Next Article in Journal
Isolation, Synthesis, and Use of Natural Photosensitizers in the Treatment of Central Nervous System Tumors
Previous Article in Journal
Sustained Release of Antibacterial Therapeutic Elements from Functionalized Mesoporous Silica-Coated Silver Nanoparticles for Bone Tissue Engineering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Temperature-Dependent Growth Mechanisms and Optical Properties of MgF2 Thin Films Synthesized by Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition

1
Xiamen Key Laboratory of Development and Application for Advanced Semiconductor Coating Technology, The School of Opto-Electronic and Communication Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China
2
Institute of Optoelectronic Display, National & Local United Engineering Lab of Flat Panel Display Technology, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350002, China
3
College of Physics and Information Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chemistry 2025, 7(5), 147; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry7050147
Submission received: 10 August 2025 / Revised: 30 August 2025 / Accepted: 11 September 2025 / Published: 15 September 2025

Abstract

MgF2 films are prepared using plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition (PEALD). The influence of substrate temperature on the growth behavior, chemical composition, and optical properties of MgF2 films is systematically investigated. The experimental results show that the deposition process transitions through three distinct regimes: an incomplete-reaction regime at 100 °C, a self-limiting ALD window at 125–150 °C, and a chemical vapor deposition (CVD)-like regime above 175 °C. At 100 °C, incomplete surface chemistry yields low growth-per-cycle, carbon incorporation, and an elevated refractive index. Within 125–150 °C, films are near-stoichiometric, smooth, and exhibit a low refractive index ≈ 1.37 ± 0.003 at 550 nm. Above 175 °C, precursor decomposition drives non-self-limiting growth with increased roughness. As an application-level validation, a film grown at 125 °C used as a double-sided antireflection coating on glass increases transmittance from 92 ± 0.1% (bare) to 97.2% ± 0.2% at 550 nm. The average transmittance of 96.4 ± 0.2% over 380–780 nm can be achieved. Overall, this work establishes the relationship between deposition temperature and PEALD-MgF2 film properties and demonstrates precise, low-temperature, non-corrosive deposition suitable for advanced optical antireflection coatings.

1. Introduction

Optical thin films play a vital role in modern photonic and optoelectronic devices. They enable precise control of light propagation, reflection, and transmission. Among their diverse applications, antireflection (AR) coatings are indispensable. They reduce surface reflection losses and improve the efficiency of optical systems. These systems include cameras, solar cells, and display panels. MgF2 has become a preferred material for AR coatings. This is due to its low refractive index, high transparency across a broad spectral range, and excellent chemical stability [1,2,3]. MgF2 finds extensive use in ultraviolet (UV) and deep ultraviolet (DUV) optoelectronic devices, protective coatings, and high-performance laser systems [2,4,5,6].
Traditional deposition techniques include vacuum evaporation, electron-beam evaporation, and sputtering [7,8,9,10,11,12]. These methods have been widely used to fabricate MgF2 films. However, they often face limitations. These limitations involve thickness uniformity, conformality on complex substrates, and precise control of film properties. Recently, atomic layer deposition (ALD) has emerged as a promising approach for preparing high-quality MgF2 thin films. ALD offers advantages, including atomic-scale thickness control, excellent step coverage, and tunable properties of the film [13,14,15]. Existing literature largely focuses on thermal ALD MgF2. Lee et al. demonstrated an ALD route to MgF2 using HF–pyridine, achieving self-limiting growth (~0.4 Å/cycle at 150 °C) and a refractive index ≈ 1.40 at 589 nm [16]. Pilvi et al. introduced TaF5 as an ALD fluorine source. They produced dense, polycrystalline, columnar MgF2 at 350 °C [17]. Putkonen et al. proposed an “oxide-to-fluoride” ALD strategy [18]. This yielded MgF2 films with a refractive index of ≈ 1.429 and O < 2 at% at growth rates of ~0.38–0.49 Å cycle−1 with uniform coverage. However, thermal ALD operates at high growth temperatures. These high temperatures typically induce crystallization, which can negatively impact AR performance by increasing light scattering. Furthermore, many thermal ALD processes use highly corrosive precursors like HF–pyridine. This poses significant challenges for equipment compatibility and safety. In contrast, studies on plasma-enhanced ALD (PEALD) MgF2 remain significantly scarce. Its fundamental growth mechanisms are not yet fully elucidated. Plasma introduction in PEALD enhances precursor reactivity. This enables lower deposition temperatures. Lower growth temperatures are intrinsically beneficial for achieving amorphous films. This feature, combined with the inherent capability of ALD for low surface roughness, is crucial for high-performance AR coatings. Amorphous structures and smooth surfaces minimize light scattering. Moreover, SF6 has been explored as a fluorine source in other methods, like sputtering [19,20]. Such applications often result in polycrystalline films with high roughness. However, the application of SF6 plasma as a novel fluorine source has not been reported to date. This approach avoids highly corrosive precursors and reduces the thermal budget. Deposition temperature is a particularly critical factor. It directly governs the properties of the film. However, the effects of deposition temperature on PEALD MgF2 properties remain insufficiently explored. This lack of mechanistic understanding in PEALD MgF2 represents a significant knowledge gap. It hinders rational process optimization. It also obstructs the precise tailoring of MgF2 coatings for advanced optical applications.
This work addresses these pressing challenges. Our objective is to explore the effect of deposition temperature on the growth behavior and optical performance of PEALD MgF2 thin films, with the aim of identifying an optimal process window for advanced antireflective coating applications. The primary scientific novelty of our study lies in the comprehensive elucidation of distinct temperature-dependent growth regimes. Our results reveal a clear transition in the growth mechanism moving from unsaturated surface reactions at lower temperatures, an optimal self-limiting ALD window, and chemical vapor deposition (CVD)-like deposition at high temperatures. The PEALD MgF2 in this work offers a path to low-temperature amorphous growth, the inherent capability of PEALD for low surface roughness, and avoidance of corrosive precursors. The demonstration of the optimized MgF2 film’s superior AR performance on glass substrates serves as a direct validation of the films.

2. Materials and Methods

MgF2 thin films were deposited on 1 mm thick glass substrates (2 cm × 2 cm, Corning EXG, Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA) that were first cleaned using an ultrasonic bath in the following sequence: deionized water, acetone, ethanol, isopropanol (≥99.5%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), and deionized water again. Each cleaning step was carried out for 15 min, followed by nitrogen gas drying. Afterwards, the substrates were placed in an oven for 30 min. The MgF2 deposition was performed using a PEALD system (ICP-ALD 200, Xiamen Xinyifang Technology Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China), the substrate was not rotated during deposition. Magnesium precursor bis(cyclopentadienyl)magnesium [Mg(Cp)2] (Purity: 99.9999%, Aimou Yuan, Nanjing, China) and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) plasma were alternately introduced into the reaction chamber as the magnesium source and fluorine source, respectively. The Mg(Cp)2 precursor was maintained at 90 °C in a stainless-steel bubbler to ensure sufficient vapor pressure, and the precursor pipelines were heated to 150 °C to prevent condensation. SF6 plasma was generated by a remote inductively coupled plasma (ICP) source operating at 13.56 MHz with an RF power of 800 W. High-purity nitrogen (99.999%, Honghua Gas Co., Ltd., Xiamen, Fujian, China) was used as both the carrier gas for the Mg(Cp)2 precursor and the purging gas. The process parameters were as follows: Mg(Cp)2 pulse time (3 s), nitrogen purge time (6 s), SF6 plasma pulse time (10 s), and nitrogen purge time (8 s). The deposition temperature was varied from 100 °C to 200 °C, as listed in Table 1.
The temperature-dependent growth mechanism for MgF2 is proposed in Figure 1. The relevant chemical reactions are given as Equations (1a)–(3b). The symbol s denotes substrate surface, F* represents fluorine radicals, and the symbol ↑ indicates volatile products. At 100 °C (incomplete reaction regime), the plasma energy was insufficient for complete ligand exchange, as described by Equation (1a,b). During the first half-reaction, the Mg(C5H5)2 precursor reacted incompletely with the available surface –HF groups. In the second half-reaction, the fluorine radicals lack the energy to fully strip the residual C5H5 ligands from the surface. This might lead to a small amount of cyclopentadienyl remaining in the film. At 125 and 150 °C (ALD window), the process adhered to the ideal, self-limiting reactions shown in Equation (2a,b). The thermal energy was sufficient for every surface –HF group to react with the Mg precursor during the first pulse. The fluorine radicals were also energetic enough to completely remove every cyclopentadienyl ligand during the plasma step. This complete and sequential surface chemistry established the ideal ALD window. Above 175 °C (decomposition and CVD-like regime), the Mg(C5H5)2 precursor began to undergo partial thermal decomposition on the surface (Equation (3a,b)). This created highly reactive Mg and Mg-Cp fragments that were not fully removed during the purge step. These residual species were then fluorinated during the plasma pulse, leading to growth that was no longer self-limited. The predictable consequences were a higher deposition rate, rougher and cluster-rich film morphologies characteristic of CVD-like deposition, and a loss of precise thickness control.
s-HF + Mg(C5H5)2s-HF (x) + s-FMgC5H5(1 − x) + C5H6
s-HF (x) + s-FMgC5H5(1 − x) + F* → s-HF (x) + s-FMgHF(y) + s-FMgC5H5(1 − x − y) + CF4↑ + HF↑
s-HF + Mg(C5H5)2s-FMgC5H5 + C5H6
s-FMgC5H5 + F* → s-FMgHF + CF4↑ + HF↑
s-HF + Mg(C5H5)2s-FMgC5H5 + Mg/MgC5H5 + C5H6
s-FMgC5H5 + Mg/MgC5H5 + F* → s-FMgHF + s-HFMgF2 + CF4↑ + HF↑
The refractive index and thickness of MgF2 films were determined by spectroscopic ellipsometry (M2000, J.A. Woollam Co., Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). Measurements were performed from 300 to 800 nm at incident angles of 65°. A four-layer optical model was used to analyze the ellipsometric data (Ψ and Δ). This model included a substrate, a bulk MgF2 film layer (modeled by a Cauchy dispersion with k = 0), a Bruggeman effective medium approximation surface roughness layer (50% film material, 50% void), and an ambient air layer. The crystalline structure of the films was investigated by grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD, Rigaku TTRAX III, Ibaraki, Japan) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm) at a fixed incidence angle (ω) of 0.5°. The scan was performed in the range of 10° ≤ 2θ ≤ 80°, with a scan rate of 1 °/min. The chemical composition and electronic states of the films were analyzed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB 250Xi, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). For the XPS measurements, argon-ion sputtering was performed prior to acquisition to remove surface adventitious species (etch depth ≈ 10 nm) and minimize contamination effects. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Zeiss, sigma 500, Oberkochen, Germany) was used to examine the surface morphology of the films, operating at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. An atomic force microscope (AFM, XE7, Park-Systems, Suwon, Republic of Korea) was employed to measure root-mean-square (RMS) surface roughness and surface morphologies. The optical transmittance of the MgF2 thin films deposited on glass substrates was measured using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Lambda 850, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) over a wavelength range of 300–800 nm. The intensity of plasma species was recorded by using an optical emission spectroscopy (OES, C210-DUVN, Xiamen Xinyifang Technology Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2a depicts the PEALD system used in this work. Prior studies reported unintended oxygen incorporation in PEALD-grown nitrides/fluorides, predominantly arising from plasma-induced erosion of the ICP quartz tube, which releases oxygen-containing species [21,22,23]. To mitigate this, we employ a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-lined plasma quartz tube to suppress quartz erosion and the concomitant oxygen release. A corrosion-resistant dry pump is equipped to withstand F-containing by-products and prevents hydrocarbon backstreaming. Before deposition, the chamber is pre-pumped to ~1 × 10−6 Torr using a turbomolecular pump to minimize residual O2 and H2O. Figure 2b shows the OES spectrum of the SF6 plasma. The peaks are assigned to SFx and F* radicals according to the literature [24,25]. Although the sulfur-related emission lines are observed in the plasma, no sulfur is detected in the films (as will be shown later), indicating that sulfur-containing fragments do not participate in surface reactions and are removed with the exhaust. The F* radicals play a major role in the ligand exchange during the SF6 plasma half-reaction.
Figure 3a illustrates the relationship between the film thickness and the cycle number for MgF2 thin films deposited at different temperatures. The thickness of films prepared at lower temperatures (≤150 °C) increases linearly with the number of cycles, indicating the self-limiting growth. While the films deposited at higher temperatures show non-linear growth, inferring they deviated from ideal PEALD behavior. Figure 3b compiles the growth-per-cycle (GPC) versus temperature derived from linear fits of the thickness–cycle data. This GPC–temperature trend provides direct kinetic evidence for the three-regime mechanism proposed in Figure 1. At 100 °C, the GPC is low, consistent with incomplete ligand exchange in Equation (1a,b). Within 125–150 °C, the GPC becomes temperature-insensitive at ~1.98 ± 0.05 Å cycle−1, corroborating a self-limiting ALD window (Equation (2a,b)) and exceeding typical thermal-ALD values (~0.4–0.9 Å cycle−1) [16,26]. Above 175 °C, the GPC increases sharply, indicative of a decomposition-assisted, CVD-like pathway (Equation (3a,b)). This high-temperature regime also shows increased roughness and slight off-stoichiometry, further supporting growth outside strict site-saturation.
Figure 4a–e presents SEM images of MgF2 films deposited at 100–200 °C. At 100 °C, the surface is covered with small, isolated particles and negligible clustering. When the substrate temperature is raised to 125 °C and 150 °C, the particles become large due to the enhanced surface atom migration [27]. Further elevating the substrate temperature seems to result in smaller particles accompanied by more pronounced clustering. The AFM morphological images, as shown in the insets, reveal smooth surfaces with minimal differences among samples prepared at 100–150 °C, while higher deposition temperatures result in a noticeably rougher surface. The RMS roughness values of the films are extracted as illustrated in Figure 4f. The RMS roughness reduces from 1.55 nm at 100 °C to 0.6–0.8 nm at 125–150 °C, then increases to 4.18 nm at 175 °C and 7.01 nm at 200 °C. The reduction at 125–150 °C reflects smoother, denser growth in the ALD window, whereas the sharp rise above 175 °C signals the transition to decomposition-assisted, CVD-like growth with particle coalescence and surface irregularity. Overall, the morphology and roughness evolution—smoothest at 125–150 °C and pronounced roughening at ≥175 °C—is consistent with the three-regime mechanism in Figure 1.
Figure 5 shows the GIXRD patterns of MgF2 films deposited at different substrate temperatures. For all films, only a broad amorphous halo centered at approximately 20–30° (2θ) is observed and no MgF2 Bragg reflections are present, indicating that the films are X-ray amorphous over this temperature range. An amorphous microstructure is highly desirable for visible antireflection coatings. The absence of grains and grain boundaries minimizes elastic light scattering and avoids crystallographic birefringence [7,28]. These characteristics directly contribute to smoother surfaces and lower scattering, which are crucial for achieving high transmittance and stable optical constants, thus benefiting AR performance. Thermal ALD typically requires high growth temperatures (≥250–300 °C) [26,29]. Such high temperatures frequently induce crystallization and thus negatively impacting antireflective performance. Plasma assistance in PEALD is known to enhance precursor reactivity. This generally enables lower deposition temperatures, which can in turn suppress crystallization. Therefore, the amorphous structure achieved by the PEALD MgF2 films offers a significant advantage for high-performance antireflection coatings.
Figure 6a presents the XPS survey spectra of MgF2 thin films deposited at various substrate temperatures. The spectra showed clear Mg and F peaks and weak C and O peaks. No sulfur was detected, indicating that sulfur-containing species observed in OES do not participate in the surface chemistry. Figure 6b plots the atomic ratios of Mg, F, C, and O versus substrate temperature. The 100 °C sample has a significantly higher carbon content than other samples, attributed to insufficient energy to completely remove organic components of the metal precursor during the surface ligand exchange process. The oxygen content stays below 1.5 at.% for all films, reflecting the effectiveness of the PTFE-lined ICP tube and the high-vacuum pre-pump in suppressing oxygen incorporation. In comparison, the films prepared with an unlined plasma tube under identical conditions exhibit a significantly higher oxygen content of 6.2 at.%. Correspondingly, the F:Mg ratio also improves from 1.72 (unlined) to 1.92 (PTFE-lined). Figure 6c depicts the F 1s core-level spectra of the films. The deconvolution (shown for the 100 °C sample as representative) yields two components at ~685 eV and 688.5 eV, assigned to Mg–F and C-F, respectively [30,31]. The area ratios of C-F component to the total are plotted in Figure 6d. The trend of C-F peak area ratio is similar to that of carbon content, suggesting that the elevated carbon at 100 °C originates from incomplete ligand removal during unsaturated low-temperature half-reactions. Deposition temperature is therefore a key variable for controlling film purity and stoichiometry. These compositional trends align with the mechanism in Figure 1: at 100 °C, incomplete reactions leave residual C/C-F; at 125–150 °C, self-limiting half-reactions minimize impurities and stabilize stoichiometry; and at ≥175 °C, slight deviations are consistent with decomposition-assisted growth.
Figure 7 displays the refractive index spectra of MgF2 films grown at 100–200 °C together with the bare-glass reference. It is observed that the curves of all coated samples remain remarkably lower than that of bare glass across the spectrum, enabling the antireflection function. Using the refractive index at 550 nm for comparison, the film deposited at 100 °C exhibits the highest value, whereas that prepared at 125 °C reaches a minimum of 1.37 ± 0.003, matching the value reported for ideal bulk MgF2 [32,33]. This low refractive index contrasts sharply with the 1.49 observed for films prepared using an unlined tube under identical conditions. The 150–200 °C curves nearly overlap but with a slight upward trend, indicating that any further densification beyond the ALD window is marginal. The refractive index reaches its minimum at 125 °C, where the film is near-stoichiometric MgF2 and carbon is lowest (XPS C ≈ 1.46 at%), minimizing electronic polarizability. At 150 °C, although still within the ALD window, the refractive index increases slightly, consistent with a small rise in carbon (≈1.64 at%) and marginally tighter packing. From 175 to 200 °C, the XPS result shows a mild F deficiency, which increases the average electronic polarizability and further contributes to the rise in n. By contrast, at 125 °C the index reaches a minimum because self-limited growth yields near-stoichiometric MgF2 with the lowest carbon level. Overall, the index evolution—high at 100 °C, a minimum within 125–150 °C, and a rise at ≥175 °C—aligns with the three-regime mechanism: incomplete low-temperature reactions leave residual organics (higher n); self-limiting chemistry in the ALD window yields low-n films; and decomposition-assisted growth at high temperature introduces off-stoichiometry that elevates n.
Figure 8 compares the transmittance spectra of glass without and with the films deposited at different substrate temperatures. The transmittance increases with deposition temperature and reaches a maximum at 125 °C, then declines at higher temperatures. The process temperature also dictated the film’s final thickness, which was measured to be 56, 78, 81, 130, and 166 nm for deposition temperatures of 100, 125, 150, 175, and 200 °C, respectively. These physical thickness variations, coupled with changes in refractive index (n), alter the optical path length (n × d, where d is the physical thickness) of the film. The red shift in the interference maxima in the transmittance spectra corresponds directly to the increase in optical path length. This follows the relationship for a quarter-wave antireflection coating, where the maximum transmittance wavelength is approximately 4nd. While the spectral positions of these maxima are thickness-dependent, their peak magnitudes provide a direct indication of the intrinsic antireflection quality and material purity of the films. Considering the overall anti-reflection performance, the 125 °C film achieves the optimal balance, having the lowest refractive index and the smoothest surface (0.6 nm RMS). This combination leads to the highest peak transmittance, approximately 95.4 ± 0.2%, and the best overall antireflective performance. At 150 °C, the refractive index slightly rises, while roughness remains low at 0.8 nm, with peak transmittance still high, around 95 ± 0.2%. However, at 175 °C and 200 °C, both the refractive index gradually increases (1.38) and the RMS roughness sharply rises (4.2–7.0 nm). These factors degrade antireflective properties. Although peak transmittance can still reach around 95.0 ± 0.2%, the significantly increased roughness causes greater light scattering, which distorts the spectral shape. Therefore, the film deposited at 125 °C is identified as optimal. It minimizes both reflective and scattering losses due to its ideal refractive index and smoothest surface morphology.
To further enhance the transmittance of glass, the optimal MgF2 film (deposited at 125 °C) was coated on both sides. Figure 9a compares the broadband transmittance of bare glass with substrates bearing single-sided and double-sided MgF2 coatings. The single-sided coating improves transmittance from 92.0 ± 0.1% (bare) to 95.4 ± 0.2% at 550 nm. For double-sided coatings, the transmission reaches 97.2 ± 0.2% at 550 nm, with an average visible transmittance (380–780 nm) of 96.4 ± 0.2% (compared to 93.8 ± 0.2% for single-sided). As transmission below ~350 nm is limited by the glass substrate, the analysis focuses on the visible band. In addition, Figure 9b plots the transmitted chromaticity (CIE 1931 (x, y), 2°/D65) for bare glass, single-sided, and double-sided coated samples. Table 2 reports comprehensive color specifications. It includes CIE 1931 (x, y) coordinates and CIE 1976 (L*, a*, b*) color parameters. L* represents lightness, a* indicates the red-green chromaticity, and b* indicates the yellow-blue chromaticity. ΔEab quantifies the total color difference within this CIE 1976 space, calculated for each coating relative to bare glass. The coatings lie close to the D65 white point. The ΔEab is approximately 1.43 for single-sided coatings and 2.24 for double-sided coatings. These low color differences are highly desirable, ensuring excellent visual clarity and color fidelity for optical applications.
Table 3 compares MgF2 thin film properties achieved by PEALD in this work and other deposition methods. Thermal ALD typically operates at much higher temperatures (350 °C). This yields polycrystalline films with significantly higher roughness (6.3–7.1 nm), despite achieving similar refractive indices. Such high-temperature growth, which leads to increased roughness and compositional deviations, inherently restricts the practical use of these films in high-performance optical systems. E-beam evaporation can produce amorphous films with low roughness (0.56 nm) but at a higher deposition temperature (240 °C). Sputtering can deposit films at room temperature. However, it tends to produce nanocrystalline or polycrystalline structures and results in higher roughness (12 nm). The PEALD approach in this work thus integrates a low deposition temperature, amorphous microstructure, low refractive index, and exceptionally low surface roughness simultaneously. This combination results in high transmittance, surpassing values achieved by other methods.

4. Conclusions

This work systematically elucidates the critical role of substrate temperature in governing the growth kinetics, chemical composition, and functional properties of PEALD-MgF2 thin films. Three distinct deposition regimes can be identified. At 100 °C, incomplete surface reactions lead to carbonaceous impurities and a reduced growth rate. A transition to an optimal, self-limiting ALD window occurs between 125 and 150 °C, where the GPC stabilizes at ~1.98 Å cycle−1. Within this window, the films have low impurity content, remain X-ray amorphous, and exhibit a refractive index of ~1.37 ± 0.003 at 550 nm—closely matching bulk MgF2—together with an ultra-smooth surface (RMS 0.6–0.8 nm). Upon increasing the temperature above 175 °C, the process enters a CVD-like regime in which precursor thermal decomposition dominates, leading to a sharp increase in GPC and an RMS roughness of 4–7 nm. The optimized 125 °C film is applied as a double-sided antireflection coating on glass, and yields 97.2 ± 0.2% transmittance at 550 nm (average visible transmittance of 96.4 ± 0.2%). Compared with thermal ALD reports that typically require ≥250 °C to reach similar optical constants, these results confirm that high-quality MgF2 can be grown at significantly lower temperatures while delivering superior AR performance. The PEALD MgF2 films are amorphous, smooth, and exhibit a bulk-like refractive index, presenting a valuable new pathway for the rational design of high-quality MgF2 AR coatings. Future work will focus on integrating the films into multilayer stacks for next-generation broadband antireflection coatings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-Y.L.; methodology, S.-Y.L.; software, X.L.; validation, Z.-X.Z., C.-H.H. and C.W.; formal analysis, X.L.; investigation, X.L.; resources, S.-Y.L.; data curation, J.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-Y.L.; writing—review and editing, S.-Y.L.; visualization, S.-Y.L.; supervision, W.-X.Z.; project administration, S.-Y.L.; funding acquisition, S.-Y.L. and C.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is sponsored by the Science and technology Project of Xiamen (No. 3502Z202373061), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (No. 2023J011459, No. 2024J011213), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61904155), the Science and technology Project of Fujian Provincial Department of Education (No. JAT200484), the Graduate Science and Technology Innovation Program (Nos. YKJCX2024090 and YKJCX2024146).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Yujing Optoelectronics (Xiamen) Co., Ltd. for providing support with the testing platform.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Cui, X.; Ding, R.; Wang, M.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Xu, Y. In Situ Surface Assembly Derived Ultralow Refractive Index MgF2–SiO2 Hybrid Film for Tri-Layer Broadband Antireflective Coating. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2016, 4, 722–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Park, G.-T.; Kim, J.-H.; Lee, S.; Kim, D.I.; An, K.-S.; Lee, E.; Yim, S.; Kim, S.-K. Conformal Antireflective Multilayers for High-Numerical-Aperture Deep-Ultraviolet Lenses. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2024, 12, 2401040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yoo, G.Y.; Nurrosyid, N.; Lee, S.; Jeong, Y.; Yoon, I.; Kim, C.; Kim, W.; Jang, S.-Y.; Do, Y.R. Newly Developed Broadband Antireflective Nanostructures by Coating a Low-Index MgF2 Film onto a SiO2 Moth-Eye Nanopattern. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 10626–10636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ding, Y.; Liu, L.; Wang, C.; Li, C.; Lin, N.; Niu, S.; Han, Z.; Duan, J. Bioinspired Near-Full Transmittance MgF2 Window for Infrared Detection in Extremely Complex Environments. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 30985–30997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kim, J.-H.; Kim, D.I.; Lee, S.S.; An, K.-S.; Yim, S.; Lee, E.; Kim, S.-K. Wide-Angle Deep Ultraviolet Antireflective Multilayers via Discrete-to-Continuous Optimization. Nanophotonics 2023, 12, 1913–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pfeiffer, K.; Ghazaryan, L.; Schulz, U.; Szeghalmi, A. Wide-Angle Broadband Antireflection Coatings Prepared by Atomic Layer Deposition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 21887–21894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, W.; Cao, W.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, K. An Amorphous MgF2 Anti-Reflective Thin Film for Enhanced Performance of Inverted Organic–Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 2757–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fernández-Perea, M.; Larruquert, J.I.; Aznárez, J.A.; Pons, A.; Méndez, J.A. Vacuum Ultraviolet Coatings of Al Protected with MgF2 Prepared Both by Ion-Beam Sputtering and by Evaporation. Appl. Opt. 2007, 46, 4871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Reuna, J.; Polojärvi, V.; Pääkkönen, P.; Lahtonen, K.; Raappana, M.; Aho, T.; Isoaho, R.; Aho, A.; Valden, M.; Guina, M. Influence of Ex-Situ Annealing on the Properties of MgF2 Thin Films Deposited by Electron Beam Evaporation. Opt. Mater. 2019, 96, 109326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, G.; Fu, X.; Song, S.; Guo, K.; Zhang, J. Influences of Oxygen Ion Beam on the Properties of Magnesium Fluoride Thin Film Deposited Using Electron Beam Evaporation Deposition. Coatings 2019, 9, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mertin, S.; Marot, L.; Sandu, C.S.; Steiner, R.; Scartezzini, J.; Muralt, P. Nanocrystalline Low-Refractive Magnesium Fluoride Films Deposited by Reactive Magnetron Sputtering: Optical and Structural Properties. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2015, 17, 1652–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Martinů, L.; Biederman, H.; Holland, L. Thin Films Prepared by Sputtering MgF2 in an Rf Planar Magnetron. Vacuum 1985, 35, 531–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Johnson, R.W.; Hultqvist, A.; Bent, S.F. A Brief Review of Atomic Layer Deposition: From Fundamentals to Applications. Mater. Today 2014, 17, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cremers, V.; Puurunen, R.L.; Dendooven, J. Conformality in Atomic Layer Deposition: Current Status Overview of Analysis and Modelling. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2019, 6, 021302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Profijt, H.B.; Potts, S.E.; Van De Sanden, M.C.M.; Kessels, W.M.M. Plasma-Assisted Atomic Layer Deposition: Basics, Opportunities, and Challenges. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Film. 2011, 29, 050801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lee, Y.; Sun, H.; Young, M.J.; George, S.M. Atomic Layer Deposition of Metal Fluorides Using HF–Pyridine as the Fluorine Precursor. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 2022–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pilvi, T.; Ritala, M.; Leskelä, M.; Bischoff, M.; Kaiser, U.; Kaiser, N. Atomic Layer Deposition Process with TiF4 as a Precursor for Depositing Metal Fluoride Thin Films. Appl. Opt. 2008, 47, C271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Putkonen, M.; Szeghalmi, A.; Pippel, E.; Knez, M. Atomic Layer Deposition of Metal Fluorides through Oxide Chemistry. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 14461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, C.; Ma, C.; Liu, J.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Y. Preparation of Wide Optical Spectrum and High Antireflection MgF2 Thin Film with SF6 as Reactive Gas. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 026415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, C.; Zhao, C.; Liu, J.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Y. Effect of SF6 Flow Ratio on Microstructure and Properties of MgF2 Thin Films Prepared by Magnetron Sputtering. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2021, 762, 138086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Butcher, K.S.A.; Georgiev, V.; Georgieva, D. Recent Advances in Hollow Cathode Technology for Plasma-Enhanced ALD—Plasma Surface Modifications for Aluminum and Stainless-Steel Cathodes. Coatings 2021, 11, 1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ren, F.-B.; Jiang, S.-C.; Hsu, C.-H.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Gao, P.; Wu, W.-Y.; Chiu, Y.-J.; Lien, S.-Y.; Zhu, W.-Z. Deposition Mechanism and Properties of Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposited Gallium Nitride Films with Different Substrate Temperatures. Molecules 2022, 27, 8123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Messina, D.C.; Eller, B.S.; Scowen, P.A.; Nemanich, R.J. Comparison of AlF3 Thin Films Grown by Thermal and Plasma Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2022, 40, 012404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Osipov, A.A.; Andrianov, N.A.; Speshilova, A.B.; Gagaeva, A.E.; Risquez, S.; Vorobyev, A.; Alexandrov, S.E. Highly Selective Plasma Etching Technique for Molybdenum. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2023, 43, 697–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Anderson, H.M.; Merson, J.A.; Light, R.W. A Kinetic Model for Plasma Etching Silicon in a SF6/O2 RF Discharge. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 1986, 14, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pilvi, T.; Puukilainen, E.; Kreissig, U.; Leskelä, M.; Ritala, M. Atomic Layer Deposition of MgF2 Thin Films Using TaF5 as a Novel Fluorine Source. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 5023–5028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lindgren, I. Effective Operators in the Atomic Hyperfine Interaction. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1984, 47, 345–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wen, T.-C.; Shetty, D.K. Birefringence and Grain-Size Effects on Optical Transmittance of Polycrystalline Magnesium Fluoride; Tustison, R.W., Ed.; SPIE: Orlando, FL, USA, 2009; p. 73020Z. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pilvi, T.; Hatanpää, T.; Puukilainen, E.; Arstila, K.; Bischoff, M.; Kaiser, U.; Kaiser, N.; Leskelä, M.; Ritala, M. Study of a Novel ALD Process for Depositing MgF2 Thin Films. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 5077–5083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hennessy, J.; Jewell, A.D.; Greer, F.; Lee, M.C.; Nikzad, S. Atomic Layer Deposition of Magnesium Fluoride via Bis (Ethylcyclopentadienyl) Magnesium and Anhydrous Hydrogen Fluoride. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Film. 2015, 33, 01A125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yusim, Y.; Moryson, Y.; Seipp, K.; Sann, J.; Henss, A. Challenges in XPS Analysis of PEO-LiTFSI-Based Solid Electrolytes: How to Overcome X-Ray-Induced Photodecomposition. Batter. Supercaps 2024, 7, e202400161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dodge, M.J. Refractive Properties of Magnesium Fluoride. Appl. Opt. 1984, 23, 1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Palik, E.D. (Ed.) Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 1985; Volume 1, ISBN 978-0125444200. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Temperature-dependent PEALD MgF2 growth mechanism: (a) unsaturated reactions at 100 °C, (b) self-limiting ALD window at 125–150 °C, and (c) decomposition-assisted CVD-like growth at 175–200 °C.
Figure 1. Temperature-dependent PEALD MgF2 growth mechanism: (a) unsaturated reactions at 100 °C, (b) self-limiting ALD window at 125–150 °C, and (c) decomposition-assisted CVD-like growth at 175–200 °C.
Chemistry 07 00147 g001
Figure 2. (a) PEALD system with PTFE-lined quartz ICP tube and in situ OES monitoring. (b) OES spectrum of SF6 plasma showing F radicals, SFx fragments, and S emission.
Figure 2. (a) PEALD system with PTFE-lined quartz ICP tube and in situ OES monitoring. (b) OES spectrum of SF6 plasma showing F radicals, SFx fragments, and S emission.
Chemistry 07 00147 g002
Figure 3. (a) Film thickness versus ALD cycles for MgF2 grown at 100–200 °C. (b) Growth per cycle versus temperature delineating three regimes.
Figure 3. (a) Film thickness versus ALD cycles for MgF2 grown at 100–200 °C. (b) Growth per cycle versus temperature delineating three regimes.
Chemistry 07 00147 g003
Figure 4. (ae) SEM and AFM images for MgF2 films deposited at 100–200 °C. (f) RMS roughness as a function of deposition temperature.
Figure 4. (ae) SEM and AFM images for MgF2 films deposited at 100–200 °C. (f) RMS roughness as a function of deposition temperature.
Chemistry 07 00147 g004
Figure 5. GIXRD patterns of the PEALD MgF2 films deposited at 100–200 °C.
Figure 5. GIXRD patterns of the PEALD MgF2 films deposited at 100–200 °C.
Chemistry 07 00147 g005
Figure 6. XPS analysis of PEALD MgF2 films on glass deposited at 100–200 °C: (a) survey spectra; (b) elemental atomic ratios (Mg, F, C, O); (c) F 1s core-level spectra; (d) C-F/(Mg-F + C-F) area fractions.
Figure 6. XPS analysis of PEALD MgF2 films on glass deposited at 100–200 °C: (a) survey spectra; (b) elemental atomic ratios (Mg, F, C, O); (c) F 1s core-level spectra; (d) C-F/(Mg-F + C-F) area fractions.
Chemistry 07 00147 g006
Figure 7. Wavelength-dependent refractive index of PEALD-MgF2 films grown at 100–200 °C (glass shown for reference).
Figure 7. Wavelength-dependent refractive index of PEALD-MgF2 films grown at 100–200 °C (glass shown for reference).
Chemistry 07 00147 g007
Figure 8. Transmittance spectra of PEALD-MgF2 films on glass deposited at 100–200 °C, compared with that of bare glass.
Figure 8. Transmittance spectra of PEALD-MgF2 films on glass deposited at 100–200 °C, compared with that of bare glass.
Chemistry 07 00147 g008
Figure 9. (a) Transmittance of uncoated, single- and double-sided PEALD-MgF2 (125 °C) coated glass, (b) CIE 1931 (x, y) chromaticity of transmitted color under D65 for single- and double-sided MgF2-coated glass.
Figure 9. (a) Transmittance of uncoated, single- and double-sided PEALD-MgF2 (125 °C) coated glass, (b) CIE 1931 (x, y) chromaticity of transmitted color under D65 for single- and double-sided MgF2-coated glass.
Chemistry 07 00147 g009
Table 1. PEALD-MgF2 thin film preparation parameters at various substrate temperatures, with the gas flow profile during a single deposition cycle shown on the left.
Table 1. PEALD-MgF2 thin film preparation parameters at various substrate temperatures, with the gas flow profile during a single deposition cycle shown on the left.
Chemistry 07 00147 i001ParameterValue
Mg(Cp)2 bubbler temperature (°C)90
Substrate temperature (°C)100–200
Mg(Cp)2 pulse time (s)3
Mg(Cp)2 purge time (s)6
Purge gas flow rate (sccm)100
SF6 plasma pulse time (s)10
SF6 plasma purge time (s)8
SF6 flow rate (sccm)50
Plasma power (W)800
Table 2. Color specs from absolute transmittance (CIE 1931 2°, D65).
Table 2. Color specs from absolute transmittance (CIE 1931 2°, D65).
SamplexyL*a*b*ΔE*ab vs. Bare
Bare glass0.31300.329496.80.00.20.00
Single-sided0.31380.330398.1−0.10.71.43
Double-sided0.31460.331398.8−0.11.22.24
* Values are rounded to 4 decimals for (x, y), 1 decimal for L*, a*, b*, and 2 decimals for ΔE.
Table 3. Comparison of MgF2 film properties achieved by PEALD in this work with other deposition methods.
Table 3. Comparison of MgF2 film properties achieved by PEALD in this work with other deposition methods.
Deposition MethodTemp. (°C)Refractive IndexRMS Roughness (nm)CrystallinityOptical PerformanceRef.
TALD3501.37 at 580 nm6.3poly-
crystalline
93% at 300 nm[29]
TALD3501.36 at 580 nm7.1poly-
crystalline
94.5% at 550 nm[26]
E-beam Evaporation2401.36 at 632.8 nm0.56amorphous-[9]
SputteringRT1.38 at 550 nm-poly-
crystalline
94.51% 300–1100 nm[19]
SputteringRT1.38 at 550 nm12nanocrystalline94.8% at 760 nm[11]
PEALD1251.37 ± 0.003 at 550 nm0.6amorphous95.4 ± 0.2% at 550 nmThis work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lien, S.-Y.; Lin, X.; Zhang, Z.-X.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, W.-X.; Hsu, C.-H.; Wang, C. Temperature-Dependent Growth Mechanisms and Optical Properties of MgF2 Thin Films Synthesized by Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition. Chemistry 2025, 7, 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry7050147

AMA Style

Lien S-Y, Lin X, Zhang Z-X, Zhang J, Zhu W-X, Hsu C-H, Wang C. Temperature-Dependent Growth Mechanisms and Optical Properties of MgF2 Thin Films Synthesized by Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition. Chemistry. 2025; 7(5):147. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry7050147

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lien, Shui-Yang, Xiao Lin, Zhi-Xuan Zhang, Jing Zhang, Wen-Xuan Zhu, Chia-Hsun Hsu, and Chen Wang. 2025. "Temperature-Dependent Growth Mechanisms and Optical Properties of MgF2 Thin Films Synthesized by Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition" Chemistry 7, no. 5: 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry7050147

APA Style

Lien, S.-Y., Lin, X., Zhang, Z.-X., Zhang, J., Zhu, W.-X., Hsu, C.-H., & Wang, C. (2025). Temperature-Dependent Growth Mechanisms and Optical Properties of MgF2 Thin Films Synthesized by Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition. Chemistry, 7(5), 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry7050147

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop