You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Aloyce I. M. Amasi1,*,
  • Maarten Wynants2 and
  • Remigius A. Kawala3
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see the attachment

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

See attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have followed most of the recommendations given. Therefore, as a consequence of the changes and corrections incorporated in this new version, the scientific quality of the manuscript has considerably improved. Then, it can be accepted.