Evaluating the Relationship Between Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Valvular Heart Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results
3.1. Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Aortic Valve Dysfunction
3.2. Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Mitral Valve Dysfunction
3.3. Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Triscuspid Valve Dysfunction
3.4. Other Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Valvular Diseases
4. Discussion and Narrative Synthesis
4.1. Exploring the Association Between Valvular Disease and Gastrointestinal Bleeding
4.2. Pathophysiology of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Valvular Disease
4.3. Risk Stratification and Prevention of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Valvular Disease
4.4. Management of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Valvular Disease
5. Conclusions and Future Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sami, S.S.; Al-Araji, S.A.; Ragunath, K. Review article: Gastrointestinal angiodysplasia—Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014, 39, 15–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baum, S.; Athanasoulis, C.A.; Waltman, A.C.; Galdabini, J.; Schapiro, R.H.; Warshaw, A.L.; Ottinger, L.W. Angiodysplasia of the right colon: A cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1977, 129, 789–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Junquera, F.; Saperas, E.; de Torres, I.; Vidal, M.T.; Malagelada, J.-R. Increased expression of angiogenic factors in human colonic angiodysplasia. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1999, 94, 1070–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Compeán, D.; Del Cueto-Aguilera, N.; Jiménez-Rodríguez, A.R.; González-González, J.A.; Maldonado-Garza, H.J. Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of gastrointestinal angiodysplasias: A critical review and view points. World J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 25, 2549–2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, S.; Bowers, N.; Dhoot, A.; Ho, E.C.; Ong, G.; Eckstein, J.; Edwards, J.; Fam, N.; Connelly, K.A. Natural history of severe tricuspid regurgitation: Outcomes after transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention compared to medical therapy. Int. J. Cardiol. 2020, 320, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blackshear, J.L.; Wysokinska, E.M.; Safford, R.E.; Thomas, C.S.; Shapiro, B.P.; Ung, S.; Stark, M.E.; Parikh, P.; Johns, G.S.; Chen, D. Shear stress-associated acquired von Willebrand syndrome in patients with mitral regurgitation. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2014, 12, 1966–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondal, S.; Hollander, K.N.; Ibekwe, S.O.; Williams, B.; Tanaka, K. Heyde Syndrome-Pathophysiology and Perioperative Implications. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2021, 35, 3331–3339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aldiabat, M.; Kilani, Y.; Alahmad, M.; Alhuneafat, L.; Aljabiri, Y.; Horoub, A.; Alabdallah, K.; Alrahamneh, H.; Manvar, A. Inpatient Outcomes of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia in Those with Aortic Stenosis. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2024, 58, 769–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hung, H.J.; Chung, C.S.; Tai, C.M.; Chang, C.W.; Tseng, C.M.; Huang, G.S.; Lin, M.C.; Huang, T.Y. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for rebleeding in uremic patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding undergoing deep enteroscopy: A multi-center retrospective study in Taiwan. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0277434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Waldschmidt, L.; Drolz, A.; Heimburg, P.; Goßling, A.; Ludwig, S.; Voigtländer, L.; Linder, M.; Schofer, N.; Reichenspurner, H.; Blankenberg, S.; et al. Heyde syndrome: Prevalence and outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2021, 110, 1939–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jehangir, A.; Pathak, R.; Ukaigwe, A.; Donato, A. Association of aortic valve disease with intestinal angioectasia: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 30, 438–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tamura, T.; Horiuchi, H.; Imai, M.; Tada, T.; Shiomi, H.; Kuroda, M.; Nishimura, S.; Takahashi, Y.; Yoshikawa, Y.; Tsujimura, A.; et al. Unexpectedly High Prevalence of Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis as Evaluated with a Novel Large Multimer Index. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2015, 22, 1115–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Selvam, S.N.; Bowman, M.; Inglis, M.; Kloosterman, R.; Grabell, J.; Casey, L.; Johri, A.M.; James, P. Patients with aortic stenosis have von Willebrand factor abnormalities and increased proliferation of endothelial colony forming cells. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 593–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jackson, C.S.; Gerson, L.B. Management of gastrointestinal angiodysplastic lesions (GIADs): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 109, 474–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caspar, T.; Jesel, L.; Desprez, D.; Grunebaum, L.; Samet, H.; Trinh, A.; Petit-Eisenmann, H.; Kindo, M.; Ohlmann, P.; Morel, O. Effects of transcutaneous aortic valve implantation on aortic valve disease-related hemostatic disorders involving von Willebrand factor. Can. J. Cardiol. 2015, 31, 738–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goltstein, L.; Rooijakkers, M.; Görtjes, N.; Akkermans, R.; Zegers, E.; Pisters, R.; van Wely, M.; van der Wulp, K.; Drenth, J.; van Geenen, E.; et al. Reduction of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients with Heyde Syndrome Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2022, 15, e011848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tjahjadi, C.; Wee, Y.; Hay, K.; Tesar, P.; Clarke, A.; Walters, D.L.; Bett, N. Heyde syndrome revisited: Anaemia and aortic stenosis. Intern. Med. J. 2017, 47, 814–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugino, S.; Inoue, K.; Zen, K.; Yashige, M.; Kobayashi, R.; Takamatsu, K.; Ito, N.; Iwai, N.; Hirose, R.; Doi, T.; et al. Gastrointestinal Angiodysplasia in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis: The Endoscopic Features of Heyde’s Syndrome. Digestion 2023, 104, 468–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanger, D.E.; Abdulla, A.H.; Wong, F.T.; Alipour, S.; Bressler, B.L.; Wood, D.A.; Webb, J.G. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A retrospective analysis. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2017, 90, E53–E61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manasrah, N.; Sattar, Y.; Patel, N.; Kambalapalli, S.; Duhan, S.; Pandya, K.K.; Najam, M.; Alsaud, A.; AlJaroudi, W.; Alraies, M.C. A Propensity-Matched National Analysis of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Outcome in Patients with Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Am. J. Cardiol. 