Previous Article in Journal
Pre-Corroded ER Sensors as Realistic Mock-Ups for Evaluating Conservation Strategies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aging Investigation of Polyethylene-Coated Underground Steel Pipelines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Natural Orange Peel Extract as a Corrosion Inhibitor and Cleaning Agent for Surgical Instruments

by
Willian Aperador
1,*,
Giovany Orozco-Hernández
2 and
Jonnathan Aperador
3
1
Department of Engineering, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Bogotá 110111, Colombia
2
Postgraduate Department, Universidad ECCI, Bogotá 111311, Colombia
3
Department of Engineering, Universidad de Boyacá, Tunja 150001, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Corros. Mater. Degrad. 2025, 6(4), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/cmd6040067
Submission received: 22 September 2025 / Revised: 11 December 2025 / Accepted: 15 December 2025 / Published: 17 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Material Surface Corrosion and Protection)

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy of an environmentally friendly degreasing agent formulated from orange peel extract as both a cleaning agent and corrosion inhibitor for surgical instruments manufactured from 316LVM stainless steel. The extract was obtained via microwave-assisted hydrodistillation and subsequently blended with biodegradable surfactants. Its performance was compared against a benchmark commercial cleaner (West Oxyclean®) through Tafel polarization, Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD). FTIR analysis confirmed the presence of terpenic compounds, predominantly limonene, alongside ethers, alcohols, and unsaturated structure characteristics of citrus essential oils. Polarization and EIS results showed that the formulation containing 0.12% extract exhibited the highest charge-transfer resistance and the lowest corrosion current density (0.093 μA/cm2), achieving an inhibition efficiency of 81.29%, whereas the 0.08% formulation showed greater corrosive response than the commercial cleaner. SEM imaging demonstrated a progressive decline in both the severity and density of localized corrosion attacks with increasing extract concentration, while XRD diffractograms indicated a marked reduction in corrosion-product formation—completely absent at the optimal concentration. These findings demonstrate that orange peel extract functions as an effective and environmentally sustainable corrosion inhibitor, capable of preserving the structural and surface integrity of surgical-grade steel. Its technical performance, combined with its biodegradable profile, positions it as a promising alternative to conventional industrial cleaners within medical and hospital applications.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, the shift towards sustainable solutions has gained particular significance in the hospital sector [1,2], where cleaning protocols for surgical instruments especially those manufactured from 316LVM stainless steel face a critical dilemma: balancing disinfectant efficacy with environmental safety and material preservation [3,4].
Although industrial degreasers based on synthetic surfactants (such as nonylphenol ethoxylate) have been widely employed, their environmental persistence and endocrine-disrupting effects have placed them under the scrutiny of international regulations [5,6]. Simultaneously, the agro-industrial sector generates millions of tons of organic waste annually, notably Citrus sinensis peels, which are rich in D limonene a monoterpene with solvent [7,8], antimicrobial, and, as recently discovered, metallic corrosion inhibiting properties [9,10].
Corrosion of medical instruments made from 316LVM stainless steel an alloy prized for its biocompatibility and mechanical resilience poses a latent risk in clinical settings, where degradation mechanisms differ significantly from those in industrial contexts [11,12]. Although not exposed to high concentrations of aggressive agents such as CO2 or H2S, the steel may be attacked by chlorides from saline solutions, disinfectants, or cleaning residues, producing microscopic pitting and microfractures that compromise critical joints [13,14]. Moreover, mechanical stresses in conjunction with corrosive environments promote phenomena such as stress corrosion cracking and galvanic corrosion, particularly in the presence of dissimilar alloys [15]. The resulting by products chromium oxides, iron sulfides, and nickel hydroxides may impair both the biocompatibility and functionality of medical devices. Analytical tools such as SEM/EDS, XPS, and potentiodynamic polarization testing enable the characterization and quantification of such damage. Clinically, this may manifest as toxic ion release, reduced surgical precision, and, in extreme cases, catastrophic structural failure [16].
In response to this challenge, a solution is proposed that simultaneously addresses cleaning performance and material compatibility: the development of a bio-degreaser for surgical instruments, obtained through microwave assisted hydrodistillation of orange peels [17]. The active agent, D limonene, was selected for its natural origin, low toxicity, and documented corrosion inhibiting efficacy on carbon steels with efficiencies exceeding 90% [18]. However, its application to surgical grade stainless steels such as 316LVM remains underexplored, presenting a valuable opportunity for innovation in clinical environments.
Additionally, the selection of 316LVM stainless steel as the study substrate is justified by its widespread use in implants and high precision medical devices, where corrosion resistance, mechanical stability, and biocompatibility are essential. This steel is subjected to demanding operational conditions, including exposure to saline solutions, sterilization cycles, and continuous mechanical stress all of which may compromise its integrity if incompatible cleaning agents are employed [19]. Evaluating the compatibility of D limonene with this material is therefore vital to ensure its safety and efficacy as a bio-degreaser for surgical applications [20].
This study posits that Citrus sinensis extract functions not only as an efficient cleaning agent but also as a corrosion inhibitor for surgical stainless steel, through the formation of a protective film via physical adsorption of its active compounds. A biodegradable formulation enriched with ecofriendly surfactants is assessed for its comparative performance against a commercial reference product, using analytical techniques such as Tafel polarization, FTIR spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-Ray diffraction (XRD). The overarching objective is to contribute to the advancement of hospital cleaning strategies that are safe, effective, and environmentally sustainable.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Acquisition of Citric Extract

Orange peels (Citrus sinensis), sourced from fresh agro-industrial waste, were visually inspected to exclude specimens exhibiting physical damage, signs of microbiological deterioration, or fungal contamination. The selected peels were subsequently rinsed with potable running water and subjected to natural drying for five days at 25 °C, under forced ventilation and shielded from direct sunlight to preserve volatile compounds and prevent thermal oxidation.
Once dehydrated, the peels were mechanically fragmented into approximately 2 cm2 pieces using a low-speed domestic blender (Oster®, model BLSTMG-WR0, Boca Raton, FL, USA), thereby optimizing the specific surface area for extraction. The essential oil was extracted via microwave-assisted hydrodistillation (MAHD) employing a modified domestic microwave oven (LG Electronics, model MS2042DB, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 900 W) coupled with a Clevenger-type collection apparatus (Borosil®, Mumbai, India). Each trial utilized 100 g of peel and 300 mL of distilled water, subjected to intermittent irradiation cycles (5 min on/1 min off) at 600 W for a total duration of 60 min, in order to prevent overheating and maintain the structural integrity of the monoterpenes.
The oily extract was separated by decantation, dehydrated using anhydrous sodium sulfate (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA), and stored in airtight amber glass bottles at 4 °C. The extract concentration was determined via controlled evaporation and gravimetric analysis of the residual solids.

2.2. Formulation of the Ecofriendly Degreaser

The ecofriendly degreaser was formulated from a stable emulsion composed of Citrus sinensis essential oil and biodegradable non-ionic surfactants, selected for their compatibility with surgical materials. The base formulation contained 5% v/v cocamidopropyl betaine, 5% v/v decyl glucoside, and 10% v/v citrus extract. Emulsification was performed under magnetic stirring at 600 rpm for 30 min at ambient temperature. This stock formulation was subsequently diluted using distilled water to obtain the final working concentrations of 0.05%, 0.08% and 0.12% v/v.
The pH of the mixture was adjusted to 6.5 ± 0.2 using citric acid (0.01 M) and sodium hydroxide (0.1 M), enhancing both colloidal stability and chemical compatibility with 316LVM stainless steel. The emulsion was stored at 25 °C for 30 days and assessed visually to confirm its stability, with no flocculation or phase separation observed.
From the base emulsion, three experimental dilutions were prepared with citrus extract concentrations of 0.05%, 0.08% and 0.12% v/v. These formulations were employed in tests assessing greasy contaminant removal and corrosion inhibition. The selected dilutions enabled the development of a comparative efficacy curve, facilitating an analysis of the extract behaviors as a function of concentration. All results were benchmarked against those obtained using a widely utilized commercial clinical degreaser (West Oxyclean®, West Oxy S.A.S., Bogotá, Colombia).

2.3. Preparation of Metallic Samples

Reused samples of 316LVM stainless steel were employed, sourced from surgical instruments, owing to their composition and mechanical-biological compatibility, which render them suitable for clinical environments. For their reconditioning, solutions of the eco-friendly degreaser formulated with citrus extract were applied at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.08%, and 0.12%, with the aim of eliminating greasy residues without compromising the integrity of the material’s surface.
These concentrations were selected considering preliminary corrosion-inhibition assessments and visible effectiveness in organic residue removal.
To determine the cleaning efficiency, mass loss measurements were performed before and after washing, complemented with surface inspection via SEM to verify residue removal. The same cleaning protocol was applied when using West Oxyclean®, ensuring comparable exposure time (15 min), temperature (25 °C), rinsing availability and drying conditions.
Additionally, the commercial product West Oxyclean® was used as a comparative reference. Following each treatment, the specimens were rinsed with distilled water, then with absolute ethanol, and subsequently dried at ambient laboratory conditions.
No abrasive polishing or mechanical finishing was performed, in order to preserve the real conditions encountered in surgical re-use cycles.

2.4. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

FTIR analysis was employed to characterize the functional groups present in the citrus extract. Measurements were conducted using a Nicolet iS10 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), with 40 scans per spectrum over a spectral range from 4000 to 500 cm−1, under standard laboratory conditions. Samples were preconditioned for 24 h to ensure uniform moisture distribution.

2.5. Electrochemical

Potentiostatic polarization tests were performed in a three-electrode cell, wherein 316LVM stainless steel served as the working electrode (WE), a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) functioned as the reference electrode, and a platinum electrode was utilized as the counter electrode. The system was connected to a Reference 3000™ potentiostat (Gamry Instruments, Warminster, PA, USA), and data acquisition was carried out using Gamry Echem Analyst software (version 7.10, Gamry Instruments, Warminster, PA, USA).
Open circuit potential (OCP) was monitored for 150 min prior to each measurement to ensure stabilization of the OCP under steady-state conditions, allowing the system to reach a stable electrochemical response. Subsequently, electrochemical polarization curves were obtained by scanning the potential between −500 mV and +200 mV relative to OCP, at a scan rate of 0.1667 mV/s. From the resulting curves, the following parameters were determined: corrosion potential (Ecorr), corrosion current density (Icorr), corrosion rate, and inhibition efficiency (IE%), calculated as:
I E   % = ( 1 I c o r r I c o r r 316 L )
where Icorr316L and Icorr represent the corrosion current densities in the absence and presence of the inhibitor, respectively.
The current density in the presence of the extract was obtained through polarization curve analysis. Tafel analysis was conducted manually by identifying the linear regions of both the anodic and cathodic branches to ensure accurate extrapolation of the electrochemical parameters.
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were carried out to complement the polarization results and assess the interfacial corrosion behavior of 316LVM stainless steel in solutions containing orange peel extract at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.08%, and 0.12%, as well as in the commercial cleaner West Oxyclean®. The same three-electrode configuration used for the polarization tests was employed, with 316LVM stainless steel as the working electrode (1.0 cm2 exposed area), a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as the reference electrode, and a platinum mesh as the counter electrode.
Prior to impedance measurements, the specimens were allowed to stabilize at open-circuit potential (OCP) for 150 min to ensure electrochemical equilibrium. Nyquist spectra were then acquired over a frequency range of 100 kHz to 10 mHz using a 10 mV rms sinusoidal perturbation applied at OCP. All measurements were performed with a Reference 3000™ potentiostat (Gamry Instruments), and data were processed using Gamry Echem Analyst® software.

2.6. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Following the electrochemical assays, morphological analysis of the metallic surfaces was conducted using scanning electron microscopy. Prior to examination, the samples had been exposed to solutions containing citrus extract at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.08%, and 0.12% v/v, as well as to control solutions without the extract, for the duration of the electrochemical tests. Upon completion, the surfaces were rinsed with distilled water and air dried at ambient temperature.
SEM analysis was carried out using a JCM-7000 benchtop scanning electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), aimed at assessing the visual effects of corrosion, the integrity of the passive layer, and the presence of oxidation products. This morphological characterization enabled correlation with the electrochemical parameters previously obtained.

2.7. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

Following the SEM based morphological assessment, structural characterization of the metallic surfaces was performed via X-ray diffraction, with the objective of identifying crystalline phases and potential corrosion products. A Malvern Panalytical Empyrean diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK) was used, equipped with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). The analytical conditions comprised an angular scan range from 20° to 90° (2θ), with a step size of 0.02° and a counting time sufficient to ensure peak resolution. This setup provided detailed insights into the phases present on the surface after exposure to the various inhibited media.

