In submitting conference proceedings to Engineering Proceedings, the Volume Editors of the proceedings would like to certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review by the designated expert referees and were administered by the Volume Editors strictly following the policies announced on the conference website [1].
The whole process was supervised by the conference committee and the Volume Editors and adhered to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by MDPI and complied with the peer review policy and guidelines of Engineering Proceedings, which can be found at the following link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/engproc/instruction_for_conference_organizers. The review reports were checked and archived by the Editorial Office of Engineering Proceedings.
- Type of peer review: double-blind
- Number of submissions received: 28
- Number of submissions sent for review: 27
- Number of submissions accepted: 21
- Number of submission published: 20
- Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 75%
- Average number of reviews per paper: 1.8
- Total number of reviewers involved: 51
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Reference
- Instructions for Authors. Available online: https://eem.tfzv.ues.rs.ba/page/instructions-for-authors (accessed on 30 May 2025).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).