Next Article in Journal
Kinetic and Machine Learning Modeling of Heat-Induced Colloidal Size Changes in Camel Milk
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Lipid-Based Nanofungicide Formulation for Effective Control of Ganoderma boninense in Oil Palm
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Bioactivity and Antibacterial Properties of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Surfaces Modified by Electrical Discharge Machining
Previous Article in Special Issue
Wetting Behavior of Cationic and Anionic Surfactants on Hydrophobic Surfaces: Surface Tension and Contact Angle Measurements
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biocompatible Emulsions Stabilized by Natural Silk Fibroin

1
State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2
Institute for Condensed Matter Physics, Technical University of Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Colloids Interfaces 2026, 10(1), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids10010013
Submission received: 1 December 2025 / Revised: 15 January 2026 / Accepted: 19 January 2026 / Published: 26 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State of the Art of Colloid and Interface Science in Asia)

Abstract

Due to its amphiphilicity, the natural fibrous structural protein, silk fibroin (SF), can adsorb at the oil/water interface, form protective viscoelastic layers, and stabilize emulsions. Biocompatible SF-stabilized emulsions can be used in different fields of cosmetics, food, drug delivery, and biomedicine. Depending on the silk processing method, various emulsion types can be obtained, such as film-stabilized emulsions stabilized by SF molecules and Pickering emulsions stabilized by nanostructured SF or SF particles. Nanostructured SF and SF particles, with β-sheet dominated secondary structures, can overcome the drawback of SF molecules with unstable conformation transition during application, and thus endow higher emulsion stability than SF molecules. The emulsions stabilized by SF nanoparticles can endure heat and high ionic strength, while the emulsions stabilized by SF nanofibers show superior stability at high temperature, high salinity, and low pH due to the strong interfacial entangled nanofiber networks. In this review, the recent progress in research on SF-stabilized emulsions is summarized and generalized, including a systematic comparison of the stabilization mechanisms for different SF morphologies, and the influences of the emulsion fabrication technique, component type and proportions, and environmental conditions on the microstructures and properties of SF-stabilized emulsions. Understanding the stabilization mechanism and factors influencing the emulsion stability is of great significance for the design, preparation and application of SF-stabilized emulsions.

1. Introduction

Emulsions, which help to incorporate, encapsulate, or deliver lipophilic bioactive compounds into various products, are widely utilized in the fields of food, pharmaceuticals, personal care, and cosmetics [1]. In fact, emulsions are thermodynamically unstable systems consisting of at least two immiscible liquids, one of which is dispersed in the form of droplets in the other, and they tend to break down due to the effects of gravitational separation or creaming, flocculation, drop coalescence, and Ostwald ripening [2]. However, emulsions can be stabilized by amphiphilic agents, such as traditional surfactants, proteins, or colloidal solid particles, which can reduce interfacial tension, form interfacial films, and prevent droplets from coalescing [3,4]. As a kind of novel emulsifier, proteins have attracted great attention due to their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and intrinsic amphiphilic properties [5]. It is widely accepted that proteins, which are nontoxic, abundant, and biologically sustainable, can replace synthetic surfactants to produce environmentally friendly emulsion products [6].
Generally, proteins’ intrinsic properties and their concentration, as well as their environmental conditions like pH, temperature, and additives, significantly affect their surface activity, interfacial adsorbed layers, and the resulting emulsion stability [7,8]. Increasing protein concentration helps, for example, to increase the adsorption rate and structural rearrangements of bovine serum albumin (BSA) and to shorten the gelation time of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) at oil/water interfaces [9,10]. At the isoelectric pH value (pI), BSA and human immunoglobulin G exhibit a minimum interfacial elastic modulus and tension [11], and emulsions stabilized by BSA or whey proteins exhibit a larger droplet size than at other pH values due to the weakening of the electrostatic repulsions between droplets [12,13]. The adsorption layers of potato protein isolate show a major elastic response and a higher ability to produce stable emulsions at pH 8 rather than at pH 2 [14]. As for BSA, the increase in ionic strength leads to an increased interfacial elasticity, a decrease in the interfacial tension, and an easily packed compact coiled conformation due to the counter-ion screening effect [11]. β-Lactoglobulin (BLG) can form complexes with cationic alkyltrimethylammonium bromide (ATAB) surfactants and anionic sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) surfactant due to electrostatic interactions, but with the increase in surfactant concentration, the surfactant domains begin to govern the interfacial properties after a gradual replacement of the protein molecules from the interface [15]. Owing to the competitive adsorption of nonionic surfactants, the incorporation of Tween 20 results in a remarkable decrease in the surface shear viscosity of BLG layers at the n-tetradecane/water interface [16], and the addition of Tween 60 causes a notable reduction in the layer thickness of casein at the soy-oil/water interface [17].
Silk fibroin (SF), as a fibrous structural protein isolated from domesticated silkworms, exhibits excellent mechanical properties and biocompatibility and minimal inflammatory reactions, and therefore, it has attracted great attention in biotechnological and biomedical applications, and also in the production of functional food [18,19,20]. Depending on the silk processing methods, SF exists in different forms like random coil, α-helix, and crystalline β-sheets [21], and can be produced as films, gels, membranes, powders, and porous sponges [22,23]. SF consists of highly repetitive amino acid sequences with alternating hydrophobic and hydrophilic blocks along the molecular chain [24,25], and the resulting amphiphilicity, and hence surface activity, endows SF with the ability to adsorb at oil/water interfaces just like surfactant molecules, form protective viscoelastic layers, and stabilize emulsions [26,27,28,29,30,31]. Biocompatible emulsions stabilized by SF have a promising future for applications in different fields of cosmetics, food, drug delivery and biomedicine [5]. Moreover, taking advantage of the emulsions stabilized by SF, biodegradable microparticles and microspheres for drug delivery [32,33], electrospun nanofibers, and scaffolds for tissue engineering [34,35], high-strength shape-memory organohydrogels can be produced [36]. Different morphologies of SF can produce various emulsions, those stabilized by molecular SF films and Pickering emulsions stabilized by nanostructured SF and SF particles [31]. Pre-structured SF, such as SF nanofibers, SF nanobrushes, and SF micro- or nanoparticles, can overcome the drawback of SF molecules with unstable conformation transitions during application, and endow the emulsions with a higher stability. In this review, the recent progress in research on SF-stabilized emulsions is summarized and generalized, including a systematic comparison of the stabilization mechanism for SF with different morphologies, and the influences of the emulsion fabrication technique, SF concentration, oil polarity and ratio, pH, and ionic strength on the microstructures and properties of SF-stabilized emulsions. Understanding the stabilization mechanism and influence factors for the emulsion stability is of great significance for the design, preparation, and application of SF-stabilized emulsions.

2. Emulsions Stabilized by Silk Fibroin Molecules

After the extraction of sericin by degumming with a Na2CO3 aqueous solution, the dissolution of cocoon fibers with a LiBr aqueous solution, and the dialysis against de-ionized water, SF aqueous solutions with a concentration of 19–21 mg/mL can be achieved from fresh domestic Bombyx mori cocoons [26,27,36,37,38]. The molecular weight of SF is 8–30 kDa, where the low-molecular-weight components result from molecular breakage during the degumming process [37]. Homogenization is a simple, high-energy method to produce emulsions [37]. By utilizing high-shear dispersion emulsifiers, SF molecules initially solved in water can emulsify different oil phases, like other proteins. With the increase in homogenization speed and time, the size of emulsion droplets decreases (see Figure 1), and the droplet coalescence slows down [37,38]. Moreover, the emulsions fabricated at higher homogenization speeds exhibit fewer irregular droplets, a faster liquid-gel transition, and less creaming during storage than those obtained at lower homogenization speeds. However, the emulsions fabricated at longer homogenization times show no obvious changes with regard to the creaming stability [37]. Thus, speeding up and prolonging the homogenization step play an important role in slowing down the droplet coalescence, and therefore are beneficial for producing more stable emulsions with smaller and more regular droplets. However, when the homogenization speed and time exceed a critical value, the emulsions change from a liquid state to a semi-gel [37].
Compared to traditional surfactants, SF molecules diffuse and adsorb more slowly to the oil/water interface. The interface allows only a limited amount of SF molecules to adsorb, and further increase in the SF concentration (CSF) leads to an excess of SF in the bulk or structural defects in the interfacial networks [29]. The formation of interfacial films with β-sheet secondary structures after adsorption is very slow, too, and takes several hours to attain equilibrium, especially for high CSF and more polar oil phases [29]. Like lysozyme [39], not all the droplets of SF-stabilized emulsions exhibit spherical shapes, but rather are elliptical or have even more intricate shapes because of the high interfacial storage moduli (see Figure 2) [27,28,37]. In addition, an increased oil content can also result in a slight deformation of emulsion droplets at the edge due to the dense packing and squeezing of the droplets [35]. The size of emulsion droplets decreases with the increase in CSF [26,36,37,38], which can be attributed to the enhanced protein adsorption, the strengthening of interfacial elasticity, and the resulting suppression of flow-induced coalescence, in line with the results reported for sweet potato proteins and concentrated flaxseed proteins [40,41]. The increase in droplet size with increasing oil/water volume ratio (ϕo) [26,35,36,37,38] is related to the increase in the total droplet surface area and the droplet collision frequency, and the decrease in the amount of adsorbed SF molecules. Taken together, all this results in less robust and protective interfacial layers and, in turn, promotes droplet coalescence [26]. When the oil content exceeds a certain percentage, the emulsification fails with oil leakage due to the insufficient loading of the droplets by protein molecules [38]. Moreover, the droplet size decreases with the increase in oil polarity from dodecane to hexanol, which can be attributed to lower corresponding interfacial tension [42]. However, the dodecane/water emulsion with larger droplets exhibits better dispersed oil droplets in the continuous water phase with less flocs, which was interpreted as a consequence of the higher interfacial modulus of the SF layers formed at the dodecane/water interface than those at other polar oil/water interfaces [26]. The decrease in initial emulsion droplet size helps to decrease emulsion creaming and improve the emulsion stability [37]. With an increased storage time, the emulsion droplets become gradually irregular and increase in size because of droplet coalescence [37].
In general, the emulsion stability can be evaluated by the creaming index (CI), which is obtained by dividing the serum layer height by the total emulsion height [27]. Creaming, followed by phase separation with released water and/or oil, is one of the destabilization mechanisms of emulsions caused by gravity [26]. During emulsification, there is a dynamic equilibrium between the droplet disruption and droplet coalescence. Therefore, before reaching a steady state, all O/W emulsions stabilized by SF experience an initial increase in the CI value. CI decreases with the increase in CSF and ϕo (see Figure 3), and it is obvious that the emulsion stability is greatly improved by increasing CSF and ϕo [26,36,37]. Before a saturated interfacial adsorption is reached, high CSF helps to shorten the time to attain adsorption equilibration, and to form denser adsorption layers with stronger colloidal networks, thus leading to a higher interfacial elastic modulus, slower droplet coalescence, and less creaming [26,37,38]. Moreover, denser adsorption layers hinder the droplet movement, which results in higher elastic moduli, a complex bulk viscosity, and yield stress of the emulsions, which all together further enhance the emulsion stability [26,27]. However, as CSF exceeds a critical value, the adsorbed SF molecules can no longer pack well due to the jamming state and nonideal molecular arrangements, which causes the decrease in interfacial elasticity and toughness [29]. This leads to the change in the emulsions from a liquid state to a semi-gel [37]. Higher ϕo leads to a closer packing and stronger interactions between the droplets, thus leading to a faster liquid-gel transition, enhanced elastic modulus, complex viscosity, and yield stress of the emulsion, and to a higher emulsion stability with less creaming [26,40,43]. However, larger ϕo brings about more irregular droplet shapes and faster droplet coalescence during storage, owing to the decreased SF adsorption and increased number of droplet collisions [26,37]. The high internal phase emulsions with more oil are easier to form emulsion gels and have a semi-solid texture. Emulsion semi-gels and gels are widely used in the food industry [37]. Evidently, it is the enhancement of SF adsorption and the increased packing of oil droplets that promote the modulus, yield stress, and then the emulsion stability [26,36,44]. Moreover, as for the SF-stabilized emulsions, higher oil polarity results in larger storage moduli, enhanced yield stresses, slower equilibration of emulsions, and higher emulsion stability with less water released before reaching a steady state, although the interfacial modulus of SF is lower at polar oil/water than that at nonpolar oil/water interfaces [26]. It seems that the emulsion system behavior is more complex than the single oil/water interfaces, and sometimes, the impact of SF on the interfacial viscoelasticity and emulsion stability is slightly different upon the change in preparation conditions. The butyl butyrate oil leads to a two-stage creaming process because of its spatial restriction of the ester groups, which affects interfacial molecular arrangements in ways that are negative for emulsion stability [27]. Although some water or serum is released after emulsification, the remaining emulsions are very stable over several months, owing to the protection by the adsorbed interfacial SF layers that suppress droplet coalescence. The interfacial shear rheological behavior of SF layers shows that the adsorbed SF molecules form elastic networks with β-sheet dominated structures at oil/water interfaces through conformation transitions, structural reorganization, and physical crosslinking [29,35], so that the equilibrium shear storage modulus (Ge) of the adsorbed SF layers is much higher than those, for example, of mAb, β-casein, and BLG layers at oil/water interfaces [10,45,46]. The bulk rheological behavior of SF-stabilized emulsions indicates that well-developed three-dimensional elastic network structures also exist in emulsions [26], and the network formation should be attributed to the close packing and association of droplets [47], which can be clearly observed in the insets of Figure 2, especially for emulsions with larger CSF and ϕo [26]. The formed strong elastic networks by SF self-assembly at the oil/water interface significantly enhanced the emulsion stability.
The environmental conditions show a great influence on the stability of emulsions stabilized by SF. The stable emulsion fraction is higher for systems with pure water than with buffer, especially at pH 4, although the interfacial tension at pH 4 shows a faster and more remarkable decrease and the lowest equilibrium values. At pH 4 around the isoelectric point (pI) of SF, the charge-neutralized SF molecules no longer repel each other electrostatically and therefore aggregate more easily and form more rigid interfacial layers with compact structures [27], which result in a faster molecular adsorption at the interface and a higher modulus of interfacial layers at low CSF (see Figure 4). However, the weakening of interfacial ductility directly causes an easier structural rupture and a subsequent droplet coalescence upon small emulsion perturbations [48,49], thus providing emulsions with a lower emulsion stability and larger droplet size [27]. When pH ≥ 8, the increasing electrostatic repulsion among SF molecules disrupts the adsorption of SF at oil/water interfaces, thus making the resulting emulsion less stable and even fail to form at pH 10 [38]. The emulsion droplet size shows a maximum at pH 4, close to the pI, where the absence of electrostatic repulsion between the droplets promotes coalescence [27,38]. On the other hand, the positively charged ions significantly affect the adsorption and layer properties of SF at the oil/water interface and thus the emulsion stability, as a result of the strong electrostatic interactions between counter-ions and the negatively charged groups of SF (see Figure 5) [28]. Higher ionic strength leads to lower interface tension, faster establishment of the adsorption equilibrium, higher interfacial strength, and lower interfacial fracture at large deformation, due to the reduction in the effective charge on SF molecules and enhanced adsorption and intermolecular interaction. However, at higher ion concentrations, the electrostatic screening and ion-binding effects result in SF aggregation, droplet coalescence, and a decreased emulsion stability, owing to the reduction in electrostatic repulsion. The droplet size exhibits a drastic increase with the addition of salt, and the stable emulsion fraction decreases with the increase in salt concentration (Cion), especially for dodecane/water emulsions. The emulsions are more stable when the added salt is monovalent (NaCl) than when it is divalent (CaCl2) or even trivalent (NdCl3). This is in agreement with earlier reports on α-lactalbumin and BLG, where destabilization is attributed to Ca2+ binding with the free carboxylic groups of aspartic and glutamic acids. This phenomenon can be explained by the stronger elastic modulus of the interfacial SF layers in the presence of NaCl, as evaluated by interfacial shear rheology [50]. It is found that a suitable addition of negatively charged beet pectin can improve the stability of SF emulsions at pH 4 by covering the surface of positively charged SF-coated oil droplets and thus preventing emulsion aggregation. A low concentration of beet pectin causes charge neutralization and bridging flocculation, and a high concentration of beet pectin causes depletion flocculation of larger droplets, both of which lead to a sharp decline of emulsion stability. Beet pectin can also improve the stability of SF-stabilized emulsions at high salt concentrations at pH 3 by increasing the steric repulsion, that was interpreted by the authors as the consequence of a reduction in van der Waals interactions between the droplets. Besides emulsion stability, beet pectin enhances the oxidative stability of SF-stabilized emulsions during storage [49]. In practical applications, strong emulsion stability against environmental stress is generally required, because of the coexistance of emulsifiers and additives, and the change in pH and temperature. The sensitivity of SF molecule-stabilized emulsions to pH and ionic strength due to the unstable interfacial conformation changes significantly limits the applications of SF as an emulsifier. Therefore, pre-structured SF may solve this problem, endow the emulsion with a higher stability to resist environmental changes, and widen the applications of SF-stabilized emulsions in various fields.

3. Emulsions Stabilized by Silk Fibroin Nanofibers

SF nanofibers can be prepared by concentrating fresh aqueous SF solution to obtain metastable nanoparticles, diluting the concentrated solution with ultrapure water, and then incubating the diluted solution at 60 °C to induce the nanofiber formation [5]. Different from SF molecules in aqueous solution, SF nanofibers, formed through a controllable self-assembly process, have a high β-sheet content and charge density, hydrophobic properties, and water dispersibility [5]. SF nanofibers can form solutions and gels in aqueous solutions at different concentrations, and they become a versatile emulsifier presenting excellent long-term stability at high temperature, near the isoelectric point, and at high salinity [5]. Emulsions can be obtained by using high-speed dispersion machines to emulsify SF nanofiber solutions with oils [5]. Similarly to SF molecules, SF nanofibers can also form interconnected networks with pore sizes of 3–8 nm at oil/water interfaces and stabilize emulsions in a wide range of water/oil ratios and oil polarities (see Figure 6). The size of emulsion droplets first increases with the water/oil ratio but then decreases again, exhibiting a maximum at a ratio of 3:7. Larger SF nanofiber concentration, higher homogenization speed, and longer homogenization time help to decrease the droplet size. Emulsions stabilized by SF nanofibers show superior stability, being stable without any phase separation for 6 months at room temperature or even at 60 °C. Moreover, these emulsions are still stable after 3 months at high salt concentrations and low pH values due to the strong physical entanglements and interactions of SF nanofibers, a situation that surfactants, peptides, and SF molecules cannot achieve. The superior stability endows SF nanofibers with the universality and versatility for emulsion applications. Hence, tunable microcapsules can be fabricated by regulating the oil phases, the water/oil ratio, and the concentration, conformation, and size of SF nanofibers.

4. Emulsions Stabilized by Silk Fibroin Nanobrushes

As a nanocomposite of SF nanofibers and SF nanowhiskers, SF nanobrushes have a shorter length than SF nanofibers and a partially thinner diameter than SF nanowhiskers, and possess peculiar three-dimensional nanostructure, excellent structure-performance-regulated and function-enhanced properties, and biocompatibility [51]. SF nanobrushes can be prepared by a nanowhisker nanotemplate-guided self-assembly of an aqueous SF solution. According to the classical micelle model of silk assembly, the SF molecules in aqueous solution self-assemble directly on the straight segmeents of SF nanowhiskers, which are isolated from degummed SF by the top-down acid-hydrolysis approach. SF nanobrushes exhibit a greater ability to lower the interfacial tension than SF nanofibers and nanowhiskers. Similarly to SF nanofibers and nanowhiskers, the β-strands of SF nanobrushes orient parallel to the fibrillar axis. The peculiar brush-like nanostructure endows SF nanobrushes with the capability to form much more sophisticated and interconnected networks than straight rod/fiber-like nanomaterials when stabilizing oil/water interfaces, and ultra-stable biocompatible emulsions can be achieved by ultrasonicating an aqueous SF nanobrush dispersion and an oil phase. SF nanobrushes can resist creaming in a wide range of concentrations and stabilize various types of emlsions from liquid-like to gel-like ones. Higher ultrasonication intensity leads to the breakage of more fragments from the branches at SF nanobrushes and larger droplet size (see Figure 7), thus causing the decrease in the emulsion stability. Increasing SF nanobrush concentration helps to reduce the creaming index, decrease the droplet size, and enhance the emulsion viscosity, due to the strong interactions and interchain network formation of the relatively long and flexible SF nanofiber branches in the nanobrushes. However, when the SF nanobrush concentration exceeds a critical value, droplet flocculation occurs due to the formation of “strips” by the linkage of excess SF nanobrushes. Moreover, emulsions stabilized by SF nanobrushes exhibit gel-like and shear-thinning behaviors in rheological measurement [51].

5. Emulsions Stabilized by Silk Fibroin Particles

In order to avoid gelation issues at high SF concentrations during emulsion fabrication, SF micro- or nanoparticles were chosen to prepare oil/water Pickering emulsions. SF microparticles, synthesized via a salting-out process by the addition of a cold solution of concentrated ionic phosphate to a SF aqueous solution to form nuclei, the Ostwald ripening in an ice bath to increase the homogeneity of particles, and the exposure to a 60 °C water bath to increase the β-sheet content and reduce particle solubility (see Figure 8). The obtained SF microparticles have a porous inner structure with a pore diameter of 0.1–0.2 μm and a controllable size via regulating SF concentrations [52]. Emulsions stabilized by SF microparticles show a three-layer structure, with larger droplets in the upper layer, smaller droplets in the lower layer, and free SF microparticles at the bottom. Increasing the oil/water ratio leads to a decrease in the volume of the stable emulsion, a linear increase in the droplet size, and a higher polydispersity of droplets [52].
SF nanoparticles, with a folded β-sheet-dominated secondary structure, can be prepared by dissolving degummed silk in non-toxic, non-volatile, and cost-effective aqueous phosphoric acid (PA), and then by coagulating in acetone [38]. The β-sheet structures help SF nanoparticles to enhance the structure stability against environmental stresses such as heating and high salt concentrations, and to prevent emulsion destabilization caused by the conformational changes in SF. The three-phase contact angle of 92.5°, very close to 90°, renders SF nanoparticles highly capable to adsorb at oil/water interfaces. The negtive zeta potential of around −20 mV endows SF nanoparticles with the ability to prevent droplet coalescence and to enhance the emulsion stability by electrostatic repulsion (see Figure 9). During emulsion fabrication, increasing homogenization pressure and time results in a stronger emulsification capability of SF nanoparticles and finer emulsions with smaller droplet size. After experiencing creaming, the obtained Pickering emulsions are very stable with few changes in droplet size after storing for one month. The size of emulsion droplets decreases with the increase in particle load, homogenization time, homogenization speed, and the decrease in oil/water ratio. More stable emulsions can form with smaller SF nanoparticles, higher nanoparticle loading, and lower oil volume fractions. Similarly to the emulsions stabilized by SF molecules, the Pickering emulsions stabilized by SF nanoparticles show gel-like structure characteristics, larger storage modulus and viscosity at higher emusifier loading, and a shear-thinning behavior. Moreover, the Pickering emulsions stabilized by SF nanoparticles can endure heat and high ionic strength, exhibiting no significant change in droplet size after storage at 60 °C and adding 1 M salt for one week. However, the stability of these emulsions is very sensitive to pH due to the changes in the surface charge of SF nanoparticles. At pH 2 and pH 6, the emulsions can be stabilized by repulsive interactions between the positively charged or negtively charged particles, respectively. At pH 4, near the isoelectric point of SF, the charge neutralization makes SF nanoparticles lose mutual repulsion, which in turn leads to the increase in droplet size and a decreased emulsion stability. At alkaline pH (pH ≥ 8), the extremely strong electrostatic repulsion among the particles disrupts the interfacial particle adsorption, and even results in particle desorption from the interface and final emulsion breakdown at pH 10 [38]. The pH-responsiveness makes these Pickering emulsions useful for emulsion polymerization and catalyst/emulsifier recycling [53].

6. Stabilization Mechanism of SF-Stabilized Emulsions

Like other proteins, SF molecules can stabilize emulsions by adsorbing at the oil/water interface, decreasing the interfacial tension, forming protective films at the droplet surface, and preventing or decelerating droplet coalescence and/or Ostwald ripening. In addition, the SF network structures formed at the interface increase the emulsion viscosity and reduce the encountering frequency of droplets, further contributing to the stabilization of emulsions. At the oil/water interface, the adsorbed SF molecules experience conformational transitions and intermolecular self-assembly and thereby form stable, solid-like interfacial gels with ordered β-sheet structures and high interfacial moduli [35]. The conformational changes and molecular rearrangements of SF seem very fast without obvious interfacial gel transitions, but the β-sheet formation experiences much slower physical crosslinking and structural reorganization into entangled networks. Higher SF concentrations help to shorten the time to attain adsorption equilibration and to form network structures at the interface with a higher elastic modulus that resist breakage, which leads to a higher emulsion stability with less water released during storage. However, as CSF exceeds a critical value, the adsorbed SF molecules can no longer pack well due to the jamming state, thus causing the decrease in interfacial elasticity and toughness and even the transition of the emulsion from a liquid to gel state. Interfacial rheology results show that the interface between water and a nonpolar oil, in comparison to a polar oil, supports more SF molecules and promotes the formation of interfacial SF films with higher elastic moduli and greater toughness [29]. However, macroscopic emulsions with high-polarity oil exhibit higher stability, larger storage moduli, and enhanced yield stresses in the bulk rheology [26]. This indicates that the interfacial layers formed in bulk oil/water systems may be slightly different from the interfacial layers formed at single oil/water interfaces, bringing about the differences in the impact of oil polarity on the microscopic interfacial stability and the macroscopic emulsion stability.
The stabilization of emulsions with molecular SF as an emulsifier depends on the interfacial self-assembly of SF molecules to form β-sheet structures, while SF nanofibers with typical β-sheet structures can be directly used to stabilize emulsions [5]. SF nanofibers can form tight physical entanglement networks at the oil/water interface, and endow superior stability. The conformation of SF nanofibers shows no change after emulsion formation, which overcomes the drawback of single SF molecules with uncontrollable conformational transition. Hydrophobic SF nanofibers provide a controllable and reliable material to prepare more stable emulsions, as compared not only with single SF molecules, but also with other peptide nanofibers. The higher stability of emulsions is reached by SF nanofibers with respect to SF molecules because of their tighter and stronger interfacial networks and the force balance between a charge repulsion inside and outside the droplets. At neutral state and without salt addition, the decreased charge repulsion outside the droplets weakens the interaction balance and emulsion stability. With the addition of salt or acid, the charge repulsion inside and outside the droplets is shielded, and the dominant physical entanglements and interactions of SF nanofibers help to recover the emulsion stability. The pore size of the interfacial SF nanofiber networks decreases at higher salt concentrations and lower pH values, and the reduction in the charge repulsion among SF nanofibers strengthens nanofiber interactions and interfacial network structures [5]. The superior stability of SF nanofiber-stabilized emulsions at high temperature, high salt concentrations, and low pH values helps to widen their applications in various fields. SF nanobrushes, as a nanocomposite of SF nanowhisker backbones and SF nanofiber branches, have a lower interfacial tension than the SF nanofibers and SF nanowhiskers alone. Their peculiar three-dimensional brush-like nanostructure allows SF nanobrushes to form much more sophisticated and interconnected networks than SF molecules and simple SF nanofibers at the oil/water interface, and thus ultra-stable biocompatible emulsions can be obtained for a wide range of concentrations [51].
Different from SF molecules and SF nanofibers, SF particles stabilize emulsions by forming dense particle layers after irreversible adsorption at the oil/water interface. The resulting strong mechanical barrier prevents droplet flocculation and coalescence. Moreover, the surface charge of SF particles, contributed by the amino-acid sequences of the hydrophilic domains, generates electrostatic repulsion between the emulsion droplets, thus preventing droplet aggregation and enhancing emulsion stability [38]. SF particles obtain the folded β-sheet secondary structure through the self-assembly of SF molecules during the regeneration process, similar to SF nanofibers and SF nanobrushes. The water-insoluble β-sheets, formed by the folding of hexapeptide sequences in SF molecules, enhance the structural stability against environmental stress and prevent emulsion destabilization [38]. Therefore, the pre-structuring procedure avoids the unstable structure transition of SF molecules in actual applications, and the emulsions stabilized by SF nanofibers and SF nanoparticles show superior stability at high temperature and high salt concentration.

7. Conclusions

SF concentration, SF morphology, oil polarity, oil/water volume ratio, and environmental conditions play significant roles in the molecular adsorption, structural reorganization, and interfacial viscoelasticity of SF at oil/water interfaces. In turn, these factors, as well as the emulsion fabrication technique, have great influences on the stability of the resulting emulsions. Increasing homogenization speed, time, or pressure helps to promote the emulsification efficiency and to produce more stable emulsions with smaller droplet size and fewer irregular droplets. The time to attain the adsorption equilibrium is shortened with increasing SF concentration, with increasing oil polarity, and with the addition of salt. The interfacial strength and toughness of SF layers and, hence, the emulsion stability can be enhanced by raising SF concentration and adding salt to the aqueous phase. pH values close to the pI or above pH 8 lead to emulsion instability, due to the loss of mutual repulsion caused by charge neutralization or SF desorption caused by the extremely strong electrostatic repulsion.
Nanostructured SF, such as SF nanofibers and SF nanoparticles, possesses β-sheet-dominated secondary structures, and the enhanced structural stability endows them with the capability to resist environmental stresses such as high temperature and high salt concentrations, which overcomes the drawback of isolated SF molecules with unstable conformation transitions during the application. Emulsions stabilized by SF nanofibers can even show superior stability at low pH, because of the formation of tight and strong entangled networks, which endows SF nanofibers with the universality and versatility for various emulsion applications. Although the emulsions stabilized by SF nanoparticles cannot resist extreme pHs, the pH-responsiveness can endow these Pickering emulsions with intelligent features that are very useful for emulsion polymerization and catalyst/emulsifier recycling. SF molecules stabilize emulsions by interfacial molecular self-assembly to β-sheet-structured viscoelastic films, after adsorbing at oil/water interfaces. Nanostructured SF and SF particles, with β-sheet dominated secondary structures, can be directly used to stabilize emulsions by physical entanglement networks or particle adsorption layers formed at the oil/water interface. Compared with other protein-stabilized emulsions, the SF-stabilized emulsions possess great advantages of low cost, controllable microstructure and properties, higher compatibility with biocomponents, and superior stability at high temperatures, high salt concentrations, and extreme pH values, via the regulation of the SF morphology. Biocompatible emulsions stabilized by SF have a promising future for applications in different fields, such as in cosmetics, food, drug delivery, and biomedicine. Some functional food, skin care products, and porous scaffolds have already been commercialized [20,54]. The understanding of the relationship between adsorption, interfacial viscoelasticity, and the emulsification properties of SF is very important for the design, preparation, and application of SF emulsions in various fields.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Q. and R.M.; methodology, X.Q. and R.M.; investigation, X.Q.; resources, E.S. and K.S.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Q.; writing—review and editing, X.Q., R.M., and E.S.; and project administration, E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT FOUNDATION, grant number CHN/1150450.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the cited references. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Reproduced from Refs. [26,27,36] with permission from Elsevier. Reproduced from Ref. [28] with permission from Wiley. Reproduced from Refs. [5,34,35,50] with permission from ACS.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Miller, R.; Guzmán, E. (Eds.) Emulsions: From single interfaces to applications. In Progress in Colloid and Interface Science; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2025; Volume 8, ISBN 9781032636108. [Google Scholar]
  2. McClements, D.J. Food Emulsions: Principles, Practice and Techniques; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dickinson, E. Food emulsions and foams: Stabilization by particles. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 15, 40–49. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bos, M.A.; Vliet, T.V. Interfacial rheological properties of adsorbed protein layers and surfactants: A review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2001, 91, 437–471. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng, Q.Q.; Zhang, B.B.; He, Y.; Lu, Q.; Kaplan, D.L. Silk nanofibers as robust and versatile emulsifiers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 35693–35700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, T.; Xu, J.M.; Chen, J.H.; Wang, Z.Q.; Wang, X.C.; Zhong, J. Protein nanoparticles for Pickering emulsions: A comprehensive review on their shapes, preparation methods, and modification methods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 113, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Peng, D.F.; Yang, J.C.; Li, J.; Tang, C.; Li, B. Foams stabilized by β-lactoglobulin amyloid fibrils: Effect of pH. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 10658–10665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dombrowski, J.; Gschwendtner, M.; Saalfeld, D.; Kulozik, U. Salt-dependent interaction behavior of β-lactoglobulin molecules in relation, to their surface and foaming properties. Colloid Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 558, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tang, C.H.; Shen, L. Dynamic adsorption and dilatational properties of BSA at oil/water interface: Role of conformational flexibility. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 43, 388–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mehta, S.B.; Lewus, R.; Bee, J.S.; Randolph, T.W.; Carpenter, J.F. Gelation of a monoclonal antibody at the silicone oil-water interface and subsequent rupture of the interfacial gel results in aggregation and particle formation. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 104, 1282–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Burgess, D.J.; Sahin, N.O. Interfacial rheological and tension properties of protein films. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1997, 189, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kulmyrzaev, A.A.; Chubert, H. Influence of KCl on the physicochemical properties of whey protein stabilized emulsions. Food Hydrocoll. 2004, 18, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Saito, M.; Yin, L.J.; Kobayashi, I.; Nakajima, M. Comparison of stability of bovine serum albumin-stabilized emulsions prepared by micro-channel emulsification and homogenization. Food Hydrocoll. 2006, 20, 1020–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Romero, A.; Beaumal, V.; David-Briand, E.; Cordobés, F.; Guerrero, A.; Anton, M. Interfacial and oil/water emulsions characterization of potato protein isolate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 9466–9474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pradines, V.; Fainerman, V.B.; Aksenenko, E.V.; Krägel, J.; Wüstneck, R.; Miller, R. Adsorption of protein-surfactant complexes at the water/oil interface. Langmuir 2011, 27, 965–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Courthaudon, J.L.; Dickinson, E.; Matsumura, Y.; Clark, D.C. Competitive adsorption of β-lactoglobulin + Tween 20 at the oil-water interface. Colloids Surf. 1991, 56, 293–300. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dalgleish, D.G.; Srinivasan, M.; Singh, H. Surface properties of oil-in-water emulsion droplets containing casein and Tween 60. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1995, 43, 2351–2355. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pérez-Rigueiro, J.; Viney, C.; Llorca, J.; Elices, M. Silkworm silk as an engineering material. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1998, 70, 2439–2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, S.M.; Cho, D.; Park, W.H.; Lee, S.G.; Han, S.O.; Drzal, L.T. Novel silk/poly(butylene succinate) biocomposites: The effect of short fibre content on their mechanical and thermal properties. Comp. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 647–657. [Google Scholar]
  20. Xu, L.; Wu, C.; Yap, P.L.; Losic, D.; Zhu, J.; Yang, Y.; Qiao, S.; Ma, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H. Recent advances of silk fibroin materials: From molecular modification and matrix enhancement to possible encapsulation-related functional food applications. Food Chem. 2024, 438, 137964. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Sangkert, S.; Meesane, J.; Kamonmattayakul, S.; Chai, W.L. Modified silk fibroin scaffolds with collagen/decellularized pulp for bone tissue engineering in cleft palate: Morphological structures and biofunctionalities. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 58, 87–88. [Google Scholar]
  22. Elia, R.; Michelson, C.D.; Perera, A.L.; Brunner, T.F.; Harsono, M.; Leisk, G.G.; Kugel, G.; Kaplan, D.L. Electrodeposited silk coatings for bone implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2014, 103, 1602–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhong, T.Y.; Jiang, Z.J.; Wang, P.; Bie, S.Y.; Zhang, F.; Zuo, B.Q. Silk fibroin/copolymer composite hydrogels for the controlled and sustained release of hydrophobic/hydrophilic drugs. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 494, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jin, H.J.; Kaplan, D.L. Mechanism of silk processing in insects and spiders. Nature 2003, 424, 1057–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vollrath, F.; Knight, D.P. Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk. Nature 2001, 410, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qiao, X.Y.; Wang, L.J.; Shao, Z.Z.; Sun, K.; Miller, R. Stability and rheological behaviors of different oil/water emulsions stabilized by natural silk fibroin. Colloids Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2015, 475, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tang, X.X.; Qiao, X.Y.; Sun, K. Effect of pH on the interfacial viscoelasticity and stability of the silk fibroin at the oil/water interface. Colloids Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2015, 486, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tang, X.X.; Qiao, X.Y.; Miller, R.; Sun, K. Effect of ionic strength on the interfacial viscoelasticity and stability of silk fibroin at the oil/water interface. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 4918–4928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qiao, X.Y.; Miller, R.; Sun, K. Interfacial adsorption, viscoelasticity and recovery of silk fibroin layers at different oil/water interface. Colloids Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2017, 519, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qiao, X.Y.; Miller, R.; Schneck, E.; Sun, K. Effect of surfactants on the interfacial viscoelasticity and stability of silk fibroin at different oil–water interfaces. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2024, 104, 2928–2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mahboubi, F.N.; Simon, L.; Devoisselle, J.M.; Begu, S. From silk components to emulsions. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2025, 343, 103547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Baimark, Y. Morphology and thermal stability of cross-linked silk fibroin microparticles prepared by the water-in-oil emulsion solvent diffusion method. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2012, 7, S112–S117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cheng, C.; Teasdale, I.; Brüggemann, O. Stimuli-responsive capsules prepared from regenerated silk fibroin microspheres. Macromol. Biosci. 2014, 14, 807–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, L.H.; Qian, Y.N.; Jiang, C.; Lv, Y.G.; Liu, W.Q.; Zhong, L.; Cai, K.Y.; Li, S.; Yang, L. The use of hyaluronan to regulate protein adsorption and cell infiltration in nanofibrous scaffolds. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 3428–3445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wen, J.; Yao, J.; Chen, X.; Shao, Z. Silk fibroin acts as a self-emulsifier to prepare hierarchically porous silk fibroin scaffolds through emulsion−ice dual templates. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 3396−3405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Oral, C.B.; Yetiskin, R.; Cil, C.; Kok, F.N.; Okay, O. Silk fibroin-based shape-memory organohydrogels with semicrystalline microinclusions. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2023, 6, 1594–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Huang, S.; Peng, J.; Zi, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Xu, J.; Gong, H.; Kan, G.; Wang, X.; Zhong, J. Regenerated silk fibroin for the stabilization of fish oil-loaded Pickering emulsions. Colloids Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 678, 132523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sun, S.; Deng, Y.; Sun, F.; Mao, Z.; Feng, X.; Sui, X.; Liu, F.; Zhou, X.; Wang, B. Engineering regenerated nanosilk to efficiently stabilize pickering emulsions. Colloids Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 635, 128065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Erni, P.; Fischer, P.; Windhab, E.J. Role of viscoelastic interfaces in emulsion rheology and drop deformation. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 2007, 14, 246–249. [Google Scholar]
  40. Guo, Q.; Mu, T.H. Emulsifying properties of sweet potato protein: Effect of protein concentration and oil volume fraction. Food Hydrocoll. 2011, 25, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, B.; Li, D.; Wang, L.J.; Özkan, N. Effect of concentrated flaxseed protein on the stability and rheological properties of soybean oil-in-water emulsions. J. Food Eng. 2010, 96, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, L.J.; Xie, H.E.; Qiao, X.Y.; Goffin, A.; Hodgkinson, T.; Yuan, X.F.; Sun, K.; Fuller, G.G. Interfacial rheology of natural silk fibroin at air/water and oil/water interfaces. Langmuir 2012, 28, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Torres, L.G.; Iturbe, R.; Snowden, M.J.; Chowdhry, B.Z.; Leharne, S.A. Preparation of o/w emulsions stabilized by solid particles and their characterization by oscillatory rheology. Colloids Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2007, 302, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dickinson, E.; Golding, M. Rheology of sodium caseinate stabilized oil-in-water emulsions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1997, 191, 166–176. [Google Scholar]
  45. Partanen, R.; Forssell, P.; Mackie, A.; Blomberg, E. Interfacial cross-linking of β-casein changes the structure of the adsorbed layer. Food Hydrocoll. 2013, 32, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jung, J.M.; Gunes, D.Z.; Mezzenga, R. Interfacial activity and interfacial shear rheology of native β-lactoglobulin monomers and their heat-induced fibers. Langmuir 2010, 26, 15366–15375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Erçelebi, E.; Ibanoğlu, E. Rheological properties of whey protein isolate stabilized emulsions with pectin and guar gum. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2009, 229, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tcholakova, S.; Denkov, N.D.; Ivanov, I.B.; Campbell, B. Coalescence stability of emulsions containing globular milk proteins. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 123, 259–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chen, B.; Li, H.; Ding, Y.; Rao, J. Improvement of physicochemical stabilities of emulsions containing oil droplets coated by non-globular protein-beet pectin complex membranes. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1468–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pappas, C.P.; Rothwell, J. The effects of heating, alone or in the presence of calcium or lactose, on calcium binding to milk proteins. Food Chem. 1991, 42, 183–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hu, Y.L.; Zou, Y.J.; Ma, Y.; Yu, J.; Liu, L.; Chen, M.J.; Ling, S.J.; Fan, Y.M. Formulation of silk fibroin nanobrush-stabilized biocompatible Pickering emulsions. Langmuir 2022, 38, 14302–14312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hu, Y.; Cao, Y.T.; Nguyen, F.M.; Frank, B.D.; Kalinowski, M.J.; Li, M.; Rajani, S.; Marelli, B. Antibody-targeted phytohormone delivery using foliar sprayed silk fibroin Pickering emulsions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2402618. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tang, J.; Quinlan, P.J.; Tam, K.C. Stimuli-responsive Pickering emulsions: Recent advances and potential applications. Soft Matter 2015, 11, 3512–3529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Li, S.J.; Chen, H.; Dan, X.; Ju, Y.K.; Li, T.; Liu, B.; Li, Y.; Lei, L.J.; Fan, X. Silk fibroin for cosmetic dermatology. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 506, 159986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Droplet size of SF-stabilized fish oil/water emulsions with an oil/water volume ratio of 1:1 fabricated at different homogenizing speeds (a) and times (b). They were summarized from the Gaussian fitting of the droplet size distribution in the emulsions, and “Peak” refers to the peaks in the fitted multimodal distributions [37].
Figure 1. Droplet size of SF-stabilized fish oil/water emulsions with an oil/water volume ratio of 1:1 fabricated at different homogenizing speeds (a) and times (b). They were summarized from the Gaussian fitting of the droplet size distribution in the emulsions, and “Peak” refers to the peaks in the fitted multimodal distributions [37].
Colloids 10 00013 g001
Figure 2. Dependence of droplet size on SF concentration (CSF) and oil/water volume ratio (ϕo) for butyl butyrate/water emulsions stabilized by SF. The inset plots are microscope images of these emulsions taken 7 days after emulsion preparation [26].
Figure 2. Dependence of droplet size on SF concentration (CSF) and oil/water volume ratio (ϕo) for butyl butyrate/water emulsions stabilized by SF. The inset plots are microscope images of these emulsions taken 7 days after emulsion preparation [26].
Colloids 10 00013 g002
Figure 3. Change in the creaming index (CI) with storage time and images for SF-stabilized fish/oil emulsions: (a) CI of emulsions with the same ϕo (1:1) but different CSF in aqueous solution (2, 6, 10, 14, and 18 mg/mL); (b) CI of emulsions with the same CSF = 14 mg/mL in aqueous solution but different ϕo (3:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, and 1:3); and (c) macroscopic and microscopic images of emulsions taken 3 days after preparation, and the scale bar is 20 μm [37].
Figure 3. Change in the creaming index (CI) with storage time and images for SF-stabilized fish/oil emulsions: (a) CI of emulsions with the same ϕo (1:1) but different CSF in aqueous solution (2, 6, 10, 14, and 18 mg/mL); (b) CI of emulsions with the same CSF = 14 mg/mL in aqueous solution but different ϕo (3:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, and 1:3); and (c) macroscopic and microscopic images of emulsions taken 3 days after preparation, and the scale bar is 20 μm [37].
Colloids 10 00013 g003
Figure 4. Time evolution of the interfacial shear moduli of SF in buffer solutions with different pH values during the adsorption at the butyl butyrate/water interface: (a) pH 3; (b) pH 4; and (c) pH 7. The SF concentration CSF rangs from 5*10−6 g/ml to 1*10−4 g/ml [27].
Figure 4. Time evolution of the interfacial shear moduli of SF in buffer solutions with different pH values during the adsorption at the butyl butyrate/water interface: (a) pH 3; (b) pH 4; and (c) pH 7. The SF concentration CSF rangs from 5*10−6 g/ml to 1*10−4 g/ml [27].
Colloids 10 00013 g004
Figure 5. Time evolution of interfacial shear moduli for SF at the dodecane/water interface during adsorption from aqueous salt solutions: (a) NaCl; (b) CaCl2; and (c) NdCl3 [28].
Figure 5. Time evolution of interfacial shear moduli for SF at the dodecane/water interface during adsorption from aqueous salt solutions: (a) NaCl; (b) CaCl2; and (c) NdCl3 [28].
Colloids 10 00013 g005
Figure 6. Morphology and structure of emulsions formed at various volume ratios of SF nanofiber solution to dodecane: (A) optical photographs; (B) size distribution; (C) fluorescence micrographs of the emulsions at various water/oil ratios; (D) high magnification of the interface in the emulsions; and (E) schematic of the process for the formation of oil-in-water emulsions [5].
Figure 6. Morphology and structure of emulsions formed at various volume ratios of SF nanofiber solution to dodecane: (A) optical photographs; (B) size distribution; (C) fluorescence micrographs of the emulsions at various water/oil ratios; (D) high magnification of the interface in the emulsions; and (E) schematic of the process for the formation of oil-in-water emulsions [5].
Colloids 10 00013 g006
Figure 7. AFM images of SF nanobrushes that experienced 0 (a), 40% (b), and 60% (c) intensity ultrasonication; schematic representation of a SF-nanobrush-stabilized Pickering emulsion preparation (d); SF nanobrush-stabilized Pickering emulsions formulated by 40% (e) and 60% (f) intensity ultrasonication [51]. The 0%, 40%, and 60% intensity ultrosonication likely refers to the percentage of the maximum intensity achieved by the instrument. The green circles in (ac) show the brush-like morphology of SF nanobrushes. The pink circles in (ac) show the incomplete brush-like morphology or even non-brushlike shape of SF nanobrushes after a large number of fragments of branches were exfoliated. The yellow circles in (f) show that droplets from the 60% intensity were on the verge of break, indicating the instability of the emulsions.
Figure 7. AFM images of SF nanobrushes that experienced 0 (a), 40% (b), and 60% (c) intensity ultrasonication; schematic representation of a SF-nanobrush-stabilized Pickering emulsion preparation (d); SF nanobrush-stabilized Pickering emulsions formulated by 40% (e) and 60% (f) intensity ultrasonication [51]. The 0%, 40%, and 60% intensity ultrosonication likely refers to the percentage of the maximum intensity achieved by the instrument. The green circles in (ac) show the brush-like morphology of SF nanobrushes. The pink circles in (ac) show the incomplete brush-like morphology or even non-brushlike shape of SF nanobrushes after a large number of fragments of branches were exfoliated. The yellow circles in (f) show that droplets from the 60% intensity were on the verge of break, indicating the instability of the emulsions.
Colloids 10 00013 g007
Figure 8. (a) Scheme of the synthesis procedure of water-insoluble SF microparticles. (b) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of SF microparticles synthesized in freshly prepared phosphate salt solutions, showing a diameter range of 2–3 μm. (c) Linear fitting of the Pickering emulsion droplet diameter increasing with the oil/water ratio [52].
Figure 8. (a) Scheme of the synthesis procedure of water-insoluble SF microparticles. (b) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of SF microparticles synthesized in freshly prepared phosphate salt solutions, showing a diameter range of 2–3 μm. (c) Linear fitting of the Pickering emulsion droplet diameter increasing with the oil/water ratio [52].
Colloids 10 00013 g008
Figure 9. (a) TEM image and (b) three-phase contact angle of SF nanoparticles. (c) The microstructures and bulk appearances of SF nanoparticles-stabilized emulsions with the same oil/water ratio (1:9) but different particle concentrations 1 day after preparation [38].
Figure 9. (a) TEM image and (b) three-phase contact angle of SF nanoparticles. (c) The microstructures and bulk appearances of SF nanoparticles-stabilized emulsions with the same oil/water ratio (1:9) but different particle concentrations 1 day after preparation [38].
Colloids 10 00013 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiao, X.; Miller, R.; Schneck, E.; Sun, K. Biocompatible Emulsions Stabilized by Natural Silk Fibroin. Colloids Interfaces 2026, 10, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids10010013

AMA Style

Qiao X, Miller R, Schneck E, Sun K. Biocompatible Emulsions Stabilized by Natural Silk Fibroin. Colloids and Interfaces. 2026; 10(1):13. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids10010013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiao, Xiuying, Reinhard Miller, Emanuel Schneck, and Kang Sun. 2026. "Biocompatible Emulsions Stabilized by Natural Silk Fibroin" Colloids and Interfaces 10, no. 1: 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids10010013

APA Style

Qiao, X., Miller, R., Schneck, E., & Sun, K. (2026). Biocompatible Emulsions Stabilized by Natural Silk Fibroin. Colloids and Interfaces, 10(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids10010013

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop