Next Article in Journal
Applying Data Mining and Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Powerlifting Results
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Relationship between Kansei Design Elements of Taiwanese Wooden Furniture and Consumer Demand by Fuzzy Theory
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Engineering Proceedings
Volume 30
Issue 1
10.3390/engproc2023030021
engproc-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Russel Torah
1,*,
Kai Yang
2,
Theodore Hughes-Riley
3 and
Stephen Beeby
1
1
School of Electronics & Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
2
Winchester School of Art, University of Southampton, Southampton SO23 8DL, UK
3
Advanced Textiles Research Group, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
All papers published in the volume are presented at the 4th International Conference on the Challenges, Opportunities, Innovations and Applications in Electronic Textiles, Nottingham, UK, 8–10 November 2022.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 30(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023030021
Published: 29 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Conference on the Challenges, Opportunities, Innovations and Applications in Electronic Textiles)
Versions Notes
In submitting conference proceedings to Engineering Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: triple open reviews;
  • Conference submission management system: Web form + Excel;
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 56;
  • Number of submissions accepted: 39 (12 oral, 27 posters);
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 70% overall, 31% oral;
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 3;
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 28;
  • Any additional information on the review process: None.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Torah, R.; Yang, K.; Hughes-Riley, T.; Beeby, S. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2023, 30, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023030021

AMA Style

Torah R, Yang K, Hughes-Riley T, Beeby S. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 30(1):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023030021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Torah, Russel, Kai Yang, Theodore Hughes-Riley, and Stephen Beeby. 2023. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 30, no. 1: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023030021

APA Style

Torah, R., Yang, K., Hughes-Riley, T., & Beeby, S. (2023). Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings, 30(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023030021

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop