Next Article in Journal
Application of Peptide-Conjugated Photosensitizers for Photodynamic Cancer Therapy: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Isoxazol-5-One Derivatives Catalyzed by Amine-Functionalized Cellulose
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Aldehydes: What We Should Know About Them

by
Alessia Catalano
1,*,
Annaluisa Mariconda
2,
Assunta D’Amato
3,
Domenico Iacopetta
4,
Jessica Ceramella
4,
Maria Marra
4,
Carmela Saturnino
5,
Maria Stefania Sinicropi
4 and
Pasquale Longo
3
1
Department of Pharmacy-Drug Sciences, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Via Orabona, 4, 70126 Bari, Italy
2
Department of Basic and Applied Sciences, University of Basilicata, Via dell’Ateneo Lucano, 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy
3
Department of Chemistry and Biology “A. Zambelli”, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
4
Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende, Italy
5
Department of Health Sciences, University of Basilicata, Via dell’Ateneo Lucano, 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Organics 2024, 5(4), 395-428; https://doi.org/10.3390/org5040021
Submission received: 26 August 2024 / Revised: 15 October 2024 / Accepted: 17 October 2024 / Published: 21 October 2024

Abstract

:
From Egyptian mummies to the Chanel N° 5 perfume, aldehydes have been used for a long time and continue to impact our senses in a wide range of perfumes, foods, and beverages. Aldehydes represent one of the categories of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which are categorized as chemicals with boiling points up to 260 °C and can be found in indoor environments in the gaseous phase. Because of their potential or known hazardous properties for humans, the World Health Organization (WHO)-Europe provided some guidelines that may prevent several health risks. Indeed, some aldehydes, reported to be risky for humans, have been retired from the market, such as butylphenyl methylpropional (BMHCA). The purpose of this review is to summarize the most important aldehydes found indoors and outdoors and analyse in depth the toxicological aspects of these compounds, whose presence in perfumes is often underestimated. In addition, the ingredients’ synonyms that are reported in the literature for the same compound were unified in order to simplify their identification.

1. Introduction

Flavours and fragrance chemicals are agents that may promptly stimulate the gustatory and olfactory receptors in the mouth and nose. They belong to the VOCs, among which aldehydes represent a particular group of potentially reactive organic compounds, due to the polarized carbon–oxygen double bond present in their structure [1], and include fatty aldehydes, such as hexanal, decanal, and octanal, with fresh apple, orange peel, and citrus odours, respectively, while aromatic aldehydes include benzaldehyde, with cinnamon and almond odours. Furthermore, notorious terpenoid aldehydes comprise safranal and citral, which give saffron and lemon aromas, respectively [2]. Several aldehydes are common and of potential concern in indoor residential and occupational environments; they are precursors of particulate matter and ozone formation in outdoor air [3]. Because of their reactivity, they can interact with electron-rich biological macromolecules, producing adverse effects for health, such as allergenic reactions, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity [4]. Thus, due to the numerous critical issues that arise for aldehydes, several methods have been reported in the last years for their detection, especially for the highly volatile aliphatic aldehydes, such as formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and furfural [5,6]. On the other hand, many aldehydes present in different types of essential oils have been demonstrated to possess interesting biological activities, for instance, reducing the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to act as antimicrobial agents, balancing menstrual cycles, being efficient as an immune system booster [7], and possessing tonic, antipyretic, spasmolytic, calming, vasodilator, and antiviral activities [8]. An overview of aldehyde-forming reactions in biological systems and beyond has been recently reported [9]. Moreover straight-chain aliphatic aldehydes have often been found in the breath of patients suffering from lung diseases, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), suggesting their use as biomarkers for these diseases [10,11,12]. Nevertheless, notwithstanding the important role of aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs) in the detoxification of aldehydes [13], studies regarding the toxicity of these compounds and restrictions of aldehydes in cosmetics are increasing. Recently, 2-(4-tert-butylbenzyl)propionaldehyde (BMHCA), which has been recognized as a potential threat for humans, is actually submitted to restrictions in Europe due to its potential toxicity. Moreover, it must be considered that often aldehydes are present in topically applied medical devices, in the form of gels and creams, which can be applied to damaged skin. However, unlike cosmetics, these products are not subject to restrictions when used in medical devices [14]. In this review, we summarize the most common VOCs, specifically aldehydes, both aliphatic and aromatic, present in PPCPs and in foods, focusing on the recent studies about their potential toxicity and threat for humans (Figure 1). Moreover, given that each aldehyde often has multiple names, they have been catalogued in paragraphs and tables, reporting all the names attributed to each single compound.

2. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)

Flavours and fragrances belong to the VOCs, which are categorized by the World Health Organization (WHO) as compounds with a boiling point of 50–250 °C at atmospheric pressure [15,16]; thus, they can be found indoors in the gaseous phase. They can be found in personal care products (PCPs), also defined as personal care and household products (PCHPs), which include perfumes, creams, lotions, detergents, and so on, as well as in food and in pharmaceuticals, to ameliorate or modify their odour and/or taste [17]. Electrophysiological studies showed that diverse fragrances affect brain activities and cognitive functions, with changes in the electroencephalogram [18]. The number of flavouring compounds utilized in daily products is very large, just considering that the list of Scientific Committee on Cosmetic and Non-Food Products (SCCNFP) contains 2750 entries as perfume and aromatic raw materials (SCCNFP, 2000) [19,20]. In order to establish the fragrances that may be safely used in foodstuffs, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) reported a list of compounds for which additional toxicity data have to be provided on the Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) Panel [21]. VOCs include acids, alcohols, esters, and aldehydes, and they may be natural, such as those present in virgin olive oil, coffee, fruit, rice, and plants [22,23,24,25], or may derive from anthropogenic sources [26], including solvents, printing ink [27], PCPs, solvents, coating, pesticides [28,29,30], and deodorizers [31]. Domestic cooking is also an important source of VOCs [32]. Among the different categories of compounds found in indoor environments, VOCs can frequently reach higher concentrations compared to the corresponding outdoor values. Long-term exposure to VOCs may impact human health with negative cutaneous, respiratory, and systemic effects (e.g., headache, asthma attacks, breathing difficulties, and cardiovascular and neurological issues) and cause distress in workplaces; they may increase the risk of lung cancer, sick building syndrome, and other building-related illness [33,34,35]. The main point is that these “reactive” anthropogenic VOCs may produce secondary organic aerosols via photochemical reactions, leading to atmospheric pollution and adverse side effects in sensitive populations [36,37,38]. Additionally, several VOC degradation technologic procedures have been described [39].

3. Aldehydes

Aldehydes are carbonyl compounds found in nature with high reactivity, undergoing common reactions such as oxidation, reduction, and condensation [40,41,42]. Aldehydes are widely distributed indoors and outdoors, deriving from industrial, restaurant, and automotive waste, and are believed to be an important cause contributing to smog in the air. Some examples of famous perfumes that contain aldehydes are Chanel N°. 5, Lancôme Climat, Givenchy L’interdit, and D&G Sicily. It was Chanel N° 5 that popularized the usage of aldehydes in perfumes [43,44]. Aldehydes may also be found in rainwater and surface water, because of their leaching from the atmosphere and their high water solubility. Furthermore, the microbial or photochemical degradation of organic chemicals, as well as sterilization with chlorination and ozonation of drinking water, leads to the formation of aldehydes in surface waters. Finally, aldehydes may derive from high-temperature cooking or frying and also from cigarette smoke and/or other combustion activities [3,45,46,47]. Generally, the aldehyde content rises with an increase in temperature and/or time during the roasting process [48]. A recent study evidenced that air frying, which is becoming a popular method for domestic cooking, leads to the production of an amount of VOCs generally higher compared with conventional cooking with a pan [49]. Aldehydes may be found in wine and vegetal oil and may also represent by-products during the spoilage, maturation, or microbial fermentation of foods [50,51]. The “volatolome”, consisting of VOCs emanated from the human body, was reported in 2014 for the first time [52]. Aldehydes have demonstrated various biological activities, such as antimicrobial, both as free compounds or complexed with metals [53], and this is useful in extending the shelf life of vegetables and fruit [54]. Moreover, the antioxidant activity of aldehyde Schiff bases [55,56] and their use in the catalysis of α-branched aldehydes have also been reported [57,58]. However, human exposure to aldehydes from food or from the environment can lead to some adverse health effects, both acute and chronic. Since the 1960s, formaldehyde, acrolein, crotonaldehyde, acetaldehyde, i-butanal, and n-butanal have been reported to exhibit toxicity [59]. The potential high toxicity of aldehydes is related to their high reactivity with biological molecules, which may lead to the disruption of biological activities, thus causing various disorders and diseases [60], such as allergies, hepatotoxicity, pulmonary toxicity, embryo toxicity, diabetes, hypertension, cerebral ischemia, cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and other ageing-associated diseases [61,62]. Since inhalation is an important route of aldehyde exposure, the lung and heart are two of the major targets of aldehyde toxicity [63,64]. Recent studies have addressed the synthesis of aldehydes for flavours and the fragrance industry, focusing on new investigations to encourage the sustainable development of biotechnological solutions via the biocatalytic oxidation of alcohols and using photocatalytic strategies for the installation of the formyl group, in order to obtain so-called ‘bio-aldehydes’ [65,66,67,68]. Moreover, engineering microbial biosynthesis methods for the preparation of these compounds have been described [69].

4. Aliphatic Aldehydes

Aliphatic aldehydes are degradation products formed during the heat-induced oxidation of fatty acids, especially unsaturated fatty acids. They have intrinsic flavours and include saturated aldehydes, such as hexanal, heptanal, and decanal; monounsaturated aldehydes, such as hexenal, heptenal, and decenal; and three polyunsaturated aldehydes (2,4-hexadienal, 2,4-heptadienal, and 2,4-decadienal) [70]. Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde provide a key benchmark of the fuel ignition phenomena [71]. Several aliphatic aldehydes belonging to VOCs, such as acetaldehyde, butanal, 3-methylbutanal, pentanal, hexanal, octanal, nonanal, and decanal, have been identified by Head Space-Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (HS-GC/MS) in the PET bottles used for the packaging of six Italian brands of mineral water. Acetaldehyde, octanal, nonanal, and decanal were the most abundant compounds identified in the packaging and in the contained mineral water. These aldehydes are likely derived from epoxidized soybean oil or erucamide used as additives and are probably loaded during the blow-moulding processes used for PET bottle manufacturing [72]. A recent study conducted on chicken meat to identify the substances responsible for the characteristic aroma revealed that hexanal, (E)-2-nonenal, heptanal, and (E,E)-2,4-decadienal were breed-specific aroma compounds present in native Chinese chickens but not in the meat of white-feathered broilers [73]. The emissions of aliphatic aldehydes, such as formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acrolein as gas-phase air toxics produced by gasoline and diesel vehicles, are tracked by the EPA and California Air Resources Board (CARB) for monitoring air quality [74]. Some methods for their detection have been reported [75,76,77]. In addition, ozone reactions with carpet may lead to higher concentrations of aliphatic aldehydes, such as formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and aldehydes with 5–10 carbons, leading to secondary emissions [31]. Formaldehyde (Group 1), acrolein (Group 2A), acetaldehyde, and crotonaldehyde (Group 2B) have been identified in tobacco smoke and are classified by the IARC as carcinogens. The formation of these compounds is mainly due to tobacco combustion and pyrolysis, since these compounds are poorly detected in unburnt tobacco [78]. In order to update the safety assessment process conducted by the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. (RIFM), revised criteria were designed and published [79]. Aldehydes with 8–18 carbon atoms are most commonly used in formulating modern perfumes [44]. The implementation of REACH (the European Regulation on Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals) added new data for chemicals including fragrance materials such as aldehydes [80]. The most common aliphatic aldehydes are summarized in Table 1.

4.1. Formaldehyde (Methanal)

Formaldehyde (or methanal) is a colourless, flammable, pungent-smelling, and highly reactive chemical that is recognized as a xenobiotic air pollutant and is universally distributed to humans [81,82]. Liquid formaldehyde, called formalin, which is widely used in anatomy laboratories to preserve cadavers, is an aqueous solution of formaldehyde (37%), normally with the addition of about 15% methanol to prevent polymerization. As the simplest aldehyde, it is synthesized by the catalytic oxidation of methanol. It is one of the major pollutants in indoor environments and is toxic, allergenic, and potentially carcinogenic to the human body. It may derive from smoking, cooking, heating, wood-based furniture, paints and textiles, building materials, decoration materials, furniture finishings, household products, cosmetics, plastics, medicines, and chemical reactions between VOCs and ozone [83]. It may also derive from the residues of food including fruits, vegetables, and meat, and can be generated in living organisms [84]. Formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded techniques are widely used for tissue preservation in hospitals, brain banks, and research laboratories, allowing neuropathological evaluations of the human post-mortem brain. However, the formaldehyde-fixed tissues have diverse crosslinks between macromolecules, and Schiff base formation between proteins and formaldehyde may be observed [85]. Short-term exposure to formaldehyde may cause many symptoms, such as burning sensations in the nose, eyes and throat; coughing; wheezing; nausea; and skin irritation, whereas long-term exposure can lead to the onset of cancer [86]. Indeed, formaldehyde was identified as a Class 1 human carcinogen by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2004 [87] and by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in 2006, because there was sufficient evidence for it being a human cancer-causing agent (carcinogen), based on the results of epidemiological studies assessing an association with nasopharyngeal cancer in humans and squamous cell carcinomas in the nasal passages of rats. The IARC concluded that there was “strong but not sufficient evidence for a causal association between leukaemia and occupational exposure to formaldehyde” [88,89]. In 2014, formaldehyde was classified as a 1B carcinogen and mutagen by the European Commission [90]. In addition to the well-established risk to human health from formaldehyde environmental exposure, recent reports indicate that endogenously produced formaldehyde also represents a significant threat [91]. The mutagenic activity of formaldehyde is attributed to the electrophilic carbon, which may rapidly attack electron-rich thiols, as well as amino groups, forming covalent bonds [92]. Effectively, research conducted in an anatomy laboratory showed that cancer risk assessment for employees exposed to formaldehyde was several thousand times higher than the limit recommended by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (10−6) [93]. Kang et al. (2021) [94] analysed the potential association between formaldehyde exposure and leukaemia by exploring biological networks basing on formaldehyde-related genes retrieved from public and commercial databases. The authors found that oxidative stress-mediated genetic changes induced by formaldehyde might disturb the haematopoietic system, possibly resulting in leukaemia [94]. Moreover, formaldehyde exposure may be related to arthritis [95]. A recent review summarizes the in vitro and in vivo studies assessing the toxicity of formaldehyde [96]; however, the toxicity aspects for this chemical are controversial, and the causal relationship remains unclear because of the limited evidence demonstrating the effects of formaldehyde on the bone marrow and other distal organs [97]. In contrast, some toxicological and modelling studies indicated that formaldehyde does not reach regions far away from the primary exposure site and should not be expected to induce cancer, or any other endpoints, in these tissues [98]. Stringent formaldehyde exposure guidelines exist for indoor air (WHO Indoor Air Quality-IAQ-regulation established an upper limit of 80–100 ppb [99,100], or 100 µg/m3 [101] for exposure within a short period of 30 min), which can be even lower at the national level in France (e.g., France 8 ppb by 2023) [102]. The olfactory limit of human beings for formaldehyde (410 ppb) [103] is far higher than the safety standard, making it difficult to avoid the harm caused by formaldehyde through our own olfactory system. In this context, the use of several sensors for selective formaldehyde detection at ppb levels has been reported [104,105]. A systematic review on exposure and early effect biomarkers for the risk assessment of occupational exposure to formaldehyde has been recently reported [106].

4.2. Acetaldehyde (Ethanal)

Acetaldehyde (or ethanal) is a simple aldehyde widely found in nature and produced on a large scale in industry; it is abundant in automobile exhaust and human daily necessities, which leads to water and environmental pollution. It contributes to the odour and tactile nasal perception of red wine [107] and is also used as an intermediate in organic syntheses. Acetaldehyde is a side product of cell metabolism, as it can react with genomic DNA to induce cell poisoning, causing major damage to the human body [77]. The inhalation of exogenous acetaldehyde may cause bronchitis, upper respiratory disease, denaturation, and/or death of proteins. Moreover, acetaldehyde is involved in the pathological physiological processes related to alcohol addiction of aldehyde-metabolized organisms [108]. Acute exposure to acetaldehyde has irritating effects on the eyes, skin, and respiratory tract, whereas the symptoms of chronic acetaldehyde poisoning are comparable to those of alcoholism [109,110].

4.3. n-Butanal (n-Butyraldehyde) and 2-Methylpropanal (Iso-Butyraldehyde or Iso-Butanal)

Several studies have addressed normal-butanal (n-butanal or n-butyraldehyde) and iso-butanal (i-butanal or i-butyraldehyde or 2-methylpropanal) in interstellar chemistry by the astrophysical community, as they have been identified in several chondritic meteorites as targets for interstellar detection [111]. N-Butanal is used in perfumery, pharmaceuticals, rubber accelerators, agrochemicals, and textile auxiliaries and can be easily prepared through the hydroformylation of propene and dehydrogenation from naturally obtained n-butanol by the use of copper nanoparticles on a silica support [112].

4.4. 2-Methylbutanal and 3-Methylbutanal (or Isovaleraldehyde)

2-Methylbutanal has a cocoa and almond aroma, while 3-methylbutanal has a malt aroma. These compounds contribute to the deep-fried flavour in more than 50% of fried products [113], they may also derive from cooking microwave popcorn [114] and are present in black tea [115]. 3-Methylbutanal and other branched-chain aldehydes are common volatile compounds in several cheeses [116]. 3-Methylbutanal is produced by the action of the microbiota in cheese starters [117], but it is also present in Chinese fried food of youtiao [118]. 2-Methylbutanal and 3-methylbutanal, as well as 2-methylpropanal, are also produced during the manufacture of Raclette-type cheese [119].

4.5. Pentanal (Valeraldeheyde)

Pentanal (or valeraldehyde) has a pungent and fruity odour that gives the classical aroma to chicken broth [120]. It has demonstrated excellent inhibition activity against Aspergillus flavus on both potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates and red pepper powder, thus being suggested as a promising bio-preservative able to prevent A. flavus contamination of red pepper [121]. It can be formed during the oxidation of n-6 PUFAs [122] and may exhibit pulmonary toxicity, affect sensory organ development, induce apoptosis, and alter reproductive developmental processes [123]. It has been demonstrated that the emission profile of pentanal and hexanal depends on the frying temperature: with an increase in temperature, a rapid release of these compounds can be observed in the first minutes of frying, as demonstrated in a recent study during the deep-frying of tubers [124]. The monitoring of exhaled pentanal in the breath of ventilated patients has been suggested as a potential non-invasive biomarker for lipid peroxidation-inducing disease for the detection of lung injury [125].

4.6. Hexanal (Caproaldehyde, Caproic Aldehyde, Capraldehyde, Capronaldehyde)

Hexanal (or caproaldehyde or caproic aldehyde or capraldehyde or capronaldehyde) is a crucial component of the scent of mulberry [126]. It is a biomolecule derived from plants that is characterized by a fatty-green pungent odour and taste, and in low concentrations, it is reminiscent of unripe fruit. In particular, it has a grass, green, tallow, fat, leafy, vegetable, fruity, clean, woody aroma; indeed, it is a main component of the emissions from stored wood pellets and is often found in living environments, office furniture, and millwork [127]. It occurs in apple [128], grape [129], carrot, and strawberry [130] aromas, as well as in orange and lemon oil [131], and it is also present in non-psilocybin and psilocybin mushrooms [132,133]. Hexanal has a grass, green, flower odour, and it is used for fruit flavours and, when very diluted, in perfumery to obtain fruity notes. It has been demonstrated that it is able to inhibit phospholipase D and decrease the deterioration of membranes in fruits. Occupational exposure routes for hexanal consist of inhalation, dermal contact, and food intake. Hexanal preharvest applications, generally as sprays, and postharvest applications have been used to improve the shelf life and delay senescence of fruits and vegetables [134,135,136,137]. The vapour of hexanal is an easy and cheap strategy to extend the shelf life of fruit [138,139]. However, adverse effects on human health have been documented, including pulmonary toxic effects evidenced in rats. It may exhibit pulmonary toxicity and affect the G-protein coupled receptor protein signalling pathway and induce the acute inflammatory response [140]. The study by Corradi et al. [141] evidenced that the levels of hexanal detected in patients with COPD is higher than those of smoking and nonsmoking control subjects. The use of hexanal as a cancer biomarker has been suggested since high levels of this aldehyde were detected in the breath of patients with lung cancer [142,143]. Finally, it should be evidenced that, sometimes, there is confusion about the name of aldehydes, and hexanal and capraldehyde are considered different compounds [144,145].

4.7. Heptanal (Enanthaldehyde)

Heptanal (or enanthaldehyde) has a fat, citrus, fruity, waxy, and rancid aroma. It was identified as a main component of several essential oils from Aristolochia delavayi, Bupleurum longiradiatum, Kundmannia anatolica, Kundmannia syriaca, and extracts from cyanobacteria and green algae. In addition, it is the main chemical component of cereal volatiles of postharvest grains [146,147]. Furthermore, it was found in solvent extracts of Serapias orientalis subsp. orientalis plants in 10.4% concentration, along with pelargonaldehyde (7%) and hexanal (2.1%) [148]. Heptanal has been recently suggested as a fast and non-invasive way to monitor the spread of COVID-19 [149], being identified as a key biomarker that was significantly elevated in the exhaled breath of SARS-CoV-2 patients [150]. In addition, the use of potential biomarkers containing hexanal and heptanal has been described for lung cancer [151], also in the saliva of patients [152]. Recently, the activity of heptanal as an antifungal against A. flavus was reported. The safety of heptanal was authorized by the Flavor Extract Manufacturers’ Association [153].

4.8. Octanal (Caprylaldehyde)

Octanal is widespread distributed in the environment and represents an indoor air pollutant. Octanal has fat, soap, lemon, and green aromas possessing an odour threshold of only 0.01 mg/L. It occurs in several citrus oils, e.g., orange oil. It is a colourless liquid with a pungent odour (citrus, orange) and, on dilution, gives a citrus-like aroma. Octanal is used in low concentrations in perfumery, in eau de cologne, and in artificial citrus oils [154]. It is a bioactive component of Houttuynia cordata, which is studied for its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral properties against HIV and HSV, by blocking viral binding and the penetration of the viruses [155]. In addition, octanal was found to exert fungicidal activity against Geotrichum citri-aurantii in vitro, indicating effectiveness in controlling citrus postharvest pathogens [156]. Octanal has been demonstrated to be efficient in controlling green mould caused by Penicillium digitatum, thanks to a defence response mechanism; thus, it was suggested as an effective strategy for the control of postharvest green mould by triggering the defence response in citrus fruit [157]. It has been suggested that inflammation may contribute to octanal-induced lung damage, as octanal exposure is able to modulate the expression of several chemokines and inflammatory cytokines and enhances the levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and IL-8 release, which are involved in the development of lung injury [158].

4.9. Nonanal (Pelargonaldehyde)

Nonanal (or pelargonaldehyde) has a grassy, green, fat, citrus, floral, rose-like, waxy and fruity, pungent odour with a threshold of just 0.02 mg/L [159,160]. It is a clear brown liquid that is insoluble in water [44], and when employed at high levels, it is a significant part of citrus and rose notes. It occurs in citrus and rose oils and is used in floral compositions, especially those with rose characteristics. It has been reported as the key flavour substance, contributing to the intense grass-like aroma note, and the oily aroma of chicken soup [120,161,162].

4.10. Decanal (Caprinaldehyde)

Decanal (or caprinaldehyde) has a sweet, aldehydic, waxy, orange peel, citrus, floral aroma and is an ingredient of several essential oils (e.g., neroli oil). It is a colourless liquid with a strong odour, reminiscent of orange peel, which upon dilution, changes to a fresh citrus odour. Decanal is used in low concentrations in blossom fragrances (particularly for creating citrus nuances) and in the production of artificial citrus oils [44,163].

4.11. Undecanal

The 11-carbon undecanal is a unique compound that conveys a bitter and fresh effect in cologne formulas [44]. It is present in citrus oils. It is a colourless liquid with a flowery-waxy odour, which gives the sensation of freshness. Undecanal is defined as the prototype of the perfumery aldehydes and is broadly used in perfume compositions to give an aldehydic note.

4.12. Dodecanal (or Lauraldehyde or Lauric Aldehyde)

It is a colourless liquid with a waxy odour, present in many fragrances because of its intensity, and it has different qualities depending on the use [44]. At high dilutions, it is reminiscent of violets. Dodecanal occurs in various citrus oils and in small amounts in essential oils from several Pinus species. It is used in perfumery to confer fragrances with fatty-waxy notes. It is used to obtain citrus notes.

4.13. Tridecanal

It occurs in lemon oil and has been recognized as a volatile component of cucumber. It smells like grapefruit (citrusy smell) and can even enhance the smell of musk in a scent. It is a colourless liquid having a fatty-waxy, slightly citrus-like odour. Adding tridecanal to fragrance compositions imparts fresh nuances in the top note, as well as in the dry out [44]. Tridecanal is the aroma-characteristic compound of Hyuganatsu oil [164].

4.14. Tetradecanal (or Myristyl Aldehyde)

Tetradecanal or mirystyl aldehyde is an amalgam of peach aldehyde. It falls under the category of lactone (an organic compound that contains an ester) [165]. The odour profile is sweet and fruity (peachy), and even if used in small amounts, it is a potent compound [44,166]. This aldehyde is studied in orchids, as it plays a key role in the attraction of a wide variety of pollinator insects [167].

4.15. Hexadecanal

Hexadecanal is quite reminiscent of sweet candy and is also called strawberry aldehyde. Along with a strong fruity tone, this compound has a secondary hint of floral honey, making it very good for floral formulations [44]. Hexadecanal is a human body volatile that functions as a mammalian-wide social chemosignal that affects human aggression; thus, it has been suggested as a human signalling pheromone. It has been evidenced that sniffing hexadecanal blocks aggression in men and triggers aggression in women [168].

4.16. Acrolein (or Propenal)

Acrolein is a highly reactive unsaturated aliphatic aldehyde ubiquitously found as a common dietary and environmental pollutant, which seriously threatens human health and life. Acrolein is present in all kinds of foods, and dietary intake is one of the major routes of human exposure to this compound [169], but it can also be generated endogenously. Acrolein formed by lipid oxidation in a fried system with less sugar can form acrylamide and is classified as Group 2A by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [170] by the amino dehydroxylation reaction in the presence of ammonia [171,172]. Given its high reactivity, cytotoxicity, and genotoxicity, exposure to acrolein has been related to several diseases, including atherosclerosis, hepatic ischemia, diabetes mellitus, stroke, neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, asthma, acute lung injury, COPD, and even lung diseases and respiratory cancers [173,174,175,176]. At the cellular level, acrolein induces diverse harmful effects, such as protein adduction and oxidative damages [177]. Thus, the use of acrolein scavengers in food is being investigated to improve patient symptoms in neurodegenerative diseases in the long term [178]. Traditional tobacco smokers and e-cigarette users undergo the harmful effects of acrolein [179], and high concentrations of acrolein were found in mainstream and side-stream tobacco smoke as well [180].

4.17. Citral

Citral (3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadienal) is a mixture of geranial and neral (two acyclic monoterpene aldehydes that are geometric isomers) and is considered an important raw material in the fragrance, pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetic industries. Geranial is the trans-citral and has a strong lemony odour, while neral has a sweet odour. This monoterpene has a cucumber, orris, fat, and green aroma and naturally occurs in herbs, plants, and citrus fruits [181]. It is a well-known biologically active compound present in various essential oils [182] and possesses antimicrobial [183], insecticidal [184], expectorant, appetite-stimulating, and spasmolytic properties, while also behaving as a weak diuretic and anti-inflammatory agent [156,185]. Recently, the anticancer potential of this natural product has been described, where the trans-isomer, geranial, is more potent than the cis-isomer, neral, both in vitro and in vivo [186]. However, there is confusion about the isomerism of these compounds. Zheng et al. (2022) identified neral as the cis-isomer of citral and demonstrated that geranial is more potent than neral against T. rubrum, and both inhibit ergosterol biosynthesis by affecting ERG6 [187]. Moreover, recent studies also report the biological activity of citral as antimicrobial without distinction between the activity of the two isomers [188]. Given the importance of isomerism in the activity of drugs, studies on this compound should preferably address the single isomers.

4.18. Other Aliphatic Aldehydes

Other aldehydes are used in fragrances, even though they are less studied. They also belong to the Cramer Classification. The Cramer decision tree [189] is used for categorizing non-carcinogenic chemicals in order to determine their Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) level [190]. Specifically, these aldehydes include 4-tricyclodecylidene butanal (Class III, High) [191], β,4-dimethylcyclohex-3-ene-1-propan-1-al (Class I, Low) [192], 1-methyl-4-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)cyclohex-3-ene-1-carbaldehyde (Class I, Low) [193], and α,α,6,6-tetramethylbicyclo [3.1.1]hept-2-ene-2-propionaldehyde (Class II) [194].

5. Aromatic Aldehydes

Aromatic aldehydes are largely used in cosmetics due to their fragrance, are essential in the aroma of Huangjiu, and play a role in the almond and sweet aromas [195]. Lilial, Bourgeonal, Nympheal, and Cyclamen aldehydes are some of the aromatic aldehydes present in perfumes and represent the so-called “Lily-of-the-valley fragrances” or “Muguet aldehydes” [196,197,198]. Several aromatic aldehydes have shown antibacterial and antibiofilm activity, and recently, nanogels synthesized by crosslinking kiwifruit-derived DNA’s primary amine and aromatic aldehydes, including cuminaldehyde, p-anisaldehyde, and vanillin, have demonstrated higher antibacterial effects in successfully protecting Caenorhabditis elegans from Pseudomonas aeruginosa-induced lethality [199]. However, the limit of these compounds is linked to their potential toxicity. 2-(4-tert-Butylbenzyl)propionaldehyde (BMHCA) is actually under restriction in Europe due to its potential toxicity, as described in detail below. Structurally related fragrance aldehydes, such as bourgeonal, cyclamen aldehyde, PHCA, and Nympheal, also adversely affect sperm formation in rats [200]. These compounds are summarized in Table 2 and analysed below.

5.1. Benzaldehyde

Benzaldehyde is the simplest member of the family of aromatic aldehydes. It is a clear, colourless to slightly yellowish oil, with an odour of bitter almonds and a burning aromatic taste. This characteristic odour is related to the trace amounts of free benzaldehyde, formed by hydrolysis of the glycoside amygdalin. Due to the reactive aldehyde hydrogen, the carbonyl group, and the benzene ring present in its structure, benzaldehyde is a versatile intermediate [201]. It is used in the chemical industry as a solvent and plasticizer and is considered a toxic pollutant if inhaled, causing nose and throat irritation; thus, a sensitive and selective detection method of benzaldehyde is often required [202]. Benzaldehyde is used in cosmetics as a denaturant, flavouring agent, and fragrance [203]. Benzaldehyde is considered a GRAS (Generally Regarded as Safe) food additive in the United States and a flavouring substance in the European Union [204,205,206]. Benzaldehyde is absorbed through the skin and lungs and is then distributed to organs, but it does not accumulate in any specific tissue type. It is rapidly metabolized to benzoic acid, then conjugated with glucuronic acid or glycine, and excreted in the urine. The use pf benzaldehyde as an antimicrobial compound against bacteria and fungi has been widely demonstrated [206]. Its potent heat-sensitizing action has been suggested to improve the efficacy of sanitary measures against A. flavus-contaminated crop seeds [207]. Studies regarding its potential carcinogenicity are controversial. It was evaluated by the National Toxicology Program, which found evidence of carcinogenicity in mice but not in rats. However, some studies have suggested that benzaldehyde may have antitumor properties [208].

5.2. Furfural (2-Furaldehyde, Furan-2-Carboxaldehyde, Pyromucic Aldehyde, Pyromucic Aldehyde)

Furfural is a colourless, oily liquid with a pungent and aromatic odour that is produced or used in many industries such as petrochemicals, pharmaceuticals, oil refineries, food, and paper industries. It finds application in the manufacturing of more than 1600 chemical products, including rubber, synthetic resins, wetting agents, food flavouring agents, PCPs, and pesticides [209]. Furfural and its derivatives, especially 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, are also found in coffee, fruit, honey, vinegar, breakfast cereals, baked bread, milk, beverages, and fruit juices [210,211]. Furfural is considered a toxic compound with an LD50 of 65 mg/kg. Indeed, several methods for its removal from both aquatic and non-aquatic habitats have been proposed [212,213].

5.3. 4-Hydroxy-3-Methoxybenzaldehyde (Vanillin)

4-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde (or vanillin) is the main component of natural vanilla, which is one of the most widely used and important flavouring materials worldwide, possessing a rich, creamy, and distinctive vanilla smell. The source of vanilla is the bean, or pod, of the tropical Vanilla orchid, but it also occurs in trace amounts in other plants, such as tobacco [214]. Vanillin is the second most popular flavouring agent after saffron and has wide applications, e.g., as an additive in food and beverages (about 60%), as a masking agent in various pharmaceutical formulations (about 7%), and as a scent ingredient in the cosmetics sector (about 33%) [215]. However, plant-based vanillin can no longer meet the annual global demand for bio-vanillin; thus, it is generally chemically prepared. Three types of vanillin, namely, natural, biotechnological, and chemical/synthetic, are available on the market. Vanillin is used in food and non-food applications, in fragrances, and in pharmaceutical preparations. Only natural and nature-identical (biotechnologically produced from ferulic acid) vanillins are considered as food-grade additives by most food-safety control authorities globally [216]. New advances in the vanillin synthesis and biotransformation, obtained by using genetic/metabolic engineering of microbes, and sustainable methods for vanillin production from lignin on an industrial scale are carried out to overcome the toxicity of synthetic vanillin [217]. The use of natural deep eutectic solvent-based green extraction of vanillin has been suggested as an environmentally friendly approach for vanillin extraction, which leads to the production of a high-quality bioactive vanillin with lower environmental impact [218].

5.4. 4-Methoxybenzaldehyde (Anisaldehyde, para-Anisaldehyde, p-Anisaldehyde)

4-Methoxybenzaldehyde is derived from Pimpinella anisum L. and is used as an additive in the preparation of perfumes and in medicine for its antifungal property. It provides a sweet, floral, and strong almond odour of anise [219]. It is generally recognized as safe by the U.S. FDA and is often used as a food additive with antimicrobial and biofilm inhibition effects against Vibrio parahaemolyticus in salmon [220]. Recent studies have demonstrated that p-anisaldehyde can inhibit the growth of P. aeruginosa [221] and possesses antifungal activity against Penicillium digitatum and P. italicum, which are two postharvest pathogens in citrus, causing about 90% of the total loss of citrus fruit during storage and transportation [222], and Aspergillus flavus on peanut seeds [223], as well as Candida species [224]. Moreover, the combination with nistin has demonstrated activity against Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus [225,226]. However, 4-methoxybenzaldehyde may determine muscle atrophy, since it inhibits skeletal muscle myoblast differentiation by downregulating the expression of myogenic genes and upregulating muscle atrophy-associated ubiquitin ligases [227].

5.5. 2-Hydroxy-4-Methoxybenzaldehyde

2-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde (also called HMB or HMBA) [228,229] is a vanillin isomer flavour metabolite obtained from the root of medicinal plants [230], specifically Hemidesmus indicus, popularly known as ‘Anantmul’ [231], Decalepis salicifolia [232], Mondia whytei [233], and Decalepis hamiltonii [234]. Its antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus has been described, and the mechanism has recently been investigated [235]. Moreover, it exerts antifungal activity against Aspergillus flavus [236] and against Fusarium graminearum on wheat grains [237]. Recently, its involvement as an efflux pump inhibitor of Proteus mirabilis has been suggested [238]. Moreover, it appears to act through Excess Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) inhibition, followed by the modulation of agonist-induced cell migration, invasion, and angiogenesis, which can be useful in rheumatoid arthritis patients [239]. In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008, it belongs to chemical group 23 (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000). Exposure to this substance does not raise safety concerns [228].

5.6. Phenylpropanals—Floral Aromatic Aldehydes

5.6.1. 2-Phenylpropanal and 3-Phenylpropanal

2-Phenylpropanal (hydratropaldehyde) is an isomer of phenylpropanal and has a fresh, green leafy-floral, tart, hyacinth odour [240]. This compound, along with its derivatives is used in chemistry [241]. 3-Phenylpropanal has the simplest structure of this family, with a green, aldehydic, floral, and melon odour [242], among molecules having different substituents and in various positions of the aromatic ring and/or on the side chain. It is used in chemical reactions [243,244,245].

5.6.2. 3-(4-Isopropylphenyl)propanal (PHCA) or 3-(p-Cumenyl)propionaldehyde

3-(4-Isopropylphenyl)propanal (PHCA) or 3-(p-cumenyl)propionaldehyde (CyclemaxTM) has a fresh, floral, muguet odour, with a fruity melon nuance [200,240]. It is less studied and mentioned than the others [246]; however, studies on its potential toxicity were inconclusive, as detailed in the Notified classification and labelling according to the CLP (Classification, Labeling, and Packaging) criteria reported by the ECHA for this substance [247].

5.6.3. 3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal (BHCA, Bourgeonal, Lilional, Isolilial)

3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)propanal (BHCA, Bourgeonal®, Lilional®, Isolilial), having a floral, green, muguet, fresh, powerful odour and a diffusive fresh floral muguet, with a watery green character, can be found in fragrances such as “Alien” (Thierry Mugler) [198]. This aldehyde is manufactured and/or imported to the European Economic Area (EEA) at 10–100 tonnes per annum. It is used by consumers and professional workers in a vast range of products but may be detrimental to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure, with long-lasting effects, causing skin irritation and allergic skin reaction (ECHA) [248]. It may also adversely affect sperm formation in rats [200] and has been suggested to have the same activity in birds [249].

5.6.4. 3-(4-Isobutyl-2-Methylphenyl)propanal (Nympheal®)

3-(4-Isobutyl-2-methylphenyl)propanal (Nympheal®) was discovered by Andreas Goeke, Philip Kraft, Heike Laue, and coworkers at Givaudan in the search for a non-toxic Lilial® replacement in 2014 [250]. Among several designed compounds, Nympheal emerged as unique, not only in terms of odour threshold and olfactory qualities, but it also lacked adverse effects in a 28-day male rat reproductive toxicity study. It was hypothesized that the metabolic pathway leading to benzoic acid is disrupted by steric means of the adjacent methyl group [200,251]. Nympheal has a floral and aldehydic aroma. The name took inspiration from the painting series “Les Nimpheas” by Claude Monet [197].

5.6.5. 3-(4-Isopropylphenyl)-2-Methylpropanal (Cyclamen Aldehyde, PMHCA) or 3-p-Cumenyl-2-Methylpropionaldehyde (CPA)

Cyclamen aldehyde (3-(4-isopropylphenyl)-2-methylpropanal, PMHCA, cyclamal, 3-p-cumenyl-2-methylpropionaldehyde, Floral) is a commonly used fragrance material for its fresh flower smell (cyclamen, lilac, and violet) [252,253]. Among the synthetic molecules employed in perfumery, it is one of the most employed to recreate the muguet sensation. The presence of a stereogenic centre leads to the existence of two enantiomers, (R)- and (S)-cyclamen aldehyde [254]. In vivo studies in rats have demonstrated side effects on sperm maturation, likely related to the metabolite p-isopropyl-benzoic acid (p-iPBA). The in vitro accumulation of p-iPBA conjugated to coenzyme A (CoA) represents a metabolic sign related to reproductive toxicity in male rats. However, recent studies in rat, rabbits and human suspended hepatocytes demonstrated differences among the diverse species, where p-iPBA was detected only in rat hepatocytes. In plated rat hepatocytes, p-iPBA was conjugated to CoA, and the conjugate p-iPBA-CoA accumulated to stable levels over 22 h. p-iPBA-CoA was formed in vivo in the liver and testes of rats exposed to cyclamen aldehyde, whereas in plated rabbit and human hepatocytes, p-iPBA-CoA did not accumulate; thus, it was concluded that rabbits and humans are unlikely to be vulnerable to hepatic and testicular toxicity caused by p-iPBA [255].

5.6.6. 3-(4-Isobutylphenyl)-2-Methylpropanal (iBMHCA, Silvial®)

Silvial® is a trademark registered by Givaudan; the odour of Silvial is described as a “powerful, vibrant muguet ingredient with a slight citrus undertone and a fresh, aldehydic touch” [256]. The IFF (International Flavors and Fragrances) reports that canthoxal is reminiscent of “licorice, basil, fennel, anise note with a slight fruity, watery modification” [257]. The enantioselective synthesis of the (+)- and (−)-Silvial enantiomers has been recently described, and the olfactory activity of the single enantiomers has been evaluated [258]. The authors found that the (+)-enantiomer has a strong, floral, fatty, creamy, green, aldehydic, typically lily of the valley odour, whereas the (–)-isomer has a weak, floral, muguet, lilial-like odour. The odour detection threshold of the (+)-enantiomer is about five times lower than the one of the isomer.

5.6.7. 2-(4-tert-Butylbenzyl)propionaldehyde (BMHCA, Lilial, Lysmeral)

This synthetic compound [2-(4-tert-butylbenzyl)propionaldehyde] is generally known by its acronym, BMHCA, and its INCI (International Nomenclature Cosmetic Ingredient) name butylphenyl methylpropional. Several names are used to indicate this compound, as follows: BMHCA; benzenepropanal, 4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-α-methyl-; p-t-butyl-α-methyl-hydrocinnamaldehyde; p-BMHCA; p-t-butyl-α-methylhydrocinnamic aldehyde; α-methyl-β-(p-t-butylphenyl)propionaldehyde; p-t-bucinal; para-tert-bucinal; 2-(4-tert-butylbenzyl)propionaldehyde; butylphenyl methylpropional; 3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methylpropanal; 4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-α-methylbenzene propanal; and p-t-butyl-α-methylhydrocinnamic aldehyde. It is also known by its trade names, including Lilial®; Lysmeral®Extra; Lilyal; and Lilestralis®. Other names can be found in the scientific literature: Lilyal; pt-bucinal; and BPMP [259]. It is a synthetically produced aliphatic-aromatic aldehyde reminiscent of the smell of lily of the valley. BMHCA is a high-tonnage perfumery ingredient found in cosmetic and non-cosmetic products: it is present in hair oils (about 3%), deodorant sprays, specific hair care products, body milk, creams, and perfumes for women at about 2% concentration. Obviously, the predominant exposure route is dermal, but lysmeral can also be inhaled to a smaller extent [260]. The first studies on the toxicity of this drug were performed in 1980 and 1982 by Roche for the photosensitizing of guinea pigs. In 1984, the first studies on the mutagenicity of this compound were performed using the Salmonella/mammalian microsome plate incorporation assays. In 1986, acute respiratory sensory irritation, photoallergenicity, and acute eye irritation were recorded in mice and guinea pigs. Then, in 1990, hypersensitivity in albino guinea pigs was also reported. All these studies were not published but were summarized in detail by Bernauer et al. [261]. In 2008, BMHCA was suspected as a carcinogenic, mutagenic, and reprotoxic agent in humans, based on work by BASF SE (Kamp) researchers in male rats, and then it was found to induce premature births and to be environmentally harmful to aquatic organisms. Because of the observed reproductive toxicity effects in male rats, BASF classified BMHCA as CMR 2 (i.e., suspected to have carcinogenic, mutagenic, or reprotoxic potential for humans) [262], and in 2021, BMHCA was listed in the Annex II (n. 1666) [263], the list of substances whose presence in cosmetics is prohibited [264,265]. Moreover, the European Chemicals Agency Risk Assessment Committee evaluated a classification proposal of Lilial to be considered as toxic to reproduction (Commission 2021/1902). Since 1 March 2022, the use of BMHCA in cosmetic products has been prohibited, due to the CMR 1B classification in Europe [266]; however, it was not banned in household cleaners and detergents [267,268]. Since then, every month, new lists of products (perfumes, shampoos, soaps, body creams, cleansing milks, and household hygiene products such as detergents) retired from the market and containing this compound appear on the web (last ones September [269] and October 2023 [270]), based on the database of the RAPEX (Rapid Alert System for Dangerous Non-Food Products) system. The latter represents an early warning system for safety management by the European Commission (EC) and has a dedicated public website, the “Safety Gate”, which provides access to weekly updates of alerts submitted by national authorities participating in the system [271]. In the database of this system, information about dangerous cosmetic products sold in the EU market can be found [272]. However, it should be considered that Cosmetic Regulatory Frameworks differ all around the world [273]. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Health Canada, similarly to the EU, publish some lists for the control of cosmetic ingredients, even though they are not as comprehensive as the EU ones. Canada has the Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist [274], whereas the FDA has a list of a limited number of prohibited and restricted ingredients [275] and an additional Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR), which is an industry-funded panel of medical and researcher experts that review and evaluate the safety of many ingredients used in cosmetics [276,277]. In 2023, the European Chemical Agency (ECHA) classified BMHCA as a strong allergen (skin sensitizer), reproductive toxicant (carcinogenic, mutagenic, or toxic to reproduction, CMR 1B classification), and suspected endocrine disruptor [278]. The ECHA reported that oral administration of BMHCA produced testicular and spermatotoxic effects in rats, including disturbed spermiogenesis and spermatogenesis in tubuli seminiferi, affected sperm parameters (counts, motility, and morphology), and led to a decreased reproductive performance [279]. The ability of BMHCA to act as an androgen receptor agonist and the estrogenic and androgenic activity of its metabolites have not been tested yet. However, the evaluation as an endocrine-disrupting chemical is under assessment by the ECHA [280].
The uptake of p-BMHCA results in the formation of the metabolite para-tert-butyl-benzoic acid (p-TBBA), which is excreted as the main metabolite in the urine of test animals [279] or humans [260]. p-tert-Butyl-benzoic acid (tBBA) is formed in vitro in rat hepatocytes, and it is suspected to be responsible for the toxic effects [200,281]; the para substitution is likely involved in the toxic activity. Indeed, the application of the meta substituted fragrance aldehyde 3-(3-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methylpropanal (m-BMHCA) did not result in testes and sperm toxicity [200,282]. In the ex vivo study by Hareng et al. (2023) [246], an experiment was carried out using a 3D cell culture with primary seminiferous tubules from juvenile Sprague Dawley rats (Bio-AlteR® system) in order to investigate the relation between p-BMHCA-induced testicular/sperm toxicity and CoA conjugation of p-TBBA as the main metabolite of p-BMHCA. In this study, the two position isomers (para versus meta) of TBBA were studied. The authors concluded that p-TBBA-CoA conjugates are formed at p-TBBA concentrations affecting the spermatogenic processes. Moreover, a difference between p-TBBA and m-TBBA in disrupting spermatogenesis and CoA conjugate formation was observed, which identifies systemic p-TBBA and intracellular p-TBBA-CoA conjugate formation as a crucial metabolic event for p-BMHCA-induced testicular toxicity. It should be noted that the first studies on the toxicity of p-TBBA date back to ancient times [283,284]. On the other hand, there are a number of contradictory publications presenting inconsistent research data. In a study on the risk assessment conducted by the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES) in diapers, it was demonstrated that BMHCA penetrates only to a limited extent [285].
The article by Bernauer et al. (2017) [261] reported that the “Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) indicated that genotoxicity potential of BMHCA cannot be excluded”. In 2020, Api et al. [286] reported an in-depth study on this substance based on the RIFM Criteria Document. The authors found no genotoxicity for this substance and defined the Maximum Acceptable Concentrations in Finished Products (%). Moreover, the authors assessed that BMHCA is not PBT (Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic) as per the IFRA (International Fragrance Association) Environmental Standards, and its risk quotients, based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America, by PEC/PNEC (Predicted Environmental Concentration/Predicted No Effect Concentration) data, are less than 1. Furthermore, the mutagenic activity of BMHCA was evaluated in a bacterial reverse mutation assay conducted in compliance with GLP (Good Laboratory Practice) regulations and in accordance with OECD TG 471 on Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA using the standard plate incorporation and preincubation methods. The authors concluded that the majority of data in bacteria provide no evidence for the mutagenic potential of BMHCA. Jablonská et al. (2023) [287] recently reported a set of in vitro assays, including resazurin, CHO/HPRT mutation, γH2AX biomarker-based genotoxicity, qPCR, and in vitro reporter luciferase assays for the oestrogen, androgen, NF-κB, and NRF2 signalling pathways. The authors demonstrated that neither lilial nor its metabolites showed a negative effect on cell viability, at a concentration up to 100 µM. It was also evidenced that BMHCA was not an oestrogen or androgen receptor agonist, nor could BMHCA metabolites bind oestrogen or androgen receptors. Lilial and its metabolites did not show any nephrotoxic effect on human renal tubular cells, as assessed by the mutagenic activity in CHO-K1 cells up to 100 µM. BMHCA is a chiral compound [288]: it may exist as two isomers, namely, (2S)-3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methyl propanal and (2R)-3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methylpropanal. The isolation of the pure enantiomers is very difficult because of the presence of an α-chiral aldehyde bearing an asymmetric secondary carbon atom next to the carbonyl moiety. The pure enantiomers may easily racemize after isolation via keto-enol tautomerism. Nevertheless, further studies on the two enantiomers should be carried out. Moreover, biological and social diversities associated with sex and age as well as their interdependencies must be taken into account in human biomonitoring studies, since differences in exposure to lysmeral and the formation of its metabolite have been demonstrated [289,290]. Recent studies showed that several BMHCA-like chemicals induced male reproductive toxicity in animals [200,291].

5.6.8. 3-(4-Ethylphenyl)-2,2-Dimethylpropanal (Floralozone, Florone)

3-(4-Ethylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylpropanal (FloralozoneTM, Florone®) has a powerful, clean, green odour, containing a fresh air note reminiscent of the ocean breeze. It forms a typical aquatic accord that can be found in fragrances such as “Cool Water Fem” (Davidoff), “L’Eau d’Eden” (Cacharel), and “Polo Sport Woman” (R. Lauren). Floralozone is a colourless liquid first discovered in Lagotis Gaertn and is now mainly synthesized industrially. The interest in this compound has recently grown owing to its various activities. It has shown to improve cognitive dysfunction in rats with vascular dementia [292] and to inhibit atherosclerosis [293], and it has been suggested as a new possible strategy to treat ischemic stroke [294].

5.7. Cinnamaldehyde and Derivatives

5.7.1. Cinnamaldehyde (Cinnamic Aldehyde, Cinnamal, 3-Phenylacrolein, 3-Phenylpropenal)

Cinnamaldehyde is the major bioactive component obtained from the internal bark of Cinnamon trees [295]. The scent and aroma of cinnamon likely act as cognitive stimuli, which may ameliorate impairments in memory, visual-motor capacity, and virtual memory due to the presence of cinnamaldehyde [296]. Several activities have been reported for cinnamaldehyde: it may prevent fasting-induced hyperphagia, lipid accumulation, and inflammation in high-fat diet-fed mice and has been suggested as a therapy for rats with allergic rhinitis, as it demonstrated vascular congestion and plasma cell, eosinophil, and inflammatory cell infiltration into the lamina propria in rat models [297,298]. In vitro studies also showed that adding cinnamaldehyde to a cell medium can reduce tau and amyloid β aggregation and increase cell viability [299]. It has also been shown that cinnamaldehyde may be a useful compound in the treatment of caries, as it acts as an antimicrobial against S. mutans biofilm at sub-MIC levels and modulates hydrophobicity, aggregation, virulence gene expression, acid production, and tolerance [300,301]. In addition, cinnamaldehyde’s potential in the treatment and prevention of cancer has been recently underlined, as it regulates several signalling pathways that are effective against cancers [302]. Moreover, the potential use of cinnamaldehyde as a coadjuvant preventive treatment for COVID-19 disease has been recently suggested [303,304]. It showed anti-inflammatory activity and was able to reduce the SARS-CoV-2-induced cytokine storm by significantly reducing IL-1β release in an in vivo lung inflammatory model [303]. Trans-cinnamaldehyde has shown antimicrobial activity towards fungi, bacteria, and biofilms, as well as anti-mould, anti-diabetes, neuroprotective, and antioxidant activities [305,306,307]. It has even been suggested as a new candidate to curb bacterial resistance [308,309]. Trans-cinnamaldehyde is Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) by the U.S. FDA and the Flavour and Extract Manufacturer’s Association (FEMA) and has been granted A status (i.e., may be used in foodstuffs) by the Council of Europe [310]; thus, it is considered a safe food and flavour additive. However, it presents low water solubility, and in vivo, it may decompose to cinnamic acid. Moreover, it often causes allergic reactions as a constituent of perfumes and cosmetics, leading to the limitation of its use by the International Fragrance Research Association (IFRA) to 0.05% [311]. Recent in vitro Ames tests assessed the mutagenicity of cinnamaldehyde [312]. However, Alves et al. (2023) [313] recently reported an in vivo study on a pharmaceutical formulation (orabase ointment) containing cinnamaldehyde for the treatment of oral fungal infection. The authors demonstrated that in Galleria mellonella larvae, cinnamaldehyde was not toxic up to the highest dose tested (20 mg/kg) and was not genotoxic up to a dose of 4 mg/kg in a mouse model. In a study in which the potency range of known allergens for the risk of inducing skin sensitization encompasses at least five orders of magnitude, cinnamaldehyde was categorized as a moderate sensitizer, with doses ranging between 500 and 2500 µg/cm2 [314].

5.7.2. Amyl Cinnamal (Jasminaldehyde, Amyl Cinnamaldehyde)

Jasminaldehyde has a sweet, floral, oily, and waxy odour; it also has jasmine, honey, fruity, herbal undertones and some metallic, green, aldehydic character. It is present in perfumes and as a highly tenacious raw material commonly used in floral compositions for shampoos; soaps; detergents; in rinse-off, leave-on, and make-up products; deodorants; and room fresheners [315]. It is quite stable, but when heated, jasminaldehyde gets oilier and rancid in profile [316]. It has been recently studied for its effect on the fume suppression mechanism and road performance of styrene-butadiene-styrene asphalt, where amyl cinnamaldehyde-modified asphalt has been shown to be promising in fume prevention and emissions reduction [317].

5.7.3. α-Hexylcinnamaldehyde (HCA, Hexyl Cinnamal)

α-Hexylcinnamaldehyde (or hexyl cinnamal) is a broadly used fragrance chemical because its scent resembles jasmine, a typical floral scent, which makes it suitable to be used as a fragrance in PCPs (perfumes, shampoos, and creams) and household products and as a flavouring additive in food and the pharmaceutical industry. In the perfume and cosmetics industry, synthetic hexyl cinnamal is used, but it can be found naturally in chamomile oil [318]. This ingredient may cause an allergic skin reaction, and it is labelled by The European Chemicals Agency as a skin sensitizer [319]. Along with dodecanal and decanal, α-hexylcinnamaldehyde is one of the top five key compounds contained in Jasminum grandiflorum L. flowers [320]. It has been described as an endocrine-disrupting chemical included in synthetic detergents and air fresheners along with other compounds belonging to the same class [321].

6. Toxicity of Aldehydes and Mitigation of Their Toxic Effects in Humans

Toxicity from exposure to aldehydes has been widely described. The oxidative degradation of lipid membranes, also known as lipid peroxidation, generates over 200 types of aldehydes, many of which are highly reactive and toxic, including malondialdehyde, nonenal, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal acrolein, and formaldehyde. The accumulation of these aldehydes has been related to Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, metabolic syndrome and alcohol intolerance [322,323,324]. At the molecular level, aldehydes damage DNA and can cross-link DNA and proteins, thus leading to other diseases, including cancer, Fanconi’s anaemia, and Cockayne syndrome [325,326,327]. Moreover, an increased risk of cardiovascular disease was also attributed to the accumulation of aldehydes (secondary to alcohol consumption, ischaemia, or elevated oxidative stress) [328]. To mitigate the toxicity and pathogenesis related to aldehydes, the human body has several aldehyde-metabolizing systems such as aldehyde oxidases, cytochrome P450 enzymes [329], aldo-ketoreductases, alcohol dehydrogenases, short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases, and ALDHs [62]. These enzyme systems maintain a low level of aldehydes in the body by catalytically converting them into less-harmful and easily excreted products. ALDHs are able to detoxify a wide variety of endogenous and exogenous aldehydes to their corresponding carboxylic acids, thus helping to protect from oxidative stress and contributing to cellular and tissue homeostasis. The family of ALDHs contains 20 isozymes that are located in different subcellular compartments such as the cytosol, mitochondria, nucleus, and endoplasmic reticulum [62,330,331]. ALDHs also play a role in scavenging reactive oxygen species from aldehyde accumulation, thereby reducing oxidative stress in cells [332].

7. Methods for Removal of Aldehydes from Water and Air

Several methods have been described for the removal of aldehydes from aqueous solutions [333] The most common depuration solutions consist of steps of adsorption, oxidative [334,335], and biological processes, such as phytoremediation, i.e., a plant-based removal system [336]. In some cases, a combination of more than one method is required [337,338], especially when pollutants are particularly difficult to remove to the limits imposed by the law. Wang et al. (2020) [339] described the efficient removal of formaldehyde from water, with up to 99% removal efficiency, using a mesoporous calcium silicate hydrate. Salehi and Shafie (2020) [340] reported the dynamic adsorption of acetaldehyde from water on strong anionic resin of AMBERLITE IRA 402-OH after a pre-treatment with bisulfite obtaining an 86% pollutant removal. A solid surface including silica and polymer-linked systems are used as adsorbents to remove environmentally hazardous aldehydes from wastewater streams. Different aldehyde scavengers can be attached to the solid surface. Moreover, chitosan, a naturally occurring amine-rich polymer with diverse activities, can also be used for aldehyde removal [341].
The removal of anthropogenic pollutants such as aldehydes from the atmosphere consists of oxidation reactions, with the reaction of hydroxyl radicals being one of the most effective means [342]. Moreover, phytoremediation appears to be a low-cost, environmentally friendly solution for improving indoor air quality [343]. A vertical wetted-wall corona discharge reactor and a photocatalytic oxidation reactor were used for the removal of acetaldehyde in air [344,345]. Materials such as activated carbon, metal–organic frameworks, and mesoporous silica nanoparticles are also used for air quality remediation owing to their overall high surface area and accessibility of surface functionalization [346]. Wu et al. (2012) [347] described a collector design that placed cooking fumes in contact with a NaClO solution, reducing aldehyde concentrations up to 76% and emissions to 91%, which may represent a cost-effective measure for small food carts. In addition, the utilization of metal–organic frameworks for the adsorptive removal of an aliphatic aldehyde mixture in the gas phase was reported by Vikrant et al. (2020) [348]. Further, the removal of three aldehydes, specifically formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acrolein, from airstreams was obtained with high removal efficiency and a negligible pressure drop of the bed by using a biofilter packed with a mixture of compost–scoria–sugarcane bagasse [349].

8. Conclusions

Aldehydes are highly reactive chemical substances widely used in academia and industry and are highly present in our environment; they are largely found in cosmetics and pharmaceuticals and are widely used in plastic production, (bio)fuels, and perfumery applications. Exposure to aldehydes may occur in outdoor and indoor environments, including the workplace, and can also occur in foods and non-alcoholic beverages. Some aldehydes derive from natural sources, whereas others are synthetic. Generally, they are introduced into PCPs due to their very good scent. Over the years, extensive research has revealed the relationship between reactive aldehyde sources and the high risk of reactive aldehyde exposure, resulting in negative consequences for health. Indeed, for many of them, potential or certain toxicity has been demonstrated, which can also lead to carcinogenic effects. BMCA, for instance, has generally been withdrawn from the market in several countries. It is therefore necessary to understand whether it is better to use scented products of this type or encourage the use of less-scented products, such as perfumes of natural and non-synthetic origin, obtained from plants or with genetic and/or metabolic engineering and sustainable methods, to replace synthetically derived aldehydes. Overall, this review aims to summarize the most representative scientific observations and propose critical food for thought about the extensive use of aldehydes and their impact on the environment and, consequently, on human health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.C. and P.L.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C.; literature review, A.D. and C.S.; data curation, J.C. and M.M.; writing—review and editing, A.M. and D.I.; supervision, M.S.S. and P.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Supporting data are available within the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Feron, V.J.; Kruysse, A.; Til, H.P.; Immel, H.R.; Cassee, F.R. Aldehydes: Occurrence, Carcinogenic Potential, Mechanism of Action and Risk Assessment. Mutat. Res. Rev. Genet. Toxicol. 1991, 259, 363–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Teranishi, R.; Wick, E.L.; Hornstein, I. Flavor Chemistry. In Flavor Chemistry: Thirty Years of Progress; Teranishi, R., Wick, E.L., Hornstein, I., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1999; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  3. Takhar, M.; Li, Y.; Ditto, J.C.; Chan, A.W. Formation Pathways of Aldehydes from Heated Cooking Oils. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2023, 25, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Langton, K.; Patlewicz, G.Y.; Long, A.; Marchant, C.A.; Basketter, D.A. Structure-activity Relationships for Skin Sensitization: Recent Improvements to Derek for Windows. Contact Dermat. 2006, 55, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liao, C.L.; Shi, J.F.; Zhang, M.; Dalapati, R.; Tian, Q.Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, C.Y.; Zang, L. Optical Chemosensors for the Gas Phase Detection of Aldehydes: Mechanism, Material Design, and Application. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 6213–6245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ferreira, D.C.; Hernandes, K.C.; Nicolli, K.P.; Souza-Silva, É.A.; Manfroi, V.; Zini, C.A.; Welke, J.E. Development of a Method for Determination of Target Toxic Carbonyl Compounds in Must and Wine Using HS-SPME-GC/MS-SIM after Preliminary GC× GC/TOFMS Analyses. Food Anal. Methods 2019, 12, 108–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aljaafari, M.N.; Alkhoori, M.A.; Hag-Ali, M.; Cheng, W.H.; Lim, S.H.; Loh, J.Y.; Lai, K.S. Contribution of Aldehydes and their Derivatives to Antimicrobial and Immunomodulatory Activities. Molecules 2022, 27, 3589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hanif, M.A.; Nisar, S.; Khan, G.S.; Mushtaq, Z.; Zubair, M. Essential oils. In Essential Oil Research; Malik, S., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. Schober, L.; Dobiašová, H.; Jurkaš, V.; Parmeggiani, F.; Rudroff, F.; Winkler, M. Enzymatic Reactions towards Aldehydes: An Overview. Flavour Fragr. J. 2023, 38, 221–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Floss, M.A.; Fink, T.; Maurer, F.; Volk, T.; Kreuer, S.; Müller-Wirtz, L.M. Exhaled Aldehydes as Biomarkers for Lung Diseases: A Narrative Review. Molecules 2022, 27, 5258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Magnano, M.C.; Ahmed, W.; Wang, R.; Marušič, M.B.; Fowler, S.J.; White, I.R. Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds and Respiratory Disease: Recent Progress and Future Outlook. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2024, 176, 117739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lv, J.J.; Li, X.Y.; Shen, Y.C.; You, J.X.; Wen, M.Z.; Wang, J.B.; Yang, X.T. Assessing Volatile Organic Compounds Exposure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases in US Adults. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1210136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rodríguez-Zavala, J.S.; Calleja, L.F.; Moreno-Sánchez, R.; Yoval-Sánchez, B. Role of Aldehyde Dehydrogenases in Physiopathological Processes. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2019, 32, 405–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Stras, A.; Grassmann, A.; Van Campenhout, P.; Deconinck, E.; Vanhaecke, T.; Desmedt, B. Analysis of Preservatives and Fragrances in Topical Medical Devices: The Need for More Stringent Regulation. Contact Dermat. 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. World Health Organization. Occupational and Environmental Health Team, Guidelines for Air Quality. 2000. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/66537 (accessed on 18 October 2024).
  16. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Fundamentals of Indoor Air Quality in Buildings. 2018. Available online: https://www.jm.com/en/blog/2019/november/fundamentals-of-indoor-air-quality-in-buildings/ (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  17. Zhu, G.; Xiao, Z. Flavors and Fragrances: Structure of Various Flavors with Food Ingredients. In Flavors and Fragrances in Food Processing: Preparation and Characterization Methods; ACS Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2022; pp. 21–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sowndhararajan, K.; Kim, S. Influence of Fragrances on Human Psychophysiological Activity: With Special Reference to Human Electroencephalographic Response. Sci. Pharm. 2016, 84, 724–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. SCCNFP (Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products). The First Update of the Inventory of Ingredients Employed in Cosmetic Products. Section II: Perfume and Aromatic Raw Materials. SCCNFP/0389. 2000. Available online: www.leffingwell.com/cosmetics/out131_en.pdf (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  20. Di Sotto, A.; Maffei, F.; Hrelia, P.; Di Giacomo, S.; Pagano, E.; Borrelli, F.; Mazzanti, G. Genotoxicity assessment of some cosmetic and food additives. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 2014, 68, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF). Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 94, Revision 1 (FGE. 94Rev1): Consideration of aliphatic amines and amides evaluated in an addendum to the group of aliphatic and aromatic amines and amides evaluated by the JECFA (68th meeting). EFSA J. 2012, 10, 2747. [Google Scholar]
  22. Min, C.; Biyi, M.; Jianneng, L.; Yimin, L.; Yijun, L.M.; Long, C. Characterization of the Volatile Organic Compounds Produced from Green Coffee in Different Years by Gas Chromatography Ion Mobility Spectrometry. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 15534–15542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cecchi, L.; Migliorini, M.; Mulinacci, N. Virgin Olive Oil Volatile Compounds: Composition, Sensory Characteristics, Analytical Approaches, Quality Control, and Authentication. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 2013–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ling, L.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, W.; Jiang, K.; Luo, H.; Pang, M.; Yue, R. Research Progress of Volatile Organic Compounds Produced by Plant Endophytic Bacteria in Control of Postharvest Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 39, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mohidem, N.A.; Hashim, N.; Shamsudin, R.; Che Man, H. Rice for Food Security: Revisiting its Production, Diversity, Rice Milling Process and Nutrient Content. Agriculture 2022, 12, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Theloke, J.; Friedrich, R. Compilation of a Database on the Composition of Anthropogenic VOC Emissions for Atmospheric Modeling in Europe. Atmospher. Environ. 2007, 41, 4148–4160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Alabdulhadi, A.; Ramadan, A.; Devey, P.; Boggess, M.; Guest, M. Inhalation Exposure to Volatile Organic Compounds in the Printing Industry. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2019, 69, 1142–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. McDonald, B.C.; De Gouw, J.A.; Gilman, J.B.; Jathar, S.H.; Akherati, A.; Cappa, C.D.; Jimenez, J.L.; Lee-Taylor, J.; Hayes, P.L.; McKeen, S.A.; et al. Volatile Chemical Products Emerging as Largest Petrochemical Source of Urban Organic Emissions. Science 2018, 359, 760–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Gkatzelis, G.I.; Coggon, M.M.; McDonald, B.C.; Peischl, J.; Gilman, J.B.; Aikin, K.C.; Robinson, M.A.; Canonaco, F.; Prevot, A.S.H.; Trainer, M.; et al. Observations Confirm that Volatile Chemical Products Are a Major Source of Petrochemical Emissions in U.S. Cities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 4332–4343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Verma, M.; Pervez, S.; Majumdar, D.; Chakrabarty, R.; Pervez, Y.F. Emission Estimation of Aromatic and Halogenated VOCs from Household Solid Fuel Burning Practices. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 2683–2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Palmisani, J.; Nørgaard, A.W.; Kofoed-Sørensen, V.; Clausen, P.A.; de Gennaro, G.; Wolkoff, P. Formation of Ozone-Initiated VOCs and Secondary Organic Aerosol Following Application of a Carpet Deodorizer. Atmos. Environ. 2020, 222, 117149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Davies, H.L.; O’Leary, C.; Dillon, T.; Shaw, D.R.; Shaw, M.; Mehra, A.; Phillips, G.; Carslaw, N. A measurement and modelling investigation of the indoor air chemistry following cooking activities. Environ. Sci. Proc. Imp. 2023, 25, 1532–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rádis-Baptista, G. Do Synthetic Fragrances in Personal Care and Household Products Impact Indoor Air Quality and Pose Health Risks? J. Xenobiotics 2023, 13, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Asif, Z.; Chen, Z.; Haghighat, F.; Nasiri, F.; Dong, J. Estimation of Anthropogenic VOCs Emission Based on Volatile Chemical Products: A Canadian Perspective. Environ. Manag. 2022, 71, 685–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tran, V.V.; Park, D.; Lee, Y.C. Indoor air pollution, related human diseases, and recent trends in the control and improvement of indoor air quality. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ancione, G.; Lisi, R.; Milazzo, M.F. Human health risk associated with emissions of volatile organic compounds due to the ship-loading of hydrocarbons in refineries. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2021, 12, 432–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mo, Z.; Lu, S.; Shao, M. Volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions and health risk assessment in paint and coatings industry in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 269, 115740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mahilang, M.; Deb, M.K.; Pervez, S. Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosols: A Review on Formation Mechanism, Analytical Challenges and Environmental Impacts. Chemosphere 2021, 262, 127771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhao, Z.; Ma, S.; Gao, B.; Bi, F.; Qiao, R.; Yang, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhang, X. A systematic review of intermediates and their characterization methods in VOCs degradation by different catalytic technologies. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 314, 123510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Moloney, M.G. Reactions of Aldehydes and Ketones and Their Derivatives. Org. React. Mech. 2020, 2024, 1–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. da Silva, F.M.; Junior, J.J.; Hernández Muñoz, J.A. The Chemistry of Aldehydes and Ketones in the Synthesis of Heterocycles-Historical Reactions with a New and Green Perspective. Curr. Org. Chem. 2024, 28, 1023–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bai, M.; Zhang, L.; Liu, L.; Jia, C.; Zheng, Y.; Shang, H.; Sun, H.; Cui, B. Recent Advances in Trifluoromethylation of Olefins, Aldehydes, and Ketones. Curr. Org. Chem. 2024, 28, 1229–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Arctander, S. Perfume and Flavor Chemicals (Aroma Chemicals); Allured Publishing Corporation: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kapadia, N.; Meyers, K.; Jain, S.; Modi, S. A Cross-Sectional Survey Analysis of the Human Olfactory Senses for Perfumes and its Alternations due to COVID-19. Int. J. Curr. Sci. Res. Rev. 2023, 6, 3870–3888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, T.; Xue, Y.; Li, C.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, H.; Feng, Y.; Xiang, H.; Chen, S. Identification of Key Volatile Compounds in Tilapia during Air Frying Process by Quantitative Gas Chromatography–Ion Mobility Spectrometry. Molecules 2024, 29, 4516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Atamaleki, A.; Motesaddi Zarandi, S.; Massoudinejad, M.; Hesam, G.; Naimi, N.; Esrafili, A.; Fakhri, Y.; Mousavi Khaneghah, A. Emission of aldehydes from different cooking processes: A review study. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2022, 15, 1183–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, W.; Bai, Z.; Shi, L.; Son, J.H.; Li, L.; Wang, L.; Chen, J. Investigating Aldehyde and Ketone Compounds Produced from Indoor Cooking Emissions and Assessing their Health Risk to Human Beings. J. Environ. Sci. 2023, 127, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hu, Y.; Zhao, G.-H.; Yin, F.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhou, D.; Shahidi, F.; Zhu, B. Effects of Roasting Temperature and Time on Aldehyde Formation Derived from Lipid Oxidation in Scallop (Patinopecten yessoensis) and the Deterrent Effect by Antioxidants of Bamboo Leaves. Food Chem. 2022, 369, 130936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wang, X.; Chan, A.W. Particulate Matter and Volatile Organic Compound Emissions Generated from a Domestic Air Fryer. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 17384–17392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Rajendran, S.; Silcock, P.; Bremer, P. Flavour Volatiles of Fermented Vegetable and Fruit Substrates: A Review. Molecules 2023, 28, 3236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Albarri, R.; Vardara, H.F.; Al, S.; Önal, A. Chromatographic Methods and Sample Pretreatment Techniques for Aldehydes, Biogenic Amine, and Carboxylic Acids in Food Samples. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. de Lacy Costello, B.; Amann, A.; Al-Kateb, H.; Flynn, C.; Filipiak, W.; Khalid, T.; Osborne, D.; Ratcliffe, N.M. A Review of the Volatiles from the Healthy Human Body. J. Breath Res. 2014, 8, 014001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sarker, D.; Hossen, M.F.; Zahan1, M.K.; Haque, M.M.; Zamir, R.; Asraf, M.A. Synthesis, Characterization, Thermal Analysis and Antibacterial Activity of Cu(II) and Ni(II) Complexes with Thiosemicarbazone Derived from Thiophene-2-aldehyde. J. Mater. Sci. Res. Rev. 2020, 5, 15–25. [Google Scholar]
  54. Lin, J.; Meng, H.; Guo, X.; Tang, Z.; Yu, S. Natural Aldehyde-Chitosan Schiff Base: Fabrication, pH-Responsive Properties, and Vegetable Preservation. Foods 2023, 12, 2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, J.; Zhang, S.; Wang, L.; Tan, W.; Li, Q.; Guo, Z. The Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of the Pyridine-4-aldehyde Schiff Bases Grafted Chloracetylchitosan Oligosaccharide Derivatives. Starch-Stärke 2023, 75, 2100268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sinicropi, M.S.; Ceramella, J.; Iacopetta, D.; Catalano, A.; Mariconda, A.; Rosano, C.; Saturnino, C.; El-Kashef, H.; Longo, P. Metal Complexes with Schiff Bases: Data Collection and Recent Studies on Biological Activities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Vera, S.; Landa, A.; Mielgo, A.; Ganboa, I.; Oiarbide, M.; Soloshonok, V. Catalytic Asymmetric α-Functionalization of α-Branched Aldehydes. Molecules 2023, 28, 2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Iacopetta, D.; Ceramella, J.; Catalano, A.; Mariconda, A.; Giuzio, F.; Saturnino, C.; Longo, P.; Sinicropi, M.S. Metal Complexes with Schiff Bases as Antimicrobials and Catalysts. Inorganics 2023, 11, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Salem, H.; Cullumbine, H. Inhalation toxicities of some aldehydes. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1960, 2, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. El-Maghrabey, M.H.; El-Shaheny, R.; El Hamd, M.A.; Al-Khateeb, L.A.; Kishikawa, N.; Kuroda, N. Aldehydes’ Sources, Toxicity, Environmental Analysis, and Control in Food. In Organic Pollutants: Toxicity and Solutions; Vasanthy, M., Sivasankar, V., Sunitha, T.G., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 117–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. LoPachin, R.M.; Gavin, T. Molecular Mechanisms of Aldehyde Toxicity: A Chemical Perspective. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2014, 27, 1081–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Laskar, A.A.; Younus, H. Aldehyde Toxicity and Metabolism: The Role of Aldehyde Dehydrogenases in Detoxification, Drug Resistance and Carcinogenesis. Drug Metab. Rev. 2019, 51, 42–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sinharoy, P.; Mcallister, S.L.; Vasu, M.; Gross, E.R. Environmental Aldehyde Sources and the Health Implications of Exposure. In Aldehyde Dehydrogenases. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Ren, J., Zhang, Y., Ge, J., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; Volume 1193, pp. 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Conklin, D.J.; Guo, Y.; Nystoriak, M.A.; Jagatheesan, G.; Obal, D.; Kilfoil, P.J.; Hoetker, J.D.; Guo, L.; Bolli, R.; Bhatnagar, A. TRPA1 Channel Contributes to Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2019, 316, H889–H899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ribeaucourt, D.; Bissaro, B.; Lambert, F.; Lafond, M.; Berrin, J.G. Biocatalytic Oxidation of Fatty Alcohols into Aldehydes for the Flavors and Fragrances Industry. Biotechnol. Adv. 2022, 56, 107787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhou, J.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Y. Bioaldehydes and Beyond: Expanding the Realm of Bioderived Chemicals Using Biogenic Aldehydes as Platforms. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2020, 59, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kazimírová, V.; Rebroš, M. Production of Aldehydes by Biocatalysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, Y.; Liu, X.F.; He, W.M. Recent Advances in the Photocatalytic Synthesis of Aldehydes. Org. Chem. Front. 2023, 10, 4198–4210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Dickey, R.M.; Forti, A.M.; Kunjapur, A.M. Advances in Engineering Microbial Biosynthesis of Aromatic Compounds and Related Compounds. Bioresourc. Bioprocess. 2021, 8, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, H.; Ma, L.; Chen, J.; Zhao, F.; Huang, X.; Dong, X.; Zhu, B.; Qin, L. Effect of Aliphatic Aldehydes on Flavor Formation in Glutathione–Ribose Maillard Reactions. Foods 2023, 12, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Ding, Y.; Peng, W.Y.; Strand, C.L.; Hanson, R.K. Quantitative Measurements of Broad-band Mid-infrared Absorption Spectra of Formaldehyde, Acetaldehyde, and Acetone at Combustion-relevant Temperatures near 5.7 µm. J. Quantit. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 2020, 248, 106981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dattilo, S.; Gugliuzzo, C.; Mirabella, E.F.; Puglisi, C.; Scamporrino, A.A.; Zampino, D.C.; Samperi, F. Characterization of VOCs and Additives in Italian PET Bottles and Studies on Potential Functional Aldehydes Scavengers. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2022, 248, 1407–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Yang, W.; Zhao, W.; Zhao, G.; Cui, H.; Wen, J. Identification of Characteristic Aroma Compounds in Chicken Meat and their Metabolic Mechanisms Using Gas Chromatography-Olfactometry, Odor Activity Values, and Metabolomics. Food Res. Int. 2023, 175, 113782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wallington, T.J.; Anderson, J.E.; Dolan, R.H.; Winkler, S.L. Vehicle Emissions and Urban Air Quality: 60 Years of Progress. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Shi, B.; Chai, Y.; Qin, P.; Zhao, X.-X.; Li, W.; Zhang, Y.-M.; Wei, T.-B.; Lin, Q.; Yao, H.; Qu, W.-J. Detection of Aliphatic Aldehydes by a Pillar[5]arene-based Fluorescent Supramolecular Polymer with Vaporchromic Behavior. Chem. Asian. J. 2020, 17, e202101421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zheng, J.-J.; Liu, W.-C.; Lu, F.-N.; Tang, Y.; Yuan, Z.-Q. Recent Progress in Fluorescent Formaldehyde Detection Using Small Molecule Probes. J. Anal. Test. 2022, 6, 204–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ahangar, R.M.; Farmanzadeh, D. O-doping Effects on the Adsorption and Detection of Acetaldehyde and Ethylene Oxide on Phosphorene Monolayer: A DFT Investigation. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2023, 813, 140315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Pennings, J.L.A.; Cremers, J.W.J.M.; Becker, M.J.A.; Klerx, W.N.M.; Talhout, R. Aldehyde and Volatile Organic Compound Yields in Commercial Cigarette Mainstream Smoke Are Mutually Related and Depend on the Sugar and Humectant Content in Tobacco. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2020, 22, 1748–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Api, A.M.; Belsito, D.; Bruze, M.; Cadby, P.; Calow, P.; Dagli, M.L.; Dekant, W.; Ellis, G.; Fryer, A.D.; Fukayama, M.; et al. Criteria for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. (RIFM) safety evaluation process for fragrance ingredients. Food Chem. Toxicol. Int. J. Publ. Br. Ind. Biol. Res. Assoc. 2015, 82, S1–S19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. REACH 2006. Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 (REACH) Official Journal of the European Union. Available online: https://osha.europa.eu/it/legislation/directives/regulation-ec-no-1907-2006-of-the-european-parliament-and-of-the-council (accessed on 18 October 2024).
  81. Brewer, T.F.; Chang, C.J. An Aza-Cope Reactivity-Based Fluorescent Probe for Imaging Formaldehyde in Living Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10886–10889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Dou, K.; Chen, G.; Yu, F.; Liu, Y.; Chen, L.; Cao, Z.; Chen, T.; Li, Y.; You, J. Bright and Sensitive Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe Enabling Endogenous FA Imaging and Mechanistic Exploration of Indirect Oxidative Damage Due to FA in Various Living Systems. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 7851–7861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Blondel, A.; Plaisance, H. Screening of Formaldehyde Indoor Sources and Quantification of Their Emission Using a Passive Sampler. Build. Environ. 2011, 46, 1284–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tang, Y.; Kong, X.; Liu, Z.R.; Xu, A.; Lin, W. Lysosome-Targeted Turn-On Fluorescent Probe for Endogenous Formaldehyde in Living Cells. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 9359–9363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sutherland, B.W.; Toews, J.; Kast, J. Utility of Formaldehyde Cross-Linking and Mass Spectrometry in the Study of Protein–Protein Interactions. J. Mass Spectrom. 2008, 43, 699–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhu, H.B.; She, J.Y.; Zhou, M.L.; Fan, X.D. Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Formaldehyde Using Portable 2-Dimensional Gas Chromatography Equipped with Photoionization Detectors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 283, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. International-Agency-for-Research-on-Cancer. Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-Tert-Butoxy-2-Propanol; World Health Organization: Lyon, France, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  88. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006; Volume 88, pp. 39–325. [Google Scholar]
  89. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Chemical Agents and Related Occupations. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012; Volume 100, pp. 9–562. [Google Scholar]
  90. Salthammer, T. The Formaldehyde Dilemma. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2015, 218, 433–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Reingruber, H.; Pontel, L.B. Formaldehyde Metabolism and Its Impact on Human Health. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2018, 9, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hoffman, E.A.; Frey, B.L.; Smith, L.M.; Auble, D.T. Formaldehyde Crosslinking: A Tool for the Study of Chromatin Complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 26404–26411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Adamović, D.; Čepić, Z.; Adamović, S.; Stošić, M.; Obrovski, B.; Morača, S.; Miloradov, M.V. Occupational Exposure to Formaldehyde and Cancer Risk Assessment in an Anatomy Laboratory. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kang, D.S.; Kim, H.S.; Jung, J.H.; Lee, C.M.; Ahn, Y.S.; Seo, Y.R. Formaldehyde Exposure and Leukemia Risk: A Comprehensive Review and Network-based Toxicogenomic Approach. Genes Environ. 2021, 43, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Osman, A.S.; Labib, D.A.; Kamel, M.M. Carvedilol Can Attenuate Histamine-Induced Paw Edema and Formaldehyde-Induced Arthritis in Rats without Risk of Gastric Irritation. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2017, 50, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Bernardini, L.; Barbosa, E.; Charão, M.F.; Brucker, N. Formaldehyde Toxicity Reports from In Vitro and In Vivo Studies: A Review and Updated Data. Drug. Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 45, 972–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nishikawa, A.; Nagano, K.; Kojima, H.; Ogawa, K. A Comprehensive Review of Mechanistic Insights into Formaldehyde-induced Nasal Cavity Carcinogenicity. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2021, 123, 104937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Andersen, M.E.; Gentry, P.R.; Swenberg, J.A.; Mundt, K.A.; White, K.W.; Thompson, C.; Bus, J.; Sherman, J.H.; Greim, H.; Bolt, H.; et al. Considerations for Refining the Risk Assessment Process for Formaldehyde: Results from an Interdisciplinary Workshop. Reg. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2019, 106, 210–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Zhao, Y.; Magaña, L.C.; Cui, H.; Huang, J.; McHale, C.M.; Yang, X.; Looney, M.R.; Li, R.; Zhang, L. Formaldehyde-induced Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cell Toxicity in Mouse Lung and Nose. Arch. Toxicol. 2021, 95, 693–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Awad, J.; Jung, C. Evaluating the Indoor Air Quality after Renovation at the Greens in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Buildings 2021, 11, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. WHO. Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected Pollutants; World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe: Bonn, Germany, 2010; ISBN 978 92 890 0213 4. [Google Scholar]
  102. van den Broek, J.; Cerrejon, D.K.; Pratsinis, S.E.; Güntner, A.T. Selective Formaldehyde Detection at ppb in Indoor Air with a Portable Sensor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 399, 123052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Mitsubayashi, K.; Nishio, G.; Sawai, M.; Saito, T.; Kudo, H.; Saito, H.; Otsuka, K.; Noguer, T.; Marty, J.L. A Bio-sniffer Stick with FALDH (formaldehyde dehydrogenase) for Convenient Analysis of Gaseous Formaldehyde. Sens. Actuat. B-Chem. 2008, 130, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. He, Q.; Li, J.; Feng, Q. Ppb-level Formaldehyde Detection System Based on a 3.6 µm Interband Cascade Laser and Mode-locked Cavity Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy with Self-calibration of the Locking Frequency. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2020, 105, 103205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Peng, X.; Liu, J.; Tan, Y.; Mo, R.; Zhang, Y. A CuO thin film type sensor via inkjet printing technology with high reproducibility for ppb-level formaldehyde detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 362, 131775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Protano, C.; Antonucci, A.; De Giorgi, A.; Zanni, S.; Mazzeo, E.; Cammalleri, V.; Fabiani, L.; Mastrantonio, R.; Muselli, M.; Mastrangeli, G.; et al. Exposure and Early Effect Biomarkers for Risk Assessment of Occupational Exposure to Formaldehyde: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Arias-Pérez, I.; Sáenz-Navajas, M.P.; de-la-Fuente-Blanco, A.; Ferreira, V.; Escudero, A. Insights on the Role of Acetaldehyde and Other Aldehydes in the Odour and Tactile Nasal Perception of Red Wine. Food Chem. 2021, 361, 130081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Majchrowicz, E.; Mendelsen, J.H. Blood Concentrations of Acetaldehyde and Ethanol in Chronic Alcoholics. Science 1970, 168, 1100–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. Available online: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.EXE?ZyActionL=Register&User=anonymous&Password=anonymous&Client=EPA&Init=1 (accessed on 18 October 2024).
  110. Bauer, K.; Garbe, D.; Surburg, H. Common Fragrance and Flavor Materials: Preparation, Properties and Uses; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2001; p. 293. [Google Scholar]
  111. Sanz-Novo, M.; Belloche, A.; Rivilla, V.M.; Garrod, R.T.; Alonso, J.L.; Redondo, P.; Barrientos, C.; Kolesniková, L.; Valle, J.C.; Rodríguez-Almeida, L.; et al. Toward the Limits of Complexity of interstellar chemistry: Rotational spectroscopy and astronomical search for n-and i-butanal. Astron. Astrophys. 2022, 666, A114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Chisega-Negrilă, C.G.; Diacon, A.; Călinescu, I.; Vînătoru, M.; Berger, D.; Matei, C.; Vasilievici, G. On the Ultrasound-assisted Preparation of Cu/SiO2 System as a Selective Catalyst for the Conversion of Biobutanol to Butanal. Chem. Pap. 2022, 76, 1443–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Chang, C.; Wu, G.; Zhang, H.; Jin, Q.; Wang, X. Deep-fried Flavor: Characteristics, Formation Mechanisms, and Influencing Factors. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 1496–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Rosati, J.A.; Krebs, K.A.; Liu, X. Emissions from Cooking Microwave Popcorn. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2007, 47, 701–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Yang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Chen, J.; Xie, J.; Shen, S.; Deng, Y.; Zhu, J.; Yuan, H.; Jiang, Y. Characterization of the Key Aroma Compounds in Black Teas with Different Aroma Types by Using Gas Chromatography Electronic Nose, Gas Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometry, and Odor Activity Value Analysis. LWT 2022, 163, 113492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Del Toro-Gipson, R.S.; Rizzo, P.V.; Hanson, D.J.; Drake, M. Sensory Characterization of Specific Wood Smoke Aromas and their Contributions to Smoked Cheddar Cheese Flavor. J. Sens. Studies 2020, 35, e12564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Chen, C.; Yuan, J.; Yu, H.; Lou, X.; Wang, B.; Xu, Z.; Tian, H. Cloning, Purification, and Characterization of Branched-chain α-keto Acid Decarboxylases from Lactococcus lactis Strains with Different 3-Methylbutanal Production Abilities. Food Biosci. 2022, 47, 101713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Du, W.; Zhao, M.; Zhen, D.; Tan, J.; Wang, T.; Xie, J. Key Aroma Compounds in Chinese Fried Food of Youtiao. Flav. Fragr. J. 2020, 35, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Meng, H.Y.; Piccand, M.; Fuchsmann, P.; Dubois, S.; Baumeyer, A.; Tena Stern, M.; Von Ah, U. Formation of 3-Methylbutanal and 3-Methylbutan-1-ol Recognized as Malty during Fermentation in Swiss Raclette-Type Cheese, Reconstituted Milk, and de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe Broth. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 717–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Yuan, C.; Xu, C.; Chen, L.; Yang, J.; Qiao, M.; Wu, Z. Effect of Different Cooking Methods on the Aroma and Taste of Chicken Broth. Molecules 2024, 29, 1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Li, B.; Wang, Z.; Yang, G.; Huang, S.; Liao, S.; Chen, K.; Du, M.; Zalan, Z.; Hegyi, F.; Kan, J. Biocontrol Potential of 1-Pentanal Emitted from Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains against Aspergillus flavus in Red Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Food Control 2022, 142, 109261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Frankel, E.N. Volatile lipid oxidation products. Progr. Lip. Res. 1983, 22, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Cho, Y.; Song, M.; Kim, T.S.; Ryu, J.C. DNA Methylome Analysis of Saturated Aliphatic Aldehydes in Pulmonary Toxicity. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Majchrzak, T.; Marc, M.; Wasik, A. Understanding the Early-Stage Release of Volatile Organic Compounds from Rapeseed Oil During Deep-Frying of Tubers by Targeted and Omics-Inspired Approaches Using Ptr-Ms and Gas Chromatography. Food Res. Int. 2022, 160, 111716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Müller-Wirtz, L.M.; Kiefer, D.; Maurer, F.; Floss, M.A.; Doneit, J.; Hüppe, T.; Shopova, T.; Wolf, B.; Sessler, D.I.; Volk, T.; et al. Volutrauma Increases Exhaled Pentanal in Rats: A Potential Breath Biomarker for Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury. Anesth. Analg. 2021, 133, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ma, D.; Zhao, H.; Liu, Z.; Liu, M.; Qi, P.; Di, S.; Zhang, S.; Wang, X. Recent Advances on Mulberry Volatile Flavor: A Review. J. Food Composit. Anal. 2023, 124, 105665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ernstgård, L.; Iregren, A.; Sjögren, B.; Svedberg, U.; Johanson, G. Acute Effects of Exposure to Hexanal Vapors in Humans. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2006, 48, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Lu, X.; Gao, Y.; Wang, K.; Sun, S.M.; Liu, Z.; Yan, P.; Feng, J.R.; Li, Q.S.; Li, L.W.; Wang, D.J. Dwarf Interstocks Improve Aroma Quality of ‘Huahong’ Apple (Malus × domestica). Agriculture 2022, 12, 1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ma, Z.; Yang, S.; Mao, J.; Li, W.; Li, W.; Zuo, C.; Chu, M.; Zhao, X.; Zhou, Q.; Chen, B. Effects of Shading on the Synthesis of Volatile Organic Compounds in ‘Marselan’ grape berries (Vitis vinifera L.). J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 679–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Öz, A.T.; Kafkas, E. Volatile Compositions of Strawberry Fruit during Shelf Life Using Pre and Postharvest Hexanal Treatment. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, e16464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Furia, T.E.; Bellanca, N. Fenaroli’s Handbook of Flavor Ingredients; CRC Press, Inc.: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1975; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  132. Thomas, S.L.; Myers, C.; Schug, K.A. Comparison of Fragrance and Flavor Components in Non-psilocybin and Psilocybin Mushrooms Using Vacuum-assisted Headspace High-capacity Solid-phase Microextraction and Gas Chromatography–mass Spectrometry. Adv. Sample Prep. 2023, 8, 100090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Aisala, H.; Sola, J.; Hopia, A.; Linderborg, K.M.; Sandell, M. Odor-contributing Volatile Compounds of Wild Edible Nordic Mushrooms Analyzed with HS–SPME–GC–MS and HS–SPME–GC–O/FID. Food Chem. 2019, 283, 566–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Ashitha, G.N.; Sunny, A.C.; Nisha, R. Effect of Pre-harvest and Post-harvest Hexanal Treatments on Fruits and Vegetables: A Review. Agricult. Rev. 2020, 41, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Paliyath, G.; Padmanabhan, P. Chapter 4: Preharvest and Postharvest Technologies Based on Hexanal: An Overview. In Postharvest Biology and Nanotechnology, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Pondicherry, India, 2019; pp. 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Kaur, K.; Kaur, G.; Brar, J.S. Pre-Harvest Application of Hexanal Formulations for Improving Post-Harvest Life and Quality of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) Cv. Dashehari. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 4257–4264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Öz, A.T.; Eryol, B.; Ali, M.A. Postharvest Hexanal Application Delays Senescence and Maintains Quality in Persimmon Fruit During Low-temperature Storage. J. Sci. Food Agricult. 2023, 103, 7653–7663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Dhakshinamoorthy, D.; Sundaresan, S.; Iyadurai, A.; Subramanian, K.S.; Janavi, G.J.; Paliyath, G.; Subramanian, J. Hexanal vapor induced resistance against major postharvest pathogens of banana (Musa acuminata L.). Plant Pathol. J. 2020, 36, 133–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Öz, A.T.; Ali, A. Retaining Overall Quality of Fresh Figs by Postharvest Hexanal Vapor Treatment during Cold Storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2023, 205, 112539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Cho, Y.; Song, M.K.; Jeong, S.C.; Lee, K.; Heo, Y.; Kim, T.S.; Ryu, J.C. MicroRNA Response of Inhalation Exposure to Hexanal in Lung Tissues from Fischer 344 Rats. Environ. Toxicol. 2016, 31, 1909–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Corradi, M.; Rubinstein, I.; Andreoli, R.; Manini, P.; Caglieri, A.; Poli, D.; Alinovi, R.; Mutti, A. Aldehydes in Exhaled Breath Condensate of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003, 167, 1380–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Phillips, M.; Cataneo, R.N.; Ditkoff, B.A.; Fisher, P.; Greenberg, J.; Gunawardena, R.; Kwon, C.S.; Tietje, O.; Wong, C. Prediction of Breast Cancer Using Volatile Biomarkers in the Breath. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2006, 99, 19–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ulanowska, A.; Kowalkowski, T.; Trawińska, E.; Buszewski, B. The Application of Statistical Methods Using VOCs to Identify Patients with Lung Cancer. J. Breath Res. 2011, 5, 046008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Zhang, K.; Zhang, T.-T.; Guo, R.-R.; Ye, Q.; Zhao, H.-L.; Huang, X.-H. The Regulation of Key Flavor of Traditional Fermented Food by Microbial Metabolism: A Review. Food Chem. X 2023, 19, 100871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Yanru, X.U.; Qingzheng, W.A.N.G.; Guizhang, G.U.; Zhang, J.; Dalun, X.U. Study on the Function of Pepper Essential Oil in Endowing Flavor of Pepper-Salt Baked Shrimp. Shipin Gongye Ke-Ji. [CrossRef]
  146. de Flaviis, R.; Sacchetti, G.; Mastrocola, D. Wheat Classification According to Its Origin by an Implemented Volatile Organic Compounds Analysis. Food Chem. 2021, 341, 128217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Basile, G.; De Maio, A.C.; Catalano, A.; Ceramella, J.; Iacopetta, D.; Bonofiglio, D.; Saturnino, C.; Sinicropi, M.S. Ancient Wheat as Promising Nutraceuticals for the Prevention of Chronic and Degenerative Diseases. Curr. Med. Chem. 2023, 30, 3384–3403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Şavşatlı, Y. Identification of Volatile Compounds in Salep (Serapias vomeracea) Tubers and Effects of Harvest Time and Drying Method on Composition Variation. Ciênc. Agrotec. 2023, 47, e002223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Catalano, A. COVID-19: Could Irisin Become the Handyman Myokine of the 21st Century? Coronaviruses 2020, 1, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Zhu, A.; Luo, X. Detection of Covid-19 through a Heptanal Biomarker Using Transition Metal Doped Graphene. J. Phys. Chem. B 2022, 126, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Hu, J.; Chen, S.E.; Zhu, S.; Jia, W.; Sun, J.; Zhao, X.E.; Liu, H. 13-Plex UHPLC–MS/MS Analysis of Hexanal and Heptanal Using Multiplex Tags Chemical isotope Labeling Technology. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2020, 31, 1965–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Azorín, C.; López-Juan, A.L.; Aparisi, F.; Benedé, J.L.; Chisvert, A. Determination of Hexanal and Heptanal in Saliva Samples by an Adapted Magnetic Headspace Adsorptive Microextraction for Diagnosis of Lung Cancer. Anal. Chim. Acta 2023, 1271, 341435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Reineccius, G. Flavoring Ingredients Classified As GRAS By the Flavor Extract Manufacturers Association. In Source Book of Flavors; Reineccius, G., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1994; pp. 655–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Liu, K.; Chen, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wang, X. Isolation and Biological Activities of Decanal, Linalool, Valencene, and Octanal from Sweet Orange Oil. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, C1156–C1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ghosh, A.; Ghosh, B.; Parihar, N.; Ilaweibaphyrnai, M.; Panda, S.R.; Alexander, A.; Chella, N.; Murty, U.S.N.; Naidu, V.G.M.; Jagadeesh, K.G.; et al. Nutraceutical Prospects of Houttuynia cordata against the Infectious Viruses. Food Biosci. 2022, 50, 101977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Zhou, H.; Tao, N.; Jia, L. Antifungal Activity of Citral, Octanal and α-Terpineol against Geotrichum citri-aurantii. Food Control 2014, 37, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Duan, B.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, Z.; Liu, Z.; Tao, N. Octanal Enhances Disease Resistance in Postharvest Citrus Fruit by the Biosynthesis and Metabolism of Aromatic Amino Acids. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2024, 200, 105835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Song, M.K.; Lee, H.S.; Choi, H.S.; Shin, C.Y.; Kim, Y.J.; Park, Y.K.; Ryu, J.C. Octanal-induced Inflammatory Responses in Cells Relevant for Lung Toxicity: Expression and Release of Cytokines in A549 Human Alveolar Cells. Human Exp. Toxicol. 2014, 33, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Noordraven, L.E.; Petersen, M.A.; Van Loey, A.M.; Bredie, W.L. Flavour stability of sterilised chickpeas stored in pouches. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2021, 4, 773–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Takakura, Y.; Osanai, H.; Masuzawa, T.; Wakabayashi, H.; Nishimura, T. Characterization of the Key Aroma Compounds in Pork Soup Stock by Using an Aroma Extract Dilution Analysis. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2014, 78, 124–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Wettasinghe, M.; Vasanthan, T.; Temelli, F.; Swallow, K. Volatile Flavour Composition of Cooked By-product Blends of Chicken, Beef and Pork: A Quantitative GC–MS Investigation. Food Res. Int. 2001, 34, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Chang, H.; Wang, Y.; Xia, Q.; Pan, D.; He, J.; Zhang, H.; Cao, J. Characterization of the Physicochemical Changes and Volatile Compound Fingerprinting during the Chicken Sugar-smoking Process. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Feng, S.; Suh, J.H.; Gmitter, F.G.; Wang, Y. Differentiation between Flavors of Sweet Orange (Citrus sinensis) and Mandarin (Citrus reticulata). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Lan-Phi, N.T. Gas chromatography-–olfactometry and aroma--active components in citrus essential oils. In Citrus Essential Oils: Flavor and Fragrance; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 201–227. [Google Scholar]
  165. Boukouvalas, J.; Jean, M.A. Streamlined Biomimetic Synthesis of Paracaseolide A via Aerobic Oxidation of a 2-Silyloxyfuran. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 4248–4250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Varghese, C.P.; Murugaiyah, V.; Parasuraman, S.; Christina, A.J.M. Bioactive Phytoconstituents and Biological Activities of Polygonum minus Huds. In Bioactive Compounds in the Storage Organs of Plants; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Perkins, J.; Hayashi, T.; Peakall, R.; Flematti, G.R.; Bohman, B. The volatile chemistry of orchid pollination. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2023, 40, 819–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Mishor, E.; Amir, D.; Weiss, T.; Honigstein, D.; Weissbrod, A.; Livne, E.; Gorodisky, L.; Karagach, S.; Ravia, A.; Sobel, N. Sniffing the Human Body Volatile Hexadecanal Blocks Aggression in Men but Triggers Aggression in Women. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabg1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Jiang, K.; Huang, C.; Liu, F.; Zheng, J.; Ou, J.; Zhao, D.; Ou, S. Origin and Fate of Acrolein in Foods. Foods 2022, 11, 1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). Some Industrial Chemicals. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk for Chemicals to Humans; IARC: Lyon, France, 1994; Volume 60, p. 435.
  171. Daniali, G.; Jinap, S.; Hajeb, P.; Sanny, M. Acrylamide Formation in Vegetable Oils and Animal Fats during Heat Treatment. Food Chem. 2016, 212, 244–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Song, Y.; Ding, Z.; Peng, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, T.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Y. Acrylamide Formation and Aroma Evaluation of Fried Pepper Sauce under Different Exogenous Maillard Reaction Conditions. Food Chem. X 2022, 15, 100413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Ambaw, A.; Zheng, L.; Tambe, M.A.; Strathearn, K.E.; Acosta, G.; Hubers, S.A.; Liu, F.; Herr, S.A.; Tang, J.; Truong, A.; et al. Acrolein-mediated Neuronal Cell Death and alpha-Synuclein Aggregation: Implications for Parkinson’s Disease. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 88, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Arumugam, S.; Girish Subbiah, K.; Kemparaju, K.; Thirunavukkarasu, C. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Acrolein Promoted Hepatic Ischemia Reperfusion Injury: Therapeutic Potential of NOX2 and P38MAPK Inhibitors. J. Cell. Physiol. 2017, 233, 3244–3261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Burcham, P.C. Acrolein and Human Disease: Untangling the Knotty Exposure Scenarios Accompanying Several Diverse Disorders. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2017, 30, 145–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Hikisz, P.; Jacenik, D. The Tobacco Smoke Component, Acrolein, as a Major Culprit in Lung Diseases and Respiratory Cancers: Molecular Mechanisms of Acrolein Cytotoxic Activity. Cells 2023, 12, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Zhou, Y.; Jin, W.; Wu, Q.; Zhou, Q. Acrolein: Formation, health hazards and its controlling by dietary polyphenols. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 64, 9604–9617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Chang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, B.; Chen, Y.; Xie, J.; Song, Y.; Ding, X.; Hu, X.; Hu, X.; Yu, Q. The Role of Acrolein in Neurodegenerative Diseases and Its Protective Strategy. Foods 2022, 11, 3203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Guo, J.; Hecht, S.S. DNA damage in human oral cells induced by use of e-cigarettes. Drug Testing Anal. 2023, 15, 1189–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Li, Y.; Hecht, S.S. Carcinogenic Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke: A 2022 Update. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 165, 113179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Weerawatanakorn, M.; Wu, J.C.; Pan, M.H.; Ho, C.T. Reactivity and Stability of Selected Flavor Compounds. J. Food Drug Anal. 2015, 23, 176–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Paoli, M.; Maroselli, T.; Casanova, J.; Bighelli, A. A Fast and Reliable Method to Quantify Neral and Geranial (Citral) in Essential Oils using 1H NMR Spectroscopy. Flav. Fragr. J. 2023, 38, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Lu, W.C.; Huang, D.W.; Wang, C.C.R.; Yeh, C.H.; Tsai, J.C.; Huang, Y.T.; Li, P.H. Preparation, Characterization, and Antimicrobial Activity of Nanoemulsions Incorporating Citral Essential Oil. J. Food Drug Anal. 2018, 26, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Tak, J.; Isman, M. Metabolism of Citral, the Major Constituent of Lemongrass Oil, in the Cabbage Looper, Trichoplusia ni, and Effects of Enzyme Inhibitors on Toxicity and Metabolism. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2016, 133, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Nishijima, C.M.; Ganev, E.G.; Mazzardo-Martins, L.; Martins, D.F.; Rocha, L.R.M.; Santos, A.R.S.; Hiruma-Lima, C.A. Citral: A Monoterpene with Prophylactic and Therapeutic Anti-Nociceptive Effects in Experimental Models of Acute and Chronic Pain. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 736, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Bailly, C. Targets and Pathways Involved in the Antitumor Activity of Citral and its Stereo-isomers. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 871, 172945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Zheng, Y.; Shang, Y.; Li, M.; Li, Y.; Ouyang, W. Antifungal Activities of cis-trans Citral Isomers against Trichophyton rubrum with ERG6 as a Potential Target. Molecules 2021, 26, 4263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Song, W.; Yin, Z.; Lu, X.; Shen, D.; Dou, D. Plant Secondary Metabolite Citral Interferes with Phytophthora Capsici Virulence by Manipulating the Expression of Effector Genes. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2023, 24, 932–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Cramer, G.M.; Ford, R.A.; Hall, R.L. Estimation of Toxic Hazard—A Decision Tree Approach. Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 1976, 16, 255–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Kroes, R.; Renwick, A.G.; Feron, V.; Galli, C.L.; Gibney, M.; Greim, H.; Guy, R.H.; Lhuguenot, J.C.; van de Sandt, J.J. Application of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) to the Safety Evaluation of Cosmetic Ingredients. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2007, 45, 2533–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Api, A.M.; Belsito, D.; Botelho, D.; Bruze, M.; Burton, G.A., Jr.; Buschmann , J.; Cancellieri, M.A.; Dagli, M.L.; Date, M.; Dekant, W.; et al. RIFM fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, 4-Tricyclodecylidene Butanal, CAS Registry Number 30168-23-1. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 159, 112704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Api, A.M.; Belsito, D.; Botelho, D.; Bruze, M.; Burton, G.A., Jr.; Cancellieri, M.A.; Chon, H.; Dagli, M.L.; Date, M.; Dekant, W.; et al. RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, β,4-Dimethylcyclohex-3-ene-1-propan-1-al, CAS Registry Number 6784-13-0. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 165, 113174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Api, A.M.; Belsito, D.; Botelho, D.; Bruze, M.; Burton, G.A., Jr.; Buschmann, J.; Cancellieri, M.A.; Dagli, M.L.; Date, M.; Dekant, W.; et al. RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, 1-Methyl-4-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)cyclohex-3-ene-1-carbaldehyde, CAS registry number 52475-86-2. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 163, 113029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Api, A.M.; Belsito, D.; Botelho, D.; Bruze, M.; Burton, G.A., Jr.; Buschmann, J.; Cancellieri, M.A.; Dagli, M.L.; Date, M.; Dekant, W.; et al. RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, α,α,6,6-Tetramethylbicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene-2-propionaldehyde, CAS Registry Number 33885-52-8. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021, 153, 112364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Yu, H.Y.; Xie, T.; Xie, J.R.; Chen, C.; Ai, L.Z.; Tian, H.X. Aroma Perceptual Interactions of Benzaldehyde, Furfural, and Vanillin and their Effects on the Descriptor Intensities of Huangjiu. Food Res. Int. 2020, 129, 108808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Ramachanderan, R.; Schaefer, B. Lily-of-the-valley fragrances. Chemtexts 2019, 5, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Ohrmann, E.; Chandrasekaran, V.; Hölscher, B.; Kraft, P. On the Structure–Odor Correlation of Muguet Aldehydes: Synthesis of 3-(4′-Isobutyl-2′-methylphenyl)propanal (Nympheal) and Four Novel Derivatives from a Hagemann’s Ester. Helv. Chim. Acta 2023, 106, e202300040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Jordi, S.; Kraft, P. Crossing the Boundaries between Marine and Muguet: Discovery of Unusual Lily-of-the-Valley Odorants Devoid of Aldehyde Functions. Helvet. Chim. Acta 2018, 101, e1800048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Chung, F.Y.; Lin, Y.Z.; Huang, C.R.; Huang, K.W.; Chen, Y.F. Crosslinking Kiwifruit-derived DNA with Natural Aromatic Aldehydes Generates Membranolytic Antibacterial Nanogels. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 255, 127947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Laue, H.; Kern, S.; Badertscher, R.P.; Ellis, G.; Natsch, A. p-Alkyl-benzoyl-CoA Conjugates as Relevant Metabolites of Aromatic Aldehydes with Rat Testicular Toxicity—Studies Leading to the Design of a Safer New Fragrance Chemical. Toxicol. Sci. 2017, 160, 244–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Opgrande, J.L.; Brown, E.E.; Hesser, M.; Andrews, J. Benzaldehyde. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Verma, T.; Verma, P.; Singh, U.P. A Multi Responsive Phosphonic Acid Based Fluorescent Sensor for Sensing Fe3+, Benzaldehyde and Antibiotics. Microchem. J. 2023, 191, 108771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Pepe, R.C.; Wenninger, J.A.; McEwen, G.N., Jr. , International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary and Handbook, 9th ed.; CTFA: Washington, DC, USA, 2002; Volume 1, p. 132. [Google Scholar]
  204. Jermnak, U.; Ngernmeesri, P.; Yurayart, C.; Poapolathep, A.; Udomkusonsri, P.; Poapolathep, S.; Phaochoosak, N. A New Benzaldehyde Derivative Exhibits Antiaflatoxigenic Activity against Aspergillus flavus. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Andersen, A. Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Benzaldehyde. Int. J. Toxicol. 2006, 25 (Suppl. S1), 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Neto, L.J.L.; Ramos, A.G.B.; Freitas, T.S.; Barbosa, C.; de Sousa Júnior, D.L.; Siyadatpanah, A.; Nejat, M.; Wilairatana, P.; Coutinho, H.D.M.; da Cunha, F.A.B. Evaluation of Benzaldehyde as an Antibiotic Modulator and Its Toxic Effect against Drosophila melanogaster. Molecules 2021, 26, 5570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Kim, J.H.; Chan, K.L. Benzaldehyde Use to Protect Seeds from Foodborne Fungal Pathogens. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2022, 18, 8873–8894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Writer, C.I.R. Safety Assessment of Benzaldehyde as Used in Cosmetics. 2023. Available online: www.cir-safety.org (accessed on 18 October 2024).
  209. Yong, K.J.; Wu, T.Y.; Lee, C.B.T.L.; Lee, Z.J.; Liu, Q.; Jahim, J.M.D.; Zhou, Q.; Zhang, L. Furfural Production from Biomass Residues: Current Technologies, Challenges and Future Prospects. Biomass Bioenergy 2022, 161, 106458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Shen, Z.; Ma, X.; Ali, M.M.; Liang, J.; Du, Z. Analysis of the Evolution of Potential and Free Furfural Compounds in the Production Chain of Infant Formula and Risk Assessment. Food Chem. 2022, 368, 130814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Mehrotra, S.; Rai, P.; Sharma, S.K. A Quick and Simple Paper-based Method for Detection of Furfural and 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural in Beverages and Fruit Juices. Food Chem. 2022, 377, 131532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Bazrafshan, E.; Mohammadi, L.; NadeemZafar, M.; Dargahi, A.; Pirdadeh, F. Synthesis of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles and its Application for Photocatalytic Removal of Furfural from Aqueous Media: Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology. Arab. J. Chem. 2023, 16, 104998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Wang, H.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Ayepa, E.; Xiang, Q.; Yu, X.; Zhao, K.; Zou, L.; Gu, Y.; Li, X.; et al. Discovery of New Strains for Furfural Degradation Using Adaptive Laboratory Evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 459, 132090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Walton, N.J.; Mayer, M.J.; Arjan, N. Vanillin. Phytochemistry 2003, 63, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Jiang, W.; Chen, X.; Feng, Y.; Sun, J.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Xin, F.; Jiang, M. Current Status, Challenges, and Prospects for the Biological Production of Vanillin. Fermentation 2023, 9, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Banerjee, G.; Chattopadhyay, P. Vanillin Biotechnology: The Perspectives and Future. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Xu, L.; Liaqat, F.; Sun, J.; Khazi, M.I.; Xie, R.; Zhu, D. Advances in the Vanillin Synthesis and Biotransformation: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 189, 113905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Xu, L.; Liaqat, F.; Khazi, M.I.; Sun, J.; Zhu, D. Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents-based Green Extraction of Vanillin: Optimization, Purification, and Bioactivity Assessment. Front. Nutr. 2024, 10, 1279552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Moore, A.J.; Wickramasinghe, P.C.; Munafo, J.P., Jr. Key Odorants from Daldinia childiae. Flav. Fragr. J. 2020, 35, 722–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Xin, Y.; Peng, S.; Wei, S.; Lei, Y.; Zhang, S.; Hu, Y.; Lv, Y. Antimicrobial and Biofilm Inhibition Effects of p-Anisaldehyde against Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Food Control 2023, 154, 110021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Adewunmi, Y.; Namjilsuren, S.; Walker, W.D.; Amato, D.N.; Amato, D.V.; Mavrodi, O.V.; Patton, D.L.; Mavrodi, D.V. Antimicrobial Activity of, and Cellular Pathways Targeted by, p-Anisaldehyde and Epigallocatechin Gallate in the Opportunistic Human Pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e02482-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Che, J.X.; Chen, X.M.; Ouyang, Q.L.; Tao, N.G. p-Anisaldehyde Exerts its Antifungal Activity against Penicillium digitatum and Penicillium italicum by Disrupting the Cell Wall Integrity and Membrane Permeability. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 30, 878–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Xin, Y.; Zhang, W.; Lei, Y.; Wei, S.; Zhang, S.; Li, N.; Hu, Y.; Lv, Y. Antifungal Mechanism of p-Anisaldehyde against Aspergillus flavus Based on Transcriptome Analysis. LWT 2024, 195, 115844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Shreaz, S.; Bhatia, R.; Khan, N.; Muralidhar, S.; Basir, S.F.; Manzoor, N.; Khan, L.A. Exposure of Candida to p-Anisaldehyde Inhibits its Growth and Ergosterol Biosynthesis. J. General. App. Microbiol. 2011, 57, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Chen, X.; Zhang, X.; Meng, R.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, X.; Shi, C.; Guo, N. Efficacy of a Combination of Nisin and p-Anisaldehyde against Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control 2016, 66, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Shi, C.; Zhao, X.; Meng, R.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, G.; Guo, N. Synergistic Antimicrobial Effects of Nisin and p-Anisaldehyde on Staphylococcus aureus in Pasteurized Milk. LWT 2017, 84, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Dal-Ah, K.I.M.; Kong, K.H.; Hyun-Jeong, C.H.O.; Mi-Ran, L.E.E. Role of p-Anisaldehyde in the Differentiation of C2C12 Myoblasts. Korean J. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2023, 55, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Younes, M.; Aquilina, G.; Castle, L.; Engel, K.-H.; Fowler, P.; Fernandez, M.J.F.; Fürst, P.; Gürtler, R.; Gundert-Remy, U.; Husøy, T.; et al. Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 414 (FGE. 414): 2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde. EFSA 2021, 19, e06883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Harohally, N.V.; Cherita, C.; Bhatt, P.; Anu Appaiah, K.A. Antiaflatoxigenic and Antimicrobial Activities of Schiff Bases of 2-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde, Cinnamaldehyde, and Similar Aldehydes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 8773–8778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Rathi, N.; Harwalkar, K.; Jayashree, V.; Sharma, A.; Rao, N.N. 2-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde, an Astounding Food Flavoring Metabolite: A Review. AJPCR 2017, 10, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Gangopadhyay, M.; Das, A.K.; Sahu, R.; Saha, A.; Dey, S.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Mitra, A. Evaluation of Growth Response for Mass Production and Accumulation of 2-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde in Endangered Hemidesmus indicus by an Aeroponic System. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 172, 114072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Rodrigues, V.; Kumar, A.; Prabhu, K.N.; Pragadheesh, V.S.; Shukla, A.K.; Sundaresan, V. Adventitious Root Cultures of Decalepis salicifolia for the Production of 2-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde, a Vanillin Isomer Flavor Metabolite. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 3087–3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Andati, R.E.; Omolo, M.O.; Ndiege, I.O. Ovicidal Activity of 2-Hydroxy-4-Methoxybenzaldehyde, Derivatives and Structural Analogues on Anopheles gambiae eggs. bioRxiv 2021, 2021, 460396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Mishra, V.K.; Goswami, R.; Naidu, R.T. Establishment of In Vitro Cell Suspension Culture, Kinetics of Cell Growth, pH, Nutrient Uptake and Production of 2-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde from the Germinated Root of Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn.-An Endangered Plant. Curr. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2022, 22, 10–55003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Arunachalam, K.; Ravi, J.; Tian, X.; Shunmugiah, K.P.; Shanmugaraj, G.; Shi, C. Antibacterial Activity of 2-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde and its Possible Mechanism against Staphylococcus aureus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 134, lxad144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Li, Q.; Zhao, X.; Xie, Y.; Ren, S. 2-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde Inhibits the Growth of Aspergillus flavus via Damaging Cell Wall, Cell Membrane, Manipulating Respiration thus Creating a Promising Antifungal Effect on Corn Kernels. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 56, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Li, Q.; Wang, C.; Xiao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, Y. 2-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde, a More Effective Antifungal Aroma than Vanillin and its Derivatives against Fusarium graminearum, Destroys Cell Membranes, Inhibits DON Biosynthesis, and Performs a Promising Antifungal Effect on Wheat Grains. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1359947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  238. Ravindran, D.; Rajaiah, A.; Swasthika, R.; Balu, P.; Gopalakrishnan, A.; Krishna Kumar, A.K.; Muthusamy, S.; Malayandi, J.; Durairaj, R.; Arumugam, V.R. Evaluation of Bcr/cflA Targeted Efflux Inhibitory Potential of 2-Hydroxy-4-Methoxybenzaldehyde against Proteus mirabilis. Ind. J. Microbiol. 2024, in press. [CrossRef]
  239. Durgam, M.K.; Bodiga, V.L.; Vemuri, P.K.; Aenugu, V.R.; Bodiga, S. 2-Hydroxy-4-methoxy benzaldehyde from Hemidesmus indicus Root Extract Suppresses Toll-like rRceptor2-mediated Migration and Invasive Mechanisms in Rheumatoid Arthritis. J. Herbal Med. 2023, 42, 100820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Zviely, M. The Phenylpropanals–Floral Aromatic Aldehydes. Perf. Flav. 2012, 37, 52–55. [Google Scholar]
  241. Jin, R.; Xu, Z.; Feng, J.; Wang, M.; Yao, P.; Wu, Q.; Zhu, D. Stereocomplementary Synthesis of β-Aryl Propanamines by Enzymatic Dynamic Kinetic Resolution-Reductive Amination. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2023, 26, e202300476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Mosciano, G.; Fasano, M.; Cassidy, J.; Connelly, K.; Mazeiko, P.; Montenegro, A. Organoleptic Characteristics of Flavor Materials. Perf. Flav. 1994, 19, 53–55. [Google Scholar]
  243. Lozynskyi, A.; Karkhut, A.; Polovkovych, S.; Karpenko, O.; Holota, S.; Gzella, A.K.; Lesyk, R. 3-Phenylpropanal and Citral in the Multicomponent Synthesis of Novel Thiopyrano[2,3-d]thiazoles. Results Chem. 2022, 4, 100464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Avila, E.; Nixarlidis, C.; Shon, Y.S. Water-Soluble Pd Nanoparticles for the Anti-Markovnikov Oxidation of Allyl Benzene in Water. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Gorbachev, D.; Smith, E.; Argent, S.P.; Newton, G.N.; Lam, H.W. Synthesis of New Morphinan Opioids by TBADT-Catalyzed Photochemical Functionalization at the Carbon Skeleton. Chemistry 2022, 28, e202201478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Hareng, L.; Schuster, P.; Haake, V.; Walk, T.; Herold, M.; Laue, H.; Natsch, A. Towards the Mechanism of Spermatotoxicity of p-tert-Butyl-alpha-methylhydrocinnamic Aldehyde: Inhibition of Late Stage Ex-Vivo Spermatogenesis in Rat Seminiferous Tubule Cultures by para-tert-Butyl-Benzoic Acid. Arch. Toxicol. 2023, 97, 279–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. ECHA. European Chemicals Agency: Summary of Classification and Labeling, 3-(p-Cumenyl)propionaldehyde. 2016. Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-database/-/discli/details/84780 (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  248. ECHA Substance Information. Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.038.182 (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  249. Movalli, P.; Biesmeijer, K.; Gkotsis, G.; Alygizakis, N.; Nika, M.C.; Vasilatos, K.; Kostakis, M.; Thomaidis, N.S.; Oswald, P.; Oswaldova, M.; et al. High Resolution Mass Spectrometric Suspect Screening, Wide-scope Target Analysis of Emerging Contaminants and Determination of Legacy Pollutants in Adult Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa limosa in the Netherlands–A Pilot Study. Chemosphere 2023, 321, 138145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Goeke, A.; Kraft, P.; Laue, H.; Zou, Y.; Voirol, F. Int. Pat. Appl. WO 2014180945 A1, 13 November 2014. [Google Scholar]
  251. Goeke, A.; Kraft, P.; Lelievre, D.; Alchenberger, A.E. Discovery of Nympheal: The Definitive Muguet Aldehyde. Perfum. Flavor. 2018, 43, 25–40. [Google Scholar]
  252. West, T.F. Synthetic perfumes. Sci. Progr. (1933-) 1948, 36, 38–54. [Google Scholar]
  253. Yokowo, Y.; Matuwura, A.; Saburi, M.; Yoshikawa, S. Optical Activation of Some Perfume of Chiral Aldehydes via Enamines. J. Japan Oil Chemists’ Soc. 1981, 30, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Beghetto, V.; Matteoli, U.; Scrivanti, A.; Bertoldini, M. Asymmetric Catalysis in Fragrance Chemistry: A New Catalytic Approach to Non Racemic Cyclamen-aldehyde. Sci. Ca’ Foscari 2012, 1, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Natsch, A.; Nordone, A.; Adamson, G.M.; Laue, H. A Species Specific Metabolism Leading to Male Rat Reprotoxicity of Cyclamen Aldehyde: In Vivo and In Vitro Evaluation. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021, 153, 112243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Givaudan Health and Nutrition Hub. Available online: https://healthnutritionhub.givaudan.com/?gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjw68K4BhAuEiwAylp3khI7wkT_6bkOixr83NdfZ-HGuL8YRlhfb_ORS16-6rgB_UHtxRs7nRoCQkUQAvD_BwE (accessed on 10 June 2024).
  257. Fragrance Ingredients Compendium. Available online: https://www.iff.com/portfolio/products/fragrance-ingredients/online-compendium/ (accessed on 10 June 2024).
  258. Beghetto, V.; Scrivanti, A.; Bertoldini, M.; Aversa, M.; Zancanaro, A.; Matteoli, U. A Practical, Enantioselective Synthesis of the Fragrances Canthoxal and Silvial®, and Evaluation of their Olfactory Activity. Synthesis 2015, 47, 272–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Gil, A.; Savchuk, S.; Appolonova, S.; Nadezhdin, A.; Kakorina, E. The Composition of Nonbeverage Alcohols Consumed in Russia in 2015–2017. Rev. D’épidémiologie St. Publique 2018, 66, S355–S356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Scherer, M.; Koch, H.M.; Schütze, A.; Pluym, N.; Krnac, D.; Gilch, G.; Leibold, E.; Scherer, G. Human Metabolism and Excretion Kinetics of the Fragrance Lysmeral after a Single Oral Dosage. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2017, 220, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Bernauer, U.; Bodin, L.; Celleno, L.; Chaudhry, Q.; Coenraads, P.J.; Dusinska, M.; Ezendam, J.; Gaffet, E.; Galli, C.L.; Granum, B.; et al. SCCS Preliminary OPINION ON the Safety of Butylphenyl Methylpropional (p-BMHCA) in Cosmetic Products”-Submission II, Ref SCCS/1591/17-Preliminary Version. 2017. hal-01669154. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/68263682/SCCS_preliminary_OPINION_ON_the_safety_of_Butylphenyl_methylpropional_p_BMHCA_in_cosmetic_products_Submission_II_ref_CCS_1591_17_Preliminary_version (accessed on 18 October 2024).
  262. Armanino, N.; Charpentier, J.; Flachsmann, F.; Goeke, A.; Liniger, M.; Kraft, P. What’s Hot, What’s Not: The Trends of the Past 20 Years in the Chemistry of Odorants. Angew. Chem. 2020, 59, 16310–16344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  263. de Sá, L.D.M. Farmácia 5 de Outubro, Porto e Serviços Farmacêuticos do Hospital CUF, Porto. 2022. Available online: https://sigarra.up.pt/ffup/pt/PUB_GERAL.PUB_VIEW?pi_pub_base_id=588952 (accessed on 18 October 2024).
  264. Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1902 of 29 October 2021 Amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as Regards the Use in Cosmetic Products of Certain Substances Classified as Carcinogenic. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/1902/oj (accessed on 18 October 2024).
  265. Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1410 of 2 August 2017 Amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Cosmetic Products. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017R1410 (accessed on 18 October 2024).
  266. UNION, P. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Available online: https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2016-11/cosmetic_1223_2009_regulation_en_0.pdf (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  267. European Commission. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1182 of 19 May 2020 Amending, for the Purposes of Its Adaptation to Technical and Scientific Progress, Part 3 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) no 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32020R1182 (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  268. Soriano, L.F.; Soriano, S.K.; Buckley, D.A. Ironing water: An under-recognized source of contact allergens. Contact Dermat. 2023, 88, 75–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  269. Da Lycia a Nivea, Passando per Infasil e Palmolive, Ecco Tutti i Prodotti Richiamati per la Presenza di Sostanza Vietata (LISTA AGGIORNATA). Available online: https://www.greenme.it/lifestyle/sai-cosa-compri/da-lycia-a-nivea-passando-per-infasil-e-palmolive-ecco-tutti-i-prodotti-richiamati-per-la-presenza-di-sostanza-vietata-lista-aggiornata/ (accessed on 18 October 2024).
  270. LIlial, Nuovi Ritiri: L’Elenco Aggiornato con Oltre 130 Prodotti Nocivi Bloccati. Available online: https://ilsalvagente.it/2023/10/15/lilial-nuovi-ritiri-lelenco-aggiornato-con-oltre-130-prodotti-nocivi-bloccati/ (accessed on 18 October 2024).
  271. Safety Gate: The EU Rapid Alert System for Dangerous Non-Food Products. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/safety-gate-alerts/screen/search (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  272. Pigłowski, M. Notifications in European Rapid Alert system for dangerous products (RAPEX). In Safety and Reliability of Systems and Processes. Summer Safety and Reliability Seminar 2023; Gdynia Maritime University: Gdynia, Poland, 2023; pp. 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Ferreira, M.; Matos, A.; Couras, A.; Marto, J.; Ribeiro, H. Overview of Cosmetic Regulatory Frameworks around the World. Cosmetics 2022, 9, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Canada.ca. Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist: Prohibited and Restricted Ingredients. 15 January 2020. Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/consumer-product-safety/cosmetics/cosmetic-ingredient-hotlist-prohibited-restricted-ingredients.html (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  275. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Prohibited & Restricted Ingredients in Cosmetics. 25 February 2022. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-laws-regulations/prohibited-restricted-ingredients-cosmetics (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  276. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Product Testing of Cosmetics. 25 February 2022. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-science-research/product-testing-cosmetics (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  277. Cosmetic Ingredient Review. About the Cosmetic Ingredient Review. Available online: https://www.cir-safety.org/about (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  278. Sinicropi, M.S.; Iacopetta, D.; Ceramella, J.; Catalano, A.; Mariconda, A.; Pellegrino, M.; Saturnino, C.; Longo, P.; Aquaro, S. Triclosan: A Small Molecule with Controversial Roles. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. ECHA Disseminated Dossier. 2-(4-tert-Butylbenzyl)propionaldehyde. 2023. Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/it/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.001.173 (accessed on 7 March 2024).
  280. ECHA. Substance Infocard: 2-(4-tert-Butylbenzyl)propionaldehyde. 2023. Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.001.173 (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  281. ECHA. European Chemicals Agency: REACH Registration Dossier, 3-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)-2-Methylpropanal. 2016. Available online: http://echa.europa.eu/registration-dossier/-/registered-dossier/13572 (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  282. Laue, H.; Badertscher, R.P.; Hostettler, L.; Weiner-Sekiya, Y.; Haupt, T.; Nordone, A.; Adamson, G.M.; Natsch, A. Benzoyl-CoA Conjugate Accumulation as an Initiating Event for Male Reprotoxic Effects in the Rat? Structure–Activity Analysis, Species Specificity, and In vivo Relevance. Arch. Toxicol. 2020, 94, 4115–4129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Hunter, C.G.; Chambers, P.L.; Stevenson, D.E. Studies on the Oral Toxicity of p-tert-Butyl Benzoic Acid in Rats. Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 1965, 3, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  284. Whorton, M.D.; Stubbs, H.A.; Obrinsky, A.; Milby, T.H. Testicular Function of Men Occupationally exposed to para-tertiary Butyl Benzoic Acid. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 1981, 7, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Bernard, A. Dermal exposure to hazardous chemicals in baby diapers: A re-evaluation of the quantitative health risk assessment conducted by the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Api, A.M.; Belsito, D.; Biserta, S.; Botelho, D.; Bruze, M.; Burton, G.A.; Buschmann, J.; Cancellieri, M.A.; Dagli, M.L.; Date, M.; et al. RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, p-t-butyl-α-methylhydrocinnamic aldehyde, CAS Registry Number 80-54-6. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 141, 111430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Jablonská, E.; Míchal, Z.; Křížkovská, B.; Strnad, O.; Tran, V.N.; Žalmanová, T.; Petr, J.; Lipov, J.; Viktorová, J. Toxicological Investigation of Lilial. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 18536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  288. Ceramella, J.; Iacopetta, D.; Franchini, A.; De Luca, M.; Saturnino, C.; Andreu, I.; Sinicropi, M.S.; Catalano, A. A Look at the Importance of Chirality in Drug Activity: Some Significative Examples. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 10909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Murawski, A.; Fiedler, N.; Schmied-Tobies, M.I.H.; Rucic, E.; Schwedler, G.; Stoeckelhuber, M.; Scherer, G.; Pluym, N.; Scherer, M.; Kolossa-Gehring, M. Metabolites of the Fragrance 2-(4-tert-butylbenzyl)propionaldehyde (Lysmeral) in Urine of Children and Adolescents in Germany—Human Biomonitoring Results of the German Environmental Survey 2014–2017 (GerES V). Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2020, 229, 113594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  290. Fichter, S.C.; Groth, K.; Fiedler, N.; Kolossa-Gehring, M.; Dębiak, M.; INGER Study Group. Lysmeral Exposure in Children and Adolescences Participating in the German Environmental Survey (2012–2015): Integrating Sex/Gender into Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 17072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  291. Yan, G.; Rose, J.; Ellison, C.; Mudd, A.M.; Zhang, X.; Wu, S. Refine and Strengthen SAR-Based Read-Across by Considering Bioactivation and Modes of Action. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2023, 36, 1532–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Song, Y.T.; Li, S.S.; Chao, C.Y.; Guo, S.; Chen, G.Z.; Wang, S.X.; Zhang, M.X.; Yin, Y.L.; Li, P. Floralozone Regulates MiR-7a-5p Expression through AMPKα2 Activation to Improve Cognitive Dysfunction in Vascular Dementia. Exp. Neurol. 2024, 376, 114748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Huang, N.; Qiu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, T.; Xue, X.; Song, P.; Xu, J.; Fu, Y.; Sun, R.; Yin, Y.; et al. Floralozone Protects Endothelial Function in Atherosclerosis by Ameliorating NHE1. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2021, 53, 1310–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Xu, J.; Zhang, W.; Dong, J.; Cao, L.; Huang, Z. A New Potential Strategy for Treatment of Ischemic Stroke: Targeting TRPM2–NMDAR Association. Neurosci. Bull. 2023, 39, 703–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Weng, X.; Ho, C.T.; Lu, M. The biological fate, health benefits and novel delivery strategies for cinnamaldehyde. Food Funct. 2024, 15, 6217–6231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Nussbaum, L.; Hogea, L.M.; Călina, D.; Andreescu, N.; Grădinaru, R.; Ștefănescu, R.; Puiu, M. Modern Treatment Approaches in Psychoses. Pharmacogenetic, neuroimagistic and Clinical Implications. Farmacia 2017, 65, 75–81. [Google Scholar]
  297. Khare, P.; Jagtap, S.; Jain, Y.; Baboota, R.K.; Mangal, P.; Boparai, R.K.; Bhutani, K.K.; Sharma, S.S.; Premkumar, L.S.; Kondepudi, K.K.; et al. Cinnamaldehyde Supplementation Prevents Fasting-induced Hyperphagia, Lipid Accumulation, and Inflammation in High-fat Diet-fed Mice. Biofactors 2016, 2, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  298. Hancı, D.; Altun, H.; Çetinkaya, E.A.; Muluk, N.B.; Cengiz, B.P.; Cingi, C. Cinnamaldehyde Is an Effective Anti-inflammatory Agent for Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis in a Rat Model. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2016, 84, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  299. Nakhaee, S.; Kooshki, A.; Hormozi, A.; Akbari, A.; Mehrpour, O.; Farrokhfall, K. Cinnamon and Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies. Nutr. Neurosci. 2024, 27, 132–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  300. He, Z.; Huang, Z.; Jiang, W.; Zhou, W. Antimicrobial Activity of Cinnamaldehyde on Streptococcus mutans Biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Iacopetta, D.; Ceramella, J.; Catalano, A.; D’Amato, A.; Lauria, G.; Saturnino, C.; Andreu, I.; Longo, P.; Sinicropi, M.S. Diarylureas: New Promising Small Molecules against Streptococcus mutans for the Treatment of Dental Caries. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Banerjee, S.; Banerjee, S. Anticancer Potential and Molecular Mechanisms of Cinnamaldehyde and Its Congeners Present in the Cinnamon Plant. Physiologia 2023, 3, 173–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Vezzani, B.; Perrone, M.; Carinci, M.; Palumbo, L.; Tombolato, A.; Tombolato, D.; Daminato, C.; Gentili, V.; Rizzo, R.; Campo, G.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infection as a Model to Study the Effect of Cinnamaldehyde as Adjuvant Therapy for Viral Pneumonia. J. Inflamm. 2023, 20, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Catalano, A.; Iacopetta, D.; Ceramella, J.; Maio, A.C.; Basile, G.; Giuzio, F.; Bonomo, M.G.; Aquaro, S.; Walsh, T.J.; Sinicropi, M.S.; et al. Are Nutraceuticals Effective in COVID-19 and Post-COVID Prevention and Treatment? Foods 2022, 11, 2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Guo, X.R.; Zhang, X.G.; Wang, G.S.; Wang, J.; Liu, X.J.; Deng, J.H. Effect of Cinnamaldehyde on Systemic Candida albicans Infection in Mice. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Pereira, W.; Pereira, C.; Assunção, R.; da Silva, I.; Rego, F.; Alves, L.; Santos, J.; Nogueira, F.; Zagmignan, A.; Thomsen, T.; et al. New Insights into the Antimicrobial Action of Cinnamaldehyde towards Escherichia coli and Its Effects on Intestinal Colonization of Mice. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Topa, S.H.; Palombo, E.A.; Kingshott, P.; Blackall, L.L. Activity of Cinnamaldehyde on Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Susceptibility to Antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  308. Usai, F.; Di Sotto, A. Trans-cinnamaldehyde as a Novel Candidate to Overcome Bacterial Resistance: An Overview of In Vitro Studies. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  309. Catalano, A.; Iacopetta, D.; Ceramella, J.; Pellegrino, M.; Giuzio, F.; Marra, M.; Rosano, C.; Saturnino, C.; Sinicropi, M.S.; Aquaro, S. Antibiotic-Resistant ESKAPE Pathogens and COVID-19: The Pandemic beyond the Pandemic. Viruses 2023, 15, 1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  310. Friedman, M. Chemistry, Antimicrobial Mechanisms, and Antibiotic Activities of Cinnamaldehyde against Pathogenic Bacteria in Animal Feeds and Human Foods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 10406–10423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Shreaz, S.; Wani, W.A.; Behbehani, J.M.; Raja, V.; Irshad; Karched, M.; Ali, I.; Siddiqi, W.A.; Hun, L.T. Cinnamaldehyde and its derivatives, a novel class of antifungal agents. Fitoterapia 2016, 112, 116–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Honma, M.; Yamada, M.; Yasui, M.; Horibata, K.; Sugiyama, K.; Masumura, K. In Vivo and in Vitro Mutagenicity of Perillaldehyde and Cinnamaldehyde. Genes Environ. 2021, 43, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Alves, D.D.N.; Martins, R.X.; Ferreira, E.D.S.; Alves, A.F.; Andrade, J.C.D.; Batista, T.M.; Lazarini, J.G.; Amorim, L.S.; Rosalen, P.M.; Castro, R.D.D. Toxicological Parameters of a Formulation Containing Cinnamaldehyde for Use in Treatment of oral fungal infections: An In Vivo Study. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 2305695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Na, M.; O’Brien, D.; Lavelle, M.; Lee, I.; Gerberick, G.F.; Api, A.M. Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients. Dermatitis 2022, 33, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Panico, A.; Serio, F.; Bagordo, F.; Grassi, T.; Idolo, A.; De Giorgi, M.; Guido, M.; Congedo, M.; De Donno, A. Skin safety and health prevention: An overview of chemicals in cosmetic products. J. Prev. Med. Hyg. 2019, 60, E50–E57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Velambath, K.B.; Mali, S.N.; Pratap, A.P. Greener Synthesis of Jasminaldehyde via Cross Aldol Condensation Reaction Using Recyclable Phase Transfer Catalysis and its Cosmetic Application. Lett. Appl. NanoBioSci. 2023, 12, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Meng, Y.; Fang, G.; Hu, Y.; Qin, Y.; Xu, R.; Yang, F.; Lei, J.; Zhang, C. Study on the Effect of Different Aldehyde Modifiers on the Fume Suppression Effect, Mechanism and Road Performance of SBS Modified Asphalt. Sci. Tot. Environ. 2024, 912, 169162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  318. Pacholczyk-Sienicka, B.; Ciepielowski, G.; Albrecht, Ł. The First Application of 1H NMR Spectroscopy for the Assessment of the Authenticity of Perfumes. Molecules 2021, 26, 3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. EFSA. Statement of the Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) on List of Alpha, Beta-unsaturated Aldehydes and Ketones Representative of FGE.19 Substances for Genotoxicity Testing. EFSA J. 2008, 910, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  320. Lu, J.; Zeng, X.; Feng, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, F.; Guan, Z.; Chen, T.; Wei, F. Inhibitory Effects of Jasminum grandiflorum L. Essential Oil on Lipopolysaccharide-induced Microglia Activation-integrated Characteristic Analysis of Volatile Compounds, Network Pharmacology, and BV-2 Cell. Front. Pharmacol. 2023, 14, 1180618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  321. Lee, I.; Ji, K. Identification of Combinations of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in Household Chemical Products that Require Mixture Toxicity Testing. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 240, 113677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Matveychuk, D.; Dursun, S.M.; Wood, P.L.; Baker, G.B. Reactive Aldehydes and Neurodegenerative Disorders. Klin. Psikofarmakol. Bülteni Bull. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2016, 21, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Chen, C.; Lu, J.; Peng, W.; Mak, M.S.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, S.; Hou, J.; Zhou, X.; Xin, W.; et al. Acrolein, an Endogenous Aldehyde Induces Alzheimer’s Disease-like Pathologies in Mice: A New Sporadic AD Animal Model. Pharmacol. Res. 2022, 175, 106003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  324. Sanotra, M.R.; Kao, S.H.; Lee, C.K.; Hsu, C.H.; Huang, W.C.; Chang, T.C.; Tu, F.Y.; Hsu, I.U.; Lin, Y.F. Acrolein Adducts and Responding Autoantibodies Correlate with Metabolic Disturbance in Alzheimer’s Disease. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2023, 15, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  325. Sutaria, S.R.; Gori, S.S.; Morris, J.D.; Xie, Z.; Fu, X.-A.; Nantz, M.H. Lipid Peroxidation Produces a Diverse Mixture of Saturated and Unsaturated Aldehydes in Exhaled Breath That Can Serve as Biomarkers of Lung Cancer—A Review. Metabolites 2022, 12, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Iacopetta, D.; Ceramella, J.; Baldino, N.; Sinicropi, M.S.; Catalano, A. Targeting Breast Cancer: An Overlook on Current Strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  327. Vijayraghavan, S.; Saini, N. Aldehyde-Associated Mutagenesis-Current State of Knowledge. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2023, 36, 983–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  328. Fang, Y.; Zhang, J. The Cumulative and Single Effect of 12 Aldehydes Concentrations on Cardiovascular Diseases: An Analysis Based on Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression and Weighted Logistic Regression. Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2024, 25, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  329. Iacopetta, D.; Ceramella, J.; Catalano, A.; Scali, E.; Scumaci, D.; Pellegrino, M.; Aquaro, S.; Saturnino, C.; Sinicropi, M.S. Impact of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes on the Phase I Metabolism of Drugs. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 6045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Jackson, B.; Brocker, C.; Thompson, D.C.; Black, W.; Vasiliou, K.; Nebert, D.W.; Vasiliou, V. Update on the Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Gene (ALDH) Superfamily. Hum. Genom. 2011, 5, 283–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Marchitti, S.A.; Brocker, C.; Stagos, D.; Vasiliou, V. Non-P450 Aldehyde Oxidizing Enzymes: The Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Superfamily. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2008, 4, 697–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Zhang, J.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, X.; Pang, J.; Pan, C.; Wang, J.; Wei, S.; Yu, X.; Zhang, C.; Chen, Y.; et al. The Role of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2 in Cardiovascular Disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2023, 20, 495–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  333. Somma, S.; Reverchon, E.; Baldino, L. Water Purification of Classical and Emerging Organic Pollutants: An Extensive Review. ChemEngineering 2021, 5, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Batsika, C.S.; Koutsilieris, C.; Koutoulogenis, G.S.; Kokotou, M.G.; Kokotos, C.G.; Kokotos, G. Light-promoted Oxidation of Aldehydes to Carboxylic Acids under Aerobic and Photocatalyst-free Conditions. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 6224–6231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  335. Zhang, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Cai, H.; He, S.; Shan, Q.; Zhao, H.; Chen, Y.; Wang, B. Catalyst-free Aerobic Oxidation of Aldehydes into Acids in Water under Mild Conditions. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 5708–5713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  336. Peng, W.X.; Yue, X.; Chen, H.; Ma, N.L.; Quan, Z.; Yu, Q.; Wei, Z.; Guan, R.; Lam, S.S.; Rinklebe, J.; et al. A Review of Plants Formaldehyde Metabolism: Implications for Hazardous Emissions and Phytoremediation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 436, 129304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Ono, Y.; Sekiguchi, K.; Sankoda, K.; Nii, S.; Namiki, N. Improved Ultrasonic Degradation of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Aldehydes in Water by Combined Use of Atomization and UV Irradiation onto the Mist Surface. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019, 60, 104766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  338. Talaiekhozani, A.; Salari, M.; Talaei, M.R.; Bagheri, M.; Eskandari, Z. Formaldehyde Removal from Wastewater and Air by Using UV, Ferrate(VI) and Uv/Ferrate(VI). J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 184, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  339. Wang, M.M.; Fan, B.M.; Wen, B.Y.; Jiang, C. Experimental and Theoretical Studies on the Removal Mechanism of Formaldehyde from Water by Mesoporous Calcium Silicate. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2020, 63, 2098–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  340. Salehi, E.; Shafie, M. Adsorptive Removal of Acetaldehyde from Water Using Strong Anionic Resins Pretreated with Bisulfite: An Efficient Method for Spent Process Water Recycling in Petrochemical Industry. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 33, 101025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Zhu, P.; Chen, X.; Roberts, C.G. Method of Use for Aldehyde Removal (US7041220 B2). 2006. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7041220B2/en (accessed on 18 October 2024).
  342. Adeniyi, A.A.; Adeniyi, J.N.; Olumayede, E.G. The Theoretical Study of the Oxidation Reaction of Hydroxyl Radical for the Removal of Volatile Organic Aliphatic and Aromatic Aldehydes from the Atmosphere. Struct. Chem. 2023, 34, 1355–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  343. Kim, K.J.; Khalekuzzaman, M.; Suh, J.N.; Kim, H.J.; Shagol, C.; Kim, H.-H.; Kim, H.J. Phytoremediation of Volatile Organic Compounds by Indoor Plants: A Review. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2018, 59, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  344. Faungnawakij, K.; Sano, N.; Yamamoto, D.; Kanki, T.; Charinpanitkul, T.; Tanthapanichakoon, W. Removal of Acetaldehyde in Air Using a Wetted—Wall Corona Discharge Reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2004, 103, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  345. Sung, M.; Kato, S.; Kawanami, F.; Sudo, M. Evaluation of an Air-cleaning Unit Having Photocatalytic Sheets to Remove Acetaldehyde from Indoor Air. Build. Environ. 2010, 45, 2002–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  346. Peng, S.; Deng, Y.; Li, W.; Chen, J.; Liuac, H.; Chen, Y. Aminated Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for the Removal of Low-concentration Malodorous Aldehyde Gases. Environ. Sci. Nano 2018, 5, 2663–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  347. Wu, T.-C.; Peng, C.-Y.; Hsieh, H.-M.; Pan, C.-H.; Wu, M.-T.; Lin, P.-C.; Wu, C.-F.; Hsieh, T.-J. Reduction of Aldehyde Emission and Attribution of Environment Burden in Cooking Fumes from Food Stalls Using a Novel Fume Collector. Environ. Res. 2021, 195, 110815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  348. Vikrant, K.; Qu, Y.; Szulejko, J.E.; Kumar, V.; Vellingiri, K.; Boukhvalov, D.W.; Kim, T.; Kim, K.H. Utilization of Metal–organic Frameworks for the Adsorptive Removal of an Aliphatic Aldehyde Mixture in the Gas Phase. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 8330–8343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  349. Jamshidi, A.; Hajizadeh, Y.; Amin, M.M.; Kiani, G.; Haidari, R.; Falahi-Nejad, K.; Parseh, I. Biofiltration of Formaldehyde, Acetaldehyde, and Acrolein from Polluted Airstreams Using a Biofilter. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2018, 93, 1328–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sources and toxicity of aldehydes.
Figure 1. Sources and toxicity of aldehydes.
Organics 05 00021 g001
Table 1. Structure of the most common aliphatic aldehydes.
Table 1. Structure of the most common aliphatic aldehydes.
StructureFormulaCAS NumberName
Organics 05 00021 i001HCOH
CH2O
[50-00-0]Formaldehyde (or methanal)
Organics 05 00021 i002C2H3OH
C2H4O
[75-07-0]Acetaldehyde (or ethanal)
Organics 05 00021 i003C4H7OH
C4H8O
[123-72-8]n-Butanal (or n-butyraldehyde)
Organics 05 00021 i004C4H7OH
C4H8O
[78-84-2]i-Butanal or i-butyraldehyde or 2-methylpropanal
Organics 05 00021 i005C5H9OH
C5H10O
[96-17-3]2-Methylbutanal
Organics 05 00021 i006C5H9OH
C5H10O
[590-86-3]3-Methylbutanal or isovaleraldehyde
Organics 05 00021 i007C5H9OH
C5H10O
[110-62-3]Pentanal or valeraldehyde
Organics 05 00021 i008C6H11OH
C6H12O
[66-25-1]Hexanal or caproaldehyde or caproic aldehyde or capraldehyde or capronaldehyde
Organics 05 00021 i009C7H13OH
C7H14O
[111-71-7]Heptanal (or enanthaldehyde)
Organics 05 00021 i010C8H15OH
C8H16O
[124-13-0]Octanal (or caprylaldehyde)
Organics 05 00021 i011C9H17OH
C9H18O
[124-19-6]Nonanal (or pelargonaldehyde)
Organics 05 00021 i012C10H19OH
C10H20O
[112-31-2]Decanal (or caprinaldehyde)
Organics 05 00021 i013C11H21OH
C11H22O
[112-44-7]Undecanal
Organics 05 00021 i014C12H21OH
C12H22O
[112-54-9]Dodecanal (or lauraldehyde or lauric aldehyde)
Organics 05 00021 i015C13H23OH
C13H24O
[10486-19-8]Tridecanal
Organics 05 00021 i016C14H25OH
C14H26O
[124-25-4]Tetradecanal (or myristyl aldehyde)
Organics 05 00021 i017C16H29OH
C16H30O
[629-80-1]Hexadecanal
Organics 05 00021 i018C3H2OH
C3H3O
[107-02-8]Acrolein
Organics 05 00021 i019C10H15OH
C10H16O
[141-27-5]Geranial or Z-citral or cis-citral or citral α or citral A
Organics 05 00021 i020C10H15OH
C10H16O
[106-26-3]Neral or E-citral or trans-citral or citral β or citral B
Table 2. Structure of the most common aromatic aldehydes.
Table 2. Structure of the most common aromatic aldehydes.
StructureName Acronym and Trade Name
Organics 05 00021 i021Benzaldehyde[588-68-1]
Organics 05 00021 i022Furfural
2-Furaldehyde
Furan-2-carboxaldehyde
Pyromucic aldehyde
[98-01-1]
Organics 05 00021 i0234-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde Vanillin[121-33-5]
Organics 05 00021 i0244-Methoxybenzaldehyde
Anisaldehyde
para-anisaldehyde,
p-anisaldehyde
[123-11-5]
Organics 05 00021 i0252-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzaldehyde[673-22-3]HMB, HMBA
Organics 05 00021 i0262-Phenylpropanal[93-53-8]
Organics 05 00021 i0273-Phenylpropanal[104-53-0]
Organics 05 00021 i0283-(4-Isopropylphenyl)propanal
3-(p-Cumenyl)propionaldehyde
[7775-00-0]PHCA
Organics 05 00021 i0293-(4-tert–Butylphenyl)propanal[18127-01-0]BHCA
Bourgeonal
Lilional
Isolilial
Organics 05 00021 i0303-(4-Isobutyl-2-methylphenyl)propanal[1637294-12-2]Nympheal
Organics 05 00021 i0313-(4-Isopropylphenyl)-2-methylpropanal
Cyclamen aldehyde
Cyclamal
3-p-Cumenyl-2-methylpropionaldehyde
[103-95-7]PMHCA
CPA
Floral
Organics 05 00021 i0323-(4-Isobutylphenyl)-2-methylpropanal
iso-Butyl-α-methylhydrocinnamic aldehyde
[6658-48-6]iBMHCA
Silvial®
Organics 05 00021 i0332-(4-tert-Butylbenzyl)propionaldehyde.
p-t-Butyl-α-methylhydrocinnamic aldehyde
[80-54-6]: (RS)
[75166-30-2]: (S)-isomer
[75166-31-3]: (R)-isomer
BMHCA
Lilial,
Lismeral
Organics 05 00021 i0343-(4-Ethylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylpropanal
Ethyl-α-dimethylhydrocnamicaldehyde
[67634-15-5]Floralozone Florone
Organics 05 00021 i035Cinnamaldehyde,
Cinnamic aldehyde
Cinnamal
[14371-10-9]: trans
[57194-69-1]: cis
Organics 05 00021 i036Amyl cinnamal,
Amyl cinnamaldehyde
Jasminaldehyde
[122-40-7]
Organics 05 00021 i037α-Hexylcinnamaldehyde[101-86-0]HCA
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Catalano, A.; Mariconda, A.; D’Amato, A.; Iacopetta, D.; Ceramella, J.; Marra, M.; Saturnino, C.; Sinicropi, M.S.; Longo, P. Aldehydes: What We Should Know About Them. Organics 2024, 5, 395-428. https://doi.org/10.3390/org5040021

AMA Style

Catalano A, Mariconda A, D’Amato A, Iacopetta D, Ceramella J, Marra M, Saturnino C, Sinicropi MS, Longo P. Aldehydes: What We Should Know About Them. Organics. 2024; 5(4):395-428. https://doi.org/10.3390/org5040021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Catalano, Alessia, Annaluisa Mariconda, Assunta D’Amato, Domenico Iacopetta, Jessica Ceramella, Maria Marra, Carmela Saturnino, Maria Stefania Sinicropi, and Pasquale Longo. 2024. "Aldehydes: What We Should Know About Them" Organics 5, no. 4: 395-428. https://doi.org/10.3390/org5040021

APA Style

Catalano, A., Mariconda, A., D’Amato, A., Iacopetta, D., Ceramella, J., Marra, M., Saturnino, C., Sinicropi, M. S., & Longo, P. (2024). Aldehydes: What We Should Know About Them. Organics, 5(4), 395-428. https://doi.org/10.3390/org5040021

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop