Previous Article in Journal
Biomechanical and Functional Outcomes in Transtibial Amputees Using the Transtibial Mercer Universal Prosthesis (MUP®): A 1-Year Longitudinal Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Challenges and Limitations of Machine Learning in Total Joint Arthroplasty: Insights from Recent Studies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Superior In Vitro Osteo-Supportive Properties of Trabecular Titanium vs. Chromium–Cobalt Scaffolds

by
Andrea Massimiliano Nebuloni
1,†,
Roberta Lauro
1,†,
Michela Maria Taiana
1,
Gaetano Sorano
2,
Piero Costa
3,
Enrico Ragni
1,* and
Laura de Girolamo
1
1
Laboratorio di Biotecnologie Applicate all’Ortopedia, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi–Sant’Ambrogio, Via Crisitina Belgioioso 173, 20157 Milano, Italy
2
MT Ortho S.r.l., Via Fossa Lupo, 95025 Aci Sant’Antonio, Italy
3
STI Lualdi S.r.l., Via del Molino 36, 33090 Vito d’Asio, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Prosthesis 2026, 8(7), 70; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis8070070
Submission received: 25 May 2026 / Revised: 19 June 2026 / Accepted: 23 June 2026 / Published: 1 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Joint Prostheses: Innovations in Shoulder, Hip, and Knee Replacement)

Abstract

Background: Degenerative joint diseases are a major cause of disability and drive the increasing demand for joint arthroplasty. Long-term prosthesis success depends on rapid and stable bone–implant integration, which is influenced by the osteo-inductive and osteo-conductive properties of implant materials. Chromium–cobalt (CrCo) and titanium (Ti) alloys are widely used in reconstructive orthopedics, but direct comparative data on their biological performance, particularly for trabecular titanium (T-Ti), remain limited. This study aimed to directly compare the biocompatibility and osteogenic potential of CrCo and T-Ti using human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). Methods: Human MSCs were characterized by immunophenotyping and cultured on CrCo and T-Ti scaffolds under control and osteogenic conditions for up to 28 days. Cell adhesion and morphology were assessed by scanning electron microscopy. Proliferation and viability were quantified, and osteogenic differentiation was evaluated using alkaline phosphatase activity, calcium deposition assays, and gene expression profiling of osteogenic markers. Results: Both materials supported MSC adhesion and proliferation, confirming cytocompatibility. Under control conditions, T-Ti significantly increased alkaline phosphatase activity and osteogenic gene expression. Under osteogenic stimulation, T-Ti accelerated differentiation and mineralized matrix deposition. CrCo exhibited limited stimulation of the osteogenic-supportive microenvironment and delayed differentiation responses. Conclusions: Trabecular titanium, in terms of morphology and topology, provides a biologically active scaffold that both induces and conducts osteogenic differentiation of human MSCs, whereas CrCo acts primarily as a mechanically optimized but biologically passive material. These findings support the use of trabecular titanium at bone-contact interfaces in joint prostheses to enhance osteointegration and potentially improve long-term implant stability.
Keywords: trabecular titanium; chromium–cobalt; prostheses; mesenchymal stromal cells; osteo-induction; osteo-conduction; arthrodesis trabecular titanium; chromium–cobalt; prostheses; mesenchymal stromal cells; osteo-induction; osteo-conduction; arthrodesis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nebuloni, A.M.; Lauro, R.; Taiana, M.M.; Sorano, G.; Costa, P.; Ragni, E.; de Girolamo, L. Superior In Vitro Osteo-Supportive Properties of Trabecular Titanium vs. Chromium–Cobalt Scaffolds. Prosthesis 2026, 8, 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis8070070

AMA Style

Nebuloni AM, Lauro R, Taiana MM, Sorano G, Costa P, Ragni E, de Girolamo L. Superior In Vitro Osteo-Supportive Properties of Trabecular Titanium vs. Chromium–Cobalt Scaffolds. Prosthesis. 2026; 8(7):70. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis8070070

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nebuloni, Andrea Massimiliano, Roberta Lauro, Michela Maria Taiana, Gaetano Sorano, Piero Costa, Enrico Ragni, and Laura de Girolamo. 2026. "Superior In Vitro Osteo-Supportive Properties of Trabecular Titanium vs. Chromium–Cobalt Scaffolds" Prosthesis 8, no. 7: 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis8070070

APA Style

Nebuloni, A. M., Lauro, R., Taiana, M. M., Sorano, G., Costa, P., Ragni, E., & de Girolamo, L. (2026). Superior In Vitro Osteo-Supportive Properties of Trabecular Titanium vs. Chromium–Cobalt Scaffolds. Prosthesis, 8(7), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis8070070

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop