Carbon capture is an essential technology for reducing industrial CO
2 emissions, particularly in the power and cement sectors. Among the various capture methods, solvent-based absorption systems are widely used due to their efficiency and scalability, making the selection of the right solvent
[...] Read more.
Carbon capture is an essential technology for reducing industrial CO
2 emissions, particularly in the power and cement sectors. Among the various capture methods, solvent-based absorption systems are widely used due to their efficiency and scalability, making the selection of the right solvent critical for near-term applications. This study analyzes several solvents for use in an absorption-based CO
2 capture system, emphasizing identifying the most suitable solvent for 2025–2030. The research methodology involves process modeling in Aspen Plus, sensitivity analysis, and evaluation of the regeneration duty for each solvent. The objective is to achieve at least 90% CO
2 capture and 95% CO
2 purity. The flue gas composition considered in this analysis is 19.8% CO
2, 9.3% O
2, 63% N
2, 7.5% H
2O, and other trace gases. Various solvents are evaluated to determine their effectiveness in capturing CO
2 while minimizing the energy consumption during solvent regeneration. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to optimize the system’s performance based on the solvent type, operating conditions, and regeneration duty. The results showed that amine blends demonstrated a CO
2 capture rate of 92% and a CO
2 purity of 96%, with regeneration energy requirements of around 3.2 GJ/ton of CO
2, significantly lower than those of traditional MEA systems, which typically require around 4.0 GJ/ton. In contrast, ionic liquids showed a CO
2 capture rate of 89% and a purity of 95%, with a regeneration energy of 2.8 GJ/ton, though their current cost is higher, limiting their immediate large-scale application. Annual capital expenditure (CAPEX) calculation revealed that amine blends could potentially reduce the CAPEX by 15–20% compared to MEA, while amino acid salts showed similar CAPEX reductions with a capture efficiency of 90%. Overall, the results indicate that hybrid amine solvents are the most cost-effective and practical solution for 2025–2030, with ionic liquids and amino acid salts emerging as promising alternatives as their costs decrease.
Full article