2023, 205, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zahid, S.; Khan, M.Z.; Bapaye, J.; Altamimi, T.S.; Elkhapery, A.; Thakkar, S.; Nepal, M.; Rai, D.; Ullah, W.; Patel, H.P.; et al. Outcomes, Trends, and Predictors of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from the National Inpatient Sample). Am. J. Cardiol. 2022, 170, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Laflamme, M.; Mazine, A.; Demers, P.; Lamarche, Y.; Ibrahim, R.; Asgar, A.; Cartier, R. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation by the left axillary approach: A single-center experience. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2014, 97, 1549–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brown, J.A.; Sultan, I.; Lewis, J.; Thoma, F.; Kliner, D.; Serna-Gallegos, D.; Sanon, S.; Mulukutla, S.; Navid, F.; Toma, C. Impact of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation on Severe Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients with Aortic Stenosis. Am. J. Cardiol. 2022, 177, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yerasi, C.; Tripathi, B.; Wang, Y.; Forrestal, B.J.; Case, B.C.; Khan, J.M.; Torguson, R.; Ben-Dor, I.; Satler, L.F.; Garcia-Garcia, H.M.; et al. National trends and 30-day readmission rates for next-day-discharge transcatheter aortic valve replacement: An analysis from the Nationwide Readmissions Database, 2012–2016. Am. Heart J. 2021, 231, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iyengar, A.; Sanaiha, Y.; Aguayo, E.; Seo, Y.J.; Dobaria, V.; Toppen, W.; Shemin, R.J.; Benharash, P. Comparison of Frequency of Late Gastrointestinal Bleeding with Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement. Am. J. Cardiol. 2018, 122, 1727–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Desai, R.; Parekh, T.; Singh, S.; Patel, U.; Fong, H.K.; Zalavadia, D.; Savani, S.; Doshi, R.; Sachdeva, R.; Kumar, G. Alarming Increasing Trends in Hospitalizations and Mortality with Heyde’s Syndrome: A Nationwide Inpatient Perspective (2007 to 2014). Am. J. Cardiol. 2019, 123, 1149–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goltstein, L.C.M.J.; Rooijakkers, M.J.P.; Hoeks, M.; Li, W.W.L.; van Wely, M.H.; Rodwell, L.; van Royen, N.; Drenth, J.P.H.; van Geenen, E.-J.M. Effectiveness of aortic valve replacement in Heyde syndrome: A meta-analysis. Eur. Heart J. 2023, 44, 3168–3177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matsuura, K.; Yamamoto, H.; Miyata, H.; Matsumiya, G.; Motomura, N. Mechanical vs Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients on Dialysis: Long-term Outcomes. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2023, 116, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kytö, V.; Myllykangas, M.E.; Sipilä, J.; Niiranen, T.J.; Rautava, P.; Gunn, J. Long-term Outcomes of Mechanical vs Biologic Aortic Valve Prosthesis in Patients Older than 70 Years. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2019, 108, 1354–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rashvand, J.; Ostovar, R.; Schroeter, F.; Hartrumpf, M.; Kuehnel, R.U.; Albes, J.M. Results of Four-Stented Biological Aortic Valves and How They Compare to PARTNER-3. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2023, 71, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miura, S.; Inoue, K.; Kumamaru, H.; Yamashita, T.; Hanyu, M.; Shirai, S.; Ando, K. Clinical impact of pathology-proven etiology of severely stenotic aortic valves on mid-term outcomes in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0229721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Melgaard, L.; Overvad, T.F.; Jensen, M.; Christensen, T.D.; Lip, G.Y.H.; Larsen, T.B.; Nielsen, P.B. Effectiveness and Safety of NOAC Versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Aortic Stenosis. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e022628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Mieghem, N.M.; Unverdorben, M.; Hengstenberg, C.; Möllmann, H.; Mehran, R.; López-Otero, D.; Nombela-Franco, L.; Moreno, R.; Nordbeck, P.; Thiele, H.; et al. Edoxaban versus Vitamin K Antagonist for Atrial Fibrillation after TAVR. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 2150–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, T.Y.; Svensson, L.G.; Wen, J.; Vekstein, A.; Gerdisch, M.; Rao, V.U.; Moront, M.; Johnston, D.; Lopes, R.D.; Chavez, A.; et al. Apixaban or Warfarin in Patients with an On-X Mechanical Aortic Valve. NEJM EÉvid. 2023, 2, EVIDoa2300067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meindl, C.; Paulus, M.; Koller, T.; Rogalski, D.; Hamerle, M.; Schach, C.; Buchner, S.; Zeman, F.; Maier, L.S.; Debl, K.; et al. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome and factor VIII in patients with moderate to severe mitral regurgitation undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair. Clin. Cardiol. 2021, 44, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lane, C.E.; Eleid, M.F.; Holmes, D.R., Jr. An under-recognized high-risk atrial fibrillation population: Analyzing transcatheter mitral valve repair patients for left atrial appendage closure device application. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2019, 94, 274–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tabrizi, N.S.; Doshi, I.; Shapeton, A.D.; Stout, P.A.; Jones, S.B.; El-Hajjar, M.; Torosoff, M.; Musuku, S.R. Gastrointestinal Complications After Transesophageal Echocardiography for Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: Insights From a Large Contemporary Cohort. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2023, 37, 1922–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grasso, C.; Rubbio, A.P.; Capodanno, D.; Buccheri, S.; Di Salvo, M.E.; Cannata, S.; Scandura, S.; Mangiafico, S.; Farruggio, S.; Salerno, T.; et al. Incidence, Timing, Causes and Predictors of Early and Late Re-Hospitalization in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair with the MitraClip System. Am. J. Cardiol. 2018, 121, 1253–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.Z.; Zahid, S.; Khan, M.U.; Kichloo, A.; Jamal, S.; Khan, A.M.; Ullah, W.; Sattar, Y.; Munir, M.B.; Balla, S. Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Patients with vs Without Pulmonary Hypertension (from the National Inpatient Sample). Am. J. Cardiol. 2021, 153, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fukunaga, N.; Miyakoshi, C.; Sakata, R.; Koyama, T. Impact of valve type on outcomes after redo mitral valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2018, 27, 322–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rokui, S.; Gottschalk, B.; Peng, D.; Groenewoud, R.; Ye, J. Long-term outcomes of isolated mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in different age groups of propensity-matched patients. Eur. J. Cardio-Thorac. Surg. 2024, 66, ezae245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Uchino, G.; Murakami, H.; Mukohara, N.; Tanaka, H.; Nomura, Y.; Miyahara, S.; Kawashima, M.; Fujisue, J.; Tonoki, S. Very-long-term outcomes of mechanical valves in mitral position focusing on valve-related complications. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2022, 35, ivac146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Belahnech, Y.; Del Blanco, B.G.; Ferreira-González, I.; Ródenas-Alesina, E.; Alonso-Cotoner, C.; Galian-Gay, L.; Bermudez-Ramos, M.; Vila-Olives, R.; Martí-Aguasca, G. Impact of percutaneous mitral paravalvular leak closure on the natural history of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding. EuroIntervention 2024, 20, e329–e331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, Y.; Kim, M.; Kim, J.; Cho, M.S.; Lee, S.; Song, J.M.; Kim, D.H. Use of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Significant Tricuspid Regurgitation. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2024, 13, e032272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nakatsu, T.; Tamura, N.; Yanagi, S.; Kyo, S.; Koshiji, T.; Sakata, R. Hemorrhage as a life-threatening complication after valve replacement in end-stage renal disease patients. Gen. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2015, 63, 386–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blackshear, J.L.; McRee, C.W.; Safford, R.E.; Pollak, P.M.; Stark, M.E.; Thomas, C.S.; Rivera, C.E.; Wysokinska, E.M.; Chen, D. von Willebrand Factor Abnormalities and Heyde Syndrome in Dysfunctional Heart Valve Prostheses. JAMA Cardiol. 2016, 1, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Briasoulis, A.; Inampudi, C.; Akintoye, E.; Alvarez, P.; Panaich, S.; Vaughan-Sarrazin, M. Safety and Efficacy of Novel Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Medicare Beneficiaries with Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2018, 7, e008773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, L.; Doctor, J.N.; Adams, J.L.; Romley, J.A.; Nguyen, L.A.; An, J.; Lee, M.S. Comparison of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Bioprosthetic Heart Valves. Am. J. Cardiol. 2021, 146, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suppah, M.; Kamal, A.; Saadoun, R.; Baradeiya, A.M.A.; Abraham, B.; Alsidawi, S.; Sorajja, D.; Fortuin, F.D.; Arsanjani, R. An Evidence-Based Approach to Anticoagulation Therapy Comparing Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Bioprosthetic Valves: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Network Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Cardiol. 2023, 206, 132–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; He, F.; Shi, G. Success rates and prognosis of heart valvuloplasty and valve replacement performed for elderly patients. Pak. J. Med Sci. 2015, 31, 1033–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blackshear, J.L. Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Native and Prosthetic Valve Disease. Curr. Treat. Options Cardiovasc. Med. 2018, 20, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lip, G.Y.H.; Banerjee, A.; Boriani, G.; Chiang, C.E.; Fargo, R.; Freedman, B.; Lane, D.A.; Ruff, C.T.; Turakhia, M.; Werring, D.; et al. Antithrombotic Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest 2018, 154, 1121–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Urban, P.; Mehran, R.; Colleran, R.; Angiolillo, D.J.; A Byrne, R.; Capodanno, D.; Cuisset, T.; Cutlip, D.; Eerdmans, P.; Eikelboom, J.; et al. Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A consensus document from the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk. Eur. Heart J. 2019, 40, 2632–2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.W.; Katz, P.O. Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs, Anticoagulation, and Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2021, 37, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaiyana, P.; Techathuvanan, K.; Sethasine, S. Nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants with proton pump inhibitor cotherapy ameliorated the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 17329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, K.J.; Hernández-Díaz, S.; García Rodríguez, L.A. Acid suppressants reduce risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on antithrombotic or anti-inflammatory therapy. Gastroenterology 2011, 141, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Imamura, T.; Nguyen, A.; Rodgers, D.; Kim, G.; Raikhelkar, J.; Sarswat, N.; Kalantari, S.; Smith, B.; Chung, B.; Narang, N.; et al. Omega-3 Therapy Is Associated with Reduced Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device. Circ. Heart Fail. 2018, 11, e005082, Erratum in: Circ. Heart Fail. 2018, 11, e000030. https://doi.org/10.1161/HHF.0000000000000030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, S.; Islam, E.; Cevik, C.; Attaya, H.; Otahbachi, M.; Nugent, K. Aortic stenosis and angiodysplastic gastrointestinal bleeding: Heyde’s disease. Heart Lung 2012, 41, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pate, G.E.; Chandavimol, M.; Naiman, S.C.; Webb, J.G. Heyde’s syndrome: A review. J. Heart Valve Dis. 2004, 13, 701–712. [Google Scholar]
- D’Souza, P.M.; Blostein, M.D. Diagnosis of Heyde’s syndrome by abnormal closure times despite normal von Willebrand’s activity. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 2011, 22, 622–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerson, L.B.; Fidler, J.L.; Cave, D.R.; Leighton, J.A. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Small Bowel Bleeding. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 110, 1265–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thompson, J.L., 3rd; Schaff, H.V.; Dearani, J.A.; Park, S.J.; Sundt, T.M., 3rd; Suri, R.M.; Blackshear, J.L.; Daly, R.C. Risk of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding after aortic valve replacement in patients with Heyde syndrome. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2012, 144, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, L.; Wu, K.; Ou, W.; Su, X.; Sun, G.; Wang, W.; Xu, Q.; Wang, B. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for patients with heyde syndrome: A literature review of case reports. Heliyon 2023, 9, e17952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Otto, C.M.; Nishimura, R.A.; Bonow, R.O.; Carabello, B.A.; Erwin, J.P., 3rd; Gentile, F.; Jneid, H.; Krieger, E.V.; Mack, M.; McLeod, C.; et al. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2021, 143, e35–e71, Erratum in: Circulation 2021, 143, e784. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Famularo, G.; Marrollo, M. Of aortic valve and bleeding: Heyde’s syndrome. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2020, 38, 2493.e1–2493.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becq, A.; Sidhu, R.; Goltstein, L.C.M.J.; Dray, X. Recent advances in the treatment of refractory gastrointestinal angiodysplasia. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2024, 12, 1128–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Virk, Z.M.; Song, A.B.; Badran, Y.R.; Al-Samkari, H. Systemic bevacizumab as salvage therapy for persistent severe bleeding and anemia in heyde syndrome following aortic valve replacement. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2022, 54, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, A.B.; Sakhuja, R.; Gracin, N.M.; Weinger, R.; Kasthuri, R.S.; Al-Samkari, H. Systemic bevacizumab for refractory bleeding and transfusion-dependent anemia in Heyde syndrome. Blood Adv. 2021, 5, 3850–3854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Author, Year | Valvular Disorder | Study Type | Number of Patients | Outcomes Measured | Groups | Study Period | Notable Outcomes | Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aldiabat et al., 2024 [8] | AS | Retrospective Observational | n = 85,090 patients with GAVE | Incidence of GIB due to GAVE | AS (n = 5315) vs. No AS (n = 79,775) | 2016–2019 | Patients with AS have a 2-fold increase in the risk of development of GAVE (aOR 2.08, 95% CI 1.94–2.22, p < 0.001). However, no difference in mortality was noted. | A strong association between AS and GAVE exists. |
Hung et al., 2022 [9] | AS | Retrospective Observational | n = 78 uremic patients with persistent or recurrent bleeding of unknown origin after negative endoscopy undergoing push enteroscopy | Rebleeding rates and reasons | - | 2010–2017 | The rebleeding rate was 29.5%, with angiodysplasia as the most common etiology (74.6%) and the most common site being the jejunum (50.8%). Angiodysplasia and valvular heart disease were associated with a higher rebleeding rate (p < 0.05). | Jejunal angiodysplasia is a frequent etiology of unknown bleeding in uremic patients. |
Waldschmidt et al., 2021 [10] | TAVI | Prospective Observational | n = 2548 TAVI patients with Heyde syndrome | Outcomes of pts with Heyde syndrome including bleeding complications and the recurrence of GIB | - | 2008–2017 | A history of GIB prior to TAVI was detected in 190 patients (7.5%). Among them, 47 patients were diagnosed with HS (1.8%). Heyde patients required blood transfusions more frequently compared to non-Heyde patients during index hospitalization (50.0% vs. 31.9%, p = 0.03). Recurrent GIB was detected in 39.8% of Heyde compared to 21.2% of non-Heyde patients one year after TAVI (p = 0.03). In patients diagnosed with HS and recurrent GIB after TAVI, the rate of residual ≥ mild paravalvular leakage was higher compared to those without recurrent bleeding (73.3% vs. 38.1%, p = 0.05). | Residual paravalvular leakage following TAVI may be associated with higher rates of recurrent GIB. |
Jehangir et al., 2017 [11] | AS | Retrospective Observational | n = 32,079 patients with gastrointestinal angiodysplasia | Incidence of GIB and aortic valve disease | - | 2011 | A total of 7.02% of pts with angiodysplasia-related GIB had AS. The unadjusted odds of aortic valve disease associated with bleeding intestinal angioectasia versus those without bleeding angioectasia were 4.95 (95% CI: 4.43–5.54, p < 0.001) and 2.37 (95% CI 2.10–2.66, p < 0.001) after adjusting for age and known risk factors. | A strong association between aortic valve disease and bleeding intestinal angioectasia exists. |
Tamura et al., 2015 [12] | AS | Prospective Observational | n = 31 severe AS patients | Analysis of the multimeric structure of VWF | - | 2015 | The loss of vWF multimer was detected in 67.7%. A total of 38.7% had Heyde syndrome. AVR was performed in 7 pts and resulted in a significant hemoglobin improvement (7.5 g/dL pre-op vs. 12.4 d/dL post-op, p < 0.0001). | The prevalence of acquired von Willebrand syndrome in patients with AS is high and should be considered in pts with AS who have anemia. |
Selvam et al., 2020 [13] | AS | Prospective Cohort | n = 29 AVR patients | Plasma VWFAg, VWFAct, propeptide, collagen binding, multimers, factor VIII coagulant activity, ADAMTS13 activity before AVR, 3–5 days after, and 6 months after | n = 29 AVR patients vs. n = 10 controls | 2020 | AS patients exhibited quantitative and qualitative abnormalities of VWF including significantly increased VWF antigen, activity, and propeptide levels following surgery (p < 0.01). Increased high-molecular-weight VWF multimers were observed at all time points and, in particular, 3 to 5 days after surgery (mean 14% ± 6%) relative to before (mean 10% ± 4%). | Hemostatic changes in AS patients are present before valve replacement surgery and these persist long after surgery has occurred. |
Jackson et al., 2014 [14] | AS | Systematic Review with Meta-analysis | n = 831 patients with gastrointestinal angiodysplasia from 22 studies | Cessation of bleeding | Endoscopic therapy (n = 623) vs. Hormonal therapy (n = 63) vs. Somatostatin analog (n = 72) vs. AVR (n = 73) | 1970–2013 | Hormonal therapy was not effective for bleeding cessation (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.5–1.96). Endoscopic therapy was effective as initial therapy, but the pooled recurrence bleeding rate was 36% (95% CI 28–44%) over a mean (+/-s.d.) of 22+/-13 months. The event rate for rebleeding increased to 45% (95% CI 37–52%) when studies including only small-bowel GIADs were included (n = 341). The pooled OR of somatostatin analog therapy was 14.5 (95% CI: 5.9–36) for bleeding cessation. The event rate for rebleeding in those treated with AVR was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.11–0.30) over a mean follow-up period of 4 years postoperatively. | Endoscopic intervention may not offer enough therapeutic value as compared to AVR in pts with AS and GIB. |
Caspar et al., 2015 [15] | AS | Prospective Observational | n = 49 patients with severe AS before and after TAVI | VWFAct, survival, bleeding complications | - | 2012–2013 | The mean aortic transvalvular gradient was negatively correlated with the levels of VWFAg (p < 0.05), VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (p = 0.006), and VWFCB (p = 0.005). One week after the procedure, a significant increase in VWFAg (3.32 vs. 2.29 IU/mL, p < 0.001), VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (2.98 vs. 1.86 IU/mL, p < 0.001), and VWFCB (3.16 vs. 2.16 IU/mL, p < 0.001) was observed. | Hemostasis parameters improve after TAVI, especially in those with pre-existing abnormalities. |
Goltstein et al., 2022 [16] | AVR | Retrospective Observational | n = 70 TAVI patients with Heyde syndrome | Rates of GIB pre- and post-TAVI | - | 2008–2020 | The rate of GIB improved after TAVI after the first year (62% of patients, 95% CI, 50–74%). Bleeding episodes decreased from 3.2 (95% CI 2.5–4.2) to 1.6 (95% CI 1.2–2.2, p = 0.001). Hemoglobin levels increased from 10.3 (95% CI 10.0–10.8) to 11.3 (95% CI 10.8–11.6) g/dL (p = 0.007). Between 1 and 5 years after TAVI, 83% (95% CI 72–92%) no longer experienced gastrointestinal bleeding. | GIB rates improve following TAVI in patients with Heyde syndrome. |
Tjahjadi et al., 2017 [17] | AS | Retrospective Cohort | n = 9562 severe AS patients | Prevalence of anemia | AVR (n = 1537) vs. CABG (n = 8025) | 2002–2014 | In the AVR group, 30.1% were anemic, compared (95% CI 27.9–32.5%) to 16.2% (95% CI 15.4–17.0%) in the CABG group. The adjusted marginal mean hemoglobin value was 135.6 g/L in AVR patients compared to 137.3 g/L in CABG patients. | The prevalence of anemia is higher in patients with AS who underwent AVR compared to those who undergo CABG. |
Sugino et al., 2023 [18] | AS | Retrospective Observational | n = 325 patients who underwent TAVI with severe AS | Status of anemia and endoscopic features | - | 2016–2019 | The rates of moderate/severe anemia (hemoglobin < 11 g/dL) were 52%, and it was associated with significantly more angiodysplasia (38.3% vs. 7.7%, p < 0.0001) and active bleeding (23.4% vs. 0%; p < 0.01). Angiodysplasia was detected in 21 patients (stomach, n = 9; small intestine, n = 5, and colon, n = 10). | Angiodysplasia is associated with moderate/severe anemia in AS. |
Stanger et al., 2017 [19] | TAVI | Retrospective Observational | n = 841 TAVI patients | Risk of severe upper GIB | - | 2005–2014 | The risk of upper GIB in TAVI patients was 2%, which increased 10-fold with triple antithrombotic therapy (11.8% vs. 1.0%) compared to those without any antithrombotic therapy. Endoscopy findings demonstrated five high-risk esophageal lesions including erosive esophageal ulcers, visible vessels at the GE junction, erosions at the distal esophagus, and an actively bleeding esophageal ring that had been intubated through by the TEE probe. | TAVI is associated with a moderate risk of severe upper GIB which increased significantly with triple antithrombotic therapy. |
Manasrah et al., 2023 [20] | TAVI | Retrospective Observational | n = 320,353 TAVI patients | GIB and non-GIB cohorts in patients with TAVI during index hospitalization and at 30, 90, and 180 days after discharge | - | 2016–2020 | A total of 6193 patients were readmitted for GIB between 2016 and 2020, with higher readmission rates at 30, 90, and 180 days observed in those patients with GIB (aOR 6.35, 95% CI 5.37–7.52, p < 0.0001). GIB was also associated with higher in-hospital mortality (aOR 6.35, 95% CI 5.37–7.52, p < 0.0001). | Patients with TAVI who develop GIB have higher readmission and in-hospital mortality rates. |
Zahid et al., 2022 [21] | TAVI | Retrospective Cohort | n = 216,023 TAVI patients | Incidence and predictors of GIB | GIB (n = 2188) vs. Propensity-matched controls (n = 2190) | 2011–2018 | Arteriovenous malformation was associated with the highest odds of having a gastrointestinal bleed (OR 24.8, 95% CI 17.13–35.92). Peptic ulcer disease was associated with an eightfold increase in the risk of bleeding (OR 8.74, 95% CI 6.69–11.43), followed closely by colorectal cancer (OR 7.89, 95% CI 5.33–11.70). Other comorbidities that were associated with higher propensity-matched rates of GIB were chronic kidney disease (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14–1.41), congestive heart failure (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.06–1.32), liver disease (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.53–2.19), end-stage renal disease (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.75–2.47), atrial fibrillation (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.49–1.78), and lung cancer (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.77–4.41). Patients with GIB had higher propensity-matched rates of mortality than those without GIB (12.1% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.01). Patients with GIB had a higher median cost of stay (USD 68,779 vs. USD 46,995, p < 0.01) and a longer length of hospital stay (11 vs. 3 days, p < 0.01). | Health care use and mortality are higher in hospitalizations of TAVI with a GIB. Baseline comorbidities like peptic ulcer disease, chronic kidney disease, liver disease, atrial fibrillation, and colorectal cancer are significant predictors of this adverse event. |
Laflamme et al., 2014 [22] | TAVI | Retrospective Observational | n = 18 severe AS patients who underwent TAVI | Clinical outcomes of TAVI with left axillary approach | - | 2010–2012 | The axillary approach has a higher procedural success rate and lower rates of complications, but in one case, upper GIB was seen. | The axillary approach may be an alternative approach for TAVI while noting a risk of UGIB. |
Brown et al., 2022 [23] | AS | Retrospective Observational | n = 1192 patients with severe AS who underwent TAVI | Frequency of GIB | - | 2011–2018 | Of the 1192 patients who underwent TAVI, 164 developed severe GIB. A total of 130 (79.3%) had resolution of GIB after TAVI. | TAVI is associated with GIB improvements in patients with severe AS. |
Yerasi et al., 2020 [24] | TAVI | Retrospective Observational | n = 49,742 TAVI patients | 30-day readmission rates with next-day discharge | - | 2012–2016 | The rate of next-day discharges post-TAVI increased from 1.5% in 2012 to 12.2% in 2016, with similar readmission rates. In 2016, there was a significantly higher incidence of GIB. | The rates of next-day discharges and GIB in TAVI patients have increased from 2012 to 2016. |
Iyengar et al., 2018 [25] | AS | Retrospective Observational | n = 353,370 patients with severe AS who underwent TAVI or SAVR | Incidence of late GIB | TAVI (n = 43,357) vs. SAVR (n = 310,013) | 2011–2014 | More pts with TAVI were re-hospitalized with GIB as compared to SAVR (aOR 1.54, 95% CI 1.38–1.71, p < 0.001). | TAVI is associated with more frequent readmissions for late GIB than SAVR. |
Desai et al., 2019 [26] | AS | Retrospective Observational | n = 130,487 patients with AS hospitalized for GIB related to Heyde syndrome | Trends in all-cause in-hospital mortality | - | 2007–2014 | Hospitalizations (48 to 62 per 100,000) and all-cause inpatient mortality (3.7 to 4.54 per 100,000) increased compared to those with AS and without Heyde syndrome. All-cause mortality (6.9% vs. 4.1%), LOS (∼7.0 vs. 5.8 days), and hospitalization charges (USD 58,519.31 vs. USD 57,598.67) were higher in HS (p < 0.001). TAVI patients showed lower rates of stroke (1.7% vs.10.0%) and blood transfusion (1.7% vs. 11.7%), a shorter LOS (18.3 vs. 23.9 days; p < 0.001), and more routine discharges (21.7% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.01) compared to SAVR. | Higher rates of hospitalization and mortality were seen in patients with Heyde syndrome between 2007 and 2014. TAVI has improved stroke, transfusion rates, LOS, and routine discharges compared to SAVR. |
Goltstein et al., 2023 [27] | AVR | Systematic Review with Meta-analysis | n = 1054 patients with AS who underwent TAVI or SAVR | Recovery of acquired von Willebrand syndrome within 24 h, 24 to 72 h, 3 to 21 days, and 4 weeks to 2 years after aortic valve AVR | - | Up to Oct 25th of 2022 | AVR led to the recovery of vWF deficiency in 85.9% (95% CI, 79.1–90.7%; I2 = 26%) of patients within 24 h post-procedure, 89.5% (74.1–96.2%; I2 = 80%) between 24 and 72 h, 92.2% (84.0–96.3%; I2 = 58%) between 3 and 21 days, and 87.4% (67.2–95.9%; I2 = 84%) between 4 weeks and 2 years. AVR was also linked to a complete cessation of GIB in 72.8% (95% CI 62.2–81.3%; I2 = 59%) of patients, with follow-up periods ranging from a median of 12 to 108 months. | AVR is associated with rapid recovery of bleeding diathesis in Heyde syndrome. |
Matsuura et al., 2023 [28] | AVR | Retrospective Observational | n = 1529 AVR patients | Primary: All-cause mortality Secondary: cerebral infarction, cerebral bleeding, GIB | Bioprosthetic valve (n = 837) vs. Mechanical valve (n = 692) | 2010–2012 | The Cox regression model showed no significant difference in long-term survival between the groups (mechanical valve: HR 0.895, 95% CI 0.719–1.113, p = 0.318). The incidences of cerebral infarction and prosthetic valve failure were similar between the groups. Cerebral bleeding (HR 2.143, 95% CI 1.125–4.080, p = 0.002) and GIB (HR 2.071, 95% CI 1.243–3.451, p = 0.0005) were more frequent in the mechanical valve group. | AVR with mechanical valves has a higher risk of GIB compared to bioprosthetic. |
Kyto et al., 2019 [29] | AVR | Retrospective Observational | n = 4227 SAVR patients age > 70 | 10-year survival after operation | Mechanical valve (n = 296) vs. bioprosthetic valve (n = 3931) | 2004–2014 | The 10-year major bleeding rates were 37.0% with mechanical valves and 18.8% with biologic valves (HR, 1.77, 95% CI 1.25–2.49; p = 0.001; NNH = 7.4). GIB was significantly more frequent with mechanical valve prosthesis (26.5% vs. 8.9%; HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.63–4.23, p < 0.001). | Bioprostheses should be considered over mechanical prostheses in patients > 70 due to lower bleeding risks. |
Rashvand et al., 2023 [30] | AVR | Retrospective Observational | n = 1034 patients receiving stented bioprosthetic valves | Early and late mortality | - | 2011–2019 | Early mortality was 6.1%, 1-year mortality was 11.2%, and 5-year mortality was 19.9%. Postoperative GIB was more associated with early mortality. Eight patients had GIB in the early mortality group (OR 51, 95% CI: 10.068–258.339, p < 0.001). | In-hospital GIB carried a high mortality risk in post-bioprosthetic AVR patients. |
Miura et al., 2020 [31] | SAVR | Retrospective Observational | n = 201 SAVR patients | Primary: All-cause mortality and cardiac events Secondary: Adverse events, including GIB | Post-inflammatory (n = 28) vs. Congenital (n = 35) vs. Calcific/degenerative (n = 138) | 2012–2015 | The calcific/degenerative group, compared to the post-inflammatory group, was independently linked to a higher risk of cardiac events (HR 4.45, 95%CI 1.07–18.4, p = 0.04) and combined adverse events (HR 3.59, 95% CI 1.30–9.88, p = 0.01). Risks for combined adverse events were significantly higher in the calcific/degenerative group (HR 5.69, 95% CI 1.87–17.2, p = 0.002) and congenital group (HR 4.13, 95% CI 1.20–14.2, p = 0.02) after adjustments for age, sex, and previous procedures. | The etiology of AS could be used to predict mid-term outcomes and GIB risk after AVR. |
Melgaard et al., 2021 [32] | AS | Retrospective Observational | n = 3726 AS patients with atrial fibrillation | Risk of thromboembolism and major bleeding | NOAC (n = 2357 patients) vs. warfarin (n = 1369 patients) | 2013–2018 | The aHR for thromboembolism and major bleeding were 1.62 (95% CI 1.08–2.45) and 0.73 (0.59–0.91) for NOAC compared with warfarin in the intention-to-treat analyses. | NOAC may be superior to warfarin in terms of bleeding profile in patients with AS and atrial fibrillation. |
Van Mieghem et al., 2021 [33] | TAVI | RCT | n = 1426 severe AS patients who underwent TAVI | Composite of adverse events (all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, systemic thromboembolism, valve thrombosis, or major bleeding) | Edoxaban (n = 713) vs. Warfarin (n = 713) | 2017–2020 | More patients in the edoxaban group experienced major GIB compared to the warfarin group (56 [5.4 per 100 person-years] vs. 27 [2.7 per 100 person-years]; HR, 2.03, 95% CI 1.28–3.22), despite similar rates of proton pump inhibitor use (71.7% vs. 69.0%). There was one fatal case of major gastrointestinal bleeding in the edoxaban group. Among those with major GIB, 82% (46 of 56) in the edoxaban group and 96% (26 of 27) in the warfarin group received proton pump inhibitors. | Edoxaban is non-inferior to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent TAVI. |
Wang et al., 2023 [34] | SAVR | RCT | n = 863 pts with X-mechanical AVR | Primary: Rates of valve thrombosis or valve-related thromboembolism Secondary: Major bleeding events | Apixaban (n = 433) vs. Warfarin (n = 430) | 2020–2022 | The trial was stopped due to an excess of thromboembolic events in the apixaban group. A total of 26 primary end-point events occurred, 20 (in 16 participants) in the apixaban group (4.2%/patient-year, 95% CI 2.3–6.0) and 6 (in 6 participants) in the warfarin group (1.3%/patient-year, 95% CI 0.3–2.3). The difference in primary end-point rates between the apixaban and warfarin groups was 2.9 (95% CI 0.8–5.0). Major bleeding rates were 3.6%/patient-year with apixaban and 4.5%/patient-year with warfarin, with more major GI bleeding. | Apixaban is inferior to warfarin in the prevention of thromboemboli in patients with X-mechanical valves but is associated with lower major bleeding and higher GIB rates. |
Author, Year | Valvular Disorder | Study Type | Number of Patients | Outcomes Measured | Groups | Study Period | Notable Outcomes | Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Blackshear et al., 2014 [6] | MR | Prospective Cohort | n = 53 patients with native MR | VWFAct | Mild (n = 13), moderate (n = 14), severe (n = 26) MR | 2010–2014 | More VWF shearing occurred with high degrees of MR. Nine patients (17%) reported clinically significant GIB, and seven had intestinal angiodysplasia and transfusion-dependent Heyde syndrome. All measures of VWF function improved with mitral valve repair. | The risk of GIB increases with MR severity. Acquired VWF syndrome may be reversible with mitral valve surgery and lead to lower rates of GIB. |
Meindl et al., 2021 [35] | MR | Prospective Observational | n = 85 patients with moderate to severe MR | VWFAct, VWFAg, and factor VIII expression before and 4 weeks after TMVR | - | 2017–2020 | VWFAct, VWFAct/vWFAg ratio, and VWFAg values did not change after TMVR. A significantly lower VWFAct/VWFAg ratio in primary MR versus secondary MR was observed both at baseline (p = 0.022) and 4 weeks following the TMVR procedure (p = 0.003). A mean mitral valve gradient ≥ 4 mmHg after TMVR had significantly lower VWFAct/VWFAg ratios as compared to patients with a mean mitral valve gradient. Alterations of the VWFAct/VWFAg ratio did not translate into a greater risk for bleeding events. | TMVR does not improve vWF levels or VWF activity 4 weeks after the procedure. Bleeding events in the short term after TMVR were rare despite a high perioperative risk, suggesting a superior safety profile of percutaneous MVR. |
Lane et al., 2019 [36] | MR | Retrospective Observational | n = 122 pre-TMVR patients with AF | CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED risk scores | - | 2014–2017 | The cohort demonstrated an average CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3.99. A total of 53 and 47% of TMVR patients were at high or intermediate risk of bleeding, respectively, according to their HAS-BLED score. | TMVR candidates demonstrate an intermediate to high risk of bleeding according to their HAS-BLED score. |
Tabrizi et al., 2023 [37] | MVR | Retrospective Observational | n = 442 MitraClip patients | Association between TEE procedure duration and TEE-related complications | - | 2015–2022 | TEE-related complications were observed in 17 patients (3.8%). Dysphagia was most common (n = 9/17, 53%), followed by new gastroesophageal reflux (n = 6/17, 35%) and odynophagia (n = 3/17, 18%). No esophageal perforations or upper gastrointestinal bleeds were appreciated. TEE procedure duration was not statistically different between the those with complication and those without. | TEE procedure duration time is not associated with GIB in patients undergoing MitraClip. |
Grasso et al., 2018 [38] | MR | Prospective Observational | n = 322 MitraClip patients | Rehospitalization rates and causes | - | - | Early rehospitalization rates (<30 days) occurred in 27% of cases. Cardiovascular (66%), anemia (6%), and GIB (6%) were the most frequent causes of 1-year rehospitalization. | Significant GIB can lead to hospitalization within one year of MitraClip procedure in a small percentage of patients. |
Khan et al., 2021 [39] | MR | Retrospective Cohort | n = 13,220 encounters from the National Inpatient Sample | Outcomes of TMVR | PH (n = 6610) vs. No PH (n = 6610; propensity-matched) | 2014–2018 | In-hospital mortality (3.6% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.01) and complications including blood transfusions (3.6% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.01), GIB (1.4% vs. 1%, p = 0.04), vascular complications (5.3% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.01), vasopressors use (2.9% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.01), and pacemaker placement (1.3% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.01) were significantly higher for encounters with PH. | Comorbid PH increases the risk of GIB in patients with MR undergoing TMVR. |
Fukunaga et al., 2018 [40] | MR | Retrospective Cohort | n = 66 patients (ages 50 to 69) status post-redo mitral valve replacement | Early and late survival, freedom from thromboembolic events, and valve-related complications | Mechanical valve (n = 44) vs. Biological valve (n = 22) | 1990–2015 | Mechanical redo mitral valve replacement was associated with improved 5- and 10-year survival rates and freedom from thromboembolic events at 5 and 10 years. GIB was only observed in one biological valve. | The rates of GIB with mechanical or biological valves appear similar, and both could be considered in high-bleed-risk patients. However, mechanical MVR has superior survival and freedom from thromboembolic event rates. |
Rokui et al., 2024 [41] | MVR | Retrospective, Multicenter, Propensity-Matched Cohort | n = 794 mitral valve replacement patients | 10-year survival, freedom from intervention, and postoperative complication rate | Mechanical valve (age < 65 years: n = 226; Age 65–75 years: n = 171) vs. Bioprostethic valve (age < 65 years: n = 226; Age 65–75 years: n = 171) | 2000–2017 | Ten-year survival (78.2% vs. 69.8%, p = 0.029) and ten-year freedom from reintervention (96.2% vs. 81.3%, p < 0.001) were superior with mechanical valves versus bioprosthetic valves in patients < 65 years. There were no differences between mechanical and bioprosthetic valves in 10-year survival (64.6% vs. 60.8%, p = 0.86) or 10-year freedom from reintervention (94.0% vs. 97.2%, p = 0.23) in patients between 65 and 75 years. Rates of postoperative stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, renal failure, and permanent pacemaker insertion were similar. | Mechanical and bioprosthetic mitral valve replacements demonstrate similar low rates of GIB at 10-year follow-up. |
Uchino et al., 2022 [42] | MVR | Retrospective Observational | n = 583 mechanical mitral valve replacement patients | Very-long-term outcomes | - | 1987–2015 | Survival rates at 10, 15, 20, and 25 years were 81.42%, 69.27%, 56.34%, and 45.03%, respectively. Thromboembolism was observed in 38 patients, intracranial hemorrhage in 26, and GIB in 9. Major paravalvular leaks were observed in 32 patients. The cumulative incidence rate of major paravalvular leaks at 10, 15, 20, and 25 years was 3.7%, 5.6%, 6.4% and 10.4%, respectively. | GIB is a rare very-long-term complication associated with mechanical mitral valve replacement. |
Belahnech et al., 2024 [43] | MR | Retrospective Cohort | n = 96 patients who underwent percutaneous mitral PVL closure | Recurrent GIB | Residual PVL (>mild) (n = 45) vs. No residual PVL (≤mild) (n = 51) | 2010–2022 | Recurrent GIB occurred in four patients with a history of GIB (4/11) and three without (3/85). All patients with recurrent GIB had residual PVL. Angiodysplasia was the most common cause of recurrent GIB (86%). | Residual PVL following MVR is associated with recurrent GIB, most commonly due to angiodysplasia. |
Author, Year | Valvular Disorder | Study Type | Number of Patients | Outcomes Measured | Groups | Study Period | Notable Outcomes | Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cai et al., 2020 [5] | TR | Retrospective | n = 124 patients with symptomatic severe TR | Reasons for hospitalization, cause and time of death, GIB, stroke, myocardial infarction, and new initiation of RRT. | TTVI + GDMT (n = 53) vs. GDMT (n = 71) | 2015–2019 | TTVI and GDMT improved TR symptoms and functional status and were associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality, AKI, and GIB, compared to GDMT alone. | Adjunct TTVI reduces the risk of GIB in patients with severe TR. |
Yang et al., 2024 [44] | TR | Retrospective | n = 1215 patients with moderate to severe TR and AF | Primary: Ischemic stroke, systemic embolic events, hospitalizations for major bleeding Secondary: Intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, all-cause mortality | NOAC (n = 724) vs. warfarin (n = 491) | 2010–2020 | NOACs demonstrated comparable efficacy for ischemic stroke, systemic embolic events, and major bleeding, including GIB. | NOACs are comparable to warfarin for GIB in patients with moderate to severe TR and AF. |
Author, Year | Valvular Disorder | Study Type | Number of Patients | Outcomes Measured | Groups | Study Period | Notable Outcomes | Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nakatsu et al., 2015 [45] | BHV | Retrospective Observational | n = 77 dialysis patients status post-BHV | Hemorrhage frequency and survival | - | 1991–2011 | The overall estimated Kaplan–Meier survival after 3, 5, and 7 years was 66.6 ± 5.6, 51.1 ± 6.3, and 34.4 ± 6.8%, respectively. Seventeen (22%) bleeding events were observed (5.9% per patient-year) in the follow-up period. Six of the nine patients with cerebral hemorrhages and two of the six with gastrointestinal hemorrhages died. There were no differences in the frequencies of hemorrhage between the patients treated with bioprostheses and mechanical valves. | GIB is a notable cause of hemorrhage and mortality in dialysis patients status post-BHV. |
Blackshear et al., 2016 [46] | AS/MR | Prospective Cohort | n = 136 patients with varying valvular disease | Severity of VWF dysfunction | Normally functioning surgical or transcatheter aortic valve (n = 26) vs. Dysfunctional aortic valve replacement (n = 24) vs. Normally functioning mitral valve replacement or repair (n = 36) vs. Dysfunctional mitral valve replacement or repair (n = 19) vs. Native AR without stenosis (n = 31) | 2010–2015 | Normal AVR showed higher VWFAct-to-VWFAg ratio compared to dysfunctional aortic valve replacement (p < 0.001), as did normal mitral valve replacement or repair compared to dysfunctional mitral valve replacement or repair (p = 0.005). GIB was noted in 25% of patients with aortic prosthesis dysfunction and 26% with mitral prosthesis/repair dysfunction and was associated with a lower normalized VWF multimer ratio than in patients without bleeding. Gastrointestinal angiodysplasia was noted in 83% of bleeding patients with dysfunctional aortic prostheses and in 60% of bleeding patients with dysfunctional mitral prostheses/repair. | Acquired abnormalities of VWF multimers are associated with aortic and mitral prosthesis dysfunction, with occasional GIB and gastrointestinal angiodysplasia. |
Briasoulis et al., 2018 [47] | Native VHD | Retrospective Cohort | n = 103,733 propensity-matched patients with new AF | All-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and MI | Nonvalvular AF (n = 85,596) - Dabigatran (n = 13,522) - Rivaroxaban (n = 14,257) - Warfarin (n = 57,817) Valvular AF (n = 18,137) - Dabigatran (n = 1979) - Rivaroxaban (n = 2027) - Warfarin (n = 14,131) | 2011–2013 | Both dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with significantly lower risk of death in patients with VHD with AF (dabigatran versus warfarin: HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.52–0.98; p = 0.038; rivaroxaban versus warfarin: HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.49–0.95; p = 0.022). Non-GIB was significantly reduced with dabigatran and rivaroxaban versus warfarin in those with VHD (dabigatran versus warfarin: HR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06–0.49; p = 0.001; rivaroxaban versus warfarin: HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.17–0.84; p = 0.017). Ischemic stroke and GIB rates did not differ between rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and warfarin in patients with VHD. The effects of the three anticoagulants on outcomes were comparable in patients with and without VHD and AF. | NOACs can safely be used in high-bleeding risk AF patients with or without VHD. |
Duan et al., 2021 [48] | BHV | Retrospective Cohort | n = 2672 AF patients with BHV | Ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, TIA, and adverse effects | NOAC (n = 439) vs. warfarin (n = 2233) | 2011–2020 | No significant difference in ischemic stroke, embolism, or TIA between NOACs and warfarin (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.96–1.48, p = 0.11). NOACs were associated with a lower risk of the intracranial hemorrhage, GIB, and other bleeds (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56–0.85, p < 0.001). | NOACs are non-inferior to warfarin in thromboembolic prevention in patients with AF and BHV but should be preferred given their more favorable adverse bleeding effect profile, especially in high-bleeding-risk patients. |
Suppah et al., 2023 [49] | BHV | Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis | n = 74,660 patients with BHV and AF from 28 studies (I2 = 0%, p < 0.10) | Primary: all-cause bleeding, major bleeding, stroke/systemic embolization, all-cause mortality Secondary: GIB, thromboembolic events, intracranial bleeding | NOACs (n = variable) vs. VKA (n = variable) | 2016–2022 | NOACs decrease the risk of all-cause bleeding (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.75–0.85, p > 0.00001), stroke and systemic embolization (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80–0.99, p = 0.03), and intracranial bleeding outcomes (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45–0.86, p = 0.004) compared with VKA. There was no significant difference in major bleeding (RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.84 1.02, p = 0.10) and all-cause mortality outcomes (RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.85–1.07, p = 0.43), respectively. No significant difference was observed in gastrointestinal bleeding. | NOACs are comparable to VKAs for GIB in patients with a BHV and AF. |
Liu et al., 2015 [50] | Valve Surgery | Retrospective Cohort | n = 1240 patients who received valve surgeries (MV replacement, mitral valvuloplasty, TVR, AVR, DVR, TVP) | Success and adverse effect rates | Age ≤ 60 (n = 603) (BHV, n = 17) vs. Age > 60 (n = 637) BHV, n = 80) | 2004–2014 | The age > 60 group had higher application rates of bioprosthetic valves, times of auxiliary ventilation, and hospitalization stay lengths (p < 0.05). No difference in low mortality rates (2.7% vs. 3.1%, p > 0.05) was appreciated. No difference in the incidence or mortality of upper GIB between groups (number of cases, 10/603 vs. 14/637; mortality, 10% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.456). | The age-related incidence and mortality of GIB in all patients undergoing valvuloplasty or valve replacement are similar. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gries, J.J.; Namjouyan, K.; Ul Hassan Virk, H.; Alam, M.; Jneid, H.; Krittanawong, C. Evaluating the Relationship Between Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Valvular Heart Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies. Gastrointest. Disord. 2024, 6, 916-946. https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord6040065
Gries JJ, Namjouyan K, Ul Hassan Virk H, Alam M, Jneid H, Krittanawong C. Evaluating the Relationship Between Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Valvular Heart Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies. Gastrointestinal Disorders. 2024; 6(4):916-946. https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord6040065
Chicago/Turabian StyleGries, Jacob J., Kamran Namjouyan, Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk, Mahboob Alam, Hani Jneid, and Chayakrit Krittanawong. 2024. "Evaluating the Relationship Between Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Valvular Heart Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies" Gastrointestinal Disorders 6, no. 4: 916-946. https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord6040065
APA StyleGries, J. J., Namjouyan, K., Ul Hassan Virk, H., Alam, M., Jneid, H., & Krittanawong, C. (2024). Evaluating the Relationship Between Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Valvular Heart Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies. Gastrointestinal Disorders, 6(4), 916-946. https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord6040065