Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Fused Isoxazoles: A Comprehensive Review
Previous Article in Journal
From Process to System: A Review on the Implications of Concrete 3D Printing on Project Delivery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Evaluating the Wear and Mechanical Properties of Cotton Fabrics for Women’s Summer Clothing †

by
Natrayan Lakshmaiya
1,
Kunnathur Periyasamy Yuvaraj
2,
Seeniappan Kaliappan
3,
Vinay Kumar Reddy
4 and
Haleem Mohammed Ali
5,*
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, SIMATS, Chennai 602107, Tamil Nadu, India
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore 641008, Tamil Nadu, India
3
Department of Mechatronics Engineering, KCG College of Technology, Karapakkam, Chennai 600097, Tamil Nadu, India
4
Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, SR University, Warangal 506371, Telangana, India
5
Department of Mechanical Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology-Ramapuram Campus, Chennai 600089, Tamil Nadu, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the International Conference on Processing and Performance of Materials, Chennai, India, 2–3 March 2023.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 61(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024061015
Published: 29 January 2024

Abstract

Recyclable yarn has become increasingly significant because of growing environmental consciousness and the necessity to acquire or enhance the qualities of woven materials in the years to come. A cotton yarn’s tensile strength, rip strength, and permeability to air were examined to obtain the intended outcomes. The experiment was carried out on specimens with almost identical structures, and the impact of the weaving and various weft materials was evaluated. This endeavor aims to find the right blend or blends of regenerated fibers to substitute 100% cotton garments. The mechanical strength and physiological characteristics of Tencel textiles mixed with other regenerate cellulose yarns were compared to those of 100% cotton to attain the same or possibly superior end qualities. Thus, cotton fibers, viscosity, Tencel, modal, and hemp were used. Standard thread counts of 20 tex were used to make mixed plain woven textiles made of 100% cotton and 50:50 mixes of Tencel with other regenerating materials. The ergonomic qualities, such as air permeability, and mechanical characteristics (tension and tearing assets, pilling, abrasion resistance, and warp- and weft-wise) were assessed. It has been discovered that textiles combined with Tencel perform better than cotton ones. Consequently, it may be said that 100% cotton textiles can be replaced with a Tencel combination, using these regenerating fibers.
Keywords: tear strength; tensile properties; air permeability; cotton fiber; women summer cloth tear strength; tensile properties; air permeability; cotton fiber; women summer cloth

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lakshmaiya, N.; Yuvaraj, K.P.; Kaliappan, S.; Reddy, V.K.; Ali, H.M. Evaluating the Wear and Mechanical Properties of Cotton Fabrics for Women’s Summer Clothing. Eng. Proc. 2024, 61, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024061015

AMA Style

Lakshmaiya N, Yuvaraj KP, Kaliappan S, Reddy VK, Ali HM. Evaluating the Wear and Mechanical Properties of Cotton Fabrics for Women’s Summer Clothing. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 61(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024061015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lakshmaiya, Natrayan, Kunnathur Periyasamy Yuvaraj, Seeniappan Kaliappan, Vinay Kumar Reddy, and Haleem Mohammed Ali. 2024. "Evaluating the Wear and Mechanical Properties of Cotton Fabrics for Women’s Summer Clothing" Engineering Proceedings 61, no. 1: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024061015

APA Style

Lakshmaiya, N., Yuvaraj, K. P., Kaliappan, S., Reddy, V. K., & Ali, H. M. (2024). Evaluating the Wear and Mechanical Properties of Cotton Fabrics for Women’s Summer Clothing. Engineering Proceedings, 61(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024061015

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop