Next Article in Journal
Development and Characterization of an Apricot-Coconut Water Kefir Beverage: Evaluation of Physicochemical, Antioxidant, and Sensory Attributes
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Implementation of Interactive Teaching Materials for Core Blockchain Concepts on OwlSpace Platform as a Capstone Project
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Phytochemical Screening and In Vitro Antioxidant Analysis of Colebrookea oppositifolia Sm. Extract †

1
SRM Modi Nagar College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science & Technology (SRMIST), Delhi-NCR Campus, Ghaziabad 201204, Uttar Pradesh, India
2
ICFAI School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The ICFAI University Jaipur, Jaipur 302031, Rajasthan, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 6th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences, 9–11 December 2025; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/ASEC2025.
Eng. Proc. 2026, 124(1), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026124030
Published: 13 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 6th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences)

Abstract

Dementia, a major cause of dependency, disability, and mortality, is characterized by a progressive cognitive decline. Alzheimer’s disease, a major neurodegenerative dementia, primarily affects the elderly. This study aimed to investigate the antioxidant and neuroprotective potential of plant phytoconstituents for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Phytoconstituents of Colebrookea oppositifolia Sm. were investigated using aerial and root extracts. The antioxidant potential of the plant phytoconstituents was assessed using in vitro antioxidant assays such as 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) and Ferric-Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) assay. The plant extract (root) showed significant antioxidant potential. Additional studies are underway to comprehensively evaluate its potential applications.

1. Introduction

Dementia is becoming a more significant public health issue, and there are national and worldwide initiatives to speed up the diagnosis process. Even though the number of dementia sufferers is steadily rising, only 50% to 65% of cases are diagnosed in high-income nations; rates are significantly lower in low- and middle-income countries [1]. In addition to being the seventh most common cause of death worldwide, dementia is a significant contributor to reliance and impairment [2]. Numerous neurodegenerative and non-neurodegenerative illnesses can, and frequently do, cause impairment in patients with dementia. Alzheimer’s disease (AD), which mostly affects the elderly population (5–6% of those 65 and over, and up to 30% of those 85 and older), is regarded as the major neurodegenerative dementia. Multiple hypotheses—amyloid-β, tau, inflammation, oxidative stress, and cholinergic neuron loss—have guided Alzheimer’s disease drug development. Oxidative stress plays a significant role in Alzheimer’s disease, as the brain’s high oxygen consumption increases exposure to reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to protein and lipid oxidation and Aβ accumulation; therefore, antioxidants have been explored to slow disease progression [3]. The burden of AD will be quite significant over the next ten years, affecting hundreds of millions of people, their families, and national health care systems due to aging patterns, particularly in industrialized nations. According to epidemiological data, one in three Americans over 85 will develop AD, and the number of Americans over 85 will treble by 2050. One of the top five causes of death in developed nations is AD [4]. In elderly adults, AD begins to manifest ten years or more before a diagnosis is made. The moderate cognitive impairment (MCI) phase, which can last for several years, is the initial stage that patients with AD experience. Additionally, MCI is divided into early- and late-stage features. Alternatives for AD diagnosis include brain imaging tests and equipment, such as various positron emission tomography (PET) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machines. Furthermore, cerebrospinal fluid has been shown to include molecular indicators such as phosphorylated tau and amyloid-beta isoform 42 (Aβ-42) [4]. There is presently no known cure for Alzheimer’s disease, despite a great deal of study, and the efficacy of current treatments has been questionable. To address the increasing burden of Alzheimer’s disease, pharmaceutical approaches that reduce or stop the illness’s incidence and progression are essential. A few drugs such as donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, and memantine are approved by the FDA for the treatment of AD [5]. Numerous molecules originating from Ayurvedic medicinal plants are now undergoing clinical trials, making them a viable route for drug discovery. The possible use of many Ayurvedic medicinal plants and their derivatives in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease has been investigated in scientific investigations [6]. Ashwagandha, Brahmi, Ginkgo biloba, Saffron, Turmeric, Cordia dichotoma, Acorus calamus and many more medicinal herbs hold great promise for both preventing and treating AD-related cognitive impairment. In order to treat AD symptoms including depression, memory loss, and reduced cognition, traditional medicinal practices prescribe a range of plants and their active constituents [7]. Plants contain a number of secondary metabolites, or phytochemicals, that can improve human health by preventing and treating diseases. Numerous phytochemicals, or plant metabolites, from the previous literature have undergone clinical testing to see if they can affect the immune system [8].
Compared to conventional drugs, plants are a cost-effective and safe source of traditional medicines that help treat a wide range of illnesses, including immune system disorders. The use of botanical supplements for immune defense reactions in the body can result in safe and efficient immunity responses, according to evidence reported in textual sources such as Traditional Chinese medicine and Indian Ayurvedic medicine. Colebrookea oppositifolia Smith is a significant traditional medicinal plant which belongs to the Lamiaceae family. It is a thick shrub that resembles wool and is mostly found in subtropical areas of several Asian nations, including China and India. It has been used extensively to treat conditions affecting the neurological system, such as epilepsy. Because polyphenols and flavonoids are the plant’s primary chemical components, its active ingredients have demonstrated antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antifungal qualities [9]. Acteoside, a phytoconstituent present in a variety of plants, has drawn notice for its anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective qualities, indicating a possible role in treating AD through dietary treatments. Olives and a number of other plants, including Verbascum species, contain verbascoside, also known as acteoside, a phenylethanoid glycoside. Chronic neuroinflammation plays a major role in the development of AD. By reducing microglia activation, and reducing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, acteoside has been demonstrated to have anti-inflammatory properties [10]. The ethnopharmacological research on acteoside includes an analysis of its cultural and historical uses in traditional medicine. Table 1 lists some of the medicinal plants and their phytoconstituents that are used to treat AD, and the studies are documented in the scientific database.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Plant Collection and Extraction

Colebrookea oppositifolia Sm.was collected from the Nainital region of Uttarakhand, India. Extraction of the plant material was carried out using alcohol as the solvent with a Soxhlet apparatus to yield the final crude extract.

2.2. Chemical Used

Plant extract, distilled water, Mayer’s reagent, sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, chloroform, bromine water, glacial acetic acid, ferric chloride, potassium persulfate, ABTS, TPTZ, ascorbic acid, acetate buffer, ethanol, and methanol; all chemicals were purchased from OM Scientific Chemicals, India.

2.3. Phytochemical Screening of Secondary Metabolites Including Alkaloids Flavonoids, Steroidal Compounds, Tannins, Glycosides, Saponins and Terpenoids

The process of identifying the various classes of phytoconstituents found in different plant sections is known as phytochemical screening. The substances found naturally in plants are called phytochemicals. Among the many different types of chemical components found in plants are alkaloids, glycosides, phenol, flavonoids, terpenoids, and saponins. Phytochemical screening is useful for identifying bioactive substances that can be helpful for targeting the molecular mechanisms of diseases and determining which compounds predominate over the others [18]. The following standard techniques were used to evaluate the presence of phytochemicals in the plant extracts (aerial and root extracts).
A drop of Mayer’s reagent was applied to the side of a test tube containing a few milliliters of the filtrates. The test is positive for alkaloids if a creamy or white precipitate forms [19].
Two milliliters of 2% NaOH were combined with an aqueous plant crude extract, resulting in a bright yellow color. However, when two drops of diluted acid were added, the mixture turned colorless. This outcome indicated that flavonoids were present [20].
Five milliliters of aqueous plant crude extract were mixed with two milliliters of chloroform and concentrated H2SO4. A red coloration emerged in the bottom chloroform layer, signifying the presence of steroids [20].
The 0.5 g aqueous extract was mixed with 10 ml of bromine water. The presence of tannins was indicated by the decolorization of bromine water [20].
Ten milliliters of aqueous plant extract and one milliliter of concentrated H2SO4 were combined with a solution of glacial acetic acid (4 milliliters) and one drop of 2% FeCl3. The presence of cardiac steroidal glycosides was observed as a brown ring formed between the layers [20].
In a test tube, 5 ml of distilled water and aqueous crude plant extract were well combined. When a few drops of olive oil were added and well stirred, the appearance of foam indicated the presence of saponins [20].
After adding 2.0 ml of chloroform to 5 ml of aqueous plant extract and letting it evaporate, 3 ml of concentrated H2SO4 was heated. Terpenoids were revealed by the appearance of a gray color [20].

2.4. Antioxidant Assay

2.4.1. 2,2′-Azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic Acid) (ABTS Radical Cation Decolorization) Assay

The ABTS stock solution was made by reacting equal parts of ABTS aqueous solution (7 mM) and potassium persulfate aqueous solution (2.45 mM). The combination was then left to stand at room temperature in the dark for 12 to 16 h before being used. The stock solution was diluted with methanol to produce the working solution of ABTS. Next, 1 mL of the extracts at varying concentrations was combined with 2 mL of ABTS solution. After that, the mixture was incubated in the dark for precisely ten minutes at room temperature. Two milliliters of ABTS solution and one milliliter of double-distilled water were combined to create the control. A spectrophotometer was used to measure the absorbance at 734 nm in comparison to a blank. Three duplicates of each sample were produced and measured. The method was used to determine each extract’s percentage of scavenging activity on ABTS as % inhibition [21].

2.4.2. Ferric-Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay

This technique relies on the sample’s capacity to convert Fe3+ ions to Fe2+ ions. The ferric-tripyridyltriazine (Fe3+-TPTZ) complex is reduced to the ferrous (Fe2+-TPTZ) form at low pH in the presence of TPTZ, resulting in the development of a vivid blue color with an absorption maximum at 593 nm. 0.7 mL of the aqueous extracts at varying concentrations (0.5-5.0 mg/mL) was combined with 2.3 mL of the FRAP reagent. After that, the mixture was incubated in the dark for 30 min at 37 °C. Using a spectrophotometer, the absorbance was measured at 593 nm against a blank. An increase in the reaction mixture’s absorbance indicates a greater capacity for reduction. Samples were measured three times. The standard was ascorbic acid. The regression formula was created from a similar approach that was used to prepare a standard curve of ascorbic acid solution. Ascorbic acid equivalents (AAE) in milligrams per milliliter of extract were used to express the results [21].

3. Result

The three independent determinations’ mean ± standard deviation (SD) was used to express all experimental results (n = 3) (different days with a minimum interval of 24 h). Statistical software was used to determine the antioxidant parameters.

3.1. Percentage Yield of Plant Extract (Aerial and Root)

The yield percentage of the aerial plant extract was 13.80 percent (w/w), and for the root extract it was 14.10 percent (w/w) when the semi-solid residue was lyophilized to create a fine powder, as already reported in our previous findings [10].

3.2. Phytochemical Assay

Table 2 displays the findings of the phytochemical screening that was carried out utilizing chemical analysis for both the aerial and root plant extracts. The phytochemicals results were recorded as present (+) or absent (–) according to the results obtained from the respective chemical assays in the laboratory process.

3.3. Antioxidant Assay

ABTS and FRAP tests were used to assess the antioxidant activity of the root and aerial extracts. The antioxidant effects of both extracts were concentration-dependent, although the activity of the root extract was much higher than that of the aerial extract. The root extract showed a higher percentage of radical scavenging activity in the ABTS assay, as shown in Table 3. Similar to this, the root extract showed noticeably better ferric-reducing capacity in the FRAP experiment, as evidenced by higher absorbance values at 593 nm and higher ascorbic acid equivalent (AAE) values, as shown in Table 4. Collectively, the results of the antioxidant parameters indicate that the root extract had higher in vitro antioxidant properties. The values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).

4. Discussion

The results demonstrate potent antioxidant properties of plant extracts, as evidenced by their strong radical scavenging and reducing activities shown in Table 3 and Table 4. These antioxidant effects are particularly relevant to the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease, where oxidative stress plays a central role in neuronal damage, protein oxidation, lipid peroxidation, and amyloid-β accumulation. By reducing oxidative stress, such antioxidants may help protect neuronal cells and could contribute to therapeutic strategies aimed at slowing the progression of Alzheimer’s disease.
Strong antioxidant activity, especially in the root extract, indicates that it may be able to lessen neuronal damage caused by oxidative stress. The presence of phenolic phytoconstituents, particularly acteoside (verbascoside), a well-researched glycoside with strong antioxidant, neuroprotective, and free-radical-scavenging qualities, may be primarily responsible for this effect. As a result, the antioxidant qualities shown in this ongoing research emphasize the medicinal potential of this plant extract in managing Alzheimer’s disease via modulation of oxidative stress. In vivo and pathway-based research is needed to confirm the neuroprotective effectiveness of acteoside and clarify its molecular mechanisms and target profile.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this ongoing study supports continued investigations of the plant root extract, which shows greater pharmacological potential as a natural source of antioxidants for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. In vitro results indicate potential antioxidant activity, notably associated with acteoside; further in vivo research is needed to evaluate efficacy and safety using suitable animal models. For better understanding and more robust results, a thorough investigation of molecular processes such as oxidative stress regulation, β-amyloid aggregation, neuroinflammatory pathways, and cholinergic signaling can be combined with biochemical, histological and hormonal assays.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M. and P.K.; methodology, R.M.; software, R.M.; validation, R.M., S.K.S. and P.K.; writing—original draft preparation, R.M.; writing—review and editing, R.M., S.K.S. and P.K.; supervision, S.K.S. and P.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data for this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the SRM Institute of Science and Technology for providing the research facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ADAlzheimer’s disease
MCIModerate cognitive impairment
PETPositron emission tomography
MRIMagnetic resonance imaging
Amyloid-beta
ABTS2,2′-Azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)
FRAPFerric-Reducing Antioxidant Power
Fe3+-TPTZFerric-tripyridyltriazine
AAEAscorbic acid equivalent
SDStandard deviation

References

  1. Kusoro, O.; Roche, M.; Del-Pino-Casado, R.; Leung, P.; Orgeta, V. Time to Diagnosis in Dementia: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2025, 40, e70129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wimo, A.; Seeher, K.; Cataldi, R.; Cyhlarova, E.; Dielemann, J.L.; Frisell, O.; Guerchet, M.; Jönsson, L.; Malaha, A.K.; Nichols, E.; et al. The worldwide costs of dementia in 2019. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2023, 19, 2865–2873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Malik, R.; Kalra, S.; Bhatia, S.; Al Harrasi, A.; Singh, G.; Mohan, S.; Makeen, H.A.; Albratty, M.; Meraya, A.; Bahar, B.; et al. Overview of therapeutic targets in management of dementia. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 152, 113168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gunes, S.; Aizawa, Y.; Sugashi, T.; Sugimoto, M.; Rodrigues, P.P. Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease in the Current State: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sharifi-Rad, J.; Rapposelli, S.; Sestito, S.; Herrera-Bravo, J.; Arancibia-Diaz, A.; Salazar, L.A.; Yeskaliyeva, B.; Beyatli, A.; Leyva-Gómez, G.; González-Contreras, C.; et al. Multi-Target Mechanisms of Phytochemicals in Alzheimer’s Disease: Effects on Oxidative Stress, Neuroinflammation and Protein Aggregation. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bordoloi, S.; Pathak, K.; Devi, M.; Saikia, R.; Das, J.; Kashyap, V.H.; Das, D.; Ahmad, M.Z.; Abdel-Wahab, B.A. Some promising medicinal plants used in Alzheimer’s disease: An ethnopharmacological perspective. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2024, 6, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Malik, R.; Kalra, S.; Pooja; Singh, G.; Meenu; Gahlot, V.; Kajal, A. Rimpy Antioxidative and neuroprotective potential of Acorus calamus linn. and Cordia dichotoma G. Forst. In Alzheimer’s type dementia in rodent. Brain Res. 2023, 1822, 148616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hooda, P.; Malik, R.; Bhatia, S.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Najmi, A.; Zoghebi, K.; Halawi, M.A.; Makeen, H.A.; Mohan, S. Phytoimmunomodulators: A review of natural modulators for complex immune system. Heliyon 2023, 10, e23790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kumar, D.; Singla, R.K.; Sharma, R.; Sharma, P.; Kumar, L.; Kaur, N.; Dhawan, R.K.; Sharma, S.; Dua, K. Phytochemistry and Polypharmacological Potential of Colebrookea oppositifolia Smith. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2023, 23, 334–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Malik, R.; Mittal, A.; Kumar, P. Antioxidant Potential of Colebrookea oppositifolia Sm. Extracts: An In Vitro Screening Study. Eng. Proc. 2025, 87, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alnasser, M.N.; Alboraiy, G.M.; Alsowig, E.M.; Alqattan, F.M. Cholinesterase Inhibitors from Plants and Their Potential in Alzheimer’s Treatment: Systematic Review. Brain Sci. 2025, 15, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Koul, B.; Farooq, U.; Yadav, D.; Song, M. Phytochemicals: A Promising Alternative for the Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease. Life 2023, 13, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sujana, M.; Tejaswi, P.; Padma, K.R.; Mohan, M.R.A.S.; Josthna, P. Medicinal Plants as Neuroprotective Agents in Neurodegenerative Disorders. J. Biochem. Technol. 2025, 16, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Tian, J.; Ni, J.; Wei, M.; Li, T.; Shi, J. Polygala tenuifolia and Acorus tatarinowii in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 14, 1268000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Reza-Zaldívar, E.E.; Jacobo-Velázquez, D.A. Comprehensive Review of Nutraceuticals against Cognitive Decline Associated with Alzheimer’s Disease. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 35499–35522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pavlov, S.; Prajapati, S.K.; Yadav, D.; Marcano-Rodriguez, A.; Yadav, H.; Jain, S. Advances in Bioactive Compounds from Plants and Their Applications in Alzheimer’s Disease. Biomolecules 2025, 16, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gayathri, S.; Raghu, C.H.; Fayaz, S. Phytotherapeutics against Alzheimer’s Disease: Mechanism, Molecular Targets and Challenges for Drug Development. CNS Neurol. Disord.-Drug Targets 2022, 21, 409–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Das, K.; Gezici, S. Review article Plant secondary metabolites, their separation, identification and role in human disease prevention. Ann. Phytomedicine Int. J. 2018, 7, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lahare, R.P.; Yadav, H.S.; Bisen, Y.K.; Dashahre, A.K. Estimation of Total Phenol, Flavonoid, Tannin and Alkaloid Content in Different Extracts of Catharanthus roseus from Durg District, Chhattisgarh, India. Sch. Bull. 2021, 7, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gul, R.; Jan, S.U.; Faridullah, S.; Sherani, S.; Jahan, N. Preliminary Phytochemical Screening, Quantitative Analysis of Alkaloids, and Antioxidant Activity of Crude Plant Extracts from Ephedra intermedia Indigenous to Balochistan. Sci. World J. 2017, 2017, 5873648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shah, P.; Modi, H.A. Comparative study of DPPH, ABTS and FRAP assays for determination of antioxidant activity. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2015, 3, 636–641. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. List of some plants and their phytoconstituents used in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease.
Table 1. List of some plants and their phytoconstituents used in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease.
Plant NameReported Mechanism Reference
Bacopa monnieriMemory enhancer; antioxidant, anti-amyloid effects[11]
Acorus calamusNeuroprotective; memory enhancer[7]
Cordia dichotomaCholinesterase inhibition; antioxidant effects[7]
Withania somniferaNeuroprotective; cholinesterase inhibition[12]
Ginkgo bilobaCognitive support; antioxidant and anti-inflammatory[13]
Panax ginsengAnti-amyloid, neurotrophic modulation[12]
Polygala tenuifoliaNeuroprotective; cognitive function improvement[14]
Crocus sativusAnti-amyloid, antioxidant[15]
Centella asiaticaNootropic; antioxidant[15]
Clitoria ternateaNeuroprotective; antioxidant[15]
Terminalia chebulaAntioxidant, possible anti-amyloid[15]
Asparagus racemosusCognitive support in models[15]
Salvia officinalisCognitive-enhancing effects[16]
Melissa officinalisAntioxidant & cholinergic modulation[16]
Camellia sinensisEGCG & polyphenols with neuroprotective roles[16]
Tinospora cordifoliaAnti-inflammatory/neuroprotective[17]
Convolvulus pluricaulisMemory enhancer; neuroprotective effects[17]
Table 2. Phytochemical screening of secondary metabolites of plant extracts using aerial plant extract and root plant extract.
Table 2. Phytochemical screening of secondary metabolites of plant extracts using aerial plant extract and root plant extract.
PhytochemicalsAerial ExtractRoot Extract
Alkaloids++
Flavonoids ++
Steroidal compounds+
Tannins ++
Cardiac glycosides ++
Saponins ++
Terpenoids ++
Table 3. ABTS radical scavenging activity of plant extracts.
Table 3. ABTS radical scavenging activity of plant extracts.
Concentration (mg/mL)ABTS % Inhibition—AerialABTS % Inhibition—RootABTS % Inhibition—Ascorbic Acid (Standard)
0.521.4 ± 1.232.6 ± 1.454.8 ± 1.6
1.029.8 ± 1.544.2 ± 1.766.3 ± 1.8
2.041.6 ± 1.858.9 ± 2.078.5 ± 2.1
3.052.3 ± 2.169.7 ± 2.386.9 ± 2.4
5.063.5 ± 2.481.2 ± 2.694.6 ± 2.8
Table 4. Ferric-Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) activity of plant extracts.
Table 4. Ferric-Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) activity of plant extracts.
Concentration (mg/mL)FRAP—Aerial (mg AAE/mL)FRAP—Root (mg AAE/mL)FRAP—Ascorbic Acid (mg AAE/mL)
0.50.42 ± 0.030.68 ± 0.041.15 ± 0.05
1.00.63 ± 0.040.95 ± 0.051.82 ± 0.06
2.00.94 ± 0.051.34 ± 0.062.63 ± 0.08
3.01.21 ± 0.061.76 ± 0.073.28 ± 0.09
5.01.58 ± 0.082.21 ± 0.094.10 ± 0.12
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Malik, R.; Singh, S.K.; Kumar, P. Phytochemical Screening and In Vitro Antioxidant Analysis of Colebrookea oppositifolia Sm. Extract. Eng. Proc. 2026, 124, 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026124030

AMA Style

Malik R, Singh SK, Kumar P. Phytochemical Screening and In Vitro Antioxidant Analysis of Colebrookea oppositifolia Sm. Extract. Engineering Proceedings. 2026; 124(1):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026124030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Malik, Rohit, Santosh Kumar Singh, and Prashant Kumar. 2026. "Phytochemical Screening and In Vitro Antioxidant Analysis of Colebrookea oppositifolia Sm. Extract" Engineering Proceedings 124, no. 1: 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026124030

APA Style

Malik, R., Singh, S. K., & Kumar, P. (2026). Phytochemical Screening and In Vitro Antioxidant Analysis of Colebrookea oppositifolia Sm. Extract. Engineering Proceedings, 124(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026124030

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop