Review Reports
by
- Aloyce I. M. Amasi1,*,
- Maarten Wynants2 and
- Remigius A. Kawala3
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Please see the attachment
Comments for author File:
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File:
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
See attached file
Comments for author File:
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File:
Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
The authors have followed most of the recommendations given. Therefore, as a consequence of the changes and corrections incorporated in this new version, the scientific quality of the manuscript has considerably improved. Then, it can be accepted.