Biocide Treatments on Stone Materials from Pompeii: Microbial Selection, Efficacy and Emerging Risks
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Design
2.2. Sampling and Material Collection
2.3. Microbial Counts and Culture Media
2.4. Isolation and Characterization of Microbial Community
2.4.1. Phenotypic Characterization
2.4.2. Analysis of Metabolic Activity and Microbial Viability
2.5. Phenotype Microarray (PM) Technology
2.6. Microbial Inocula on Stone Materials
2.7. Use of Biocides on Stone Materials
- chlorothalonil: 7.5 g × m−2, 20.0 g × m−2 and 40.0 g × m−2;
- IPBC: 1.0 g × m−2, 2.5 g × m−2 and 5.0 g × m−2.
2.8. Environmental Impact
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Preliminary Microbiological Characterization of Stone Materials
3.2. Biocide Tests
3.3. Preliminary Studies on Red Chromatic Alteration
3.4. M. roseus Phenotype Microarray
3.5. Environmental Impact of the Study
4. Conclusions
- (i)
- IPBC exhibited a clear dose-dependent antifungal activity, whereas chlorothalonil showed negligible inhibitory effects under the tested conditions, likely due to reduced bioavailability within porous stone matrices;
- (ii)
- IPBC treatment promoted the emergence of a red-pigmented bacterial population, preliminarily assigned to the species M. roseus, which was associated with chromatic alteration of the substrate. Phenotype Microarray analyses revealed a broad tolerance of this isolate to numerous chemical compounds, suggesting potential co-selection and cross-resistance mechanisms. Although IPBC effectively reduced fungal growth, it also favored the emergence of a highly tolerant bacterial population and induced undesirable chromatic changes;
- (iii)
- The estimated environmental impact of the experimental activities (approximately 1200 kg CO2 eq.) underscores the importance of integrating sustainability criteria into conservation research and practice.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Scorrano, G.; Viva, S.; Pinotti, T.; Fabbri, P.F.; Rickards, O.; Macciardi, F. Bioarchaeological and Palaeogenomic Portrait of Two Pompeians That Died during the Eruption of Vesuvius in 79 AD. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ministero della Cultura Parco Archeologico Di Pompei—Area Archeologica di Pompei. Available online: https://cultura.gov.it/luogo/parco-archeologico-di-pompei-area-archeologica-di-pompei (accessed on 13 March 2025).
- Luongo, G.; Perrotta, A.; Scarpati, C.; De Carolis, E.; Patricelli, G.; Ciarallo, A. Impact of the AD 79 Explosive Eruption on Pompeii, II. Causes of Death of the Inhabitants Inferred by Stratigraphic Analysis and Areal Distribution of the Human Casualties. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2003, 126, 169–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beard, M. The Fires of Vesuvius—Pompeii Lost and Found; Belknap, P., Ed.; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Kastenmeier, P.; Di Maio, G.; Balassone, G.; Boni, M.; Joachimski, M.; Mondillo, N. The Source of Stone Building Materials from the Pompeii Archaeological Area and Its Surroundings. Period. Di Mineral. 2010, 79, 39–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piovesan, R.; Maritan, L.; Meneghin, G.; Previato, C.; Baklouti, S.; Sassi, R.; Mazzoli, C. Stones of the Façade of the Sarno Baths, Pompeii: A Mindful Construction Choice. J. Cult. Herit. 2019, 40, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fidanza, M.R.; Caneva, G. Natural Biocides for the Conservation of Stone Cultural Heritage: A Review. J. Cult. Herit. 2019, 38, 271–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Satta, M.L.; Ruggieri, N.; Tempesta, G.; Galassi, S. Remains of the Ancient Colonnade in the Archaeological Site of Pompeii, Italy: Vulnerability Analysis and Strengthening Proposal. J. Cult. Herit. 2021, 52, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazzaglia, A. The Information System of Pompeii Sustainable Preservation Project. A Tool for the Collection, Management and Sharing of Knowledge Useful for Conservation and Renovation of Archaeological Monuments. In Proceedings of the ArcheoFOSS XIII Workshop & Open Software, Hardware, Processes, Data and Formats in Archaeological Research, online, 23–26 November 2021; p. 14. [Google Scholar]
- Vadrucci, M. Sustainable Cultural Heritage Conservation: A Challenge and an Opportunity for the Future. Sustainability 2025, 17, 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seila, F.; Selim, G.; Newisar, M. A Systematic Review of Factors Contributing to Ineffective Cultural Heritage Management. Sustainability 2025, 17, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Della Torre, S. Italian Perspective on the Planned Preventive Conservation of Architectural Heritage. Front. Archit. Res. 2021, 10, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murena, F.; Mocerino, L.; Quaranta, F.; Toscano, D. Impact on Air Quality of Cruise Ship Emissions in Naples, Italy. Atmos. Environ. 2018, 187, 70–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cozzolino, A.; Bonanomi, G.; Motti, R. The Role of Stone Materials, Environmental Factors, and Management Practices in Vascular Plant-Induced Deterioration: Case Studies from Pompeii, Herculaneum, Paestum, and Velia Archaeological Parks (Italy). Plants 2025, 14, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cirone, M.; Figoli, A.; Galiano, F.; La Russa, M.F.; Macchia, A.; Mancuso, R.; Ricca, M.; Rovella, N.; Taverniti, M.; Ruffolo, S.A. Innovative Methodologies for the Conservation of Cultural Heritage against Biodeterioration: A Review. Coatings 2023, 13, 1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilian, R.; Borgatta, L.; Wendler, E. Investigation of the Deterioration Mechanisms Induced by Moisture and Soluble Salts in the Necropolis of Porta Nocera, Pompeii (Italy). Herit. Sci. 2023, 11, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tonon, C.; Favero-Longo, S.E.; Matteucci, E.; Piervittori, R.; Croveri, P.; Appolonia, L.; Meirano, V.; Serino, M.; Elia, D. Microenvironmental Features Drive the Distribution of Lichens in the House of the Ancient Hunt, Pompeii, Italy. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2019, 136, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prieto-Taboada, N.; Fdez-Ortiz de Vallejuelo, S.; Veneranda, M.; Marcaida, I.; Morillas, H.; Maguregui, M.; Castro, K.; De Carolis, E.; Osanna, M.; Madariaga, J.M. Study of the Soluble Salts Formation in a Recently Restored House of Pompeii by In-Situ Raman Spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Michette, M.; Bichlmair, S.; Kilian, R. Diagnosing Decay Mechanisms at the Porta Nocera Necropolis, Pompeii: The First Step Towards Effective Preventive Conservation. Stud. Conserv. 2018, 63, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez, M.C.; García-Diego, F.J.; Merello, P.; D’Antoni, P.; Fernández-Navajas, A.; Ribera i Lacomba, A.; Ferrazza, L.; Pérez-Miralles, J.; Baró, J.-L.; Merce, P.; et al. Ariadne’s House (Pompeii, Italy) Wall Paintings: A Multidisciplinary Study of Its Present State Focused on a Future Restoration and Preventive Conservation. Mater. Constr. 2013, 63, 449–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Feo, E.; Nastri, E. Drones for Survey in the Field of Restoration: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Preservation of Cultural Heritage. Disegnarecon 2022, 15, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merello, P.; García-Diego, F.-J.; Zarzo, M. Evaluation of Corrective Measures Implemented for the Preventive Conservation of Fresco Paintings in Ariadne’s House (Pompeii, Italy). Chem. Cent. J. 2013, 7, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Merello, P.; García-Diego, F.-J.; Zarzo, M. Diagnosis of Abnormal Patterns in Multivariate Microclimate Monitoring: A Case Study of an Open-Air Archaeological Site in Pompeii (Italy). Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 488, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pinna, D. Microbial Recolonization of Artificial and Natural Stone Artworks after Cleaning and Coating Treatments. J. Cult. Herit. 2023, 61, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gîfu, I.C.; Ianchiș, R.; Nistor, C.L.; Petcu, C.; Fierascu, I.; Fierascu, R.C. Polyelectrolyte Coatings—A Viable Approach for Cultural Heritage Protection. Materials 2023, 16, 2873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Casanova Municchia, A.; Fidanza, M.R.; Caneva, G. Advances in Testing the Interference of Biocides on Stone Materials: A Comparative Analysis and Guidelines for a Standardised Approach. J. Cult. Herit. 2023, 64, 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paolino, B.; Sorrentino, M.C.; Pacifico, S. Greener Solutions for Biodeterioration of Organic-Media Cultural Heritage: Where Are We? Herit. Sci. 2024, 12, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mateus, D.; Costa, F.; de Jesus, V.; Malaquias, L. Biocides Based on Essential Oils for Sustainable Conservation and Restoration of Mural Paintings in Built Cultural Heritage. Sustainability 2024, 16, 11223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russo, R.; Palla, F. Plant Essential Oils as Biocides in Sustainable Strategies for the Conservation of Cultural Heritage. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morezzi, E.; Vagnarelli, T.; Borgioli, L. Ruderi e Vegetazione. Sperimentazioni Di Restauro Archeologico Alla Necropoli Della Banditaccia Di Cerveteri; Edizioni Quasar di Severino Tognon s.r.l.: Rome, Italy, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Kohzadi, S.; Müller, A.; Österlund, H.; Viklander, M. Building Surface Materials as Potential Sources of Biocides: Insights from Laboratory Leaching Investigations of Different Material Types. Chemosphere 2024, 368, 143741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tichy, J.; Waldherr, M.; Ortbauer, M.; Graf, A.; Sipek, B.; Jembrih-Simbuerger, D.; Sterflinger, K.; Piñar, G. Pretty in Pink? Complementary Strategies for Analysing Pink Biofilms on Historical Buildings. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 904, 166737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tezel, U.; Pavlostathis, S.G. Quaternary Ammonium Disinfectants: Microbial Adaptation, Degradation and Ecology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cappitelli, F.; Sorlini, C. Microorganisms Attack Synthetic Polymers in Items Representing Our Cultural Heritage. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 564–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Palmieri, M.; Lasserre, B.; Marino, D.; Quaranta, L.; Raffi, M.; Ranalli, G. The Environmental Footprint of Scientific Research: Proposals and Actions to Increase Sustainability and Traceability. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sorlini, C.; Cesarotti, E.; Cariati, F.; Cotali, M.; Bianchi, G.; Ranalli, G. Research on Chromatic Alterations of Marble Samples from Certosa of Pavia: Note I. Ann. Microbiol. Enzimol. 1991, 41, 267–274. [Google Scholar]
- Zanardini, E.; Andreoni, V.; Borin, S.; Cappitelli, F.; Daffonchio, D.; Talotta, P.; Sorlini, C.; Ranalli, G.; Bruni, S.; Cariati, F. Lead-Resistant Microorganisms from Red Stains of Marble of the Certosa of Pavia, Italy and Use of Nucleic Acid-Based Techniques for Their Detection. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 1997, 40, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranalli, G.; Andreotti, A.; Colombini, M.P.; Corti, C.; Lima, G.; Rampazzi, L.; Saviano, G.; Vitullo, D.; Palmieri, D.; Zanardini, E. Biodeterioration of Carbographic Ribbon: Isolation, Identification of Causal Agents and Forensic Implications. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 133, 1843–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bergey, D.H.; Holt, J.G.; Bergey, D.H.; Holt, J.G. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2000; ISBN 9780683006032. [Google Scholar]
- Ranalli, G.; Belli, C.; Lustrato, G.; Pizzella, L.; Liberatore, L.; Bressan, M. Effects of Combined Chemical and Biological Treatments on the Degradability of Vulcanization Accelerators. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2008, 192, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liberatore, L.; Bressan, M.; Belli, C.; Lustrato, G.; Ranalli, G. Chemical and Biological Combined Treatments for the Removal of Pesticides from Wastewaters. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012, 223, 4751–4759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viti, C.; Mini, A.; Ranalli, G.; Lustrato, G.; Giovannetti, L. Response of Microbial Communities to Different Doses of Chromate in Soil Microcosms. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2006, 34, 125–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranalli, G.; Bottura, G.; Taddei, P.; Garavani, M.; Marchetti, R.; Sorlini, C. Composting of Solid and Sludge Residues from Agricultural and Food Industries. Bioindicators of Monitoring and Compost Maturity. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2001, 36, 415–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bosch-Roig, P.; Decorosi, F.; Giovannetti, L.; Ranalli, G.; Viti, C. Connecting Phenome to Genome in Pseudomonas Stutzeri 5190: An Artwork Biocleaning Bacterium. Res. Microbiol. 2016, 167, 757–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tao, H.; Fang, C.; Xiao, Y.; Jin, Y. The Toxicity and Health Risk of Chlorothalonil to Non-Target Animals and Humans: A Systematic Review. Chemosphere 2024, 358, 142241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raimond, L.; Halbus, A.F.; Athab, Z.H.; Paunov, V.N. Antimould Action of Ziram and IPBC Loaded in Functionalised Nanogels against Aspergillus niger and Penicillium chrysogenum. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 8178–8192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caprari, C.; Bucci, A.; Divino, F.; Giovacchini, S.; Mirone, E.; Monaco, P.; Perrella, G.; Quaranta, L.; Scalabrino, S.; Ranalli, G. Collection Methods of Wild Barn Owl Pellets at Low Environmental Contamination and Proposals of Microbiological and Ecological Investigations. Ann. Microbiol. 2024, 74, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaylarde, C.C.; Baptista-Neto, J.A. Microbiologically Induced Aesthetic and Structural Changes to Dimension Stone. npj Mater. Degrad. 2021, 5, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Qian, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, F.; Wang, W.; Gu, J.-D. Innovative Approaches for the Processes Involved in Microbial Biodeterioration of Cultural Heritage Materials. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2022, 75, 102716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gadd, G.M.; Fomina, M.; Pinzari, F. Fungal Biodeterioration and Preservation of Cultural Heritage, Artwork, and Historical Artifacts: Extremophily and Adaptation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2024, 88, e00200-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mazzoli, R.; Giuffrida, M.G.; Pessione, E. Back to the Past: Find the Guilty Bug—Microorganisms Involved in the Biodeterioration of Archeological and Historical Artifacts. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 6393–6407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Branysova, T.; Demnerova, K.; Durovic, M.; Stiborova, H. Microbial Biodeterioration of Cultural Heritage and Identification of the Active Agents over the Last Two Decades. J. Cult. Herit. 2022, 55, 245–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Negi, A.; Sarethy, I.P. Microbial Biodeterioration of Cultural Heritage: Events, Colonization, and Analyses. Microb. Ecol. 2019, 78, 1014–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lo Schiavo, S.; De Leo, F.; Urzì, C. Present and Future Perspectives for Biocides and Antifouling Products for Stone-Built Cultural Heritage: Ionic Liquids as a Challenging Alternative. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartoli, F.; Zuena, M.; Sodo, A.; Caneva, G. The Efficiency of Biocidal Silica Nanosystems for the Conservation of Stone Monuments: Comparative In Vitro Tests against Epilithic Green Algae. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, L.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, J.; Shao, C.; Zhang, Q. Thermal Degradation and Product Analysis of 3-Iodo-2-Propyl-Butylcarbamate as a Wood Preservative. Polymers 2022, 14, 4531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Villar-dePablo, M.; Ascaso, C.; Rodríguez-Pérez, E.; Urizal, M.; Wierzchos, J.; Pérez-Ortega, S.; de los Ríos, A. Innovative Approaches to Accurately Assess the Effectiveness of Biocide-Based Treatments to Fight Biodeterioration of Cultural Heritage Monuments. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 897, 165318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ciok, M.; Diener, J.; Otte, F.; Feimer, J.; Nichterlein, M.; Kalkhof, S.; Noll, M. Biocide-Containing Facades Alter Culture-Based Bacterial and Fungal Community Composition and Resistance Patterns to Octylisothiazolinone. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pinna, D. Coping with Biological Growth on Stone Heritage Objects; Apple Academic Press: Toronto, ON, Canada; Waretown, NJ, USA, 2017; ISBN 9781315365510. [Google Scholar]
- National Library of Medicine (US). N.C. for B.I. PubChem Compound Summary for CID 62097, 3-Iodo-2-Propynyl Butylcarbamate; National Library of Medicine (US): Bethesda, MA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, C.; Zhu, G.; Pan, Z.; Tian, M.; Li, X.; Du, S.; Gao, T.; Xue, F. Determination and Correlation of Solubility of Chlorothalonil in 10 Pure Solvents and One Binary Solvent at 288.15–323.15 K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2025, 70, 1520–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooney, J.J.; Marks, H.W.; Smith, A.M. Isolation and Identification of Canthaxanthin from Micrococcus roseus. J. Bacteriol. 1966, 92, 342–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schwartzel, E.H.; Cooney, J.J. Isolation and Identification of Echinenone from Micrococcus roseus. J. Bacteriol. 1970, 104, 272–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cámara, B.; De los Ríos, A.; Urizal, M.; Álvarez de Buergo, M.; Varas, M.J.; Fort, R.; Ascaso, C. Characterizing the Microbial Colonization of a Dolostone Quarry: Implications for Stone Biodeterioration and Response to Biocide Treatments. Microb. Ecol. 2011, 62, 299–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Russell, A. Biocide Use and Antibiotic Resistance: The Relevance of Laboratory Findings to Clinical and Environmental Situations. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2003, 3, 794–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maillard, J.-Y. Resistance of Bacteria to Biocides. Microbiol. Spectr. 2018, 6, 10.1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wesgate, R.; Grasha, P.; Maillard, J.-Y. Use of a Predictive Protocol to Measure the Antimicrobial Resistance Risks Associated with Biocidal Product Usage. Am. J. Infect. Control 2016, 44, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- SCENIHR. Effects of Biocides on Antibiotic Resistance; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. Biocides in the Context of Antimicrobial Resistance. Available online: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/b5d3fd50-b43a-42e1-89b9-f658ef4fda41/content (accessed on 4 April 2026).
- O’Reilly, P.; Loiselle, G.; Darragh, R.; Slipski, C.; Bay, D.C. Reviewing the Complexities of Bacterial Biocide Susceptibility and in Vitro Biocide Adaptation Methodologies. npj Antimicrob. Resist. 2025, 3, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Willmott, T.; Jadaan, L.; Humphreys, G.J.; Lu, J.R.; McBain, A.J.; Chapman, J. Sustainable Application of Biocides to Promote Hygiene and Minimize Antimicrobial Resistance. Sustain. Microbiol. 2024, 1, qvae015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sassi, A.; Basher, N.S.; Kirat, H.; Meradji, S.; Ibrahim, N.A.; Idres, T.; Touati, A. The Role of the Environment (Water, Air, Soil) in the Emergence and Dissemination of Antimicrobial Resistance: A One Health Perspective. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sousa, M.; Machado, I.; Simões, L.C.; Simões, M. Biocides as Drivers of Antibiotic Resistance: A Critical Review of Environmental Implications and Public Health Risks. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 2025, 25, 100557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walczak, Ł.J.; Kwiatkowska, M.; Twarowski, B.; Kubacka, M.; Paluch, J.; Herbet, M. Disinfectant-Induced Bacterial Resistance and Antibiotic Cross-Resistance—Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance. Clin. Exp. Med. 2025, 26, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]








| Type Consumptions | Evaluation of CO2 Eq. Emission | ||||
| Parameter | Unit | Amount | K Conversion to CO2 | CO2 Yield (kg) | |
| Samples | Location | Surface Powdering/Disintegration | Mortar Joint Erosion | Lacunae | Structural Stability | Conservation Condition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Northern Sector | Severe | Severe | Diffuse | Fair | Poor |
| 4 | Eastern Sector | Severe | Severe | Diffuse | Poor | Poor |
| 7 | Northern Sector | Moderate | Severe | Localized | Fair | Fair |
| 9 | Western Sector | Severe | Severe | Diffuse | Poor | Very poor |
| 10 | Domus A | Moderate | Moderate | Localized | Good | Fair |
| 12 | Thermae | Moderate | Severe | Localized | Fair | Fair |
| 13 | Insula Occidentalis | Moderate | Moderate | Localized | Fair | Fair |
| 16-16bis | Domus C | Severe | Severe | Extensive | Poor | Very poor |
| 20 | Thermae | Severe | Severe | Extensive | Poor | Very poor |
| 1a | Insula Occidentalis | Severe | Severe | Diffuse | Poor | Poor |
| 2a | Amphitheater | Severe | Moderate | Diffuse | Fair | Poor |
| Samples | Bacteria (log CFU × g−1) | Fungi (log MFU × g−1) | Algae | ATP (pg × g−1) | DT (h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 5.0 | 4.0 | - | High | 3 |
| 4 | 5.1 | 4.0 | - | High | 3 |
| 7 | 1.9 | 2.2 | + | Low | 6 |
| 9 | 2.0 | 4.9 | + | Very high | 2 |
| 10 | 1.5 | 2.0 | - | Low | 6 |
| 12 | 1.7 | 2.3 | - | Low | 5 |
| 13 | 1.5 | 2.0 | + | Low | 6 |
| 16-16bis | 6.3 | 4.9 | + | Very high | 2 |
| 20 | 6.2 | 2.7 | + | Very high | 2 |
| 1a | 4.0 | 4.1 | + | High | 3 |
| 2a | 4.0 | 4.1 | + | High | 3 |
| Colonies Characteristics | Data |
|---|---|
| Colony in PCA | Spherical |
| Colony color | Red |
| Temperature range (°C) | 5–37 |
| Temperature optimum (°C) | 25–35 |
| Gram reaction | + |
| Morphology cells | Tetrads |
| Motility | - |
| NaCl range (% w/v) | 0–5 |
| KOH test | - |
| NaCl optimum (% w/v) | 0–2.0 |
| Catalase test | + |
| Oxidase test | + |
| Coagulase test | - |
| Glucose fermentation | + |
| Aerobic | + |
| API 20NE activity of Aesculin | + |
| API 50CH acid production on | |
| Glycerol | + |
| n-Xylose | + |
| n-Glucose | + |
| Inositol | + |
| API ZYM Substrate | Activity |
|---|---|
| alkaline phosphatase | ++++ |
| esterase (C4) | + |
| esterase–lipase (C8) | + |
| lipase (C14) | - |
| leucine arylamidase | +++ |
| valine arylamidase | ++ |
| cistine arylamidase | +++ |
| trypsin | - |
| α-chymotripsin | - |
| acid phosphatase | ++ |
| phosphoamidase | ++++ |
| α -galactosidase | - |
| β-galactosidase | - |
| β -glucuronidase | - |
| α -glucosidase | + |
| β -glucosidase | + |
| N-acetil- β -glucosamidase | +++ |
| α -mannosidase | - |
| α -fucosidase | - |
| Chemical Sensitivity | Samples | % |
|---|---|---|
| High resistance (IC50: 3.0–4.4) | 53 | 73.61 |
| Intermediate resistance (IC50: 2.1–2.99) | 6 | 8.33 |
| Low resistance (IC50: 1.0–2.09) | 5 | 6.94 |
| No resistance (IC50: 0.6–0.9) | 8 | 11.11 |
| Total compounds | 72 | 100.00 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Ranalli, G.; Bosch-Roig, P.; Caprari, C.; Decorosi, F.; Rampazzi, L.; Saviano, G.; Viti, C.; Zanardini, E. Biocide Treatments on Stone Materials from Pompeii: Microbial Selection, Efficacy and Emerging Risks. Heritage 2026, 9, 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9060242
Ranalli G, Bosch-Roig P, Caprari C, Decorosi F, Rampazzi L, Saviano G, Viti C, Zanardini E. Biocide Treatments on Stone Materials from Pompeii: Microbial Selection, Efficacy and Emerging Risks. Heritage. 2026; 9(6):242. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9060242
Chicago/Turabian StyleRanalli, Giancarlo, Pilar Bosch-Roig, Claudio Caprari, Francesca Decorosi, Laura Rampazzi, Gabriella Saviano, Carlo Viti, and Elisabetta Zanardini. 2026. "Biocide Treatments on Stone Materials from Pompeii: Microbial Selection, Efficacy and Emerging Risks" Heritage 9, no. 6: 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9060242
APA StyleRanalli, G., Bosch-Roig, P., Caprari, C., Decorosi, F., Rampazzi, L., Saviano, G., Viti, C., & Zanardini, E. (2026). Biocide Treatments on Stone Materials from Pompeii: Microbial Selection, Efficacy and Emerging Risks. Heritage, 9(6), 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9060242

