Previous Issue
Volume 6, September
 
 

Transplantology, Volume 6, Issue 4 (December 2025) – 2 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 531 KB  
Article
Should Early Hyperglycemia Be Considered a Risk Factor for Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus? Findings from a Retrospective Cohort Study in Kidney Transplant Recipients Without Diabetes Mellitus Prior to Transplant
by Rachel B. Allen, Emily Stevenson, April L. Goley, Bonnie Alexander, Joanna Ma, Taylor B. Raiger, Mary M. Chandran and Kristen R. Szempruch
Transplantology 2025, 6(4), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/transplantology6040030 - 11 Oct 2025
Viewed by 119
Abstract
Background: Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a complication of kidney transplantation, but the impact of early hyperglycemia (EH) remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the incidence of PTDM in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who experienced EH compared to those who do not [...] Read more.
Background: Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a complication of kidney transplantation, but the impact of early hyperglycemia (EH) remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the incidence of PTDM in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who experienced EH compared to those who do not at 6 months post-transplant. Methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted in adults who underwent kidney transplantation from 1 January 2019 to 25 May 2022. KTRs who developed EH were compared against those who did not. Results: The primary outcome was the difference in incidence of PTDM at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included rehospitalizations and infections within 6 months and PTDM, renal function, cardiovascular events, and graft and patient survival within 12 months. Two hundred and seventy-nine KTRs (EH, n = 204 vs. comparator, n = 75) were included. There were higher incidences of PTDM in the EH group compared to the comparator group at 6 months (11% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.012) and 12 months post-transplant (18.5% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.007). KTRs with EH had 8.9 times greater odds of developing PTDM (OR 8.9; 95% 1.2–67.3, p = 0.03) at 6 months. There was no significant difference found in other secondary outcomes. Conclusions: KTRs with EH had an increased incidence of developing PTDM. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2593 KB  
Case Report
Successful Experience of Managing Resistant Antibody-Mediated Cardiac Allograft Rejection with Extracorporeal Photopheresis
by Lubov Korneva, Yulia Sazonova, Maria Bortsova, Maria Simonenko, Georgii Baratashvili, Olga Kalinina, Ekaterina Zaikova, Darina Sambur, Alexey Golovkin and Petr Fedotov
Transplantology 2025, 6(4), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/transplantology6040029 - 5 Oct 2025
Viewed by 256
Abstract
Background/Clinical Significance: Development of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of allograft is one of the leading causes of mortality in heart-transplant recipients; however, the standard therapy does not always resolve severe forms of rejection. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a method of immunomodulatory therapy [...] Read more.
Background/Clinical Significance: Development of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of allograft is one of the leading causes of mortality in heart-transplant recipients; however, the standard therapy does not always resolve severe forms of rejection. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a method of immunomodulatory therapy that involves separating a patient’s white blood cells and treating them with a photosensitizer and ultraviolet A irradiation. Case Presentation: An 18-year-old female patient was urgently hospitalized with complaints of shortness of breath. She had undergone heart-transplant surgery 9 months before due to congenital heart disease restrictive cardiomyopathy, complicated with end-stage chronic heart failure. During the admission she admitted that for 3 weeks she discontinued tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. AMR3 and CAV were verified. Conclusions: The use of standard approaches in the treatment of acute AMR is not always able to suppress an expressed immune reaction against the cardiac allograft, which leads to disruption of its function and rejection in the early or long-term follow-up. The inclusion of ECP in the treatment regimen allowed us to stabilize the patient’s condition and achieve regression in the severity of the AMR. It is believed that an important role in this was played by the activity of the immune system, which we assessed by changing the profile of cytokines, chemokines, and other growth factors. Thus, ECP demonstrated its effectiveness in the treatment of AMR of the cardiac allograft, with a change in the severity of the cytokine storm, as well as with an increase in the contribution of cytokines associated with the Th17 response. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Transplant Immunology and Immunosuppressive Drugs)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop