Review Reports
- Luca Leonardi†,‡,
- Lucia Lo Bello*,†,‡ and
- Gaetano Patti†,‡
Reviewer 1: Vesna Todorčević Reviewer 2: Gongxing Wu Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
see the report
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
The response is in the attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
1. The language correctness is very important while publishing in journals. Authors need to make a professional proofing in Abstract. For the first occurrence of this abbreviation “Deadline-ST” it needs to list the full name.
2. In the " Abstract.", the “OMNeT++” not indication of its meaning.
3. In Introduction and motivation, the authors should clearly explain why this research is important and progress on this field should be given in more details.
4. In line 39, the “LAN” does not know what is indicated.
5. In line 66, the “ADAS” does not explain its meaning in this paper.
6. In line 92, the “Deadline-ST”, ST is not specified in this paper.
7. In line 130, the “Asynchronous Traffic Shaping” followed by less (ATS).
8. In line 133, for the first occurrence of this abbreviation “SMT” it needs to list the full name.
9. In line 185, for the first occurrence of these abbreviations “VLAN and MAC” it needs to list the full name.
10. In line 219, the Q does not know the meaning of the expression in this paper.
11. In line 229, the N does not know the meaning of the expression in this paper.
12. Formulas (1) and (2) “N Q and u” are not sure what they mean in this article.
13. Formulas (3) “τb” is not sure what it means in this paper.
14. In lines 309 and 310 for the first occurrence of these abbreviations “NeSTiNg and INET” it needs to list the full name.
15. The radars sensor did not list in " Table 1. Flow parameters.", it is an important device.
16. In lines 322 and 323 for the first occurrence of these abbreviations “LiDARs and ECU” it needs to list the full name.
17. In line 339 the “TSN-ST”, needs to list the full name.
18. In line 348 the “Credit-Based Shaping” followed by less (CBS).
19. In line 403 the “COTS” , needs to list the full name.
Author Response
The response is in the attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
The following revisions are required.
1. In literature review, add 3 to five more relevant and latest techniques.
2. Add Comparison table at the end of section 2 and compare with at least 10 to 12 techniques with appropriate parameters.
3. Please make sure your paper has necessary language proof-reading.
Author Response
The response is in the attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
The author made a better revision based on the last revision. It is hoped that the author will carefully check the whole manuscript to eliminate grammatical errors and ambiguities.
Author Response
We asked a professional proofreading service to check our paper.
The revised paper now reflects the corrections made by them.