Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Water Quality Through Integrated Reverse Osmosis and UV Disinfection: Optimization Using an Intelligent Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
Multiscale Correlation of Coal Mine Dust Physicochemical Properties and Wettability in Fully Mechanized Mining Faces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Integrated Qualification Workflow for AISI 316 and 304L Stainless Steels Using Destructive and Eddy Current Non-Destructive Testing

1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VSB Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 15, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic
2
Faculty of Materials Science and Technology, VSB Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 15, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic
3
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zilina, 17. Univerzitna 8215/1, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Eng 2026, 7(5), 247; https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7050247
Submission received: 31 March 2026 / Revised: 11 May 2026 / Accepted: 14 May 2026 / Published: 18 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Materials Engineering)

Abstract

This study establishes an integrated qualification workflow combining mechanical testing, microstructural characterization, and statistically defined eddy current testing (ECT) on the same material heats to provide a coherent and traceable material qualification methodology. Forged 316 and rolled 304L were fully annealed and subsequently subjected to a 700 °C/1 h low-temperature stress-relief (recovery) treatment. Room-temperature tensile testing and Charpy impact testing at room and cryogenic temperatures were performed alongside optical and electron microscopy to quantify grain size, δ-ferrite content, and representative fracture morphology under the investigated conditions. ECT responses were evaluated using a statistically defined threshold (T = μ + ) as a decision criterion for indication screening under assumed noise conditions and calibrated near-surface inspection sensitivity. The tested specimens showed stable measured mechanical responses, the examined fracture surfaces were consistent with predominantly ductile fracture behavior, and no reportable ECT indications were observed above the adopted threshold. The proposed framework provides a reproducible and scalable strategy for reducing uncertainty in material qualification and strengthening integration between destructive and non-destructive evaluation in stainless steel applications.
Keywords: austenitic stainless-steel qualification; destructive testing correlation; eddy current inspection; microstructure–property relationship; ECT-based indication screening austenitic stainless-steel qualification; destructive testing correlation; eddy current inspection; microstructure–property relationship; ECT-based indication screening

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Emele, J.; Sliva, A.; Nainaragaram Ramasamy, M.; Brozova, S.; Dižo, J. Integrated Qualification Workflow for AISI 316 and 304L Stainless Steels Using Destructive and Eddy Current Non-Destructive Testing. Eng 2026, 7, 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7050247

AMA Style

Emele J, Sliva A, Nainaragaram Ramasamy M, Brozova S, Dižo J. Integrated Qualification Workflow for AISI 316 and 304L Stainless Steels Using Destructive and Eddy Current Non-Destructive Testing. Eng. 2026; 7(5):247. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7050247

Chicago/Turabian Style

Emele, Jude, Ales Sliva, Mahalingam Nainaragaram Ramasamy, Silvie Brozova, and Ján Dižo. 2026. "Integrated Qualification Workflow for AISI 316 and 304L Stainless Steels Using Destructive and Eddy Current Non-Destructive Testing" Eng 7, no. 5: 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7050247

APA Style

Emele, J., Sliva, A., Nainaragaram Ramasamy, M., Brozova, S., & Dižo, J. (2026). Integrated Qualification Workflow for AISI 316 and 304L Stainless Steels Using Destructive and Eddy Current Non-Destructive Testing. Eng, 7(5), 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7050247

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop