apparatus).
The distinctively shallow waters, exacerbated by the extremely low water stream flow velocity occurring at the gauging station, make it impossible to perform the area-velocity method in order to calculate the stream flow rate (discharge) by using a current meter mounted on a wading rod due to the fact that there is no adequate depth to submerge the current meter. Moreover, the pronounced low water stream flow velocity is not sufficient enough to trigger the operation of a current meter. Under those noticeable circumstances, the only other remaining options are the use of either a small-sized portable weir (its implementation brings difficulties due to the fact that weirs, in general, demand a relatively great head loss, which is not available at areas in proximity to watersheds’ outlets, where, in most cases, the natural slope of the channel bed is extremely low if not zero) plate or a small-sized flume, which, eventually, was our final selected option. More specifically, “3-inch U.S.G.S. Conventional Portable Parshall Flume” [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24], made of pre-fabricated plastics, covered with a sprayed thin smooth polyester coating, which is identical to the industry covers the outside surface of high-speed sea boats, in order to reduce the friction developing between the outside area of those sea boats and the sea water, which secures that the friction developed between the bottom as well as the walls of the stream flow rate gauging apparatus is minimized/restricted to a minimum.
Meteorological data has been collected from Dexameni–Kavala city–Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Prefecture–NE Greece–NE Mediterranean Basin private meteorological station (located at 40°56′25″ N–E24°24′01″ E, Altitude: 90 m).
Low stream flow rate values were forecasted by employing MLFP that is an appropriate type of ANNs both for meteorological as well as for river stream flow rate predictions.

4. Results and Discussion

Employing MATLAB software, various different designs of MLFP were elaborated on with a different number of neurons within both the input as well as the hidden layers. The superb model for daily forecasting (in the present study, M17.10.1) is described within the first following subsection while the referenced statistical criteria are displayed within the second one. The three important identification characteristics of the model are as following: the number of neurons in input (i), hidden (j), and output (k) layers, respectively.

4.1. Structure of Artificial Neural Network (M17.10.1)

A custom neural network (abbreviated as M17.10.1) was employed in order to simulate all the 49 site-measured values of the observed stream flow rate, as depicted within Table A1, with the following architecture: Network Type: Feed-forward back propagation, Training Function: TRAINGDX, Adaption Learning Function: LEARNGDM, Performance Function: MSE, Number of Layers: 2, Number of Neurons: 10, and Transfer Function: LOGSIG. It should also be stressed that epochs were selected equal to 1000. The input data for 49 site measurements were arranged as a time series with a length of 49 data. The selected custom neural network’s architecture used for this simulation is depicted within Figure 2.
The input layer for this network consists of 17 neurons representing (for the same period ranging from 25 July 2015 to 11 September 2015) as following: total daily rainfall R, cumulative total daily rainfall RC, mean daily wind velocity UWave, maximum daily wind velocity UWmax, mean daily wind gusts velocity UWgave, maximum daily wind gusts velocity UWgmax, mean daily air temperature Tave, minimum daily air temperature Tmin, maximum daily air temperature Tmax, mean daily air humidity Have, minimum daily air humidity Hmin, maximum daily humidity Hmax, mean daily air pressure Pave, minimum daily air pressure Pmin, maximum daily air pressure Pmax, mean daily discomfort index Tdi, and mean daily dew point temperature Tdp. For this network, 10 neurons were selected for the hidden layer.
The validation performance of the ANN (M17.10.1) is illustrated within Figure 3.
The training regression performance of the ANN (M17.10.1) is illustrated within Figure 4.

4.2. Model Statistical Efficiency Criteria and Performance Metrics

The respective statistical criteria values concerning the Iokastis Stream regarding the selected artificial neural network (M17.10.1) are depicted in Table 1 [25]. The relative error value depicted in Table 1 represents the average value of the relative errors calculated for each pair of calculated and site measured low stream flow rate values.
The plot depicted in Figure 5 represents the discrepancy ratio concerning Iokastis Stream with reference to the selected artificial neural network, depicting graphically, as far as the present study is concerned, the percentage of the computed low stream flow rate values lying between the double and half of the corresponding recorded values. At this point, it should be noted that both coordinate axes are in a logarithmic scale. Therefore, the equations y = x, y = 0.5x, and y = 2.0x are represented graphically by parallel straight lines [26].
In general, the obtained values of the statistical criteria RMSE, RE, and EC for Iokastis Stream can be considered fairly satisfactory. Additionally, the degree of linear dependence between computed and observed low daily stream flow rate is very high.
The dates of all measurements as well as both the site measured as well as the calculated stream flow rates of Perigiali Stream are presented in Table A1 (on demand).

5. Discussion–Conclusions–Further Research

Lots of models based on the ANN procedure concept have been employed and proposed by researchers so far in order to model daily stream flow and sediment transport rate worldwide. In the present study, a custom neural network (abbreviated as M17.10.1) was employed in order to simulate all the 49 site-measured values of the observed low stream flow rate (as depicted within Table A1) with the certain architecture, using several meteorological parameters (exogenous variables of the runoff generating processes) as inputs, which prevails around the study area. This turned out, among others, to be the most appropriate way to simulate the recorded daily, low stream, flow rate data. The resulted statistical efficiency criteria proved a strong relationship between those meteorological parameters involved and the daily stream flow rate of Iokastis Stream, Kavala city, Greece, which suggests that the ANN modeling concept is able to efficiently simulate an observed daily low stream flow rate data, which is essential for water resources management at a watershed level in terms of drought forecasting and management, water reservoir and water deviation works design, agricultural schemes planning at a regional level, filling gaps within low stream flow rate time series, low-flow indices calculation for environmental purposes, model implementation in uncaged catchments in order to generate artificial low stream flow rate data, etc. Furthermore, the fact that the observed data represents short time intervals instead of an adequately long continuous time series can be considered as a limitation underlining the need of more collected low stream flow rate recorded data in order to prove that our model can be regarded as an undoubtedly reliable one. In the future, provided that a proper and adequate apparatus is available, we intend to monitor water quality parameters in order to perform statistical analysis and assessment [27,28] and apply stochastic models [29] to predict future respecting values, which are essential toward establishing a holistic Iokastis-Chrisostomou Smirnis Stream watershed management scheme.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

The dates of all measurements as well as both the site measured/recorded/observed as well as the calculated/forecasted/predicted/fitted stream flow rates of Perigiali Stream are presented in Table A1.
Table A1. Stream flow rate measurements of Iokastis (& Chrisostomou Smirnis Roads Junction) Stream.
Table A1. Stream flow rate measurements of Iokastis (& Chrisostomou Smirnis Roads Junction) Stream.
No.Date (dd-mm-yy)Stream Flow Rate (m3/s) Site-MeasuredStream Flow Rate (m3/s) Calculated (M17.10.1)
125-7-20150.58660.7177
226-7-20151.93701.8998
327-7-20151.12121.2052
428-7-20151.35741.3375
529-7-20151.62401.5830
630-7-20151.40661.4877
731-7-20151.75901.6366
81-8-20151.57301.5886
92-8-20151.70801.7965
103-8-20151.48901.4525
114-8-20151.66301.5945
125-8-20151.53501.5888
136-8-20151.71201.7173
147-8-20151.75101.7188
158-8-20151.85601.8871
169-8-20151.67701.6599
1710-8-20151.59201.5971
1811-8-20151.60401.5192
1912-8-20151.72601.6711
2013-8-20151.63301.7382
2114-8-20151.88201.6746
2215-8-20151.49201.5594
2316-8-20151.30891.2469
2417-8-20151.76751.7699
2518-8-20151.21381.2538
2619-8-20151.16711.3057
2720-8-20151.16711.1211
2821-8-20151.91701.8529
2922-8-20151.69001.6653
3023-8-20151.12121.1578
3124-8-20151.71421.6205
3225-8-20151.98651.8693
3326-8-20151.60931.6805
3427-8-20151.87591.8828
3528-8-20151.82141.8834
3629-8-20151.60931.6447
3730-8-20151.60931.5918
3831-8-20152.04261.9753
391-9-20151.93091.8669
402-9-20151.71421.6733
413-9-20151.63301.5862
424-9-20151.74401.7883
435-9-20151.89501.9231
446-9-20151.66201.7276
457-9-20151.35741.3640
468-9-20151.45631.6231
479-9-20151.35741.3377
4810-9-20151.45631.4850
4911-9-20151.40661.3784

References

  1. Gustard, A.; Demuth, S. Estimating, Predicting and Forecasting Low Flows. In Manual on Low-Flow Estimation and Prediction (Operational Hydrology Report No. 50), 1st ed.; Gustard, A., Demuth, S., Eds.; World Meteorological Organization (WMO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2008; Volume 1029, pp. 16–21. [Google Scholar]
  2. Papalaskaris, T.; Panagiotidis, T. Stochastic generation of low stream flow data of Iokastis Stream, Kavala city, NE Greece. Proceedings 2018, 2, 579. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/2/11/579 (accessed on 3 March 2020).
  3. Papalaskaris, T.; Panagiotidis, T. Artificial low stream flow time series generation of perigiali stream, Kavala city, NE Greece. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Environmental & Material Flow Management (6th E.M.F.M.), Bor, Serbia, 2–4 October 2016; Živković, Ž., Mihajlović, I., Dordević, P., Eds.; University of Belgrade, Technical Faculty in Bor: Bor, Serbia, 2016; pp. 20–38. [Google Scholar]
  4. Papalaskaris, T.; Panagiotidis, T. Stochastic generation of low stream flow data of Perigiali Stream, Kavala city, NE Greece. In Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of European Water Resources Association (“E.W.R.A.”) on Water Resources and Environment “Panta Rhei” 2017 (10th “E.W.R.A.” “Panta Rhei” 2017), Athens, Greece, 5–9 July 2017; Tsakiris, G., Tsihrintzis, V., Vangelis, H., Tigkas, D., Eds.; European Water Resources Association (E.W.R.A.): Athens, Greece, 2017; pp. 953–960. [Google Scholar]
  5. Papalaskaris, T.; Panagiotidis, T. Stochastic generation of low stream flow data of Perigiali Stream, Kavala city, NE Greece. European Water 2017, 60, 299–306. Available online: http://ewra.net/ew/pdf/EW_2017_60_41.pdf (accessed on 3 March 2018).
  6. Papalaskaris, T.; Panagiotidis, T. Forecasting Low Stream Flow Rrate Using Monte-Carlo Simulation of Perigiali Stream, Kavala city, NE Greece. Proceedings 2018, 2, 580. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/2/11/580#cite (accessed on 3 March 2020).
  7. Dolling, O.; Varas, E. Artificial neural networks for streamflow prediction. J. Hydraul. Res. 2002, 40, 547–554. Available online: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/27dd/9e8b1c8fa2ca686b981587767cbe0bc2adda.pdf (accessed on 3 March 2018). [CrossRef]
  8. Panagoulia, D. Artificial neural networks and high and low flows in various climate regimes. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2006, 51, 563–587. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1623/hysj.51.4.563 (accessed on 3 March 2018). [CrossRef]
  9. Kitsikoudis, V.; Sidiropoulos, E.; Hrissanthou, V. Machine Learning Utilization for Bed Load Transport in Gravel-Bed Rivers. Water Resour. Manag. 2014, 28, 3727–3743. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11269-014-0706-z (accessed on 3 March 2018). [CrossRef]
  10. Kothari, M.; Gharde, K.D. Application of ANN and fuzzy logic algorithms for stream flow modeling of Savitri catchment. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 2015, 124, 933–943. Available online: http://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/jess/124/05/0933-0943 (accessed on 3 March 2018). [CrossRef]
  11. Papalaskaris, T.; Dimitriadou, P. Artificial Neural Network for Bed Load Transport Rate in Nestos River, Greece. Spec. Top. Rev. Porous Media Int. J. 2017, 8, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Papalaskaris, T.; Panagiotidis, T. Artificial Neural Network for Daily Low Stream Flow Rate Prediction of Perigiali Stream, Kavala city, NE Greece. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Efficient & Sustainable Water Systems Management towards Worth Living Development/Insights on the Water-Energy-Food-Nexus (3rd E.W.a.S. 2018), Lefkada, Greece, 27–30 June 2018; Kanakoudis, V., Keramaris, E., Eds.; University of Thessaly: Volos, Greece, 2018; pp. 59–66. [Google Scholar]
  13. Johnson, A. Modified Parshall Flume (U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report), 1st ed.; United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey: Denver, CO, USA, 1963; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  14. Papalaskaris, T.; Panagiotidis, T. Artificial Neural Network for Daily Low Stream Flow Rate Prediction of Perigiali Stream, Kavala city, NE Greece. Proceedings 2018, 2, 578. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/2/11/578 (accessed on 3 March 2020).
  15. Rantz, S.E.; Buchanan, T.J.; Kilpatrick, F.A.; Cobb, E.D.; Benson, M.A.; Dalrymple, T.; Kindsvater, C.E.; Tracy, H.J.; Wilson, J.F. Measurement of Discharge by Miscellaneous Methods. In Measurement and Computation of Streamflow: Volume 1. Measurement of Stage and Discharge, 1st ed.; United States Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1982; Volume 1, pp. 260–272. [Google Scholar]
  16. Modified Parshall Flume–(U.S.G.S.). 2018. Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/modified-parshall-flume (accessed on 3 March 2018).
  17. U.S.G.S. Portable Parshall Flume (Open-Channel-Flow Hydrological Equipment). 2018. Available online: https://www.openchannelflow.com/blog/usgs-portable-parshall-flume (accessed on 3 March 2018).
  18. U.S.G.S. Portable Parshall Flume, 3in (Rickly Hydrological Equipment). 2018. Available online: http://rickly.com/usgs-portable-parshall-flume-3in/ (accessed on 3 March 2018).
  19. Measuring Low Flow in San Pedro River. 2018. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLWtfMYicrI (accessed on 3 March 2018).
  20. Inspecting a Parshall Flume (3-Inch USGS Modified Portable). 2018. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtqflgfOb5E (accessed on 3 March 2018).
  21. Inspecting a Parshall Flume. 2018. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6hiOLgTo6g (accessed on 3 March 2018).
  22. Inspecting a Parshall Flume (a+b). 2018. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgV5AKAYBe4 (accessed on 3 March 2018).
  23. MSc. In Management of Water Resources in the Mediterranean 3. 2018. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=picUMHITkx0 (accessed on 3 March 2018).
  24. Father of the Flume: Ralph Parshall. 2018. Available online: https://lib2.colostate.edu/archives/water/parshall/ (accessed on 3 March 2018).
  25. Krause, P.; Boyle, D.P.; Bäse, F. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv. Geosci. 2005, 5, 89–97. Available online: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00296842/document (accessed on 3 March 2018). [CrossRef]
  26. Papalaskaris, T.; Dimitriadou, P.; Hrissanthou, V. Comparison between computations and measurements of bed load transport rate in Nestos River, Greece. Procedia Eng. 2016, 162, 172–180. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705816333392 (accessed on 3 March 2018). [CrossRef]
  27. Sentas, A.; Psilovikos, A.; Psilovikos, T. Statistical Analysis and Assessment of Water Quality Parameters in Pagoneri, River Nestos. Eur. Water 2016, 55, 115–124. Available online: http://www.ewra.net/ew/pdf/EW_2016_55_10.pdf (accessed on 10 May 2018).
  28. Sentas, A.; Psilovikos, A. Monitoring Parameters Tw, DO and environmental evaluation of the artificial lake of thesaurus for the years 2004–2007. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference HydroMedit 2014, Volos, Greece, 13–15 November 2014; University of Thessaly, Department of Ichthyology & Aquatic Environment: Volos, Greece, 2014; pp. 19–23. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sentas, A.; Psilovikos, A.; Matzafleri, N. Application of stochastic models for predicting water quality in Dam—Lake Thesaurus, Greece. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference: Protection and Restoration of the Environment XII, Skiathos, Greece, 29 June–3 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Parshall flume (conventional) gauging station, Iokastis Stream area, Kavala city, Greece.
Figure 1. Parshall flume (conventional) gauging station, Iokastis Stream area, Kavala city, Greece.
Environsciproc 02 00070 g001
Figure 2. ANN (M17.10.1) architecture plot of Iiokastis-Chrisostomou Smirnis Stream.
Figure 2. ANN (M17.10.1) architecture plot of Iiokastis-Chrisostomou Smirnis Stream.
Environsciproc 02 00070 g002
Figure 3. ANN (M17.10.1) validation performance plot of Iokastis-Chrisostomou Smirnis Stream.
Figure 3. ANN (M17.10.1) validation performance plot of Iokastis-Chrisostomou Smirnis Stream.
Environsciproc 02 00070 g003
Figure 4. ANN (M17.10.1) training regression performance plots of Perigiali-Chrisostomou Smirnis Stream.
Figure 4. ANN (M17.10.1) training regression performance plots of Perigiali-Chrisostomou Smirnis Stream.
Environsciproc 02 00070 g004
Figure 5. Discrepancy ratio plot of Perigiali Stream (ANN M17.10.1).
Figure 5. Discrepancy ratio plot of Perigiali Stream (ANN M17.10.1).
Environsciproc 02 00070 g005
Table 1. Statistical criteria values of Perigiali Stream (ANN M17.10.1).
Table 1. Statistical criteria values of Perigiali Stream (ANN M17.10.1).
Number of Paired ValuesRMSE (ltrs/s)RE (%)ECrr2Discrepancy Ratio
490.0718−0.00540.93030.96640.93401.0000
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Papalaskaris, T. Artificial Neural Network for Daily Low Stream Flow Rate Prediction of Iokastis Stream, Kavala City, NE Greece, NE Mediterranean Basin. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2020, 2, 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2020002070

AMA Style

Papalaskaris T. Artificial Neural Network for Daily Low Stream Flow Rate Prediction of Iokastis Stream, Kavala City, NE Greece, NE Mediterranean Basin. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2020; 2(1):70. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2020002070

Chicago/Turabian Style

Papalaskaris, Thomas. 2020. "Artificial Neural Network for Daily Low Stream Flow Rate Prediction of Iokastis Stream, Kavala City, NE Greece, NE Mediterranean Basin" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 2, no. 1: 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2020002070

APA Style

Papalaskaris, T. (2020). Artificial Neural Network for Daily Low Stream Flow Rate Prediction of Iokastis Stream, Kavala City, NE Greece, NE Mediterranean Basin. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 2(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2020002070

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop