Next Article in Journal
Next-Generation Automated Adaptive Protection Enabled by Geospatial Load Forecasting in Distribution Networks
Previous Article in Journal
On the Sensitivity of Characteristic Transfer Functions of Multivariable Control Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Systematic Review

Safety-Oriented Model Predictive Control for Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Review

by
Ali Mahmood
1,2,* and
Róbert Szabolcsi
3
1
Doctoral School on Safety and Security Sciences, Obuda University, 1081 Budapest, Hungary
2
Systems and Control Engineering Department, Ninevah University, Mosul 41002, Iraq
3
Kandó Kálmán Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Obuda University, 1084 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Automation 2026, 7(3), 88; https://doi.org/10.3390/automation7030088 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 9 April 2026 / Revised: 1 June 2026 / Accepted: 6 June 2026 / Published: 9 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Smart Transportation and Autonomous Vehicles)

Abstract

Ensuring safety in autonomous vehicles (AVs) requires predictive control methods that can handle dynamic constraints, uncertain interactions, and real-time decision making. This review examines safety-oriented model predictive control (MPC) for AVs using a PRISMA-guided screening process. From 363 records published between January 2015 and March 2026, 101 peer-reviewed studies were selected for qualitative synthesis. The literature is organized into three domains: collision avoidance and risk mitigation, trajectory tracking and path following, and intersection and coordination tasks. Across these domains, MPC has evolved from nominal tracking and geometric avoidance toward risk-aware, robust, hierarchical, and learning-enhanced formulations. Unlike broader reviews on autonomous driving control, this review focuses specifically on safety-oriented MPC and compares the reviewed literature in terms of safety mechanisms, uncertainty treatment, validation practice, computational feasibility, and deployment limitations. The review shows that MPC remains one of the most versatile frameworks for AV safety, but the evidence base is weakened by heavy reliance on simulation, inconsistent safety metrics, limited validation under uncertainty, and uneven treatment of computational feasibility. The most promising directions are hybrid architectures that combine model-based safety guarantees with uncertainty-aware prediction, learning-assisted adaptation, and scalable coordination mechanisms.
Keywords: predictive safety control; collision avoidance; trajectory tracking; cooperative driving; uncertainty-aware control; autonomous navigation predictive safety control; collision avoidance; trajectory tracking; cooperative driving; uncertainty-aware control; autonomous navigation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mahmood, A.; Szabolcsi, R. Safety-Oriented Model Predictive Control for Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Review. Automation 2026, 7, 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/automation7030088

AMA Style

Mahmood A, Szabolcsi R. Safety-Oriented Model Predictive Control for Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Review. Automation. 2026; 7(3):88. https://doi.org/10.3390/automation7030088

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mahmood, Ali, and Róbert Szabolcsi. 2026. "Safety-Oriented Model Predictive Control for Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Review" Automation 7, no. 3: 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/automation7030088

APA Style

Mahmood, A., & Szabolcsi, R. (2026). Safety-Oriented Model Predictive Control for Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Review. Automation, 7(3), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/automation7030088

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop