Next Article in Journal
Research on Sequential Decision-Making of Major Accidents with Incomplete Information
Next Article in Special Issue
Timescales Associated with the Evolution of Reactive Scalar Gradient in Premixed Turbulent Combustion: A Direct Numerical Simulation Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
A Case Study on the Evacuation of People during a Fire in the Workshop of a Large Factory
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Flame Stabilisation Mechanism for Under-Expanded Hydrogen Jets

by Keiji Takeno 1,*, Hikaru Kido 1, Hiroki Takeda 1, Shohei Yamamoto 2, Volodymyr Shentsov 3, Dmitriy Makarov 3 and Vladimir Molkov 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 21 December 2023 / Revised: 17 January 2024 / Accepted: 30 January 2024 / Published: 6 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Combustion and Fire I)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

1. Figure 1, Why is the flame blown off at intermediate pressures? A more detailed explanation is needed.

2. Line 101-116, As Figure 2 doesn't show the combustion characteristics, such as "spherical flame structures with a diameter of about 5-7 mm", " lame structures  are formed one after another", "flame retention" ..., mentioned in these two paragraphs, I can't understand the interpretation to Figure 2. A more detailed description of Figure 2 or more consecutive images are needed.

3. Line 162, what are the spherical structures? It is difficult to see for me.

4. Line 228, what does 5-7 stands for? What is the physical principle of this calculation?

5. The Borghi diagram should be given with the results plotted.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

I suggest the authors make a thorough proof-reading. Some sentences need to be rephrased.

Author Response

Please see the attached files.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This looks like a useful paper analyzing flame stabilization through visualization of hydrogen jet flames.

I would like to ask you to review the following points.

- There appears to be a redundant expression. Please be concise to avoid redundancy. (line 121-130)
- Please specify the units of the numbers shown in the Figure 2 and 4.
In the description of flame stabilization(line 238), the explanation was based on the results of previous studies, but it needs to be explained in connection with the schlieren images observed in this study. Although the schlieren images are fragmentary, it is necessary to elaborate on whether the data (described in the chapter 3(line 238)) and shapes similar to the mechanism described in Figure 8 were observed.
- Check the typo errors throughout the manuscript. (line 126; Figure 4, line 147; quipped, line248; HO2)

Author Response

Please see the attached files.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Accepted

Back to TopTop