Next Article in Journal
Framework for Energy Performance Measurement of Residential Buildings Considering Occupants’ Energy Use Behavior
Previous Article in Journal
The Behavior of Pre-Treated Crumb Rubber and Polypropylene-Fiber-Incorporated Mortar Subjected to Elevated Temperatures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Efficiency and Sustainability: Enhancing Mortar Mixtures with Wastepaper Sludge Ash †

Department of Civil Engineering, Comsats University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, Abbottabad 22020, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 5th Conference on Sustainability in Civil Engineering (CSCE), Online, 3 August 2023.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 44(1), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023044013
Published: 25 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 5th Conference on Sustainability in Civil Engineering)

Abstract

:
The study aims to increase the efficiency of mortar mixes and improve their necessary qualities such as strength, density, and durability by using wastepaper as a cement substitute in the form of wastepaper sludge ash (WPSA). Mortars with 20, 25, and 30% cement replacement were tested. Due to less use of cement and greater usage of WPSA, CO2 and SO2 emissions can be reduced. The chemical properties of WPSA were compared to those of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC). Testing showed that WPSA had similar cementitious properties. Results demonstrate the potential applications of this mortar in a variety of settings where increased toughness and equivalent characteristics are needed while still preserving the environment.

1. Introduction

The global population rapidly increases with time, which puts increased pressure on urban construction including residential, commercial, and industrial buildings. This has led to an increase in the need for cement use worldwide [1,2]. One of the most versatile fundamental construction materials is cement [3,4]. However, the cement sector is characterized by significant levels of energy consumption [5,6] and greenhouse gas emissions [7,8]. Around the globe, the cement industry emits roughly 7% of carbon dioxide (CO2) [8,9]. Therefore, in order to lessen this influence on the environment, it is necessary to investigate a viable cement substitute [10]. Reusing waste materials rather than disposing of them in landfills is a practical and affordable solution to these problems [11,12]. Paper recycling industries produce wastes called wastepaper sludge and wastepaper sludge ash (WPSA). The chemical composition of WPSA varies; it usually includes lime (CaO), silica (SiO2), and alumina (Al2O3) and can be used as a supplemental cementitious material (SCM) [13]. The primary objective of this research is to develop a green technology material. WPSA has been used in concrete, bricks, and in studies instead of mortar. Our goal is to develop an eco-friendly and effective mortar for construction purposes. Mortar is also used to repair joints and cracks. By replacing 25% of cement with WPSA in mortar mixes we can obtain such efficient mortar.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

A proportional mixture of Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and wastepaper sludge ash (WPSA) was used as a cementitious material. Wastepaper sludge was collected from private schools and universities of Abbottabad. It was dried in the sun for 12 to 15 days and then burnt in an electric furnace at 750 °C for 2 h to make ash. The composition of the WPSA, analyzed via X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), is presented in Table 1. It consists primarily of calcium and can serve as a binding material.

2.2. Methods

Mortar mix ratios for ‘MC’ samples for each ratio were prepared according to ASTM-C109 by partially replacing 0, 20, 25, and 30% of cement with WPSA by weight. The sand-to-binder ratio was taken as 1:2.75 and the water-to-cement ratio used for mixing was restricted to 0.48. Weights and proportioning data are shown in Table 2.

3. Results

3.1. Flowability

The study conducted showed that when the percentage of WPSA increased, the workability of the mortar decreased. Figure 1 displays the results of this research.

3.2. Compressive Strength

Mortar cubes with 25% WPSA exhibited favourable compressive strengths of 19.1 (CTM) and 18 MPa (RH). In comparison, the cubes with 20% and 30% WPSA replacements showed lower compressive strengths as shown in Figure 2. Therefore, replacing 25% of cement with WPSA results in a mixture that can be used for environmentally friendly construction purposes.

3.3. Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity

The test was conducted according to ASTM C597-02. The UPV results for WPSA replaced samples are shown in Figure 3. These results suggest that the 25% WPSA sample had higher velocity, indicating the most uniform mass, and similar quality.

3.4. Water Absorption

The test was conducted according to ASTM C642-9. It was found that the addition of 25% WPSA to mortar mixtures resulted a significantly lower water absorption rate compared to other replacements, as depicted in Figure 4.
When 25% of the cement was replaced with WPSA, it increased the volume of the mixture and reduced internal voids, resulting in a denser mixture as given in Table 3.

3.5. Acid Attack (HCL)

In this study, HCL with a pH value of 3.01 was used to test the durability of the mortar samples. The results of the acid durability test showed that the acid resistance of the WPSA samples slightly decreased as the WPSA content increased. The results are shown in Figure 5.

4. Conclusions

  • The chemical properties of WPSA showed similar behaviour to that of cement. A high calcium content in the WPSA results in good quality and characteristics of the mortar.
  • Replacement of 25% WPSA with cement showed favourable ultimate compressive strength and reduced water absorption by approximately 60%.
  • The technique developed in this study can be used in runoff structures, sewage pipes, canal surfaces, and wall plastering.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S. and M.F.J.; methodology, A.S.; validation, A.S., A.I. and M.F.J.; formal analysis, A.S.; investigation M.F.J.; resources, A.I.; data curation, A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.; writing—review and editing, A.S.; supervision, M.F.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alves, A.V.; Vieira, T.F.; De Brito, J.; Correia, J.R. Mechanical properties of structural concrete with fine recycled ceramic aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 64, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nasr, M.S.; Hussain, T.; Kubba, H.; Shubbar, A.A. Influence of Using High Volume Fraction of Silica Fume on Mechanical and Durability Properties of Cement Mortar. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2020, 15, 2494–2506. [Google Scholar]
  3. Azevedo, A.R.G.; Cecchin, D.; Carmo, D.F.; Silva, F.C.; Campos, C.M.O.; Shtrucka, T.G.; Marvila, M.T.; Monteiro, S.N. Analysis of the compactness and properties of the hardened state of mortars with recycling of construction and demolition waste (CDW). J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 5942–5952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Marvila, M.T.; Azevedo, A.R.G.; Monteiro, S.N. Verification of the application potential of the mathematical models of lyse, abrams and molinari in mortars based on cement and lime. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 7327–7334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Atmaca, A.; Yumrutaş, R. Analysis of the parameters affecting energy consumption of a rotary kiln in cement industry. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 66, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Amaral, L.F.; Girondi Delaqua, G.C.; Nicolite, M.; Marvila, M.T.; de Azevedo, A.R.G.; Alexandre, J.; Fontes Vieira, C.M.; Monteiro, S.N. Eco-friendly mortars with addition of ornamental stone waste—A mathematical model approach for granulometric optimization. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 248, 119283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pacheco-Torgal, F.; Jalali, S. Compressive strength and durability properties of ceramic wastes based concrete. Mater. Struct. Constr. 2011, 44, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. De Azevedo, A.R.G.; Alexandre, J.; Xavier, G.d.C.; Pedroti, L.G. Recycling paper industry effluent sludge for use in mortars: A sustainability perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 192, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abed, M.; Nasr, M.; Hasan, Z. Effect of silica fume/binder ratio on compressive strength development of reactive powder concrete under two curing systems. MATEC Web Conf. 2018, 162, 10–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shubbar, A.A.; Al-Jumeily, D.; Aljaaf, A.J.; Alyafei, M.; Sadique, M.; Mustafina, J. Investigating the mechanical and durability performance of cement mortar incorporated modified fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag as cement replacement materials. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE), Kazan, Russia, 7–10 October 2019; pp. 434–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jang, H.S.; Lim, Y.T.; Kang, J.H.; So, S.Y.; So, H.S. Influence of calcination and cooling conditions on pozzolanic reactivity of paper mill sludge. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 166, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. De Azevedo, A.R.G.; Alexandre, J.; Pessanha, L.S.P.; Manhães, R.d.S.T.; de Brito, J.; Marvila, M.T. Characterizing the paper industry sludge for environmentally-safe disposal. Waste Manag. 2019, 95, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. García, R.; Vigil de la Villa, R.; Vegas, I.; Frías, M.; Sánchez de Rojas, M.I. The pozzolanic properties of paper sludge waste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22, 1484–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow/workability of 0, 20, 25, 30% WPSA mortar mix.
Figure 1. Flow/workability of 0, 20, 25, 30% WPSA mortar mix.
Engproc 44 00013 g001
Figure 2. Compressive strength results (CTM and RH).
Figure 2. Compressive strength results (CTM and RH).
Engproc 44 00013 g002
Figure 3. Ultrasonic pulse velocity results for 150 mm long samples.
Figure 3. Ultrasonic pulse velocity results for 150 mm long samples.
Engproc 44 00013 g003
Figure 4. Water absorption results for 0, 20, 25, 30% WPSA mortar samples.
Figure 4. Water absorption results for 0, 20, 25, 30% WPSA mortar samples.
Engproc 44 00013 g004
Figure 5. Loss of strength (%) in WPSA mortar samples.
Figure 5. Loss of strength (%) in WPSA mortar samples.
Engproc 44 00013 g005
Table 1. Chemical/elemental composition of WPSA.
Table 1. Chemical/elemental composition of WPSA.
Empirical FormulaWPSA (%)
Ca75.37
Si17.096
S4.397
Fe1.994
K0.428
Ti0.263
Sr0.184
Zn0.114
Cu0.072
Mn0.049
Zr0.027
V0.007
Table 2. Mix proportion of WPSA, cement, sand, and water.
Table 2. Mix proportion of WPSA, cement, sand, and water.
NameCementSandWPSAWater
MC-0500 g1375 g0 g242 g
MC-20400 g1375 g100 g242 g
MC-25375 g1375 g125 g242 g
MC-30350 g1375 g150 g242 g
Table 3. Bulk density values for WPSA mortar samples.
Table 3. Bulk density values for WPSA mortar samples.
WPSA (%)Density (g/cm³)
0%2.174
20%2.18
25%2.204
30%2.065
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shafique, A.; Ihsan, A.; Javed, M.F. Efficiency and Sustainability: Enhancing Mortar Mixtures with Wastepaper Sludge Ash. Eng. Proc. 2023, 44, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023044013

AMA Style

Shafique A, Ihsan A, Javed MF. Efficiency and Sustainability: Enhancing Mortar Mixtures with Wastepaper Sludge Ash. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 44(1):13. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023044013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shafique, Asad, Ahsin Ihsan, and Muhammad Faisal Javed. 2023. "Efficiency and Sustainability: Enhancing Mortar Mixtures with Wastepaper Sludge Ash" Engineering Proceedings 44, no. 1: 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023044013

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop