Next Article in Journal
Biomechanical Assessment of Walking in Simulated Low-Vision Conditions Using a Visual Aid Device
Previous Article in Journal
Toward Robust Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: Cross-Dataset Evaluation of SVM-Based Machine Learning Models
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Spiros Pantelakis
1,*,
Andreas Strohmayer
2 and
Gustavo Alonso
3
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering & Aeronautics, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
2
Institute of Aircraft Design, University of Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
3
School of Aeronautical and Space Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Rectorado A, Ramiro de Maeztu 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
All papers published in this volume are presented at the 15th EASN International Conference, Madrid, Spain, 14–17 October 2025.
Eng. Proc. 2026, 133(1), 206; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133206
Published: 8 July 2026
In submitting conference proceedings to Engineering Proceedings, the Volume Editors of the proceedings would like to certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review by the designated expert referees and were administered by the Volume Editors strictly following the policies announced on the conference website [1].
The whole process was supervised by the conference committee and the Volume Editors and adhered to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by MDPI and complied with the peer review policy and guidelines of Engineering Proceedings, which can be found at the following link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/engproc/instruction_for_conference_organizers, accessed on 1 July 2026. The review reports were checked and archived by the Editorial Office of Engineering Proceedings.
  • Type of peer review: single-blind
  • Conference submission management system: Conference Submission Platform/Email
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 263
  • Number of submissions accepted: 216
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 82%
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 1.73
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 89

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Reference

  1. EASN 2025 Publication Policy. Available online: https://easnconference.eu/2025/authors-info/publication-policy/ (accessed on 1 July 2026).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pantelakis, S.; Strohmayer, A.; Alonso, G. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2026, 133, 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133206

AMA Style

Pantelakis S, Strohmayer A, Alonso G. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2026; 133(1):206. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133206

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pantelakis, Spiros, Andreas Strohmayer, and Gustavo Alonso. 2026. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 133, no. 1: 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133206

APA Style

Pantelakis, S., Strohmayer, A., & Alonso, G. (2026). Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings, 133(1), 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133206

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop