# Acoustical Treatments on Ventilation Ducts through Walls: Experimental Results and Novel Models

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Theory

## 3. Method

^{2}mock-up wall can be constructed (Figure 4a). The experimental part in [2] tested three different types of walls. Lab measurements yielded ${R}_{w}$ of 35, 46, and 54 dB according to ISO 717-1:2013 [41] and $STC$ of 35, 46, and 53 dB according to ASTM E413-16 [42]. The edges, between the mock-up wall and the heavy wall, were covered with sealant on all sides.

- External lagging with 50 mm stone wool, density of 100 kg/m
^{3}, closest to the wall with a length of 600 mm. - External lagging with 50 mm stone wool, density of 100 kg/m
^{3}, closest to the wall with a length of 1200 mm. - External lagging with 50 mm stone wool, density of 100 kg/m
^{3}, closest to the wall with a length of 1800 mm. - External lagging with 50 mm stone wool, density of 100 kg/m
^{3}, along the whole duct. - External lagging with 100 mm stone wool, density of 100 kg/m
^{3}, closest to the wall with a length of 1800 mm. The rest of the duct is covered with 50 mm stone wool, density of 100 kg/m^{3}.

- Wall A. Sound reduction index: ${R}_{w}=35\mathrm{dB}$ or sound transmission class: $STC=35\mathrm{dB}$
- Wall B. Sound reduction index: ${R}_{w}=46\mathrm{dB}$ or sound transmission class: $STC=46\mathrm{dB}$
- Wall C. Sound reduction index: ${R}_{w}=54\mathrm{dB}$ or sound transmission class: $STC=53\mathrm{dB}$

## 4. Theoretical Models with External Lagging

#### 4.1. Theoretical Models with External Lagging for Circular Ducts

#### 4.1.1. Theoretical Models When Circular Ventilation Ducts Are Partly Wrapped

#### 4.1.2. Theoretical Models When Circular Ventilation Ducts Are Completely Wrapped

#### 4.2. Theoretical Models with External Lagging for Rectangular Ducts

#### 4.2.1. Theoretical Models When Rectangular Ventilation Ducts Are Partly Wrapped

#### 4.2.2. Theoretical Models When Rectangular Ventilation Ducts Are Completely Wrapped

## 5. Results

#### 5.1. Measurement Results Compared to the Developed Theoretical Models

#### 5.2. Suspended Absorbent Ceilings: Estimated Calculations

## 6. Discussion

## 7. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Conflicts of Interest

## Appendix A

**Figure A1.**Theoretical models compared to measurements with external lagging as acoustic treatment. Ventilation duct with Ø315 mm through wall A with a sound reduction index of ${R}_{w}=$ 35 dB. External lagging is mounted at a partial length of 0.6 m (Treatment 1) with 50 mm stone wool, density of 100 kg/m

^{3}, closest to the wall.

**Figure A2.**Theoretical models compared to measurements with external lagging as acoustic treatment. Ventilation duct with Ø315 mm through wall B with a sound reduction index of ${R}_{w}=$ 46 dB. External lagging is mounted at partial lengths of 0.6–1.2 m (Treatment 1 and 2) with 50 mm stone wool, density of 100 kg/m

^{3}, closest to the wall.

**Figure A3.**Theoretical models compared to measurements with external lagging as acoustic treatment. Ventilation duct with Ø315 mm through wall A with a sound reduction index of ${R}_{w}=$ 35 dB. External lagging is mounted at partial lengths of 0.6–1.2 m (Treatment 1 and 2) with 50 mm stone wool, density of 100 kg/m

^{3}, closest to the wall.

**Figure A4.**Theoretical models compared to measurements with external lagging as acoustic treatment. Ventilation duct with Ø315 mm through wall B with a sound reduction index of ${R}_{w}=$ 46 dB. External lagging is mounted at partial lengths of 0.6–1.8 m (Treatment 1–3) and full length (Treatment 4) with 50 mm stone wool, density of 100 kg/m

^{3}, closest to the wall.

**Figure A5.**Theoretical models compared to measurements with external lagging as acoustic treatment. Ventilation duct with dimension: 700 × 250 mm through wall B with a sound reduction index of ${R}_{w}=$ 46 dB. External lagging is mounted at partial lengths of 0.6–1.8 m (Treatment 1–3) with 50 mm stone wool, density of 100 kg/m

^{3}, closest to the wall.

**Figure A6.**Estimated theory with suspended absorbent ceiling, Ceiling A, as acoustical treatment. Ventilation duct with dimensions of: Ø315, Ø630 and 700 × 250 mm through wall B with a sound reduction index of ${R}_{w}=$ 46 dB.

**Figure A7.**Estimated theory with suspended absorbent ceiling, Ceiling B, as acoustical treatment. Ventilation duct with dimensions of: Ø315, Ø630 and 700 × 250 mm through wall B with a sound reduction index of ${R}_{w}=$ 46 dB.

## Appendix B

Variable | Unit, SI |
---|---|

a | m |

b | m |

c_{0}, c_{L} | m/s |

d | m |

L | m |

M_{duct}, M_{wall} | m^{2} |

P | m |

q_{wrap} | kg/m^{2} |

S, S_{wall} | m^{2} |

Variable | Value: |

${f}_{1,315}$ | 638 Hz |

${f}_{1,630}$ | 319 Hz |

${f}_{1,700}$ | 245 Hz |

${f}_{e,315}$ | 336 Hz |

${f}_{e,630}$ | 168 Hz |

${f}_{R,315}$ | 5108 Hz |

${f}_{R,630}$ | 2554 Hz |

${f}_{L,700}$ | 1465 Hz |

## References

- Nilsson, E.; Vardaxis, N.-G.; Ménard, S.; Bard Hagberg, D. Sound Reduction of Ventilation Ducts through Walls: Experimental Results and Updated Models. Acoustics
**2021**, 3, 695–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nilsson, E. Hur Genomföring av Ventilationskanaler Påverkar Lättregelväggars Ljudisolering. Master’s Thesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Westerberg, G. On the sealing of circular holes in a thick wall for the purpose of sound insulation. Appl. Acoust.
**1971**, 4, 115–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yang, C.; Zhang, X.; Tao, F.; Lam, D.C. A study of the sound transmission mechanisms of a finite thickness opening without or with an acoustic seal. Appl. Acoust.
**2017**, 122, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kuo-Tsai, C. Study of acoustic transmission through apertures in a wall. Appl. Acoust.
**1995**, 46, 131–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Poblet-Puig, J.; Rodríguez-Ferran, A. Modal-based prediction of sound transmission through slits and openings between rooms. J. Sound Vib.
**2013**, 332, 1265–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Mechel, F.P. The acoustic sealing of holes and slits in walls. J. Sound Vib.
**1986**, 111, 297–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Trompette, N.; Barbry, J.L.; Sgard, F.; Nelisse, H. Sound transmission loss of rectangular and slit-shaped apertures: Experimental results and correlation with a modal model. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
**2009**, 125, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ramli, N.B. Analytical Modelling of Sound Transmission in a Lined Duct. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Cummings, A. Sound attenuation in ducts lined on two opposite walls with porous material, with some applications to splitters. J. Sound Vib.
**1976**, 49, 9–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tester, B.J. The propagation and attenuation of sound in lined ducts containing uniform or “plug” flow. J. Sound Vib.
**1973**, 28, 151–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cummings, A.; Astley, R.J. The effects of flanking transmission on sound attenuation in lined ducts. J. Sound Vib.
**1995**, 179, 617–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Howe, M.S. The attenuation of sound in a randomly lined duct. J. Sound Vib.
**1983**, 87, 83–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Astley, R.J.; Cummings, A. A finite element scheme for attenuation in ducts lined with porous material: Comparison with experiment. J. Sound Vib.
**1987**, 116, 239–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Astley, R.J.; Cummings, A.; Sormaz, N. A finite element scheme for acoustic propagation in flexible-walled ducts with bulk-reacting liners, and comparison with experiment. J. Sound Vib.
**1991**, 150, 119–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bibby, C.; Hodgson, M. Theoretical Analysis of lined-Duct sound attenuation. Can. Acoust.
**2014**, 41, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - ASHRAE. Handbook—HVAC Applications; American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc.: Atlanta, GA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Selamet, A.; Xu, M.B.; Lee, I.J.; Huff, N.T. Analytical approach for sound attenuation in perforated dissipative silencers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
**2004**, 115, 2091–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Bilawchuk, S.; Fyfe, K.R. Comparison and implementation of the various numerical methods used for calculating transmission loss in silencer systems. Appl. Acoust.
**2003**, 64, 903–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cummings, A. High Frequency Ray Acoustics Models for Duct Silencers. J. Sound Vib.
**1999**, 221, 681–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cummings, A.; Chang, I.J. Sound attenuation of a finite length dissipative flow duct silencer with internal mean flow in the absorbent. J. Sound Vib.
**1988**, 127, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kirby, R. Simplified Techniques for Predicting the Transmission Loss of a Circular Dissipative Silencer. J. Sound Vib.
**2001**, 243, 403–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Kirkby, R.; Mimani, A. Attenuating sound in large ductwork using reactive and dissipative silencers. In Proceedings of the Noise and Vibration Emerging Methods, NOVEM, Ibiza, Spain, 7–11 May 2018. [Google Scholar]
- ASTM E477-13; Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurements of Acoustical and Airflow Performance of Duct Liner Materials and Prefabricated Silencers. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2013.
- ISO 10848-2:2017; Acoustics—Laboratory and Field Measurement of Flanking Transmission for Airborne, Impact and Building Service Equipment Sound between Adjoining Rooms—Part 2: Application to Type B Elements When the Junction Has a Small Influence. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
- ASTM E1414/E1414M-21a; Standard Test Method for Airborne Sound Attenuation between Rooms Sharing a Common Ceiling Plenum. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
- Van Hout, G. The Acoustic Performance of Suspended Ceiling Systems. Master’s Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Van Hout, G.; Reeve, W. Effect of Plenum Absorption on Ceiling Attenuation. Available online: https://www.acoustics.org.nz/sites/www.acoustics.org.nz/files/journal/pdfs/Van%20Holt_G_NZA_2017.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2022).
- Halliwell, R.E.; Quirt, J.D. Controlling interoffice sound transmission through a suspended ceiling. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
**1991**, 90, 1446–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Van Hout, G.; Pearse, J.; Donohue, B. Relationship between flanking noise through a common ceiling plenum and plenum absorption. In Proceedings of the ACOUSTICS, Brisbane, Australia, 9–11 November 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Kruger, K. The Effect of Various Parameters on the Sound Isolation between Offices with Suspended Ceilings. Can. Acoust.
**1988**, 16, 9. [Google Scholar] - Cummings, A. Sound Transmission through Duct Walls. J. Sound Vib.
**2001**, 239, 731–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Hassan, O.A.B. Building Acoustics and Vibration; World Scientific Publishing Company: Singapore, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Cummings, A. The effects of external lagging on low frequency sound transmission through the walls of rectangular ducts. J. Sound Vib.
**1979**, 67, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Venkatesham, B.; Munjal, M.L.; Tiwari, M. Prediction of Breakout Noise from Acoustically Lagged Rectangular HVAC Ducts. Build. Acoust.
**2009**, 16, 313–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Reynolds, D.D. Chapter 11—Noise Control. In Hvac Systems Duct Design, 3rd ed.; Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors’ National Association: Chantilly, VA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Cummings, A.; Chang, I.J. A finite difference scheme for acoustic transmission through the walls of distorted circular ducts and comparison with experiment. J. Sound Vib.
**1986**, 104, 377–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ver, I.L. Prediction of Sound Transmission through Duct Walls; Breakout and Pickup; American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers Research Project: Atlanta, GA, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Cummings, A. Acoustic Noise Transmission through Duct Walls. ASHRAE Trans.
**1983**, 91, 48–61. [Google Scholar] - Cummings, A. Approximate asymptotic solutions for acoustic transmission through the walls of rectangular ducts. J. Sound Vib.
**1983**, 90, 211–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - ISO 717-1:2013; Acoustics—Rating of Sound Insulation in Buildings and of Building Elements—Part 1: Airborne Sound Insulation. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
- ASTM E413-16; Classification for Rating Sound Insulation. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016.
- ISO 11546-1:1995; Acoustics—Determination of Sound Insulation Performances of Enclosures—Part 1: Measurements under Laboratory Conditions (for Declaration Purposes). International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1995.

**Figure 1.**Illustration model of how sound travels from the sending room to the receiving room if only the surface area affects the sound transmission.

**Figure 2.**Illustration model of how sound travels from the sending room to the receiving room if the surface area and air diffusers affects the sound transmission.

**Figure 3.**Illustration model of how sound travels from the sending room to the receiving room if the surface area and air diffusers affects the sound transmission. Two areas on the ventilation duct in the sending room are marked with blue and green colors together with the letters a and b that describe different areas for acoustical treatments.

**Figure 4.**Pictures from the measurements in [2]: (

**a**) The finished mounted wall; (

**b**) Foam lining for rectangular duct; (

**c**) Cover cap for the circular duct: rubber lining, gypsum boards and sealant around the border; (

**d**) Cover cap for the rectangular duct: foam lining and gypsum boards.

**Figure 5.**Pictures from the measurements in [2] in one of the rooms: (

**a**) Circular 630 mm duct, treatment according to case 3; (

**b**) Circular 630 mm duct, treatment according to case 5; (

**c**) Circular 315 mm duct, treatment according to case 4; (

**d**) Rectangular duct, 700 × 250 mm, treatment according to case 4.

**Figure 6.**Theoretical models compared to measurements with external lagging as acoustic treatment. Ventilation duct with Ø315 mm through wall C with a sound reduction index of ${R}_{\mathrm{w}}=$ 54 dB. External lagging is mounted at partial lengths of 0.6–1.8 m (Treatment 1–3) and full length (Treatment 4) with 50 mm stone wool, density of 100 kg/m

^{3}, closest to the wall.

**Figure 7.**Theoretical models compared to measurements with external lagging as acoustic treatment. Ventilation duct with Ø630 mm through wall C with a sound reduction index of ${R}_{\mathrm{w}}=$ 54 dB. External lagging is mounted at partial lengths of 0.6–1.8 m (Treatment 1–3) and full length (Treatment 4 and 5) with 50 mm and 100 mm stone wool, density of 100 kg/m

^{3}, closest to the wall.

**Figure 8.**Theoretical models compared to measurements with external lagging as acoustic treatment. Ventilation duct with dimension: 700 × 250 mm through wall C with a sound reduction index of ${R}_{\mathrm{w}}=$ 54 dB. External lagging is mounted at partial lengths of 0.6–1.8 m (Treatment 1–3) and full length (Treatment 4 and 5) with 50 mm and 100 mm stone wool, density of 100 kg/m

^{3}, closest to the wall.

**Figure 9.**Estimated theory with a suspended absorbent ceiling, Ceiling A, as acoustical treatment. Ventilation duct with dimensions of Ø315, Ø630 and 700 × 250 mm through wall C with a sound reduction index of ${R}_{\mathrm{w}}=$ 54 dB.

**Figure 10.**Estimated theory with a suspended absorbent ceiling, Ceiling B, as acoustical treatment. Ventilation duct with dimensions of Ø315, Ø630 and 700 × 250 mm through wall C with a sound reduction index of ${R}_{\mathrm{w}}=$ 54 dB.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Nilsson, E.; Ménard, S.; Bard Hagberg, D.; Vardaxis, N.-G. Acoustical Treatments on Ventilation Ducts through Walls: Experimental Results and Novel Models. *Acoustics* **2022**, *4*, 276-296.
https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics4010017

**AMA Style**

Nilsson E, Ménard S, Bard Hagberg D, Vardaxis N-G. Acoustical Treatments on Ventilation Ducts through Walls: Experimental Results and Novel Models. *Acoustics*. 2022; 4(1):276-296.
https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics4010017

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Nilsson, Erik, Sylvain Ménard, Delphine Bard Hagberg, and Nikolaos-Georgios Vardaxis. 2022. "Acoustical Treatments on Ventilation Ducts through Walls: Experimental Results and Novel Models" *Acoustics* 4, no. 1: 276-296.
https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics4010017