Next Article in Journal
Current Updates in Bleomycin-Based Electrochemotherapy for Deep-Seated Soft-Tissue Tumors
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrochemical Properties of Sputtered Ruthenium Oxide Neural Stimulation and Recording Electrodes
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Physiochemical Impact of Organic Molecule L-Lysine on Ammonium Dihydrogen Phosphate Single Crystal for Optoelectronics Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Progression and Opportunities of Polysaccharide Assisted Bio-Electrolyte Membranes for Rechargeable Charge Storage and Conversion Devices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Electrochemical Oxidation Profile of Anthocyanin Keracyanin on Glassy and Screen-Printed Carbon Electrodes

Unit of Analytical Chemistry (UAC), Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Sohag University, Sohag 82524, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electrochem 2023, 4(2), 273-281; https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem4020018
Submission received: 11 April 2023 / Revised: 27 April 2023 / Accepted: 28 April 2023 / Published: 6 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Electrochemistry)

Abstract

:
A study of keracyanin chloride (KC) electrochemical behavior in an aqueous buffer solution using screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCEs) and glassy carbon electrodes (GCEs) was performed. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and square-wave voltammetry (SWV) were used to analyze the electrochemical response of KC under studied conditions. A clear redox wave was observed for KC, primarily due to the oxidation of the catechol 3′,4′-dihydroxyl group of its ring B, with a minor redox wave from oxidation of the hydroxyl groups in ring A. Compared to GCEs, using modified SPCEs resulted in two-fold amplification in the electrochemical oxidation signal of KC. Using SPCEs as a working electrode could provide high sensitivity in the quantification of KC and the ability to gauge KC quantification to significantly lower detection limits.

1. Introduction

Anthocyanins are pigments found in the vacuoles of higher plants that are water-soluble and biologically active. In fruits and vegetables, legumes, and cereals, anthocyanin pigments are thought to be the most abundant water-soluble pigments [1,2]. Recent epidemiological studies suggest that eating fruits and vegetables regularly reduces the risk of aging-associated chronic diseases [3,4,5]. In addition to their many health benefits [6,7,8], anthocyanins are antioxidant, antitumor, antiradical, antimutagenic, antiproliferative, antiapoptotic, and nitric oxide-inhibitory [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Anthocyanins are flavonoids with different structural characteristics, such as the number and nature of hydroxyl groups, the degree of methylation of -OH groups, and sugar attachments [16].
Anthocyanin keracyanin chloride has significant antioxidant properties due to the breakdown of the O–H bonds attached to the aromatic ring (not the glycoside OH). Researchers have demonstrated that anthocyanins with a lower oxidation potential and are more efficient at scavenging radicals [17,18]. Antioxidant capacity and electrochemical behavior have a direct relationship: the lower the oxidation potential, the greater the antioxidant capacity [19]. A voltammetric signal at low anodic potentials indicates the presence of polyphenolic compounds with high antioxidant capabilities, while an oxidation signal at high potentials indicates the presence of polyphenolic compounds with low antioxidant capacities [20]. Studies involving voltammetric measurements of fruits are rare, and only those involving blackberries and raspberries were found [21,22]. The anthocyanin content and radical scavenging capacity of non-Vitis vinifera grapes were determined using spectrophotometry, HPLC with electrochemical detection, and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization [23]. Electrochemical sensors derived from sewage sludge were used to detect anthocyanin in berry fruits [24]. Anthocyanin contents and the antioxidant capacity of grapes were measured using screen-printed carbon electrodes modified with single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT-SPCE) [25]. As a result, it is necessarily better to understand the electrochemical properties of anthocyanin keracyanin chloride to appreciate its antioxidant capacity fully. The B ring is reported to be more oxidizable than the A ring (Figure 1) [26]. This study aims to examine the electrochemical oxidation behavior of keracyanin chloride since this behavior has never been studied before. We used different electrode materials, including glassy carbon and screen-printed electrodes, to investigate keracyanin chloride’s electrochemical oxidation behavior.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Solutions

Merck supplied boric acid 99.95%, glacial acetic acid 100%, and phosphoric acid 85%. Britton–Robinson buffered solution (B-R) was prepared from 0.04 M acetic, boric, and phosphoric acids. Additionally, the buffered solution of B-R was adjusted for pH values by adding 0.2 M sodium hydroxide solution until a pH value of 2.2 was achieved. A water/ethanol (50:50, %v/v) mixture was used to prepare a stock solution of keracyanin chloride (KC). All experiments were conducted using significantly bi-distilled water to prepare fresh solutions.

2.2. Instruments

The electrochemical experiments were conducted on PGSTAT128N Autolab Electrochemical Workstation powered by NOVA 2.0 software (current resolution is 0.0003%, and the current accuracy is 0.2% of the current range) (Eco-Chemie, Utrecht, The Netherlands). High-purity nitrogen was used for degassing the solution before electrochemical measurements. Afterward, nitrogen was used as a blanket. All experiments were conducted at room temperature. A pH meter HI2221 (Hanna Instruments, Bucharest, Romania) was utilized to adjust the pH of solutions.

2.3. Disk Electrode

The study used three electrodes: a glassy carbon electrode (GCE, 3 mm diameter with a surface area of 0.07 cm2) for working electrodes, an Ag/AgCl electrode for reference electrodes, and a platinum electrode for counter electrodes. Two minutes were spent polishing the glassy carbon electrode with aqueous suspensions of 1.0 microns alumina and 0.05 microns diamond before each run. After rinsing with distilled water, the GCE was sonicated in ethanol and distilled water for five minutes. With a potential range of −1 to +1 V, cyclic voltammetry was used to clean the GCE electrochemically for 25 cycles at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1 in B-R buffer solution (pH 2.2, KC becomes more hydrophobic in an acidic medium due to their nonionizing OH groups, which migrate on the hydrophobic surface of GCE [20]).

2.4. Screen-Printed Electrodes

Silver reference and carbon counter electrodes were also used with a screen-printed working electrode (4 mm diameter, DropSens, Spain). Three screen-printed electrodes were utilized, including screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE), single-walled carbon nanotube-modified SPCE (SWCNTs-SPCE), and multi-walled carbon nanotube-modified SPCE (MWCNTs-SPCE). The electrode was electrochemically measured after casting 200 μL of a keracyanin chloride solution onto it.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Voltammetric Behavior of KC on GCE

CV analysis of 68 µM keracyanin in 0.04 M B-R buffer (pH 2.2) was performed on GCE at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1 in a potential window between 0 and +1.4 V (Figure 2, red voltammogram). One oxidation peak was observed at +0.59 V on the voltammogram, while two oxidation shoulders were observed at +1.1 V and +1.2 V. The anodic peak at +0.59 V indicates the formation of o-quinone through the oxidation of catechols in the B ring. In contrast, the smaller shoulders indicate the oxidation of hydroxyl groups in the less electroactive ring A [27,28]. The behavior of KC in the oxidation process was similar to what was observed previously in procyanidin B2 [27]. A previous study reported that the hydroxyl groups of the catechol B ring are more easily oxidized than those of the resorcinol A ring [29,30]. When the potential scan is switched at +0.9 V, the anodic peak at +0.59 V indicates a reversible reaction (inset in Figure 2, blue voltammogram). It is illustrated in a potential window between +0.2 and +0.9 V that KC illustrates a redox wave with an anodic peak potential (Epa) of +0.58 V and a cathodic peak potential (Epc) of +0.5 V. It has been shown that the peak separation was 80 mV when measured ΔEp = (Epa − Epc), which is a higher value than expected in a fully reversible system with two electrons (59/n mV). Moreover, it should be noted that the peak current ratio (ipc/ipa) was less than unity. In the inset in Figure 2, the black voltammogram indicates that the background buffer does not exhibit a redox response without keracyanin. As a result of these data, it can be concluded that the redox process of KC at GCE was quasi-reversible. The anodic peak can also be used for electrochemical sensing of KC in the future.
SWV was also used on GCE to investigate the electrochemical behavior of KC in 0.04 M B-R buffer (pH 2.2). SWV is more efficient than CV due to its faster analysis speed, lower redox species consumption, and more minor electrode surface poisoning problems [31]. Figure 3A shows the SWV of 68 µM keracyanin in 0.04 M B-R buffer (pH 2.2) on GCE. Interestingly, a new oxidation shoulder is observed at +0.45 V, and the original anodic peak is found in the same position (+0.59 V). It is possible to explain this because SWV is more susceptible to the enhancement in the oxidation of the catechol moiety of ring B by two oxidation waves.
An electroanalytical method can be made more sensitive by employing several strategies. In general, voltammetry is selected as the technique of choice, an accumulation step is incorporated, and the electroactive species are eventually regenerated through a catalytic chemical reaction. As a preconcentration step, electrochemical or adsorptive methods are typically used in electroanalytical applications. Normally, electroactive species are accumulated on the working electrode through electrochemical processes or adsorptive processes. As soon as the electroactive species have accumulated, the potential is scanned, and the current is sampled. The square-wave voltammetry (SWV) technique is widely used to analyze electrochemical variables quantitatively. Both oxidation peaks of KC were enhanced when adsorptive SWV (Figure 3B) was applied at a deposition potential of 0.2 V for 60 s accumulation time. The adsorptive SWV enhanced the other two shoulders involved in ring A hydroxylation at higher positive potentials. The difference in the measured current of KC between SWV and CV is approximately ten-times greater when SWV is used instead of CV. In this regard, square wave voltammetry is one of the most sensitive techniques for measuring current responses.
The voltammetric oxidation of KC was performed for various pHs of the supporting electrolyte on GCE. pH values were between 1.8 and 9.9, and the concentration of KC was fixed to 20 µM CFT in 0.04 M B-R buffer solution (Figure 4A). The anodic peak of KC oxidation was observed at all pH levels, and its position varied with pH, providing valuable information regarding the electrode process. The peak potential of oxidation (Ep) variation versus pH can be observed in Figure 4B, which shifts linearly towards lower positive values until the highest pH value (pH 9.9). This means that the KC oxidation mechanism is clearly impacted by deprotonation. Figure 4B shows a linear relationship for Ep vs. pH: Ep = 0.68 − 0.06 pH. Therefore, KC is electrochemically oxidized to produce the corresponding o-quinone by two-electron, two-proton oxidation, as shown in Scheme 1 [32].
Using the bare GCE, square wave voltammetry (SWV) was used to produce the calibration curve for KC. According to Figure 5, square wave voltammograms were obtained at various KC concentrations. As a result of the redox process associated with KC, a well-defined wave can be observed for all voltammograms near +0.5 V. The inset in Figure 5 illustrates the graph plotting KC concentrations against the peak areas. According to the regression analysis, the linear equation obtained was observed from 10 to 60 m KC with a correlation coefficient of 0.996 as follows:
Peak Area (CV/s) = 3.87 × 10−7 + 0.0726 [KC] (µM), r = 0.996
In order to calculate the peak area, the SW peak is integrated from 0.3 to 0.75 V to obtain a unit of an ampere voltage (A.V). Since ampere equals charge (C) per second (s), the final unit of the peak area is always calculated as (CV/s). There is a linear relationship between the concentration of the analyte and the area under the peak. Accordingly, the present analytical method was found to be linear within the specified range of values. Analytical curve parameters were used to calculate the limit of detection (LOD). LOD = 3 Sb/s, where Sb is the standard deviation of the y-intercept and s is the slope. Based on the given conditions, the calculated LOD is 5.2 µM.

3.2. Voltammetric Behavior of KC on SPCEs

The electrochemical response of keracyanin chloride was also determined using unmodified screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCEs), single-walled carbon nanotube-modified screen-printed carbon electrodes (SWCNTs-SPCEs), and multi-walled carbon nanotube-modified screen-printed carbon electrodes (MWCNTs-SPCEs). A square wave voltammogram of 68 µM keracyanin in 0.04 M B-R buffer (pH 2.2) at screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) (Figure 6) at a frequency of 20 Hz in a potential range of −0.5 V until +1.6 V vs. Ag illustrates similar oxidation behavior obtained on GCE. The square wave voltammograms using SPCEs during electrochemical experiments present one main anodic peak with a corresponding potential of around +0.35 V, with one shoulder at around 0.24 V vs. Ag, corresponding to the oxidation of the 3,4-hydroxyl groups of B ring to form the corresponding o-quinone [33]. Two more shoulders at a potential of around +0.96 V and 1.4 V vs. Ag correspond to the oxidation of the hydroxyl groups of the A ring.
The square wave voltammograms of KC using SWCNT-SPCEs (Figure 7A) and MWCNT-SPCEs (Figure 7B) present four anodic peaks representing the same hydroxyl groups as explained above. Figure 7A,B illustrates the first two peaks at ~0.1 mV and 0.45 mV, corresponding to the oxidation of the 3,4-hydroxyl groups of the B ring to form the corresponding o-quinone, and the remaining two peaks correspond to the oxidation of the hydroxyl groups of the A ring. It is worth noting that the modified screen-printed electrodes improve the sensitivity of the electrochemical response for KC oxidation. MWCNT-SPCEs show better sensitivity for KC oxidation than using SWCNT-SPCEs, illustrated by the high current values of the anodic peaks that correspond to the oxidation of the hydroxyl groups of the B ring and the oxidation of the hydroxyl groups of the A ring. Among the most interesting designs is the screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE), which combines the working electrode (made from carbon-based material), the reference electrode, and the counter electrode in one single-printed substrate. A number of electrochemical measurements were conducted using an SPCE due to its advantages for microscale analysis. As a result of the inert nature of SPCE substrates, interferences during electrochemical measurements are avoided. Aside from its wide potential window, an SPCE is also inert, has a low background current [34], and is reasonably priced [35]. With disposable SPCE platforms, this study presents a promising electrochemical investigation and quantification protocol for KC, which offers several advantages, including reproducibility, ease of scaling, and low cost. Consequently, screen-printed carbon electrodes may be used to develop electrochemical sensors for analyzing KC.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, keracyanin was characterized using glassy and screen-printed carbon electrodes using square wave and cyclic voltammetry techniques. The results of the experiments indicate that screen-printed carbon electrodes are sensitive to keracyanin detection. By understanding the electrochemical properties of keracyanin, we can better appreciate its antioxidant properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.F.N.; methodology, E.F.N., A.G.S. and M.E.; software, E.F.N.; validation, E.F.N.; formal analysis, E.F.N.; investigation, E.F.N.; resources, E.F.N. and M.E. data curation, E.F.N., A.G.S. and M.E.; writing—original draft preparation, E.F.N.; writing—review and editing, E.F.N.; visualization, E.F.N.; supervision, E.F.N.; project administration, E.F.N.; funding acquisition, E.F.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Clifford, M.N. Anthocyanins—Nature, occurrence and dietary burden. J. Sci. Food Agr. 2000, 80, 1063–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. He, J.; Giusti, M.M. Anthocyanins: Natural Colorants with Health-Promoting Properties. Ann. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 1, 163–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bishayee, A.; Darvesh, A.S. Oxidative stress in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases: Prevention and treatment by dietary antioxidants. In Handbook of Free Radicals: Formation, Types, and Effects; Kozyrev, D., Slutsky, V., Eds.; Nova Science Publishers: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 1–55. [Google Scholar]
  4. Darvesh, A.S.; Carroll, R.T.; Bishayee, A.; Geldenhuys, W.J.; Van der Schyf, C.J. Oxidative stress and Alzheimer’s disease: Dietary polyphenols as potential therapeutic agents. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2010, 10, 729–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Thomasset, S.; Teller, N.; Cai, H.; Marko, D.; Berry, D.P.; Steward, W.P.; Gescher, A.J. Do anthocyanins and anthocyanidins, cancer chemopreventive pigments in the diet, merit development as potential drugs? Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2009, 64, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kaume, L.; Howard, L.R.; Devareddy, L. The Blackberry Fruit: A Review on Its Composition and Chemistry, Metabolism and Bioavailability, and Health Benefits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 5716–5727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tsuda, T. Dietary anthocyanin-rich plants: Biochemical basis and recent progress in health benefits studies. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2012, 56, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, Y.; Vareed, S.K.; Nair, M.G. Human tumor cell growth inhibition by non-toxic anthocyanidins, the pigments in fruits and vegetables. Life Sci. 2005, 76, 1465–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fernandes, I.; Faria, A.; Azevedo, J.; Soares, S.; Calhau, C.; De Freitas, V.; Mateus, N. Influence of Anthocyanins, Derivative Pigments and Other Catechol and Pyrogallol-Type Phenolics on Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 3785–3792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Shih, P.H.; Yeh, C.T.; Yen, G.C. Effects of anthocyanidin on the inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis in human gastric adenocarcinoma cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2005, 43, 1557–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kamei, H.; Hashimoto, Y.; Koide, T.; Kojima, T.; Hasegawa, M. Anti-tumor effect of methanol extracts from red and white wines. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 1998, 13, 447–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Deguchi, T.; Yoshimoto, M.; Ohba, R.; Ueda, S. Antimutagenicity of the Purple Pigment, Hordeumin, from Uncooked Barley Bran-Fermented Broth. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2000, 64, 414–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ghiselli, A.; Nardini, M.; Baldi, A.; Scaccini, C. Antioxidant Activity of Different Phenolic Fractions Separated from an Italian Red Wine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Espin, J.C.; Soler-Rivas, C.; Wichers, H.J.; Viguera, C.G. Anthocyanin-Based Natural Colorants:  A New Source of Antiradical Activity for Foodstuff. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 1588–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, J.; Mazza, G. Inhibitory Effects of Anthocyanins and Other Phenolic Compounds on Nitric Oxide Production in LPS/IFN-γ-Activated RAW 264.7 Macrophages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 850–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Galvano, F.; La Fauci, L.; Lazzarino, G.; Fogliano, V.; Ritieni, A.; Ciappellano, S.; Battistini, N.C.; Tavazzi, B.; Galvano, G. Cyanidins: Metabolism and biological properties. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2004, 15, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hotta, H.; Nagano, S.; Ueda, M.; Tsujino, Y.; Koyama, J.; Osakai, T. Higher radical scavenging activities of polyphenolic antioxidants can be ascribed to chemical reactions following their oxidation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1572, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, B.; Kotani, A.; Arai, K.; Kusu, F. Estimation of the Antioxidant Activities of Flavonoids from Their Oxidation Potentials. Anal. Sci. 2001, 17, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mannino, S.; Brenna, O.; Buratti, S.; Cosio, M.S. A New Method for the Evaluation of the ‘Antioxidant Power’ of Wines. Electroanalysis 1998, 10, 908–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Arribas, A.S.; Martínez-Fernández, M.; Chicharro, M. The role of electroanalytical techniques in analysis of polyphenols in wine. Trends Anal. Chem. 2012, 34, 78–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Komorsky-Lovric, S.; Novak, I. Abrasive Stripping Square-Wave Voltammetry of Blackberry, Raspberry, Strawberry, Pomegranate, and Sweet and Blue Potatoes. J. Food Sci. 2011, 76, C916–C920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aguirre, M.J.; Chen, Y.Y.; Isaacs, M.; Matsuhiro, B.; Mendoza, L.; Torres, S. Electrochemical behaviour and antioxidant capacity of anthocyanins from Chilean red wine, grape and raspberry. Food Chem. 2010, 121, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Muñoz-Espada, A.C.; Wood, K.V.; Bordelon, B.; Watkins, B.A. Anthocyanin Quantification and Radical Scavenging Capacity of Concord, Norton, and Marechal Foch Grapes and Wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 6779–6786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sfragano, P.S.; Laschi, S.; Renai, L.; Fichera, M.; Bubba, M.D.; Palchetti, I. Electrochemical sensors based on sewage sludge–derived biochar for the analysis of anthocyanins in berry fruits. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2022, 414, 6295–6307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Benbouguerra, N.; Richard, T.; Saucier, C.; Garcia, F. Voltammetric Behavior, Flavanol and Anthocyanin Contents, and Antioxidant Capacity of Grape Skins and Seeds during Ripening (Vitis vinifera var. Merlot, Tannat, and Syrah). Antioxidants 2020, 9, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jovanovic, S.V.; Steenken, S.; Hara, Y.; Simic, M.G. Reduction potentials of flavonoid and model phenoxyl radicals. Which ring in flavonoids is responsible for antioxidant activity? J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1996, 2, 2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Newair, E.F.; Khairy, M. Sensitive Electrochemical Quantification of Proanthocyanidins in Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) by Utilizing Disposable Screen-printed Carbon Electrodes. Electroanalysis 2022, 34, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rebelo, M.J.; Rego, R.; Ferreira, M.; Oliveira, M.C. Comparative study of the antioxidant capacity and polyphenol content of Douro wines by chemical and electrochemical methods. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 566–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Newair, E.F.; Nafady, A.; Abdel-Hamid, R.; Al-Enizi, A.M.; Garcia, F. Mechanistic Pathways and Identification of the Electrochemically Generated Oxidation Products of Flavonoid Eriodictyol in the Presence of Glutathione. Electroanalysis 2018, 30, 1714–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Novak, I.; Šeruga, M.; Komorsky-Lovrić, Š. Square-wave and cyclic voltammetry of epicatechin gallateon glassy carbon electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2009, 631, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Adam, M.S.S.; Newair, E.F. Square-Wave and Cyclic Voltammetry of Native Proanthocyanidins Extracted from Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) on the Glassy Carbon Electrode. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bard, A.J.; Faulkner, L.R. Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed.; Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  33. Newair, E.F.; Bakr, A.; El-Sagher, H.M.; Khairy, M. Multiwalled carbon nanotube/reduced graphene oxide-decorated β-cyclodextrin polymer microflowers for simultaneous detection of antioxidants. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 297, 127363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Metters, J.P.; Kadara, R.O.; Banks, C.E. New directions in screen printed electroanalytical sensors: An overview of recent developments. Analyst 2011, 136, 1067–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liu, Y.; Dong, X.; Chen, P. Biological and chemical sensors based on graphene materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 283307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Chemical Structure of keracyanin chloride (cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside chloride).
Figure 1. Chemical Structure of keracyanin chloride (cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside chloride).
Electrochem 04 00018 g001
Figure 2. Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of 68 µM keracyanin in 0.04 M B-R buffer (pH 2.2) on GCE at scan rate 100 mV s−1. Inset: blue voltammogram of 68 µM keracyanin in a small potential window from +0.2 to +0.9 V, and black voltammogram is the background current in the absence of KC.
Figure 2. Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of 68 µM keracyanin in 0.04 M B-R buffer (pH 2.2) on GCE at scan rate 100 mV s−1. Inset: blue voltammogram of 68 µM keracyanin in a small potential window from +0.2 to +0.9 V, and black voltammogram is the background current in the absence of KC.
Electrochem 04 00018 g002
Figure 3. Square wave voltammogram (SWV) of 68 µM keracyanin in 0.04 M B-R buffer (pH 2.2) on GCE at frequency 20 Hz (A) non-adsorptive stripping SWV and (B) adsorptive stripping SWV with deposition potential 0.2 V for 60 s accumulation time.
Figure 3. Square wave voltammogram (SWV) of 68 µM keracyanin in 0.04 M B-R buffer (pH 2.2) on GCE at frequency 20 Hz (A) non-adsorptive stripping SWV and (B) adsorptive stripping SWV with deposition potential 0.2 V for 60 s accumulation time.
Electrochem 04 00018 g003
Figure 4. (A) Square wave voltammogram (SWV) of 20 µM keracyanin in 0.04 M B-R buffer at GCE at frequency 20 Hz, pulse amplitude 25 mV and potential step 1 mV at different pH values, (B) Ep vs. pH relationship.
Figure 4. (A) Square wave voltammogram (SWV) of 20 µM keracyanin in 0.04 M B-R buffer at GCE at frequency 20 Hz, pulse amplitude 25 mV and potential step 1 mV at different pH values, (B) Ep vs. pH relationship.
Electrochem 04 00018 g004
Scheme 1. The oxidation mechanism of keracyanin (KC).
Scheme 1. The oxidation mechanism of keracyanin (KC).
Electrochem 04 00018 sch001
Figure 5. Adsorptive square wave voltammograms (AdSWVs) of keracyanin in B-R buffer (pH 2.2) at GCE at deposition potential 0.2 V, accumulation time 60 s, frequency 20 Hz at different KC concentrations.
Figure 5. Adsorptive square wave voltammograms (AdSWVs) of keracyanin in B-R buffer (pH 2.2) at GCE at deposition potential 0.2 V, accumulation time 60 s, frequency 20 Hz at different KC concentrations.
Electrochem 04 00018 g005
Figure 6. SWV of 68 µM keracyanin in 0.04 M B-R buffer (pH 2.2) at screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) at frequency 20 Hz.
Figure 6. SWV of 68 µM keracyanin in 0.04 M B-R buffer (pH 2.2) at screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) at frequency 20 Hz.
Electrochem 04 00018 g006
Figure 7. SWV of 68 µM keracyanin in 0.04 M B-R buffer (pH 2.2) at a frequency of 20 Hz on (A) SWCNT-SPCEs (B) MWCNT-SPCEs (supporting electrolyte background is subtracted from the two figures).
Figure 7. SWV of 68 µM keracyanin in 0.04 M B-R buffer (pH 2.2) at a frequency of 20 Hz on (A) SWCNT-SPCEs (B) MWCNT-SPCEs (supporting electrolyte background is subtracted from the two figures).
Electrochem 04 00018 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Newair, E.F.; Shehata, A.G.; Essam, M. Electrochemical Oxidation Profile of Anthocyanin Keracyanin on Glassy and Screen-Printed Carbon Electrodes. Electrochem 2023, 4, 273-281. https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem4020018

AMA Style

Newair EF, Shehata AG, Essam M. Electrochemical Oxidation Profile of Anthocyanin Keracyanin on Glassy and Screen-Printed Carbon Electrodes. Electrochem. 2023; 4(2):273-281. https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem4020018

Chicago/Turabian Style

Newair, Emad F., Aboelhasan G. Shehata, and Menna Essam. 2023. "Electrochemical Oxidation Profile of Anthocyanin Keracyanin on Glassy and Screen-Printed Carbon Electrodes" Electrochem 4, no. 2: 273-281. https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem4020018

APA Style

Newair, E. F., Shehata, A. G., & Essam, M. (2023). Electrochemical Oxidation Profile of Anthocyanin Keracyanin on Glassy and Screen-Printed Carbon Electrodes. Electrochem, 4(2), 273-281. https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem4020018

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop