Grain Versus Grain-Boundary Contributions to Thermal Conductivity in Prospective Oxide Ceramics for Next-Generation Thermal Barrier Coatings
Abstract
1. Introduction
- rare-earth silicates RE2SiO5 and RE2Si2O7 [13] (thermal conductivity ≈ 1.5–2.0 W m−1 K−1, albeit with somewhat lower CTEs);
- perovskite oxides (SrCeO3, BaZrO3 and their solid solutions) [14], with CTEs of 11.6–12.4 × 10−6 K−1 and thermal conductivities of 1.2–3.5 W m−1 K−1;
- high-entropy ceramics (HECs) based on multicomponent pyrochlores, fluorites, perovskites, and tantalates, in which configurational entropy simultaneously stabilizes the structure, intensifies phonon scattering, and yields thermal conductivities comparable to those of amorphous solids (0.8–1.5 W m−1 K−1), while improving hardness and sintering resistance [4,17].
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Initial Materials Selection
2.2. Correction for Sample Porosity
2.3. Calculation of Grain-Boundary Thermal Resistance
2.4. Calculation of Specific Heat Capacity
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Assessment of the Accuracy of Specific-Heat-Capacity Calculations
3.2. Binary Oxides
3.3. Fluorite and Pyrochlore Oxides A2B2O7
3.4. Defective Fluorite Oxides A3BO7
3.5. Fergusonite, Monazite, and Related ABO4 Oxides
3.6. Perovskite Oxides ABO3
3.7. Comparative Analysis of All Oxide Classes as Candidate Materials for Next-Generation Thermal Barrier Coatings
4. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wei, Z.-Y.; Meng, G.-H.; Chen, L.; Li, G.-R.; Liu, M.-J.; Zhang, W.-X.; Zhao, L.-N.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X.-D.; Wan, C.-L.; et al. Progress in Ceramic Materials and Structure Design toward Advanced Thermal Barrier Coatings. J. Adv. Ceram. 2022, 11, 985–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondal, K.; Nuñez, L.; Downey, C.M.; Van Rooyen, I.J. Recent Advances in the Thermal Barrier Coatings for Extreme Environments. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 2021, 4, 208–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, X.; Rivellini, K.; Ruggiero, P.; Wildridge, G. Novel Thermal Barrier Coatings with Phase Composite Structures for Extreme Environment Applications: Concept, Process, Evaluation and Performance. Coatings 2023, 13, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, H.; Xing, Y.; Dai, F.; Wang, H.; Su, L.; Miao, L.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Y.; Qi, X.; Yao, L.; et al. High-Entropy Ceramics: Present Status, Challenges, and a Look Forward. J. Adv. Ceram. 2021, 10, 385–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakare, J.G.; Pandey, C.; Mahapatra, M.M.; Mulik, R.S. Thermal Barrier Coatings—A State of the Art Review. Met. Mater. Int. 2021, 27, 1947–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Guo, X.; Jung, Y.-G.; Li, L.; Knapp, J. Lanthanum Zirconate Based Thermal Barrier Coatings: A Review. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 323, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, C.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Qu, Z.; Du, A.; Wu, R.; Pan, W. Glass-like Thermal Conductivity in Ytterbium-Doped Lanthanum Zirconate Pyrochlore. Acta Mater. 2010, 58, 6166–6172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Wei, X.; Padture, N.P.; Klemens, P.G.; Gell, M.; García, E.; Miranzo, P.; Osendi, M.I. Low-Thermal-Conductivity Rare-Earth Zirconates for Potential Thermal-Barrier-Coating Applications. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2002, 85, 3031–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, J.; Zhang, M.; Ma, X.; Zhao, S.; Jiang, T.; Wen, W. Synthesis and Thermal Behavior of Rare-Earth-Niobate Ceramics with Fluorite Structure. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 42299–42308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, K.; Wang, Q.; Cao, Y.; Shao, G.; Wang, Y. Multicomponent Rare-Earth Cerate and Zirconocerate Ceramics for Thermal Barrier Coating Materials. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 1720–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Li, J.; Jiang, C.; Song, J.; Yang, X.; Ma, X.; Luo, K.; Wu, P.; Chong, X.; Feng, J. Advanced Rare Earth Tantalate RETaO4 (RE=Dy, Gd and Sm) with Excellent Oxygen/Thermal Barrier Performance. J. Rare Earths 2024, 42, 1595–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, P.; Feng, Y.; Li, Y.; Pan, W.; Zong, P.; Huang, M.; Han, Y.; Yang, Z.; Chen, H.; Gong, Q.; et al. Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Ferroelastic RENbO4 (RE = Nd, Sm, Gd, Dy, Er, Yb) for Thermal Barrier Coatings. Scr. Mater. 2020, 180, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Z.; Li, M.; Zhou, Y. Thermal Properties of Single-Phase Y2SiO5. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 29, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shishkin, R.A. State-of-the-Art and Prospective Materials for Thermal Barrier Coatings. Phys. Usp. 2025, 68, 232–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; Wang, J.; Hui, Y.; Chen, X. Preparation and Properties of LaMgAl11O19 Thermal Barrier Coatings Doped with Gd2O3. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 4174–4179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.; Yang, Y.; Dai, J.; Zou, L.; Guo, L. High-Entropy Strategy Makes Rare-Earth Phosphates More Suitable for Use as Thermal Barrier Coating Materials. Ceram. Int. 2025, 51, 59120–59129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akrami, S.; Edalati, P.; Fuji, M.; Edalati, K. High-Entropy Ceramics: Review of Principles, Production and Applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2021, 146, 100644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qadir, D.; Sharif, R.; Nasir, R.; Awad, A.; Mannan, H.A. A Review on Coatings through Thermal Spraying. Chem. Pap. 2024, 78, 71–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Satyavathi Yedida, V.V.; Vasudev, H. A Review on the Development of Thermal Barrier Coatings by Using Thermal Spray Techniques. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 50, 1458–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, W.; Bai, Y. Review of Suspension and Solution Precursor Plasma Sprayed Thermal Barrier Coatings. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 14299–14312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badry, F.; Ahmed, K. A New Model for the Effective Thermal Conductivity of Polycrystalline Solids. AIP Adv. 2020, 10, 105021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, D.S.; Puech, F.; Nait-Ali, B.; Alzina, A.; Honda, S. Grain Boundary Thermal Resistance and Finite Grain Size Effects for Heat Conduction through Porous Polycrystalline Alumina. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2018, 121, 1273–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vitiello, D.; Kieliba, I.; Honda, S.; Nait-Ali, B.; Tessier-Doyen, N.; Marschall, H.U.; Smith, D.S. Analysis of Microstructural Effects on the Thermal Conductivity of Alumina-Spinel Refractories Compared to Alumina Ceramics. Ceramics 2026, 9, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Ma, Y.; Xue, Z.; Yang, Y.; Chen, J.; Guo, H. Effect of Y Doping on Microstructure and Thermophysical Properties of Yttria Stabilized Hafnia Ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 18213–18221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, K.; Wang, Q.; Shao, G.; Zhao, X.; Wang, Y. Multicomponent High-Entropy Zirconates with Comprehensive Properties for Advanced Thermal Barrier Coating. Scr. Mater. 2020, 178, 382–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, F.; Zhou, L.; Liu, J.-X.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, G.-J. High-Entropy Pyrochlores with Low Thermal Conductivity for Thermal Barrier Coating Materials. J. Adv. Ceram. 2019, 8, 576–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Xie, M.; Wang, Z.; Song, X.; Mu, R.; Gao, J.; Bao, J.; Zhou, F.; Pan, W. Unveiling the Underlying Mechanism of Unusual Thermal Conductivity Behavior in Multicomponent High-Entropy (La0.2Gd0.2Y0.2Yb0.2Er0.2)2(Zr1-xCex)2O7 Ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 958, 170471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cong, L.; Li, W.; Wang, J.; Gu, S.; Zhang, S. High-Entropy (Y0.2Gd0.2Dy0.2Er0.2Yb0.2)2Hf2O7 Ceramic: A Promising Thermal Barrier Coating Material. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 101, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sang, W.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Chen, X.; Xie, W.; Hou, R.; Ma, H.; Li, S.; Wang, N.; et al. Novel (Sm0.2Lu0.2Yb0.2Y0.2Dy0.2)3TaO7 High-Entropy Ceramic for Thermal Barrier Coatings. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 9052–9059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, B.; Fang, M.H.; Huang, Z.H.; Liu, Y.G.; Peng, P.; Zhang, J. Mechanical and Thermal Properties of LaMgAl11O19. Mater. Res. Bull. 2010, 45, 1506–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shishkin, R.A.; Reznitskikh, O.G.; Suntsov, A.Y.; Kozhevnikov, V.L. Properties of SrCe0.95M0.05O3 (M = La, Pr, Y, Sn) Thermal Barrier Materials. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 27003–27010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shishkin, R.A. Structure and Thermal Properties of SrCe1-xSnxO3 (X = 0.1…0.5) as a Promising Thermal Barrier Coating. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 31539–31548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, G.; Jiang, D.; Chen, H.; Yang, G.; Nian, H.; Liu, B. High-temperature Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Ca1−x SrxZrO3 Solid Solutions. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 103, 1992–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shishkin, R.A.; Tyutyunnik, A.P.; Bykov, V.A.; Yurev, I.O. Structure and Thermal Properties of High-Entropy Perovskites SrNi0.2Nb0.2W0.2Ti0.2M0.2O3, Where M = Fe, Mn. J. Alloys Compd. 2025, 1022, 179797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, R.; Chatterjee, S.; Ranjan, M.; Bhattacharya, T.; Mukherjee, S.; Jana, S.S.; Dwivedi, A.; Maiti, T. High-Entropy Perovskites: An Emergent Class of Oxide Thermoelectrics with Ultralow Thermal Conductivity. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 17022–17032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binnewies, M.; Milke, E. Thermochemical Data of Elements and Compounds, 1st ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Mostafa, A.T.M.G.; Eakman, J.M.; Montoya, M.M.; Yarbro, S.L. Prediction of Heat Capacities of Solid Inorganic Salts from Group Contributions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leitner, J.; Voňka, P.; Sedmidubský, D.; Svoboda, P. Application of Neumann–Kopp Rule for the Estimation of Heat Capacity of Mixed Oxides. Thermochim. Acta 2010, 497, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schick, M.; Watson, A.; To Baben, M.; Hack, K. A Modified Neumann–Kopp Treatment of the Heat Capacity of Stoichiometric Phases for Use in Computational Thermodynamics. J. Phase Equilibria Diffus. 2019, 40, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joubert, J.-M.; Kaplan, B.; Selleby, M. The Specific Heat of Al-Based Compounds, Evaluation of the Neumann-Kopp Rule and Proposal for a Modified Neumann-Kopp Rule. Calphad 2023, 81, 102562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, X.; Fan, H.; Zhou, Y. The Lattice Thermal Conductivity of Hafnia: The Influence of High-Order Scatterings and Phonon Coherence. J. Appl. Phys. 2024, 135, 125102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarkov, D.A.; Borik, M.A.; Korableva, G.M.; Kulebyakin, A.V.; Lomonova, E.E.; Milovich, F.O.; Myzina, V.A.; Popov, P.A.; Tabachkova, N.Y. Thermal Conductivity of Single Crystals Zirconia Stabilized by Scandium, Yttrium, Gadolinium, and Ytterbium Oxides. Mod. Electron. Mater. 2022, 8, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, F.; Fan, Q.B.; Wang, F.C.; Zhang, H.L. Perturbation Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Thermal Conductivity of Zirconia. Key Eng. Mater. 2008, 368–372, 1325–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popov, V.V.; Menushenkov, A.P.; Yaroslavtsev, A.A.; Zubavichus, Y.V.; Gaynanov, B.R.; Yastrebtsev, A.A.; Leshchev, D.S.; Chernikov, R.V. Fluorite-Pyrochlore Phase Transition in Nanostructured Ln2Hf2O7 (Ln = La-Lu). J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 689, 669–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swartz, E.T.; Pohl, R.O. Thermal Boundary Resistance. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1989, 61, 605–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Chu, K.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, W.; Liu, B. Discovery of Orthorhombic Perovskite Oxides with Low Thermal Conductivity by First-Principles Calculations. J. Adv. Ceram. 2022, 11, 1596–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]











| Formula | Compound | Synthesis | Sintering | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AO2 | YSH, YSZ | SSR 1600 °C 5 h | CP 200 MPa 1600 °C 5 h | [24] |
| A2B2O7 | RE2Zr2O7 | Co-precipitation 1600 °C | HP 50 MPa 1500 0.5 h | [8] |
| RE2Zr2O7 | Co-precipitation 600 °C 2h | SPS 50 MPa 1200 °C 30 min 1700 °C 30 s | [25] | |
| RE2Zr2O7 | Reaction sintering | CIP 200 MPa 1500 °C 3 h | [26] | |
| RE2(Zr1−xCex)2O7 | Reaction sintering | CIP 200 MPa 1600 °C 6 h | [27] | |
| RE2Ce2O7 | Reaction sintering | CIP 200 MPa 1600 °C 2 h | [10] | |
| RE2Hf2O7 | SCS 1200 °C 2 h | CIP 300 MPa 1600 °C 10 h | [28] | |
| ABO4 | RETaO4 | Reaction sintering SPS 70 MPa 1500 °C 15 min | Carbon removal 1500 °C 2 h | [11] |
| RENbO4 | SSR 1250 °C 10 h | CIP 220 MPa 1600 °C 10 h | [12] | |
| REPO4 | Co-precipitation 900 °C 4 h | CP 300 MPa 1600 °C 10 h | [16] | |
| A3BO7 | RE3NbO7 | SSR 1250 °C 2.5 h | CP 200 MPa 1600 °C 5 h | [9] |
| RE3TaO7 | Sol–gel 1000 °C 2 h | CP 12 MPa 1600 °C 10 h | [29] | |
| A2BO5 | Y2SiO5 | SSR 1500 °C 2 h | CIP 260 MPa 1500 1 h | [13] |
| REAB11O19 | LaMgAl11O19 | SSR 1300 °C 4 h | CIP 270 MPa 1700 °C 6 h | [30] |
| ABO3 | SrCe0.95M0.05O3 | SSR 900 °C 10 h | CP 1200 °C 12 h | [31] |
| SrCe1−xSnxO3 | SSR 1000 °C 10 h | CP 1600 °C 12 h | [32] | |
| Ca1−xSrxZrO3 | SSR 1350 °C 4 h | CIP 180 MPa 1750 °C 5 h | [33] | |
| SrMO3 | SSR 1000 °C 12 h | CP 1600 °C 12 h | [34] | |
| SrMO3 | SSR 1223 °C 10 h | CP 1277 °C 10 h | [35] |
| Compound | NK Error in Cp (%) | Mean Deviation (NK) (%) | M Error in Cp (%) | Mean Deviation (M) (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SrCeO3 | 1.90 | 0.65 | 3.20 | 1.05 |
| SrCe0.95Y0.05O3 | 8.69 | 0.84 | 3.33 | 1.63 |
| SrCe0.95La0.05O3 | 5.44 | 0.42 | 2.56 | 1.3 |
| SrCe0.95Pr0.05O3 | 4.09 | 0.88 | 3.16 | 1.59 |
| SrCe0.95Sn0.05O3 | 4.95 | 0.67 | 3.16 | 1.54 |
| SrCe0.9Sn0.1O3 | 6.49 | 1.90 | 4.40 | 2.42 |
| SrCe0.85Sn0.15O3 | 5.57 | 1.37 | 3.52 | 1.80 |
| SrCe0.8Sn0.2O3 | 7.85 | 1.21 | 5.16 | 2.88 |
| SrCe0.7Sn0.3O3 | 6.95 | 2.71 | 4.59 | 2.54 |
| SrCe0.6Sn0.4O3 | 10.94 | 2.58 | 6.68 | 4.29 |
| SrCe0.5Sn0.5O3 | 11.99 | 1.82 | 7.21 | 4.14 |
| SrNi0.2Nb0.2W0.2Ti0.2Fe0.2O3 | 19.72 | 1.92 | 12.35 | 3.71 |
| SrNi0.2Nb0.2W0.2Ti0.2Mn0.2O3 | 14.96 | 2.87 | 8.93 | 3.99 |
| Average | 8.43 | 1.53 | 5.25 | 2.53 |
| Composition | kgrain, W·m−1·K−1 | keff at 300 K, W·m−1·K−1 | Rgb, 10−6 m2 K W−1 | Grain Size, µm | ρ, % | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YSZ | 47.2–64.3 | 3.0 | 0.12 | 1.4 | 96.1 | 0.90 |
| HfO2 | 51.8 | 9.0 | 0.29 | 1.2 | 94.0 | 0.70 |
| YSH4 | 18.7 | 5.6 | 0.34 | 2.2 | 96.0 | 0.95 |
| YSH8 | 20.8 | 4.2 | 0.47 | 2.3 | 94.2 | 0.96 |
| YSH12 | 34.0 | 2.9 | 0.79 | 2.5 | 96.5 | 0.94 |
| Composition | kgrain, W·m−1·K−1 | keff at 300 K, W·m−1·K−1 | Rgb, 10−6 m2 K W−1 | Grain Size, µm | ρ, % | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| La2Zr2O7 | 11.1 | 3.1 | - | 97.3 | 0.92 | |
| Gd2Zr2O7 | 16.2 | 1.9 | 1.19 | 2.7 | 96.0 | 0.92 |
| Nd2Zr2O7 | 16.3 | 2.1 | 94.0 | 0.92 | ||
| Sm2Zr2O7 | 14.0 | 1.9 | 98.0 | 0.89 | ||
| Lu2Zr2O7 | 16.2 | 2.2 | 0.75 | |||
| (Sm1/3Eu1/3Dy1/3)2Zr2O7 | 17.5 | 2.0 | 2.05 | 4.0 | 0.99 | |
| (Sm0.2Eu0.2Tb0.2Dy0.2Lu0.2)2Zr2O7 | 7.1 | 1.9 | 2.40 | 4.0 | 98.9 | 0.96 |
| (La0.2Nd0.2Sm0.2Eu0.2Gd0.2)2Zr2O7 | 56.4 | 1.0 | 0.45 | 0.8 | 71.1 | 0.92 |
| (La0.2Gd0.2Y0.2Yb0.2Er0.2)2Zr2O7 | 21.5 | 1.17 | 2.0 | 98.8 | 0.79 | |
| (La0.2Gd0.2Y0.2Yb0.2Er0.2)2(Zr0.9Ce0.1)2O7 | 19.6 | 1.80 | 3.3 | 98.2 | 0.89 | |
| (La0.2Gd0.2Y0.2Yb0.2Er0.2)2(Zr0.8Ce0.2)2O7 | 14.5 | 2.14 | 4.2 | 98.6 | 0.87 | |
| (La0.2Gd0.2Y0.2Yb0.2Er0.2)2(Zr0.7Ce0.3)2O7 | 15.6 | 2.39 | 4.7 | 98.7 | 0.91 | |
| (La0.2Gd0.2Y0.2Yb0.2Er0.2)2(Zr0.6Ce0.4)2O7 | 14.7 | 2.43 | 5.0 | 98.4 | 0.96 | |
| (La0.2Gd0.2Y0.2Yb0.2Er0.2)2ZrCeO7 | 13.5 | 2.53 | 5.5 | 98.5 | 0.97 | |
| Sm2Ce2O7 | 12.0 | 2.9 | 2.37 | 9.4 | 98.2 | 0.97 |
| Dy2Ce2O7 | 10.9 | 2.6 | 0.97 | 4.3 | 98.8 | 0.99 |
| (Sm0.2Eu0.2Tb0.2Dy0.2Lu0.2)2Ce2O7 | 9.0 | 2.1 | 1.09 | 2.8 | 88.0 | 0.97 |
| (Sm0.2Eu0.2Tb0.2Dy0.2Lu0.2)2CeZrO7 | 12.7 | 1.9 | 5.82 | 12.1 | 97.0 | 0.93 |
| (Y0.2Gd0.2Dy0.2Er0.2Yb0.2)2Hf2O7 | 10.8 | 0.9 | 0.57 | 0.6 | 74.7 | 0.97 |
| Composition | kgrain, W·m−1·K−1 | keff at 300 K, W·m−1·K−1 | Rgb, 10−6 m2 K W−1 | Grain Size, µm | ρ, % | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gd3NbO7 | 29.0 | 1.6 | - | 0.93 | ||
| La3NbO7 | 17.0 | 1.5 | - | 0.87 | ||
| Sm3TaO7 | 18.9 | 1.9 | - | 0.85 | ||
| (Sm0.2Dy0.2Y0.2Yb0.2Lu0.2)3TaO7 | 42.1 | 1.2 | 1.64 | 2.0 | 95.7 | 0.86 |
| Composition | kgrain, W·m−1·K−1 | keff at 300 K, W·m−1·K−1 | Rgb, 10−6 m2 K W−1 | Grain Size, µm | ρ, % | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GdTaO4 | 10.0 | 3.8 | 1.34 | 8.4 | 96.0 | 0.96 |
| SmTaO4 | 8.1 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 7.6 | 94.6 | 0.98 |
| DyTaO4 | 6.2 | 2.0 | 1.97 | 5.7 | 97.9 | 0.89 |
| ErNbO4 | 17.0 | 3.4 | 0.77 | 2.7 | 99.5 | 0.85 |
| DyNbO4 | 13.3 | 3.3 | 0.69 | 2.9 | 99.5 | 0.97 |
| NdNbO4 | 18.1 | 3.2 | 1.03 | 3.5 | 99.7 | 0.97 |
| YbNbO4 | 10.8 | 3.1 | 0.61 | 2.6 | 99.2 | 0.96 |
| GdNbO4 | 8.8 | 2.8 | 0.51 | 2.0 | 98.9 | 0.99 |
| SmNbO4 | 13.1 | 2.5 | 1.75 | 5.1 | 99.5 | 0.95 |
| (La0.2Sm0.2Gd0.2Dy0.2Nd0.2)PO4 | 11.5 | 2.6 | 2.33 | 7.3 | 93.3 | 0.95 |
| (La0.2Sm0.2Gd0.2Dy0.2Ho0.2)PO4 | 8.4 | 2.4 | 3.10 | 9.6 | 91.5 | 0.92 |
| (La0.2Sm0.2Gd0.2Dy0.2Yb0.2)PO4 | 7.0 | 2.3 | 1.60 | 4.9 | 87.5 | 0.93 |
| LaMgAl11O19 | 42.1 | 1.6 | 0.78 | 4.8 | 95.9 | 0.90 |
| Y2Si2O5 | 17.0 | 3.2 | 2.65 | 2.8 | 98.0 | 0.89 |
| Composition | kgrain, W·m−1·K−1 | keff at 300 K, W·m−1·K−1 | Rgb, 10−6 m2 K W−1 | Grain Size, µm | ρ, % | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SrCeO3 | 5.7 | 1.75 | 2.09 | 5.92 | 84.7 | 0.92 |
| SrCe0.95La0.05O3 | 12.4 | 1.35 | 4.35 | 8.43 | 82.7 | 0.8 |
| SrCe0.95Pr0.05O3 | 4.66 | 1.5 | 2.26 | 7.62 | 85.0 | 0.91 |
| SrCe0.95Sn0.05O3 | 12.9 | 1.45 | 2.74 | 5.48 | 88.7 | 0.95 |
| SrCe0.9Sn0.1O3 | 27.9 | 1.41 | 7.74 | 10.53 | 86.9 | 0.73 |
| SrCe0.85Sn0.15O3 | 18.5 | 1.36 | 5.80 | 7.95 | 84.1 | 0.7 |
| SrCe0.8Sn0.2O3 | 15.5 | 1.08 | 5.87 | 7.18 | 73.8 | 0.88 |
| SrCe0.7Sn0.3O3 | 16.7 | 0.64 | 4.78 | 5.79 | 74.5 | 0.85 |
| SrCe0.6Sn0.4O3 | 24.8 | 0.65 | 5.82 | 6.29 | 69.7 | 0.77 |
| SrCe0.5Sn0.5O3 | 25.8 | 1.08 | 7.27 | 8.01 | 67.5 | 0.77 |
| Ca1−xSrxZrO3 | 10.6 | 3.04 | 1.83 | 7.5 | 93.1 | 0.99 |
| SrNi0.2Nb0.2W0.2Ti0.2Mn0.2O3 | 22.2 | 0.89 | 6.77 | 5.98 | 66.0 | 0.93 |
| SrNi0.2Nb0.2W0.2Ti0.2Fe0.2O3 | 12.7 | 0.93 | 2.35 | 2.22 | 65.0 | 0.75 |
| SrTi0.2Fe0.2Mo0.2Nb0.2Cr0.2O3 | 7.4 | 1.96 | 0.29 | 0.85 | 0.96 |
| Oxide Class | kgrain, W·m−1·K−1 | Rgb, 10−6 m2·K·W−1 | Principal Advantages | Principal Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pyrochlore/fluorite A2B2O7 | 7–22 | 0.45–5.82 | Very low kgrain, high CMAS resistance | Low CTE, tendency to order |
| Defective fluoriteA3BO7 | 17–42 | 1.64 | Excellent phase stability | Relatively high kgrain |
| Fergusonite ABO4 | 6–18 | 0.51–1.97 | Lowest kgrain values | Low CTE |
| Monazite REPO4 | 7–11.5 | 1.60–3.10 | High Rgb | Phosphorus sublimation, low CTE |
| Perovskite ABO3 | 4.7–27.9 | 0.29–7.74 | Optimal balance of kgrain and Rgb, tunable CTE | Possible electronic conduction at high doping |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Shishkin, R.A. Grain Versus Grain-Boundary Contributions to Thermal Conductivity in Prospective Oxide Ceramics for Next-Generation Thermal Barrier Coatings. Ceramics 2026, 9, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics9050052
Shishkin RA. Grain Versus Grain-Boundary Contributions to Thermal Conductivity in Prospective Oxide Ceramics for Next-Generation Thermal Barrier Coatings. Ceramics. 2026; 9(5):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics9050052
Chicago/Turabian StyleShishkin, Roman Aleksandrovich. 2026. "Grain Versus Grain-Boundary Contributions to Thermal Conductivity in Prospective Oxide Ceramics for Next-Generation Thermal Barrier Coatings" Ceramics 9, no. 5: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics9050052
APA StyleShishkin, R. A. (2026). Grain Versus Grain-Boundary Contributions to Thermal Conductivity in Prospective Oxide Ceramics for Next-Generation Thermal Barrier Coatings. Ceramics, 9(5), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics9050052

