Next Article in Journal
Impact of Cathode Surface Area on Gas–Liquid Mass Transfer and Acetate Production Efficiency in H2-Mediated Microbial Electrosynthesis from CO2
Previous Article in Journal
Physical Characteristics of Hydride Perovskites XZrH3 (X = Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba) as Materials for Hydrogen Storage: A First-Principles Investigation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Packing Geometry and Polymer Material Effects on Sealing of a PN650 Hydrogen Service Needle Valve: Vacuum/Helium Leak Screening and 650 Bar Hydrogen Cycling

by
Enric Palau Forte
1,2 and
Francesc Medina Cabello
2,*
1
Redfluid, 08227 Terrassa, Spain
2
Chemical Engineering Department, Universitat Rovira I Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Hydrogen 2026, 7(1), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen7010041
Submission received: 16 February 2026 / Revised: 12 March 2026 / Accepted: 18 March 2026 / Published: 20 March 2026

Abstract

External leakage from valve stem packings is a critical safety and reliability issue in high-pressure hydrogen systems. This work aims to quantify how packing geometry and polymer selection influence stem sealing in a PN650 needle valve (316L body and stem). Two geometries were compared: a conical V-ring (chevron style) stack and a flat three-disc stack. Two polymer material sets were assessed: Vespel® polyimide (SP-1/SP-21) and a glass-filled PTFE sealing element combined with a virgin PEEK back-up ring. Four assemblies (one per geometry/material combination) were first screened by hydrostatic pressure hold testing up to 1500 bar and by helium mass spectrometer leak measurements under vacuum. All assemblies sustained the hydrostatic overpressure hold with negligible decay. Vacuum helium screening produced leak rates between 3.7 × 10−10 and 9.5 × 10−10 mbar·l·s−1, with the conical V-ring geometry consistently outperforming the disc stack. A more demanding helium test at 700 bar with external vacuum yielded leak rates of 3.6–3.7 × 10−8 mbar·l·s−1, for conical assemblies. Based on the screening results and practical industrial considerations, the PTFE/PEEK conical configuration was selected for endurance testing and completed 2500 open/close cycles in 650 bar hydrogen without gland readjustment. Post-cycling checks confirmed continued tightness, including a qualitative helium pressure hold result near 700 bar and 0 bubbles in 10 min in the seat tightness test. Microscopy/EDX revealed limited wear with minor metallic transfer. The proposed multi-stage workflow provides a pragmatic route for the early qualification of stem packings for high-pressure hydrogen valves.
Keywords: hydrogen infrastructure; needle valve; stem packing; fugitive emissions; helium leak test; vacuum leak rate; rPTFE; PEEK; Vespel; pressure cycling hydrogen infrastructure; needle valve; stem packing; fugitive emissions; helium leak test; vacuum leak rate; rPTFE; PEEK; Vespel; pressure cycling

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Forte, E.P.; Cabello, F.M. Packing Geometry and Polymer Material Effects on Sealing of a PN650 Hydrogen Service Needle Valve: Vacuum/Helium Leak Screening and 650 Bar Hydrogen Cycling. Hydrogen 2026, 7, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen7010041

AMA Style

Forte EP, Cabello FM. Packing Geometry and Polymer Material Effects on Sealing of a PN650 Hydrogen Service Needle Valve: Vacuum/Helium Leak Screening and 650 Bar Hydrogen Cycling. Hydrogen. 2026; 7(1):41. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen7010041

Chicago/Turabian Style

Forte, Enric Palau, and Francesc Medina Cabello. 2026. "Packing Geometry and Polymer Material Effects on Sealing of a PN650 Hydrogen Service Needle Valve: Vacuum/Helium Leak Screening and 650 Bar Hydrogen Cycling" Hydrogen 7, no. 1: 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen7010041

APA Style

Forte, E. P., & Cabello, F. M. (2026). Packing Geometry and Polymer Material Effects on Sealing of a PN650 Hydrogen Service Needle Valve: Vacuum/Helium Leak Screening and 650 Bar Hydrogen Cycling. Hydrogen, 7(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen7010041

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop