Statement of Peer Review †
- Type of peer review: single-blind
- Conference submission management system: Conference Submission Platform/Email
- Number of submissions sent for review: 263
- Number of submissions accepted: 216
- Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 82%
- Average number of reviews per paper: 1.73
- Total number of reviewers involved: 89
Conflicts of Interest
Reference
- EASN 2025 Publication Policy. Available online: https://easnconference.eu/2025/authors-info/publication-policy/ (accessed on 1 July 2026).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Pantelakis, S.; Strohmayer, A.; Alonso, G. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2026, 133, 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133206
Pantelakis S, Strohmayer A, Alonso G. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2026; 133(1):206. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133206
Chicago/Turabian StylePantelakis, Spiros, Andreas Strohmayer, and Gustavo Alonso. 2026. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 133, no. 1: 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133206
APA StylePantelakis, S., Strohmayer, A., & Alonso, G. (2026). Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings, 133(1), 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133206