3. Results

3.1. FTIR Analysis

Figure 1 presents the FTIR spectra obtained from citrus extracts at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.08%, and 0.12% v/v, revealed a series of characteristic absorption bands that qualitatively identify functional groups present in essential oils derived from orange peel. Across all concentrations, the spectral profiles were consistent, with the primary differences observed in band intensities, reflecting variation in the relative abundance of active compounds.
Prominent absorption bands were detected at 2918 and 2853 cm−1, indicative of aliphatic C–H stretching, along with peaks at 1460 and 1378 cm−1 related to aromatic C–H bending and methyl group vibrations. These spectral features are well documented as characteristic of terpenic compounds, especially limonene, the dominant constituent of citrus essential oils, as reported by Hachlafi et al. and Bhattacharyya et al. [21,22].
Further analysis identified lower intensity bands at 1304 and 1154 cm−1, associated with C–O and C–O–C stretching vibrations, potentially attributable to alcohols, ethers, or esters present in minor quantities. Additionally, signals at 886 and 722 cm−1 were observed, corresponding to out of plane =C–H bending vibrations, suggesting the presence of alkene type double bonds consistent with the unsaturated nature of limonene and other monoterpenes. These bands fall within the spectral range reported in standard FTIR libraries and are reinforced by computational and experimental analyses such as those in İşcan (2024) [23], confirming the spectral assignments. Furthermore, comparison with FTIR spectral libraries revealed high concordance, confirming the limonene-rich composition of the extracts.
Beyond qualitative characterization, the relative band intensity was notably influenced by extract concentration, with more concentrated samples displaying greater absorption and correspondingly lower transmittance, as expected from an elevated presence of absorbent functional compounds. This trend was especially evident in the 1200–900 cm−1 region, where spectra exhibited a more complex absorption pattern likely due to overlapping C–O, C–C and =C–H vibrations resulting in reduced resolution yet simultaneously highlighting the extract’s structural complexity. Notably, this spectral domain has been identified as highly predictive in multivariate analyses for citrus oil authentication via partial least squares regression (PLSR), for citrus oil authentication. This was confirmed by studies such as Yu et al. [24], where PLSR was employed to analyze orange quality, indicating the utility of spectral regions rich in C–O and unsaturated bonds. These insights emphasize the analytical relevance of this spectral domain beyond basic inspection.
FTIR findings confirm that orange peel extracts contain not only limonene as a principal component but also a diverse mixture of alcohols, ethers, and carbonyl-containing compounds. This chemical complexity has important implications for their performance as natural degreasing agents and their corrosion inhibition efficacy on metallic surfaces such as 316LVM stainless steel. The spectral similarity to commercial citrus oils and reference materials reported in the literature further supports the idea that such extracts possess a consistent and identifiable chemical signature, suitable for authentication and quality control protocols. As demonstrated in recent studies (Kamil et al.; Septianissa and Chandrasari) [25,26], FTIR proves to be a rapid, reproducible, and non destructive technique ideally suited for evaluating such complex bio-based inhibitors.

3.2. Electrochemical Characterization

3.2.1. Polarization Curves

The polarization curve of 316LVM stainless steel exposed to the West Oxyclean® product exhibited an electrochemical profile characteristic of materials that form stable passive layers, a behavior typically observed in physiological or clinical environments (Figure 2). Under the naturally aerated conditions used in the experiment, dissolved oxygen acted as the main depolarizer of the corrosion process, governing the cathodic reaction through oxygen reduction and contributing to the observed passive behavior. The passive region, extending from the corrosion potential (Ecorr) to the pitting potential (Ep), indicates an overall passive response towards the test solution. However, the morphology of the observed hysteresis loop suggests signs of localized corrosion, particularly around an Ep value of −0.040 V vs. SCE, which may indicate a breakdown of the passive film. Similar electrochemical responses have been reported in the literature, where 316L stainless steel exhibited degradation of passivity and initiation of pitting under biofilm or aggressive ion influence, as shown by Pratikno & Titah. and Zhao et al., highlighting the critical role of surface chemistry and alloying elements in corrosion resistance [27,28].
Upon scanning towards more positive potentials, a pitting region is encountered, characterized by a significant increase in current while the potential remains relatively stable. This phenomenon is critical for evaluating the susceptibility of the material to localized corrosion. The moderate difference between Ecorr and Ep indicates a limited capacity of the steel to resist the onset of pitting, especially in the presence of oxidizing species such as the peroxides found in West Oxyclean®.
Subsequently, the applied potential sweep during the polarization test likely exacerbated these effects by generating potential gradients that promoted the propagation of incipient pits. Moreover, the use of a slow scan rate enabled a more accurate resolution of localized dissolution events. Overall, the combined effect of prolonged exposure to a chemically aggressive medium and the controlled polarization process created favorable conditions for the localized breakdown of the passive film and the initiation of pitting corrosion in 316LVM stainless steel [29].
Figure 2 displays the potentiodynamic polarization curves obtained for 316LVM stainless steel exposed to varying concentrations of a citrus-based degreaser (0.05%, 0.08%, and 0.12% v/v). All measurements were performed within the same potential range as previous tests conducted on AISI 316 stainless steel, allowing for direct comparison of electrochemical behavior. The observed curves show characteristics of a passive region, but variations in pitting potential and current density reflect the influence of the extract’s organic compounds on corrosion resistance. These findings are in line with similar studies that analyzed the electrochemical behavior of stainless steels in the presence of natural plant-derived inhibitors, such as Deyab & Mohsen [31], where avocado extract significantly altered the corrosion parameters. Likewise, coatings and passive layers formed under complex organic media, as explored by Cheng et al. [32], demonstrated notable shifts in electrochemical profiles, reinforcing the applicability of biogenic solutions in metal surface protection.
It was observed that increasing the inhibitor concentration shifts the corrosion potential (Ecorr) toward more positive values and significantly reduces the corrosion current density (Icorr, inh). This shift indicates an enhancement in the system’s protective capability against general corrosion. Notably, the 0.12% formulation exhibited the lowest Icorr, inh, suggesting greater surface coverage by the inhibitor and superior protection efficiency.
In contrast, the 0.05% formulation resulted in a shift in Ecorr toward more negative values, accompanied by higher anodic current density. This behavior reflects lower inhibitory effectiveness, even exceeding the response observed in the uninhibited condition (Icorr), implying limited interaction between the inhibitor molecules and the metallic surface at this concentration.
The analysis also shows that none of the polarization curves exhibited an abrupt increase in current at more positive potentials, indicating the absence of a well-defined pitting region. All formulations produced a clearly established passive zone, with relatively stable current densities throughout the passive interval. This behavior is characteristic of efficiently inhibited systems and contrasts with commercial formulations such as West Oxyclean®, for which pitting initiation has been reported under similar conditions.
Collectively, the results demonstrate that the citrus-based formulations tested act as effective corrosion inhibitors for the stainless steel alloy under evaluation. The optimal concentration was 0.12%, as it provided the highest degree of protection, maintaining the alloy in a continuously passive state and significantly reducing the corrosion rate.
From a mechanistic perspective, the observed protective effect may be attributed to the formation of a thin organic film adhering to the metal surface, possibly enriched with terpenic compounds such as limonene. This layer likely functions as a physical barrier, hindering electron transfer and the ingress of chloride ions. Such behavior is supported by studies such as Alontseva et al. [33], which document the influence of organic coatings and surface modifications on the electrochemical response of 316L stainless steel. Their findings reinforce the idea that adsorbed organic molecules—even at low concentrations—can alter passivity, influence the pitting potential, and affect the overall corrosion resistance of the alloy in complex environments.
It is important to note that the 0.05% concentration exhibited a negative inhibition efficiency (Ef%), which indicates a phenomenon of corrosion activation rather than protection. This behavior is attributed to the fact that such a low concentration does not provide a sufficient amount of organic compounds to form a continuous adsorbed film on the 316LVM stainless steel surface. The incomplete surface coverage generates exposed active sites and heterogeneous adsorption, promoting local destabilization of the passive layer and an increase in the anodic current density. This behavior is consistent with reports for citrus-based extracts at low concentrations, where insufficient and non-uniform surface coverage can induce activation instead of inhibition.

3.2.2. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)

To complement the polarization results and strengthen the electrochemical validation of the inhibitor, Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) was performed on 316L stainless steel exposed to different concentrations of the citrus extract, as well as to the commercial cleaner West Oxyclean®. The Nyquist plots obtained are shown in Figure 3.
All systems exhibited a single capacitive loop, indicating that corrosion is governed predominantly by charge-transfer processes rather than diffusion-controlled behavior. A progressive increase in the diameter of the semicircle was observed as inhibitor concentration increased, signifying higher charge-transfer resistance and thus enhanced corrosion protection. The formulation at 0.12% v/v displayed the largest semicircle, demonstrating the highest resistance to corrosion and the most effective surface protection.
Conversely, the solution containing 0.05% v/v produced the smallest semicircle, confirming it to be the least effective inhibiting concentration under the experimental conditions. This observation is fully consistent with the polarization data (Table 1), where 0.05% exhibited the highest Icorr value and the lowest protection efficiency (Ef%). Such behavior suggests limited surface coverage and reduced adsorption of the active organic species from the extract at this concentration.
The commercial cleaner West Oxyclean® also exhibited lower impedance values when compared to the 0.08% and 0.12% extract solutions, highlighting that the natural extract, at adequate concentration, provides superior protective performance.
The absence of Warburg-type diffusion features confirms an interfacial reaction mechanism, supporting the hypothesis that terpenes and flavonoids from the orange peel extract adsorb onto the metal surface forming a barrier layer that hinders electron transfer and restricts the ingress of aggressive ions.
In the Bode plot of Figure 4 corresponding to the impedance modulus (|Z|), it can be observed that at low frequencies particularly below 10−1 Hz the magnitude of |Z| increases markedly as the inhibitor concentration rises. This behavior is a direct indication of greater overall resistance of the system to the corrosion process, since low frequencies reflect long range phenomena associated with charge transfer processes and with the integrity of the protective film adsorbed on the metal surface. The solution containing 0.12% extract exhibited the highest impedance values, demonstrating the formation of a dense, stable and strongly adherent film capable of significantly reducing the corrosion rate. The 0.08% concentration showed an intermediate response, whereas the 0.05% extract displayed the most pronounced decline in |Z|, indicating that the film generated at this concentration is thinner, less homogeneous and less capable of hindering the migration of aggressive species. The commercial cleaner West Oxyclean® showed moderate performance, with impedance values lower than those obtained for 0.12% and 0.08%, confirming that the natural extract is able to generate a more efficient protective barrier when used at appropriate concentrations.
The analysis of the phase angle in the Bode plot provides even more revealing information regarding the nature and quality of the protective layers formed. The systems containing 0.12% and 0.08% extract exhibit higher phase angles and, notably, an extended phase region spanning a wide frequency range. This response is typically associated with strongly capacitive behavior, characteristic of compact, homogeneous films with a low defect density. The breadth of the phase plateau indicates that the capacity of the film to store electrical charge remains stable over several decades of frequency, suggesting that the inhibitive layer displays structural continuity and chemical uniformity both indicative of efficient adsorption of the organic compounds present in the extract. Conversely, the system with 0.05% inhibitor shows a narrower, less intense phase curve shifted towards higher frequencies, which indicates the formation of a more reactive film with greater surface heterogeneity and lower electrochemical stability. This loss of capacitive character explains the poorer protection recorded in the polarization tests and corresponds to its lower charge transfer resistance.
Another key aspect identified in the Bode diagrams is the shift in the phase-angle maximum towards lower frequencies as the inhibitor concentration increases. This phenomenon is interpreted as an increase in the system’s time constant (τ = Rct·Cdl), implying that the film formed at higher concentrations acts as a more effective medium for slowing the charge discharge processes associated with corrosion. A larger time constant correlates with slower electrochemical processes, producing a scenario in which electron transport and the diffusion of aggressive species are significantly hindered by the adsorbed layer. In the case of the 0.12% extract, this shift is particularly pronounced, reinforcing the interpretation that this concentration is the most effective in promoting a strongly adherent and degradation-resistant film.
The behavior of the West Oxyclean® cleaner in the Bode plots reinforces the preceding conclusions: although it exhibits a noticeable phase angle and a response suggestive of some protective capacity, both the phase intensity and the |Z| values are consistently lower than those obtained for the more effective plant-based formulations. This indicates that the commercial product generates a less robust or less stable protective film compared with the organic layer formed by the active compounds of the citrus extract. The relative inferiority of West Oxyclean® with respect to the 0.12% and 0.08% systems aligns fully with the trend observed in the polarization tests and in the Nyquist diagrams.
The impedance spectra presented in Figure 5 were modeled using a two time constant equivalent circuit that accounts for both the porous inhibitive film and the underlying corrosion processes. The model consists of the solution resistance (Rsoln) in series with two parallel R CPE elements. The first branch (Rpo in parallel with Cc,m) represents the porous inhibitor film, where Rpo describes the pore resistance and Cc is a constant phase element that captures the non ideal dielectric behavior of the coating. The second branch (Rcor in parallel with Ccor,n) corresponds to the corrosion interface, with Rcor representing the charge-transfer resistance and Ccor modeling the non-ideal capacitive contribution of the electrochemical double layer. This circuit was selected because the Bode plots exhibited two distinct relaxation processes, indicating that both the surface film and the corrosion reaction significantly influence the overall impedance response. A single-time-constant Randles circuit was therefore insufficient to accurately describe the system. The dual R–CPE structure enables separation of film-related processes (Rpo, Cc) from those associated with corrosion kinetics (Rcor, Ccor), providing a more physically meaningful interpretation of the protective performance of the inhibitor. The fitted electrochemical parameters obtained from this equivalent circuit are summarized in Table 2.

3.3. SEM and XRD

Figure 6a corresponds to a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of the polished surface of a 316LVM stainless steel specimen extracted from an unused component of a surgical device. A uniform and continuous topography is observed, characterized by parallel machining or finishing lines typical of cold-worked austenitic stainless steel. Several dark, scattered inclusions are visible, presumably nonmetallic, but none of them indicate active corrosion processes. No pitting, cracking, or accumulation of corrosion products is detected. This morphology is characteristic of an austenitic alloy in a stable passive condition, not previously exposed to aggressive environments such as physiological fluids or chemical agents. Similar results were reported by Rokosz et al. [34], who examined long-term preserved 316LVM stent tubes and found no signs of corrosion under SEM and XPS following magneto electropolishing. The X-Ray diffraction (XRD) pattern shown in Figure 6b confirms the exclusive presence of the austenitic (γ) phase, a face-centered cubic (FCC) structure, consistent with JCPDS card number 33-0397 (Austenite Fe–Ni–Cr). The most intense crystallographic planes are clearly identified at (111) ≈ 43.5°, (200) ≈ 50.7°, (220) ≈ 74.2°, and (311) ≈ 90.1°. The (111) reflection exhibits the highest relative intensity, suggesting a preferred crystallographic orientation commonly observed in cold-rolled or machined steels, consistent with Shiau et al. [35]. No secondary phases or corrosion-related oxides are detected, in agreement with previous studies on passivated 316LVM stainless steel subjected to protective surface treatments (Bukovec et al. [36]).
Overall, the XRD findings corroborate the SEM observations, indicating that the material in its initial condition retains a well defined austenitic crystalline structure without evidence of passive film degradation or formation of secondary corrosion products.
Figure 7a presents a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of the surface of a 316LVM stainless steel specimen extracted from a previously used surgical instrument and subsequently cleaned with the commercial degreasing agent West Oxyclean®. In contrast to the unused specimen shown in Figure 6a, multiple dark, irregularly distributed regions are observed, which are associated with localized corrosion processes particularly pitting and the accumulation of corrosion products. These features indicate degradation of the protective passive layer, likely exacerbated by prior exposure to physiological environments and by the action of the cleaning agent. The surface topography displays a loss of homogeneity and the presence of discontinuities, suggesting the initiation of localized attack.
The X-Ray diffraction (XRD) pattern shown in Figure 7b reveals the coexistence of the original austenitic (γ) phase with distinct diffraction peaks corresponding to corrosion products. The γ-phase reflections remain visible, such as the (200) peak at ≈50.7°, although with noticeably reduced relative intensity compared to the unused specimen (Figure 6b), suggesting partial loss of crystallographic integrity. Additional peaks appear at (104) ≈ 33.6°, (110) ≈ 36.2°, and (113) ≈ 52.1°, characteristic of chromium oxide (Cr2O3), indicating alteration of the passive film through dissolution or rearrangement of chromium-enriched regions. A low-intensity peak at (002) ≈ 60.8°, corresponding to lepidocrocite (γ-FeOOH), is also identified, confirming the initiation of active oxidation processes commonly associated with pitting in physiological environments. The presence of Cr2O3 and γ-FeOOH is consistent with recent studies describing passive film breakdown in 316L stainless steel under microbial and high-temperature alkaline conditions (Che et al.; Wang et al.) [37,38].
Taken together, the SEM and XRD analyses of the specimen treated with West Oxyclean® reveal a markedly altered surface condition, characterized by clear signatures of localized pitting corrosion and passive film degradation. The diffraction pattern not only shows attenuation of the austenitic γ-phase but also the emergence of corrosion products such as Cr2O3 and γ-FeOOH, indicating a tangible disruption of the steel’s protective barrier. These combined findings demonstrate that, although West Oxyclean® typically exhibits passive electrochemical behavior, its application under certain service or exposure conditions may facilitate localized breakdown of the passive layer, thereby posing a potential risk to the long-term structural integrity of reusable surgical instruments.
Figure 8 presents the SEM microstructural evolution of 316LVM stainless steel as a function of the concentration of orange peel extract used as a natural degreasing and inhibiting agent. At the lowest concentration (0.05%), the surface exhibits a markedly heterogeneous appearance, characterized by irregularly distributed dark regions and a central zone containing a concentrated accumulation of corrosion products. These features indicate partial deterioration of the passive layer, most likely triggered by local variations in chemical composition or microstructural heterogeneities such as MnS inclusions, carbides, or mechanically induced surface discontinuities. Such heterogeneities constitute preferential adsorption and activation sites where incomplete inhibitor coverage leads to intensified local dissolution. Despite this degradation, the morphology does not exhibit deep or well defined pitting cavities, suggesting that although the extract at 0.05% is insufficient to prevent the initial breakdown of the passive film, it still provides minimal retardation of severe localized attack.
Upon increasing the extract concentration to 0.08%, the surface morphology undergoes a notable improvement. The SEM micrograph reveals a clear reduction in the density, depth, and spatial distribution of corrosion related features, accompanied by an enhanced surface uniformity and diminished accumulation of degradation products. This transition indicates that higher concentrations promote more extensive adsorption of the organic constituents of the extract including limonene, alcohols, and ether containing molecules which contribute to partial stabilization of the passive layer. The reduced presence of active anodic sites suggests that the inhibitor begins to form a more cohesive film, albeit not fully continuous, resulting in a measurable decrease in local dissolution rates. Nevertheless, fine irregularities and isolated dark zones remain visible, reflecting that protection is improved but still incomplete.
At the highest concentration (0.12%), the SEM analysis reveals a striking transformation in surface condition. The micrograph displays a nearly pristine and homogeneous morphology, with clearly preserved machining lines and an absence of corrosion products or localized surface defects. This level of morphological integrity is characteristic of a stainless steel surface that maintains a fully stable passive state. The absence of dark corroded areas or surface irregularities strongly suggests that, at this concentration, the extract components achieve complete or near complete surface coverage, forming an adsorbed hydrophobic barrier that effectively prevents chloride penetration and suppresses both uniform and localized corrosion processes. The SEM results therefore demonstrate a clear concentration-dependent trend in protection efficacy, with the 0.12% solution providing the most robust and comprehensive inhibition.
The corresponding XRD patterns (Figure 8b,d,f) complement the SEM observations. At 0.05%, the diffraction profile shows several low to moderate-intensity peaks associated with corrosion products such as chromium oxide (Cr2O3) and iron oxyhydroxides (γ-FeOOH), together with a noticeable reduction in the intensity of the austenitic γ-phase reflections. This indicates passive film disruption and decreased crystallinity. At 0.08%, peaks corresponding to corrosion compounds are markedly diminished or absent, and the characteristic γ-phase reflections (111), (200), and (220) appear with enhanced intensity, suggesting partial restoration of passivity and reduced surface degradation. Finally, the specimen treated with 0.12% extract shows a diffraction pattern almost identical to that of the unused material: only the γ-phase reflections are present, with no detectable secondary oxides. This confirms full preservation of the crystalline structure and complete suppression of corrosion products at the highest inhibitor concentration.

3.4. Proposed Inhibition Mechanism

The synergistic interpretation of the electrochemical tests (Tafel polarization and EIS), the chemical characterization (FTIR), and the surface analyses (SEM and XRD) provides a coherent understanding of the inhibition mechanism exerted by the Citrus sinensis extract on 316LVM stainless steel. FTIR spectra confirmed that the extract is rich in terpenic compounds, predominantly limonene, along with alcohols, ethers and unsaturated functional groups, all of which possess adsorption-capable sites. These organic molecules exhibit both hydrophobic domains (C–H and C=C groups) and oxygenated moieties (C–O and C–O–C), enabling weak donor acceptor interactions and van der Waals forces with the metallic surface [39].
Electrochemical polarization curves demonstrated a significant reduction in corrosion current density (Icorr) and a shift in Ecorr towards more noble potentials at increasing inhibitor concentrations, indicating the progressive establishment of a protective surface layer. The absence of a defined pitting region in the inhibited systems further suggests improved passivity stability [40]. Complementary EIS measurements revealed enlarged capacitive semicircles, particularly for the 0.12% v/v formulation, consistent with an increase in charge transfer resistance (Rct) and thus with hindered electron transfer processes across the interface. These findings imply that the extract molecules adsorb onto the metal surface, reducing the availability of electrochemically active sites.
The SEM micrographs support this conclusion: while the 0.05% formulation exhibits dispersed areas of localized degradation and partial passive film disruption, the 0.12% concentration results in an almost pristine surface, with machining lines intact and no evidence of pitting or oxide accumulation [18]. This morphological preservation indicates that the adsorbed organic film successfully shields the substrate from chloride penetration and inhibits the nucleation of localized corrosion sites.
XRD analysis further corroborates the proposed mechanism. Samples treated with the 0.12% extract showed exclusively the γ-austenitic phase, without the characteristic peaks of Cr2O3 or γ-FeOOH observed in both the 0.05% formulation and the commercial cleaner. The absence of crystalline corrosion products confirms that the passive layer remained intact and chemically stable under the influence of the inhibitor.

4. Conclusions

The natural extract obtained from orange peel (Citrus sinensis) demonstrated a dual role as an effective cleaning agent and corrosion inhibitor for 316LVM stainless steel surgical instruments. Its application resulted in efficient removal of surface residues and contaminants while preserving the integrity of the metallic substrate, offering a biodegradable and non-aggressive alternative to conventional degreasers.
The formulation containing 0.12% v/v extract was identified as optimal, achieving an inhibition efficiency of 81.29%. This performance is attributed to the formation of a protective surface film composed of limonene, ethers, and alcohols, as confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy. In contrast, lower concentrations (e.g., 0.05%) were insufficient for effective cleaning and promoted localized depassivation phenomena.
SEM analysis of specimens treated with the 0.12% extract showed clean, defect-free surfaces with preserved machining lines and no signs of pitting or corrosion products. XRD patterns corroborated the preservation of the austenitic γ-phase, with no evidence of oxide-based corrosion products such as Cr2O3 or γ-FeOOH. Orange peel extract offers a sustainable and multifunctional alternative to conventional chemical agents, combining surface cleanliness with corrosion protection. The 0.12% concentration delivers optimal performance, maintaining the structural and surface integrity of the steel under simulated clinical cleaning conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.A. and G.O.-H.; Methodology, W.A.; Software, J.A.; Validation, W.A., J.A. and G.O.-H.; Formal Analysis, W.A.; Investigation, W.A.; Resources, G.O.-H.; Data Curation, J.A.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, W.A.; Writing—Review and Editing, G.O.-H.; Visualization, J.A.; Supervision, W.A.; Project Administration, W.A.; Funding Acquisition, G.O.-H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to data volume and confidentiality.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to their respective institutions for the support provided during the development of this research. Willian Aperador acknowledges the Universidad Militar Nueva Granada for its academic and technical support. Giovany Orozco-Hernández thanks the Universidad ECCI for facilitating the necessary resources and academic guidance. Jonnathan Aperador acknowledges the Universidad de Boyacá for its continuous encouragement and infrastructure support during the completion of this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Xavier, C.F.; Braga, J.O.; Pessoa, M.O.; Matencio, T.; Lins, V.F.C. Corrosion resistance of stainless-steel surgical tools in enzymatic and alkaline detergent. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 33, 104453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Magboo, R.; Drey, N.; Cooper, J.; Byers, H.; Shipolini, A.; Sanders, J. Predicting cardiac surgical site infection: Development and validation of the Barts Surgical Infection Risk tool. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2020, 128, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liang, C.; Shen, B.-C.; Chang, S.-H.; Muhtadin, M.; Tsai, J.-T. Microstructures evolution and properties of titanium vacuum sintering on metal injection molding 316 stainless steel via dip coating process. J. Manuf. Process. 2024, 131, 1073–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Butt, M.S.; Afsheen, R.; Saeed, H.; Javed, N.; Ghaffar, A. Promoting surgical pin performance: Chitosan and hydroxyapatite-based nano-composite coatings for antimicrobial and corrosion protection. Results Eng. 2025, 25, 103714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Trapasso, G.; Aricò, F. Organic carbonates as green media: From laboratory syntheses to industrial applications. Green Chem. 2025, 27, 6925–6966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Borson, S.Y.; Mahbub, S.; Rupali, N.S.; Anjum, K.; Siddiqua, A.; Begum, M.Y.; Goni, M.A.; Rana, S.; Hoque, M.A. Mixed micelle formation: Assessment of the impacts of atenolol drug on the physico-chemical parameters of sodium dodecyl sulfate and cetyldimethylethylammonium bromide mixture. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2025, 719, 136937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tayeb, W.; Edziri, H.; Elmsehli, S.; Horchani, M.; Bechi, S.; Chaieb, I.; Vilhena, K.S.S.; de Oliveira, M.S. Chemical composition and ecological bioactivity of Citrus sinensis essential oil. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2025, 123, 105079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ramos, A.F.; Kempka, A.P. Bioinformatics for circular economy research decision-making: A case study in obtaining bioactive peptides from Citrus sinensis peels via limonene synthase analysis. Sustain. Chem. Environ. 2024, 6, 100101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Holla, B.R.; Mahesh, R.; Manjunath, H.R.; Anjanapura, V.R. Plant extracts as green corrosion inhibitors for different kinds of steel: A review. Heliyon 2024, 10, e33748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kumar, H.; Guleria, S.; Kimta, N.; Nepovimova, E.; Dhanjal, D.S.; Sethi, N.; Suthar, T.; Shaikh, A.M.; Bela, K.; Harsányi, E. Applications of citrus peels valorisation in circular bioeconomy. J. Agric. Food Res. 2025, 20, 101780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yazdanpanah, I.; De Pietri, A.; Ben Hjal, A.; Khodabakhshi, M.; Biasiolo, L.; Dabalà, M. Electrochemical and localized corrosion characteristics of kolsterised and DLC-coated 316LVM stainless steel for biomedical applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2025, 693, 162808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zanzan, M.; Ezzaky, Y.; Achemchem, F.; Hamadi, F. Leveraging lactic acid bacteria biofilms and bioactive substances to counteract pathogenic biofilms in the dairy processing. Food Humanit. 2024, 3, 100448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wilson-Nieuwenhuis, J.; Holah, J. An overview of the chemistry of open plant cleaning and disinfection. In Reference Module in Food Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Martínez-Huitle, C.A.; Rodrigo, M.A.; Sirés, I.; Scialdone, O. A critical review on latest innovations and future challenges of electrochemical technology for the abatement of organics in water. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2023, 328, 122430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Anaman, S.Y.; Zhang, S.; Lee, J.-S.; Cho, H.-H.; Hong, S.-T. A comprehensive assessment of the galvanic corrosion behavior of an electrically assisted pressure joint of dissimilar stainless steel alloys under uniaxial tensile stress. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 19, 3110–3129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lee, E.S.; Seong, Y.; Jeong, J.I.; Ji, Y.; Eom, J.-H.; Park, C.; Kim, J.; Park, S.; Chung, J.H. Evaluation of physicochemical property changes in 3D-printed biodegradable medical devices under simulated oral physiological conditions. Biomed. Mater. 2025, 20, 025007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Suttiarporn, P.; Taithaisong, T.; Namkhot, S.; Luangkamin, S. Enhanced eugenol composition in clove essential oil by deep eutectic solvent-based ultrasonic extraction and microwave-assisted hydrodistillation. Molecules 2025, 30, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Elazabawy, O.E.; Attia, E.M.; Shawky, N.H. Eco-friendly orange peel extract as corrosion resistant for carbon steel’s deterioration in petroleum formation water. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 21943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pokorný, J.; Kubásek, J.; Donik, Č.; Nečas, D.; Hybášek, V.; Fojt, J.; Dobkowska, A.; Paulin, I.; Čapek, J.; Godec, M. Enhanced Performance of Austenitic Oxide Dispersion-Strengthened 316L Steel: A Study on Y2O3 Reinforcement and Corrosion Behaviour. Materials 2025, 18, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Montero-Calderon, A.; Cortes, C.; Zulueta, A. Green solvents and ultrasound-assisted extraction of bioactive orange (Citrus sinensis) peel compounds. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 16120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hachlafi, N.; Elbouzidi, A.; Batbat, A.; Taibi, M.; Jeddi, M.; Addi, M.; Naceiri Mrabti, H.; Fikri-Benbrahim, K. Chemical composition and assessment of the anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, cytotoxic and skin enzyme inhibitory activities of Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck essential oil and its major compound limonene. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bhattacharyya, S.; Sarma, S.D.; Dutta, P.; Begum, T.; Lal, M.; Perveen, K.; Bukhari, N.A. Insights into Citrus limon (L.) Osbeck peel essential oil from NE India: A study of its pharmacological properties and chemical composition. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2024, 27, 1362–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. İşcan, Ö. A hypothetical study on the structural properties of limonene compounds using semi-empirical (PM3) method with Arguslab software. Eurasian J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2024, 7, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yu, X.; Chao, D.; Wang, X.; Gao, F.; Lu, J.; Di, X.; Zhuang, X.; Chen, C.; Yao, F. Multivariate analysis between environmental factors and fruit quality of citrus at the core navel orange-producing area in China. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1510827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kamil, F.; Kassim, M.M.; Saleh Al-Saadie, K.A.; Almashhadani, H.A.; Abdulhussain, H.I.; Muhdi, Y.M.; Ahmed, O.; Abdul Razaq, N.H. Corrosion behaviour, kinetic and thermodynamic studies of water hyacinth extract as a corrosion inhibitor for low-carbon steel. Iraqi J. Ind. Res. 2024, 11, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Septianissa, S.; Chandrasari, A.Z. Corrosion rate of ASTM A53 steel in seawater influenced by variation in concentration of Mangifera indica L. peel extract. J. Appl. Eng. Technol. Sci. 2024, 6, 550–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pratikno, H.; Titah, H.S. Bio-corrosion on Steel Structure (ASTM A106 and A53) in Marine Environment. Asian J. Appl. Sci. 2016, 9, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, L.; Yang, J.; Fu, X. Effect of Ce content on modification behavior of inclusions and corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel. Materials 2024, 18, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, C.; Wang, R.; Jiang, Y.; Xie, H.; Liu, B.; Wang, S.; Du, H.; Zhang, Y. Effect of high temperature on the corrosion behavior and passive film composition of 316L stainless steel in concentrated NaOH solution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2025, 172, 021501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, D.; Zhao, T.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Hong, M.; Chen, D.; Zhang, J. Effect of copper content on the microstructure and electrochemical corrosion behavior of laser cladding 316L stainless steel coating. Corrosion 2025, 81, 216–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Deyab, M.A.; Mohsen, Q. Studies on the effects of avocado extract on carbon steel resistance to corrosion in salty formation water. Dent. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cheng, M.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Wei, X.; Feng, H.; Li, X.; Hu, S. Nanofiller engineering enables “three-in-one” enhancement of passive, active and self-healing properties for long-term anticorrosion coatings. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2025, 711, 164102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alontseva, D.; Yavuz, H.İ.; Azamatov, B.; Khoshnaw, F.; Safarova, Y.; Dogadkin, D.; Avcu, E.; Yamanoğlu, R. Improving corrosion and wear resistance of 316L stainless steel via in situ pure Ti and Ti6Al4V coatings: Tribocorrosion and electrochemical analysis. Materials 2025, 18, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rokosz, K.; Hryniewicz, T.; Rokicki, R. XPS measurements of AISI 316LVM SS biomaterial tubes after magnetoelectropolishing. Teh. Vjesn.-Tech. Gaz. 2014, 21, 799–805. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shiau, C.-H.; McMurtrey, M.D.; O’Brien, R.C.; Jerred, N.D.; Scott, R.D.; Lu, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Shao, L.; Sun, C. Deformation behavior and irradiation tolerance of 316L stainless steel fabricated by direct energy deposition. Mater. Des. 2021, 204, 109644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bukovec, M.; Xhanari, K.; Lešer, T.; Petovar, B.; Finšgar, M. Analysis of the enameled AISI 316LVM stainless steel. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2018, 27, 1122–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Che, Z.; Xue, H.; Liu, J.; Zhou, X.; Liu, W.; Yang, S.; Du, Y.; Cheng, X.; Li, X.; Liu, C. A novel understanding of dislocation density effect on the corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel with passive film nucleation growth kinetic calculation. Corros. Sci. 2025, 248, 112810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Li, F.; Li, Z.; Zhou, E.; Fan, Y.; Song, H.; Xu, Z.; Gu, T.; Wang, F.; et al. Accelerated destruction of passive film and microbial corrosion of 316L stainless steel via extracellular electron transfer. Angew. Chem. 2025, 137, e202425220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Krishnanjana, K.; Mohan Ganesh, G. Evaluation of Punica granatum peel as an eco-friendly green corrosion inhibitor for different structural steels in comparison with commercial inhibitors. J. Mol. Struct. 2026, 1352, 144573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Boutaqqa, O.; Ettahiri, W.; Adardour, M.; Safir, E.-H.; Alanazi, A.S.; Naamane, S.; Rais, Z.; Baouid, A.; Wiedmer, S.K.; Taleb, M. Synthesis and assessment of benzimidazole derivatives as effective corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in acidic environments: An experimental and theoretical approach. J. Mol. Struct. 2025, 1347, 143281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FTIR Analysis of functional groups in orange peel extracts at varying concentrations.
Figure 1. FTIR Analysis of functional groups in orange peel extracts at varying concentrations.
Cmd 06 00067 g001
Figure 2. Polarization curves of 316LVM stainless steel in corrosive solution with varying inhibitor concentrations and surface cleaning condition (Oxyclean®). This degradation is further linked to the specific conditions of the electrochemical test. The 150 min OCP exposure in an alkaline, oxidizing environment likely compromised the passive film. Notably, the oxidizing action of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) a component released by the cleaning agent played a crucial role in promoting adsorption of reactive species, local depassivation, and activation of corrosion sites. This aligns with findings by Li et al. [29], who showed how alkaline oxidative conditions destabilize Cr-rich films on 316L at elevated temperatures, and Wang et al. [30], who demonstrated that modifications in passive film structure impact pitting resistance and defect formation under aggressive environments.
Figure 2. Polarization curves of 316LVM stainless steel in corrosive solution with varying inhibitor concentrations and surface cleaning condition (Oxyclean®). This degradation is further linked to the specific conditions of the electrochemical test. The 150 min OCP exposure in an alkaline, oxidizing environment likely compromised the passive film. Notably, the oxidizing action of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) a component released by the cleaning agent played a crucial role in promoting adsorption of reactive species, local depassivation, and activation of corrosion sites. This aligns with findings by Li et al. [29], who showed how alkaline oxidative conditions destabilize Cr-rich films on 316L at elevated temperatures, and Wang et al. [30], who demonstrated that modifications in passive film structure impact pitting resistance and defect formation under aggressive environments.
Cmd 06 00067 g002
Figure 3. Nyquist plots of 316LVM stainless steel in solutions containing different concentrations of orange peel extract compared with the commercial cleaner West Oxyclean®.
Figure 3. Nyquist plots of 316LVM stainless steel in solutions containing different concentrations of orange peel extract compared with the commercial cleaner West Oxyclean®.
Cmd 06 00067 g003
Figure 4. Bode plots (|Z| and phase angle) for 316L stainless steel in the presence of different concentrations of the inhibitor extract and the commercial cleaner West Oxyclean®.
Figure 4. Bode plots (|Z| and phase angle) for 316L stainless steel in the presence of different concentrations of the inhibitor extract and the commercial cleaner West Oxyclean®.
Cmd 06 00067 g004
Figure 5. Equivalent electrical circuit used to fit the EIS data, consisting of the solution resistance (Rsoln) in series with two R–CPE branches representing the porous inhibitor film (Rpo, Cc, m) and the corrosion interface (Rcor, Ccor, n), respectively.
Figure 5. Equivalent electrical circuit used to fit the EIS data, consisting of the solution resistance (Rsoln) in series with two R–CPE branches representing the porous inhibitor film (Rpo, Cc, m) and the corrosion interface (Rcor, Ccor, n), respectively.
Cmd 06 00067 g005
Figure 6. (a) SEM micrograph of the unused 316LVM stainless steel surface showing machining lines and no evidence of corrosion or surface degradation. (b) XRD pattern of the same specimen confirming the exclusive presence of the austenitic γ-phase with FCC structure (JCPDS 00-033-0397).
Figure 6. (a) SEM micrograph of the unused 316LVM stainless steel surface showing machining lines and no evidence of corrosion or surface degradation. (b) XRD pattern of the same specimen confirming the exclusive presence of the austenitic γ-phase with FCC structure (JCPDS 00-033-0397).
Cmd 06 00067 g006
Figure 7. (a) SEM micrograph showing surface degradation and localized pitting on 316LVM stainless steel after exposure to West Oxyclean®. (b) XRD pattern revealing attenuation of the austenitic γ-phase and the presence of corrosion products, including Cr2O3 and γ-FeOOH.
Figure 7. (a) SEM micrograph showing surface degradation and localized pitting on 316LVM stainless steel after exposure to West Oxyclean®. (b) XRD pattern revealing attenuation of the austenitic γ-phase and the presence of corrosion products, including Cr2O3 and γ-FeOOH.
Cmd 06 00067 g007
Figure 8. SEM micrographs (a,c,e) and XRD patterns (b,d,f) of 316LVM stainless steel surfaces after treatment with orange peel extract at 0.05% (a,b), 0.08% (c,d), and 0.12% (e,f). The images show progressive surface improvement and structural preservation with increasing inhibitor concentration, confirming enhanced passivation and a reduction in corrosion products at higher extract levels.
Figure 8. SEM micrographs (a,c,e) and XRD patterns (b,d,f) of 316LVM stainless steel surfaces after treatment with orange peel extract at 0.05% (a,b), 0.08% (c,d), and 0.12% (e,f). The images show progressive surface improvement and structural preservation with increasing inhibitor concentration, confirming enhanced passivation and a reduction in corrosion products at higher extract levels.
Cmd 06 00067 g008
Table 1. Corrosion potential (Ecorr), corrosion current density (Icorr), corrosion rate, and inhibition efficiency (Ef%) for steel treated with orange peel extract at varying concentrations.
Table 1. Corrosion potential (Ecorr), corrosion current density (Icorr), corrosion rate, and inhibition efficiency (Ef%) for steel treated with orange peel extract at varying concentrations.
Electrochemical Parameters
SampleEcorr (mV)Beta ABeta CIcorr (μA/cm2)Corr Rate (mm/Year)Ef (%)
West Oxyclean−0.230.960.630.4970.0033-
Orange peel extract0.05%−0.260.840.560.7140.0048−43.65
0.08%−0.251.050.680.2070.001458.35
0.12%−0.191.120.720.0930.000681.29
Table 2. Fitted EIS parameters obtained from the two time constant equivalent circuit.
Table 2. Fitted EIS parameters obtained from the two time constant equivalent circuit.
SystemRsoln
Ω cm2
Cc
μF cm−2
mRpo
kΩ cm2
Ccor
μF cm−2
nRcor
kΩ cm2
0.12%12.4 ± 0.642.8 ± 2.10.89 ± 0.029.8 ± 0.4310 ± 180.92 ± 0.0241.4 ± 0.7
0.08%13.1 ± 0.739.6 ± 1.90.87 ± 0.037.2 ± 0.3275 ± 150.90 ± 0.0233.5 ± 0.6
0.05%11.9 ± 0.533.4 ± 1.80.84 ± 0.034.6 ± 0.2210 ± 120.82 ± 0.0216.1 ± 0.5
West Oxyclean®12.7 ± 0.536.1 ± 1.60.86 ± 0.035.8 ± 0.3245 ± 140.88 ± 0.0226.2 ± 0.4
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aperador, W.; Orozco-Hernández, G.; Aperador, J. Natural Orange Peel Extract as a Corrosion Inhibitor and Cleaning Agent for Surgical Instruments. Corros. Mater. Degrad. 2025, 6, 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/cmd6040067

AMA Style

Aperador W, Orozco-Hernández G, Aperador J. Natural Orange Peel Extract as a Corrosion Inhibitor and Cleaning Agent for Surgical Instruments. Corrosion and Materials Degradation. 2025; 6(4):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/cmd6040067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aperador, Willian, Giovany Orozco-Hernández, and Jonnathan Aperador. 2025. "Natural Orange Peel Extract as a Corrosion Inhibitor and Cleaning Agent for Surgical Instruments" Corrosion and Materials Degradation 6, no. 4: 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/cmd6040067

APA Style

Aperador, W., Orozco-Hernández, G., & Aperador, J. (2025). Natural Orange Peel Extract as a Corrosion Inhibitor and Cleaning Agent for Surgical Instruments. Corrosion and Materials Degradation, 6(4), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/cmd6040067

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop