Next Article in Journal
Semantic Representation and Location Provenance of Cultural Heritage Information: the National Gallery Collection in London
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Ecological Impact of Ultramarathon Events in Protected Natural Sites: ‘Le Grand Raid Réunion’
Previous Article in Journal
Semantic Bridging of Cultural Heritage Disciplines and Tasks
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Monumental Mistake of Evicting Bats from Archaeological Sites—A Reflection from New Delhi
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Heritage 2019, 2(1), 631-647;

Architectural Heritage: A Discussion on Conservation and Safety

Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, 06125 Perugia, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 20 January 2019 / Revised: 4 February 2019 / Accepted: 11 February 2019 / Published: 13 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vulnerability Assessment of Cultural Heritage)
Full-Text   |   PDF [4410 KB, uploaded 13 February 2019]   |  


This paper presents a study carried out in the Italian region of Umbria, after the 2016 Central Italy earthquake. The aim is to address the problem of the conservation and protection of architectural heritage in Italy. The application of retrofitting strategies, while improving the seismic performance of historic—and frequently listed by conservation bodies—buildings, will not significantly alter their appearance, will be reversible, and fall within the principle of minimum intervention (minimal (least) intervention (or conservative repair)). These issues were evaluated in the paper by considering the different points of view of structural engineers and conservators. Heavy structural-oriented interventions as well as the underestimation of the importance of the structural safety for masonry monuments has produced, in the past, irreversible damage to important buildings and monuments, and loss of architectural heritage in Italy. The requirement of structural safety, especially for monuments located in seismic-prone areas, is compared with the need for conservation. The Italian building guidelines for interventions of cultural heritage are also discussed, highlighting some limitations and important advancements. View Full-Text
Keywords: earthquake engineering; masonry structures; conservation; structural safety earthquake engineering; masonry structures; conservation; structural safety

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Borri, A.; Corradi, M. Architectural Heritage: A Discussion on Conservation and Safety. Heritage 2019, 2, 631-647.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Heritage EISSN 2571-9408 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top