3.2. Effect of pH
The major work in this study relies on the rapid-screening electrochemical method proposed to analyze both droplet and bulk volumes. The droplet-on-plate tests have shown considerable variations in pH within a droplet, underscoring the importance of understanding pH fluctuations within a droplet during the polarization test [
8]. As a result, a few drops of universal indicator were included in the electrolyte before carrying out the polarization test, which is a mixture of pH-sensitive dyes that changes color depending on the pH of the solution.
The series of images in
Figure 4 below illustrates changes in pH within a droplet at different polarization states. The color change near the plate may result from the production of hydroxide ions. It is observed that during cathodic polarization, greater alkalinity is shown at the plate connected to the working electrode, while the opposite trend is observed during anodic polarization. However, in the bulk volume, pH changes would be negligible. Therefore, an inhibitor that is effective at pH 7 in bulk volume may not be as effective in a droplet volume at the same pH due to the pH variation. The increase in pH at the electrodes could either cause passivation or accelerate corrosion, depending on the pH level and the nature of the substrate. Further investigation is required to understand the changes in inhibitor performance at different pH values.
Despite variations in environments, the difference in corrosion currents measured at each pH is only about 10–20%. This may be associated with reduced corrosion susceptibility and the presence of oxides, as the difference observed between the two scenarios was much more significant for steel.
A previously proposed rapid screening technique [
7] was employed to assess the impact of various inhibitors on galvanized steel.
Figure 5 demonstrates the effect of pH for an uninhibited droplet on a zinc surface. This was used as a baseline for evaluating the effect of pH on corrosion inhibitors.
The inhibitors were maintained at a uniform concentration of 10 mM, and the assessments were conducted at varying initial pH values, specifically pH 3, 7, and 10. These evaluations were performed using both bulk and droplet volumes, and the results are visually depicted in
Figure 6 below.
It is observed that most inhibitor solutions initialized at a pH of 3 follow a relatively linear trend, indicating comparable performance in both bulk and droplet volumes, with some more scattered points. It is noteworthy that most of the selected inhibitors demonstrate favorable performance within this pH range when contrasted with other initial pH values. Intriguingly, at pH 7, inhibitors display a distinctly scattered pattern, with a higher frequency of inhibitors exhibiting differentiated behavior. The results indicate that inhibitors exhibiting high efficacy in bulk environments tend to show only moderate performance in droplet conditions. As illustrated in
Figure 6, several inhibitors tested at pH 10 fall outside the plotted range due to negative inhibition efficiencies, effectively acting as corrosion accelerators. Among the remaining compounds, most cluster around approximately 50% inhibition efficiency in droplet exposures, while their performance in bulk solutions varies widely, including both positive and negative values. These observations suggest that alkaline conditions (pH 10) generally enhance corrosion protection within droplet environments compared to bulk systems.
The impact of pH is extensively studied in the corrosion industry due to its crucial role in the corrosion mechanism [
14,
15]. Thomas et al. [
16] conducted a study to explore the effects of pH in a droplet environment on zinc corrosion behavior. The study delved into the various corrosion processes influenced by different pH levels. In the pH range of 1 to 4, zinc corrosion is predominantly controlled by cathodic reactions, with the speed of corrosion determined by the kinetics of the hydrogen evolution reaction. As the pH levels range from 4 to 11, corrosion rates stabilize due to a shift in the cathodic process from hydrogen evolution to oxygen reduction. During this phase, the surface oxides on zinc are unable to effectively act as a corrosion barrier. In alkaline environments, the reaction of zinc with the surroundings leads to the formation of diverse oxides and complexes, which vary based on the local pH and potential.
The presence of pH gradient in a small, confined space can significantly impact the process of droplet corrosion [
8]. Understanding how these variations affect the effectiveness of corrosion inhibitors is crucial. Unlike the gradual pH changes that occur in larger volumes, the dynamic conditions within a droplet environment can lead to the formation of different oxide species at different locations. Electrochemical assessments of galvanized steel suggest that corrosion inhibition is increased in acidic droplets, likely due to the dissolution of oxide layers in highly acidic environments, promoting direct interactions between corrosion inhibitors and the metal surface. In the neutral pH condition, inhibitors exhibit different behavior in droplets compared to bulk volumes, with highly alkaline conditions supporting better performance. At pH 10, a passive zinc film forms according to the Pourbaix diagram, potentially serving as an effective anodic barrier. However, increased oxygen diffusion in droplets and a thin, porous precipitate layer can accelerate metal dissolution, leading to significant corrosion. Nevertheless, a thicker oxide layer forms over time, providing a more durable protective barrier [
16].
To examine these variations in greater detail,
Figure 7 illustrates the inhibition performance of a solution containing 10 mM 5-methyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-thiol (MMTD) across different pH conditions in both bulk and droplet configurations. The plot provides a comparative assessment of inhibition efficiencies, with polarization measurements conducted following a 10 min OCP stabilization period.
At pH 3, the inhibitor in both electrolyte conditions exhibits poor inhibition and accelerated corrosion. Conversely, under neutral conditions, the corrosion inhibitor demonstrates superior performance within droplets, while the alkaline droplet results in comparatively diminished effectiveness. Notably, at pH 10, corrosion currents measured for both inhibited and uninhibited conditions are notably lower than those observed at pH 3 and 7, potentially attributed to oxide formation. The pKa of 5-methyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-thiol is 6.49, implying that at a pH below this value, protonation of the molecule happens, which may lead to a decrease in its corrosion inhibition efficiency [
17]. At a higher pH value, deprotonation occurs, leading to the formation of electron lone pairs, which improves the chemical reactivity of the inhibitor molecule for better surface bonding and ensures higher inhibition efficiency. The comparison in
Figure 7 also illustrates significant differences in corrosion inhibition between bulk and droplet volumes, mainly when steel is used as the substrate. This underscores the potential variations in corrosion inhibitor performance in droplet corrosion scenarios. It is worth noting that the inhibitor 5-methyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-thiol is known for its effectiveness in bulk volumes. The data in this study were collected after a 10 min interval, which may account for the observed poor inhibition efficiency at neutral pH. This could be due to the film-forming nature of the corrosion inhibitor, which might require a longer time to exhibit its optimal effectiveness.
3.3. Simulation of Droplet Conditions in Full-Immersion Testing
In this study, the same corrosion inhibitor concentration is applied across bulk volume and droplet volume corrosion tests. For droplet tests, a volume of 800 μL is used, whilst for bulk volume tests, a volume of 80 mL is used (Scenario 01). The experimental approach involves the employment of electrolyte volumes that are significantly reduced, specifically to a factor 100 times lower than that of the conventional bulk volume; however, exposed metal surface is identical for both experimental conditions. This methodology focuses on the corrosion inhibition process where the number of molecules available for interaction within the droplet is significantly lower than that in the bulk volume. As a result, the limited availability of corrosion inhibitors leads to a decrease in their effectiveness over time due to their constrained presence within the droplet. Therefore, to understand whether the total amount of inhibitor molecules impacts the inhibition efficiency, a series of experiments were conducted by controlling this variable for both scenarios. The chemical details of the inhibitor used is summarized in
Table 2.
Accordingly, a 0.1 mM inhibitor concentration was used for full immersion testing, while a 10 mM inhibitor concentration was maintained for droplet corrosion tests (Scenario 02). The NaCl concentration for both scenarios was fixed at 0.1 M. Data from droplet volume testing is represented with dotted lines, and the equivalent bulk volume data is shown in solid lines, using consistent colors for clarity.
Despite the number of moles, droplet corrosion consistently exhibits higher corrosion current across all three tested corrosion inhibitors. This unintuitive observation indicates that a comparable number of moles in this study does not necessarily result in better performance and implies a different working mechanism for corrosion inhibitors in droplet and complete immersion testing. It should be noted that, over longer experimental times, inhibitor molecules diffuse through the bulk solution to reach the metal surface, whereas in the droplet environment, these molecules are in close proximity to the metal substrate. Noted is also that, as discussed above, oxygen availability plays a significant role in corrosion and inhibition. Notably, 2-mercapto-6-nitrobenzothiazole (MNBT) demonstrates a distinct inhibiting effect with reduced corrosion current after approximately 60 min of exposure under a droplet condition (
Figure 8), implying the formation of an effective protective film. In contrast, the corrosion current in bulk solutions tends to increase over time, indicating a lack of inhibition efficacy throughout the test duration. Furthermore, even when maintaining consistent inhibitor concentration and molarity in droplet and bulk volumes, these effects are not solely attributable to molarity for this inhibitor candidate. It is also observed that, in the case of zinc, droplet tests lead to a higher corrosion current for all three corrosion inhibitors at the onset. However, at varying exposure times from 25 to 40 min, the corrosion rate in the bulk volume progressively exceeds that in the droplet tests. This could be related to the oxide formation occurring more rapidly under droplet conditions compared to full immersion testing, likely due to high oxygen availability.
Nevertheless, the decrease in corrosion current over time is revealed once the inhibitor molecules interact with the metal surface in droplet environments, presumably attributed to a more stable protective film. In contrast, the full-immersion tests demonstrate that molecules such as 2-ABT and MNBT exhibit a reduced corrosion current compared to the uninhibited scenario; however, this current remains markedly higher than that observed under droplet conditions. This distinct behavior may be explained by the considerably lower number of moles in the bulk volume, which results in a slower diffusion rate of corrosion inhibitor molecules over time during the dynamic film growth at the interface, thereby affecting time-dependent corrosion protection.
These experimental observations, shown in
Figure 8, demonstrate a reduced effectiveness of corrosion inhibitors under droplet conditions compared to bulk immersion for steel. However, the efficiency of corrosion inhibitors in bulk volume is significantly lower than that observed for droplet volume. This suggests an alternative mechanism of inhibition in relation to steel substrates. However, with zinc, it appears that after a certain time period, the corrosion current measured in bulk volume surpasses that in droplet volume for the uninhibited and inhibited environments. This may suggest that corrosion under a droplet is optimal at early stages due to an abundance of dissolved oxygen. However, the transition time of oxygen to the surface, once the initial oxygen is depleted, may be slow, and the formation of an oxide layer is significantly impeded over time in bulk volumes. Unlike steel, for zinc, corrosion inhibitors seem to perform better in droplet volume than in bulk volume, which may indicate the slow diffusion of corrosion inhibitors to the metal surface.
3.4. Effect of Droplet Size
Based on our assumption that the corrosion mechanism differs significantly under a droplet compared to bulk conditions, primarily due to the shortened path for oxygen to reach the metal–electrolyte interface, variations in droplet size could influence corrosion rates [
11,
18,
19]. To explore this concept further, a series of experiments was conducted, comparing the effects of different droplet sizes in the presence and absence of corrosion inhibitors. The same polarization test sequence outlined previously was repeated with different droplet sizes. A series of droplet sizes ranging from 200 µL to 800 µL were monitored. It was observed that over a period of 1 h, at a room temperature of 22 ± 1 °C and a relative humidity level of 55 ± 5%, the active area of the substrate remained entirely covered by the droplet. Molecular structures of the studied inhibitors were shown in
Table 3.
The plot in
Figure 9 illustrates the results of these experiments. The observed variation in droplet thickness and shape across different droplet sizes can be attributed to the interplay between surface tension and gravitational forces. Smaller droplets, such as the 200 μL droplet, exhibit a more spherical shape and a smaller height due to the dominance of surface tension, which minimizes the surface area [
20,
21,
22,
23,
24]. Larger droplets tend to flatten and spread, as seen with the 800 μL droplet, resulting in a larger diameter and a more cylindrical profile [
20,
25]. This is also accompanied by an increase in the contact angle, reflecting the changing balance between adhesive forces at the liquid–solid interface and cohesive forces within the liquid. As anticipated, in the case of droplets containing only NaCl, the smallest droplet size of 200 μL resulted in the highest corrosion current. Overall, this corrosion current gradually diminishes with increasing droplet size. A study conducted by E. Rahimi et al. [
12] revealed that under a thick electrolyte (5 μL droplet), a two-dimensional or spherical diffusion can be considered for ORR, whereas when the droplet size is reduced to 1.5 μL, the oxygen diffusion is in a perpendicular direction to the electrode surface; i.e., planar diffusion [
12]. Therefore, smaller droplets exhibit a lower concentration gradient with one-dimensional diffusion. In this setup, as the droplet diameter is constant, the smaller droplets appear to have a higher concentration gradient than the larger droplets, as indicated below in
Figure 10.
The data illustrates a clear pattern of exponentially increasing current density with longer exposure times at a consistently applied potential of +/−75 mV in relation to OCP. Interestingly, smaller droplet sizes of 200 µL and 400 µL exhibit higher current density when compared to larger droplets in the case of uninhibited droplets.
When considering variations between repeats, the data shows that smaller droplets, such as 200 µL and 400 µL, exhibit a significantly higher variation, whereas larger droplets show minimal variation. This difference can be attributed to factors such as secondary spreading, corrosion product deposition, and evaporation, which increase as the droplet size decreases [
10,
26]. It is important to note that the active area of the metal remains constant for each droplet size, indicating that the corrosion products formed would be similar. However, the deposition of corrosion products per unit volume decreases for larger droplet sizes, potentially impacting the variability of the current data [
27]. In addition, the impact of evaporation over time on smaller droplets could be more significant compared to larger droplets [
12,
23,
28].
As shown in
Figure 11, a notable observation arises upon introducing the corrosion inhibitor: the largest droplet size measured at 800 μL exhibits an increased corrosion current, deviating from the anticipated pattern. Moreover, with regard to molecules MMTD and AMBT, a droplet size of 600 μL manifests heightened corrosion current. This indicates that a droplet size of 600 μL demonstrates relatively superior efficacy in inhibiting corrosion compared to that of an 800 μL droplet and also surpasses the performance seen at droplet sizes of 200 μL and 400 μL. Such anomalies may be associated with a more pronounced influence of factors such as evaporation rates, the formation of corrosion products, or the concentration of dissolved oxygen within the solution.
The theoretical framework suggests that smaller droplet configurations should induce higher corrosion currents, which are expected to decrease with increasing droplet size due to longer oxygen diffusion paths and reduced mass transport to the metal surface. Conversely, when sufficiently small droplets are distributed across the entire metal surface, they coalesce to form a thin electrolyte film rather than discrete droplets, resulting in a distinct corrosion regime that differs from that of isolated droplets [
23]. This deviation indicates that the classical Evans droplet model may have limited applicability under these conditions, since a near-uniform electrolyte thickness across the droplet minimizes the formation of oxygen concentration gradients central to the theory. In support of this interpretation, the experimental data demonstrate that larger droplets, especially 600 μL droplets, often produce higher corrosion currents, suggesting that the geometric characteristics of larger droplets can promote more sustained corrosion activity.
To accommodate the experimental investigation of smaller droplets and aerosol sizes in the range of 2–10 µL, modifications in the electrochemical cell setup are proposed, including the reduction in the exposed metal surface area. This adaptation, coupled with conducting experiments within a humidity chamber equipped to regulate humidity and temperature, aims to mitigate evaporative effects during the experimental period. Previous studies have demonstrated the effects of inclusions and grain boundaries on the metal surface for smaller droplets compared to larger droplets [
18,
19]. If droplet or aerosol size is smaller than the grain size, the corrosion rate is significantly reduced. However, this theory is not applicable here with reducing droplet sizes as the metal-exposed area remains constant, while the droplet’s height and contact angle change [
11,
12].
Based on our testing method, a droplet volume spectrum spanning from 100 μL to 800 μL has been selected to ensure comprehensive coverage of the metal surface area, thereby minimizing the potential impact of evaporation phenomena on the experiment. Although the aerosol formation over the metal surface due to condensation is much smaller than that used in this test method, these droplet sizes could still represent atmospheric corrosion under rain droplets, which are known to be approximately 2 mm in diameter.
A droplet-based model was previously developed to characterize potential distribution, anodic and cathodic sites, and the spatial variation of ion and oxygen concentrations within the electrolyte and at the metal interface as a function of droplet size [
29]. The oxygen concentration inside the droplet can be expressed in terms of the dimensionless ratio
, where k denotes the cathodic reaction rate constant, R represents the droplet radius, and D is the diffusion coefficient of dissolved oxygen. The porosity of zinc oxide is approximately 0.276.
At a droplet size of 3–5 mm, the
value falls between the theoretical curves of
= 0.1 and
= 1.0. When
= 1, the Evans effect becomes dominant, whereas its influence is negligible at values below 0.1. This positioning indicates a moderate contribution of Evans droplet theory for a droplet radius of approximately 5 mm [
29].
As droplet size increases, the gradient in oxygen concentration within the electrolyte becomes more pronounced. In the presence of efficient corrosion inhibitors, the cathodic reaction rate is expected to decrease, which reduces the value of k and consequently lowers the ratio. This reduction suggests that the significance of the Evans effect diminishes when effective inhibitors are present.
Furthermore, it is pivotal that smaller droplets inherently contain fewer corrosion inhibitor molecules, thereby compromising the formation and stability of a protective film to inhibit corrosion efficaciously. In addition, it warrants consideration that larger droplets, by virtue their size, contain a higher content of dissolved oxygen relative to smaller droplets for an equivalent active area. This abundance of dissolved oxygen is believed to accelerate the corrosion process. Moreover, the phenomenon of evaporation leads to a significant increase in the concentration of corrosion inhibitors and saline solution, potentially exerting a greater influence on the corrosion rate than the presence of dissolved oxygen [
4,
28].
The research conducted in this study has extensively investigated various factors that influence atmospheric corrosion and how these factors impact the effectiveness of corrosion inhibitors in droplet volume when compared to bulk volume. Factors such as the presence of dissolved oxygen, pH levels, number of moles, duration of exposure, evaporation, and droplet size have been shown to significantly influence corrosion within droplet volumes, while their impact on bulk volume corrosion is less pronounced. Any alterations occurring within a droplet substantially impact the corrosion process due to the confined volume and specific environmental conditions. This research marks a significant step forward in understanding the operational mechanisms of corrosion inhibitors within droplets and highlights the distinctions between conventional immersion tests and bulk volume corrosion. It is crucial to address atmospheric corrosion precisely and identify suitable corrosion inhibitors specifically tailored for corrosion within droplets. This approach could ensure that protective coatings perform as expected, leading to more sustainable and cost-effective solutions.