Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Cavity Reservoirs Based on a Shape-Constrained Multi-Trace Seismic Inversion Method
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Insights into the Mechanisms of Drag Reduction and Flow Stabilisation in Horizontal Gas–Liquid Pipeline Flow Using Sodium Lauryl Sulphate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Prototyping a Compact Moisture Profiling Probe for Detecting and Zoning Hidden Subsurface Waterlogging

by
Assel Mukhamejanova
1,
Matija Orešković
2,
Yelbek Utepov
1,*,
Farit Abdushkurov
3 and
Dias Kazhimkanuly
1,*
1
Department of Civil Engineering, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010008, Kazakhstan
2
Department of Civil Engineering, University North, 42000 Varaždin, Croatia
3
Technobius LLP, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Eng 2026, 7(5), 221; https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7050221
Submission received: 7 April 2026 / Revised: 30 April 2026 / Accepted: 2 May 2026 / Published: 6 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical, Civil and Environmental Engineering)

Abstract

Hidden waterlogging of subsurface soils may develop without clear external signs, while still deteriorating the hydro-physical state of foundation soils. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates a compact monitoring and interpretation workflow for identifying such zones through moisture profiling and subsequent engineering interpretation using the liquidity index (IL) for cohesive soils and the saturation ratio (Sr) for non-cohesive soils. The developed prototype comprises a modular immersion probe, Arduino-based transmitter and receiver units, 433 MHz ASK wireless communication, and data logging. Using geotechnical survey data from a representative site in Astana, a baseline hydro-physical state and an intentionally constructed synthetic risk-waterlogging scenario were analyzed through vertical profiles and horizontal interpolation maps. Under the baseline state, moisture content varied mainly from about 6 to 23%, while most IL and Sr values remained within the normal zone. In the synthetic scenario, the response was much stronger in cohesive soils, where IL increased from about −0.55 to 1.8, whereas Sr in non-cohesive soils changed only slightly. The Welch’s t-test indicated significant scenario-related changes for IL (p-value of 1.095 × 10−19) but not for Sr (p-value of 0.147). The results show the methodological potential of the proposed workflow for engineeringly interpretable zoning of hidden waterlogging; however, site-specific calibration, metrological characterization, and field validation are still required before practical deployment.
Keywords: hidden waterlogging; moisture profiling; subsurface zoning; electrical resistivity; geotechnical monitoring hidden waterlogging; moisture profiling; subsurface zoning; electrical resistivity; geotechnical monitoring

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mukhamejanova, A.; Orešković, M.; Utepov, Y.; Abdushkurov, F.; Kazhimkanuly, D. Prototyping a Compact Moisture Profiling Probe for Detecting and Zoning Hidden Subsurface Waterlogging. Eng 2026, 7, 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7050221

AMA Style

Mukhamejanova A, Orešković M, Utepov Y, Abdushkurov F, Kazhimkanuly D. Prototyping a Compact Moisture Profiling Probe for Detecting and Zoning Hidden Subsurface Waterlogging. Eng. 2026; 7(5):221. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7050221

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mukhamejanova, Assel, Matija Orešković, Yelbek Utepov, Farit Abdushkurov, and Dias Kazhimkanuly. 2026. "Prototyping a Compact Moisture Profiling Probe for Detecting and Zoning Hidden Subsurface Waterlogging" Eng 7, no. 5: 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7050221

APA Style

Mukhamejanova, A., Orešković, M., Utepov, Y., Abdushkurov, F., & Kazhimkanuly, D. (2026). Prototyping a Compact Moisture Profiling Probe for Detecting and Zoning Hidden Subsurface Waterlogging. Eng, 7(5), 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7050221

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop