Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Anomalous Interfacial Structuring of a Non-Halogenated Ionic Liquid: Effect of Substrate and Temperature
Previous Article in Journal
An Efficient Bioemulsifier-Producing Bacillus subtilis UCP 0146 Isolated from Mangrove Sediments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Amplitude on the Surface Dilational Visco-Elasticity of Protein Solutions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Colloids and Interfaces
Volume 2
Issue 4
10.3390/colloids2040059
colloids-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Synthesis and Properties of SBA-15 Modified with Non-Noble Metals

by
Marek Kosmulski
*,
Edward Mączka
and
Leszek Ruchomski
Laboratory of Electrochemistry, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 38, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Colloids Interfaces 2018, 2(4), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids2040059
Submission received: 2 October 2018 / Revised: 5 November 2018 / Accepted: 12 November 2018 / Published: 14 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from the 16th Conference of the International Association of Colloid and Interface Scientists (IACIS 2018))
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Modification of SBA-15 with non-noble metal leads to functional materials, which can be applied as gas sensors, adsorbents, and catalysts of various reactions. The new materials contain up to four various metals, which are deposited consecutively or simultaneously at various concentrations ranging from a fraction of 1% to an amount that is comparable with the mass of silica-support. These materials contain metals at various oxidation levels, usually as oxides, which occur in crystalline form (a typical crystallite size of about 10 nm matches the width of the SBA-15 channels), but in a few other materials, crystalline metal compounds have not been detected. Many researchers have provided detailed physico- chemical characteristics of SBA-15 modified with non-noble metals by the means of various microscopic and spectroscopic techniques.
Keywords:
BET; XRD; TEM; FTIR; TGA; Raman

1. Introduction

This present review is devoted exclusively to non-noble metal-SBA-15 composites. These materials inherit periodic structures, high specific surface areas, and high thermal stabilities (up to about 700 °C) after SBA-15, and they show a wide variety of chemical properties that are inherited after the metallic components. Composites noble metal-SBA-15 were extensively studied, especially in the context of their catalytic properties. The noble metals were deposited on silica-only SBA-15 [1] or on non-noble metal-SBA-15 composites [2,3], but materials containing noble metals are outside the scope of the present review. There are specific problems in non-noble metal-SBA-15 composites, which need different approaches to noble metal-SBA-15 composites. For example, noble metals occur in an elementary (metallic) form, while non-noble metals occur in various chemical forms, which differ in the degree of oxidation of the metal (including but not limited to elementary metal), the degree of hydration, etc. Moreover on top of metal, oxygen, and hydrogen, composites with non-noble metals may contain other elements. Particular studies reported in the literature differ in many aspects, including the type of metal(s), the fraction of metal(s), the reaction being catalyzed, the availability of physico-chemical data obtained by different methods, etc. It is practically impossible to extract the effect of one variable from such a set of literature data. Impregnation with metal precursors often leads to a mixture of bulk metal oxides and silica, rather than to a real composite material. This is a real challenge in the synthesis of metal-SBA-15 composites, and various methods (e.g., addition of complexing agents) were used to avoid this problem.
The catalytic properties of SBA-15-metal composites were discussed (among many other materials) in several reviews. The catalysts containing non-noble metals, and various porous silicas (including SBA-15) are often considered as one class of materials. For example, Singh et al. [4] reviewed catalysts for reforming techniques. They especially emphasized the porous network of SBA-15 support as a factor limiting the growth of crystals of supported metal compounds. Very often, the catalysts containing noble and non-noble metals are considered as one class of materials [5]. Usman et al. [6] reviewed catalysts of the dry reforming of methane, and discussed Ni- SBA-15 composites, among many other catalysts (chiefly Ni, Rh, and Pt supported on various oxides), and their study makes it possible to assess the influence of the support (SBA-15) on the catalytic activity, and to compare different supports. Ziolek and Sobczak [7] reviewed Nb-modified ordered silicas (including SBA-15) as supports of Cu, Ag, Au, and Pt, provided their physico-chemical characterization (XRD, X-rays diffraction, UV, ultraviolet-vis spectroscopy, H2-TPR, temperature-programmed desorption, FTIR, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, EPR, electron paramagnetic resonance), and discussed the role of the support in the catalytic activities of their catalysts (especially in oxidation of methanol). Debecker et al. [8] reviewed mesoporous mixed oxide catalysts, and they compared Ti-modified SBA-15 with several other catalysts. Akbari el al. [9] reviewed catalysts of oxidation reactions, and discussed Ni-, Cu-, Ga-, In-, W-, and Fe-SBA-15 composites among many other catalysts (metal oxides and composites thereof).
On top of catalysis, several other potential applications of non-noble metal-SBA-15 composites have been considered. Z1 = 2 et al. [10] summarized recent studies demonstrating the application of W-modified, Pd- and Sn-, Cr- and W-, and Ag- and Sn-modified SBA-15 (among other materials) as gas sensors (a broad range of target gases). Yang [11] applied Bi-modified SBA-15 as a material for the capture of iodine (especially of I-129) and its stable storage. A short section in this review is devoted to the adsorption properties of metal-modified SBA-15, but most of the presented results refer to their catalytic properties.

2. Materials and Methods

The chemical composition of the composites, preparation methods, and the chemical forms of the metals in the composites reported in the recent literature [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68] are summarized in Table S1 (supplementary material). Each composite was given a unique code that is used in further discussions. The composites are ordered by their codes in the table. Our codes consist of the names of metallic elements and numbers, and they differ from the codes used for the same composites in previous publications. The list of the chemical elements used in the code does not fully describe the chemical composition of the composite, and only up to two elements are indicated in the codes, while certain composites in Table S1 contain three or even four metallic elements. An exhaustive list of metallic elements, in particular composites, is reported in the second column of Table S1. Most studies of SBA-15 metal composites report their quantitative compositions, but different authors express metal concentrations by different methods (mass ratio, molar ratio, etc.) In this study, we used a unified approach, and all concentrations were expressed in terms of Si-to-metal atomic (molar) ratios. The compositions reported in the original publications were re-calculated when necessary. These concentrations are reported in the third column of Table S1, and large numbers correspond to low metal concentrations. The preparation of the composites is briefly described in the fifth column. We only gave a short description: “one pot” for metals added in the course of synthesis of SBA-15, etc., and the metal precursor was specified. Long descriptions were avoided, and more details that can be found in the original literature cited in the last column are in the references therein. Empty cells denote that certain information was not applicable or not reported.
Most composites used as catalysts were obtained by the impregnation of the original SBA-15 with aqueous solutions of simple inorganic salts of certain metal(s), followed by calcination, and different metal concentrations in the composite were achieved by the adjustment of metal concentration in solution. A few composites were obtained by impregnation with solutions in non-aqueous solvents, or in the presence of complexing agents in solution. One-pot syntheses and CVD were far less popular than impregnation.
Composites based upon SBA-15 containing Ni (with or without other metals) were studied in recent publications more often than in composites containing other non-noble metals, followed by composites containing Co or Ce (with or without other metals), while composites without Ni, Co, or Ce were less popular. There was an obvious correlation between the catalytic properties of pure oxides of Ni, Co, and Ce, and catalytic properties of composites containing these oxides. The Si:metal atomic ratio in most catalysts was in the range of 5–30 in monometallic catalysts. In the catalysts containing more than one metal, the second (less abundant) metallic component was often added at very low concentrations (Si:metal atomic ratio > 100). Metals occurred in the form of oxides at various degrees of oxidation in most composites. Metallic Ni (pure or as an alloy with another metal) was found in a few composites. Spinel-type or perovskite-type mixed oxides were reported in a few composites. The formation of crystalline silicates was only observed in a few metal-SBA-15 composites containing Mg.
The methods used for the characterization of the composites (ordered by their codes), and the results obtained by nitrogen adsorption at its boiling point, and by XRD, are summarized in Table S2. The original acronyms used by the authors of cited papers are reported in Table S2, and sometimes one method is given various acronyms. The explanation of the codes of composites (detailed composition) can be found in Table S1. Most studies of SBA-15-metal composites report their specific surface areas, which are presented in the third column of Table S2. The SSA, specific surface area of original SBA-15 is given in the second column when available and applicable (e.g., there is no “original SBA-15” for one-pot synthesis). All SSA are rounded to 1 m2/g. The SSA is crucial as the property defining the ability of the composite to adsorb gaseous compounds. The size of crystallites and structures from XRD are reported in the fourth column. Several publications report the size of crystals of the metal compound from TEM, transmission electron microscopy (together with or instead of the size from XRD), but the size from microscopy is not reported in Table S2. In a few materials, the sizes from XRD and from TEM match, but in a few other composites, they do not. The size of the crystals has been emphasized as the parameter defining the catalytic activity of the composite. The fifth column of Table S2 shows a great variety of techniques other than SSA, and XRD. Actually, most abbreviations used in this review and summarized in the abbreviation list refer to various analytical techniques. Only a limited number of techniques were used in particular studies, and this can be explained by the limited availability of expensive equipment. Table S2 is a good illustration of two contradictory approaches used in catalytic studies. Several scientists prefer to experimentally study the catalytic activity of a series of catalysts in the reaction of interest first, and then follow this with physico-chemical characterization of the most promising specimens. The opposite approach is to provide detailed physico-chemical characterization of all specimens first, and then select promising specimens based on that characterization.
Table S2 shows that three to five different techniques (including SSA and XRD) were used in most studies to characterize particular composites. It should be emphasized that the term SBA-15 refers to a broad class of materials having a SSA in the range of 600–900 m2/g, and they also differ in their small-angle XRD patterns. Most composites had lower SSAs than the original SSA-15, but their SSAs were still very high (several hundred m2/g). A few composites showed exceptional behaviors. In Ce1, Ce3, Ce5, Ce11, Ce12, Ce13, and Ce15, the SSA was substantially higher than that of the original silica. These materials contained Ce as the only metallic component at very different concentrations (Si:Ce atomic ratios from 8 to 1000). In contrast La/Ni1, La/Ni2, and La/Ni3, had specific surface areas below 100 m2/g, that is, lower by an order of magnitude than the original silica. The sizes of the crystallites reported in the fourth column are often about 10 nm, and they match the diameters of the channels in the hexagonal network of SBA-15. This result confirms that SBA-15 confines the size of the crystals to the width of its channels.

3. Results and Discussion

In spite of their high SSAs, very few studies demonstrated possible application of non-noble metal-SBA-15 composites as adsorbents. A few examples are presented in Table 1.
Apparently, the ability of Ni-SBA-15 to adsorb hydrogen was the only adsorption property of the non-noble metal-SBA-15 composites, which has attracted a substantial amount of attention of scientists over the recent few years. This process was studied over a wide range of temperatures, ranging from the boiling point of nitrogen to the limit of thermal stability of SBA-15.
Several examples of catalytic activity of SBA-15-metal composites are presented in Table 2. A few authors studied the catalytic activity of the original SBA-15 (no metal added) as a reference. Silica-only SBA-15 are presented in the upper part of Table 2 with codes None (none is for no metal added). The other materials are ordered by their codes, as in the other tables. Different authors have used different research strategies:
  • a series of catalysts used to study one reaction at the same conditions,
  • one catalyst used to study one reaction at various conditions (temperature, time of equilibration),
  • one catalyst used to study multiple reactions,
and combinations thereof. The results are also presented in different formats in the original publications. In Table 2, we limited ourselves to the presentation of a few selected details. The reaction is briefly described in the second column, and the temperature t is given in the third column. In the studies performed at various temperatures with the same catalysts, the results obtained at each temperature are presented as a separate entry in the table. In parallel reactions (the same substrates give different products), two different approaches appear in the literature. In several papers, the overall conversion % is reported, followed by the selectivities for particular products (which add up to 100%). In other publications, the conversion percentages to certain products are reported, which may but not necessarily add up to 100%. In Table 2, we used the convention used by the authors of particular original papers. In the studies with various equilibration times, the conversion percentage in the fourth column is followed by the equilibration time in parentheses.
A broad variety of chemical reactions have been studied, as shown in the second column of Table 2. Many studies were performed at high temperatures (>700 °C), which are higher than the limit of long-term thermal stability for SBA-15. Although the presence of metallic elements may improve the thermal stability of SBA-15, the degradation of the catalyst and the change of its chemical and physical properties in the course of the catalytic reactions performed at >700 °C is very likely. Therefore, processes occurring at lower temperatures are more promising in the view of possible practical applications. Unfortunately, the temperature is critical for a substantial conversion rate in many reactions. For example, in the conversion of carbon dioxide to carbon oxide and hydrogen catalyzed by Zr/Ce2, the increase in the temperature from 620 to 750 °C improved the conversion rate from 58% to 100%. The problem is that the later temperature rise leads to degradation of the catalyst. Thus, we have a difficult choice between a high conversion rate and a long catalyst lifetime. This problem occurs in many other examples presented in Table 2; e.g., with the conversion of methane to hydrogen as catalyzed by Ni63 and Ni64. We would also like to emphasize that the results of thermal analysis may be misleading in the assessment of long-term thermal stability. Many publications report the results of fast scans (10 K/min or more), which only reflect short-term stability, and they substantially overrate the long-term thermal stability. Fortunately many reactions, e.g., of syngas to methane catalyzed by Ni20–Ni22, show a 100% or an almost 100% conversion at temperatures as low as 400 °C, when the SBA-15 support is stable against thermal degradation.
The studies of the effect of the preparation method on the catalytic activity are rare. Two catalysts containing the same amount of Ca, and with very similar specific surface areas, obtained by the one-pot route on the one hand, and by wet impregnation on the other were studied, and the former was superior as a catalyst of reaction of diphenyl carbonate with isosorbide to poly(isosorbide carbonate) at 240 °C [18]. Three series of catalysts containing the same amounts of Co and Mo obtained by wet impregnation with different solutions were studied, and the materials obtained by impregnation with solutions containing EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid were superior as catalysts of reaction of hydrodesulfurization of dibenzothiophene at 300 °C, as compared with materials obtained by impregnation with solutions containing citrate or without complexing agents [37]. All catalysts studied in [37] had similar specific surface areas, and they contained β-CoMoO4. Four catalysts containing similar amounts of Cu and Ni, obtained by wet impregnation on the one hand, and by precipitation with carbonate or with urea on the other, were studied as catalysts of conversion of cinnamaldehyde to hydrocinnamyl alcohol at 130 °C and of oxidation of carbon oxide to carbon dioxide at 160 °C [40]. The catalyst obtained by precipitation with urea was superior to other catalysts in the oxidation of carbon oxide, and the catalyst obtained by precipitation with carbonate was more selective than other catalysts in the conversion of cinnamaldehyde to hydrocinnamyl alcohol. Interestingly enough, the efficient catalysts obtained by precipitation had lower SSA than less-efficient catalysts obtained by impregnation [40]. Three catalysts containing similar amounts of Ni, obtained by different methods were studied as catalysts of conversion of carbon dioxide to carbon oxide and hydrogen at 500 and 600 °C, and of the conversion of methane to hydrogen at 500 and 700 °C [46]. The catalyst obtained in mixed suspension with urea and ascorbic acid was more efficient than other catalysts in both reactions. Again, the most efficient catalysts had lower SSA than the less efficient catalysts [46]. Four catalysts containing the same amount of Ni, obtained by wet impregnation in the presence and absence of different complexing agents were studied as catalysts of conversion of CH4 to H2 and of the conversion of CO2 to CO, both reactions at 600 and 800 °C [56]. The catalyst were equally efficient at 800 °C, and the catalyst obtained in absence of complexing agents was less efficient than catalysts obtained in the presence of complexing agents at 600 °C, although the effect was not very significant. Five series of catalysts containing the same amounts of Ni obtained by wet impregnation in the presence and absence of EDTA were studied as catalysts of conversion of naphthalene to tetralin on the one hand, and to cis-decalin on the other, at 300 °C [57]. Tetralin was the main product with catalysts synthesized in absence of complexing agents, especially with materials with low Ni concentration, and cis-decalin was the main product, with catalysts synthesized in the presence of EDTA, especially with materials with high Ni concentration. The catalysts synthesized in the presence of EDTA had lower specific surface areas than their counterparts containing the same amount of Ni, but synthesized in absence of complexing agents. Three catalysts containing the same amounts of Ni and Ce, obtained by wet impregnation at different conditions (ultrasounds, reflux) were studied as catalysts of methane reforming with CO2 for hydrogen and syngas production at 600 and 750 °C [24]. The catalyst obtained by reflux was superior to the other catalysts, although the effect was not very significant.

4. Conclusions

Non-noble metal-SBA-15 composites have been extensively studied as compared with their counterparts, based on other types of ordered mesoporous silicas (MCM-41, FSM-16, KIT-6, etc.). In spite of their high specific surface areas, their potential applications as adsorbents have attracted little attention. In contrast, their catalytic properties were demonstrated in many studies. Composites containing Ni (with or without other metals) are especially promising as catalysts of numerous redox reactions. Not much work was done on the effect of the preparation method on the catalytic properties. Very likely, catalysts having the same composition as the materials already examined, but prepared in different ways (e.g., by wet impregnation in the presence of complexing agents) may show superior catalytic activities to the results in reported in Table 2. Further studies in this direction are greatly desired.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material is available for this article. The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2504-5377/2/4/59/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K.; Methodology, M.K.; Literature searches, E.M.; Tables, M.K., L.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K., E.M., L.R.; writing—review and editing, M.K., E.M.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations:

BETBrunauer, Emmett, Teller (isotherm of adsorption)
CVDchemical vapor deposition
DRIFTdiffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform (spectroscopy)
DRMdouble resonance modulation (in spectroscopy)
DTAdifferential thermal analysis
DTGdifferential thermogravimetry
EDSenergy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
EDXSenergy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
EELSelectron energy loss spectroscopy
FFTfast Fourier transform
FTIRFourier transform infrared (spectroscopy)
HRhigh resolution (TEM)
MASmagic angle spinning (NMR)
NMRnuclear magnetic resonance
SEMscanning electron microscopy
SSAspecific surface area
TEMtransmission electron microscopy
TGthermogravimetry
TGAthermogravimetric analysis
TPHtemperature-programmed hydrogenation
TPDtemperature-programmed desorption
TPOtemperature-programmed oxidation
TPRtemperature-programmed reduction
UVultraviolet
XANESX-ray absorption near edge structure
XPSX-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
XRDX-rays diffraction
XRFX-ray fluorescence

References

  1. Zhang, Z.; Luo, Y.; Guo, Y.; Shi, W.; Wang, W.; Bing, Z.; Zhang, R.; Bao, X.; Wu, S.; Cui, F. Pd and Pt nanoparticles supported on the mesoporous silica molecular sieve SBA-15 with enhanced activity and stability in catalytic bromate reduction. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 344, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, X.; Dong, H.; Gu, Z.; Wang, G.; Zuo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cui, L. Preferential carbon monoxide oxidation on Ag/Al-SBA-15 catalysts: Effect of the Si/Al ratio. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 269, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, X.; Dong, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, N.; Zuo, Y.; Cui, L. Study of catalytic activity at the Ag/Al-SBA-15 catalysts for CO oxidation and selective CO oxidation. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 283, 1097–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Singh, S.; Kumar, R.; Setiabudi, H.D.; Nanda, S.; Vo, D.V.N. Advanced synthesis strategies of mesoporous SBA-15 supported catalysts for catalytic reforming applications: A state-of-the-art review. Appl. Catal. A 2018, 559, 57–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chaudhary, V.; Sharma, S. An overview of ordered mesoporous material SBA-15: Synthesis, functionalization and application in oxidation reactions. J. Porous Mater. 2017, 24, 741–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Usman, M.; Daud, W.M.A.W.; Abbas, H.F. Dry reforming of methane: Influence of process parameters—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 45, 710–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ziolek, M.; Sobczak, I. The role of niobium component in heterogeneous catalysts. Catal. Today 2017, 285, 211–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Debecker, D.P.; Hulea, V.P.; Mutin, H. Mesoporous mixed oxide catalysts via non-hydrolytic sol–gel: A review. Appl. Catal. A 2013, 451, 192–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Akbari, A.; Amini, M.; Tarassoli, A.; Eftekhari-Sis, B.; Ghasemian, N.; Jabbari, E. Transition metal oxide nanoparticles as efficient catalysts in oxidation reactions. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2018, 14, 19–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, X.; Cheng, X.; Zhu, Y.; Elzatahry, A.A.; Alghamdi, A.; Deng, Y.; Zhao, D. Ordered porous metal oxide semiconductors for gas sensing, review article. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2018, 29, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, J.H.; Cho, Y.J.; Shin, J.M.; Yim, M.S. Bismuth-embedded SBA-15 mesoporous silica for radioactive iodine capture and stable storage. J. Nucl. Mater. 2015, 465, 556–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bhange, P.; Bhange, D.S.; Pradhan, S.; Ramaswamy, V. Direct synthesis of well-ordered mesoporous Al-SBA-15 and its correlation with the catalytic activity. Appl. Catal. A 2011, 400, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kosmulski, M.; Mączka, E. Modification of SBA-15 with vapors of aluminum and titanium chlorides. Colloids Surf. A 2017, 535, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, J.; Fang, X.; Bian, J.; Guo, Y.; Li, C. Microalgae hydrothermal liquefaction and derived biocrude upgrading with modified SBA-15 catalysts. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 266, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Xu, X.; Sun, Y.; Li, Z.; Chen, X.; Jiang, E. Hydrogen from pyroligneous acid via modified bimetal Al-SBA-15 catalysts. Appl. Catal. A 2017, 547, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ledesma, B.C.; Martínez, M.L.; Beltramone, A.R. Iridium-supported SBA-15 modified with Ga and Al as a highly active catalyst in the hydrodenitrogenation of quinolone. Catal. Today 2018, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Calles, J.; Carrero, A.A.; Vizcaíno, A.J.; García-Moreno, L. Hydrogen production by glycerol steam reforming over SBA-15-supported nickel catalysts: Effect of alkaline earth promoters on activity and stability. Catal. Today 2014, 227, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shen, X.L.; Wang, Z.Q.; Wang, Q.Y.; Liu, S.Y.; Wang, G.Y. Synthesis of poly(isosorbide carbonate) via melt polycondensation catalyzed by Ca/SBA-15 solid base. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2018, 36, 1027–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kosmulski, M.; Mączka, E. Uptake of vapors of Cd at 480–600 C and of Zn at 750–880 C by SBA-15. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 246, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mu, Z.; Li, J.J.; Duan, M.H.; Hao, Z.P.; Qiao, S. Catalytic combustion of benzene on Co/CeO2/SBA-15 and Co/SBA-15 catalysts. Catal. Commun. 2008, 9, 1874–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ren, L.H.; Li, H.; Zhang, A.; Lu, H.; Hao, Y.; Li, W.C. Porous silica as supports for controlled fabrication of Au/CeO2/SiO2 catalysts for CO oxidation: Influence of the silica nanostructures. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012, 158, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mu, Z.; Li, J.J.; Tian, H.; Hao, Z.P.; Qia, S.Z. Synthesis of mesoporous Co/Ce-SBA-15 materials and their catalytic performance in the catalytic oxidation of benzene. Mater. Res. Bull. 2008, 43, 2599–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Tsoncheva, T.; Issa, G.; Blasco, T.; Dimitrov, M.; Popova, M.; Hernández, S.; Kovacheva, D.; Atanasova, G.; Nieto, J.M.L. Catalytic VOCs elimination over copper and cerium oxide modified mesoporous SBA-15 silica. Appl. Catal. A 2013, 453, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Wang, N.; Chu, W.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, X.S. Synthesis, characterization and catalytic performances of Ce-SBA-15 supported nickel catalysts for methane dry reforming to hydrogen and syngas. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Yang, Y.; Ochoa-Hernández, C.; Pizarro, P.; de la Peña O’Shea, V.A.; Coronado, J.M.; Serrano, D.P. Ce-promoted Ni/SBA-15 catalysts for anisole hydrotreating under mild conditions. Appl. Catal. B 2016, 197, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kaminski, P.; Ziolek, M. Surface and catalytic properties of Ce-, Zr-, Au-, Cu-modified SBA-15. J. Catal. 2014, 312, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, D.; Zeng, L.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Ma, H.; Assabumrungrat, S.; Gong, J. Ceria-promoted Ni/SBA-15 catalysts for ethanol steam reforming with enhanced activity and resistance to deactivation. Appl. Catal. B 2015, 176–177, 532–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Boubekr, F.; Davidson, A.; Casale, S.; Massiani, P. Ex-nitrate Co/SBA-15 catalysts prepared with calibrated silica grains: Information given by TPR, TEM, SAXS and WAXS. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2011, 141, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cui, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Zhu, Y. Adsorption synthesized cobalt-containing mesoporous silica SBA-15 as highly active catalysts for epoxidation of styrene with molecular oxygen. Catal. Commun. 2011, 12, 417–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shukla, P.; Sun, H.; Wang, S.; Ang, H.M.; Tadé, M.O. Co-SBA-15 for heterogeneous oxidation of phenol with sulfate radical for wastewater treatment. Catal. Today 2011, 175, 380–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vizcaíno, A.J.; Carrero, A.; Calles, J.A. Comparison of ethanol steam reforming using Co and Ni catalysts supported on SBA-15 modified by Ca and Mg. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016, 146, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jabbour, K.; El Hassan, N.; Casale, S.; Estephane, J.; El Zakhem, H. Promotional effect of Ru on the activity and stability of Co/SBA-15 catalysts in dry reforming of methane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 7780–7787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xin, J.; Cui, H.; Cheng, Z.; Zhou, Z. Bimetallic Ni-Co/SBA-15 catalysts prepared by urea co-precipitation for dry reforming of methane. Appl. Catal. A 2018, 554, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. El Hassan, N.; Kaydouh, M.N.; Geagea, H.; El Zein, H.; Jabbour, K.; Casale, S.; El Zakhem, H.; Massiani, P. Low temperature dry reforming of methane on rhodium and cobalt based catalysts: Active phase stabilization by confinement in mesoporous SBA-15. Appl. Catal. A 2016, 520, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rodriguez-Gomez, A.; Pereniguez, R.; Caballero, A. Understanding the differences in catalytic performance for hydrogen production of Ni and Co supported on mesoporous SBA-15. Catal. Today 2018, 307, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Taherian, Z.; Yousefpour, M.; Tajally, M.; Khoshandam, B. Catalytic performance of Samaria-promoted Ni and Co/SBA-15 catalysts for dry reforming of methane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 24811–24822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Peña, L.; Valencia, D.; Klimova, T. CoMo/SBA-15 catalysts prepared with EDTA and citric acid and their performance in hydrodesulfurization of dibenzothiophene. Appl. Catal. B 2014, 147, 879–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Al-Fatesh, A.S.; Arafat, Y.; Atia, H.; AididIbrahim, A.; Ha, Q.L.M.; Schneider, M.; Pohl, M.M.; Fakeeha, A.H. CO2-reforming of methane to produce syngas over Co-Ni/SBA-15 catalyst: Effect of support modifiers (Mg, La and Sc) on catalytic stability. J. CO2 Util. 2017, 21, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Patel, A.; Rufford, T.E.; Rudolph, V.; Zhu, Z. Selective catalytic reduction of NO by CO over CuO supported on SBA-15: Effect of CuO loading on the activity of catalysts. Catal. Today 2011, 166, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chirieac, A.; Dragoi, B.; Ungureanu, A.; Ciotonea, C.; Mazilu, I.; Royer, S.; Mamede, A.S.; Rombi, E.; Ferino, I.; Dumitriu, E. Facile synthesis of highly dispersed and thermally stable copper-based nanoparticles supported on SBA-15 occluded with P123 surfactant for catalytic applications. J. Catal. 2016, 339, 270–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, Y.; Qiu, J.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Meng, M.; Ni, L.; Qin, C.; Peng, J. Selective Ce(III) ion-imprinted polymer grafted on Fe3O4 nanoparticles supported by SBA-15 mesopores microreactor via surface-initiated RAFT polymerization. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 234, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Huang, S.; He, S.; Deng, L.; Wang, J.; He, D.; Lu, J.; Luo, Y. One-step synthesis of methanethiol with mixture gases (CO/H2S/H2) over SBA-15 supported Mo-based catalysts. Procedia Eng. 2015, 102, 684–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rivas, I.; Alvarez, J.; Pietri, E.; Pérez-Zurita, M.J.; Goldwasser, M.R. Perovskite-type oxides in methane dry reforming: Effect of their incorporation into a mesoporous SBA-15 silica-host. Catal. Today 2010, 149, 388–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, N.; Yu, X.; Wang, Y.; Chu, W.; Liu, M. A comparison study on methane dry reforming with carbon dioxide over LaNiO3 perovskite catalysts supported on mesoporous SBA-15, MCM-41 and silica carrier. Catal. Today 2013, 212, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kang, D.; Lim, H.S.; Lee, J.W. Enhanced catalytic activity of methane dry reforming by the confinement of Ni nanoparticles into mesoporous silica. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 11270–11282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gálvez, M.E.; Albarazi, A.; Da Costa, P. Enhanced catalytic stability through non-conventional synthesis of Ni/SBA-15 for methane dry reforming at low temperatures. Appl. Catal. A 2015, 504, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Prasanth, K.P.; Raj, M.; Bajaj, H.C.; Kim, T.H.; Jasra, R.V. Hydrogen sorption in transition metal modified mesoporous materials. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 2351–2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Taherian, Z.; Yousefpour, M.; Tajally, M.; Khoshandam, B. A comparative study of ZrO2, Y2O3 and Sm2O3 promoted Ni/SBA-15 catalysts for evaluation of CO2/methane reforming performance. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 16408–16420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gil, A.G.; Wu, Z.; Chadwick, D.; Li, K. Ni/SBA-15 Catalysts for combined steam methane reforming and water gas shift—Prepared for use in catalytic membrane reactors. Appl. Catal. A 2015, 506, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Karam, L.; Casale, S.; El Zakhem, H.; El Hassan, N. Tuning the properties of nickel nanoparticles inside SBA-15 mesopores for enhanced stability in methane reforming. J. CO2 Util. 2017, 21, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Taherian, Z.; Yousefpour, M.; Tajally, M.; Khoshandam, B. Promotional effect of samarium on the activity and stability of Ni-SBA-15 catalysts in dry reforming of methane. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 251, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tao, M.; Meng, X.; Xin, Z.; Bian, Z.; Lv, Y.; Gu, J. Synthesis and characterization of well dispersed nickel-incorporated SBA-15 and its high activity in syngas methanation reaction. Appl. Catal. A 2016, 516, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shanmugam, V.; Zapf, R.; Neuberg, S.; Hessel, V.; Kolb, G. Effect of ceria and zirconia promotors on Ni/SBA-15 catalysts for coking and sintering resistant steam reforming of propylene glycol in microreactors. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 203, 859–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yang, W.; Liu, H.; Li, Y.; Wu, H.; He, D. CO2 reforming of methane to syngas over highly-stable Ni/SBA-15 catalysts prepared by P123-assisted method. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 1513–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, H.; Li, Y.; Wu, H.; Liu, J.; He, D. Effects of α- and γ-cyclodextrin-modified impregnation method on physicochemical properties of Ni/SBA-15 and its catalytic performance in CO2 reforming of methane. Chin. J. Catal. 2015, 36, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, Q.; Long, K.; Wang, J.; Zhang, T.; Song, Z.; Lin, Q. A novel promoting effect of chelating ligand on the dispersion of Ni species over Ni/SBA-15 catalyst for dry reforming of methane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 14103–14114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ortega-Domínguez, R.A.; Vargas-Villagrán, H.; Peñaloza-Orta, C.; Saavedra-Rubio, K.; Bokhimi, X.; Klimova, T.E. A facile method to increase metal dispersion and hydrogenation activity of Ni/SBA-15 catalysts. Fuel 2017, 198, 110–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yang, W.; He, D. Role of poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) in Ni dispersion for highly-dispersed Ni/SBA-15 catalyst and its catalytic performance in carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Appl. Catal. A 2016, 524, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. He, S.; Mei, Z.; Liu, N.; Zhang, L.; Lu, J.; Li, X.; Wang, J.; He, D.; Luo, Y. Ni/SBA-15 catalysts for hydrogen production by ethanol steam reforming: Effect of nickel precursor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 14429–14438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, T.; Shi, Y.; Zhao, B.; Wang, M.; Liu, Q.; Wang, J.; Long, K.; Duan, Y.; Ning, P. A sintering and carbon-resistant Ni-SBA-15 catalyst prepared by solid-state grinding method for dry reforming of methane. J. CO2 Util. 2017, 17, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cakiryilmaz, N.; Arbag, H.; Oktar, N.; Dogu, G.; Dogu, T. Effect of W incorporation on the product distribution in steam reforming of bio-oil derived acetic acid over Ni based Zr-SBA-15 catalyst. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 3629–3642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kaydouh, M.N.; Hassan, N.E.; Davidson, A.; Casale, S.; El Zakhem, H.; Massiani, P. Effect of the order of Ni and Ce addition in SBA-15 on the activity in dry reforming of methane. C. R. Chim. 2015, 18, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Setiabudia, H.D.; Chonga, C.C.; Abeda, S.M.; Tehc, L.P.; China, S.Y. Comparative study of Ni-Ce loading method: Beneficial effect of ultrasonicassisted impregnation method in CO2 reforming of CH4 over Ni-Ce/SBA-15. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 745–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zuo, Z.J.; Shen, C.F.; Tan, P.J.; Huang, W. Ni based on dual-support Mg-Al mixed oxides and SBA-15 catalysts for dry reforming of methane. Catal. Commun. 2013, 41, 132–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bulánek, R.; Kalužová, A.; Setnička, M.; Zukal, A.; Čičmanec, P.; Mayerová, J. Study of vanadium based mesoporous silicas for oxidative dehydrogenation of propane and n-butane. Catal. Today 2012, 179, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mitran, G.; Ahmed, R.; Iro, E.; Hajimirzaee, S.; Hodgson, S.; Urda, A.; Olea, M.; Marcu, I.C. Propane oxidative dehydrogenation over VOx/SBA-15 catalysts. Catal. Today 2018, 306, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, Z.; Ma, Z.; Jiao, J.; Yin, H.; Yan, W.; Hagaman, E.W.; Yu, J.; Dai, S. Surface functionalization of mesoporous silica SBA-15 by liquid-phase grafting of zirconium phosphate. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2010, 129, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Albarazi, A.; Gálvez, M.E.; Da Costa, P. Synthesis strategies of ceria–zirconia doped Ni/SBA-15 catalysts for methane dry reforming. Catal. Commun. 2015, 59, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. SBA-15 and SBA-15-metal composites as adsorbents.
Table 1. SBA-15 and SBA-15-metal composites as adsorbents.
Metal/CodeGas/Liquid, t/°C, Equilibration TimeAdsorbate Concentration RangeResultReference
Ni2Gas, 750, 1 hHydrogen3% H2/Ar0.023 mmol/g Ni2[46]
Ni30.068 mmol/g Ni3
Ni40.055 mmol/g Ni4
Ni5Gas, −195, 1 hHydrogen112 kPa76.8 mL/g Ni5[47]
Gas, 30, 1 h4000 kPa 17.6 mL/g Ni6
Table
Table 2. SBA-15 and SBA-15-metal composites as catalysts.
Table 2. SBA-15 and SBA-15-metal composites as catalysts.
Metal/CodeReactiont, ᵒCConversion, % Equilibration TimeSelectivity %Reference
None1Degradation of quinoline3003 [16]
None2Reaction of diphenyl carbonate with isosorbide to poly(isosorbide carbonate)24067 [18]
None3Conversion of 2,5-hexanedione to 2,5-dimethylfuran 350819[26]
Conversion of 2,5-hexanedione to 3-methyl-2-cyclopentenone 81
None4Conversion of acetic acid to hydrogen750742[61]
Al3Esterification of acetic acid with n-butanol8070 [12]
Al3Benzylation of anisole10012
Al4Esterification of acetic acid with n-butanol8080
Al4Benzylation of anisole10025
Al5Esterification of acetic acid with n-butanol8073
Al5Benzylation of anisole10051
Al6Esterification of acetic acid with n-butanol8058
Al6Benzylation of anisole10055
Al15Decarboxylation of methyl palmitate to alkane3404565[14]
Al166975
Al177872
Al21Degradation of quinoline 3008 [16]
Ca2Reaction of diphenyl carbonate with isosorbide to poly(isosorbide carbonate)24082 [18]
Ca388
Ca494
Ca595
Ca694
Ca790
Ce6Conversion of toluene to carbon dioxide 3605895[23]
Conversion of ethyl acetate to ethanol8131
Ce15Conversion of 2,5-hexanedione to 2,5-dimethylfuran 350513[26]
Conversion of 2,5-hexanedione to 3-methyl-2-cyclopentenone 97
Oxidation of methanol to methanal250721
3501350
Conversion of methanol to dimethyl ether 25074
350133
Conversion of methanol to methyl formate 25075
3501340
Ce/Ni8Conversion of anisole to methoxycyclohexane270781[25]
2901859
Ce/Ni92702676
2902955
Ce/Ni102702870
2903349
Ce/Ni11Conversion of methanol to hydrogen6509785[27]
Ce/Ni129890
Ce/Ni1310098
Ce/Ni149885
Ce/Zr1Conversion of 2,5-hexanedione to 2,5-dimethylfuran 3504615[26]
Conversion of 2,5-hexanedione to 3-methyl-2-cyclopentenone 85
Oxidation of methanol to methanal250539
Conversion of methanol to methyl formate13
Conversion of methanol to dimethyl ether44
Oxidation of methanol to methanal3501748
Conversion of methanol to methyl formate36
Conversion of methanol to dimethyl ether10
Ce/Zr2Oxidation of methanol to methanal250333 *
Conversion of methanol to dimethyl ether52 *
Conversion of methanol to methyl formate 25 *
Conversion of 2,5-hexanedione to 2,5-dimethylfuran 3505518
Conversion of 2,5-hexanedione to 3-methyl-2-cyclopentenone 82
Conversion of methanol to methyl formate1226
Oxidation of methanol to methanal40
Conversion of methanol to dimethyl ether30
Co1Conversion of benzene to CO2 and H2O (oxidation of benzene)24048 [20]
255100
Co5Epoxidation of styrene with oxygen 1007063[29]
8264
9263
9466
4855
Co14Conversion of CO2 to CO75340 [32]
Conversion of CH4 to H272844
Co15Dry reforming of CH4 with CO2 (conversion CH4)70020 [33]
Co16Conversion of CH4 to H255022 [34]
70078
Conversion of CO2 to CO55018
70090
Co17Dry reforming of CH4 with CO2 (conversion of CH4)7500 [35]
Co185502 [36]
6008
70024
Co/Ce1Conversion of benzene to CO2 and H2O (oxidation of benzene)28051 [20]
320100
Co/Ce2Oxidation of benzene22010 [22]
26050
27590
Co/Ce322010
26550
30090
Co/Ce424510
28050
30090
Co/Ce524510
30050
31690
Co/Ce625510
31950
34090
Co/Ce727010
34050
37290
Co/Mo1Hydrodesulfurization of dibenzothiophene30016 (4 h) [37]
37 (8 h)
Co/Mo225 (4 h)
53 (8 h)
Co/Mo330 (4 h)
63 (8 h)
Co/Mo434 (4 h)
62 (8 h)
Co/Mo538 (4 h)
76 (8 h)
Co/Mo648 (4 h)
92 (8 h)
Co/Mo722 (4 h)
43 (8 h)
Co/Mo830 (4 h)
62 (8 h)
Co/Mo935 (4 h)
77 (8 h)
Co/Ni1Conversion of CH4 to H270055 [38]
Conversion of CO2 to CO69
Co/Ni2Conversion of CH4 to H276
Conversion of CO2 to CO81
Co/Ni3Conversion of CH4 to H245
Conversion of CO2 to CO60
Co/Ni4Conversion of CO2 to CO80
Conversion of CH4 to H274
Co/Ru1Conversion of CH4 to H277542 [32]
Conversion of CO2 to CO75040
Co/Ru2Conversion of CH4 to H279082
Conversion of CO2 to CO71
Co/Ru3Conversion of CO2 to CO76263
Conversion of CH4 to H279069
Cr1Epoxidation of styrene with oxygen 1001348[29]
Cu1Conversion of ethyl acetate to ethanol 3601722[23]
Conversion of toluene to carbon dioxide 5890
Cu2Reduction of NO to N244030 [39]
51045
Cu344040
49055
Cu44407
49020
Cu5Epoxidation of styrene with oxygen 10000[29]
Cu/Al1Decarboxylation of methyl palmitate to alkane 3407572[14]
Cu/Ce1Conversion of toluene to carbon dioxide 3606593[23]
Conversion of ethyl acetate to ethanol 5010
Cu/Ce2Conversion of toluene to carbon dioxide 7191
Conversion of ethyl acetate to ethanol 6013
Cu/Ce3Conversion of toluene to carbon dioxide 7694
Conversion of ethyl acetate to ethanol 917
Cu/Ce4Conversion of methanol to methyl formate250685[26]
Cu/Ce4Oxidation of methanol to methanal6
Cu/Ce4Conversion of methanol to dimethyl ether0
Cu/Ce5Conversion of methanol to dimethyl ether72
Conversion of methanol to methyl formate 87
Oxidation of methanol to methanal9
Cu/Ce6Conversion of methanol to methyl formate 674
Conversion of methanol to dimethyl ether 1
Oxidation of methanol to methanal18
Cu/Ni1Conversion of cinnamaldehyde to hydrocinnamyl alcohol130608[40]
Oxidation of carbon oxide to carbon dioxide 16027
Cu/Ni2Conversion of cinnamaldehyde to hydrocinnamyl alcohol1306010
Oxidation of carbon oxide to carbon dioxide 16040
Cu/Ni3Conversion of cinnamaldehyde to hydrocinnamyl alcohol1306024
Oxidation of carbon oxide to carbon dioxide 16043
Cu/Ni4Conversion of cinnamaldehyde to hydrocinnamyl alcohol1306020
Oxidation of carbon oxide to carbon dioxide 16050
Cu/Zn1Decarboxylation of methyl palmitate to alkane 3407178[14]
Cu/Zr1Oxidation of methanol to methanal2501516[26]
Conversion of methanol to methyl formate 68
Conversion of methanol to dimethyl ether 5
Fe5Epoxidation of styrene with oxygen 1002156[29]
Ga1Degradation of quinoline 3005 [16]
K/Mo2Conversion of CO, H2S, H2 to methanethiol 2756140[42]
3006247
3256345
3506438
3756426
La/Ni1Dry reforming of CH4 with CO2 (conversion of CH4)60063 [43]
70088
La/Ni260069
70082
La/Ni360053
70086
La/Ni4Conversion of CH4 to H26004279[44]
7509597
Conversion of CO2 to CO60040
75080 [44]
Mn1Epoxidation of styrene with oxygen 100336[29]
Ni1Conversion of methane to hydrogen75088 [45]
Conversion of carbon dioxide to carbon oxide86
Ni2Conversion of methane to hydrogen50020 [46]
70070
Conversion of carbon dioxide to carbon oxide 50025
60065
Ni3Conversion of methane to hydrogen50015
70075
Conversion of carbon dioxide to carbon oxide and hydrogen50020
60050
Ni4Conversion of carbon dioxide to carbon oxide and hydrogen50030
600100
Conversion of methane to hydrogen50018
70080
Ni6Epoxidation of styrene with oxygen 100638[29]
Ni7Methane reforming with CO2 for hydrogen and syngas production (conversion of methane)60049 [24]
75079
Ni8Conversion of CH4 to H255010 [48]
70055
Conversion of CO2 to CO55020
70077
Ni9Conversion of glycerol to H26009053[17]
Ni14Conversion CH4 to CO2 and CO (selectivity for CO2)400597[49]
4501591
5002087
5502583
Ni15Conversion of CH4 to H26507 [50]
Conversion of CO2 to CO7
Ni16Conversion of CH4 to H262
Conversion of CO2 to CO70
Ni17Conversion of CH4 to H220
Conversion of CO2 to CO27
Ni18Conversion of CH4 to H25508 [51]
65035
Conversion of CO2 to CO55016
65047
Ni19Dry reforming of CH4 with CO2 (conversion CH4)70077 [33]
Ni20Reaction of syngas to methane (conversion of CO)40083 [52]
Ni21100
Ni2225064
40098
Ni2325040
400100
Ni24Conversion of anisole to methoxycyclohexane 270680[25]
2901561
Ni25Reforming of propylene glycol (selectivity for H2)6308857[53]
Ni29Conversion of CH4 to H275051 [54]
Conversion of CO2 to CO65
Ni30Conversion of CO2 to CO67
Conversion of CH4 to H256
Ni31Conversion of CO2 to CO91
Conversion of CH4 to H276
Ni32Conversion of CO2 to CO90
Conversion of CH4 to H277
Ni33Conversion of CH4 to H278
Conversion of CO2 to CO92
Ni34Conversion of CH4 to H268
Conversion of CO2 to CO78
Ni35 Conversion of CH4 to H270087 [55]
Conversion of CO2 to CO94
Ni36Conversion of CH4 to H269
Conversion of CO2 to CO79
Ni37Conversion of CH4 to H260041 [56]
80093
Conversion of CO2 to CO60058
80095
Ni38Conversion of CH4 to H260040
80092
Conversion of CO2 to CO60056
80094
Ni39Conversion of CH4 to H260041
80093
Conversion of CO2 to CO60060
80095
Ni40Conversion of CH4 to H260040
80093
Conversion of CO2 to CO60045
80094
Ni41Conversion of naphthalene to tetralin 30091 [57]
Conversion of naphthalene to cis-decalin 5
Ni42Conversion of naphthalene to tetralin 88
Conversion of naphthalene to cis-decalin 6
Ni43Conversion of naphthalene to tetralin 87
Conversion of naphthalene to cis-decalin 7
Ni44Conversion of naphthalene to tetralin 87
Conversion of naphthalene to cis-decalin 7
Ni45Conversion of naphthalene to tetralin 49
Conversion of naphthalene to cis-decalin 25
Ni46Conversion of naphthalene to tetralin 30
Conversion of naphthalene to cis-decalin 34
Ni47Conversion of naphthalene to tetralin 38
Conversion of naphthalene to cis-decalin 31
Ni48Conversion of naphthalene to tetralin 23
Conversion of naphthalene to cis-decalin 38
Ni49Conversion of naphthalene to tetralin 22
Conversion of naphthalene to cis-decalin 40
Ni50Conversion of naphthalene to tetralin 12
Conversion of naphthalene to cis-decalin 44
Ni51Conversion of CH4 to H275051 [58]
Conversion of CO2 to CO65
Ni52Conversion of CH4 to H265
Conversion of CO2 to CO75
Ni53Conversion of CH4 to H270
Conversion of CO2 to CO84
Ni54Conversion of CH4 to H279
Conversion of CO2 to CO85
Ni55Conversion of CH4 to H276
Conversion of CO2 to CO84
Ni56Conversion of CH4 to H260
Conversion of CO2 to CO70
Ni57Conversion of ethanol to CO, CH4, CO2 4009923 CH4[59]
12 CO2
Ni5810023 CH4
12 CO2
Ni5910024 CH4
1 CO2
Ni6010022 CH4
1 CO2
Ni6110024 CH4
2 CO2
Ni62Conversion of methanol to hydrogen 6508562[27]
Ni63Conversion of methane to hydrogen 65061 [60]
80094
Ni6465062
80096
Ni65Dry reforming of CH4 with CO2 (conversion CH4)75060 [35]
Ni66 Conversion of acetic acid to hydrogen 75010070[61]
Ni67Dry reforming of CH4 with CO2 (conversion of CH4)5509 [36]
Ni6760021
Ni6770051
Ni/Ca1Conversion of glycerol to H26009853[17]
Ni/Ce1Methane reforming with CO2 for hydrogen and syngas production (conversion of methane)60052 [24]
75078
Ni/Ce260056
75079
Ni/Ce360057
75090
Ni/Ce5Conversion of CH4 to H24006 [62]
70070
Conversion of CO2 to CO4005
70066
Ni/Ce6Conversion of CH4 to H240040
70092
Conversion of CO2 to CO40042
70085
Ni/Ce7Conversion of anisole to methoxycyclohexane270781[25]
2901561
Ni/Ce8Reforming of propylene glycol (selectivity for H2)6309541[53]
Ni/Ce109638
Ni/Ce11Conversion of CH4 to H280080 [63]
Conversion of CO2 to CO80080
Ni/Ce12Conversion of CH4 to H280095
Conversion of CO2 to CO80090
Ni/Ce13Conversion of CH4 to H280090
Conversion of CO2 to CO80085
Ni/Co1Dry reforming of CH4 with CO2 (conversion of CH4)70075 [33]
Ni/Co273
Ni/Co374
Ni/Co450
Ni/Co540
Ni/Co7Dry reforming of CH4 with CO2 (conversion CH4)7503 [35]
Ni/Mg1Dry reforming of CH4 with CO2 (conversion of CH4)80085 [64]
Ni/Mg275
Ni/Mg3400
Ni/Mg498
Ni/Mg580
Ni/Mg6Conversion of glycerol to H26009953[17]
Ni/Sm1Conversion of CO2 to CO55014 [51]
65037
Conversion of CH4 to H25508
65021
Ni/Sm2Conversion of CO2 to CO55025
65056
Conversion of CH4 to H255016
65044
Ni/Sm3Conversion of CO2 to CO55033
65057
Conversion of CH4 to H255025
65054
Ni/W4Conversion of acetic acid to hydrogen6509128[61]
7009324
7509345
Ni/Y1Conversion of CH4 to H255013 [48]
70070
Conversion of CO2 to CO55022
70055
Ni/Zr1Conversion of CH4 to H255015
70045
Conversion of CO2 to CO55022
70074
Ni/Zr2Reforming of propylene glycol (selectivity for H2)6309736[53]
Ni/Zr3Conversion of acetic acid to hydrogen75010058[61]
SmDry reforming of CH4 with CO2 (conversion of CH4)5502 [36]
6003
70011
Sm/Ni4Conversion of CO2 to CO55035 [48]
70074
Conversion of CH4 to H255028
70072
Sm/Ni2Dry reforming of CH4 with CO2 (conversion of CH4)55019 [36]
60029
70058
V1Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to lower hydrocarbons, CO2, CO54059 [65]
Oxidative dehydrogenation of n-butane to lower hydrocarbons, CO2, CO63
V2Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to lower hydrocarbons, CO2, CO62
Oxidative dehydrogenation of n-butane to lower hydrocarbons, CO2, CO95
V3Conversion of propane to propene450187[66]
500380
5501268
6001666
V4450184
500474
5501364
6001862
V5450183
500572
5501459
6001957
V6450173
500665
5501544
6002041
V7450271
500758
5501639
6002238
Zn1Epoxidation of styrene with oxygen100457[29]
Zn/Al1Decarboxylation of methyl palmitate to alkane 3406780[14]
Zr2Conversion of 2,5-hexanedione to 2,5-dimethylfuran 3506422[26]
Conversion of 2,5-hexanedione to 3-methyl-2-cyclopentenone 6478
Conversion of methanol to dimethyl ether 2501100
Conversion of methanol to methyl formate 0
Oxidation of methanol to methanal0
Conversion of methanol to dimethyl ether3501943
Conversion of methanol to methyl formate42
Oxidation of methanol to methanal28
Zr3Conversion of acetic acid to hydrogen 750962[61]
Zr/Ce1Conversion of methane to hydrogen74091 [68]
800100
Conversion of carbon dioxide to carbon oxide and hydrogen62080
650100
Zr/Ce2Conversion of methane to hydrogen74085
86095
Conversion of carbon dioxide to carbon oxide and hydrogen62058
750100
Zr/Ce3Conversion of methane to hydrogen74087
80098
Conversion of carbon dioxide to carbon oxide and hydrogen62050
810100
* Error in the original paper.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kosmulski, M.; Mączka, E.; Ruchomski, L. Synthesis and Properties of SBA-15 Modified with Non-Noble Metals. Colloids Interfaces 2018, 2, 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids2040059

AMA Style

Kosmulski M, Mączka E, Ruchomski L. Synthesis and Properties of SBA-15 Modified with Non-Noble Metals. Colloids and Interfaces. 2018; 2(4):59. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids2040059

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kosmulski, Marek, Edward Mączka, and Leszek Ruchomski. 2018. "Synthesis and Properties of SBA-15 Modified with Non-Noble Metals" Colloids and Interfaces 2, no. 4: 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids2040059

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop